DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Child Neglect and Abandonment Laws (Last Updated September 2014)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criminal Child Neglect and Abandonment Laws (Last Updated September 2014) Criminal Child Neglect and Abandonment Laws (Last updated September 2014) This compilation includes all criminal statutes which apply in instances where a parent, guardian, or caretaker fails to provide for a child’s basic needs, generally: food, shelter, clothing, educational needs, and medical needs. This does not include drug endangered children, failure to protect, or failure to pay court-ordered child support. This compilation is up-to-date as of September, 2014, but we recommend checking case law and current legislation for any possible modifications. For further assistance, consult the National District Attorneys Association’s National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse at 703-549-9222 or via the free online prosecution assistance service http://www.ndaa.org/ta_form.php. National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse National District Attorneys Association 1 Table of Contents Click on the state heading to go to the statutes section. Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 8 ALA. CODE § 12-15-102 (2014). Definitions. ............................................................................. 8 ALA. CODE § 13A-13-4 (2014). Nonsupport. ............................................................................ 12 ALA. CODE § 13A-13-5 (2014). Abandonment of child. ........................................................... 12 ALA. CODE § 13A-13-6 (2014). Endangering welfare of child. ................................................ 12 Alaska ............................................................................................................................................ 13 ALASKA STAT. § 11.51.100 (2014). Endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree ..... 13 ALASKA STAT. § 11.51.120 (2014). Criminal nonsupport ........................................................ 14 Arizona .......................................................................................................................................... 15 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-3612 (2014). Definitions; contributing to dependency or delinquency ............................................................................................................................... 15 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-3613 (2014). Contributing to delinquency and dependency; classification; procedure ............................................................................................................ 16 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-3619 (2014). Permitting life, health or morals of minor to be imperiled by neglect, abuse or immoral associations; classification ......................................... 16 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-3623 (2014). Child or vulnerable adult abuse; emotional abuse; classification; exceptions; definitions ........................................................................................ 17 Arkansas ........................................................................................................................................ 18 ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-26-401 (2014). Nonsupport .................................................................... 18 ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-27-222 (2014). Gross neglect of parental duty resulting in delinquency 20 California ....................................................................................................................................... 20 CAL. PENAL CODE § 270 (2014). Failure to provide; parent; punishment; effect of custody; evidence; applicability of section; artificial insemination; treatment by spiritual means .......... 20 CAL. PENAL CODE § 270.1 (2014). Parent or guardian of chronic truant; failure to reasonably supervise and encourage school attendance deemed misdemeanor; punishment; deferred entry of judgment program; funding; punishment under other provisions; declaration of eligibility or ineligibility for program ............................................................................................................ 21 CAL. PENAL CODE § 270.5 (2014). Duty to accept minor into parent’s home or provide alternative shelter; request of child protection agency; lawful excuse ...................................... 22 CAL. PENAL CODE § 271 (2014). Desertion of child under 14 with intent to abandon; punishment ................................................................................................................................ 23 CAL. PENAL CODE § 271a (2014). Abandonment or failure to maintain child under 14; false representation that child is orphan; punishment ........................................................................ 23 CAL. PENAL CODE § 272 (2014). Contributing to delinquency of persons under 18 years; persuading, luring, or transporting minors 12 years of age or younger ..................................... 23 CAL. WELF. & INST. CODE § 300 (2014). Children subject to jurisdiction; legislative intent and declarations “guardian” defined ................................................................................................ 24 Colorado ........................................................................................................................................ 27 COLO. REV. STAT. § 18-6-401 (2014). Child abuse .................................................................. 27 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 30 CONN. GEN STAT. § 53-20 (2014). Cruelty to persons .............................................................. 30 CONN. GEN STAT. § 53-23 (2014). Abandonment of child under the age of six years ............. 30 Delaware ........................................................................................................................................ 30 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 10 § 901 (2014). Definitions .................................................................... 30 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1100 (2014). Definitions relating to children ................................... 