West Coast Passenger Trains from Vancouver to San Diego, a Revolution Has Occurred

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Coast Passenger Trains from Vancouver to San Diego, a Revolution Has Occurred MAP OF THE MONTH West Coast passenger trains From Vancouver to San Diego, a revolution has occurred. Let someone else sit in traffic! What you’re seeing here is a transfor- Waterfront Sta. 10 mation that’s nothing short of remarkable. Coquitlam WEST COAST B R I T I S H 2 Pacific Central Sta. Amtrak to Portland SAN FRANCISCO Twenty years ago, a map of West Coast EXPRESS ER C O L U M B I A SACRAMENTO 10 VIA to BAY AREA VANCOUVER 2 (CPR) OUV y Amtrak short-haul passenger trains would’ve been Toronto F VANC 7 RAILROADS to Chicago AMTRAK r Mission little more than a blank page. Back then, as sion Cit er Riv City (CPR) 32 Amtrak provided minimal service between CASCADES (CN) Mis (UP) 2 (UP) AMTRAK Oakland and Bakersfield, Calif., and be- er Jct (CN) C A N. CAPITOL 4 VANCOUVER 338 TRAINS tween Portland and Seattle, though it did . U. S. A. CORRIDOR AREA 2 AMTRAK field 14 San Diegans a day to and from Los 1,734 MILES SAN Angeles. The only commuter trains, San Bellingham Auburn Not shown on map: One daily Based on December 2006 timetables 2 JOAQUINS Jose to San Francisco, a service dating from from Amtrak and its state sponsors, and round trip run by VIA Rail Canada Downtown/ on Vancouver Island between Cabral Sta. 1864, were kept running with state money. the local agencies that manage commuter SACRAMENTO 4 Victoria and Courtenay, B.C. Train 40 Martinez STOCKTON These maps chart the 338 weekday com- services and the Capitol Corridor. PUGET was suspended in 2011. muter and intercity passenger trains that In 1995, Amtrak extended intercity SOUND 4 8 San Joaquin Everett St. Sta. 12 trains north of L.A. to San Luis Obispo; AREA Everett OAKLAND Jack London Square today serve West Coast cities from San Di- Amtrak SAN ego to Vancouver, B.C. The network totals south of Portland to Eugene, Ore.; and to Chicago FRANCISCO Coliseum 8 (BNSF) STOCKTON 20 1,734 route-miles! Train counts (revenue north of Seattle to Vancouver, B.C. Metro- 14 Elmhurst OAKLAND moves only) are from public timetables in link added lines to Riverside in 1993, SEATTLE 14 effect in December 2006. Oceanside in 1994, a San Bernardino- SAN FRANCISCO (UP) ALTAMONT COMMUTER Omitted from the tabulations are six Oceanside route in 1995, and a Riverside- SOUNDER Niles EXPRESS 12 Newark overnight trains operated by Amtrak and Fullerton-L.A. service in 2002, while ex- Tacoma 14 / 8 4 4 96 VIA Rail Canada, although they do extend tending the reach of its three original lines. SAN JOSE Santa Clara the network to riders beyond the corridors In 2003, Sounder began running north of 96 / 14 / 8 SAN JOSE Diridon Sta. and in some cases supplement Amtrak’s Seattle. Caltrain, under the management of Gilroy CALTRAIN Tamien intercity service. (For example, the Coast a tri-county agency, pushed south to Gilroy SEATTLE King St. Sta. W A S H I N G T O N 48 8 Starlight’s morning departures provide an in 1992 and rebuilt its railroad to launch Fresno 6 extra frequency southbound from Seattle the “Baby Bullet” express trains in 2004. AMTRAK to Eugene, Ore., and northbound from Los In the mid-2000s, the Pacific Surfliner AMTRAK AMTRAK CASCADES CASCADES ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS Gilroy Angeles to San Luis Obispo, Calif.) Also was Amtrak’s second-busiest route, carry- 8 8 SAN JOAQUINS AMTRAK CORRIDOR SERVICES (UP) omitted is VIA’s now-suspended Vancou- ing 2.6 million riders in 2006, and