DOCSLIB.ORG

RANO-HP) EX-POST EVALUATION WASH Ex-Post Evaluation Series – Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RANO-HP) EX-POST EVALUATION WASH Ex-Post Evaluation Series – Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project PHOTO CREDIT: MAMY TIANA RAKOTOARIMANANA EVALUATION REPORT MADAGASCAR RURAL ACCESS TO NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEALTH AND PROSPERITY (RANO-HP) EX-POST EVALUATION WASH Ex-Post Evaluation Series – Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project June 2017 This document was produced for review by USAID. It was prepared by ECODIT LLC and Social Impact Inc. Under the Water CKM Project, IDIQ NO. AID-OAA-I-14-00069; TASK ORDER NO. AID-OAA-TO-15-00046. AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID under the Water and Development Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract No. AID-OAA-I-14-00069, Task Order No. AID-OAA-TO-15-00046, awarded September 17, 2015, entitled “Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project.” This final report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECODIT LLC and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. This report was prepared by the Water CKM project team, comprised of ECODIT LLC and Social Impact Inc. I | E3/WATER CKM PROJECT – RANO-HP EVALUATION USAID.GOV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the implementing partners Catholic Relief Services (CRS), CARE, Caritas, and Voahary Salama for their availability for questions throughout the planning and execution of this evaluation. We would also like to thank Jonathan Annis and Avo Ratoarijaona of CARE and Chris Seremet of CRS, in particular, for answering our countless requests for documentation and for their consistent high-quality feedback. We are grateful to Joshua Poole of CRS for keeping his door open to us throughout the evaluation process. We are appreciative of the Malagasy Raitra Consulting Company for providing us with the endline data set from the 2013 evaluation they conducted of RANO-HP. We are also grateful to Agence Capsule for conducting the 2016 household survey and open defecation free verification and to our qualitative research team for their high-quality work and for all their efforts in reaching remote locations to interview beneficiaries of RANO-HP. The local qualitative team included Jean Eugene Injerona, Mamy Tiana Rakotoarimanana, Jocelyn Rakotonirina, and Neila Andrianaina. We would also like to thank Amédé Abdérémane Rafidimanatsoa for teaching Capsule enumerators the RANO-HP open defecation free verification process. Finally, we would like to thank everyone who took the time to speak with us about RANO-HP. USAID.GOV E3/WATER CKM PROJECT – RANO-HP EVALUATION | II TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... vi Background and Methods ........................................................................................................................................... vi Findings .......................................................................................................................................................................... vii Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................................. viii Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ x Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Brief Overview of activity and Budget ..................................................................................................................... 1 Evaluation Questions .................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 7 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Quantitative Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Qualitative Methods ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Limitations..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Evaluation Question 1: To What Extent Are the Levels of Sanitation Facility Functionality and Hygiene Usage/Behaviors That Were Measured at the Close of the RANO-HP Activity Still Observed Three Years Later? .