Some Aspects of the Development of Christian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Aspects of the Development of Christian Abstract. This text tries to draw a general view of the development of the Christian th th Orthodox art in the 16 and 17 centuries. The author represents in brief the main SOME ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT monuments and artists during the above OF CHRISTIAN ORTHODOX ART IN THE period on the Balkans as well as the 16th AND 17th CENTURIES: THE TESTIMONY interactions between different cultures in historical context. Special interest is given OF CHURCH INSCRIPTIONS to the art appeared on Mount Athos and the AND ARTISTS’ SIGNATURES role of Patriarchate of Constantinople as a political and spiritual factor in the Ottoman empire and their influence in the Trans- Danubian principalities. Most of the existing bibliography on this subject is presented and analyzed. In his critical reading of the available publication E. Moutafov suggests for instance that it is more accurate to speak about Cretan Emmanuel Moutafov1 painters on Mount Athos, rather than about the presence of a Cretan school in the (Sofia) artistic processes there. On the hand, when speaking of Western/ European influences, on the Balkans, inscriptions on frescoes in he believes that the influencing side should Orthodox churches continued to be the be interested as well, i.e. the West should same in the 16th century as the ones during have been interested in its influence over the two previous centuries. This means for the Christian East, which is not Moutafov that the ethnic profile of painters, documented. It is important to note the clergy, and users of this art remained the observation made here, that during the same. A century later, however, a preparation of the mural programs for the hellenization process began with varying temples in Bulgarian lands, the artists used intensity and two forms of manifestation – a Greek-language painter’s manual of the by the direct use of Greek and manuals in type of the First Jerusalem Manuscript, or Greek or by encouraging the use of the of the so-called hermeneia of the priest local language, for instance in the Daniel. Also interesting noting is that the monuments in Romania from the 17th Russian “лицевые подлинники” appeared century. In this the author agrees with around the same time, which is evidence for Helen Evans’ insight that the year 1557, a common need of established models when the term “Byzantium” appeared in across the Orthodox world, regardless of research, was in fact an important date for the political situation of the lands where the the Christian East because it marked the specific monuments were located. Until end of the medieval Orthodox tradition and then for the author there was no need for its transition into the pre-modern period. written manuals since the tradition was alive and art was passed on from teacher to Keywords: Artists’signatures; Christian student and by imitation from good models. Orthodox Art; Church in Dobrasko village; This does not mean that painters did not Church inscriptions; Church of St Demetrios make preparatory sketches (anthivola) or of Boboshevo village; Docheiariou did not collect them. One thing is certain monastery; Dzordzis; First Jerusalem though: in spite of the Ottomans’ presence Manuscript; Frangos Katelanos; Great REV. ROUM. HIST. ART, Série BEAUX-ARTS, TOME LIV–LV, P. 47–64, BUCAREST, 2017–2018 47 Lavra, Gyromeri monastery; Mount Athos; remained the only sustainer of Orthodoxy Hellenisation process; Hermeneia of the during the period of the Ottoman rule, priest Daniel; St Niketas’ church in Cucer because the Trans-Danubian principalities village; Theophanes the Cretan. were subjected to the Sultan but kept only their internal governance. Therefore various Back at the end of the 15th century the Moldowallachian rulers were founders or Sultan Mehmed II conferred on the donors of churches on Mount Athos. This Patriarch of Constantinople Gennadius fact determines the tolerant attitude of the Scholarios the right to represent all Greek clergy to the ministry and writing in Christians subjected to the Sublime Porte. Church Slavonic in the first centuries of the Thus the Ecumenical Throne became the Ottoman occupation on the Balkans. In only legitimate Orthodox institution within some areas, however, the Phanariot policy the Empire. To an extent the Patriarchate of replaced it by stimulating the creation of a Constantinople, with the Ottomans’ help, local literary tradition, as it has happened in the lands of present-day Romania from the gained for the first time independence from th 2 political power as well as control over the 17 century onwards . old autonomous Slavic churches, which had been unthinkable prior to the 15th c. This Before it was conquered by the was marked in a peculiar manner when in Ottomans in 1669, the island of Crete was 1526 Ioannes, a tailor from Ioannina, was also a powerful artistic centre. Between tortured and burnt by the Ottomans in 1453-1526, the existence of 120 painters in Istanbul, thus becoming the