Celebration in the End, 1.3 Million Buildings While Work Contin- Streetcar Subway and Sever- ■ Cubic Metres of Material Was Ued Underground
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C. -
Service Improvements for 2002
SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11 -
3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO
3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO Office Availabilities SPACE ADDITIONAL RENT (SQ FT.) AVAILABILITY/COMMENTS suite 1009: 12,652 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 1010: 2,792 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 3032/3034: 4,012 sq. ft. $18.82 Can be demised into 2,162 sq. ft. or 1,850 sq. ft. suite 4000: 15,467 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4065: 1,200 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4076: 1,918 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 6000: 3,551 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out PLEASE CONTACT LISTING AGENTS FOR NET RENT BRENDAN J. SULLIVAN* MYAH OLLEK CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage Vice President Sales Representative 145 King Street West, Suite 1100 416 847 3262 416 815 2353 Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8 [email protected] [email protected] 416 362 2244 www.cbre.com *Sales Representative // 3080 Yonge Street // Toronto, On About the Building & Area 401 RANEE AVENUE LAWRENCE STATION A L L SHEPPARD W STATIONE N R LAWRENCE AVENUE WEST O A BAYVIEW AVENUE D BLYTHWOOD ROAD MT. PLEASANT ROAD D YONGE STREET U GLENCAIRN AVENUE P LAWRENCE W STATION L E X AVENUE ROAD A V MARLEE AVENUE BATHURST STREET E DUFFERIN STREET N U E A GLENCAIRN STATIONL L E N R O EGLINTON STATION A D CHAPLIN CRESCENT EGLINTON AVENUE WEST DAVISVILLE ROAD CASTLEFIELD ROAD GLENCAIRN STATION OAKWOOD AVENUE O DAVISVILLE STATION R I O L E P VEHICLES PER DAY SUBWAY RIDERSHIP AVERAGE HOUSEHOLDA INCOME POPULATION R K W 39,825 $224,159A 373,866 25,590 Y LAWRENCE YONGE ST N/O LAWRENCE AVE | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 2012-2013 | SOURCE: TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION 1 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 5 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS OFFICE ROGERS ROAD ST. -
Rapid Transit on Sheppard Avenue East
Rapid Transit on Sheppard Avenue East Expert Panel Meeting February 17, 2012 TTC Ridership Profile • 58% are female • 41% have no driver’s licence • 34% have no vehicle in the household • 66% are employed • 32% are students • 43% live in an apartment/condominium Importance of Transit to Cities • increase City’s competitive (World Bank, OECD, FCM, UN) stimulate economic growth, attract business • generate, support employment • provide accessibility for mobility impaired • reduce automobile congestion, costs • reduce pollution, improve air quality • influence land uses, create moreefficient city Ridership Growth Strategy Peak Service Improvements Ridership Growth Strategy Additional Off-Peak Service Planning Fundamentals - I Transportation ↔ Land Use land use, density creates travel demand determines required transportation service transportation service / investment improves access to land increases land value shapes land use, density, development Planning Fundamentals - II Demand ↔ Capacity travel demand determines required capacity plus room for growth choice of appropriate transit type Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review (1975) sample alternative Accelerated Rapid Transit Study (1982) GO Advanced Light Rail Transit (1983) Network 2011 (1986) Let’s Move (1990) Network 2011 / Let’s Move • 1994 – groundbreaking for Eglinton, Sheppard Subways •1995 – Eglinton Subway stopped, filledin •1996 – Sheppard Subway shortened to Don Mills •1996 – Spadina Subway extended one stop to Downsview Network 2011 / Let’s Move What Was -
Route Period / Service Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New 511 Bathurst Early AM to 7:00 8'
