DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest for All Forever

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest for All Forever Centralized National Risk Assessment for CANADA FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 1 of 118 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Canada Document reference FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date of approval: 17 December 2015 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Policy and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2015 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 2 of 118 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Canada ............................................. 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Canada ...................................... 5 Risk assessments ..................................................................................................... 6 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood ........................................... 6 Overview ........................................................................................................... 6 Sources of legal timber in Canada ..................................................................... 7 Risk assessment ............................................................................................... 8 Recommended control measures .................................................................... 44 Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights ................................................................................................................... 45 Risk assessment ............................................................................................. 45 Recommended control measures .................................................................... 45 Detailed analysis ............................................................................................. 46 Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted ........................................................................................................ 116 Risk assessment ........................................................................................... 116 Recommended control measures ................................................................ 1188 FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 3 of 118 – Risk assessments that have been finalized for Canada Risk assessment Controlled Wood categories completed? 1 Illegally harvested wood YES Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human 2 YES rights Wood from forests where high conservation values are 3 NO threatened by management activities Wood from forests being converted to plantations or 4 NO non-forest use Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees 5 YES are planted FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 4 of 118 – Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Canada Indicator Risk designation (including functional scale when relevant) Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood 1.1 Low risk 1.2 Low risk 1.3 Low risk 1.4 Low risk 1.5 Low risk 1.6 Low risk 1.7 Low risk 1.8 Low risk 1.9 Low risk 1.10 Low risk 1.11 Low risk 1.12 Low risk 1.13 Low risk 1.14 N/A 1.15 Low risk 1.16 Low risk 1.17 Low risk 1.18 Low risk 1.19 Low risk 1.20 Low risk 1.21 Low risk Controlled wood category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights 2.1 Low risk 2.2 Low risk 2.3 Specified risk for territories claimed by First Nations, Metis or Inuit. Low risk for the rest of Canada. Controlled wood category 3: Wood from forests where high conservation values are threatened by management activities 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Controlled wood category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use 4.1 Controlled wood category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted 5.1 Low risk FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 5 of 118 – Risk assessments Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood Overview NOTE: The Canada CNRA was done at a national level with examples from the provinces included for illustrative purposes. Nearly 90 per cent of Canada’s forests are on public lands, owned and managed on behalf of Canadians by the provincial and territorial governments. Almost two per cent of forest land is under federal jurisdiction and two per cent is owned and managed by Aboriginal peoples. The remaining six per cent of forest land is on private property. The federal government has legislative authority over forest resources where those resources affect, or are affected by, matters related to: the national economy, trade and international relations; federal lands and parks; and the government’s constitutional, treaty, political and legal responsibilities for Aboriginal peoples. The country’s ten provinces and three territories (the territory of Nunavut has little to no forested lands) who own close to 90 per cent of Canada’s forest land, have legislative authority over the conservation and management of forest resources on these public lands. This authority affords the provincial and territorial governments the ability to regulate and enforce how Canada’s forests are managed. Detailed files on all applicable legislation for each province, as well as forest classifications, permit types and how timber monitoring is done is available at http://www.sfmcanada.org/en/forest-products/legal-forest-products. Canada is internationally recognized as a leader in forest governance. A very recent (Sept 2014) guideline prepared and endorsed by the Australian and Canadian Governments recognizes Canada’s legislative framework provides assurances that timber