first new Heraklion was documented. They painted martyr of the transformed Byzantine mostly icons, adhering either to the strict Church. The cult towards him immediately Byzantine tradition, or to the Maniera spread throughout the empire and gave rise Italiana. Urban centers in the Balkans did to a multitude of new martyrs, not have such conditions because the strengthening the influence of the Greek Ottomans imposed restrictions on the Patriarchate. Thirty years later the Patriarch construction of new churches and short Joassaph founded in the Ottoman capital a deadlines for repair works on the old priest school, thanks to the financial temples. Exceptions were some urban support from Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible, centers such as Ioannina (until 1611) and with which the Greeks filled both the Athens, where due to certain privileges for the local population greater construction religious and the education gap in th Orthodoxy at the time. During the second took place in the 16 century. half of the 16th c. small parish schools also Thus the centres of artistic activity operated in Athens, Thessaloniki, Ioannina, naturally became monasteries where the islands of Chios and Patmos, etc. In monumental art and architecture developed 1577 a Greek college was founded in Rome following the medieval patterns. Representatives of the so-called Art school as an attempt to attract the Sultan’s subjects th to Catholicism, but also as recognition for of Castoria from the late 15 and the early 16th c. worked on the old katholikon of the the prestige of the Greek element and the 3 Greek language in Orthodoxy, which was Transfiguration monastery in Meteora , on the St Nikita church, in the village of why the college was equipped with a 4 printing press and the Holy Bible was Chucher (Fig. 1), etc. Donors and founders translated into the common Greek were mostly representatives of the high language. The Constantinopolitan Patriarch clergy. The Voevods of Moldowallachia Jeremiah II appointed the Moscow bishop and Russian tsars were supporters of the Job for patriarch in 1589 as token of the canon and tradition and they donated funds for the decoration of churches mostly in the support provided for preserving Orthodoxy 5 48 within the Ottoman Empire. In fact Russia Holy Mountain . Fig. 1 – Detail of the mural decoration at the St Niketas’ church in Cucer village, FYROM, 15th century. The Fall of Constantinople in Ottoman The painting of the first layer of the hands was an event that stained European decoration of the old katholik on of this culture and shifted its balance, which monastery can be attributed to the same naturally had an impact on art in Mount workshop. An image of the Dormition of the Athos. From the 16th century on the Virgin Mary has survived as well. It is Athonite monasteries, unprepared for such located at the entrance of the Protaton church burden, would replace the Constantinopolitan from 1511-1512, where all the stylistic centers as leaders because they were features later typical for the so-called Cretan granted a special status and privileges in the School, named after the origins of its two Ottoman legislation. On the other hand, most renowned representatives6 were already their main patrons and donors became the present. rulers on the other side of the Danube Also noteworthy is the fact that a little because the dynasties of Byzantine rulers in before the appearance of Theophanes the Constantinople were wiped out. These two Cretan, a painting workshop functioned on factors became fundamental to the design of the monastic peninsula, transferring the new monumental painting in the most through its brushes entirely different important spiritual center of Orthodoxy – traditions and perception of the world. Its Athos – and this would reflect on the art work included the frescoes in the St John across the Balkans because of the undeniable the Baptist chapel in Protaton (1525-1526), theological authority of the ascetic and the ones in the St Blasios church in the monastic peninsula. The frescoes from the Great Lavra (1528-1529) and in chapels, in refectory of the Xenophontos monastery have the cells of Flaskas in Karies and of been preserved since the late 15th century. Fakinos close to the Pantokrator monastery. 49 Fig. 2 – St Menas the Egyptian, by Theophanes Strelitsas-Bathas, Katholikonof the Stavronikita monastery, Mount Athos, 16th century. The style of these painters is characterized without exception the repainting of existing by a purity of line and bright colours, and mural ensembles in the landmark cult their work is rightfully linked to the centers of Mount Athos and in Thessaly to influence of Ohrid and its painting heritage the artistic teams of the Cretan painters from the 15th century.7 Theophanes Stelitzas-Batas and Dzordzis. During the reign of Suleiman the It is through them that during the second Magnificent (1522-1560) there were and third quarters of the 16th century, mural favourable conditions for cultural and painting would have its second prosperous economic growth of subjected populations.
