Celebration in the End, 1.3 Million Buildings While Work Contin- Streetcar Subway and Sever- ■ Cubic Metres of Material Was Ued Underground

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Celebration in the End, 1.3 Million Buildings While Work Contin- Streetcar Subway and Sever- ■ Cubic Metres of Material Was Ued Underground 8 MONDAY, MARCH 29, 2004 Birth of a subway Ever since Yonge Street ond scheme, only an unfin- was little more than a dirt ished station exists today, lo- highway ending at Lake On- cated directly below Queen tario, it has been Toronto’s subway station. main north-south artery. The federal government Horse-drawn trams first was expected to subsidize 20 came to Yonge in 1861, cour- per cent of the costs to build tesy of Toronto Street Rail- the subway, but the money way Company, followed 30 never arrived. The city went years later by the electric ahead anyway, scaling back streetcars. the proposal to just the The idea of running trains Yonge route. beneath the street was first Thanks to post-war short- proposed between 1909 and ages of building material, 1912, but it was the Second construction began two World War that proved the years late in 1949. The work need for a subway line. launch ceremony took place Wartime factory workers on Sept. 8 of that year, host- were pouring onto Toronto’s ed by Monty Hall, who later extensive but overwhelmed became known to North streetcar system, and Yonge Americans as the host of the Street became a tangle of television show Let’s Make multi-car trams and auto- A Deal. mobiles. At the launch site, On- To prevent the city from tario’s then Lieutenant-Gov- choking on its own traffic, ernor, Ray Lawson, climbed TORSTAR NEWS SERVICE the then Toronto Trans- inside a pile driver and On March 30, 1954, Canada's first subway train pulled out of Davisville station loaded with riders — and witnessed by portation Commission pro- pulled a lever to pound the throngs of spectators. posed a “rapid transit sub- first “soldier” beam into way” beneath Yonge Street place. All the local radio sta- boring machine, a large chasing technology similar to the mayor together pushed a running from Eglinton Av- tions carried the entire event trench was dug into Yonge what was being run on the lever forward, changing a enue south to Front Street live. The official party then Street, and utility pipes were London Underground. nearby track signal from where it would connect to moved to the Royal York relocated — some of them Toronto’s first subway cars amber to green. The subway Union Station — the city’s Hotel while the workers with difficulty as they did arrived in the Port of Mon- was officially open. central transportation hub. began the real job of excava- not appear on any map. Steel treal in 1953, and made their Six hundred invited guests Toronto voters over- tion. cross-beams were used to journey to Toronto by freight boarded the inaugural train, whelmingly approved con- “Cut-and-cover” was cho- support a heavy wooden train. and Torontonians would struction of an underground sen as the technique to build deck, allowing traffic to re- take over a quarter million line on Jan. 1, 1946, along the underground portions of turn to the street. CANADA’S FIRST rides that day. “Eglinton to with a plan for a Queen the 7.4 km line. Far less ex- The construction was dis- SUBWAY OPENS Union in 12 Minutes” the streetcar subway. Of the sec- pensive than using a tunnel ruptive not only to automo- newspaper headlines cried, biles and local business, but Ontario Premier Leslie although the first trip actual- to the backbone of the city’s Frost and Toronto Mayor ly took 14 minutes. Previous- streetcar network as Yonge Allan Lamport officially ly, that trip on the Yonge cars were diverted around opened the Yonge subway at streetcar took 30 minutes — the work zones to nearby Davisville station around assuming traffic was streets. The phrase “Side- 11:00 a.m. on March 30, favourable. walk Superintendent” was 1954. Metropolitan Toronto At 1:30 pm. the Yonge sub- coined for citizens who daily Chairman Frederick Gar- way opened to the waiting fed their curiosity by watch- diner was also in attendance, public. Those who had taken ing work in the trench. The along with crowds of citi- the streetcar to work took TTC even produced a manu- zens, TTC employees and the subway home. The Yonge al for the most avid onlook- print, radio and newsreel streetcar line, established in ers, explaining the building journalists. Toronto’s first 1861, faded from existence process. television station did not between 1:30 pm and As construction headed start broadcasting until Au- 2:00 that afternoon. north from Front Street, gust of that year. JAMES BOW & ED DRASS crews ran into solid rock, In a speech that echoes a FOR METRO TORONTO stretching as far north as Transfer from the opening half century later, TTC