Service Changes Effective Sunday, January 5, 2020 (version 2) Route Period / Service M-F Saturday Sunday Headway R.T.T. Vehicles Headway R.T.T. Vehicles Headway R.T.T. Veh Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Where running times are shown as "A+B", the first part is the scheduled driving time and the second part is the scheduled "recovery" time (layover) usually provided to round out the trip time as a multiple of the headway. Vehicle Types: C: CLRV F: Flexity B: Bus AB: Artic Bus T: Train Seasonal Changes All changes implemented for the holiday season in December will end, and schedules will revert to those used in November-December 2019 except where noted. The extra Christmas service to the Distillery District on 504 King and 121 Front-Esplanade will be removed. Vehicle Type Changes 511 Bathurst Early AM to 7:00 8' 56+8 8F AM Peak / S-S Early Morning 5'40" 7'15" 58+10 67+12/13 12C 11F 7'15" 8'45" 37+7 41+11/12 6C 6F M-F Midday / S-S Morning 6' 7' 54+12 65+12 11C 11F 7'15" 8' 47+11 51+13 8C 8F 7' 8'30" 43+6 49+10/11 7C 7F PM Peak / S-S Afternoon 6' 7'45" 60+12 73+12/13 12C 11F 5'20" 6' 54+10 67+11 12C 13F 6' 7' 50+10 57+13 10C 10F Early Evening 7'15" 8'30" 52+13 61+15/16 9C 9F 6'20" 7'15" 51+12 61+11/12 10C 10F 7'45" 9' 46+8 51+12 7C 7F Late Evening 8' 9'15" 38+10 52+12/13 6C 7F 8'30" 9'30" 49+11 59+17 7C 8F 9' 9'20" 39+6 46+10 5C 6F Carhouse Allocations Route assignments to carhouses will be changed so that all routes based at Leslie use pantographs including on their trips to and from service. -
Annual Report 1986
REPORT A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION TABLE 0 F CONTENTS Letter from the Commission 2 Letter from TTC Management 3 A Commitment to Excellence 4 Serving the Public 6 Operating and Maintaining 10 the System Planning for the Future 12 Financial Overview 14 Revenue 16 Expenses 17 Expenses by Function 18 Capital Expenditures 19 Financing 20 Financial Statements December 31, 1986 21 Statement of Revenue and Expenses 21 Balance Sheet 22 Cover: Driver Bill Gorry. a 16-year Statement of Changes 23 veteran with the TTC. in Financial Position Notes to Financial Statements 24 10-Year Financial and Operating Statistics 26 TTC Management Directory 28 LETTER FROM THE COMMISSION o: Mr. Dennis Flynn, (Presidents' Conference Committee) cars, Chairman, and Councillors of the Municipal which have served our patrons well for many ity of Metropolitan Toronto years. One hundred and twenty-six new air conditioned subway cars will also enter ser vice in 1987 and 1988. These new vehicles represent the TTC's commitment to constant LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: renewal of the system to ensure the highest Julian Porter, QC I am proud to present the 1986 Annual standards of service and safety. !Chairman) Report of the Toronto Transit Commission. Throughout its 65-year history the TTC has It has been an award-winning year. The always been able to blend the best of the past TTC's years of planning, building, operating with the technology of the present and the and maintaining the system to provide the ideas of the future. This past is prologue to a best possible service to riders were rewarded challenging future that will call upon the with five major honours, including the Out TTC's considerable experience as important standing Achievement Award given by the decisions approach on transportation priori American Public Transit Association. -
Commission Report Macro
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT SEPTEMBER 2014 UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. TTC MONTHLY SCORECARD 2 2. COMMENTARY AND CURRENT ISSUES 5 3. CUSTOMER MEASURES AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROGRESS 18 4. FINANCIAL COMMENTARY 22 5. CRITICAL PROJECTS 26 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION – MONTHLY SCORECARD Key Performance Latest Current Indicator Description Frequency Measure Current Target Status Trend Ref. # CSS Customer Satisfaction Survey Quarter Q2 72% TBD 2.2 Customer Journeys Customer Trips Period P7 39.939M 40.550M 2.3 Punctuality – Subway and Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) P7 94.7% 96.0% Line 1 (Yonge-Univ-Spadina) Headway + 3 minutes Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 96.6% 97.0% Line 2 (Bloor-Danforth) Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 99.3% 98.0% Line 4 (Sheppard) Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 97.6% 96.0% Line 3 (SRT) Period 2.4.2 Punctuality – Bus, Streetcar, and Wheel-Trans Bus Headway +/- 3 minutes Period P7 66.1% 65.0% 2.5.1 P7 66.1% 70.0% Streetcar Headway +/- 3 minutes Period 2. 5.2 Wheel-Trans Within 10 minutes of schedule Period P7 85.3% 90.0% 2.5.3 Safety and Security Lost Time Injuries Injuries / 100 Employees Period P7 2.65 TBD 2.6.1 Customer Injuries Injury incidents / 1M Vehicle Boardings Period P7 1.45 NA 2.6.2 Behavioural Safety Index Safety Focused Behaviour Period TBD 2.6.3 Offences against Customers Assault, theft, other Period P7 39 NA 2.6.4 Offences against Staff Assault, threat, other Period P7 31 NA 2.6.5 People Attendance Employee Absence Period P7 6.46% < 6.50% 2.7.1 Operator Hires Actual vs. -
