GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IPR PROTECTION IN

© ARS-PATENT 2013 “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IPR PROTECTION IN RUSSIA |

Russia is a member of all most important International Conventions, Treaties and Agreements, like Paris Convention, WIPO Convention, TRIPS, РСТ, PLT, Madrid Agreement and Protocol, Singapore Treaty, TLT, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, etc.

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STRUCTURE OF RUSSIAN LEGISLATION for protection of Rights |

STRUCTURE OF THE RUSSIAN LEGISLATION for Intellectual Property Rights Protection

CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CRIMINAL CODE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF COMMERCIAL COURT PROCEDURE CODE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCEDURE Special Acts, e.g. Act on Protection of Competition New: Decisions of the Russian Supreme Commercial Court

Government Enactments, e.g. Statute of Patent Fees Administrative Regulations for the RU PTO Activity part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STRUCTURE OF RUSSIAN LEGISLATION for Intellectual Property Rights Protection | cont.

CIVIL CODE PART IV: RIGHTS TO THE RESULTS OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY AND TO MEANS OF INDIVIDUALIZATION

Art. 1225 – 1551

Completely dedicated to IPR matters

Last amendments – 2008

Further changes are expected by the end of 2013

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) |

STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA Inventions: The dynamics of filing and examination of patent applications 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Filed with the RU PTO, totally including: 41849 38564 42500 41414 44211 Russian applicants 27712 25598 28722 26495 28701 Foreign applicants 14137 12966 13778 14919 15510 Examined, totally 38909 40966 41031 42860 42054 Granting decisions, including: 29903 32144 30998 32250 32428 Russian applicants 22668 23502 21307 22339 21752 Foreign applicants 7235 8642 9691 9911 10676 Refusal decision, including: 1230 959 963 844 873 Russian applicants 1078 816 809 728 693 Foreign applicants 152 143 154 116 180 Decisions to withdraw the application, including: 6888 6982 8095 8687 6848 Russian applicants 4503 4060 4161 5161 3975 Foreign applicants 2385 2922 3934 3526 2873 part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Inventions: The number of valid Russian patents as of 31.12.2012

Valid as of 31.12.2011 168558 Number of patents for inventions granted in 2012 32880

Terminated in 2012 (after the period of validity and / or for non-payment 19923 annual maintenance fee, or in effect on the decisions of RU PTO)

Valid as of 31.12.2012 181515

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Utility Models: The dynamics of filing and examination of UM applications 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Filed with the RU PTO, totally including: 10995 11153 12262 13241 14069 Russian applicants 10483 10728 11757 12584 13479 Foreign applicants 512 425 505 657 590 Examined, totally 10715 11953 11285 12541 13410 Granting decisions, including: 10000 11094 10514 11614 12282 Russian applicants 9555 10710 10059 11090 11766 Foreign applicants 445 384 455 524 516 Refusal decision, including: 25 42 20 0 56 Russian applicants 25 39 20 0 52 Foreign applicants 0 3 0 0 4 Decisions to withdraw the application, 690 817 751 927 1072 including: Russian applicants 648 775 724 887 1033 part 1 | ForeignGENERAL OVERVIEW applicants OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA 42 42 27“ARS UNA − SPECIES40 MILLE”39 | www.ars - patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Utility Models: The number of valid Russian UM patents as of 31.12.2012

Valid as of 31.12.2011 46876

Number of patents for UM granted in 2012 11671

Terminated in 2012 (after the period of validity and / or for non-payment 7801 annual maintenance fee, or in effect on the decisions of RU PTO)

Valid as of 31.12.2012 50746

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

.

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Industrial Designs: The dynamics of filing and examination of designs applications 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Filed with the RU PTO, totally including: 4711 3740 3997 4197 4640 Russian applicants 2356 1972 1981 1913 1928 Foreign applicants 2355 1768 2016 2284 2712 Examined, totally 5194 5460 4557 4101 4025 Granting decisions, including: 4360 4538 3940 3400 3374 Russian applicants 2273 2055 1940 1485 1342 Foreign applicants 2087 2483 2000 1915 2032 Refusal decision, including: 179 120 112 143 140 Russian applicants 139 99 94 103 100 Foreign applicants 40 21 18 40 40 Decisions to withdraw the application, 655 802 505 558 511 including: Russian applicants 495 614 392 403 375 part 1 | ForeignGENERAL OVERVIEW applicants OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA 160 188 113“ARS UNA −155 SPECIES MILLE”136 | www.ars - patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Industrial Designs: The number of valid Russian ID patents as of 31.12.2012

Valid as of 31.12.2011 21295

Number of patents for ID granted in 2012 3381

Terminated in 2012 (after the period of validity and / or for non-payment 2046 annual maintenance fee, or in effect on the decisions of RU PTO)

Valid as of 31.12.2012 22630

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Trade Marks and Service Marks: The dynamics of filing and examination of TM applications

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Applications for registration of marks, totally, 57112 50107 56848 59717 61923 including: Russian applicants 30024 26448 32735 33252 34851 Foreign applicants, including: 27088 23659 24113 26465 27072 International marks for which legal protection is claimed in the RF under the Madrid Agreement or 16738 15113 14289 16083 15875 Protocol Examined totally, including: 50586 55852 53408 54993 57528 Granting decisions 43002 46440 43920 39553 41830 Refusal decisions 7333 9106 8950 9145 10424 Withdrawal decisions 251 306 538 328 791 Withdrawal and refusal on the formal examination 4211 4635 6828 5967 4483 part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com STATIC DATA OF IP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA (Annual report for 2012) | cont.