the Cap- CALTRAIN ver Island service, a single daily round trip itol Corridor was third, with 1.2 million COASTER 12 made with Rail Diesel Cars. riders. Metrolink and Caltrain each moved Tacoma METROLINK While 300 trains may seem like a drop about 10 million riders in 2006. Dome Sta. Vancouver (BNSF) SOUNDER in the bucket compared with the 3,000 If there’s a downside to all this expan- Tacoma Amtrak WEST COAST EXPRESS PORTLAND to Chicago C A L I F O R N I A commuter trains that run in the Northeast sion, it’s that many of the passenger routes 8 AMTRAK LONG-DISTANCE [see the July 2005 TRAINS “Map of the are owned by freight railroads, whose traf- Union Sta. P A Bakersfield Month”], the rise of the West Coast passen- fic has also grown sharply. Millions of dol- C I F I San Luis Obispo ger train has been a success story for a re- lars in Amtrak, state, and local money has P Lancaster C LOS ANGELES O paid for capacity improvements and more A C Amtrak gion in love with its cars. Of course, it was 4 AREA E C A to Chicago N intolerable highway congestion that passenger-train slots. Still, on-time perfor- I O R E G O N 4 er F sa t a s as prompted Western states to look to the pas- mance suffers on some busy routes, and I e (BNSF) C Lanc senger train as an alternative. It took vision without expensive investments, some lines a Clarit O ia Princ ant 22 V 18 and leadership from politicians and public won’t come close to matching the train fre- S C Goleta o administrators at the state and county level quencies found in Chicago and the East. E alv to get the trains going — and a commit- Then again, the East could learn a thing A 10 Mont ment from citizens, who voted “yes” to or two from the trains out West. Along the N Eugene o 24 AMTRAK METROLINK (UP) alv 16 METROLINK bond issues, gasoline and sales tax hikes, Pacific, lifestyle matters, and passenger- 20 PACIFIC San Bernardino Mont 6 and clean-air legislation that included train amenities such as big windows, WiFi Amtrak to Sacramento 10 Burbank (BNSF) SURFLINER LOS ANGELES (UP) th 10 10 or Amtrak funding for passenger rail. service, bike racks, water fountains, and — Moorpark sw 44 Laguna tt 34 San Bernardino Niguel to New Orleans Like flowers blooming in the desert, most important! — cup-holders will be a Chat asse 118 34 B new services appeared: Amtrak’s Capitol welcome surprise to anyone who has ever LOS ANGELES 22 20 (UP) San Juan Capistrano Corridor in 1991; Los Angeles’ Metrolink jammed onto an East Coast commuter Trains per weekday Union Sta. 12 8 16 in 1992; San Diego’s Coaster and Vancou- train or tried squinting through the gun- (Excludes long-distance) 32 12 22 on 1 - 9 t Riverside Oceanside ver’s West Coast Express in 1995; San Jose’s barrel slits of an Amfleet coach window. 28 ood © 2007 Kalmbach Publishing Co., TRAINS: Bill Metzger COASTER P uller tw After all, highway congestion and gas 10 - 19 A AMTRAK F 9 A Only passenger routes shown. Track owners AMTRAK Altamont Commuter Express in 1998; and C in parentheses. Maps not to scale. 22 22 20 - 39 22 25 Seattle’s Sounder in 2000. prices may be the catalyst that gets riders I F 19 16 This material may not be reproduced in any form PACIFIC I without permission from the publisher. 40 - 89 C Orange SURFLINER Established services, meanwhile, added on board the trains, but it’s the inviting O N www.TrainsMag.com 90 and up C SAN DIEGO U. S. A. departures and introduced sharp-looking equipment and convenient service that will E 35 A 0 Scale 80 miles new equipment, thanks to a commitment keep them there. — Matt Van Hattem Irvine M E X. N 25 22 Laguna Niguel.