TCRP Report 4
41 CHAPTER 3 INTERPRETATION, APPRAISAL, AND APPLICATION MERIT ASSESSMENT OF OBSERVATION AIDS highest, with the others rated progressively lower. By using this approach, all factors can be addressed in the merit The relative merits of the existing observation approaches assessments without lower importance factors skewing the (which were identified during the site investigations) and the results. Table 3 lists all criteria used in the merit assessments most suitable, technically feasible conceptual observation and the assigned weighting factors. approaches were assessed. This assessment was made using evaluation criteria developed on the basis of a wide range of operational procedures, equipment and facility configurations, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA and passenger behavior patterns. Observations made during the site visits and information collected using the survey As introduced above, the assessment criteria were grouped questionnaire were used to develop these criteria. Although into six categories. The following paragraphs define the the criteria are general and cannot address all of the nuances assessment criteria in each of these categories as well as the of individual operations, they represent a consensus of the weighting factor applied and the general approach used in requirements of observation aids. Because some criteria are scoring. more significant than others, operational significance factors were applied to weight the more significant areas. In performing these assessments, each observation aid Observation Requirements approach was first analyzed individually relative to the criterion and assigned a grade that was multiplied by the Platform Approach weighting factor to obtain a factored grade. When this process was completed for all observation aids and evaluation criteria, As a train approaches the station, the track and the platform the relative merits of each were compared. -
Improving Mobility with Rapid Transit
Improving Mobility with Rapid Transit www.CodeRedTO.com Who is CodeRedTO? • Toronto residents advocating for: – Transit expansion that helps the most people and happens faster – Honest, factual discussions of pros, cons, and costs – Increased, stable, predictable, funding to build and run better transit • Stay informed! – www.CodeRedTO.com – @CodeRedTO on Twitter, CodeRedTO on Facebook • Founders: Joe Drew, Cameron MacLeod, Laurence Lui (now inactive) • All volunteer, and no conflicts of interest • No funds or “talking points” from any group or councillor • Available to present facts for any group or MPP who invites us HOW DID WE GET HERE? 3 Reasons. 1. We have a congestion problem The problem is growing: Ridership TTC Sheppard subway • Average daily Toronto 47,000 commute is 80 minutes Ottawa O-Train 11,500 • No room for new roads but TTC Eglinton buses 78,100 we will have more commuters as population Ottawa Transitway 49,500 grows TTC Finch buses 38,100 • Congestion is a PEOPLE TTC Sheppard buses 27,100 thing, not a CAR thing (Toronto’s Yonge subway carries over 700k/day) 2. We have a funding problem Our funding is limited: Funding over 4 years ($ millions) • Toronto’s cancelled Total Prov + Fed Vehicle Registration Capital Funding $8,700 Tax raised about $40M/year Metrolinx 5 in 10 Light Rail Plan $8,700 Rejected Sheppard • Toronto’s Land $3,700 Transfer Tax raises subway plan about $300M/year Land Transfer Tax $1,200 Cancelled Vehicle • Subways cost $160 $350M/km to build Registration Tax 3. We have an approval problem 1910: Referendum -
Commission Report Macro
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2009 SUBJECT: YONGE SUBWAY EXTENSION –ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING COSTS AND RIDERSHIP/CAPACITY ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission consider this report in conjunction with the companion report entitled “Yonge Subway Extension - Final Report on Transit Project Assessment Process – Approval of Staff Recommendations” and forward the report directly to Toronto City Council for consideration at its meeting on January 27/28, 2009, noting that: a) Information related to the comments of Mr. Junkin and the results of the January 20, 2009 public meeting will be the subject of a separate report from the Chief General Manager directly to City Council. b) This report has been prepared jointly by City and TTC Staff. FUNDING Refer to the funding statement in the report entitled “Yonge Subway Extension – Final Report on Transit Project Assessment Process – Approval of Staff Recommendations”. BACKGROUND At the December 17, 2008 Commission meeting, the Commission approved the following motions with respect to the Yonge Subway Extension project: 1. Noting the complexity of the project and the multiple and diverse implications of the project for the TTC, staff be requested to report to the next TTC Commission meeting and the Executive Committee of the City on the implications and possibilities that may be provided by using an Individual EA process or a Class EA process to review this project (see Discussion, Section g). 