products from Canadian forests are of low risk of being illegally harvested. It specifies the probability of illegal logging throughout Canada is negligible. This guideline is intended to assist businesses importing regulated timber products from Canada into Australia in complying with the Australian Illegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012 (see http://www.daff.gov.au/forestry/policies/illegal-logging/information-resources) A study entitled, “Global Environmental Forest Policies: Canada as a Constant Case Comparison of Select Forest Practice Regulations” by Dr. Cashore of Yale University in 2004 compared forest policy and regulations across 38 jurisdictions around the world and “… the regime of forest management and conservation in Canada, is, in the aggregate, one of the most advanced in the world.” (see a summary at fpac.ca/publications/2004_HowCanadaCompares.pdf) A study entitled, “Comparison of Selected Forest Certification Standards” by the Finnish research company Indufor Oy in 2009 compared forest legislation and forest certification schemes in 11 jurisdictions around the world and found “Canada (British Columbia and Ontario) and in Australia (New South Wales) are the FSC-CNRA-CAN V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2015 – 6 of 118 – countries with the most demanding legislation on the studied elements.” Further, the study found that “…the strength of the legislation contributes to the strictness of the standard more than does the type of the standard (FSC or PEFC).” Canada has a robust system of procedures to ensure that its forests are governed in the public interest. Several reports and studies have confirmed that Canada’s forest management policies and practices are among the most stringent in the world: • Currently, the Spanish Timber Importers´ Association (AEIM) assesses Canada as a very low risk for illegal logging (see maderalegal.info/fichas) • In 2014, the World Resources Institute referred to Canada’s record of the lowest prevalence of suspicious log supply and corruption of any country (see wri.org/sites/default/files/wri_report_4c_report_legalityguide_final320.pdf) • In 2013, Forest Trends reported Canada as a low risk supply country for timber imports into the EU (see forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_4085.pdf) • In 2012, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute reported that Canada has the lowest occurrence of suspicious log supply and corruption of any country (see sustainableforestproducts.org/Legality) • In 2010, the UK Timber Trade Federation classified Canadian wood products as low risk with respect to illegality, and rated our documentation as highly reliable (see Country Guidance: Canada, UK Timber Trade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Brief Historical Perspective of Urban Forests in Canada As Published in Histoires Forestières Du Québec, Hiver 2015 Vol
    Urban Forest Series, Volume I A Brief Historical Perspective of Urban Forests in Canada As published in Histoires forestières du Québec, Hiver 2015 Vol. 7, No 1, Pages 27-32 Michael Rosen, R.P.F. President, Tree Canada Introduction In recent years, a greater amount of interest has been in expressed in urban forests – partly as a result of increasing urbanization but also due to new threats including the invasive insect, emerald ash borer. This history reveals much about the country itself - the reluctance to move past the image of “hewers of wood” has made urban forestry a young “specialty field” within forestry in Canada. According to Dean (2015), European urban forests with their long lines of identical trees speak of the human control of na- ture while in North America, rows of street trees served to tame the wilderness as muddy frontier roads were “brought into line”. Others point to the “democratization of the automobile, densification, climate change and invasive insects” as powerful North American themes which pose the greatest threat to urban forests (Lévesque, 2014, p 6). Urban forests in Canada have been dominated by three themes: superficial support by the provincial and federal governments, individuals’ commitment to developing urban forests of excellence, and awareness and action fueled by natural disaster. Canada – the Urban People in a Forest Nation The world looks to Canada as a forest leader – and with good reason. With 417.6 million ha of forest (10% of the world) Canada leads in many of the standard, industrial forestry measures: “timber-pro- ductive forest land”, “allowable annual cut”, “area burned by forest fire”, and “area of certified forest”.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Perspectives on Indigenous Peoples' Forestry
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ FORESTRY: LINKING COMMUNITIES, COMMERCE AND CONSERVATION Proceedings of the International Conference Vancouver, Canada June 4-6, 2002 Global Perspective on Indigenous Forestry: Linking Communities, Commerce and Conservation 1 Conference Proceedings—June 4-6 2002 Vancouver, Canada __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ............................................................................... 4 SUMMARY OF PRESENTATIONS ................................................................................. 7 Tuesday, June 4, 2002......................................................................................................... 7 SESSION 1:THE STATUS AND FUTURE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ FORESTRY: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES......................................7 David Kaimowitz, Making Forests Work For Communities ...................................... 7 Ed John, Legal Issues and Global Processes.............................................................. 8 Miriam Jorgensen, Beyond Treaties: Lessons for Community Economic Development................................................................................................................ 8 SESSION 2:ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIGENOUS FORESTRY......9 Harry Bombay, Issues and Opportunities for Indigenous Forestry