SEE PART TWO Queen Street. This required day of the Yonge subway Chairman W.C. McBrien's OF TTC HISTORY TOMORROW dynamite charges to remove line. called for the immediate it, and blasts occurred twice commencement of construc- daily, at noon and 4:30 pm. was taken to support the tion on the Queen Street celebration In the end, 1.3 million buildings while work contin- streetcar subway and sever- ■ cubic metres of material was ued underground. Once the al other sweeping measures The Special Anniversary removed from the route, subway tunnel was com- to reduce downtown conges- train for the public leaves much of it trucked to Ash- plete, the buildings got their tion, including fringe park- Eglinton Station at about bridges Bay on Lake Ontario. cellar floors back. ing lots, one-way streets and 10:35 a.m. tomorrow. This About 12,700 metric tons The Yonge subway was to the adoption of staggered train will stop at all sta- of reinforcing steel and 1.4 have been finished by 1953, working hours. tions from Eglinton to million bags of cement were but the Korean War inter- In his words, the Yonge Union. used to create the train tun- vened and a steel shortage Street subway line was “not Events at Union station nels and stations. dragged the work on until the final solution of Toronto's will include: ■ The cut-and-cover tech- 1954. The final cost of the traffic problems. It is only A minute of silence in nique still required the de- route came to $67 million. the start of combating this recognition of those who molition of many homes, al- While work was under- monster. Many other (rapid were injured or killed in though it left developable way below street level, TTC transit) lines will have to be subway construction. ■ land behind once the tunnel officials were searching for built in the future.” The Unveiling of Canada was complete. When the new subway cars. Turning chairman went on to warn Post's new TTC subway subway passed beneath down trains from the United that the TTC could not afford stamp. ■ buildings that weren’t to be States, they finally settled on to build more subway lines Dedication and locking demolished — including the Gloucester Railway Car- without government assis- of a time capsule com- areas around Bloor and St. riage and Wagon Company tance. memorating the event. Clair stations — great care of Gloucester, England, pur- Finally, the premier and 6 TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 2004 BORROW UP TO PAGER PLUS $ .00 1000 a friend can always reach you, your UNTIL PAYDAY family knows how to find you • Choice of numeric pager BAD CREDIT? NO CREDIT? • Free Voice Mail ! Subway 50 today • Free Activation ! NO PROBLEM! • Service From $5.00 Fifty years ago today, 97% Instantly Approved Torontonians went below Per Month street level to marvel at their by phone/fax/internet • FREE SAMEDAY For Only modern new subway. At 50% off 1st loan with this ad DELIVERY! 2:30 p.m., the very last 645-LOAN (5626) $30 Yonge streetcar — until then or incl tax www.tgipayday.ca a very common sight with its 1436 Danforth Ave. passenger trailer — departed Eglinton for Front Street. Call Today!416.798.7271 Signs proclaiming it to be the last run were so large that most of the invited DO YOU HAVE LOTS OF CREDIT CARDS & LOANS party of rail enthusiasts rode AND YOU CAN’T HANDLE THEIR PAYMENTS?? in the second car, just to be able to see out. - All your income going to bills. Subway Day, or “S-Day,” - Everyday there is fight & argument at home. heralded the end of streetcar - Creditors and collection agencies are calling you and they service not only on Yonge, are threatening to take legal actions. but on many lines that - Your salary is being garnished. would eventually become THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS TO BANKRUPTCY bus routes. With the subway, We can save you from threatening phone calls, the TTC’s electrical demands garnishment and reduce your debts to 40% interest free created a strain on the city’s Call us and live a peaceful debtfree life hydro-electric supply — has- Confidentiality Guaranteed tening the eventual with- drawal of streetcars from CREDIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Church, Front and Bay Phone: (416) 780-1020 Streets. The phenomenon of TORSTAR NEWS SERVICE FILE PHOTO disappearing Toronto trams The Bloor-Danforth line opened in 1966, when this photo was taken of a TTC guide ex- would not cease until citi- plaining the new route to riders FORGET PIN NUMBERS, zens rallied to protect them JUST DIAL 10-10-620. two decades later. versity Avenue from Union After years of detours, Station to St. George and dust and inconvenience, a Bloor. Yonge Street reopening cere- The University subway .7 ¢ mony was scheduled for Oct. was initially underused, and 20, 1954, only to be derailed until the opening of the per minute* Italyas low as by Hurricane Hazel.