Trade Marks and Service Marks: The dynamics of TM registrations

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number of Registered Marks, totally 36617 36436 35178 35954 40106 including: From Russian applicants 19895 19585 20116 16311 19284 From foreign applicants 16722 16851 15062 19643 20822 of all of that International marks for which legal protection is claimed in the RF 8518 8101 6019 12724 13067 under the Madrid Agreement or Protocol Number of TM which term of validity was 6431 6690 9554 11915 11746 extended, Totally, including from Russian applicants 3550 4243 6119 8525 7852 From foreign applicants 2881 2447 3435 3390 3894 Valid registrations as of 31.12.2012 222208 246607 268165 281784 296631 part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA |

PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA

Civil Code Article 1225. Protectable Results of Intellectual Activity and Means of Individualization 1. Results of intellectual activity and equated to them means of individualization of legal persons, goods, work, services, and enterprises that are provided with legal protection (intellectual property) are: 1] Works of science, literature, and art; 2] Computer programs (software); 3] Databases; 4] Performances; 5] Phonograms;

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

6] Communication over the air or by cable of radio or television transmissions (broadcast by organizations of over-the-air or cable broadcasting); 7] Inventions; 8] Utility models; 9] Industrial designs; 10] Selection attainments; 11] Topology of integrated circuits; 12] Secrets of production (know-how); 13] Company names; 14] Trademarks and service marks; 15] Appellation of origin of goods; 16] Commercial designations.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

Civil Code Article 1349. Objects of Patent Rights 1. The objects of patent rights are the results of intellectual activity in the scientific and technical area that meet the requirements established by the present Code for inven- tions and utility models and the results of intellectual activity in the area of art design that meet the requirements established by the present Code for industrial designs. 2. Relates to secret inventions. 3. Stipulates that patent protection may not be granted to secret utility models and secret industrial designs. 4. The following may not be objects of patent rights: 1] Methods of cloning of a human being; 2] Methods of modification of the genetic integrity of cells of the embryonic line of a human being; 3] Use of human embryos for industrial and commercial purposes; 4] Other solutions contradicting social interests, principles of humanity and morality. part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

Civil Code Article 1350. Conditions of Patentability of an Invention 1. A technical solution in any area related to a product (including a structure, substance, microorganism strain, or culture of cells of plants or animals) or a means (a process of affecting a material object by material means) shall be protected as an invention. An invention shall be granted legal protection if it is new, has an inventive level, and is industrially applicable. 2. An invention is new if it is not known from the prior art. An invention has an inventive level if for a specialist it does not obviously follow from the prior art. The prior art includes any information that became publicly available in the world before the priority date of the invention. 3. Grace period – 6 month

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

4. An invention is industrially applicable if it may be used in industry, agriculture, health care, other branches of the economy, or the social sphere. 5. These objects are not inventions: 1] Discoveries; 2] Scientific theories and mathematical methods; 3] Solutions involving only the shape of articles and directed at the satisfaction of aesthetic needs; 4] Rules and methods for games and for intellectual or economic activity; 5] Computer programs; 6] Solutions consisting only of presentation of information. In accordance with the present paragraph a possibility of classifying these objects as inventions shall be excluded only in the case when the patent application involves these objects as such.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

6. Legal protection as inventions shall not be granted to: 1] Varieties of plants, breeds of animals and biological methods of obtaining them, with the exception of microbiological methods and products obtained through the use of such methods; 2] Topology of integrated circuits.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

Civil Code Article 1351. Conditions of Patentability of a Utility Mode 1. A technical solution relating to a device shall be protected as a utility model. A utility model shall be granted legal protection if it is new and industrially applicable. 2. A utility model is new if the totality of its essential features is not known from prior art. Prior art includes information on means for the same purpose as the utility model published in the world and information on their use in the Russian Federation if such information became publicly available before the priority date of the utility model. 3. Grace period – 6 month. 4. A utility model is industrially applicable if it may be used in industry, agriculture, health care, other branches of the economy, or the social sphere. 5. Legal protection as utility models shall not be granted to: 1] Solutions involving only the shape of articles and directed at the satisfaction of aesthetic needs; 2] Topology of integrated circuits. part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

Civil Code Article 1352. Conditions of Patentability of an Industrial Design 1. An art design solution of a articles of industrial or handicraft production defining its shape shall be protected as an industrial design. An industrial design shall be granted legal protection if it is new and original in its essential features. The essential features of an industrial design are the features determining the aesthetic and/or ergonomic peculiarity of the external view of the article, including form, configuration, ornamentation, and combination of colors. 2. An industrial design is new if the totality of its essential features reflected in images/pictures of the article and included in the list of essential features of the industrial design (Paragraph 2 of Article 1377) is not known from information that had become publicly available in the world before the priority date of the industrial design. 3. An industrial design is original if it’s essential features are determined by the creative nature of the peculiarity of the article. part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS IN RUSSIA | cont.

4. Grace period – 6 month 5. Legal protection as an industrial design shall not be granted to: 1] Solutions determined exclusively by the technical function of the article; 2] Objects of architecture (other than small architectural forms), industrial, hydro technical, and other stationary structures; 3] Objects of instable form from liquid, gas, flowing or similar substances.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com DURATION AND EXTENSION OF VALIDITY TERM |

DURATION AND EXTENSION OF VALIDITY TERM

Civil Code Article 1363. Time Periods of Validity of the Exclusive Rights to an Invention, Utility Model, and Industrial Design (extract) 1. The time period of validity of the exclusive right to an invention, utility model, or industrial design … shall be calculated from the filing date of the original application for the issuance of a patent to the RUPTO and …shall constitute: 20 years – for inventions; 10 + 3 years – for utility models; 15 + 10 years – for industrial designs. 2. If from the filing date of an application for the issuance of patent for an invention relating to drugs, pesticide, or agrochemical, for the use of which a permission is…

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com DURATION AND EXTENSION OF VALIDITY TERM | cont.

required, and until the day of receipt of the first permission for its application more than 5 years have elapsed, the time period of validity of the exclusive right to the corresponding invention and of the patent certifying this right shall be extended on request by the patent holder by the RUPTO. This time period shall be extended for the time that has passed from the filing date of the patent application to the day of receipt of the first permission for the use of the invention, minus 5 years. In such a case, the time period of validity of the patent for the invention may not be extended for more than 5 years. An application for extending the term shall be filed by the patent holder during the time period of validity of the patent and before the expiration of six months from the date of receipt of the permission for application of the invention or from the date of issuance of the patent, depending upon which of these time period expires later.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PRIOR USE RIGHT AND AFTER USE RIGHT |

