Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Private & Confidential

Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Title of Tender: Emulsion to NRJO

Request for Quotation: RFQ EX-1308

Byron Shire Council Participating Councils Council Council

Date of Report 23 August 2019 Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Overview

On 12 July 2019 Local Government Procurement (“LGP”) on behalf of Joint Organisation (NRJO) issued via VendorPanel a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the “Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion”. Participating Councils in this procurement process are Tweed Shire Council, Council, and .

The RFQ documents were published on Local Government Procurement VendorPanel web portal under LGP Panel Contract LGP213-2 Bitumen, Emulsion, Asphalt Materials + Services.

All six Panel Contractors in the category of “Emulsion” were invited to submit their quotations via LGP VendorPanel web portal and they are:

(i) Ashcroft Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Ashpave

(ii) Bitupave LTD T/A Boral Asphalt

(iii) Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd

(iv) Fenworx P/L Trading as Newpave Asphalt

(v) Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd

(vi) Stateline Asphalt Pty Ltd

1.2 Tender Closing & Opening of Submissions

Initial tender closing date was 30 July 2019 but was extended for one more week and closed on 6 August 2019 at 2pm. Three (3) tender submissions were received from the following members of the panel of contractors for Emulsion:

(i) Bitupave LTD T/A Boral Asphalt

(ii) Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd

(iii) Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 2 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

1.3 Witnessing Tender Opening

Opening of tender was witnessed by the following via GoToMeeting online platform:

Name & Title Organisation

Dominic Cavanough - Project Engineer Byron Shire Council

Matt Sorenson - Assets and Design Coordinator Kyogle Council

Evariste Ngenzi – Consultant Procurement Services Local Government Procurement

Mark Osborne - Project Manager Local Government Procurement

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 3 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

2 FACILITATION OF TENDER PROCESS

2.1 Role of Local Government Procurement

2.1.1 The scope of work assigned to Local Government Procurement (LGP) were:

• Preparation of process documentation including Request for Quotation, Evaluation and Probity plan;

• Manage conflict of interest and confidentiality documentation ;

• Organise and facilitate planning meeting;

• Prepare RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed) Form;

• Prepare draft Risk Management documentation;

• Provide guidance on Evaluation criteria and weightings;

• Provide support and briefing to evaluation team;

• Co-ordinate RFQ release via LGP VendorPanel web portal;

• Manage online question forum and addenda release;

• Manage RFQ Opening;

• Conduct Compliance assessment;

• Chair RFQ Evaluation Committee and facilitate evaluation process;

• Seek clarifications, conduct reference checks, co-ordinate financial reports; and

• Prepare RFQ Evaluation & Recommendation Report.

2.2 Compliance Assessment

2.2.1 As per the Evaluation and Probity Plan, the following compliance criteria were assessed in the evaluation of tenders received:

Compliance Sub Section Criteria Legal Business Name Trading Name Tenderer Details CAN ABN Registered Office

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 4 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

Principal Place of Business Completion & submission of all tender schedules:

• Submission Form • Schedule of rates (excel format) • Schedule of Contract Information • Schedule of contractor’s relevant experience • Schedule of Environmental Performance • Schedule of local content information

Compliance • Conformance to the Specification Requirements Valid certificates of currency for Insurances:

• Certificate of Currency for Public Liability Insurance • Certificate of Currency for Product Liability Insurance • Certificate of Currency for Workers Compensation Cover • Commitment to maintain Insurance coverage, licenses and accreditations • Conformance with BNG Conserve requirements

Schedule of rates Schedule of rates (Completed and submitted in Excel format) References Reference contacts provided

2.2.2 Initial compliance check was conducted by LGP to verify conformance of submissions to the immediate requirements of the RFQ as indicated in the above table.

2.2.3 All three (3) tenderers were assessed compliant with minor clarification on one tenderer regarding price item(s) 1.2, 2.2, 3.2 and 4.2 “transport and decanting of Emulsion from nominated supply point to nominated location” expressed in $/Km. The requirement was decided to be removed and consideration was placed on $/Litre instead.

