DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Draft 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. St N., Suite 202 St. Petersburg FL 33702 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Pre-Assessment of the Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) Fishery in the Campeche Bank, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, using Bottom and Vertical Longlines Prepared for: Cooperativa de Producción de Bienes y Servicios Pescadores de Nuevo Campechito SC de RL de CV and Comunidad y Biodiversidad, AC Prepared by: Drs. Mónica Valle-Esquivel, Sara Adlerstein-González, and José Francisco Chávez-Villegas MRAG Americas, Inc. May 22, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL Conformity Assessment Body MRAG Americas Inc. (CAB) Cooperativa de Produccion de Bienes y Servicios Pescadores de Fishery client Nuevo Campechito SC de RL de CV and Comunidad y Biodiversidad, AC Assessment Type Comprehensive pre-assessment Project code US 2624 Version 3.0 Mónica Valle-Esquivel, Sara Adlerstein-González, and Prepared by José Francisco Chávez-Villegas Approved by Amanda Stern-Pirlot MRAG Americas Pre-Assessment of the Red Snapper Fishery in the Campeche Bank, Mexico ii CONFIDENTIAL Table Index ................................................................................................................................. v Figure Index .............................................................................................................................. vii Glossary ................................................................................................................................... viii 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Aims and constraints of the pre-assessment .................................................. 4 2.2 Version details ................................................................................................. 5 3 Unit(s) of Assessment .................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment ..................................................................................... 6 4 Traceability ..................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Traceability within the fishery ........................................................................ 7 5 Pre-assessment results ................................................................................................ 10 5.1 Pre-assessment results overview .................................................................. 10 5.1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 10 5.1.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................. 13 5.2 Summary of potential conditions by Principle .............................................. 13 5.3 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores .......................................... 14 5.4 Principle 1 ...................................................................................................... 20 5.4.1 Principle 1 background ...................................................................................... 20 5.4.2 Catch profiles ..................................................................................................... 30 5.4.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data ...................................................... 31 5.4.4 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .................................. 32 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status .................................................................................................. 32 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding ........................................................................................... 35 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ........................................................................................... 37 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ................................................................... 41 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ........................................................................ 43 PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status .......................................................................... 46 5.5 Principle 2 ...................................................................................................... 49 5.5.1 Principle 2 background ...................................................................................... 49 5.5.2 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .................................. 67 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome............................................................................. 67 MRAG Americas Pre-Assessment of the Red Snapper Fishery in the Campeche Bank, Mexico iii CONFIDENTIAL PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ....................................................... 69 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information ........................................................................ 72 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome ........................................................................ 74 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy ................................................... 77 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information ................................................................... 80 PI 2.3.1 – ETP species outcome ................................................................................... 82 PI 2.3.2 – ETP species management strategy .............................................................. 84 PI 2.3.3 – ETP species information .............................................................................. 87 PI 2.4.1 – Habitats outcome ........................................................................................ 89 PI 2.4.2 – Habitats management strategy ................................................................... 91 PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information.................................................................................... 93 PI 2.5.1 – Ecosystem outcome ..................................................................................... 95 PI 2.5.2 – Ecosystem management strategy ............................................................... 96 PI 2.5.3 – Ecosystem information ................................................................................ 98 5.6 Principle 3 .................................................................................................... 100 5.6.1 Principle 3 background .................................................................................... 100 5.6.2 Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................ 105 PI 3.1.1 – Legal and/or customary framework .......................................................... 