Aelian 97, 158, 160–162 Ahuramazda/Oromazdes 32, 66N.92, 103

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aelian 97, 158, 160–162 Ahuramazda/Oromazdes 32, 66N.92, 103 INDEX Aelian 97, 158, 160–162 Amazons 167 Ahuramazda/Oromazdes 32, 66n.92, 103, ancestral custom 7, 9–11, 34 106–109, 113, 115, 119, 142, 146, 174 Artabanus (Parthian king) 183 see also Darius I’s inscriptions Artaxerxes (Sasanian king) 183 Alexander Bessus’ throne-name 92 accounts conflated with Darius III Darius III’s son 48 1, 5–6, 158–162, 166, 174–175, Artaxerxes II (Achaemenid king) 25, 115, 177–180 132, 180 historians Artaxerxes III/Ochus (Achaemenid) 14, Aristobulus 2, 23, 24, 94, 110, 113, 36, 37, 40, 43–44, 92, 115 113n.58, 148 Arthurian Romances 40 Arrian artistic representations sources of date 2 narration 19, 29, 83–84 sources of 2–3, 24 Athenaeus Cleitarchus on Darius I’s inscription 67 date 4 Avesta 66, 126, 173, 175, 178 Curtius date 4 Babylon 2, 9–10, 42, 57n.34, 147, 150–151, description of Persia 53n.13 158, 160, 181 Diodorus of Sicily Bactra/Bactria 46, 75, 77–79, 81–82, date 2 85n.83, 91, 93, 94, 95, 95n. 27, 98, 108, on Alexander’s forgery 43 111, 117 Persepolis’ description 69–70 bandakā 100–101, 103 sacred fire 131 Baryaxes (Median pretender) 95n.27, 111 sources of 4 see also Bessus Eratosthenes 3, 102 Bessus 46, 47, 72, 74–83, 85, 89–99, 101, Justin 108, 111, 117–118, 121 date 3 Artaxerxes his throne-name 92 sources of 3 conflated with Baryaxes 95n.27, 111 Nearchus 3 executed at Ecbatuna as a rebel Onesicritus 94–97, 117–118 on Darius I’s tomb inscription his threat significant 97, 117–118 119, 162 boar 125–126 Plutarch see also Verethragna and Zoroastrian date 4 influences Pompeius Trogus Book of Esther 37–38, 141n.14 date 3 sources of 3–4 ‘control of anger’ qualification of kingship Ptolemy 23, 24, 29, 52, 152, 156, 158, 66n.92, 67, 78, 136n.108 161, 165 Ctesias 183 date 2 Cyrus 2, 32, 39–40, 50, 59, 70, 72, 110–114, in Iranian king list 166, 174, 179, 183 132–133, 183 ‘king of Persians’ 101, 103, 127 Cyrus the Younger 40n.181, 63, 126, 180 name 21n.77, 24, 35, 55n.27, 59, 85–86, 112 Dārāe/Dārāy (Darius in Pahlavi & Persian) Persian costume 99–104 173, 179 ‘satrap of Darius’ 101 Darius I 5, 45, 47, 60, 63, 66–68, 91, 94, Alexander Romance 5, 124, 180–182 95, 100, 103, 105–109, 111–119, 127, 133, 192 index 139, 140–142, 145–146, 155, 157, 174, 179, King’s chariot 18, 79, 83–85 180–182 see also artistic representations inscriptions 5, 63, 66, 67, 103, 105–109, king’s tent 17, 79, 83–84, 128, 169–171 113–117, 119, 127, 136n.108, 139–142, 145–146, 174, 181 law 103, 107–108, 118–119, 140–142 tomb 132–133, 141, 155, 157 Ahuramazda’s 119, 142 Darius III/Dareius 1, 4, 6–11, 13–23, 25–26, Darius I’s 103, 119, 140–141 30–36, 39, 41–48, 56–58, 60, 65–67, Philip’s 140 70–81, 92, 94, 106–108, 113, 118, 132, 147, Livy 15 149, 156, 167, 174, 179, 183 acclaims Alexander heir 30–35, 71, 73, Magi 2, 17, 19–20, 67, 110, 124, 137, 144, 74, 97 147n.6, 173, 177n.1–2 bravery 14 Mardi 61 eye on future’s verdict 77 Marsyas 4 folkloric accounts 87–89 minstrels 5, 87, 108, 116, 181 humanity 92 supported by king 116, 181 letters to Alexander 42–48, 50 speeches before battles 17, 26, 77, 149 Naqsh-i Rustam 49, 88, 154–157 strategy for last stand 65–66, 71, 75, Nezami 124–125 77, 86, 87 Nizam ul-Mulk 180 Dio Chrysostom 182 drinking problem Osthanes 177–179 Alexander 65, 67, 68 Olympias (Alexander’s mother) 28, 158, Cambysis 68 161, 163–168 Philip 66 conflated with Darius III’s mother Dynastic prophecy 88, 156 166–168 Ecbatana/Hagmathana 46, 74, 77, 94, 97, Parthian 65, 72, 77, 178, 183 117–118, 131, 136n.108 histories 183 earth & water 47 Persepolis 49, 51, 56, 58–66, 68, 70, evidence of translations from Iranian 1, 76–77, 113, 117, 144, 155, 163 95, 101–102, 106, 109, 113, 137 Alexander’s object 46 Exathres/Oxathres (Darius III’s brother) capital of Persian empire 61, 64, 66, 36, 74, 97 69–70 defence of 51–56 fortune 19, 26, 32, 45, 48, 52, 57, 61, description 69–70 78–80, 82, 98, 131, 158, 180 sack of 64–68, 