2.3 Weighted Criteria Assessment

2.3.1 All three (3) tenderers were assessed against the qualitative (non-price) and quantitative (price) criteria. Specific criteria were weighted according to their

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 5 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

importance as specified in the Evaluation and Probity Plan and are shown in the table below:

Criteria Weighting

a) Evidence of satisfactory experience 30%

b) Environmental Performance 15%

c) Work Health & Safety (WHS) Requirements 15%

e) Local Content – Resources & Labour 10%

e) Pricing – value for money 30%

Total 100%

2.3.2 The qualitative criteria (non-price) assessment was carried out by the evaluation panel independently scoring the responses according to the evaluation matrix.

2.3.3 The quantitative criteria (price) assessment was carried out using the following formula to determine the overall value for money:

Price Score = (Lowest Tender Price x 100/Tender Price)/10.

2.3.4 Responses were scored based on the following scoring scale from 0 – 10 as shown in the table below:

Definitive Answer Value Judgement 0 Unsatisfactory Fails to meet the requirement. Unimaginative/No apparent economic benefit. 2 Poor Minimal Compliance. Moderately creative/benefits difficult to assess. 4 Satisfactory Moderately satisfies the requirement. Worthwhile concept/may realise benefits. 6 Good Partially satisfies the requirement. Creative/enduring benefits over time. 8 Very Good Satisfies the majority of the requirement. Highly creative/enduring high benefits. 10 Excellent Exceeds the requirement. Exceptional/immediate & enduring high benefits.

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 6 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

2.4 Evaluation of Weighted Criteria & Pricing

2.4.1 The qualitative assessment criteria included a series of questions that the tenderers provided responses to. The responses were evaluated based on the rating scale indicated above by the panel of evaluators made up of the following:

Name Role & Organisation Evaluation Role

Dominic Project Engineer Weighted Criteria & Pricing Cavanough Byron Shire Council Shaun Engineer – Assets & Maintenance Weighted Criteria & Pricing Halberstater Tweed Shire Council

Kyle Armstrong Project Engineer Weighted Criteria & Pricing Kyogle Council Evariste Ngenzi Consultant Procurement Services Compliance Criteria & Local Government Procurement Calculation of price score

2.4.2 The qualitative assessment criteria included a series of questions that the tenderers provided responses to. The responses were evaluated based on the rating scale addressed in indicated above by each individual evaluator independently.

2.4.3 The scoring for the qualitative criteria were completed first before the calculated pricing scores were shared with each evaluator to be inputted into the scoring spreadsheet.

2.4.4 Price scores were calculated as is in the table below: Price Scoring Tweed Tweed Formula Average Tenderer Gray Buchanan Kyogle Byron Price Score = Price Name Street street ($/Lt) ($/Lt) (Lowest Tender ($/Lt) ($/Lt) ($/Lt) Price x 100/Tender Price)/10 BITUPAVE LTD $0.970 $0.980 $0.990 $0.980 $ 0.980 10.00 T/A BORAL DOWNER EDI $1.138 $1.145 $1.198 $1.198 $ 1.170 8.38 WORKS FULTON $1.160 $1.180 $1.180 $1.170 $ 1.173 8.36 HOGAN

2.4.5 After the pricing scores were obtained and included in the evaluation matrix, each evaluator came up with the scores and ranking of tenderers as in the individual evaluator score matrix below:

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 7 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

EVALUATOR ONE:

Scorecard for Rating Scale: 10 = Exceeds the requirement. Exceptional/immediate & enduring high benefits. RFQ EX-01308 - SUPPLY OF 8 = Satisfies the majority of the requirement. Highly creative/enduring high benefits. BITUMEN EMULSION TO NRJO 6 = Partially satisfies the requirement. Creative/enduring benefits over time. 4 = Moderately satisfies the requirement. Worthwhile concept/may realise benefits. 2 = Minimal Compliance. Moderately creative/benefits difficult to assess. 0 = Fails to meet the requirement. Unimaginative/No apparent economic benefit. Score out of 10 in Blue sections BITUPAVE LTD DOWNER EDI FULTON T/A BORAL WORKS HOGAN Weighted Weighted Weighted Selection Criteria Weighting Score Score Score Score Score Score