PRIOR USE RIGHT AND AFTER USE RIGHT

Civil Code Article 1400. Reinstatement of Validity of a Patent for an Invention, Utility Model, or Industrial Design. Right of After Use (extract) 1. Validity of a patent for an invention, utility model or industrial design, which effectiveness was terminated due to the fact that the patent fee for maintaining the patent was not paid within the established time period may be reinstated by the RUPTO on petition of the patent owner. The petition for reinstatement may be filed with the RUPTO within three years from the day of expiration of the time period for payment of the patent fee but before the expiration of the time period of validity of a patent. A document confirming payment in the established amount of the patent fee for reinstatement of the effectiveness of the patent must be attached to the petition.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PRIOR USE RIGHT AND AFTER USE RIGHT | cont.

3. A person which in the period between the date of termination of the patent and the date of publication in the official gazette of the RUPTO of information on the reinstatement of the patent, began use of the invention, utility model or industrial design or made the preparations necessary for this within the indicated time period shall keep the right to its further uncompensated use without broadening the scope of its use (the right of after use).

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

CIVIL CODE OF RUSSIA

Article 1252. Protection of Exclusive Rights (extract) 1. Protection of exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity and to means of individualization shall be conducted in particular by the lodging of following claims: 1) On the recognition of the right; 2) On stopping of activities infringing the right or creating a threat of its infringement; 3) On compensation of damages; 4) On the taking off the physical carrier; 5) On publication of the decision of a court on the infringement committed with an indication of the actual right-holder.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

2. As a security for a claim in cases of the violation of the exclusive rights preliminary injunctions established by procedural legislation may be applied, among which seizure may be applied to material carriers, equipment, and materials.

3. In some cases it is possible to demand from the infringer a payment of compensation for the infringement of the right instead of compensation for damages. Compensation shall be subject to recovery upon proof of the fact of infringement of a right. In such case the right-holder applying for protection of a right, shall be freed from proof of the amount of damages caused to him. - not for inventions yet

The amount of compensation shall be determined by the court …. taking into account the requirements of reasonableness and justice.

Part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

4. In the case when the preparation, distribution, or other use, and also the import, transportation, or storage of physical carriers in which the result of intellectual activity or the means of individualization is expressed lead to infringement of the exclusive right to such a result or to such means, such physical carriers shall be considered counterfeit and on decision of a court shall be subject to removal from circulation and destruction without any compensation. 5. Equipment, other facilities and materials mainly used or meant for commission of infringements of exclusive rights, shall be subject to removal from circulation and destruction at the expense of the infringer, unless a statute provides for their being transferred to the income of the Russian Federation. 7. In cases when an infringement of an exclusive rights has been recognized as bad faith competition, protection of the infringed exclusive right may be exercised both by the means provided by the present Code and in accordance with antimonopoly legislation. part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

CRIMINAL CODE OF RUSSIA Three articles dedicated to IPR Article 146.1. Violation of Rights of Authors and Related Rights 1. Commitment of a usurpation of authorship (plagiarism) if this action caused major damage to the author or other copyright holder – shall be punished by a fine of up to 200 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of eigh- teen months, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to 480 hours, or correctional labor for up to one year, or arrest for up to six months. 2. Illegal use of copyright or related rights, as well as the acquisition, storage, trans- portation of counterfeit copies of works or phonograms for sale, committed on a large scale – shall be punished by a fine of up to 200 000 rubles or the salary or other Income of the convict for a period of 18 months, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to 480 hours, or correctional work for up to two years, or forced labor for a term not exceeding two years, or imprisonment for the same term. part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

3. Actions envisaged in the second part of this Article, if committed: a] A group of persons by prior conspiracy or by an organized group; b] On an extra large scale; c] A person using his official position, - punishable by compulsory work for a term not exceeding 5 years, or imprisonment for up to 6 years with a fine of up to 500 000 rubles or the salary or other income of convict for a period of up to 3 years or without it. Note. The actions provided for in this article shall be deemed committed in large scale if the cost of copies of works or phonograms or the value of the rights to the use of copyright and related rights exceeds 100 000 rubles, and on an extra large scale – 1 000 000 rubles. Article 147. Violation of Rights of Inventors and Patent Rights 1. Illegal use of an invention, utility model or industrial design, disclosure without the consent of the author or of the applicant essence of the invention, utility model or in- dustrial design before the official publication of information about them, commitment part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

of a usurpation of authorship or co-authorship coercion, if these acts have caused major damage – shall be punished by a fine of up to 200 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of eighteen months, or by compulsory works for a term of up to 480 hours, or forced labor for a term not exceeding two years, or deprivation of liberty for the same term. 2. The same actions committed by a group of persons by prior conspiracy, or by an organized group – shall be punished by a fine of 100 000 to 300 000 rubles or the salary or other in- come of the convict for a period of one to two years, or compulsory labor for a term not exceeding 5 years, or arrest for up to 6 months, or by deprivation of liberty for up to 5 years. Article 180. Illegal Use of Trademark 1.Illegal use of a trademark, service mark, appellation of origin or similar designations for similar goods, if the offense is committed repeatedly or caused major damage – part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

shall be punished by a fine of up to 200 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of 18 months, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to 480 hours, or correctional labor for up to two years. 2. Illegal use of the label warning against not registered in the Russian Federation, trademark or appellation of origin if the act committed repeatedly or caused major damage – shall be punished by a fine of up to 120 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of up to one year, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to 360 hours, or correctional labor for up to one year. 3. Actions stipulated by the first or second paragraph of this article, done by a group of persons by prior conspiracy or by an organized group, − shall be punished by a fine of 500 000 to 1 000 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of 3 to 5 years, or forced labor for a term not exceeding five years, or deprivation of liberty for up to 6 years with a fine of up to 500 000 rubles or the salary or other income of the convict for a period of up to 3 years or without it.