35 National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse National District Attorneys Association 2 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1101 (2014). Abandonment of child; class E felony; class F felony 36 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1102 (2014). Endangering the welfare of a child; class E or G felony ................................................................................................................................................... 37 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1103 (2014). Child abuse in the third degree; class A misdemeanor38 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1103B (2014). Child abuse in the first degree; class B felony ........ 38 DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11 § 1107 (2014). Endangering children; unclassified misdemeanor ...... 38 District of Columbia ...................................................................................................................... 39 D.C. CODE § 22-1101 (2014). Definition and Penalty. ............................................................. 39 D.C. CODE § 22-1102 (2014). Refusal or neglect of guardian to provide for child under 14 years of age. ............................................................................................................................... 39 Florida ........................................................................................................................................... 39 FLA. STAT. ANN. § 827.03 (2014). Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties 39 FLA. STAT. ANN. § 827.10 (2014). Unlawful desertion of a child ............................................ 41 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 42 GA. CODE ANN. § 16-5-70 (2014). Cruelty to children ............................................................. 42 GA. CODE ANN. § 16-5-72 (2014). Reckless abandonment of a child ...................................... 42 Hawaii ........................................................................................................................................... 43 HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 709-902 (2014). Abandonment of a child ........................................ 43 HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 709-903 (2014). Persistent nonsupport ............................................ 43 Idaho .............................................................................................................................................. 43 IDAHO CODE ANN. § 18-401 (2014). Desertion and nonsupport of children or spouse ............ 43 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................ 44 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/12C-10 (2014). Child Abandonment .................................................. 44 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/12C-25 (2014). Contributing to dependency or neglect of a minor .. 45 Indiana ........................................................................................................................................... 45 IND. CODE ANN. § 35-46-1-4 (2014). Neglect of a dependent; child selling ............................. 46 IND. CODE ANN. § 35-46-1-5 (2014). Nonsupport of a dependent child ................................... 47 Iowa ............................................................................................................................................... 47 IOWA CODE 726.3 (2014). Neglect or abandonment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    State Definitions Of Child Abuse and Neglect ORC 2151.031 Abused child defined As used in this chapter, an “abused child” includes any child who: (A) Is the victim of “sexual activity” as defined under Chapter 2907. of the Revised Code, where such activity would constitute an offense under that chapter, except that the court need not find that any person has been convicted of the offense in order to find that the child is an abused child; (B) Is endangered as defined in section 2919.22 of the Revised Code, except that the court need not find that any person has been convicted under that section in order to find that the child is an abused child; (C) Exhibits evidence of any physical or mental injury or death, inflicted other than by accidental means, or an injury or death which is at variance with the history given of it. Except as provided in division (D) of this section, a child exhibiting evidence of corporal punishment or other physical disciplinary measure by a parent, guardian, custodian, person having custody or control, or person in loco parentis of a child is not an abused child under this division if the measure is not prohibited under section 2919.22 of the Revised Code. (D) Because of the acts of his parents, guardian, or custodian, suffers physical or mental injury that harms or threatens to harm the child’s health or welfare. (E) Is subjected to out-of-home care child abuse. ORC 2151.03 Neglected child defined - failure to provide medical or surgical care for religious reasons (A) As used in this chapter, “neglected child”
    [Show full text]
  • Charging Language
    1. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abduction ................................................................................................73 By Relative.........................................................................................415-420 See Kidnapping Abuse, Animal ...............................................................................................358-362,365-368 Abuse, Child ................................................................................................74-77 Abuse, Vulnerable Adult ...............................................................................78,79 Accessory After The Fact ..............................................................................38 Adultery ................................................................................................357 Aircraft Explosive............................................................................................455 Alcohol AWOL Machine.................................................................................19,20 Retail/Retail Dealer ............................................................................14-18 Tax ................................................................................................20-21 Intoxicated – Endanger ......................................................................19 Disturbance .......................................................................................19 Drinking – Prohibited Places .............................................................17-20 Minors – Citation Only
