DOCSLIB.ORG

Enhanced Biosecurity Risk Analysis Tools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enhanced Biosecurity Risk Analysis Tools Enhanced Biosecurity risk analysis tools CRC For National Plant Biosecurity Project Number: MT06032 MT06032 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the apple and pear, potato and vegetable industries. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the apple and pear, potato and vegetable industries. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 2279 9 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2010 Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity Final Report CRC10010 Enhanced Risk Analysis Tools Authors David C. Cook, Michael Hurley, Shuang Liu, Abu-Baker M. Siddique, Kim E. Lowell and Art Diggle 31 March 2010 © Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity All rights reserved Project Leader contact details: Name: David Cook Address: CSIRO Entomology, Clunies Ross St, Acton, ACT 2601 Phone: +61 2 6246 4093 Fax: +61 2 6246 4000 Email: [email protected] CRCNPB contact details: Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity LPO Box 5012 Bruce ACT 5012 Phone: +61 (0)2 6201 2882 Fax: +61 (0)2 6201 5067 Email: [email protected] Web: www.crcplantbiosecurity.com.au Table of contents 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................8 2. Aims and objectives .......................................................................................9 3. Key findings ............................................................................................... 11 3.1. Methodological Review ........................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 13 3.1.2. Three problems in current biosecurity economics research .................................. 14 3.1.3. Solutions in biosecurity economics research ...................................................... 18 3.1.4. Non-market valuation tools for estimating impacts on ecosystem services ................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.5. System modelling and incorporating uncertainty ................................................ 27 3.1.6. Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) ....................... 29 3.2. The Need for Decision Facilitation ............................................................ 31 3.3. An Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis..................................... 32 3.3.1. Decision-making and associated human behaviours ............................................ 32 3.3.2. The requirement for policy decision support ...................................................... 32 3.4. Form and Extent of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis ................................... 34 3.4.1. Background ................................................................................................... 34 3.4.2. Purpose and objectives of MCDA ...................................................................... 35 3.4.3. Characteristics and processes of MCDA ............................................................. 35 3.4.4. Software selection .......................................................................................... 36 3.4.5. Group dynamics and communication issues ....................................................... 37 3.4.6. Group choice shift .......................................................................................... 38 3.5. Form and extent of deliberative participatory decision-making frameworks .. 41 3.5.1. Background of deliberative participatory approaches .......................................... 41 3.5.2. Application of citizens’ jury to environmental issues ........................................... 42 3.5.3. The participatory approach .............................................................................. 42 3.5.4. An overview of participatory approach types...................................................... 43 3.6. Prioritising Emergency Plant Pest Risk with the use of Deliberative Multi- Criteria Evaluation ............................................................................................... 45 3.6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 45 3.6.2. Steps of the Deliberative Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach ................................ 46 3.7. Conceptual Framework for the Bioeconomic Model .................................... 50 3.8. Bioeconomic model structure and function ............................................... 54 3.8.1. Overview ...................................................................................................... 55 3.8.2. Infestation .................................................................................................... 59 3.8.3. Management ................................................................................................. 61 3.8.4 Economic costs ............................................................................................... 62 3.8.5. User interface ................................................................................................ 66 3.9. Quantitative impact simulation results ..................................................... 