Part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

RUSSIAN CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES Three articles dedicated to IPR Article 7.12. Violation of Rights of Authors and Related Rights, Rights of Inventors and Patent Rights 1. Importation, sale, lease, or otherwise unlawful use of copies of works or phono- grams for the purpose of deriving income in cases where copies of works or phono- grams are counterfeit, according to the legislation of the Russian Federation on Copy- right and Related Rights or on copies of works or phonograms contains false informa- tion their manufacturers, the location of their production, as well as the holders of co- pyright and related rights, as well as a violation of copyright and related rights in order to generate income, except as provided for by Part 2 of Article 14.33 of this Code – shall entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of 1 500 to 2 000 rubles with confiscation of infringing copies of works or phonograms, as well as materials and equipment used for their playback, and other instruments of part 1 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

committing the administrative offense; for officials – from 10 000 to 20 000 with confiscation of infringing copies of works or phonograms, as well as materials and equipment used for their 30 000 to 40 000 rubles with confiscation of infringing copies of works or phonograms, and materials and equipment used for their playback, and the other instruments of committing the administrative offense. 2. Illegal use of an invention, utility model or industrial design, except as specified in paragraph two of Article 14.33 of the Code, the disclosure without the consent of the author or of the applicant an essence of the invention, utility model or industrial design before the official publication of information about them, commitment of a usurpation of authorship or co-authorship coercion – shall entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of 1 500 to 2 000 rubles; for officials – from 10 000 to 20 000 rubles; for legal entities – from 30 000 to 40 000 rubles.

part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

Article 14.10. Illegal Use of Trademark 1. Illegal use of a trademark, service mark, appellation of origin or similar designations for similar goods – shall entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of one 1 500 to 2 000 rubles with confiscation of items containing illegal reproduction of a trademark, service mark, appellation of origin; on officials – from 10 000 to 20 000 rubles with confiscation of items containing illegal reproduction of a trademark, service mark, appellation of origin; for legal entities – from 30 000 to 40 000 rubles with confiscation of items containing illegal reproduction of a trademark, service mark, appellation of origin. Article 14.33. Unfair Competition 1. Unfair competition, if these actions do not contain a criminal offense, except in cases provided for in Article 14.3 of this Code and Part 2 of this article – punishable by an administrative fine on officials in the amount of 12 0000 to 20 000 rubles; for legal entities from 100 000 to 500 000 rubles. part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT of Intellectual Property Rights | cont.

2. Unfair competition, expressed in the commercialization of goods with illegal use of intellectual property and similar means of individualization of a legal person, means of individualization of products, works and services – punishable by an administrative fine on officials in the amount of 20 000 rubles or disqualification for a period of up to 3 years; and on legal entities – from 1/100 to 15/100 of the income of the violator from selling goods (works, services) on the market where the violation, but not less than 100 000 rubles.

part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com RUSSIAN FEDERATION COURT STRUCTURE |

RUSSIAN FEDERATION COURT STRUCTURE

RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Russian Supreme Court Russian Supreme Commercial Court

Regional Appellation and Cassation Courts

Regional Appellation and Cassation Commercial Courts

Regional Federal Courts Regional Commercial Courts

Specialized Court: Court for Intellectual Rights (Moscow) – from 2013

Part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com RUSSIAN COURT FOR INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS

FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL ACT ―On Commercial Courts in the Russian Federation‖ (extract) Article 43.2. Court for intellectual rights Court for intellectual rights is a specialized commercial court considering within its jurisdiction as a court of first instance and appeal courts cases of disputes relating to the protection of intellectual rights. Article 43.4. The powers of the Court for intellectual rights 1. Court for intellectual rights as a court of first instance, consider: 1] cases challenging the normative legal acts of federal executive authorities, con- cerning the rights and legitimate interests of the applicant in the legal protection of intellectual activity results and means of individualization, including in the field of patent rights and rights for selection attainment, the right to integrated circuits, the rights on trade secrets (know-how), the right to the means of individualization of legal persons, goods, services and businesses; part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com RUSSIAN COURT FOR INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS | cont.

2] cases of disputes regarding the granting or termination of legal protection of the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization of legal persons, goods, services and businesses (with the exception of copyright and related rights, topog- raphies of integrated circuits), including: • challenging the non-legislative acts, decisions and actions (or inaction) of the federal executive authority on intellectual property …; • of challenging the decision of the federal antimonopoly authority on the recognition of unfair competition actions related to the acquisition of the exclusive rights of the means of individualization of legal persons, goods, works, services and businesses; • of establishing of the patent ownership; • of invalidating a patent for an invention, utility model, industrial design or selection attainment, and invalidating decision to grant legal protection to a trademark appellation of origin and to grant exclusive rights to a name, if federal law does not provide for a different procedure for the invalidation; • early termination of the legal protection of a trademark due to its non-use. part 2| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES

Part 3| GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES |

RU 2178649 1. Phyto tea, comprising • 40-70% of hibiscus petals, • 20-35% of cassia, and • flavoring (…).

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

“ALL FEATURES OF AN INDEPENDENT CLAIM”

. several independent claims . independent claim has dependent claims . alternative features in the independent claim

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

F. HOFFMAN vs. GENFA & BIOTECH CAPECITABINUM RU 2135511 Claim 1 Real compound

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES |

RU 2178649 1. Phyto tea, comprising • 40-70% of hibiscus petals, • 20-35% of cassia, and • flavoring (….)

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES |

RU 2178649

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

BIOTECH vs. SERUM INSTITUTE

RU 2238105

А40-66073/2009 (estoppel)

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

BAYER vs. GEDEON DROSPIRENON

Infringement: RU 2269342 RU 2449796 А40-90149/2011

Partial invalidation (infringement complain is rejected) part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

F. HOFFMAN vs. GENFA & BIOTECH CAPECITABINUM

Infringement: RU 2135511 RU 2458932 А40-86264/2011 A40-87361/2011 Partial invalidation Patent term extension

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | cont.