77 Thais story propaganda against girdle 99–101, 104 Alexander 64–65, 68, 70 goddess 25, 38, 40, 127–130, 132n.82, Persia 55, 58, 60–62, 144, 163 147–149 attempts to capture brings ‘hell’ 55 Anahita 128–129 see also Zoroastrian influences Ishtar 167 description 53n.13 Persian court’s roster 19 Hephaestion 21–25, 36, 38, 125, 131–135, Persian empire as collection of languages, 136, 136n.108, 147, 159 climates & landscapes 117, 141 Herodotus 12–13, 19n.72, 47, 114–117, 131, see also Darius I’s inscriptions 143, 183 Persian funerary rites 33, 71–72, 121–122, 131–137, 150, 160–161 Iranian/Persian audience 1, 8, 13, 22, 30, Persian histories 182–183 49, 57, 69, 84–85, 99, 106–107, 182 Persian document on the army 18 Philip (Alexander’s father) 11, 43, 66, 101, Josephus 67n.93, 182 121, 125, 140, 145, 156–158, 164.
Recommended publications
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop
    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop N THE ANABASIS, Xenophon asserts that the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger was falsely accused of plotting a coup I d’état against King Artaxerxes II shortly after his accession to the throne in 404 BCE. Spared from execution by the Queen Mother Parysatis, Cyrus returned to Lydia determined to seize the throne for himself. He secretly prepared his rebellion by securing access to thousands of Greek hoplites, winning over Persian officials and most of the Greek cities of Ionia, and continuing to send tribute and assurances of his loyalty to the unsuspecting King (1.1).1 In Xenophon’s timeline, the rebellion was not official until sometime between the muster of his army at Sardis in spring 401, which spurred his rival Tissaphernes to warn Artaxerxes (1.2.4–5), and his arrival several months later at Thapsacus on the Euphrates, where Cyrus first openly an- nounced his true intentions (1.4.11). Questioning the “strange blindness” of Artaxerxes in light of Cyrus’ seemingly obvious preparations for revolt, Pierre Briant proposed an alternative timeline placing the outbreak of the rebellion almost immediately after Cyrus’ return to Sardis in late 404 or early 403.2 In his reconstruction, the King allowed Cyrus 1 See also Ctesias FGrHist 688 F 16.59, Diod. 14.19, Plut. Artax. 3–4. 2 Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander (Winona Lake 2002) 617–620. J. K. Anderson, Xenophon (New York 1974) 80, expresses a similar skepticism. Briant concludes his discussion by stating that the rebellion officially (Briant does not define “official,” but I take it to mean when either the King or Cyrus declared it publicly) began in 401 with the muster of Cyrus’ army at Sardis, but it is nonetheless appropriate to characterize Briant’s position as dating the official outbreak of the revolt to 404/3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings & Events of the Babylonian, Persian and Greek Dynasties
    KINGS AND EVENTS OF THE BABYLONIAN, PERSIAN, AND GREEK DYNASTIES 612 B.C. Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar) 608 Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule Josiah’s reforms dissipate 605 Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile 605 - 538 Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon 586 Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation 582 Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR 562 - 560 Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody 560 - 556 Neriglissar 556 Labaski-Marduk reigned 556 - 539 Nabonidus: Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk. Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar Belshazzar: Spent most of his time trying to restore order. Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire*