Recommended publications
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Improvements for 2002
    SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO
    3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO Office Availabilities SPACE ADDITIONAL RENT (SQ FT.) AVAILABILITY/COMMENTS suite 1009: 12,652 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 1010: 2,792 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 3032/3034: 4,012 sq. ft. $18.82 Can be demised into 2,162 sq. ft. or 1,850 sq. ft. suite 4000: 15,467 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4065: 1,200 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4076: 1,918 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 6000: 3,551 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out PLEASE CONTACT LISTING AGENTS FOR NET RENT BRENDAN J. SULLIVAN* MYAH OLLEK CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage Vice President Sales Representative 145 King Street West, Suite 1100 416 847 3262 416 815 2353 Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8 [email protected] [email protected] 416 362 2244 www.cbre.com *Sales Representative // 3080 Yonge Street // Toronto, On About the Building & Area 401 RANEE AVENUE LAWRENCE STATION A L L SHEPPARD W STATIONE N R LAWRENCE AVENUE WEST O A BAYVIEW AVENUE D BLYTHWOOD ROAD MT. PLEASANT ROAD D YONGE STREET U GLENCAIRN AVENUE P LAWRENCE W STATION L E X AVENUE ROAD A V MARLEE AVENUE BATHURST STREET E DUFFERIN STREET N U E A GLENCAIRN STATIONL L E N R O EGLINTON STATION A D CHAPLIN CRESCENT EGLINTON AVENUE WEST DAVISVILLE ROAD CASTLEFIELD ROAD GLENCAIRN STATION OAKWOOD AVENUE O DAVISVILLE STATION R I O L E P VEHICLES PER DAY SUBWAY RIDERSHIP AVERAGE HOUSEHOLDA INCOME POPULATION R K W 39,825 $224,159A 373,866 25,590 Y LAWRENCE YONGE ST N/O LAWRENCE AVE | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 2012-2013 | SOURCE: TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION 1 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 5 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS OFFICE ROGERS ROAD ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit on Sheppard Avenue East
    Rapid Transit on Sheppard Avenue East Expert Panel Meeting February 17, 2012 TTC Ridership Profile • 58% are female • 41% have no driver’s licence • 34% have no vehicle in the household • 66% are employed • 32% are students • 43% live in an apartment/condominium Importance of Transit to Cities • increase City’s competitive (World Bank, OECD, FCM, UN) stimulate economic growth, attract business • generate, support employment • provide accessibility for mobility impaired • reduce automobile congestion, costs • reduce pollution, improve air quality • influence land uses, create moreefficient city Ridership Growth Strategy Peak Service Improvements Ridership Growth Strategy Additional Off-Peak Service Planning Fundamentals - I Transportation ↔ Land Use land use, density creates travel demand determines required transportation service transportation service / investment improves access to land increases land value shapes land use, density, development Planning Fundamentals - II Demand ↔ Capacity travel demand determines required capacity plus room for growth choice of appropriate transit type Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review (1975) sample alternative Accelerated Rapid Transit Study (1982) GO Advanced Light Rail Transit (1983) Network 2011 (1986) Let’s Move (1990) Network 2011 / Let’s Move • 1994 – groundbreaking for Eglinton, Sheppard Subways •1995 – Eglinton Subway stopped, filledin •1996 – Sheppard Subway shortened to Don Mills •1996 – Spadina Subway extended one stop to Downsview Network 2011 / Let’s Move What Was
    [Show full text]
  • Route Period / Service Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New 511 Bathurst Early AM to 7:00 8'
    Service Changes Effective Sunday, January 5, 2020 (version 2) Route Period / Service M-F Saturday Sunday Headway R.T.T. Vehicles Headway R.T.T. Vehicles Headway R.T.T. Veh Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Where running times are shown as "A+B", the first part is the scheduled driving time and the second part is the scheduled "recovery" time (layover) usually provided to round out the trip time as a multiple of the headway. Vehicle Types: C: CLRV F: Flexity B: Bus AB: Artic Bus T: Train Seasonal Changes All changes implemented for the holiday season in December will end, and schedules will revert to those used in November-December 2019 except where noted. The extra Christmas service