IMPORTANT DECISIONS

. Imatinib (Novartis vs. Pharm-Synthes): obtaining marketing authorization is not considered as patent infringement (А40-65668/2008) . Use-patent supplementary protection is possible (ВАС-3927/2012)

part 3 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE OPTION TO OBTAIN PATENT PROTECTION IN RUSSIA AND SEVEN OTHER COUNTRIES

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT EAPC |

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT EAPC

. The Eurasian Patent Convention was signed on September 9, 1994 in Moscow by the Heads of Governments of several post-soviet countries. . To date, 8 countries are represented in the EAPO and Administrative Council: . Republic of Armenia, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Russian Federation, Republic of Tajikistan, Republic of Turkmenistan. . The Governments of the Contracting States appointed their plenipotentiary representatives to work in the Administrative Council. They are also heads of the national patent offices. . Each Contacting States delegates also EAPO employees. part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT EAPC | cont.

. The Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) established the Eurasian Patent Organization with the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) acting as its executive body. . All Contracting States are members of the Organization. . The Eurasian Patent Organization has two bodies, the Eurasian Patent Office and the Administrative Council. . The Eurasian Office is headed by the President who is the highest official in the Organization and is its representative. . EAPO is an intergovernmental organization and has the status of a legal entity. Location of the headquarters of the Organization is Moscow, the Russian Federation . . The only official language of the Organization is Russian. part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com CIS COUNTRIES |

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com DYNAMICS OF EURASIAN FILINGS DURING THE LAST 5 YEARS |

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com BREAKDOWN OF EURASIAN APPLICATIONS BY APPLICANTS’ COUNTRIES OF RESIDENCE IN 2012 |

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com BREAKDOWN OF EURASIAN APPLICATIONS BY FILING PROCEDURE|

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT GRANTS IN 2012 |

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com INFORMATION ON EURASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS |

INFORMATION ON EURASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS

State Number of Attorneys Republic of Azerbaijan 5 Republic of Armenia 3 Republic of Belarus 25 Republic of Kazakhstan 5 Kyrgyz Republic 7 Russian Federation 212 Republic of Tajikistan 2 Turkmenistan 3 TOTAL 262

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com MOST IMPORTANT EAPO DOCUMENTS|

MOST IMPORTANT EAPO DOCUMENTS . Eurasian Patent Convention . Patent Regulations under the Eurasian Patent Convention . Administrative Regulation under the Eurasian Patent Convention . Statute on Fees of the Eurasian Patent Organization . Rules for drafting, filing and examining Eurasian applications in the EAPO . Rules for filing and examining opposition against the grant of a Eurasian Patent on the basis of Administrative Revocation of a Eurasian Patent . Procedures on Assignment of Rights Conferred by a Eurasian Application or a Eurasian Patent . Procedures on Appeals against the Eurasian Patent Office’s Decision to Refuse the Grant of a Eurasian Patent part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com MOST IMPORTANT EAPO DOCUMENTS | cont.

. Procedures on Extending the Term of a Eurasian Patent . Procedures for Filing Eurasian Applications, Containing Nucleotide and/or Amino Acid Sequences . Memo for patent holders and their representatives on restoration of a right to a Eurasian patent

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT CONVENTION |

EURASIAN PATENT CONVENTION Part III. Substantive Patent Law

Article 6. Patentable Inventions • The Eurasian Office shall grant a Eurasian patent for any invention that is new, involves an inventive step and is industrially applicable. Article 7. Persons Entitled to a Eurasian Patent 1. The right to a Eurasian patent shall belong to the inventor or his successor in title. Where the inventor is an employee, the right to a Eurasian patent shall be determined in accordance with the law of the State in which the employee is mainly employed; if the State in which the employee is mainly employed cannot be determined, the law to be applied shall be that of the State in which the employer has a place of business to which the employee is attached.

part 2 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT CONVENTION | cont.

2. For the purposes of proceedings before the Eurasian Office, the applicant shall be deemed to be entitled to the Eurasian patent.

Article 9. Patent Rights 1. The owner of a Eurasian patent shall have the exclusive right to use, and also to authorize the use or prohibit others from using, the patented invention.

2. The owner of a Eurasian patent may assign or license his rights.

3. After an application for the grant of a Eurasian patent (hereinafter referred to as ―the Eurasian application‖) has been published, the applicant shall enjoy provisional protection in conformity with the national legislation of the Contracting States.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT CONVENTION | cont.

Article 10. Extent of Legal Protection The extent of the legal protection conferred by a Eurasian patent shall be determined by the claims. The description and drawings shall serve only to interpret the claims. Article 11. Term of Eurasian Patent The term of a Eurasian patent shall be 20 years from the filing date of the Eurasian application. Article 13. Validity of Eurasian Patent and Enforcement of Rights 1. Any dispute arising from the validity, in a given Contracting State, or the infringement, in a given Contracting State, of a Eurasian patent shall be resolved by the national courts or other competent authorities of that State on the basis of this Convention and the Patent Regulations. The decision shall have effect only in the territory of the Contracting State.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com EURASIAN PATENT CONVENTION | cont.

2. Each Contracting State shall, in the case of infringement of a Eurasian patent, provide for the same civil or other liability as in the case of a national patent.

3. Any national court or other competent authority of a Contracting State may require that the plaintiff furnish to it a translation of the Eurasian patent in the state language of the Contracting State.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIST OF EAPO OFFICIAL FEES (abstract) |

LIST OF EAPO OFFICIAL FEES (abstract)

EUR • Filing application or Entry into Regional Phase of PCT-Application* 640,- +80,- for each claim over five • Additional fee for filing application between 12-14 month from priority date 400,- • Filing a request for substantive examination - for one invention 640,- - for group of inventions 640,- + 475,- for the 2nd + + 240 for the 3rd, 4th and 5th inventions • Late filing examination request (within 2 month) + 50% • Filing amendments 160,- • Extension of term (per month) From 25, - till 150, - and more,-

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com LIST OF EAPO OFFICIAL FEES (abstract) | cont.