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Evaluation Question 2: Which Factors Influenced the Ability to Sustain Sanitation and Hygiene Facilities and Behaviors? Why? ................................................................................................................................. 18 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 23 Evaluation Question 1: To What Extent Are the Levels of Sanitation Facility Functionality and Hygiene Usage/Behaviors That Were Measured at the Close of the RANO-HP Activity Still Observed Three Years Later? .................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Evaluation Question 2: Which Factors Influenced the Ability to Sustain Sanitation and Hygiene Facilities and Behaviors? Why? ................................................................................................................................. 24 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 27 III | E3/WATER CKM PROJECT – RANO-HP EVALUATION USAID.GOV FIGURES Figure 1. Three-year sustainability of key RANO-HP sanitation and hygiene outcomes (HH survey) ..... vii Figure 2. RANO-HP Implementers, Activity Locations, and Locations of Evaluation Data Collection …...2 Figure 3. Map of RANO-HP intervention areas ......................................................................................................... 3 Figure 4. Three-year sustainability of latrine use outcomes (HH survey) ......................................................... 12 Figure 5. Three-year latrine use (private or shared) sustainability, by region (HH survey) .......................... 13 Figure 6. A monoblock with attendant in Ilaka Est, Atsinanana Region. ............................................................ 14 Figure 7. Three-year sustainability of handwashing outcomes (HH survey) ..................................................... 15 Figure 8. Three-year sustainability of handwashing station, by region (HH survey) ....................................... 16 Figure 9. Three-year sustainability of additional hygiene and water outcomes (HH survey) ........................ 16 Figure 10. A latrine with a washable slab and tippy tap in Anosy Region .......................................................... 19 USAID.GOV E3/WATER CKM PROJECT – RANO-HP EVALUATION | IV ACRONYMS BCC Behavior Change Communication CHW Community Health Worker CKM Communications and Knowledge Management CLTS Community-Led Total Sanitation CRS Catholic Relief Services CWSBP Commune Water and Sanitation Business Plan E3 USAID Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and Environment E3/W USAID/E3 Water Office FAA Fonds d’Appui Pour l’Assainissement GSF Global Sanitation Fund FGD Focus Group Discussion GOM Government of Madagascar HH Household IDIQ Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity KII Key Informant Interview MFI Microfinance Institution NGO Nongovernmental Organization ODF Open Defecation Free PPP Public-Private Partnership RANO-HP Rural Access to New Opportunities for Health and Prosperity SIT Sustainability Index Tool SO Strategic Objective UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund USAID US Agency for International Development VSLA Village Savings and Loan Association WADI Water and Development Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract WASH Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene WHO World Health Organization WSSCC Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council V | E3/WATER CKM PROJECT – RANO-HP EVALUATION USAID.GOV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND METHODS In the first of a series of independent ex-post evaluations of USAID–funded water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) activities, this ex-post performance evaluation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rano HP Et Ranon'ala
