Charter School Bond Disclosure Template Part 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charter School Bond Disclosure Template Part 1 NEW ISSUE-FULL BOOK-ENTRY Rating: “…” See “RATING” herein. $................ “STATE” SCHOOL FINANCE AUTHORITY CHARTER SCHOOL REVENUE BONDS (“SAMPLE CHARTER SCHOOL” PROJECT) $................ $................ Series 2014A Series 2014B (Taxable) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on inside cover This cover page contains information for general reference only. It is not intended as a summary of these issues. Investors must read the entire Offering Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. The “Sample State” School Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (“Sample Charter School” Project), Series 2014A, in the aggregate principal amount of $.............(the “Series 2014A Bonds” or the “Tax-Exempt Bonds”) and the “Sample State” School Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (“Sample Charter School” Project), Series 2014B (Taxable), in the aggregate principal amount of $...... (the “Series 2014B Bonds” or the “Taxable Bonds” and, together with the Series 2014A Bonds, the “Bonds”) will be issued by the “Sample State” School Finance Authority (the “Authority”) pursuant to an Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2014 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Authority and “Sample Trustee”, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Authority will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to “Sample Charter School” Charter School, Inc. a “Sample State” nonprofit, public benefit corporation and charter school (the “Borrower”), pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2014, by and between the Authority and the Borrower (the “Loan Agreement”). The Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority payable only out of certain revenues and other amounts held in the funds established by the Indenture (except the Rebate Fund). The obligations of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement are payable from the Gross Revenues (as defined herein) required to be deposited with the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. THE BORROWER MAY NOT CHARGE TUITION AND HAS NO TAXING AUTHORITY. Interest on the Bonds will be payable semiannually on each April 1 and October 1 commencing October 1, 2014. The Bonds are being issued as fully registered bonds and initially will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee for the Depository Trust Company, New York, “Sample State” (‘DTC”). DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds are subject to optional, mandatory and extraordinary redemption prior to maturity as described under “THE BONDS-Redemption” herein. The Bonds constitute special, limited obligations of the Authority and except to the extent payable from Bond proceeds and investment income, are payable solely from certain payments, revenues and other amounts derived by the Authority pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Bonds are secured by a pledge of (a) certain rights and interests of the Authority under and pursuant to the Loan Agreement, (b) certain rights and interests of the Authority under and pursuant to the Deed of Trust, encumbering the K-8 Facility, and all rights and interest of the Authority in the K-8 Facility subject to Permitted Encumbrances, (c) the Pledged Revenues and all rights and interests of the Authority in the Pledged Revenues, subject to Permitted Encumbrances, except certain rights of the Authority set forth in the Loan Agreement, (d) the rights and interests of the Authority and the Corporation in the Lease, except certain rights of the Authority and the Corporation set forth in the Lease, (e) all Funds created in the Indenture (other than the Rebate Fund), subject to certain provisions of the Indenture, and (f) any and all other interests in real or personal property specifically mortgaged, pledged or hypothecated, as and for additional security under the Indenture as set forth therein. Payments to be received from the Charter School by the Corporation under the Lease will be the Corporation’s sole expected source of Pledged Revenues and the Lease is subject to annual appropriation by the Charter School. THE BONDS ARE NOT AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO CONSTITUTE A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OF “SAMPLE STATE” (THE “STATE”) OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY, AND ARE NOT AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PLEDGE OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE STATE, OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, BUT SHALL BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED THEREFOR UNDER THE INDENTURE. NEITHER THE STATE NOR THE AUTHORITY SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE BONDS, OR THE REDEMPTION PREMIUM, IF ANY, OR INTEREST THEREON, EXCEPT FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED THEREFOR UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS SHALL NOT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY OR CONTINGENTLY OBLIGATE THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF TO LEVY OR TO PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION OR TO MAKE ANY APPROPRIATION FOR THEIR PAYMENT. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. NOTHING IN THE INDENTURE, THE ACT OR OTHERWISE IS AN UNDERTAKING BY THE AUTHORITY OR THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF TO FUND THE TRANSFERS DESCRIBED IN THE INTERCEPT NOTICE (DEFINED HEREIN) OR TO MAKE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO THE BORROWER IN ANY AMOUNT OR AT ANY TIME. The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the Authority and received by the Underwriter, subject to prior sale and approval of legality by “Sample Bond Counsel” “Sample State”, Bond Counsel to the Authority, the approval of certain matters for the Authority by the “Sample State Attorney General”, Attorney General of the State of “Sample State”, and the approval of certain matters for the Borrower by the Law Office of “Sample Attorney”, “Sample State”. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Authority by “Sample Disclosure Counsel”, as Disclosure Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by “Sample Underwriter’s Counsel”, “Sample State”, Underwriter’s Counsel. It is expected that the Bonds in definitive form will be available for delivery through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company in New York, New York, on or about February 7, 2014 Dated: Month, Day, Year RBC Capital Markets Piper Jaffrey TD Securities George K. Baum Baird Janney D.A. Davidson & Co. PNC Jefferies Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Ziegler NO DEALER, BROKER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE INSTITUTIONS OR THE UNDERWRITERS TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS, OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AND IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY ANY OF THE FOREGOING. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE INSTITUTIONS AND OTHER SOURCES WHICH ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE AND RELIABLE, BUT NO REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY, OR GUARANTEE IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION IN THIS ii OFFICIAL STATEMENT. THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE FOR INCLUSION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT: THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE REVIEWED THE INFORMATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS PART OF, THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO INVESTORS UNDER FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AS APPLIED TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS TRANSACTION, BUT THE UNDERWRITERS DO NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SUCH INFORMATION. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR THERE BE ANY SALE OF THE BONDS BY ANY PERSON IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR SUCH PERSON TO MAKE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE. THE INFORMATION AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION AND AMENDMENT. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT NOR ANY STATEMENT NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER WILL UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE INSTITUTIONS SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. This Official Statement contains summaries believed to be accurate of certain documents, but reference is hereby made to the actual documents, copies of which are incorporated by reference and are available at the offices of the Trustee, and all such summaries are qualified in their entirety by this reference. Prospective purchasers are referred to the Act, the Charter Schools Act, the Charters of each of the Institutions, the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Custody Agreement, the Mortgage, and the Guaranty, which documents are available for inspection at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee specified herein. During the initial offering period with respect to the Series 2012 Bonds, copies of all such documents in draft or executed form may be obtained by contacting “Sample Underwriter”. The information included herein under the caption “THE BONDS—Book-Entry Only System” concerning DTC has been furnished by DTC for inclusion herein. The information included herein under the captions “THE ISSUER” and “LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS—The Issuer” has been furnished by the Issuer for inclusion herein. The Institutions have furnished all information in this Official Statement and the Appendices attached hereto relating to the Institutions, the Series 2014 Facility and the Estimated Sources and Application of Funds, including all information set forth in the Appendices hereto. All other information included herein has been obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable. This Official Statement contains statements which, to the extent they are not recitations of historical fact, constitute “forward looking statements.” In this respect, the words “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. A number of important factors affecting the Institutions’ financial results could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in the forward looking statements. See “CERTAIN BONDHOLDERS’ RISKS” and “APPENDIX A.” iii MATURITY SCHEDULE $........ “SAMPLE STATE” SCHOOL FINANCE AUTHORITY CHARTER SCHOOL REVENUE BONDS (“SAMPLE CHARTER SCHOOL” PROJECT) $............. Series 2014A $....... 5.00% Bonds Due October 1, 2022- Priced to Yield 4.30% CUSIP XXXXXX XXX $.......... 5.00% Bonds Due October 1, 2033- Priced to Yield 4.83% CUSIP XXXXXX XXX $....
Recommended publications
  • User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide
    2018-2019 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; peer groups; and schools with consecutive years of overall score improvement. Page 1 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website.