    [Show full text]
  • Euro-Nmd Patient Representatives Booklet
    EURO-NMD PATIENT REPRESENTATIVES BOOKLET JUNE 2020 EURO-NMD Patient Representatives – 11/06/2020 1 EURO-NMD Meeting, Freiburg, 29-30 November 2017 INTRODUCTION The Patient Advisory Board (PAB) aims to ensure true and equitable representation of the voice of patients within the EURO-NMD network so that EURO-NMD services can answer to the needs and expectations of rare neuromuscular disease patients and improve access to high quality diagnosis, care and treatment. The PAB creates a bridGe between the ERN and the rare neuromuscular patient community, by coordinatinG the participation of all patient representatives in the Network, and liaisinG with its affiliated patient orGanisations. The Patient Advisory Board also endorses additional patient representatives to join Specialist Groups based on their expertise. The PAB has established its own Constitution and Rules of Procedure. Membership: Members of the PAB include those elected via EURORDIS who constitute the European Patient Advocacy Group for EURO-NMD. Members from umbrella orGanisations (e.g. Spierziekten Nederland) have also been invited to join the Patients Advisory Board to ensure a proper representation of the neuromuscular patient community amonG the PAB. ePAG representatives: ‹ François Lamy (AFM-Téléthon, France), ‹ Dimitrios Athanasiou (MDA-Hellas), ‹ Massimo Marra and Patrizia Garzena (alternate) (CIDP Italia ONLUS), ‹ Marisol Montolio (Duchenne Parent Project Spain), ‹ Michela Onali (Gli Equilibristi HIBM, Italy) ‹ Jean-Philippe Plançon (French Association against Peripheral Neuropathies, France - European Patient OrGanisation for Dysimmune and Inflammatory Neuropathies, EU), ‹ Evy Reviers (ALS LiGa Belgium), ‹ Judit Varadine Csapo (Angyalszarnyak HunGarian Muscle Dystrophy Association). Other NMD patient representatives: ‹ Madelon Kroneman (Spierziekten Nederland, Dutch Patient Society of Neuromuscular Diseases), The members of the PAB will commit to assist in the following: ‹ Governance of the ERN: The ERN Board will include the patient representatives that are part of the Patient Advisory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor
    Santa Clara Journal of International Law Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 1 1-12-2020 Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Jaya Reddy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Jaya Reddy, Comment, Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor, 18 SANTA CLARA J. INT'L L. 92 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol18/iss1/1 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 18 SANTA CLARA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 92 (2020) Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Jaya Reddy !92 Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Table of Contents I. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................94 II. Background ..............................................................................................................................94 A. 2002: Legalization of Commercial Surrogacy Caused Exploitation but Allowed Impoverished Women to Escape Poverty ............................................................................................................94 B. 2005: Indian Council for Medical Research Issued Extremely Narrow Guidelines Regulating “ART” ............................................................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Child Abuse Packet for KIDS
    Child Abuse Signs & Symptoms; Attitudes & Actions What is Child Abuse? Child abuse, or child maltreatment, is an act by a parent or caretaker that results in or allows the child to be subjected to death, physical injury, sexual assault, or emotional harm. Emotional abuse, neglect, physical abuse, and sexual abuse are all different forms of child abuse. Child abuse is more than bruises and broken bones. While physical abuse might be the most visible, other types of abuse, such as emotional abuse and neglect, also leave deep, lasting scars. The earlier abused children get help, the greater chance they have to heal and break the cycle—rather than perpetuating it. By learning about common signs of abuse and what you can do to intervene, you can make a huge difference in a child’s life. Types of Child Abuse There are several types of child abuse, but the core element that ties them together is the emotional effect on the child. Children need predictability, structure, clear boundaries, and the knowledge that their parents are looking out for their safety. Abused children cannot predict how their parents will act. Their world is an unpredictable, frightening place with no rules. Whether the abuse is a slap, a harsh comment, stony silence, or not knowing if there will be dinner on the table tonight, the end result is a child that feels unsafe, uncared for, and alone. Emotional child abuse Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me? Contrary to this old saying, emotional abuse can severely damage a child’s mental health or social development, leaving lifelong psychological scars.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROSE of ZHU ZIQING by IAIN WILLIAM CROFTS B.A., The
    THE PROSE OF ZHU ZIQING by IAIN WILLIAM CROFTS B.A., The University of Leeds, 1980 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May 1984 (© Iain William Crofts, 1984 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of W tSTJiplZS The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date £1 MllSf /W ABSTRACT Zhu Ziqing was a Chinese academic who developed a reputation first as a poet and later as an essayist in the 1920's and 1930's. His works are still read widely in China and are considered important enough to be included in the curriculum of secondary schools and universities in the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Despite his enduring reputation among his countrymen, he is little known abroad and Western scholarly works on modern Chinese literature scarcely mention him. This thesis examines Zhu Ziqing's prose, since it is his essays which are the basis of his reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Narcissistic Presentation in Abused and Non- Abused Children and Adolescents