69 3.9.1. Apple ............................................................................................................ 72 3.9.2. Pear ............................................................................................................. 74 3.9.3. Potato .......................................................................................................... 76 3.9.4. Broccoli ........................................................................................................ 77 3.9.9. Sensitivity analysis ......................................................................................... 82 3.10. Application of Deliberative Multi-Criteria Evaluation to Emergency Plant Pest prioritisation ....................................................................................................... 90 3.10.1. Preparation and the Expert Reference Panel .................................................... 92 3.10.2. Stakeholder Analysis .................................................................................... 93 3.10.3. EPP Selection ............................................................................................... 94 3.10.4. Criteria Selection .......................................................................................... 96 3.10.5. Criteria Definitions ........................................................................................ 97 3.10.6. Assessment of the EPP options and the impact matrix ....................................... 98 3.10.7. Results ..................................................................................................... 100 4. Implications for stakeholders ...................................................................... 112 4.1. The bioeconomic modelling framework .................................................. 112 4.2. Deliberative multi-criteria evaluation ..................................................... 113 4.3. Are future societal trends going to change EPP risk substantially? ............. 113 4.4. How can policy makers use this study? .................................................. 113 5. Recommendations ..................................................................................... 115 6. Abbreviations/glossary ............................................................................... 117 7. Plain English website summary ................................................................... 119 8. References ............................................................................................... 121 9. Appendix 1 – Bioeconomic Model Parameters ................................................ 131 10. Appendix 2 – Threat Data Sheets ................................................................ 134 Tables Table 1. Examples of negative impacts associated with the black wattle invasion (de Wit, Crookes et al. 2001). .............................................................................................. 14 Table 2. Summary of 55-year values lost to Tamarix (0% discount rate) (Zavaleta 2000) ............................................................................................................................ 21 Table 3. Examples of impacts of invasion on ecosystem services ................................ 22 Table 4. Participatory methods broadly divided into categories of stakeholder, general public or the involvement of both groups (Rauschmayer and Wittmer 2006). ................. 42 Table 5. Stakeholder analysis scoring table ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Species and Species-Groups of Aleiodes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mexico
    Brachystola magna Folia Entorno!. Mex., 41(2): 215-227 (2002) V.M.A.M. Y BERLANGA- DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES AND SPECIES-GROUPS OF ALEIODES (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) IN MEXICO HUGO DELFÍN-GONZÁLEZ1 AND ROBERT A. WHARTON2 'Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autonóma de Yucatán, Apartado Postal4-116, Col. ltzimná, 97100 Mérida, Yucatán, México. 2Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station. Texas 77843, U .S.A. Delf'm-González, H. and R.A. Wharton. 2002. Distribution of species and species-groups of Aleiodes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mexico. Folia Entorno/. Mex., 41(2): 215-227. ABSTRACT. A study was made of Aleiodes species recorded in Mexico, and specimens deposited in various collections. Using the criteria of Portier and Shaw (1999), eight species groups were recognized from Mexico, with 21 described and 27 undescribed species recorded. These are first records in Mexico for A. earinos Shaw, A. graphicus (Cresson), A. notozophus Marsh and Shaw andA. politiceps (Gahan). The genus is widely distributed in Mexico, being present in 28 of 31 states. Results are discussed in relation to the richness patterns hypotheses of other authors. KEY WoRDs: Aleiodes, Mexico, distribution, Rogadinae, parasitoids. Simposio Control de Plaga de 9- 10 de marzo del2000. Durango, Delfín-González, H. y R.A. Wharton. 2002. Distribución de las especies y grupos de especies de Aleiodes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) en Mexico. Folia Entorno/. Mex., 41(2): 215-227. RESUMEN. El estudio se realizó con las especies de Aleiodes registradas en México y material depositado en varias colecciones. Utilizando los criterios de Portier y Shaw (1999) se reconocieron ocho grupos de especies presentes en México.