105 PI 3.1.2 – Consultation, roles and responsibilities .................................................... 107 PI 3.1.3 – Long term objectives ................................................................................. 109 PI 3.2.1 – Fishery-specific objectives ......................................................................... 111 PI 3.2.2 – Decision-making processes ........................................................................ 113 PI 3.2.3 – Compliance and enforcement ................................................................... 117 PI 3.2.4 – Monitoring and management performance evaluation ........................... 120 6 List of References ....................................................................................................... 122 7 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 127 7.1 Assessment information ............................................................................. 127 7.1.1 Small-scale fisheries ......................................................................................... 127 7.2 Evaluation processes and techniques ......................................................... 127 7.2.1 Site visits .......................................................................................................... 127 7.2.2 Recommendations for stakeholder participation in full assessment .............. 127 7.3 Risk-Based Framework outputs .................................................................. 132 7.3.1 Consequence Analysis (CA) .............................................................................. 132 7.3.2 Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) ........................................................ 133 MRAG Americas Pre-Assessment of the Red Snapper Fishery in the Campeche Bank, Mexico iv CONFIDENTIAL Table Index Table 1. Relationship between catch (t), total value (MXN Pesos) and price per kg for the red snapper resource in the Gulf of Mexico. Data obtained from the CONAPESCA portal (2018). ............ 8 Table 2. Commercialization of red snapper from the Gulf of Mexico (PROFECO 2011). ...................... 8 Table 3. Traceability within the fishery. ................................................................................................ 8 Table 4. Key to likely scoring level in Table 5 and P1, P2, and P3 performance indicators. ............... 10 Table 5. Summary of Performance Indicator level scores
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3
    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2018) 48 (4): 341–362 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02451 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST AND CHARACTERISATION OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA (ELASMOBRANCHII AND ACTINOPTERYGII) OF THE LAGUNA DE TAMIAHUA, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3 1 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, SAGARPA, Ciudad de México 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México Raz-Guzmán A., Huidobro L., Padilla V. 2018. An updated checklist and characterisation of the ichthyofauna (Elasmobranchii and Actinopterygii) of the Laguna de Tamiahua, Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 48 (4): 341–362. Background. Laguna de Tamiahua is ecologically and economically important as a nursery area that favours the recruitment of species that sustain traditional fisheries. It has been studied previously, though not throughout its whole area, and considering the variety of habitats that sustain these fisheries, as well as an increase in population growth that impacts the system. The objectives of this study were to present an updated list of fish species, data on special status, new records, commercial importance, dominance, density, ecotic position, and the spatial and temporal distribution of species in the lagoon, together with a comparison of Tamiahua with 14 other Gulf of Mexico lagoons. Materials and methods. Fish were collected in August and December 1996 with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl from different habitats throughout the lagoon. The species were identified, classified in relation to special status, new records, commercial importance, density, dominance, ecotic position, and spatial distribution patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015
    Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Patrícia Amorim | Fishery Analyst, Systems Division | [email protected] Megan Westmeyer | Fishery Analyst, Strategy Communications and Analyze Division | [email protected] CITATION Amorim, P. and M. Westmeyer. 2016. Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation. 18 pp. Available from www.fishsource.com. PHOTO CREDITS left: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) right: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) © Sustainable Fisheries Partnership February 2016 KEYWORDS Developing countries, FAO, fisheries, grouper, improvements, seafood sector, small-scale fisheries, snapper, sustainability www.sustainablefish.org i Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The goal of this report is to provide a brief overview of the current status and trends of the snapper and grouper seafood sector, as well as to identify the main gaps of knowledge and highlight areas where improvements are critical to ensure long-term sustainability. Snapper and grouper are important fishery resources with great commercial value for exporters to major international markets. The fisheries also support the livelihoods and food security of many local, small-scale fishing communities worldwide. It is therefore all the more critical that management of these fisheries improves, thus ensuring this important resource will remain available to provide both food and income. Landings of snapper and grouper have been steadily increasing: in the 1950s, total landings were about 50,000 tonnes, but they had grown to more than 612,000 tonnes by 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Demersal Fishes Captured by the Pair Trawl Fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil
    Biota Neotropica 19(1): e20170432, 2019 www.scielo.br/bn ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) Inventory Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil Matheus Marcos Rotundo1,2,3,4 , Evandro Severino-Rodrigues2, Walter Barrella4,5, Miguel Petrere Jun- ior3 & Milena Ramires4,5 1Universidade Santa Cecilia, Acervo Zoológico, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 2Instituto de Pesca, Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura e Pesca, Santos, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento e Uso de Recursos Renováveis, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, Km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil 4Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação de Auditoria Ambiental, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 5Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade de Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil *Corresponding author: Matheus Marcos Rotundo: [email protected] ROTUNDO, M.M., SEVERINO-RODRIGUES, E., BARRELLA, W., PETRERE JUNIOR, M., RAMIRES, M. Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 19(1): e20170432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0432 Abstract: Demersal fishery resources are abundant on continental shelves, on the tropical and subtropical coasts, making up a significant part of the marine environment. Marine demersal fishery resources are captured by various fishing methods, often unsustainably, which has led to the depletion of their stocks. In order to inventory the marine demersal ichthyofauna on the Southern Brazilian coast, as well as their conservation status and distribution, this study analyzed the composition and frequency of occurrence of fish captured by pair trawling in 117 fishery fleet landings based in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedar50-Rd30
    Stock Complexes for Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Mexico Nicholas A. Farmer, Richard P. Malinowski, Mary F. McGovern, and Peter J. Rubec SEDAR50-RD30 22 July 2016 Marine and Coastal Fisheries Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science ISSN: (Print) 1942-5120 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/umcf20 Stock Complexes for Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Mexico Nicholas A. Farmer, Richard P. Malinowski, Mary F. McGovern & Peter J. Rubec To cite this article: Nicholas A. Farmer, Richard P. Malinowski, Mary F. McGovern & Peter J. Rubec (2016) Stock Complexes for Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Mexico, Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 8:1, 177-201, DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2015.1024359 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2015.1024359 Published with license by the American Fisheries Society© Nicholas A. Farmer, Richard P. Malinowski, Mary F. McGovern, and Peter J. Rubec Published online: 26 May 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 379 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=umcf20 Download by: [216.215.241.165] Date: 22 July 2016, At: 08:08 Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 8:177–201, 2016 Published with license by the American Fisheries Society ISSN: 1942-5120 online DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2015.1024359 SPECIAL SECTION: SPATIAL ANALYSIS, MAPPING, AND MANAGEMENT OF MARINE FISHERIES Stock Complexes for Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Mexico Nicholas A. Farmer* and Richard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Incorporation of Quantitative Indicators of Ecosystem
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Identification and incorporation of quantitative indicators of ecosystem function into single-species fishery stock assessment models and the associated biological reference points Melissa Hedges Monk Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Monk, Melissa Hedges, "Identification and incorporation of quantitative indicators of ecosystem function into single-species fishery stock assessment models and the associated biological reference points" (2012). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 476. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/476 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. IDENTIFICATION AND INCORPORATION OF QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS OF ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION INTO SINGLE-SPECIES FISHERY STOCK ASSESSMENT MODELS AND THE ASSOCIATED BIOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Melissa Monk B.S., Virginia Tech, 2004 M.S., Virginia Tech, 2007 August 2012 DEDICATION To my husband Dr. Joshua Monk, for his support during my pursuit of a doctoral degree. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my major advisor, Dr. Joseph Powers for all of his valuable insight, support, advice, and for challenging me as a student and scientist over the past four years.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • MRAG South Atlantic PSA Draft Report
    South Atlantic Species Productivity – Susceptibility Analyses Draft Report To the Lenfest Ocean Program MRAG Americas 65 Eastern Avenue, Unit B2C Essex, MA 01929 Ph. 978-768-3880 Fax. 978-768-3878 www.mragamericas.com August 27, 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Risk Based Assessment ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Information Collection ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 A Note about our Productivity Susceptibility Analysis Methodology................................................ 3 2 Non Snapper/Grouper Species ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Pink Shrimp, Penaeus [Farfantepenaeus] duorarum ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Snapper/Grouper Complex .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Groupers .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Snapper.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Catches and Fishing Effort of the Southeast United States Headboat Fleet, 1972-1982
    DRAFT SEDAR7_DW-19 Estimating Catches and Fishing Effort of the Southeast United States Headboat Fleet, 1972-1982 by Robert L. Dixon and Gene R. Huntsman United states Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Center Beaufort Laboratory Beaufort, NC 28516-9722 CONTENTS Abstract SEDAR7_DW-19 Introduction Methods Acquisition of Data Data Processing catch Estimation Species categories Results List of Catch Tables Citations Tables Figures ABSTRACT SEDAR7_DW-19 Catches and headboat fleet fishing effort were estimated of for the southeast United North Carolina and states South Carolina, 1972-1975; North Carolina to Ponce Inlet, Florida, 1976- 1977: and North Carolina to Key West, Florida, 1978-1982. For 224 species reported in estimated from daily the catches, catch logs numbers of kept by individuals were Estimated total vessel personnel. weight by species was calculated from estimated catches and average weights obtained from dockside samples. 1979-1982, an average of 367,000 angler days/year applied From from approximately 95 vessels resulted in an average catch of 1,928 mt per year. Importance of species to the headboat fishery varied by area. By weight, red porgy and black sea bass were most important in North Carolina and South Carolina: vermilion snapper and black sea bass in Georgia, northeast Florida and Cape Canaveral, Florida; king mackerel and yellowtail snapper in southeast Florida: yellowtail snapper and white grunt in the Florida Keys. and INTRODUCTION SEDAR7_DW-19 Estimates of catch and effort expended by anglers fishing from headboats operating along the southeast coast of the u.s. since 1972 are presented as an update and expansion of data reported earlier by Huntsman (1976 a,b).
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]