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Summer 8-2014 Differences in Narcissistic Presentation in Abused and Non- Abused Children and Adolescents Mallory Laine Malkin University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Child Psychology Commons, Clinical Psychology Commons, School Psychology Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Malkin, Mallory Laine, "Differences in Narcissistic Presentation in Abused and Non-Abused Children and Adolescents" (2014). Dissertations. 274. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/274 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi DIFFERENCES IN NARCISSISTIC PRESENTATION IN ABUSED AND NON-ABUSED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS by Mallory Laine Malkin Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2014 ABSTRACT DIFFERENCES IN NARCISSISTIC PRESENTATION IN ABUSED AND NON-ABUSED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS by Mallory Laine Malkin August 2014 The present study examined whether children and adolescents who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse report higher levels of narcissistic tendencies than children and adolescents who have not been victims of abuse. Inaddition to narcissism, internalizing symptoms, externalizing behaviors, and risky behaviors were evaluated, as such issues have been associated with both maltreatment (Baer & Maschi, 2003) and narcissism (Barry & Malkin, 2010; Bushman & Baumeister, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan As an Immediate Relative, to Determine Whether a Child Who Has Been Or Will Be Adopted by a U.S
    Instructions for Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative USCIS Form I-600 Department of Homeland Security OMB No. 1615-0028 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Expires 12/31/2021 What Is the Purpose of Form I-600? U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) uses the information provided on Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative, to determine whether a child who has been or will be adopted by a U.S. citizen (and spouse, if married) can be classified as an orphan for an immediate relative immigrant visa. Who May File Form I-600? If you are a U.S. citizen, you (and your spouse, if married) may file Form I-600 for an unmarried child if: 1. You file the Form I-600 before the child’s 16th birthday (or before the child’s 18th birthday in some cases, as discussed in these Instructions); 2. The child’s adoption is not governed by the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention); 3. The child qualifies as an orphan, as defined in the Immigration and NationalityAct (INA) section 101(b)(1)(F); and 4. You (and your spouse, if married) either: A. Have adopted the child outside the United States and the adoption order is final; or B. Have obtained legal custody of the child for emigration and adoption in the United States and will adopt the child in the United States after the child enters the country with a visa. To qualify as an adoption for immigration purposes, the adoption must, according to the laws where it takes place, establish a permanent legal parent-child relationship between the child and you (and your spouse, if married), as well as terminate the legal parent-child relationship between the child and any former parent(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code Offenses by Punishment Range Office of the Attorney General 2
    PENAL CODE BYOFFENSES PUNISHMENT RANGE Including Updates From the 85th Legislative Session REV 3/18 Table of Contents PUNISHMENT BY OFFENSE CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................... 2 PENALTIES FOR REPEAT AND HABITUAL OFFENDERS .......................................................... 4 EXCEPTIONAL SENTENCES ................................................................................................... 7 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 4 ................................................................................................. 8 INCHOATE OFFENSES ........................................................................................................... 8 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 5 ............................................................................................... 11 OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON ....................................................................................... 11 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 6 ............................................................................................... 18 OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY ......................................................................................... 18 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 7 ............................................................................................... 20 OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY .......................................................................................... 20 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 8 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Servants and Private Fiduciaries
    PUBLIC SERVANTS AND PRIVATE FIDUCIARIES PARENTS: TRUSTED BUT NOT TRUSTEES OR (FOSTER) PARENTS AS FIDUCIARIES MARGARET F. BRINIG∗ In April of 2010, the mass media was full of accounts of a seven-year-old Russian boy, Artyom (whose adoptive name is Justin), who had been returned to Moscow on his own by an American adoptive mother who felt unable to care for him. The mother, Torry Hansen, alleged that her family was afraid of the boy, specifically because he had threatened to burn their house down around them and had drawn pictures of it in flames.1 She paid for someone to meet the child once he landed and had her mother deliver him to the gate before his ten hour flight.2 While there could be many reasons for disquiet on hearing the story – not the least of which was putting that young a child onto a lengthy international flight unescorted – this Conference suggests that we pay attention to our feelings that Ms. Hansen at least attempted to do something that parents cannot: to give back a child.3 ∗ Fritz Duda Family Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School. 1 See, e.g., Clifford J. Levy, Adopted Boy, 7, Is Sent Back, Outraging Russia, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 10, 2010, at A1. 2 Id. The incident sparked great outrage in Russia, which temporarily suspended all U.S. adoptions. Id. They were apparently not halted, however. Clifford J. Levy, Adoptions From Russia Continue, Official Says, N.Y. TIMES, May 6, 2010, at A6. 3 As an article in the New York Times put it, “We do not know all the details.
    [Show full text]