Recommended publications
  • Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Monasteries
    Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Monasteries Atlas of Whether used as a scholarly introduction into Eastern Christian monasticism or researcher’s directory or a travel guide, Alexei Krindatch brings together a fascinating collection of articles, facts, and statistics to comprehensively describe Orthodox Christian Monasteries in the United States. The careful examina- Atlas of American Orthodox tion of the key features of Orthodox monasteries provides solid academic frame for this book. With enticing verbal and photographic renderings, twenty-three Orthodox monastic communities scattered throughout the United States are brought to life for the reader. This is an essential book for anyone seeking to sample, explore or just better understand Orthodox Christian monastic life. Christian Monasteries Scott Thumma, Ph.D. Director Hartford Institute for Religion Research A truly delightful insight into Orthodox monasticism in the United States. The chapters on the history and tradition of Orthodox monasticism are carefully written to provide the reader with a solid theological understanding. They are then followed by a very human and personal description of the individual US Orthodox monasteries. A good resource for scholars, but also an excellent ‘tour guide’ for those seeking a more personal and intimate experience of monasticism. Thomas Gaunt, S.J., Ph.D. Executive Director Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) This is a fascinating and comprehensive guide to a small but important sector of American religious life. Whether you want to know about the history and theology of Orthodox monasticism or you just want to know what to expect if you visit, the stories, maps, and directories here are invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxi-Catalogue 2014 Maxi-Catalogue 2014
    maxi-catalogue 2014 maxi-catalogue 2014 New publications coming from Alexander Press: 1. Διερχόμενοι διά τού Ναού [Passing Through the Nave], by Dimitris Mavropoulos. 2. Εορτολογικά Παλινωδούμενα by Christos Yannaras. 3. SYNAXIS, The Second Anthology, 2002–2014. 4. Living Orthodoxy, 2nd edition, by Paul Ladouceur. 5. Rencontre avec λ’οrthodoxie, 2e édition, par Paul Ladouceur. 2 Alexander Press Philip Owen Arnould Sherrard CELEBR ATING . (23 September 1922 – 30 May 1995 Philip Sherrard Philip Sherrard was born in Oxford, educated at Cambridge and London, and taught at the universities of both Oxford and London, but made Greece his permanent home. A pioneer of modern Greek studies and translator, with Edmund Keeley, of Greece’s major modern poets, he wrote many books on Greek, Orthodox, philosophical and literary themes. With the Greek East G. E. H. Palmer and Bishop Kallistos Ware, he was and the also translator and editor of The Philokalia, the revered Latin West compilation of Orthodox spiritual texts from the 4th to a study in the christian tradition 15th centuries. by Philip Sherrard A profound, committed and imaginative thinker, his The division of Christendom into the Greek East theological and metaphysical writings covered issues and the Latin West has its origins far back in history but its from the division of Christendom into the Greek East consequences still affect western civilization. Sherrard seeks and Latin West, to the sacredness of man and nature and to indicate both the fundamental character and some of the the restoration of a sacred cosmology which he saw as consequences of this division. He points especially to the the only way to escape from the spiritual and ecological underlying metaphysical bases of Greek Christian thought, and contrasts them with those of the Latin West; he argues dereliction of the modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • CBM Short Catalogue : NT Corpus Explanation: Codex Type T