Recommended publications
  • Commuter Rail System Study
    TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal Bridge
    THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Volume 18 NEWSLETTER OF THE MOUNTAIN EMPIRE MODEL RAILROADERS CLUB Number 5B MAY 2011 BONUS PAGES Published for the Education and Information of Its Membership NORFOLK & WESTERN/SOUTHERN RAILWAY DEPOT BRISTOL TENNESSEE/VIRGINIA CLUB OFFICERS LOCATION HOURS President: Secretary: Newsletter Editor: ETSU Campus, Business Meetings are held the Fred Alsop Donald Ramey Ted Bleck-Doran: George L. Carter 3rd Tuesday of each month. Railroad Museum Meetings start at 7:00 PM at Vice-President: Treasurer: Webmaster: ETSU Campus, Johnson City, TN. John Carter Duane Swank John Edwards Brown Hall Science Bldg, Room 312, Open House for viewing every Saturday from 10:00 am until 3:00 pm. Work Nights each Thursday from 5:00 pm until ?? APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 2 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 3 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE II scheme. The "stripe" style paint schemes would be used on AMTRAK PAINT SCHEMES Amtrak for many more years. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Phase II Amtrak paint schemes or "Phases" (referred to by Amtrak), are a series of livery applied to the outside of their rolling stock in the United States. The livery phases appeared as different designs, with a majority using a red, white, and blue (the colors of the American flag) format, except for promotional trains, state partnership routes, and the Acela "splotches" phase. The first Amtrak Phases started to emerge around 1972, shortly after Amtrak's formation. Phase paint schemes Phase I F40PH in Phase II Livery Phase II was one of the first paint schemes of Amtrak to use entirely the "stripe" style.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report
    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report Public Review Draft October 2017 Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison October 2017 Research and Peer Review Research and Peer Review .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Note on TCRP Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 3 Definition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Commuter Rail Elasticity ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Systems ............................................................................................ 4 Fares ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Employer Programs ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin
    Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin May 1971: As part of its inaugural system, Amtrak operates five daily round trips in the Chicago- Milwaukee corridor over the Milwaukee Road main line. Four of these round trips are trains running exclusively between Chicago’s Union Station and Milwaukee’s Station, with an intermediate stop in Glenview, IL. The fifth round trip is the Chicago-Milwaukee segment of Amtrak’s long-distance train to the West Coast via St. Paul, northern North Dakota (e.g. Minot), northern Montana (e.g. Glacier National Park) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis June 1971: Amtrak maintains five daily round trips in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor and adds tri- weekly service from Chicago to Seattle via St. Paul, southern North Dakota (e.g. Bismark), southern Montana (e.g. Bozeman and Missoula) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis Chicago-Seattle North Coast Tri-weekly Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Hiawatha Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis 6B-1 November 1971: Daily round trip service in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor is increased from five to seven as Amtrak adds service from Milwaukee to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Southern California's Future on Track
    Keeping Southern California’s 25Future on Track CONTENTS Message from the Board Chair .........................1 CEO’s Message .....................................................3 A Quarter Century of Moving People: The Metrolink Story .............................................5 How It All Began ................................................19 Metrolink’s Top Priority: Safety .......................27 WHO WE ARE Environment ........................................................31 Metrolink is Southern California’s regional commuter rail service in its Metrolink Relieves Driving Stress ...................35 25th year of operation. Metrolink is governed by The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Board Members Past and Present ..................40 a joint powers authority made up of an 11-member board representing Metrolink Pioneering Staff the transportation commissions of Still on Board ......................................................47 Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. Metrolink Employees Metrolink operates seven routes Put Customers First ...........................................48 through a six-county, 538-route-mile network with 60 stations. Facts at a Glance ...............................................50 For more information, including how to ride, go to www.metrolinktrains.com MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide safe, efficient, dependable and on-time transportation service that offers outstanding customer experience and enhances quality of life. For
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Vehicle Performance at High Speed and High Cant Deficiency