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Industry Lecture Presented
    SPACE, TIME AND PERSPECTIVES IN FORESTRY' KENNETH A. ARMSON2 Forest Industry Lecturer Forestry Program The University of Alberta November 1981 FOREST INDUSTRY LECTURE SERIES NO. 8 'Forest Industry Lecture presented at the University of Alberta, November 26, 1981 'Chief Forester, Forest Resources Group, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto 1 THE FOREST INDUSTRY LECTURES Forest industry in northwestern Canada is cooperating with Alberta Energy and Natural Resources to provide funds to enrich the Forestry Program of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry at the University of Alberta through sponsorship of noteworthy speakers. The Forest Industry Lecture Series was started during the 1976-77 term as a seminar course. Desmond I. Crossley and Maxwell T. MacLaggan presented the first series of lectures. The contribution of these two noted Canadian foresters is greatly appreciated. Subsequent speakers in the series have visited for periods of up to a week, with all visits highlighted by a major public address. It has indeed been a pleasure to host such individuals as C. Ross Silversides, W. Gerald Burch, Gustaf Siren, Kenneth F.S. King, F.L.C. Reed, Gene Namkoong, and Roger Simmons. The subjects of their talks are listed on the last page. This paper contains Mr. Kenneth A. Armson's major public address given on 26 November 1981. 2 We would like to take this opportunity to express our thanks again to the sponsors of this program — we appreciate very much their willing and sustained support: Alberta Forest Products Association - Edmonton British Columbia Forest Products Ltd. - Vancouver North Canadian Forest Industries Ltd. - Grande Prairie Prince Albert Pulpwood Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Activity and the Environment: Forests in Canada
    Catalogue no. 16-201-X ISSN 1923-6751 Human Activity and the Environment 2017 Human Activity and the Environment: Forests in Canada Release date: March 14, 2018 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website, www.statcan.gc.ca. You can also contact us by email at [email protected] telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following toll-free numbers: • Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136 • National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 • Fax line 1-514-283-9350 Depository Services Program • Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 • Fax line 1-800-565-7757 Standards of service to the public Note of appreciation Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada has long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the developed standards of service that its employees observe. To citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are be produced without their continued co-operation and goodwill. also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under “Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.” Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2018 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Interests and Power As Drivers of Community Forestry Community of Drivers As Power and Interests Devkota Raj Rosan
    “The concept of Community forestry promises to bring the forces of the local Rosan Raj Devkota forest users into a joint effort to maintain sustainable forests. The analysis shown in Devkota’s PhD thesis refers to the limitations of this concept drawn by powerful stakeholders. The theoretical sound and empirical rich analysis Interests and Power as provides the information needed to improve community forestry by a realistic Drivers of Community Forestry power strategy in practice.” - Prof. Dr. Max Krott, Chair of Forest and Nature Conservation Policy A Case Study of Nepal Georg-August-University Goettingen Rosan Raj Devkota Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry Community of Drivers as Power and Interests Devkota Raj Rosan ISBN 978-3-941875-87-6 Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Rosan Raj Devkota Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License 3.0 “by-nd”, allowing you to download, distribute and print the document in a few copies for private or educational use, given that the document stays unchanged and the creator is mentioned. You are not allowed to sell copies of the free version. erschienen in der Reihe der Universitätsdrucke im Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2010 Rosan Raj Devkota Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry A Case Study of Nepal Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2010 Bibliographische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.ddb.de> abrufbar. Global Forest Decimal Classification: 922.2, 906 Centre for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture and Forestry (CeTSAF)- Tropenzentrum Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Büsgenweg 1 37077 Göttingen Address of the Author Rosan Raj Devkota e-mail: [email protected] This work is protected by German Intellectual Property Right Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Note: Community Forestry in Canada