    EVALUATION OF THE USAID/MADAGASCAR WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE BILATERAL PROJECTS: RANO HP ET RANON’ALA September 2014 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by CAETIC Développement ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Jean-Claude RANDRIANARISOA, COR, for his constant guidance during this whole assignment. Discussions and exchanges we had with him were always fruitful and encouraging and of a high technical level. This document could not have reached this level of quality without the invaluable inputs from Jacky Ralaiarivony and from USAID Madagascar Program Office staff, namely Vololontsoa Raharimalala. The authors: Balsama ANDRIANTSEHENO Jean Marie RAKOTOVAO Ramy RAZAFINDRALAMBO Jean Herivelo RAKOTONDRAINIBE FINAL EVALUATION OF USAID/MADAGASCAR WSSH PROJECTS: EVALUATION OF THE USAID/MADAGASCAR WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE BILATERAL PROJECTS: RANO HP ET RANON’ALA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 CONTRACT N° AID-687-C-13-00004 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lettre D'information Du Programme RHYVIERE
    Avril ‐ Mai 2010 Lettre d’information du programme RHYVIERE Le mois de juin Les projets pilotes de réseaux hydroélectriques RHYVIERE Tolongoina Tolongoina Sahasinaka/Fenomby/ Ampasimbe Onibe Sabotsy Namatoana ► Sélection du délégataire finalisée ► Promotion de l’Appel d’Offres Mahabako ► Mission pour valider une nouvelle ► Mission de jaugeage du débit ► Convention de financement signée dans la presse ► Finalisation de l’APS position pour la centrale avec l’ADER et un missionnaire ► Début de l’APD cambodgien du GRET Cambodge ► Réunion de lancement du nouvel ► Mission de restitution de l’APS à ► Finalisation des études techni‐ AO (une trentaine de BE pré‐ ques et socio‐économiques de Sahasinaka Fenomby Mahabako Sahasinaka en présence des 3 Les autres projets sents) et AO pendant 6 semaines communes l’APS (avec l’extension à Foule‐ ► Finalisation de l’étude avec extension (Andoharanomaintso, Sahatona) ► Analyse des offres et présélec‐ pointe) à Fenomby et Mahabako ► Création de l’OPCI tion d’un délégataire « électrification » par les trois ► Suivi de la pluviométrie et de ► Dépôt du dossier à l’ORE et l’Ader 2010. Ambohimahasina ► Mission de l’IRD sur les PSE communes ciblées l’hydrologie par la population avril ► Recensement de la population Ampasimbe Onibe / Ambatofotsy 28 le ► Ambatofotsy ► Restitution de la reconnaissance Suite de la rédaction des APS CITE ► Finalisation de l’étude d’APS ► Formation de l’équipe communa‐ au le au projet, lancement de l’APS Ambohimahasina ► Mission de terrain de l’équipe techni‐ que et socio économique
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Chromoblastomycosis Caused Predominantly by Fonsecaea Nubica, Madagascar
    Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.191498 Endemic Chromoblastomycosis Caused Predominantly by Fonsecaea nubica, Madagascar Appendix Appendix Table. Characteristics of clinical isolates from patients with suspected chromoblastomycosis in Madagascar and reference strains used in this study* Panfugal PCR for S/C Specific PCR for S/C MALDI-ToF GenBank accession no. Ccar- Code Species for D1D2, ITS Source Origin NL-1/NL-4 ITS1/ITS4 F/Ccar-R Fon-F/Fon-R MSP ID MYC04002 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Vatovavy Fitovinany N/P P/N N/N N/NA NA NA MYC04004 Fonsecaea sp. NA, NA Biopsy Vatovavy Fitovinany P/P P/NA N/NA N/P NA NA MYC08006 Fonsecaea sp. MK828325, NA Biopsy Analanjirofo P/P P/NA N/N N/P NA NA MYC10010 Fonsecaea sp. NA, NA Biopsy Melaky P/P P/NA N/NA P/P NA NA MYC10011 Fonsecaea sp. NA, NA Squama Vatovavy Fitovinany P/P P/NA N/NA P/P NA NA MYC10014 Cladophialophora carrionii MK828362, MK820046 Squama Androy P/P P/P N/P N/N X NA MYC03022 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Sofia NA/NA NA/NA N/NA NA/NA NA NA MYC04026 Fonsecaea nubica MK828326, MK828125 Biopsy Alaotra Mangoro N/P N/P NA/N NA/P NA X MYC05032 F. nubica MK828327, MK828124 Squama Amoron I Mania N/P N/P NA/N NA/P NA NA MYC06033 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Androy N/P N/P NA/N NA/N NA NA MYC08040 C. carrionii MK828363, MK820047 Biopsy Atsimo Andrefana N/P N/P NA/P NA/N NA NA MYC09041 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Analamanga NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA NA NA NA MYC03048 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Vakinankaratra N/P N/N N/N N/N NA NA MYC06057 Unidentified NA, NA Biopsy Amoron I Mania P/P N/N N/N N/N NA NA MYC06059 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidats Fenerive Est Ambatoharanana 1