    CBM Short Catalogue : NT corpus Explanation: codex type T Sources 1Catalogues : of MSS per library Table I: Tetraevangelion codex type (T 0001 - 1323) Sources 4 : Catalogues of NT Mss CODEX TYPE CODE PLACE LIBRARY - HOLDING LIBRARY CODE AGE - date SCRIPT IRHT INTF: GA A T 0001 Alexandria Greek Orthodox Patriarchal Library Ms. 77 (276) 1360 AD Mn ● 904 T 0002 Alexandria Greek Orthodox Patriarchal Library Ms. 451 (119) 1381 AD Mn ● 903 St. Petersburg Russian National Library Ms. gr. 398 T 0003 (etc.) Amorgos Panagias Chozoviotissas Monastery Ms. 7 XIII Mn ● 2647 T code Amorgos Panagias Chozoviotissas Monastery Ms. 12 XIII Mn ● 1306 T code Amorgos Panagias Chozoviotissas Monastery Ms. 27 XIII Mn ● 1308 T code Amorgos Panagias Chozoviotissas Monastery Ms. 38 XIV Mn ● 1307 T code Andros Panachrantou Monastery Ms. 11 XV Mn ● 1383 T code Andros Panachrantou Monastery Ms. 43 XVI Mn ● 2630 T code Andros Zoodochou Peges (Hagias) Monastery Ms. 53 1539 AD? Mn ● 1362 T code Andros Zoodochou Peges (Hagias) Monastery Ms. 56 XIV Mn ● 1363 T code Ankara National Library of Turkey Ms. gr. 1 (548) XIV Mn ● 2439 T code Ankara National Library of Turkey Ms. gr. 2 (470) XII Mn ● 1803 T code Ankara National Library of Turkey Ms. gr. 5 (470A) XII Mn ● 1804 T code Ankara National Library of Turkey Ms. gr. 49 (7) 1668 Mn ● 1802 T code Ankara Turkish Historical Society Ms. 5 XII Mn ● 650 T code Ann Arbor, MI University of Michigan, Special Collections Library Ms. 15 XII Mn ● 543 T code Ann Arbor, MI University of Michigan, Special Collections Library Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Manolis G. Varvounis * – Nikos Rodosthenous Religious
    Manolis G. Varvounis – Nikos Rodosthenous Religious Traditions of Mount Athos on Miraculous Icons of Panagia (The Mother of God) At the monasteries and hermitages of Mount Athos, many miraculous icons are kept and exhibited, which are honored accordingly by the monks and are offered for worship to the numerous pilgrims of the holy relics of Mount Athos.1 The pil- grims are informed about the monastic traditions of Mount Athos regarding these icons, their origin, and their miraculous action, during their visit to the monasteries and then they transfer them to the world so that they are disseminated systemati- cally and they can become common knowledge of all believers.2 In this way, the traditions regarding the miraculous icons of Mount Athos become wide-spread and are considered an essential part of religious traditions not only of the Greek people but also for other Orthodox people.3 Introduction Subsequently, we will examine certain aspects of these traditions, based on the literature, notably the recent work on the miraculous icons in the monasteries of Mount Athos, where, except for the archaeological and the historical data of these specific icons, also information on the wonders, their origin and their supernatural action over the centuries is captured.4 These are information that inspired the peo- ple accordingly and are the basis for the formation of respective traditions and re- ligious customs that define the Greek folk religiosity. Many of these traditions relate to the way each icon ended up in the monastery where is kept today. According to the archetypal core of these traditions, the icon was thrown into the sea at the time of iconoclasm from a region of Asia Minor or the Near East, in order to be saved from destruction, and miraculously arrived at the monastery.