    Briefing Note: Community Forestry in Canada lobal economic instability, the need for local isolation and limited access to services and G adaptation to climate change impacts, and economic opportunities can make them vulnerable Supreme Court rulings over Aboriginal and to large-scale disturbances (i.e., economic Treaty Rights have drawn attention to community downturns, climate change). Many communities are dissatisfaction with centralized approaches to concerned with the environmental impacts of natural resource management. Communities industrial forest development in their region.3 across Canada seek opportunities for increased control over and benefits from Across Canada, interest in community natural resources. involvement in the forestry sector has been growing over the past decade. Community Community forests offer local forest forests are not new to Canada, and viable examples management opportunities. They support social, date back many decades in some provinces, such as environmental, and economic sustainability through: Agreement Forests in Ontario (1920s), forestry a) local decision-making, b) local economic cooperatives in Quebec (1940) and municipal resilience and benefit sharing opportunities, and c) forests in British Columbia (1950s).4 sustainable forest uses. This brief outlines diverse forms of community forests in Canada, and offers The National Aboriginal Forestry Association recommendations to increase local benefits through measured a steady rise in timber volume harvested community forests. by Aboriginal interests
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Years of Community-Based Forestry
    176 176 FAO FORESTRY PAPER Forty years of Forty years of community-based forestry community-based forestry Forty years of community-based forestry – A review its extent and effectiveness A review of its extent and effectiveness A review of its extent and effectiveness Since the 1970s and 1980s, community-based forestry has grown in popularity, based on the concept that local communities, when granted sufcient property rights over local forest commons, can organize autonomously and develop local institutions to regulate the use of natural resources and manage them sustainably. Over time, various forms of community-based forestry have evolved in different countries, but all have at their heart the notion of some level of participation by smallholders and community groups in planning and implementation. This publication is FAO’s rst comprehensive look at the impact of community-based forestry since previous reviews in 1991 and 2001. It considers both collaborative regimes (forestry practised on land with formal communal tenure requiring collective action) and smallholder forestry (on land that is generally privately owned). The publication examines the extent of community-based forestry globally and regionally and assesses its effectiveness in delivering on key biophysical and socioeconomic outcomes, i.e. moving towards sustainable forest management and improving local livelihoods. The report is targeted at policy-makers, practitioners, researchers, communities and civil society. ISSN 0258-6150 ISBN 978-92-5-109095-4 ISSN 0258-6150 FAO FORESTRY
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Carbon Challenges in the Western Canadian Forestry Industry a Review of Current Forest Carbon Accounting Practices and Forest Management Issues
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Graduate Capstones 2019-08-19 Examining Carbon Challenges in the Western Canadian Forestry Industry A Review of Current Forest Carbon Accounting Practices and Forest Management Issues Mitchell, Joshua Reid http://hdl.handle.net/1880/111110 report University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Examining Carbon Challenges in the Western Canadian Forestry Industry: A Review of Current Forest Carbon Accounting Practices and Forest Management Issues. by Joshua Reid Mitchell A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2019 © Joshua Reid Mitchell, 2019 Abstract Considering the increased international emphasis on the role of forests in climate change mitigation efforts, it is important to examine the challenges facing forest management regimes as they begin integrating regulations for forest carbon and climate change values. Large-scale natural disturbances and a business-first regulatory approach have contributed to forests in British Columbia and Alberta devolving from perennial carbon sinks into net carbon emission sources. An examination of provincial forest management regulations and policies suggests that current forestry regulations in western Canada don’t adequately consider forest carbon issues and may fall short of international sustainable forest management standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region
    Who owns our forests? Forest ownership in the ECE region Who owns our forests? Forest ownership in the ECE region COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright© 2020 United Nations and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. All rights reserved worldwide. The publication of submissions from member States in this study does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries as may be referred to in any of the submissions. Party submissions may contain data, opinions and statements from various information sources. The UNECE or FAO do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any data, opinion, statement or other information provided in any of the submissions. This work is co-published by UNECE and FAO. ABSTRACT This study examines forest ownership in the ECE region. Based on data on 35 countries, and the first to include all forest ownership categories, this study investigates the changing nature and patterns of forest ownership, the ways in which governance and social structures influence forest owners and users, as well as forest management. Within the limits of data availability and harmonization, the publication provides an overview of, and a new baseline for, understanding the diversity and dynamics of forest ownership in the ECE region. ECE/TIM/SP/43/Rev.1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION eISBN 978-92-1-004828-6 ISSN 1020-2269 eISSN 2518-6450 United Nations publication issued by the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) ii Foreword FOREWORD BY UNECE AND FAO Considering the critical role of forests in housing biodiversity, providing a source of livelihood for millions of people in our region, and combating catastrophic consequences of climate change, there is an important question that merits attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in the Forest: Rural Livelihoods and Forest Law Enforcement