    NOMBRE DISTRICT COMMUNE ENTITE NOM ET PRENOM(S) CANDIDATS CANDIDATS GROUPEMENT DE P.P MMM (Malagasy Miara FENERIVE EST AMBATOHARANANA 1 KOMPA Justin Miainga) GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRMAR (Isika Rehetra Miarka FENERIVE EST AMBATOHARANANA 1 RAVELOSAONA Rasolo Amin'ny Andry Rajoelina) GROUPEMENT DE P.P MMM (Malagasy Miara FENERIVE EST AMBODIMANGA II 1 SABOTSY Patrice Miainga) GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRMAR (Isika Rehetra Miarka FENERIVE EST AMBODIMANGA II 1 RAZAFINDRAFARA Elyse Emmanuel Amin'ny Andry Rajoelina) FENERIVE EST AMBODIMANGA II 1 INDEPENDANT TELO ADRIEN (Telo Adrien) TELO Adrien AMPASIMBE INDEPENDANT BOTOFASINA ANDRE (Botofasina FENERIVE EST 1 BOTOFASINA Andre MANANTSANTRANA Andre) AMPASIMBE GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRMAR (Isika Rehetra Miarka FENERIVE EST 1 VELONORO Gilbert MANANTSANTRANA Amin'ny Andry Rajoelina) AMPASIMBE FENERIVE EST 1 GROUPEMENT DE P.P MTS (Malagasy Tonga Saina) ROBIA Maurille MANANTSANTRANA AMPASIMBE INDEPENDANT KOESAKA ROMAIN (Koesaka FENERIVE EST 1 KOESAKA Romain MANANTSANTRANA Romain) AMPASIMBE INDEPENDANT TALEVANA LAURENT GERVAIS FENERIVE EST 1 TALEVANA Laurent Gervais MANANTSANTRANA (Talevana Laurent Gervais) GROUPEMENT DE P.P MMM (Malagasy Miara FENERIVE EST AMPASINA MANINGORY 1 RABEFIARIVO Sabotsy Miainga) GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRMAR (Isika Rehetra Miarka FENERIVE EST AMPASINA MANINGORY 1 CLOTAIRE Amin'ny Andry Rajoelina) INDEPENDANT ROBERT MARCELIN (Robert FENERIVE EST ANTSIATSIAKA 1 ROBERT Marcelin Marcelin) GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRMAR (Isika Rehetra Miarka FENERIVE EST ANTSIATSIAKA 1 KOANY Arthur Amin'ny Andry Rajoelina)
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
    Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • RAPPORT D'activité 2015-2016 Projet D'adaptation De La Gestion Des Zones Côtières Au Changement Climatique
    17' 0( (/ 1( ¶( 1 & 2 2 5 / , 2 9 * 1 , ( ( ¶ / ( 7 ( ' ' ( ( 6 5 ) ( 2 7 6 5 , ( 1 , 7 6 0 MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DE L’ECOLOGIE ET DES FORETS SECRETARIAT GENERAL BUREAU NATIONAL DE COORDINATION DES CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES RAPPORT D'ACTIVITÉ 2015-2016 Projet d'Adaptation de la gestion des zones côtières au changement climatique PROJET D’AdaptatioN DE LA GESTION DES ZONES CÔTIÈRES AU CHANGEMENT CLIMatiQUE Etant un pays insulaire, Madagascar est Plusieurs actions ont été entreprises par le considéré comme l’un des pays les plus projet d’Adaptation de la gestion des Zones SOMMAIRE vulnérables à la variabilité et aux changements Côtières au changement climatique en tenant climatiques. Les dits changements se compte de l’Amélioration des écosystèmes CONTEXTE 5 manifestent surtout par le «chamboulement et des moyens de subsistance » au cours du régime des pluviométries, l’augmentation de l’année 2016 comme la réalisation des COMPOSANTE 1 : RENForcement DES capacITÉS de la température, la montée du niveau de études de vulnérabilité dans les quatre zones INSTITUTIONNELLES AUX Impacts DU CHANGEMENT la mer et l’intensification des évènements d’intervention, la création d’un mécanisme de CLImatIQUE DANS LES SITES DU proJET climatiques extrêmes tels que les cyclones, les coordination et la mise en place de la Gestion (MENABE, BOENY, VatovavY FItovINANY ET ATSINANANA) 7 inondations et les sècheresses. Devant cette Intégrée des zones côtières dans les régions situation alarmante, des actions d’adaptation Atsinanana, Boeny, et Vatovavy Fitovinany, ainsi COMPOSANTE 2 : RÉHABILItatION ET GESTION DES ZONES sont déja mises en oeuvre à Madagascar afin de que la mise en œuvre des scénarios climatiques CÔTIÈRES EN VUE d’uNE RÉSILIENCE À LONG TERME 17 renforcer la résilience de la population locale et à l’échelle réduite de ces quatre régions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 COAG No. 72068718CA00001