    [Show full text]
  • School State 11TH STREET ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL KY 12TH
    School State 11TH STREET ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL KY 12TH STREET ACADEMY NC 21ST CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MO 21ST CENTURY COMMUNITY SCHOOLHOUSE OR 21ST CENTURY CYBER CS PA 270 HOPKINS ALC MN 270 HOPKINS ALT. PRG - OFF CAMPUS MN 270 HOPKINS HS ALC MN 271 KENNEDY ALC MN 271 MINDQUEST OLL MN 271 SHAPE ALC MN 276 MINNETONKA HS ALC MN 276 MINNETONKA SR. ALC MN 276-MINNETONKA RSR-ALC MN 279 IS ALC MN 279 SR HI ALC MN 281 HIGHVIEW ALC MN 281 ROBBINSDALE TASC ALC MN 281 WINNETKA LEARNING CTR. ALC MN 3-6 PROG (BNTFL HIGH) UT 3-6 PROG (CLRFLD HIGH) UT 3-B DENTENTION CENTER ID 622 ALT MID./HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 FARMINGTON HS. MN 917 HASTINGS HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 LAKEVILLE SR. HIGH MN 917 SIBLEY HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 SIMLEY HIGH SCHOOL SP. ED. MN A & M CONS H S TX A B SHEPARD HIGH SCH (CAMPUS) IL A C E ALTER TX A C FLORA HIGH SC A C JONES HIGH SCHOOL TX A C REYNOLDS HIGH NC A CROSBY KENNETT SR HIGH NH A E P TX A G WEST BLACK HILLS HIGH SCHOOL WA A I M TX A I M S CTR H S TX A J MOORE ACAD TX A L BROWN HIGH NC A L P H A CAMPUS TX A L P H A CAMPUS TX A MACEO SMITH H S TX A P FATHEREE VOC TECH SCHOOL MS A. C. E. AZ A. C. E. S. CT A. CRAWFORD MOSLEY HIGH SCHOOL FL A. D. HARRIS HIGH SCHOOL FL A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mileage, Off-Campus Teaching Sites
    Off Campus Teaching Sites MapQuest Driving Shortest Distance/Suggested Route Starting Point: 400 East 2nd Street Mileage (One Mileage (Round Active School District Address way) Trip) Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 475 East Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA 15120 222 445 Annville‐Cleona Area School District 520 S White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Annville Elementary School 205 S. White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 68 136 Cleona Elementary School 50 E Walnut St, Cleona, PA 17042 66 132 Annville Cleona Junior/Senior High School 500 South White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Appalachia IU 8 4500 6th Avenue, Altoona, PA 16602 132 264 Bellefonte Area School District 318 North Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Bellefonte Area High School 830 E. Bishop Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 79 158 Bellefonte Area Middle School 100 North School Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐2396 79 158 Bellefonte Elementary 100 West Linn Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Benner Elementary 490 Buffalo Run Road, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐9789 82 165 Marion Walker Elementary 100 School Drive, Bellefonte PA 16823‐9032 70 140 Pleasant Gap Elementary 230 South Main Street, Pleasant Gap PA 16823 83 165 Bensalem Township School District 3000 Donallen Drive, Bensalem, PA 19020 140 280 Belmont Hills Elementary School 5000 Neshaminy Boulevard, Bensalem, PA 19020 139 278 Cornwells Elementary School 2215 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 282 Samuel K. Faust Elementary School 2901 Bellview Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1311 138 276 Benjamin Rush Elementary School 3400 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 281 Russell C. Struble Elementary School 4300 Bensalem Blvd, Bensalem, PA 19020 143 285 Valley Elementary School 3100 Donallen Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1838 140 280 Robert K.
    [Show full text]
  • No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C
    Column Averages → 31.65 22.02 46.33 School Name PreK-2 Hybrid Choice PreK-2 Digital Choice PreK-2 Digital - No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C. Bryant School 12.50 7.35 80.15 Joseph W. Catharine School 18.50 7.50 74.00 Benjamin B. Comegys School 9.30 11.63 79.07 Sadie Alexander School 67.69 16.59 15.72 Andrew Hamilton School 17.35 25.51 57.14 Avery D. Harrington School 21.55 16.38 62.07 Henry C. Lea School 22.42 9.09 68.48 William C. Longstreth School 32.04 28.16 39.81 Morton McMichael School 48.05 18.18 33.77 S. Weir Mitchell School 45.65 28.99 25.36 Thomas G. Morton School 21.23 10.85 67.92 Samuel Powel School 0.72 0.00 99.28 John M. Patterson School 31.96 44.29 23.74 James Rhoads School 61.49 32.43 6.08 Martha Washington School 49.15 15.25 35.59 Penrose School 33.90 13.56 52.54 Add B. Anderson School 12.24 10.88 76.87 Alain Locke School 18.94 12.12 68.94 Rudolph Blankenburg School 32.65 38.78 28.57 D. Newlin Fell School 36.30 40.00 23.70 Bache-Martin School 72.16 19.89 7.95 F. Amedee Bregy School 33.80 9.86 56.34 George W. Childs School 33.33 40.31 26.36 Stephen Girard School 30.14 19.18 50.68 General George A.