• Granting a patent 400,- • Filing opposition against rejection decision 440,- • Filing opposition against granting 640,- • Assignment of a patent 320,-

* For PCT-applications with International Search or Preliminary Examination Report reduction of Official filing fee is 25 %.

• Annual fee for keeping a Eurasian patent valid is equal to a sum of fees for keeping a Eurasian patent valid in Contracting States according to the year of effect of a Eurasian patent. Amount of the fee for keeping a Eurasian patent valid regarding each of Contracting States is established by corresponding State.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PATENT TERM EXTENSION |

PATENT TERM EXTENSION

The term of a Eurasian patent may be extended in relation to such a EAPC country, the legislation of which provides for the extension of national patents. In such cases, the Eurasian patent shall be extended by the Eurasian Office in relation to this state, on conditions stipulated in the national legislation of this state for extending national patents. Conditions: - the term of a Eurasian patent shall be extended in a specific member-state of the Convention in respect of such subject matter of inventions, for which extension of a national patent’s term is allowed in this member state of the Convention; - the extension period, which is being sought for and granted to a Eurasian patent in a specific member state of the Convention, shall not exceed the period by which the term of a national patent may be extended in this state; part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com PATENT TERM EXTENSION | cont.

- the grounds for extending the term of a Eurasian patent in respect of a certain member state of the Convention shall comply with the grounds (conditions) for extending the term of a national patent for invention in this state; - the documents, providing evidence of the grounds for extending the term of a Eurasian patent in respect of a certain member state of the Convention, shall match up with the documents, which are to be filed with the national patent office of this state to provide evidence of such grounds (conditions); - the time limit for lodging a request with the Eurasian Office to extend the term of a Eurasian patent in respect of a certain member state of the Convention shall correspond to the time limit for filing a request to extend the term of a national patent in this state, if a time limit for such a request is prescribed under the laws of this state.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com USEFUL ADVANTAGES |

USEFUL ADVANTAGES

GRACE PERIOD: Rule 3(2) of the EA Patent Regulation: Disclosure of information relating to the invention that otherwise would affect its patentability shall not do so where the information relating to the subject matter of the invention has been made available to the public not earlier than during the six months preceding the filing date of, or the priority date claimed for, the Eurasian application, by the inventor or applicant or by any person having obtained the information directly or indirectly from them. The burden of proof of the circumstances of disclosure shall be on the applicant.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com USEFUL ADVANTAGES | cont.

Rule 17 of the EA Patent Regulation: Infringement of the Eurasian Patent The following acts shall constitute an infringement, within the meaning of Article 13 (1) of the Convention, of said patent owner's exclusive right: • the making, use, importing, offering for sale, sale or any other form of marketing or storage for that purpose, of a product protected by a Eurasian patent; • the use of a process protected by a Eurasian patent or the offering thereof for such use; • the use, importing, offering for sale, sale or any other form of marketing or storage for that purpose, of a product directly obtained by a process protected by a Eurasian patent.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com USEFUL ADVANTAGES | cont.

Rule 53 of the EA Patent Regulation: Administrative Revocation of a Eurasian Patent 1. The administrative revocation of the Eurasian patent provided for in Article 19(xiii) of the Convention shall be pronounced on the basis of a notice of opposition filed with the Eurasian Office by any person within six months from the date of publication of information concerning the grant of the Eurasian patent. 2. A Eurasian patent may be administratively revoked either entirely or in part, even where it has lapsed or has been surrendered, in the following cases: • the grant of the Eurasian patent had no legal basis owing to the invention not meeting the patentability criteria; • the claims include features that did not appear in the Eurasian application as originally filed.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com USEFUL ADVANTAGES | cont.

3. The Eurasian Office shall consider any notice of opposition to the grant of a Eurasian patent within six months of the date of its receipt.

4. The Eurasian patent recognized as invalid as the result of an administrative revocation procedure, either entirely or in part, shall be considered void in all Contracting States as from the date of filing of the Eurasian application.

5. The notice of opposition to the grant of a Eurasian patent shall be filed in writing and shall contain an appropriate statement of the reasons. The notice of opposition to the grant of a Eurasian patent shall be accepted only on payment of the prescribed fee.

part 4 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS

Part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS |

COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN FEES Filing fees Examination fees 5000 5000 4000 RU 4000 EA 3000

3000 EURO 2000

EURO 2000 EA 1000 1000 RU 0 0 1 11 21 31 41 51 1 11 21 31 41 independent claims claims Total fees 25000 . Total fee for 50 claims 20000 15000 (all independent): RU EURO 10000 EA In Russia EURO 4100 5000 0 in Eurasia EURO 6060 25 50 100 150 200 250 part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS | cont.

VALENTA vs. VEROPHARM DIMERCAPROL RU 2229291 RU 2423117

ЕА 10649 ЕА 10649 А40-5951/2005 (infringement) А40-24190/2009 (invalidation RU 2229291) А40-127228/2009 (invalidation ЕА 10649)

(industrial applicability criterion during invalidation)

part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS | cont.

Merck vs. KRKA Fosamax

EA 4544 А40-38663/2007 (invalidation) Inventive step with an Expert opinion)

part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS | cont.

LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER vs. CANONPHARMA PRODUCTION TRIMETAZIDINE

Deprenorm Preductal

EA 8223 EA 9810 А40-40290/2010 (invalidation) А40-139258/2009 (invalidation) А41-19266/2008 (infringement, both) (Defendant has their own patent) part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com COMPARING RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN PATENT SYSTEMS | cont.

LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER vs. CANONPHARMA PRODUCTION TRIMETAZIDINE January 2007 EA 8223 Servier patent granted August 2007 EA 9810 CanonPharma filing application January 2008 EA 9810 CanonPharma patent granted September 2008 Les Laboratoires Servier vs. CanonPharma (infringement EA 8223) May 2009 Decision of Commercial court February 2010 Decision of Appeal Commercial court

part 5 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES - Continuation

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES |

Several Important Legal Rulings of the Supreme Commercial Court

Legal ruling № 8091/09 of Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 01.12.2009 Plaintiff: ОАО «Kazan Oil Factory» - owner of patent RU 2 284 127 «Mayonnaise»

Defendant ZАО «Essen Production AG» - owner of patent RU 2 325 821 «Mayonnaise with quail egg»

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | |cont.

RU 2 284 127 RU 2325 821 Claim 1 Claim 1 Mayonnaise, containing vegetable refined Mayonnaise comprising a fat component, egg component, table deodorized oil, sugar, table salt, 80% acetic salt, food acid component sweetening component and water, acid, food additives and water, characterized in characterized in that the fat component is a vegetable oil refined that it additionally contains milk powder and fresh and deodorized, the egg component is egg yolk powder, the food quail eggs, with the following component ratio, acid component is lemon juice, citric acid and lactic acid, the wt.%: sweetening components is a sweetener, while mayonnaise further Vegetable oil 20,0-70,0 comprises potassium sorbate, ginger extract and marinated quail Sugar 0.01-5.0 egg, with the following component ratio, wt.%: Fresh quail egg 0.1-10.0 Vegetable oil 40-70 Acetic acid 80% 0.2-1.0 Egg yolk powder 1.0-1.4 Table salt 0.01-2.0 Marinated quail egg 0.3 Milk powder 0.01-5.0 Sweetener 0.01-2.0 Food additives 0,50-2,0 Salt 1.0 Water Balance Potassium sorbate 0.1 Lemon juice 0.1 Citric Acid 0.2 Lactic acid 0.2 Ginger extract 0.02-0.05 Water Balance part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

. Plaintiff’s claims: to prohibit the defendant to commit actions that infringe the exclusive rights of the plaintiff, to destroy stocks of finished products, to withdraw the product from sale; to publish the court decision in the Official Journal of RU PTO and the newspaper "Kommersant". . Court of 1st Instance: (Commercial Court of the Republic of Tatarstan): the use of the plaintiff's invention RU 2284127 has been ascertained by judicial patent and technical examination. The judgment of 17.12.2008: Partially satisfy the claim. Refuse from publication in the newspaper "Kommersant". . Court of 2nd instance: (11th Commercial Appeal Court) 19.03.2009: Judgment of the 1st instance to cancel completely; to deny the plaintiff’s claim. . Court of 3rd instance: (cassation to the Federal Commercial Court of the Volga region) 13.05.2009: decision of the Court of Appeal to cancel completely, the judgment of the first instance shall be upheld.

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

. The Supreme Commercial Court - Legal Ruling number 8091/09 of the Court Presidium of 01.12.2009: the decision of the first and third instances to cancel; the judgment of the first instance shall be upheld. . Justification: Indeed, the court found that the defendant manufactures and sells the product "Mayonnaise with quail egg," in which the invention is used by the plaintiff's patent RU 2284127. Forensic examination in its analysis used the doctrine of equivalents, and some features of the defendant manufactured product found to be equivalent to features of independent claim 1 of RU 2284127. However, the defendant uses at the same product and another invention protected by the owned by him patent RU 2325821. The defendant insisted on the presence of his invention, which differs from the invention of the plaintiff, that is, of an "independent" patent, and it was the use of his own patent, at that the plaintiff did not challenge the patentability of the defendant’ invention. part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

. Conclusion: if there are two patents on the inventions with the same or equivalent features given in the independent claims, the defendant's actions cannot be regarded as an infringement of the patent with an earlier priority date.

• Reference – to the Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13.12.2007 № 122, according to which "if there are two patents on inventions with the same or equivalent features given in the independent claims, the defendant's actions cannot be regarded as an infringement of the patent with an earlier priority date unless the patent with later priority date is not recognized invalid in accordance with the established procedure. .

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

Legal Ruling № 15339/11 of Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 10.04.2012 PLAINTIFF: "State Technical University of the City of Orel", holder of patents RU 2281365 "Building from Panel Elements "and RU 2275477" Grid-Like Wall Siding Member" DEFENDANT: OAO "Orelprojekt", location – City of Orel

. Plaintiff’s claims: to stop use of technical solutions that are protected by patents RU 2281365 and RU 2275477 and recover damages in the amount of 200 000 rubles. . Court of 1st Instance: (Commercial Court of the Orel Region): the use of the plaintiff's inventions in the project of buildings has been ascertained by judicial patent and technical examination. The judgment of 13.01.2011: Partially satisfy the claim. Refuse from recovery of damages. part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

. Court of 2nd instance (19th Commercial Appeal Court), 25.05.2011: Judgment of the 1st instance remains unchanged. . Court of 3rd instance (cassation to the Federal Commercial Court of the Central Circuit) 30.08.2011: decision of the 1st instance Court and the Court of Appeal to cancel in part regarding recovery 200 000 rubles, the plaintiff’s claims in this regard to satisfy. . The Supreme Commercial Court - Legal Ruling number 15339/11 of the Court Presidium of 10.04.2012: the decisions of all instances to cancel; the case to be sent to the court of first instance for a new trial . Justification: Court of 1st Instance did not put the question before the experts about the features of the invention contained in the independent claims of the invention, about presence in the project documentation of each of such feature or their…

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

… their equivalents. The buildings, which were examined by the experts, were not built by the defendant. Experts' answers did not meet the requirements of Art. 10 of the Patent Law of the Russian Federation, as in the expert opinion there is no conclusion that the project documentation created by the defendant, contain every feature of independent claim of the plaintiff’s patent, or their equivalent. P.S. After returning the case to the new trial the court had appointed a new forensic examination. The conclusion of this new examination - not each of features of the invention is used in the project documentation. The court's decision - the claim is denied.