    Proceedings of the ASME/ASCE/IEEE 2011 Joint Rail Conference JRC2011 March 16-18, 2011, Pueblo, Colorado, USA JRC2011-56066 EXAMINATION OF VEHICLE PERFORMANCE AT HIGH SPEED AND HIGH CANT DEFICIENCY Brian Marquis Jon LeBlanc U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States Ali Tajaddini U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Rail Road Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C., United States ABSTRACT The research for this paper was part of work done for the FRA In the US, increasing passenger speeds to improve trip time to support the FRA Railroad Safety Advisory Committee usually involves increasing speeds through curves. Increasing (RSAC) Track Working Group’s Vehicle Track Interaction speeds through curves will increase the lateral force exerted on (VTI) Task Force. The mission of the VTI task force was to track during curving, thus requiring more intensive track update Parts 213 and 238 of the Code of Federal Regulations maintenance to maintain safety. These issues and other (CFR) regarding rules for high speed (above 90mph) and high performance requirements including ride quality and vehicle cant deficiency (about 5 inches) operations. The task force stability, can be addressed through careful truck design. focused on a number of issues including refinement of VTI Existing high-speed rail equipment, and in particular their safety criteria, track geometry standards, vehicle qualification bogies, are better suited to track conditions in Europe or Japan, procedures and requirements and track inspection in which premium tracks with little curvature are dedicated for requirements, all with a focus on treating the vehicle and track high-speed service.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services
    UC Berkeley Research Reports Title Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rk4p09t Authors Miller, Mark A. Loukakos, Dimitri Publication Date 2001-11-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CALIFORNIA PATH PROGRAM INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California’s Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Mark A. Miller, Dimitri Loukakos California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-34 This work was performed as part of the California PATH Program of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Final Report for MOU 375 November 2001 ISSN 1055-1425 CALIFORNIA PARTNERS FOR ADVANCED TRANSIT AND HIGHWAYS Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Mark A. Miller Dimitri Loukakos November 9, 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was conducted under the sponsorship of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Office of New Technology and Research (ONT&R) (Interagency Agreement #65A0013) and the authors especially acknowledge Bob Justice and Pete Hansra of ONT&R for their support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility in Rail Facilities
    9/7/2017 Accessibility in Rail Facilities Kenneth Shiotani Senior Staff Attorney National Disability Rights Network 820 First Street Suite 740 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-9514 x 126 [email protected] September 2017 1 ADA Transportation Provisions Making Transportation Accessible was a major focus of the statutory provisions of the ADA PART B - Actions Applicable to Public Transportation Provided by Public Entities Considered Discriminatory [Subtitle B] SUBPART I - Public Transportation Other Than by Aircraft or Certain Rail Operations [Part I] 42 U.S.C. § 12141 – 12150 Definitions – fixed route and demand responsive, requirements for new, used and remanufactured vehicles, complementary paratransit, requirements in new facilities and alterations of existing facilities and key stations SUBPART II - Public Transportation by Intercity and Commuter Rail [Part II] 42 U.S.C. § 12161- 12165 Detailed requirements for new, used and remanufactured rail cars for commuter and intercity service and requirements for new and altered stations and key stations 2 1 9/7/2017 What Do the DOT ADA Regulations Require? Accessible railcars • Means for wheelchair users to board • Clear path for wheelchair user in railcar • Wheelchair space • Handrails and stanchions that do create barriers for wheelchair users • Public address systems • Between-Car Barriers • Accessible restrooms if restrooms are provided for passengers in commuter cars • Additional mode-specific requirements for thresholds, steps, floor surfaces and lighting 3 What are the different ‘modes’ of passenger rail under the ADA? • Rapid Rail (defined as “Subway-type,” full length, high level boarding) 49 C.F.R. Part 38 Subpart C - NYCTA, Boston T, Chicago “L,” D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • TROLLEY EXTENSION May Do So Using Any of the Following Methods: Post Until 3/12/2021
    Proposed Major The MTS Board of Directors will also hold a Public Hearing in March 2021 to consider these proposals, Take Service Changes prior to approval of any major service changes. If you wish One to comment on any proposal for the Public Hearing, you TROLLEY EXTENSION may do so using any of the following methods: Post Until 3/12/2021 In Fall 2021, the UC San Diego Blue Line light rail • Testimony at the • Our website, extension will open and expand the San Diego sdmts.com/Trolley-Extension Trolley system from Downtown San Diego to PUBLIC HEARING: the UTC Transit Center, serving nine new Trolley Thursday, March 11, 2021, Please use the comment form UC SAN DIEGO UC San DiegoExecutive DriveUTC stations. Health La Jolla 9:00 a.m. UC San Diego See box below. • U.S. Mail. Send to: MTS is also proposing to change the bus network Central Campus MTS Public Hearing Comments to connect people and communities to the Trolley VA Medical Center extension. Extensive rider and public outreach Blue Line • Telephone Hotline: 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000, was conducted in 2018-2019 to collect ideas and Nobel Drive (619) 595-4912 feedback on potential changes.. The results of that (leave your comments as a San Diego, CA 92101 outreach, combined with detailed data analysis, Balboa Avenue resulted in the proposals detailed in this Take One. message on the voicemail) Clairemont Drive IN SUMMARY: • E-Mail: [email protected] • Current bus routes affected would include: Tecolote Road Routes 8, 9, 27, 30, 44, 50, 105, 150, and Green Line 201/202.
    [Show full text]