(Out of 10) (Out of 10) (Out of 10)

COMPLIANCE CRITERIA (SCHEDULES) Y/N Y Y Y 10.0 30.0 8.4 25.1 8.4 25.1 RATES / PRICES Score (As per price formula) 30% Evidence of satisfactory experience 30% 6.0 18.0 6.0 18.0 6.0 18.0 Environmental Performance 15% 6.0 9.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 9.0 Work Health & Safety (WHS) Requirements 15% 8.0 12.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 12.0 Local Content – Resources & Labour 10% 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 Totals 100% 73.0 67.1 66.1 Rank 1 2 3

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 8 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

EVALUATOR TWO:

Score out of 10 in Blue sections BITUPAVE LTD DOWNER EDI FULTON T/A BORAL WORKS HOGAN Weighted Weighted Weighted Selection Criteria Weighting Score Score Score Score Score Score Insert appropriate criteria and alter weightings to suit (Out of 10) (Out of 10) (Out of 10) COMPLIANCE CRITERIA (SCHEDULES) Y/N Y Y Y

10.0 30.0 8.4 25.1 8.4 25.1 RATES / PRICES Score (As per price formula) 30% Evidence of satisfactory experience 30% 8.0 24.0 8.0 24.0 8.0 24.0 Environmental Performance 15% 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 Work Health & Safety (WHS) Requirements 15% 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 Local Content – Resources & Labour 10% 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Totals 100% 80.0 75.1 75.1 Rank 1 2 3

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 9 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

EVALUATOR THREE:

Score out of 10 in Blue sections BITUPAVE LTD DOWNER FULTON T/A BORAL EDI WORKS HOGAN Weight Weighted Weighted Weighted Selection Criteria ing Score Score Score Score Score Score Insert appropriate criteria and alter weightings to suit (Out of 10) (Out of 10) (Out of 10) COMPLIANCE CRITERIA (SCHEDULES) Y/N Y Y Y

RATES / PRICE Score (As per price formula) 30% 10.0 30.0 8.38 25.1 8.36 25.1 Evidence of satisfactory experience 30% 8.0 24.0 8.0 24.0 8.0 24.0 Environmental Performance 15% 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 Work Health & Safety (WHS) Requirements 15% 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 8.0 12.0 Local Content – Resources & Labour 10% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Totals 100% 82.0 77.1 77.1 Rank 1 2 3

2.5 Combined Overall Score and final ranking (non-price & price)

2.5.1 Individual score by each evaluator is summarized below to come up with combined overall score: Evaluator BITUPAVE LTD T/A BORAL DOWNER EDI WORKS FULTON HOGAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Evaluator One 73.0 67.1 66.1 Evaluator Two 80.0 75.1 75.1 Evaluator Three 82.0 77.1 77.1 Combined Overall Score 78.3% 73.1% 72.8% Ranking 1st 2nd 3rd

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 10 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

2.5.2 The qualitative assessment criteria included a series of questions that the tenderers provided responses to. The responses were evaluated based on the rating scale indicated in section 2.3.4 above by each individual evaluator independently.

2.5.3 Furthermore, overall estimated annual costs were calculated to determine overall value for money based on the estimated annual quantity in the table below:

BITUPAVE LTD T/A BORAL DOWNER EDI WORKS FULTON HOGAN INFRASTRUCTURE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Delivery Total Estimated Tank Estimated Annual Tank Annual Annual Tank Locations Annual Total Clean Total Qty $/Lt Clean per Qty $/Lt Qty $/Lt Clean Cost Annual per Annual (Emulsion) year $ (Emulsion) (Emulsion) per year (Emulsion) Cost $ year Cost $ in Lts in Lts in Lts $ Tweed Gray Street 140,000 $0.97 $ 135,800 $2,392.50 140,000 $1.138 $ 159,320 $ - 140,000 $1.180 $ 165,200 $ 3,300 Tweed Buchanan Street 70,000 $0.98 $ 68,600 $2,516.80 70,000 $1.145 $ 80,150 $ - 70,000 $1.180 $ 82,600 $ 3,300