to the Distillery District on 504 King and 121 Front-Esplanade will be removed. Vehicle Type Changes 511 Bathurst Early AM to 7:00 8' 56+8 8F AM Peak / S-S Early Morning 5'40" 7'15" 58+10 67+12/13 12C 11F 7'15" 8'45" 37+7 41+11/12 6C 6F M-F Midday / S-S Morning 6' 7' 54+12 65+12 11C 11F 7'15" 8' 47+11 51+13 8C 8F 7' 8'30" 43+6 49+10/11 7C 7F PM Peak / S-S Afternoon 6' 7'45" 60+12 73+12/13 12C 11F 5'20" 6' 54+10 67+11 12C 13F 6' 7' 50+10 57+13 10C 10F Early Evening 7'15" 8'30" 52+13 61+15/16 9C 9F 6'20" 7'15" 51+12 61+11/12 10C 10F 7'45" 9' 46+8 51+12 7C 7F Late Evening 8' 9'15" 38+10 52+12/13 6C 7F 8'30" 9'30" 49+11 59+17 7C 8F 9' 9'20" 39+6 46+10 5C 6F Carhouse Allocations Route assignments to carhouses will be changed so that all routes based at Leslie use pantographs including on their trips to and from service.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1986
    REPORT A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION TABLE 0 F CONTENTS Letter from the Commission 2 Letter from TTC Management 3 A Commitment to Excellence 4 Serving the Public 6 Operating and Maintaining 10 the System Planning for the Future 12 Financial Overview 14 Revenue 16 Expenses 17 Expenses by Function 18 Capital Expenditures 19 Financing 20 Financial Statements December 31, 1986 21 Statement of Revenue and Expenses 21 Balance Sheet 22 Cover: Driver Bill Gorry. a 16-year Statement of Changes 23 veteran with the TTC. in Financial Position Notes to Financial Statements 24 10-Year Financial and Operating Statistics 26 TTC Management Directory 28 LETTER FROM THE COMMISSION o: Mr. Dennis Flynn, (Presidents' Conference Committee) cars, Chairman, and Councillors of the Municipal­ which have served our patrons well for many ity of Metropolitan Toronto years. One hundred and twenty-six new air­ conditioned subway cars will also enter ser­ vice in 1987 and 1988. These new vehicles represent the TTC's commitment to constant LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: renewal of the system to ensure the highest Julian Porter, QC I am proud to present the 1986 Annual standards of service and safety. !Chairman) Report of the Toronto Transit Commission. Throughout its 65-year history the TTC has It has been an award-winning year. The always been able to blend the best of the past TTC's years of planning, building, operating with the technology of the present and the and maintaining the system to provide the ideas of the future. This past is prologue to a best possible service to riders were rewarded challenging future that will call upon the with five major honours, including the Out­ TTC's considerable experience as important standing Achievement Award given by the decisions approach on transportation priori­ American Public Transit Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Report Macro
    TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT SEPTEMBER 2014 UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. TTC MONTHLY SCORECARD 2 2. COMMENTARY AND CURRENT ISSUES 5 3. CUSTOMER MEASURES AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROGRESS 18 4. FINANCIAL COMMENTARY 22 5. CRITICAL PROJECTS 26 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION – MONTHLY SCORECARD Key Performance Latest Current Indicator Description Frequency Measure Current Target Status Trend Ref. # CSS Customer Satisfaction Survey Quarter Q2 72% TBD 2.2 Customer Journeys Customer Trips Period P7 39.939M 40.550M 2.3 Punctuality – Subway and Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) P7 94.7% 96.0% Line 1 (Yonge-Univ-Spadina) Headway + 3 minutes Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 96.6% 97.0% Line 2 (Bloor-Danforth) Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 99.3% 98.0% Line 4 (Sheppard) Period 2.4.1 Headway + 3 minutes P7 97.6% 96.0% Line 3 (SRT) Period 2.4.2 Punctuality – Bus, Streetcar, and Wheel-Trans Bus Headway +/- 3 minutes Period P7 66.1% 65.0% 2.5.1 P7 66.1% 70.0% Streetcar Headway +/- 3 minutes Period 2. 5.2 Wheel-Trans Within 10 minutes of schedule Period P7 85.3% 90.0% 2.5.3 Safety and Security Lost Time Injuries Injuries / 100 Employees Period P7 2.65 TBD 2.6.1 Customer Injuries Injury incidents / 1M Vehicle Boardings Period P7 1.45 NA 2.6.2 Behavioural Safety Index Safety Focused Behaviour Period TBD 2.6.3 Offences against Customers Assault, theft, other Period P7 39 NA 2.6.4 Offences against Staff Assault, threat, other Period P7 31 NA 2.6.5 People Attendance Employee Absence Period P7 6.46% < 6.50% 2.7.1 Operator Hires Actual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 4