2. That staff be requested to report back to the Commission in January on (see Discussion, Sections c and h): • The projected operating cost of the completed project; • Likely inter-regional fare scenarios; • Expected ridership figures on opening day; and • Impacts to the Yonge Extension from GO Transit expansion projects, specifically in the Yonge Corridor. -
97 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
97 bus time schedule & line map 97 Davisville Station View In Website Mode The 97 bus line (Davisville Station) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Davisville Station: 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM (2) Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West: 12:01 AM - 11:31 PM (3) Wilson Ave at Yonge St: 12:16 AM - 11:46 PM (4) Yonge St at Queens Quay East North Side: 5:52 AM - 5:52 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 97 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 97 bus arriving. Direction: Davisville Station 97 bus Time Schedule 46 stops Davisville Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:22 AM - 11:40 PM Monday 12:07 AM - 11:36 PM Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West 200 Hilda Ave, Toronto Tuesday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Steeles Av / Tangreen Crt Wednesday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM 212 Steeles Avenue West, Toronto Thursday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Steeles Av Stop # 3719 Friday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Yonge St / Steeles Av Saturday 12:03 AM - 11:52 PM Yonge Street, Toronto Yonge St at Athabaska Ave 6600 Yonge Street, Toronto 97 bus Info Yonge St / Moore Park Av Direction: Davisville Station 6210 Yonge Street, Toronto Stops: 46 Trip Duration: 37 min Yonge St at Patricia Ave Line Summary: Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West, 6062 Yonge Street, Toronto Steeles Av / Tangreen Crt, Steeles Av Stop # 3719, Yonge St / Steeles Av, Yonge St at Athabaska Ave, Yonge St / Drewry Av Yonge St / Moore Park Av, Yonge St at Patricia Ave, 20 Drewry Avenue, Toronto Yonge St / Drewry Av, 5800 Yonge St, Yonge St At Hendon Ave (Finch Station), Yonge St At Finch Ave, -
September 2012 I
Client Project Team Project Manager Bill Dawson, TTC Project Team Trevor Pitman, TTC Paul Millett, TTC Mike Wehkind, City of Toronto Vince Alfano, City of Toronto HDR Project Team Principal Tyrone Gan, P.Eng - HDR Project Manager Tyrone Gan, P.Eng - HDR Technical Team Karen Freund, P.Eng, PMP, LEED AP,HDR Jonathan Chai, P.Eng HDR Conor Adami, EIT, HDR Carl Wong P.Eng, HDR Melanie Hare, Urban Strategies Craig Lametti, Urban Strategies Peter Norman, Altus Group Quality Control Karen Freund, LEED AP, P.Eng - HDR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Downtown Rapid Transit Expansion Study (DRTES) is to assess future rapid transit needs based on anticipated growth in Toronto in accordance with the City’s Official Plan, and to identify and assess potential rapid transit improvements into and within the downtown area of Toronto. A. Problem Statement Transit serving the downtown core is reaching the limits of its practical capacity today, and, with the GTAH continuing to grow and develop, the need for improvements to existing transit service is clear. Both Metrolinx (in the Regional Transportation Plan) the City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) have identified a number of potential infrastructure, operational and policy improvements to provide additional transit capacity into, and within Downtown Toronto. However, recent studies have identified the need to look at additional opportunities to enhance rapid transit, particularly into the downtown area. Within the downtown core, the existing population of 71,000 is projected to increase by 83% to 130,000 by 2031. During the same period, employment is expected to grow from the current 315,000 to 404,000 (28% increase) by 2031.