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

Legal Ruling N 46-B11-8 of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of May 17, 2011 . Plaintiffs: the inventors of the patent RU 2177009 dated 06.07.1999, for the "Method for producing of butyl rubber‖ . Defendant: OOO "Togliattikauchuk", located in Togliatti, the owner of the patent RU 2177009 "Method for producing of butyl rubber" . Plaintiff’s claims: to pay reward to the authors of the employment invention, the use of which by the defendant started on 06.01.1999 and continued until the date of filing of the claim, and to pay penalties for late payment of the reward. . Court of 1st Instance: (Federal Court of the Central District of the City of Togliatti): judgment of 13.01.2011: completely satisfy the claim. . Court of 2nd Instance: (Federal Court of Samara Region): Judgment of the 1st instance remains unchanged. part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

. Legal Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation N 46-B11-8 on May 17, 2011: the decisions of all instances to cancel; the case to be sent to the court of first instance for a new trial. . Justification: Court of 1st Instance did not consider the defendant's argument that the invention has not been used in production. The court, however, having rejected the defendant’ request for examination by a patent specialist, considered as ascertained the use by the defendant of claims of the invention "A method for producing butyl rubber," on the grounds that three distinctive feature of the invention contained in the claims, namely the composition of the catalyst, the ratio of protonated complexes and the sum of the protonated complexes in the catalyst are listed in the regulation of production, which confirms the use of the invention by the defendant in the manufacture of butyl rubber. . In addition, one of the inventors (Mr. Shcherban) is not an employee of the defendant and therefore had no right to be rewarded for the creation of an employment invention. part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

In addition, the court did not consider the defendant's statement that from March 31, 2009 the patent validity was terminated by the patent owner (the defendant) by filing with RUPTO an appropriate request.

According to Article 1364 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation upon the expiry of the exclusive right to an invention, utility model or industrial design it appears a public domain.

The invention, utility model or industrial design being a part of public domain may be freely used by any person without someone's consent or permission and without paying reward for use. Early termination of a patent validity means that a legal regime has been changed, from a monopoly regime in which the technical or art design solution were protected to the regime of the public domain prior to the end of the statutory period of validity of the patent.

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com OVERVIEW OF THE IMPORTANT RUSSIAN COURT CASES | | cont.

Court cases involving RUPTO and considered by the courts in Moscow

Challenge of decisions (actions) of RU PTO Challenge of contracts, authorship and patent The total ownership, exclusive rights violation number of legal acts, IP Commercial courts Federal courts Commercial courts Federal courts Objects which completed its Not Not Not Not consideration Satisfied satisfied Satisfied satisfied Satisfied satisfied Satisfied satisfied of the merits

TM 38 504 — — 2 19 1 — 564

Industrial 3 8 — 9 — 1 — — 21 Design

Inventions 1 59 2 14 — 7 — — 83

Utility — 24 2 4 — — — — 30 Models

part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com Thank you for your attention

ARS-PATENT IP Law Firm www.ars-patent.com

Visitors: Pevchesky per. 12A, LightHouse, 4th Floor, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia Mail: POB 128, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia T +7 812 6006707, F +7 812 3259815

© ARS-PATENT 2013 “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars- patent.com Mr. Vladimir Rybakov, is the Senior Partner of ARS-Patent, and has been the firm's Director since 1994. As the Director of ARS-Patent, Mr. Rybakov concentrates his practice on counseling, litigating, and licensing matters for domestic and foreign clientele.

Education: Mr. Rybakov graduated from the St. Petersburg Baltic State Technical University in 1974, with a M.Sc. in mechanical engineering and a specialization in aircrafts and flying apparatuses. In 1986, Mr. Rybakov graduated with a distinction from the Russian Intellectual Property and Innovations Institute, earning a patent agent certificate. In 1993, he was certified as a Patent Attorney, with a specialization in "Trademarks, Inventions, Utility Models, and the Protection of the Designation of Vladimir Rybakov Origin". Senior Partner Practice: Russian Patent Attorney, Reg. # 90 Eurasian Patent Attorney, Reg. # 132 Mr. Rybakov is registered to practice before the Russian and Eurasian Patent Office: St. Petersburg Offices and has experience in litigating before the Russian and Eurasian Patent E-mail: [email protected] Office. He has a broad experience in the field of mechanics, physics, electronics, transportation, and metallurgy. His patent practice focuses on filing and processing domestic and international patent and utility model applications, licensing, as well as invalidation proceedings. Mr. Rybakov participated in

developing strategies for the litigation and the protection of intellectual property for major ARS-Patent clients. Foreign languages: · English · German part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com Mrs. Ilyana Lipatova joined ARS-Patent in 2003 and is a leading patent attorney in the field of biotech and pharmaceutical industry.

Education: Mrs. Lipatova graduated with honors from the St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University from the Physical-Mechanical Department (Biophysical sub- department), with a specialization in genetic engineering. Mrs. Lipatova audited "Civil Law" at the St. Petersburg State University's School of Law. While studying at the St. Petersburg Polytechnical University, she interned at the Russian Intellectual Property and Innovations Institute in the "Patenting of Biotechnological Inventions" program. In 1998, she was certified as a Patent Attorney, with a specialization in "Inventions and Utility Models". Ilyana Lipatova Practice: Russian Patent Attorney, Reg. # 554 Mrs. Lipatova has been working in the sphere of intellectual property since 1993. Eurasian Patent Attorney, Reg. # 150 Her practice focuses on representing the interests of pharmaceutical and biotech companies before the Russian and Eurasian patent offices, including counseling Office: St. Petersburg and litigating on objections filed against patents in the field of drugs, E-mail: [email protected] biotechnology, genetics, pharmaceuticals, organic chemistry, and medicine. Areas of work: Mrs. Lipatova is an author of several publications on the subject of legal protection · Inventions of intellectual property. · Utility models Foreign languages: · English part 6 | GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE IP PROTECTION IN RUSSIA “ARS UNA − SPECIES MILLE” | www.ars-patent.com