    41 CHAPTER 3 INTERPRETATION, APPRAISAL, AND APPLICATION MERIT ASSESSMENT OF OBSERVATION AIDS highest, with the others rated progressively lower. By using this approach, all factors can be addressed in the merit The relative merits of the existing observation approaches assessments without lower importance factors skewing the (which were identified during the site investigations) and the results. Table 3 lists all criteria used in the merit assessments most suitable, technically feasible conceptual observation and the assigned weighting factors. approaches were assessed. This assessment was made using evaluation criteria developed on the basis of a wide range of operational procedures, equipment and facility configurations, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA and passenger behavior patterns. Observations made during the site visits and information collected using the survey As introduced above, the assessment criteria were grouped questionnaire were used to develop these criteria. Although into six categories. The following paragraphs define the the criteria are general and cannot address all of the nuances assessment criteria in each of these categories as well as the of individual operations, they represent a consensus of the weighting factor applied and the general approach used in requirements of observation aids. Because some criteria are scoring. more significant than others, operational significance factors were applied to weight the more significant areas. In performing these assessments, each observation aid Observation Requirements approach was first analyzed individually relative to the criterion and assigned a grade that was multiplied by the Platform Approach weighting factor to obtain a factored grade. When this process was completed for all observation aids and evaluation criteria, As a train approaches the station, the track and the platform the relative merits of each were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Mobility with Rapid Transit
    Improving Mobility with Rapid Transit www.CodeRedTO.com Who is CodeRedTO? • Toronto residents advocating for: – Transit expansion that helps the most people and happens faster – Honest, factual discussions of pros, cons, and costs – Increased, stable, predictable, funding to build and run better transit • Stay informed! – www.CodeRedTO.com – @CodeRedTO on Twitter, CodeRedTO on Facebook • Founders: Joe Drew, Cameron MacLeod, Laurence Lui (now inactive) • All volunteer, and no conflicts of interest • No funds or “talking points” from any group or councillor • Available to present facts for any group or MPP who invites us HOW DID WE GET HERE? 3 Reasons. 1. We have a congestion problem The problem is growing: Ridership TTC Sheppard subway • Average daily Toronto 47,000 commute is 80 minutes Ottawa O-Train 11,500 • No room for new roads but TTC Eglinton buses 78,100 we will have more commuters as population Ottawa Transitway 49,500 grows TTC Finch buses 38,100 • Congestion is a PEOPLE TTC Sheppard buses 27,100 thing, not a CAR thing (Toronto’s Yonge subway carries over 700k/day) 2. We have a funding problem Our funding is limited: Funding over 4 years ($ millions) • Toronto’s cancelled Total Prov + Fed Vehicle Registration Capital Funding $8,700 Tax raised about $40M/year Metrolinx 5 in 10 Light Rail Plan $8,700 Rejected Sheppard • Toronto’s Land $3,700 Transfer Tax raises subway plan about $300M/year Land Transfer Tax $1,200 Cancelled Vehicle • Subways cost $160 $350M/km to build Registration Tax 3. We have an approval problem 1910: Referendum
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Report Macro
    Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2009 SUBJECT: YONGE SUBWAY EXTENSION –ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING COSTS AND RIDERSHIP/CAPACITY ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission consider this report in conjunction with the companion report entitled “Yonge Subway Extension - Final Report on Transit Project Assessment Process – Approval of Staff Recommendations” and forward the report directly to Toronto City Council for consideration at its meeting on January 27/28, 2009, noting that: a) Information related to the comments of Mr. Junkin and the results of the January 20, 2009 public meeting will be the subject of a separate report from the Chief General Manager directly to City Council. b) This report has been prepared jointly by City and TTC Staff. FUNDING Refer to the funding statement in the report entitled “Yonge Subway Extension – Final Report on Transit Project Assessment Process – Approval of Staff Recommendations”. BACKGROUND At the December 17, 2008 Commission meeting, the Commission approved the following motions with respect to the Yonge Subway Extension project: 1. Noting the complexity of the project and the multiple and diverse implications of the project for the TTC, staff be requested to report to the next TTC Commission meeting and the Executive Committee of the City on the implications and possibilities that may be provided by using an Individual EA process or a Class EA process to review this project (see Discussion, Section g). 