    Forest Perspectives 3 Justice in the forest Justice Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (FLEG) has been justified as a way of benefiting the poor by improving state revenues from forests, but the direct social impacts have not been given much attention. This study constitutes an attempt to fill the gap. Based on reviews of community experiences in Bolivia, Cameroon, Canada, Honduras, Indonesia and Nicaragua, it shows how the extent of forest-based livelihoods is often under- appreciated. The laws that affect the way people use forests are often contradictory and restrict livelihoods. Moreover, laws tend to be selectively developed and applied in favour of large-scale forestry, while laws, which secure community rights in forests, enforcement law forest and livelihoods Rural are commonly absent, ignored or too onerous to be widely used. Lack of adequate legal protection of community rights makes much small-scale forest use ‘illegal’. Illegal forest use, including by communities, tends to be enmeshed in wider political economies, so major players tend to be politically protected while local communities are vulnerable. Enforcement has sometimes focused narrowly on forestry laws to the neglect of laws that secure rural livelihoods. Crude enforcement measures have reinforced social exclusion and tended to target poor people while avoiding those who are well connected. Trade-based FLEG measures may also ignore the social implications. The study recommends future FLEG initiatives be developed in transparent ways, with broad civil society engagement. They should give special attention to the rural poor by addressing the full range of laws relating to forests, adopting rights-based approaches and promoting legal reform, rule of law and access to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management a Way to Strengthen Results-Based Management of National Forest Programmes
    Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper 37 Using criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management A way to strengthen results-based management of national forest programmes ©FAO/Giulio Napolitano Using criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management A way to strengthen results-based management of national forest programmes Authors: Cecilia Julve Larrubia International consultant specializing in natural resources management Kimberly Ross Kane International development consultant specializing in organizational development, monitoring and evaluation, and results-based management (RBM) Bernhard Wolfslehner Head of Central-East and South-East European Regional Office, European Forest Institute (EFI) Richard Guldin Senior Research Fellow, Society of American Foresters Ewald Rametsteiner Head of the Forest Governance Unit, Forestry Department, FAO Coordination: Ewald Rametsteiner Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 201 7 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. © FAO, 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Forest Certification the US Pacific Northwest and British Columbia, Canada
    Assessing the Effectiveness of Forest Certification the US Pacific Northwest and British Columbia, Canada by Anna Tikina A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Forestry) UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 2006 ©Anna Tikina 2006 Abstract Proponents of forest certification view the system as a tool for sustainable forest management. Opponents declare forest certification "green-washing" or as an ineffective waste of resources. This study was prompted by concerns about the ability of forest certification to induce effective change in forest practices. The study applied a classification of regime effectiveness to evaluate the impacts of forest certification. Changes in behaviours (behavioural effectiveness) constitute the core of regime effectiveness. A secondary objective was to explore the settings that influence obtaining forest certification in the region. A mailed survey to certified and non-certified forest managing entities (public agencies, forest industry and non-industrial private forest owners) in the US Pacific Northwest inquired about the degree of behavioural changes in their forest practices related to certification. The results of this study reveal that the practices of forest managing entities in the US Pacific Northwest have undergone relatively small changes. The type and magnitude of changes differed among public, forest industry and non-industrial private forest owners. Non-certified industry holdings changed more than their certified counterparts. However, certified non- industrial private forest owners indicated more change than non-certified ones. Case studies were conducted in British Columbia to evaluate the transferability of the results. While some behavioural changes have been found, forest certification was more effective in other aspects - in goal attainment and through process and constitutive effectiveness.
    [Show full text]