    ACTA CIASSICA LI (2008) 1-20 ISSN 0065-1141 ARTICLES • ARTIKELS TRACES OF CYNIC MONOTHEISM IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE* P.R. Bosman Univel sity of South Africa ABSTRACT The ancient Cynics rejected traditional religion, themselves on first appearances endorsing either atheism or agnosticism. But their criticism may also have stemmed from a radical monotheism as voiced by Antisthenes. After briefly discussing imperial Cynics and their views on religion, the article argues that the 4th letter of Pseudo-Heraclitus and the Geneva Papyrus inv. 271, Cynic texts from the Early Empire, are not contrary to the essentials of the philosophy and may represent late Hellenistic forms of the Antisthenic tradition in portraying Cynic-type sages mediating between humankind and the God of nature. Introduction Cynic philosophy's roots go back to the 4th century BC, but it experienced a revival approximately simultaneous with the dramatic rise of Christianity. The two movements had much in common, not least their shared criticism of traditional Greco-Roman religion. 1 Two fundamental forces driving early Christian rejection of popular religion were belief in the one God of Judaism and a close association of his will with the rules for righteous living. It may be asked whether anything similar can be found in the Cynicism of that era. Some sources indeed suggest that the Cynics - traditionally focussing exclusively on ethics - were prepared to link their way of life to belief in a single God who provides or communicates the principles of correct conduct to the Cynic sage.2 * I wish to thank the referees of Acta Classica for valuable comments and corrections to this text.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Melammu Project
    THE MELAMMU PROJECT http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/ “The Naked Ascetics of India and Other Eastern Religions in the Greek and Roman Sources of the Late Classical Antiquity” KLAUS KARTTUNEN Published in Melammu Symposia 3: A. Panaino and G. Pettinato (eds.), Ideologies as Intercultural Phenomena. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium of the Assyrian and Babylonian Intellectual Heritage Project. Held in Chicago, USA, October 27-31, 2000 (Milan: Università di Bologna & IsIao 2002), pp. 135-42. Publisher: http://www.mimesisedizioni.it/ This article was downloaded from the website of the Melammu Project: http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/ The Melammu Project investigates the continuity, transformation and diffusion of Mesopotamian culture throughout the ancient world. A central objective of the project is to create an electronic database collecting the relevant textual, art-historical, archaeological, ethnographic and linguistic evidence, which is available on the website, alongside bibliographies of relevant themes. In addition, the project organizes symposia focusing on different aspects of cultural continuity and evolution in the ancient world. The Digital Library available at the website of the Melammu Project contains articles from the Melammu Symposia volumes, as well as related essays. All downloads at this website are freely available for personal, non-commercial use. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. For inquiries, please contact [email protected]. KARTTUNEN T HE NAKED ASCETICS OF INDIA KLAUS KARTTUNEN Helsinki The Naked Ascetics of India and Other Eastern Religions in the Greek and Roman Sources of the Late Classical Antiquity * peculiar outcome of Alexander’s the Seleucid envoy to the Indian Maurya Indian campaigns was the per- empire, gave his own view of the Gym- Asistent fame of India as the land nosophistai and described several kinds of wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Achaemenid Legacy in the Arsakid Period
    Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 2019, special issue, pp. 175–186 Volume in Honour of Professor Anna Krasnowolska doi:10.4467/20843933ST.19.032.10975 www.ejournals.eu/Studia-Litteraria HTTP://ORCID.ORG/0000-0001-6709-752X MAREK JAN OLBRYCHT University of Rzeszów, Poland e-mail: [email protected] The Memory of the Past: the Achaemenid Legacy in the Arsakid Period Abstract The Achaemenid Empire, established by Cyrus the Great, provided a model looked up to by subsequent empires on the territory of Iran and the Middle East, including the empires ruled by Alexander of Macedonia, the Seleukids, and the Arsakids. Achaemenid patterns were eagerly imitated by minor rulers of Western Asia, including Media Atropatene, Armenia, Pontos, Kappadokia and Kommagene. The Arsakids harked back to Achaemenids, but their claims to the Achaemenid descendance were sporadic. Besides, there were no genealogical links between the Arsakids and Achaemenid satraps contrary to the dynastic patterns com- mon in the Hellenistic Middle East. Keywords: Iran, Cyrus the Great, Achaemenids, Arsakids, Achaemenid legacy In this article I shall try to explain why some rulers of the Arsakid period associa- ted their dynasty with the Achaemenids and what the context was of such declara- tions. The focus of this study is on the kings of Parthia from Arsakes I (248–211 B.C.) to Phraates IV (37–3/2 B.C.). The Achaemenids established the world’s first universal empire, spanning ter- ritories on three continents – Asia, Africa, and (temporary) Europe. The power of the Persians was founded by Cyrus the Great (559–530 B.C.), eulogised by the Iranians, Jews, Babylonian priests, and Greeks as well, who managed to make a not very numerous people inhabiting the lands along the Persian Gulf masters of an empire stretching from Afghanistan to the Aegean Sea, giving rise to the largest state of those times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius'
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2011 The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius' Samuel McVane College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation McVane, Samuel, "The Bare Necessities: Ascetic Indian Sages in Philostratus' 'Life of Apollonius'" (2011). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 362. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/362 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Introduction One might not think that much direct contact occurred between the cultures of ancient Greece and Rome and ancient India. The civilizations lay thousands of miles apart, a vast distance for men who traveled by foot or horse. But in fact, we have much evidence, both material and literary, for rather extensive contact – economic, military, and cultural – between the ancient East and West. One of the most interesting interactions, in my opinion, was the intellectual exchange between the West and ancient Indian philosophers, sages, and religious thinkers. Fortunately, we have a great body of extant ancient Western literature – primarily in Greek – that provide numerous accounts and descriptions, historic, pseudo- historic, and fictional, of Indian wise men and their interactions with the West. This body of literature particularly focuses on portrayals of Indian ascetics who lived a very frugal lifestyle, scorning most material needs, in the pursuit of knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions for Greek and Persian Wars by John R. Hale
    www.YoYoBrain.com - Accelerators for Memory and Learning Questions for Greek and Persian Wars by John R. Hale Category: Cyrus - (4 questions) What was the religion of Persian empire Zoroastrian under Cyrus What was the Greek story about Cyrus's That his grandfather (king Astyages of boyhood Medes) had a dream where his grandson would engulf the world. The king ordered the infant (daughter's son) destroyed. This son grew up to conquer the Medes (father was Persian) What were provincial capitals called under satrapies Persian What capital did Cyrus create for Persia Pasargadae - a series of palaces dotted around a park (where our word paradise comes from) Category: Darius - (10 questions) What advice did Oracle at Delphi give King Go tell the king if he crosses the river, he will Creoesus about Cyrus destroy a great empire. What Greek led delegation to get support for Aristagoras - leader of Miletus Ionian rebellion against Persians in 500 BC went to both Sparta and Athens What did main land Greeks contribute to 20 ships from Athens Ionian rebellion 6 ships from Eretria What happened to cause mainland Greeks after burning Sardis, the Greeks were withdraw from Ionian rebellion from Persians counter attacked by Persians and Athenians barely escaped alive and decided to not deal with Ionians again How many ships did Persia bring to counter 600 Ionian rebellion What leader led the Ionian fleet against Dionysius - tried to drill Greeks but they Persia during Ionian rebellion rebelled and quit training What was the name of naval battle where