    COAG No. 72068718CA00001 1 TABLE OF CONTENT I- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 6 II- INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 III- MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS DURING QUARTER 1 ........................................................................................................... 10 III.1. IR 1: Enhanced coordination among the public, nonprofit, and commercial sectors for reliable supply and distribution of quality health products ........................................................................................................................... 10 III.2. IR2: Strengthened capacity of the GOM to sustainably provide quality health products to the Malagasy people 15 III.3. IR 3: Expanded engagement of the commercial health sector to serve new health product markets, according to health needs and consumer demand ........................................................................................................ 36 III.4. IR 4: Improved sustainability of social marketing to deliver affordable, accessible health products to the Malagasy people ............................................................................................................................................................. 48 III.5. IR5: Increased demand for and use of health products among the Malagasy people
    [Show full text]
  • Universite D'antananarivo
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE MEMOIRE Pour l’obtention du diplôme de MAITRISE DES SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES EN GEOPHYSIQUE APPLIQUEE Option : Mines et Environnement Intitulé ETUDE DES ZONES FAVORABLES EN MINERALISATION AURIFERE ET EN EMERAUDE DANS LA COMMUNE RURALE D’ANDRORANGAVOLA, DISTRICT D’IFANADIANA, REGION VATOVAVY FITOVINANY Présenté par RANTOSOA Andriharizafy Devant la commission d’examen composée de : Président : RANDRIAMANANTANY Zely Arivelo Professeur Titulaire Rapporteur : RASOLOMANANA Eddy Professeur Examinateurs: RANDRIANJA Roger Professeur RAZAFINDRAKOTO Boni Gauthier Docteur Le 29 Décembre 2008 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE MEMOIRE Pour l’obtention du diplôme de MAITRISE DES SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES EN GEOPHYSIQUE APPLIQUEE Option : Mines et Environnement Intitulé ETUDE DES ZONES FAVORABLES EN MINERALISATION AURIFERE ET EN EMERAUDE DANS LA COMMUNE RURALE D’ANDRORANGAVOLA, DISTRICT D’IFANADIANA, REGION VATOVAVY FITOVINANY Présenté par RANTOSOA Andriharizafy Devant la commission d’examen composée de : Président : RANDRIAMANANTANY Zely Arivelo Professeur Titulaire Rapporteur : RASOLOMANANA Eddy Professeur Examinateurs: RANDRIANJA Roger Professeur RAZAFINDRAKOTO Boni Gauthier Docteur Le 29 Décembre 2008 REMERCIEMENTS En préambule de ce mémoire, je souhaite adresser ici mes vifs remerciements à toutes personnes qui, de près ou de loin, ont contribué à l'élaboration de ce mémoire tout particulièrement les personnes citées ci après : Madame RANDRIAMANANTANY Zely Arivelo , Professeur Titulaire, Chef du Département de Physique, qui a bien voulu présidé le membre de jury. Monsieur le Professeur RANAIVO Nomenjanahary Flavien , Directeur de l’ Institut et Observatoire de Géophysique d’Antananarivo (IOGA), Responsable Pédagogique de la formation en Maîtrise des Science et Technique en Géophysique Appliqué (MSTGA), et qui m’a accepté d’être parmi ses étudiants au sein dudit établissement.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar Cyclone Enawo