    [Show full text]
  • Stpp-CSSC Site-2018-07.Pdf
    1 THE HOLY APOSTLES PETER AND PAUL In the quiet light of the katholikon (main church) of the Karakallou Monastery on Mount Athos, a miraculous icon shines with its glow. It’s called “The Embrace” (Ὁ Ἀσπασμός), and what the prayerful contemplation sees in it is the symbolic act of togetherness. The two figures, depicted from the waist up, seizing the entire space of the icon, are embraced: the apostle Peter’s hands are almost concluded on the apostle Paul’s back, and their cheeks meet, a symbol that together they uphold the idea of the Church, that they accept to share a common destiny. A symbol, which revives pages from the story of the two apostles of Christ. The true story of Peter and Paul, in a sense, is history of the name and is associated with the metamorphosis that each of them experiences. According to the biblical tradition, after a remarkable encounter with God, the name of the person changes – a sure indication of the changed identity of that person, bearing his own name. Both Simon and Saul cannot remain with his old identity, after their lifetime intersects with that of the Savior. The way of the name for each of them, though different, is long and difficult. The one – chosen to receive the keys of the kingdom of heaven and the ability to bind and loose human destinies and to be pillar of the future church of Christ, must also experience the pain of triple denial of the Lord. The etymology of his name (“You shall be called Cephas”, John 1:42)1 is not by chance bound directly to the meaning of the rock: in order to uphold the Church, a strong support is needed, on which faith may rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox Mission Methods: a Comparative Study
    ORTHODOX MISSION METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY by STEPHEN TROMP WYNN HAYES submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject of MISSIOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Promoter: Professor W.A. Saayman JUNE 1998 Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the University of South Africa, who awarded the Chancellor's Scholarship, which enabled me to travel to Russia, the USA and Kenya to do research. I would also like to thank the Orthodox Christian Mission Center, of St Augustine, Florida, for their financial help in attending the International Orthodox Christian Mission Conference at Holy Cross Seminary, Brookline, MA, in August 1996. To Fr Thomas Hopko, and the staff of St Vladimir's Seminary in New York, for allowing me to stay at the seminary and use the library facilities. The St Tikhon's Institute in Moscow, and its Rector, Fr Vladimir Vorobiev and the staff, for their help with visa applications, and for their patience in giving me information in interviews. To the Danilov Monastery, for their help with accom­ modation while I was in Moscow, and to Fr Anatoly Frolov and all the parishioners of St Tikhon's Church in Klin, for giving me an insight into Orthodox life and mission in a small town parish. To Metropolitan Makarios of Zimbabwe, and the staff and students of the Makarios III Orthodox Seminary at Riruta, Kenya, for their hospitality and their readiness to help me get the information I needed. To the Pokrov Foundation in Bulgaria, for their hospitality and help, and to the Monastery of St John the Forerunner in Karea, Athens, and many others in that city who helped me with my research in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS of PROSPECTIVE SPEAKERS for the THIRD SCIENTIFIC WORKSHOP of the MOUNT ATHOS CENTER Contents
    * MOUNT ATHOS CENTER ABSTRACTS OF PROSPECTIVE SPEAKERS FOR THE THIRD SCIENTIFIC WORKSHOP OF THE MOUNT ATHOS CENTER Contents ANNOUNCEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 3 Vladimir Božinović ................................................................................................................. 4 Dr Nina Chichinadze .............................................................................................................. 5 Dr Helen M.Dixon .................................................................................................................. 6 Ekaterina Dughashvili ............................................................................................................ 8 Dr Dejan Dželebdžić ............................................................................................................. 10 Srđan Pirivatrić .................................................................................................................... 11 Manuela Studer-Karlen ........................................................................................................ 12 Alex Rodriguez Suarez ......................................................................................................... 13 Mirjana Živojinović .............................................................................................................. 14 Paschalis Androudis ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Critiques of Monasticism in the Twelfth Century