2. That staff be requested to report back to the Commission in January on (see Discussion, Sections c and h): • The projected operating cost of the completed project; • Likely inter-regional fare scenarios; • Expected ridership figures on opening day; and • Impacts to the Yonge Extension from GO Transit expansion projects, specifically in the Yonge Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    97 bus time schedule & line map 97 Davisville Station View In Website Mode The 97 bus line (Davisville Station) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Davisville Station: 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM (2) Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West: 12:01 AM - 11:31 PM (3) Wilson Ave at Yonge St: 12:16 AM - 11:46 PM (4) Yonge St at Queens Quay East North Side: 5:52 AM - 5:52 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 97 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 97 bus arriving. Direction: Davisville Station 97 bus Time Schedule 46 stops Davisville Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:22 AM - 11:40 PM Monday 12:07 AM - 11:36 PM Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West 200 Hilda Ave, Toronto Tuesday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Steeles Av / Tangreen Crt Wednesday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM 212 Steeles Avenue West, Toronto Thursday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Steeles Av Stop # 3719 Friday 12:03 AM - 11:36 PM Yonge St / Steeles Av Saturday 12:03 AM - 11:52 PM Yonge Street, Toronto Yonge St at Athabaska Ave 6600 Yonge Street, Toronto 97 bus Info Yonge St / Moore Park Av Direction: Davisville Station 6210 Yonge Street, Toronto Stops: 46 Trip Duration: 37 min Yonge St at Patricia Ave Line Summary: Hilda Ave at Steeles Ave West, 6062 Yonge Street, Toronto Steeles Av / Tangreen Crt, Steeles Av Stop # 3719, Yonge St / Steeles Av, Yonge St at Athabaska Ave, Yonge St / Drewry Av Yonge St / Moore Park Av, Yonge St at Patricia Ave, 20 Drewry Avenue, Toronto Yonge St / Drewry Av, 5800 Yonge St, Yonge St At Hendon Ave (Finch Station), Yonge St At Finch Ave,
    [Show full text]
  • September 2012 I
    Client Project Team Project Manager Bill Dawson, TTC Project Team Trevor Pitman, TTC Paul Millett, TTC Mike Wehkind, City of Toronto Vince Alfano, City of Toronto HDR Project Team Principal Tyrone Gan, P.Eng - HDR Project Manager Tyrone Gan, P.Eng - HDR Technical Team Karen Freund, P.Eng, PMP, LEED AP,HDR Jonathan Chai, P.Eng HDR Conor Adami, EIT, HDR Carl Wong P.Eng, HDR Melanie Hare, Urban Strategies Craig Lametti, Urban Strategies Peter Norman, Altus Group Quality Control Karen Freund, LEED AP, P.Eng - HDR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Downtown Rapid Transit Expansion Study (DRTES) is to assess future rapid transit needs based on anticipated growth in Toronto in accordance with the City’s Official Plan, and to identify and assess potential rapid transit improvements into and within the downtown area of Toronto. A. Problem Statement Transit serving the downtown core is reaching the limits of its practical capacity today, and, with the GTAH continuing to grow and develop, the need for improvements to existing transit service is clear. Both Metrolinx (in the Regional Transportation Plan) the City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) have identified a number of potential infrastructure, operational and policy improvements to provide additional transit capacity into, and within Downtown Toronto. However, recent studies have identified the need to look at additional opportunities to enhance rapid transit, particularly into the downtown area. Within the downtown core, the existing population of 71,000 is projected to increase by 83% to 130,000 by 2031. During the same period, employment is expected to grow from the current 315,000 to 404,000 (28% increase) by 2031.
    [Show full text]