The Bestiary in Canterbury Monastic Culture 1093-1360 Volume 1: Text
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Bestiary in Canterbury Monastic Culture 1093-1360 Volume 1: Text This thesis is submitted for the degree of PhD at the University of Kent by Diane Elizabeth Heath 31 July, 2015 Word Count: 99,748 ii Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... v Abbreviations and conventions .................................................................................... vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................... xiii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................ xvi Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Major debates in bestiary studies ........................................................... 36 Chapter 2: The bestiary in Canterbury: assessing the catalogue evidence. .......... 63 Chapter 3: The bestiary in Canterbury: assessing the manuscript evidence ....... 115 Chapter 4: The bestiary: shaping and affect in Canterbury monastic culture .... 162 Chapter 5: Bestiary visual imagery in Christ Church decorated initials .............. 219 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 244 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 262 Figures ............................................................................................................................. 293 Appendices ..................................................................................................................... 333 iii Abstract This thesis presents a new way of thinking about medieval bestiaries. It adopts a locational lens to examine the context and monastic re-fashionings of the medieval Latin prose bestiary in Canterbury from 1093-1360. It has examined the catalogue and codicological evidence concerning the monks‘ patronage, ownership, reading and interpretation of these books. It has sought to discover how the bestiary articulated the Canterbury monks‘ affective and self-reflective thought modes and interacted with their other beast literature and animal art. This thesis forms a significant contribution to knowledge on the monastic perception and reception of the bestiary by reshaping our understanding through two original approaches. Firstly, it widens the definition of bestiaries to match medieval viewpoints and therefore includes extant copies and catalogue records of extracts and collations as well as whole and fragmentary bestiary books and contemporary Canterbury Cathedral Priory decorative inhabited and zoomorphic initials. Secondly, it pays close attention to the place, space, and context of the bestiary in terms of associated texts, Benedictine spiritual exegesis, and how, where, when, and why it was studied and for what purposes. This attention has led, among other findings, to the redating of the earliest Latin prose bestiary from England to the time of St Anselm‘s archiepiscopate and confirmed M. R. James‘s view that it was a Canterbury production. This new timeframe has allowed an analysis of the bestiary as part of the Anselmian cultural and intellectual revival and permitted the link between the bestiary and Benedictine preaching to the laity to be examined. It finds strong political reasons for the advancement of the bestiary by Canterbury monks in the twelfth century and for their continued study of the bestiary in the thirteenth century and into the fourteenth century. This thesis provides a methodogical approach regarding how Canterbury monks read their bestiaries and associated texts that is applicable to historians studying such materials elsewhere, thereby enhancing our understanding of Benedictine monastic culture. iv Acknowledgements Writing acknowledgements is the sweetest final task – the chance to thank the very many people who have made this PhD such a pleasurable if occasionally arduous journey. I thank first Dr Barbara Bombi and Dr Alixe Bovey for all their consideration and support. Dr Bombi‘s leave and Dr Bovey‘s appointment to the Courtauld necessitated a new supervisory team. However, Dr Bovey very kindly continued to host supervision meetings at Somerset House. Only Dr Bovey knows how much she has supported me. I greatly benefitted from the supervisory team of Professor Bernhard Klein and Professor A. S. G. Edwards and I am particularly grateful to Professor Edwards for reading my many drafts with unfailing courtesy and patience and giving me the benefit of his immense scholarship so swiftly to keep me on schedule. Without his chivalry in taking on a late supervisory role this thesis would have been far weaker. I am also deeply indebted to my examiners, Dr Ryan Perry and Dr Sophie Page, whose thoughtful criticism and helpful suggestions for future publication I hope to put to good use. I also wish to thank my friends and colleagues whose myriad kindnesses have meant a very great deal to me and who I value most dearly for their unfailing support. Dr Patricia Stewart‘s terrific scholarship on the textual transmission of bestiaries saved me from countless errors and her warmth and friendship have always encouraged me. Dr Sheila Sweetinburgh has been my mainstay, and her sensible grounded approach has been of immesurable help. I have learnt so much from her erudition and her friendship. Caroline Allum, my dear friend, kept me company on many long walks to clear my thoughts. Claire Taylor, administrative manager at the Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (MEMS) has been the kindest and most empathic of mentors, always happy to listen and to help. I also recall with great fondness the friendly advice and shared study with Drs Jayne Wackett, Julia Cruse, Tom Lawrence, and Jan Vandeburie in MEMS, Dr Vicky Arnold-Woods and Pip Gregory in History, and Drs Krista Bonello Rutger v Giappone, Vered Weiss, and Guillaume Collett at SECL. It is also a delight to thank my colleagues during my time teaching at Canterbury Christ Church University – Professor Louise Wilkinson, Dr Leonie Hicks, Professor John Bulaitis, Professor Jackie Eales, Professor Kevin Ruane, Dr Michael Goodrum, Dr Martin Watts, and Dr Lorraine Flisher and Mrs Nicki Marshall for their very great help and positive and caring attitudes. My work has been inspired by many terrific scholars besides those mentioned above. It is an honour to have had the chance to discuss my work with Professor Michael Clanchy, Professor Julia Boffey and the many speakers and members of the London Medieval Society. Similarly, the Reinardus academicians and in particular Professor Paul Wackers and Professor Baudouin van den Abeele, gave me the benefit of their advice on several occasions and led to the strengthening of my thesis structure and arguments. It is also a pleasure to thank Karen Brayshaw of the Canterbury Cathedral Library and Cressida Williams of the Cathedral Archives, and Mark Bateson (now in charge of Maidstone Archives) who have all been so courteous, knowledgeable, and helpful during my many visits. I am very grateful to Sandy Denny at the Wren Library at Trinity College, Cambridge for allowing me to examine the manuscripts and for the superb online digitisation project. It was an honour to meet Christopher de Hamel and I am very grateful to him for giving me the benefit of his expertise and for allowing me access to key Canterbury manuscripts in the Parker Library. All the staff at the British Library manuscripts room have always provided professional and expert help, as have the staff at the Bodleian in Oxford, making their institutions such pleasurable places to visit. Finally, I would never have succeeded in finishing my thesis without the loving support of my family who have graciously put up with my inattentive cooking, intermittent cleaning, and poorly-controlled book-buying habits for years. This thesis is for you. vi Abbreviations Arch. Cant. Archaeologia Cantiana (Journal of Kent Archaeological Society) ALCD M. R. James, The Ancient Libraries of Canterbury and Dover: the catalogues of the libraries of Christ Church Priory and St Augustine’s Abbey and of St Martin’s Priory at Dover (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903) BAA Trans, 35 Medieval Art, Architecture & Archaeology at Canterbury, ed.by A. Bovey, British Archaeological Association Conference Transactions XXXV (Leeds: Maney Publishing, 2013) Baxter 1998 R. Baxter, Bestiaries and their Users in the Middle Ages (Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 1998) BCBB St Augustine’s Abbey, Canterbury Library Catalogue, ed. by B. C. Barker-Benfield, 3 parts, Corpus of British Medieval Library Catalogues, vol.13 (London: British Library, 2008) Binski, Zutshi Western Illuminated Manuscripts: A Catalogue of the Collection in Cambridge University Library, ed. by P. Binski and P. Zutshi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Library, 2011) Black Book The Register of St. Augustine’s Abbey Canterbury commonly called The Black Book, ed., by G. J. Turner, H. E. Salter, 2, (London, 1915, 1924) BL London, British Library BnF Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France Bodl. Oxford, Bodleian Library Brooks Canterbury N. Brooks, The Early History of the Church of Canterbury