    A “Truly Unmonastic Way of Life”: Byzantine Critiques of Monasticism in the Twelfth Century DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hannah Elizabeth Ewing Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Professor Timothy Gregory, Advisor Professor Anthony Kaldellis Professor Alison I. Beach Copyright by Hannah Elizabeth Ewing 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines twelfth-century Byzantine writings on monasticism and holy men to illuminate monastic critiques during this period. Drawing upon close readings of texts from a range of twelfth-century voices, it processes both highly biased literary evidence and the limited documentary evidence from the period. In contextualizing the complaints about monks and reforms suggested for monasticism, as found in the writings of the intellectual and administrative elites of the empire, both secular and ecclesiastical, this study shows how monasticism did not fit so well in the world of twelfth-century Byzantium as it did with that of the preceding centuries. This was largely on account of developments in the role and operation of the church and the rise of alternative cultural models that were more critical of traditional ascetic sanctity. This project demonstrates the extent to which twelfth-century Byzantine society and culture had changed since the monastic heyday of the tenth century and contributes toward a deeper understanding of Byzantine monasticism in an under-researched period of the institution. ii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my family, and most especially to my parents. iii Acknowledgments This dissertation is indebted to the assistance, advice, and support given by Anthony Kaldellis, Tim Gregory, and Alison Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM PHILOTHEOU to KARYES and KOUTLOUMOUSIOU
    FOOTPATHS OF THE HOLY MOUNTAIN FROM PHILOTHEOU TO KARYES and KOUTLOUMOUSIOU Distance: 9.7 km Journey Time: 3½ hours © The Friends of Mount Athos, 2007 – 2021. All rights reserved. – Version 1.7.1 This route mostly follows the contours of the mountain, although there are one or two steep places. While the initial and final sections are mainly along traditional kalderimi paved stone paths, a long middle section follows a road. But there are fine views from the road down to Iviron and along the adjacent coast. In one section the footpath requires a difficult crossing of a stream, so an alternative route by road to avoid it is also described. Note: All distances given (in metres) should be taken as approximate. The numbers shown in the form 1 are Waypoints to be found in associated GPS tracking. The route described is liable to unpredictable change: for example, forestry work, road or track construction and plant growth may alter the route, or its appearance. Signposts may disappear or new ones appear. The Friends of Mount Athos strives to keep this description correct and up to date but cannot take responsibility for its accuracy. Abbreviations: L = Left; R = Right; KSO = Keep straight on; FP = Footpath; K = Kalderimi (stone-paved FP or track) Transliterations: ΚΑΡΥΕΣ = Karyes; ΚΟΥΤΛΟΥΜΟΥΣΙΟΥ = Koutloumousiou; ΙΒΗΡΩΝ = Iviron; ΦΙΛΟΘΕΟΥ = Philotheou; ΚΑΡΑΚΑΛΟΥ = Karakalou ; ΞΗΡΟΠΟΤΑΜΟΥ = Xeropotamou ; ΣΙΜΩΝΟΣ ΠΕΤΡΑΣ = Simonos Petras; ΤΙΜΙΟΣ ΠΡΟΔΡΟΜΟΣ = Timios Prodromos Description of Route: Walk (m) And then . 1 Turn L out of Philotheou Monastery entrance, with Monastery wall on L. At the end of the wall, bear L on K, passing between buildings ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • LITURGICAL ILLUSTRATIONS in the BYZANTINE LECTIONARY COD.587 in the DIONYSIOU MONASTERY, MOUNT ATHOS Tomoyuki MASUDA
    LITURGICAL ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE BYZANTINE LECTIONARY COD.587 IN THE DIONYSIOU MONASTERY, MOUNT ATHOS Tomoyuki MASUDA* The Dionysiou Lectionary (Cod.587 in the Dionysiou Monastery on Mount Athos) possesses not only the largest illustrations among the seventeen manuscripts with th~ narrative cycle of Christ's life, but also the greatest variety of pictorial forms according to the importance of the texts and feasts. To grasp the characteristics of its iconographic program, I discuss on the illustrations for Holy Week. The miniature depicting Christ s Prayer at Gethsemane is placed at the top of the Twelve Evangelia for the Passion of Holy Thursday. Why is Christ depicted three times in different motions? Why the miniature of the Conference of the Chief Priests before Caiaphas for the Liturgy of Holy Thursday has the same composition as the Conference of the Chief Priests before Pilate for the Orthros of Holy Saturday? Why the Betrayal of Judas is selected for the Holy Friday Liturgy? To solve these questions, we have to interpret whole texts of the church services for the Passion and surviving illustrated lectionaries. Our painter depicted the Prayer at Gethsemane in the composition of Moses Receiving the Law to emphasize Christ as New Moses and to visualize the typological correspondence between the Old and the New Testament. The Conference of the Chief Priests, an insignificant episode at a glance, is regarded as the important event which connects the Gospel typologically with the Psalter in the context of the liturgy. To emphasize the point visually, the Dionysiou Lectionary selected the Conference of the Chief Priests with the same composition as the Psalter illustrations of the conference of the kings, in spite of the Gethsemane scene originally suitable for the place.