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    - Vol. 3'3, No.3 & 4 Fall/Winter 2000 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 33 No. 3-4 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS New distribution record for the endangered crawling water beetle, Brychius hungerfordi (Coleoptera: Haliplidael ond notes on seasonal abundance and food preferences Michael Grant, Robert Vande Kopple and Bert Ebbers . ............... 165 Arhyssus hirtus in Minnesota: The inland occurrence of an east coast species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: RhopalidaeJ John D. Laftin and John Haarstad .. 169 Seasonol occurrence of the sod webworm moths (lepidoptera: Crambidoe) of Ohio Harry D. Niemczk, David 1. Shetlar, Kevin T. Power and Douglas S. Richmond. ... 173 Leucanthiza dircella (lepidoptera: Gracillariidae): A leafminer of leatherwood, Dirca pa/us/tis Toby R. Petriee, Robert A Haack, William J. Mattson and Bruce A. Birr. 187 New distribution records of ground beetles from the north-central United States (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Foster Forbes Purrington, Daniel K. Young, Kirk 1. lorsen and Jana Chin-Ting lee .......... 199 Libel/ula flavida (Odonata: libellulidoe], a dragonfly new to Ohio Tom D. Schultz. ... 205 Distribution of first instar gypsy moths [lepidoptera: Lymantriidae] among saplings of common Great Lakes understory species 1. l. and J. A. Witter ....... 209 Comparison of two population sampling methods used in field life history studies of Mesovelia mulsonti (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha: Mesoveliidae) in southern Illinois Steven J. Taylor and J. E McPherson ..... .. 223 COVER PHOTO Scudderio furcata Brunner von Wattenwyl (Tettigoniidae], the forktailed bush katydid. Photo taken in Huron Mountains, MI by M. F. O'Brien.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Population Dynamics in Pastures Treated with Mirex-Bait to Suppress Red Imported Fire Ant Populations
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1975 Arthropod Population Dynamics in Pastures Treated With Mirex-Bait to Suppress Red Imported Fire Ant Populations. Forrest William Howard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Howard, Forrest William, "Arthropod Population Dynamics in Pastures Treated With Mirex-Bait to Suppress Red Imported Fire Ant Populations." (1975). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2833. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2833 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological-Control-Programmes-In
    Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of the Side Species Group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America North of Mexico with Biological Notes on a Representative Species
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1984 The taxonomy of the side species group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America north of Mexico with biological notes on a representative species. Gary James Couch University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Couch, Gary James, "The taxonomy of the side species group of Spilochalcis (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in America north of Mexico with biological notes on a representative species." (1984). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3045. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3045 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TAXONOMY OF THE SIDE SPECIES GROUP OF SPILOCHALCIS (HYMENOPTERA:CHALCIDIDAE) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO WITH BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON A REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES. A Thesis Presented By GARY JAMES COUCH Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 1984 Department of Entomology THE TAXONOMY OF THE SIDE SPECIES GROUP OF SPILOCHALCIS (HYMENOPTERA:CHALCIDIDAE) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO WITH BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON A REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES. A Thesis Presented By GARY JAMES COUCH Approved as to style and content by: Dr. T/M. Peter's, Chairperson of Committee CJZl- Dr. C-M. Yin, Membe D#. J.S. El kin ton, Member ii Dedication To: My mother who taught me that dreams are only worth the time and effort you devote to attaining them and my father for the values to base them on.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichnews 7 (8), July 1985