    Antalaha ! ! MA002_10 ! ! Mandritsara Tsaratanana Mahanoro ! Andilambe ! Manambolosy Vanono ! Sahavia ! Behota Vanono Vanono Antsirabe Fanorah!ana Centre Manambolosy Ambalaben'Ifasina ! Ampanafanana Ambinaniboka ! Antsirabato ! Mahalina ! ! ! Ambodisatrana I Andasibe I Ambodiampana Fahambahy Antsiatsiaka ! ! Antsirat!enina Tsaratanana! Lampibe Andapanampambo ! Ambodimanga Ankoetrika ! ! Ambodiampana ! ! Aniribe Ankoba Bealampona ! ! Fitana Mananara !Marotandrano ! ! Fitana Marovato Ambodimadiro ! Riamena Avaratra Soavinarivo ! MANANARA Saromaona ! ! ! ! Analalava ! Marotandr!ano Mahatsinjo Sahazono ! ! Ambodivoanio Ambohim!ahavelona Befoza Ambodisatrana ! Andilamboahangy Antsirakivolo Ambodifano ! ! ! ! ! Ambodirotra ! ! Ambohipierenana Amboditangena ! Ambohimahavelona Ambodivoanio ! Mahafinaritra Tsarahasina Imorona Ambodisatrana ! ! Ambodivoangibe Vodivohitra Ambatofitarafana Antsiraka ! ! ! Ambatambaky ! Antanetilava ! Antsirabe Ambalavary Mananara-Avaratra ! Seranambe ! ! ! Makadabo Ambohimena ! Vohibe Antanambe ! Antanambao!be ! ! Antenina Andaparatibe ! Antsiraka Ambodisatrana Antanananivo ! ! Imorona Antsiatsiaka ! Antanambaon'amberina Antanananivo Sandrakatsy ! Fasina ! Sandrakatsy Sahasoa ! Antambontsona ! Ambodivato Ambodimanga ! Tanibe ! Fahatrosy ! Ambodimangatelo ! Sahakondro ! ANTANAMBAON'AMBERINA Antevialabe Belalona ! ! ! Ambatoharanana ! Antanambe Antsahamaloto ! Ambodimapay ! ! Ampasina ! Sahavoay Andranombazaha ! ! Analambola Antanambe ! ! Ambatoharanana Sahasoa Antevialabe ! ! Antenina Ampatakamaroreny Antenina Antanetilava
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy 171 (2021) 747E763
    Renewable Energy 171 (2021) 747e763 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene Analysis and comparison of potential resources and new energy policy of Madagascar island; A review * Modeste Kameni Nematchoua a, b, a Beneficiary of an AXA Research Fund Postdoctoral Grant, Research Leaders Fellowships, AXA SA, 25 Avenue Matignon, 75008, Paris, France b University of Liege, Urban AndEnvironmental Engineering Department, Local Environment Management & Analysis (LEMA), Allee de La Decouverte9, Quartier Polytech 1, BE-4000, Liege, Belgium article info abstract Article history: The aim of this research is to review the status and current trends about energy resources production Received 23 November 2019 potential and new energy policies in Madagascar to suggest possible solutions to help the government in Received in revised form its sustainable policy development. The results of this investigation showed that, nowadays in 9 February 2021 Madagascar, more than 80% of natural potential is remaining not exploited. What is more, in order to Accepted 14 February 2021 satisfy the demand of energy, the country will need to use up to 12,000 MW of its hydroelectric potential Available online 2 March 2021 and 10% of its solar potential that can be easily reached with a good energy policy. In this sense, an operating of only 20% of solar, hydraulic and wind power resources, in Madagascar, can cover the energy Keywords: fi Resource potential needs of all ve Indian Ocean countries on several years and, in particular, solar potential resulted sig- fi New energy policy ni cant in coastal zone of Madagascar.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Districts A1
    Desserte en eau par commune Décembre 2014 48°40'0"E dans le49°0'0s"E 3 Districts 49°20'0"E 49°40'0"E S S " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 2 2 ° ° 6 6 1 Analanjirofo ± 1 SS oo ff ii aa P Antenina M a n o m p a n a . S S " " 0 0 ' 2 AEPG ' 0 0 4 4 ° ° 6 6 1 39 FPMH 1 P Ambahoabe P A m b o d i a m p a n a . 2 PPMH FID P A n t a n i f o t s y P 1 AEPG "Commune" 21 FPMH et PPMH Fotsialanana Andapafito P P P AA nn aa ll aa nn jj ii rr oo ff oo S o a n i e r a n a I v o n g o . 1 AEPG JIRAMA 7 AEPG autres S S " " 0 0 ' 26 PPMH ' 0 0 ° ° 7 7 1 A n t s i a t s i a k a . 15 Puits 1 1 AEPG MATEZA 15 PMH MATEZA P P A m p a s i m b e M a n a n t s a t r a n a . 1 AEPG "Province" 45 PPMH Vohipeno P AA ll aa oo tt rr aa MM aa nn gg oo rr oo S a r a n a m b a n a . Miorimivalana A m p a s i n a M a n i n g o r y. 2 AEPG MATEZA P V o h i l e n g o P 6 AEPG 2 AEPG FIKRIFAMA 1 AEPG en cours 2 AEPG en cours 2 PPMH 15 FPMH et PPMH 2 villages ratés 28 Puits P 1 Station Ranontsika A n d a s i b e A m b a t o h a r a n a n a .
    [Show full text]