Kyogle 70,000 $0.99 $ 69,300 $2,747.80 70,000 $1.198 $ 83,860 $ - 70,000 $1.160 $ 81,200 $ 3,300

Byron 175,000 $0.98 $ 171,500 $2,632.30 175,000 $1.198 $ 209,650 $ - 175,000 $1.170 $204,750 $ 3,300 Estimated total annual cost $ 445,200 $10,289.40 $ 532,980 $ - $ 533,750 $ 13,200 Estimated total annual cost (Emulsion + Tank Clean) $455,489.40 $532,980 $546,950

Ranking 1st 2nd 3rd

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 11 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

2.6 Indication of estimated annual cost per Council / Site

2.6.1 The table below provides indication of estimated annual cost per site based on the estimated annual quantities by the highest (1st) ranked tenderer:

BITUPAVE LTD T/A BORAL Estimated Estimated Total Annual Total Delivery Locations Annual estimated cost Annual Tank Clean Qty $/Lt per site Cost per year $ (Emulsion) (Emulsion + (Emulsion) in Lts Tank Clean) $ Tweed Gray Street 140,000 $0.97 $ 135,800 $ 2,392.50 $ 138,192.50 Tweed Buchanan Street 70,000 $0.98 $ 68,600 $ 2,516.80 $ 71,116.80

Kyogle Council 70,000 $0.99 $ 69,300 $ 2,747.80 $ 72,047.80

Byron Shire Council 175,000 $0.98 $ 171,500 $ 2,632.30 $ 174,132.30

2.7 Contract period

2.7.1 The initial contract period will be for a two (2) year period commencing September 2019 until 31 August 2021 with the option of a further 1 + 1 year extension.

2.7.2 Performance reviews will be held regularly to assess compliance with the Contract requirements.

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 12 of 14

Recommendation Report: RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO

3 BASIS OF DECISION

3.1 Details of Referee Report

The referee report summarised in the table below, supports the recommendation for Bitupave LTD T/A Boral Asphalt as the preferred supplier.

REFEREE INFORMATION PROVIDED Council: Maranoa Regional Council Supply and delivery of CRS Emulsion – Contact name : Lynda Allen Excellent Performance Contact #: (07) 4624 0734 Council: North Burnett Regional Council Supply and delivery of CRS Emulsion – Contact name: Kylie Buckholz Excellent Performance Contact # 1300 696 272 Council: Lockyer Valley regional Council Supply and delivery of CRS Emulsion – Contact name: Randall Olm Excellent Performance Contact # 1300 005 872 Company: Bitupave (NSW) Supply and delivery of CRS Emulsion and Contact name: David Webber Precoat – Referee could not be reached on Contact # 0417 312 006 phone

3.2 Final Recommendation

3.2.1 Based on the evaluation process, the evaluation panel is of the view that Bitupave LTD T/A Boral Asphalt meets relevant selection and evaluation criteria and demonstrates the best value for money for the Councils.

3.2.2 The Tender evaluation panel (TEP) recommends Bitupave LTD T/A Boral Asphalt for appointment as the successful tenderer for the supply and delivery of bitumen emulsion to NRJO participating Councils of Tweed, Byron and Kyogle with the following quoted price rates per unit:

Supply & Delivery of Emulsion Tank Clean Location $/Litre (Once per Year) Tweed - Gray Street $0.97 $ 2,392.50 Tweed - Buchanan Street $0.98 $ 2,516.80 Kyogle Council - Highfield Road, Kyogle $0.99 $ 2,747.80 Byron Shire Council - Byron Works Depot Bayshore Drive $0.98 $ 2,632.30

Recommendation Report - RFQ EX-01308 Supply & Delivery of Bitumen Emulsion to NRJO Page 13 of 14