    AIIAJ,;RICAN -:: N ~ ~-=-c L IOMOLOGICAL ; ._lNSIIIUTE ICHNEWS ;] Issue XJuly 1985 EDITORS Michael J. Sharkey Paul M. Marsh Biosystematics Research Inst. Systematic Entomology Laboratory Central Experimental Farm U.S. Department of Agriculture Ottawa, Ontario, KlA OC6 c/o U.S. National Museum Canada Washington, D.C., 10560 U.S.A. ******************************************************************************** EDITORS' NOTES Ichnews is finially back again. It was my original intention to provide a newsletter for bracon1d research only. However responses to our quest1ona1re overwelmingly supported the 1nclus1on of ichneumon1d research news. It 1s too late to include reports on Ichneumonidae research in this issue but we will begin to incorporate them next year . I was going to call the newsletter Braconologist's Bulletin, but since we will be including ichneumon1d research 1n the future I dec1ded to st1ck w1th the t1tle Ichnews. It should be noted that 'Ich' 1s an abbreviation for Ichneumonoidea not Ichneumon1dae as 1t was before. The last 1ssue of Ichnews was publ1shed by M. Fitton and I. Gauld 1n .· 1980 as number 6. We continue therefore beginning with number 7. Paul Marsh and I have decided to edit this publication together. We w111 alternate years. This year I have taken care of the newsletter and next year Paul w111. This issue of Ichnews 1s very late; from now on we hope to send out a quest1onaire in early fall and to have a finished product in the ma11 by the early spring. There were a few minor problems with this year's responses to the questionaire. Most people did not give important details about the scope of - 2 - their revisionary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Studies of Indian Parasitoids [Braconidae: Hymenoptera) of Leaf Miners (Lepidoptera)
    TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF INDIAN PARASITOIDS [BRACONIDAE: HYMENOPTERA) OF LEAF MINERS (LEPIDOPTERA) ^ ^ ABSTRACT . THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF ~:•^ •' ..... JN ZOOILOG Y 1 r^-' ^ )| 1 / v. -, X ly KAVITA PANDEY SECTION OF ENTOMOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH - 202002 (INDIA) 2006 ABSTRACT r . • t The family Braconida^ is cosmopolitan in distribution and contains over 17,500 described and valid species in-the world, the family with a few exceptions, contain species that are exclusively parasitoids of various other insect species belonging to the Lepidoptera. Coleoptera, Heteroptera and other Hymenoptera. and have extensively been used in the biological control of lepidopteran, coleopteran and other pest species. The present thesis deals with broconid parasitoids of leaf mining lepidopteran pests in Uttar Pradesh belonging to the following five subfamilies namely: Broconinae, Cheloninae, Homiinae, Microgastrinae and Miracinae. the author records 20 species of which 15 are new to science. The subfamily Braconinae is represented by the genus Br aeon Fabricius; Cheloninae by Chelonus Panzer; Microchelonus Szepligeti and Ascogaster Wesmael while Hormiinae is represented by only one genus Parahormus Nixon; Microgastrinae by two genera Dolichogendea Viereck and Pholetesor Mason and Miracinae by only one genus entistidea, Rhower, in the present thesis, the author records 20 species and of which 15 are new to science. Species described are new to science are: Bracon Phacospophagus sp. nov., Bracon. cosmopteryx sp. nov„ Bracon whitfieldi sp. nov., Chelonus caeruleus sp. nov., Microchelonus spinigaster sp. nov., Microchelonus Cordiae sp. nov., Microchelonus pongamiae sp. nov., Dolichogenidea. cordiae sp. nov., Dotichogenidea syngremma sp. nov., Centistidea achterbergi sp. nov., Centistidea punctatiscutellum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Accademia Nazionale Italiana Di Entomologia Anno LIX, 2011: 9-27
    ATTI DELLA ACCADEMIA NAZIONALE ITALIANA DI ENTOMOLOGIA RENDICONTI Anno LIX 2011 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI - FIRENZE ISSN 0065-0757 Direttore Responsabile: Prof. Romano Dallai Presidente Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia Coordinatore della Redazione: Dr. Roberto Nannelli La responsabilità dei lavori pubblicati è esclusivamente degli autori Registrazione al Tribunale di Firenze n. 5422 del 24 maggio 2005 INDICE Rendiconti Consiglio di Presidenza . Pag. 5 Elenco degli Accademici . »6 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 febbraio 2011 . »9 Verbali delle adunanze del 13 giugno 2011 . »15 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 novembre 2011 . »20 Commemorazioni GIUSEPPE OSELLA – Sandro Ruffo: uomo e scienziato. Ricordi di un collaboratore . »29 FRANCESCO PENNACCHIO – Ermenegildo Tremblay . »35 STEFANO MAINI – Giorgio Celli (1935-2011) . »51 Tavola rotonda su: L’ENTOMOLOGIA MERCEOLOGICA PER LA PREVENZIONE E LA LOTTA CONTRO GLI INFESTANTI NELLE INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI VACLAV STEJSKAL – The role of urban entomology to ensure food safety and security . »69 PIERO CRAVEDI, LUCIANO SÜSS – Sviluppo delle conoscenze in Italia sugli organismi infestanti in post- raccolta: passato, presente, futuro . »75 PASQUALE TREMATERRA – Riflessioni sui feromoni degli insetti infestanti le derrate alimentari . »83 AGATINO RUSSO – Limiti e prospettive delle applicazioni di lotta biologica in post-raccolta . »91 GIACINTO SALVATORE GERMINARA, ANTONIO DE CRISTOFARO, GIUSEPPE ROTUNDO – Attività biologica di composti volatili dei cereali verso Sitophilus spp. » 101 MICHELE MAROLI – La contaminazione entomatica nella filiera degli alimenti di origine vegetale: con- trollo igienico sanitario e limiti di tolleranza . » 107 Giornata culturale su: EVOLUZIONE ED ADATTAMENTI DEGLI ARTROPODI CONTRIBUTI DI BASE ALLA CONOSCENZA DEGLI INSETTI ANTONIO CARAPELLI, FRANCESCO NARDI, ROMANO DALLAI, FRANCESCO FRATI – La filogenesi degli esa- podi basali, aspetti controversi e recenti acquisizioni .