    [Show full text]
  • Achilles Paten of Pausilypos 27 Acta of the Monasteries of Mount Athos
    Index Achilles Paten of Pausilypos 27 Armenēs Iōannēs, head of the hat makers’ guild (πρῶτος τῶν καμαλαυκάδων) 57 acta of the monasteries of Mount Athos 12 Armenopoulos Konstantinos 20. 49. 59. 65. 66. 69. 82 Acts of the Apostles 15 – Procheiron Nomōn 20. 49. 59. 65. 66. 69 ad sanctos, burials 19 armour 36. 57 Adoniyah, Jewish scribe in Thessaloniki 82 armour, gladiatorial 29 Aegean Sea 15. 41 arrowheads, for bows 49 aer (ἀὴρ) 80 arrows 49 aer-epitaphios 80. 81 Artemōn (Αρτέμων), zygopoios (ζυγοποιὸς) 38 Africa, sub-Saharan 67 artisans, in Byzantine society 89. 90 Aineia 16 – in Roman society 89 – their social status 89 al secco, technique 37 Asēmomylos, probably corresponding to the Tzechlianē or Ropalaia Alexandria, Egypt 15. 38 site 196 Alexios I Komnenos, Emperor 90 Asia Minor 15. 29. 30. 61 altars, Roman 30 Asterios 89 ammoplytai (ἀμμοπλύται) 72 Astrapas, Eutychios and Michaēl 78. 81 Andrew, Apostle 51 Astrapas Iōannēs, copyist 82 Andriskos, King of Macedon 17 Asvestochōrē 19 Andronikos II Palaeologos 81 Athens 65. 144 Andronikos III, Emperor 61 Athos, Mount 12. 45. 52. 57. 63. 64. 72. 77. 78. 79. 82 Andronikos Palaeologos, Despot 79 Attica 30 angastaria 72 Avar 15 Apokaukos Iōannēs, Bishop of Naupaktos 74 Axios, river 15. 46 apothecaries or perfumaries 81 bakeries 65 aqueducts 18 bakers 65 Arab 41. 53. 70. 72 bakery, mangipeion 65 arbalest (τζάγκρα or βαλλιστρίς) 50 Baldwin Count 53 Archaeological Museum of Ancient (Roman) Forum, Thessaloniki 38 Balkans 15. 33. 41. 43. 61. 68. 73. 75. 78. 79. 91 – barbaric invasions in the Balkans 18 Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Friends of Mount Athos Annual Report 2018 1 FRIENDS OF MOUNT ATHOS ROYAL PATRON HRH The Prince of Wales PRESIDENT Metropolitan Kallistos of Diokleia PATRONS Mr Costa Carras The Rt Revd and Rt Hon Lord Chartres, KCVO, PC, DD, FSA Archbishop Elisey of The Hague and The Netherlands Professor René Gothóni Archbishop Gregorios of Thyateira and Great Britain Dr Vladeta Jankovic Professor Elizabeth Jeffreys, FAHA Sir Michael Llewellyn-Smith, KCVO, CMG The Revd Professor Andrew Louth, FBA, FSA Metropolitan Jonah Paffhausen The Most Revd and Rt Hon Lord Williams of Oystermouth, PC, DD, FBA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Dr Dimitri Conomos The Revd Douglas Dales Dr Nicholas Fennell Mr Simon Jennings, FCA (Hon. Treasurer) Metropolitan Kallistos of Diokleia Mr F. W. Peter Lea, FCA (Hon. Secretary) Dr Christopher Solomon Dr Graham Speake, FSA (Chairman) MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY FOR THE AMERICAS Professor Robert W. Allison HONORARY MEMBER HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh This Annual Report is edited by the Chairman, Dr Graham Speake, Ironstone Farmhouse, Milton, Banbury OX15 4HH. It is private and not for publication. The contributions remain the copyright of the authors and may not be reproduced without their permission. They represent the opinions of their authors which are not necessarily shared by the society. Printed in Great Britain by The Mullet Press, Milton, Banbury 2 CONTENTS The Society’s Year: 2018 By Graham Speake The Mount Athos Foundation of America By Robert W. Allison Report from the Mountain: 2018 Writing about Byzantine Christianity By Averil
    [Show full text]