    [Show full text]
  • Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum Edited by Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 86 Maren R. Niehoff Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture Mohr Siebeck Maren R. Niehoff, born 1963; studied Jewish Studies, Literature and Philosophy in Berlin, Jeru- salem and Oxford; 1989-91 Junior Fellow at the Society of Fellows at Harvard University; since 1991 Lecturer in the Department of Jewish Thought at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. CIP-Titelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Niehoff, Maren: Philo an Jewish identity and culture / Maren R. Niehoff. - 1. Aufl., - Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2001 (Texts and studies in ancient Judaism ; 86) ISBN 3-16-147611-5 © 2001 by J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), P.O.Box 2040, D-72010 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer in Tübingen, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Heinr. Koch in Tübingen. Printed in Germany ISSN 0340-9570 For Udi, Maya and Ayana Acknowledgements This book had its beginning in the winter of 1995 when Professor Martin Hengel suggested that I contribute a volume to the series "Text and Studies in Ancient Judaism". It took some time until the theme of the present book took shape and work on the individual chapters could begin. Throughout this proc- ess, both editors of the series, Peter Schäfer and Martin Hengel, supported and encouraged me.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Exilic Timeline
    Post-Exilic Timeline Cyrus II: 559-530 BC th October 12 ,​ 539 BC- Babylon falls to Medo-Persian forces led by General Ugbaru ​ (Daniel 5-6) th October 29 ,​ 539 BC- Cyrus II enters city of Babylon, and appoints Ugbaru as king ​ of the region th November 6 ,​ 539 BC- Ugbaru dies. (There is a question as to whether Ugbaru was ​ Darius the Mede in Daniel 5:31, or whether Darius was his successor) 538 BC- Edict of Cyrus II (2 Chronicles 36:22-23/ Ezra 1:1-2) First return of God’s chosen people led by Zerubbabel 537-536 BC- Altar is rebuilt and Temple foundation is laid in Jerusalem 536-530 BC- The Temple rebuild is stalled due to local opposition Cambyses II: 530-522 BC 530-522 BC- Temple work remains halted due to local opposition (Ezra 4:1-5) 522 BC- Cambyses II commits suicide, and his brother Bardiya is murdered by the Megistanes Gaumata: 522 BC 522 BC- The Megistanes (aka the Magi) place one of their own- Gaumata- on the throne. He is only king for a few months before he is assassinated by Darius Hystaspes. 521 BC- Darius Hsystaspes eliminates all opposition and consolidates power for himself Darius Hystaspes: 521-486 BC 520 BC- Darius receives a letter from Tattenai, governor of the region that includes Palestine, asking for a continuation of the policy to keep the Temple from being rebuilt (Ezra 5:6- 6:12) st September 1 ,​ 520 BC- Haggai’s first prophecy (Haggai 1:1-11) ​ th September 24 ,​ 520 BC- Zerubbabel and returning Jews resume work on Temple ​ (Haggai 1:12-15/ Ezra 5:1-5) th October 17 ,​ 520 BC- Haggai’s second prophecy (Haggai 2:1-9) ​ November, 520 BC- Zechariah’s first prophecy (Zechariah 1:1- 1:6) th December 18 ,​ 520 BC- Haggai’s third and fourth prophecies (Haggai 2:10-19/2:20- ​ 23) th February 15 ,​ 519 BC- Zechariah’s second prophecy (Zechariah 1:7- 6:15) ​th December 7 ,​ 518 BC- Zechariah’s third prophecy (Zechariah 7:1- 13:21) ​ 515 BC- Temple rebuild is completed.
    [Show full text]