    [Show full text]
  • The School District of Philadelphia
    The School District of Philadelphia Potential Impact of $94.5M Revenue Reduction on School Budgets Methodology and Notes Key Green Text = Can Be Cut Red Text = Cannot Be Cut Notes: The “Enrollment Teachers” category includes Enrollment Driven Prep Teachers. 2011-12 budget data is post mid-year (December 2011) budget cuts. The Operating Budget Allotment in 2011-12 and 2012-13 is equivalent to the Per School and Per Student Allotments in 2010-11. Enrollment numbers are as projected in the spring preceding each budget year for the purpose of developing school budgets. All data is from the Staffing Management System (SMS). Data is as of 4/26/12. What can and can’t be cut? A decrease in operating revenues would have to be offset by cuts in the Operating Budget only, not in Grants. Grants budget information is shown for reference only. This analysis assumes the Enrollment Driven Teachers category is not cuttable because of maximum class sizes in the PFT collective bargaining agreement. This analysis assumes the following are not “cuttable” in FY13 because of state and federal service requirements; the extent of budget cuts that were already made in FY12; and the time that that would be required to reduce costs by changing the School District’s service model. o Gifted Support o Nursing Services o Special Education – High Incidence and Low Incidence o English as a Second Language (ESOL) o Bilingual Counselor Assistants Why are enrollments and poverty rates provided? Enrollment is important for context for Enrollment Driven Teachers (100% enrollment driven) and Operating Budget Allotment (partially enrollment driven).
    [Show full text]
  • Education Outreach Programs Annual Report 2018–19
    Education Outreach Programs Annual Report 2018–19 PB THE BARNES FOUNDATION 2018–19 EDUCATION REPORT I Contents 2 About the Barnes 4 School Outreach Programs in Philadelphia and Camden 6 Look! Reflect! Connect! (Pre-K) 10 Pictures and Words (Grade 3) 13 Art of Looking (Grade 5–6) 16 Artist Voices (Grade 7) 19 Community Programming 19 Puentes a las Artes / Bridges to the Arts (Ages 3–5) 21 Additional Programming and Resources for Teachers and Students 21 Community Connections 22 STEAM Initiatives 24 High School Partnerships 25 Single-Visit Opportunities 25 Teacher Training 27 2018–19 Education Outreach Donors 28 Participating Schools Photos by Michael Perez, Sean Murray (p. 2) and Darren Burton (p. 19, 26) SECTION HEADER About the Barnes The Barnes Foundation was founded in 1922 by Dr. a teaching method that encouraged students to read Recent Highlights Albert C. Barnes “to promote the advancement of art as an artist does and to study its formal elements • Nearly 1.8 million visitors since 2012 education and the appreciation of the fine arts and of light, line, color, and space. Dr. Barnes wrote that horticulture.” As a nonprofit cultural and educa- his approach to education “comprises the observation • 240,000+ visitors in 2018 tional institution, the Barnes shares its unparalleled of facts, reflection upon them, and the testing of • 18,000+ member households in 2018 art collection with the public, organizes special the conclusions by their success in application. It exhibitions, and presents education and public pro- stipulates that an understanding and appreciation • 4 million+ online visitors engaged since the gramming that fosters new ways of thinking about of paintings is an experience that can come only launch of the new website in 2017 human creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • APRIL 28, 2016 I. SRC-1 Proposed
    Final SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING RESOLUTION LIST APRIL 28, 2016 I. SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION SRC-1 Proposed Student Expulsion – E. F. (Updated 4.21.16) SRC-2 Proposed Student Expulsion – Q. M. (Updated 4.21.16) SRC-3 Proposed Student Expulsion – D. P. SRC-4 Proposed Student Expulsion – N. R. SRC-5 Proposed Student Expulsion – A. W. (Updated 4.21.16) SRC-6 Application for Charter Renewal – Harambee Institute of Science and Technology Charter School SRC-7 Application for Charter Renewal – John B. Stetson Charter School; ASPIRA, Inc. of Pennsylvania (Tabled – No Action Taken) SRC-8 Application for Charter Renewal – Mastery Charter School Clymer Elementary (Withdrawn by Staff – No Action Taken) SRC-9 Application for Charter Renewal – Mastery Charter School Shoemaker Campus (Withdrawn by Staff – No Action Taken) SRC-10 Application for Charter Renewal – Mastery Charter School Simon Gratz Campus (Withdrawn by Staff – No Action Taken) SRC-11 Application for Charter Renewal – Olney Charter High School (Withdrawn by SRC Chair – No Action Taken) SRC-12 Application for Charter Renewal – Universal Audenried Promise Neighborhood Partnership Charter School (Withdrawn by SRC Chair – No Action Taken) SRC-13 Application for Charter Renewal – Universal Vare Promise Neighborhood Partnership Charter School (Withdrawn by SRC Chair – No Action Taken) SRC-14 Application for Charter Renewal – YouthBuild Philadelphia Charter School SRC-15 Renaissance Schools Initiative: Renaissance Charter School – Global Leadership Academy Charter School Southwest at Huey SRC-16 Renaissance Schools Initiative: Renaissance Charter School – Great Oaks Charter School at Cooke SRC-17 Renaissance Schools Initiative: Renaissance Charter School – John Wister Mastery Charter School SRC-18 Authorization of Refunding of Existing Variable Debt (Series 2009 C and Series F, G, and H of 2010 Bonds – Substitute New Letters of Credit (Added 4.27.16) II.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngày 8 Tháng 3, 2021 Thân Gởi Các Gia Đình Thuộc Sở Giáo Dục Philadelphia, Tôi Lấy Làm Vui Mừng Thông Bá
    OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT 440 North Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19130 Tiến Sĩ William R. Hite, Jr. Tổng Giám Đốc Sở Ngày 8 tháng 3, 2021 Thân Gởi Các Gia Đình Thuộc Sở Giáo Dục Philadelphia, Tôi lấy làm vui mừng thông báo rằng Liên Đoàn Giáo Viên Philadelphia (PFT) hiện đã hoàn tất việc đánh giá mức độ sẵn sàng cho thêm 45 trường học. Bắt đầu từ thứ hai, ngày 15 tháng 3, 45 trường này sẽ mở cửa trở lại để dạy trực tiếp cho học sinh từ lớp PreK đến lớp 2 nào mà vào mùa thu năm rồi gia đình chúng đã chọn mô hình học tập kết hợp hybrid. Các giáo viên và nhân viên hỗ trợ từ lớp PreK đến lớp 2 của 45 trường này sẽ trở lại trường vào thứ tư, ngày 10 tháng 3 để chuẩn bị chào đón học sinh vào thứ hai tuần sau. Các trường này theo sau nhóm 53 trường đầu tiên mở cửa trở lại cho việc học trực tiếp ngày hôm nay. 45 trường mở cửa học trực tiếp vào ngày 15 tháng 3 là: Alexander Adaire School A.L. Fitzpatrick School General George A. McCall School Rudolph Blankenburg School Benjamin Franklin School Delaplaine McDaniel School Joseph H. Brown School Horatio B. Hackett School Morton McMichael School Lewis C. Cassidy School Haverford Center General George G. Meade School Benjamin B. Comegys School Charles W. Henry School John M. Patterson School Jay Cooke Elementary School Thomas Holme School Thomas M. Peirce School William Cramp School Francis Hopkinson School Samuel Pennypacker School Kennedy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of Accounts Manual
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA Chart Of Accounts Manual Business Rules and Definitions Office of Comptroller May 24, 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 1 3. ABC (Chart of Account) Code Structure ................................................................................................ 1 3.1 Expenditures ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 Revenues ....................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Chart of Account Element Definitions and General Usage ................................................................... 3 4.1 Fund .............................................................................................................................................. 3 4.1.1 Fund Categories .................................................................................................................... 4 4.1.2 Majord Fun Groups and Types – GASB 34 Definitions .......................................................... 5 4.1.3 SDP Fund Groupings .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide
    2016-2017 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; and peer groups. Page 2 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide
    2014-2015 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: SPR Components & Scoring This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main components. Overview It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. City and Peer Ranks This section explains how the SPR compares the scores of different schools. The Peer Rank accounts for differences in the student populations that schools serve and ensures that comparisons between schools are fair and equitable. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and points possible; and peer groups. 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide 2015-2016 School Progress Report User Guide
    2015-2016 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2015-2016 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain (Page 3) are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a school’s (Page 7) report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, (Page 8) Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the (Page 9) District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school’s progress at the overall, (Page 10) domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. City and Peer Ranks This section explains how the SPR compares the scores of different (Page 11) schools. The Peer Rank accounts for differences in the student populations that schools serve and ensures that comparisons between schools are fair and equitable. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and (Page 12) points possible; and peer groups. Page 2 2015-2016 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Information & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evaluated.
    [Show full text]