    [Show full text]
  • Halona2021r.Pdf
    Terrestrial Arthropod Survey of Hālona Valley, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, August 2020–November 2020 Neal L. Evenhuis, Keith T. Arakaki, Clyde T. Imada Hawaii Biological Survey Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817, USA Final Report prepared for the U.S. Navy Contribution No. 2021-003 to the Hawaii Biological Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bishop Museum was contracted by the U.S. Navy to conduct surveys of terrestrial arthropods in Hālona Valley, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, in order to assess the status of populations of three groups of insects, including species at risk in those groups: picture-winged Drosophila (Diptera; flies), Hylaeus spp. (Hymenoptera; bees), and Rhyncogonus welchii (Coleoptera; weevils). The first complete survey of Lualualei for terrestrial arthropods was made by Bishop Museum in 1997. Since then, the Bishop Museum has conducted surveys in Hālona Valley in 2015, 2016–2017, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. The current survey was conducted from August 2020 through November 2020, comprising a total of 12 trips; using yellow water pan traps, pitfall traps, hand collecting, aerial net collecting, observations, vegetation beating, and a Malaise trap. The area chosen for study was a Sapindus oahuensis grove on a southeastern slope of mid-Hālona Valley. The area had potential for all three groups of arthropods to be present, especially the Rhyncogonus weevil, which has previously been found in association with Sapindus trees. Trapped and collected insects were taken back to the Bishop Museum for sorting, identification, data entry, and storage and preservation. The results of the surveys proved negative for any of the target groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of Cotton Pests
    Common name: Campoletis Common name: Authors Crop Protection Folder Series: 10 of 11 English Version parasitoid Bracon parasitoid Dr. S. Vennila Scientific name : Campoletis Scientific name: Dr. V. K. Biradar chlorideae Bracon greeni Ashm. Division of Crop Protection Uchida Family : Braconidae Central Institute for Cotton Research Family : Ichneumonidae Order : Hymenoptera Nagpur Order : Hymenoptera Host insect (s) : Pink bollworm Mr. M. Sabesh Host insect (s): American Nature of association : Central Institute for Cotton Research (R. S.) bollworm Larval parasitoid Adult of Bracon Coimbatore Nature of association : Campoletis maggot Know Your Native Natural Larval parasitoid Insect pathogens of cotton insect pests & Dr. O. M. Bambawale Enemies of Cotton Insect Pests! Scientific name: National Centre for Integrated Pest Management Nomuraea rileyi New Delhi Host insect (s) : Semi looper & American bollworm Nature of association : Pathogenic to larvae N. rileyi fungus infected larva Campoletis pupa Campoletis adult Scientific name : Nuclear polyhedrosis virus Common name : Rogas parasitoid Host insect (s) : American bollworm Scientific name : Rogas aligarhensis Quadri Nature of association : Pathogenic to larvae Published by Family : Braconidae Dr. B. M. Khadi Order : Hymenoptera Director Host insect (s) : Spotted bollworm Central Institute for Cotton Research Nature of association : Larval parasitoid Post Bag No. 2, Shankar Nagar P. O. Nagpur 440 010 Maharashtra NPV infected larva Rogas pupa Rogas adult In addition to the above dominant natural mortality Produced under factors of cotton pests, there are many more natural control Technology Mission on Cotton Common name : Apanteles parasitoid agents that are of less relative importance that add to the control Mini Mission I (3.1) Scientific name : Apanteles angaleti Mues.
    [Show full text]