Democracy in the EU After the Lisbon Treaty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Democracy in the EU After the Lisbon Treaty 2 The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, on December 1 2009, D IAI Research Papers The IAI Research Papers are brief monographs written by one or brought the EU’s troubled institutional reform process to an end. EMOCRACY more authors (IAI or external experts) on current problems of inter- N. 1 European Security and the Future In an eort to increase the EU's democratic legitimacy, the Treaty DEMOCRACY IN THE EU national politics and international relations. The aim is to promote of Transatlantic Relations, introduces some relevant innovations: it extends the powers of greater and more up to date knowledge of emerging issues and edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Erik Jones, 2011 the European Parliament, it enhances the role of European trends and help prompt public debate. IN AFTER THE ISBON REATY L T N. 2 Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty, political parties, it involves national parliaments increasingly in the THE edited by Raaello Matarazzo, 2011 EU legislative process and, nally, it creates the European Citizens’ EU Initiative, which allows citizens to invite the Commission to submit A non-prot organization, IAI was founded in 1965 by Altiero Spinelli, AFTER legislative proposals that they feel are of crucial importance. its rst director. Nevertheless, the implementation of these provisions will not be The Institute aims to promote understanding of international politics through research, promotion of political ideas and strategies, disse- easy as they impact on, among other things, the EU's institutional THE mination of knowledge and education in the eld of foreign policy. balance. Not only does it remain to be seen how eective they will L ISBON IAI main research sectors are: European institutions and policies; be in bringing EU institutions closer to citizens, but the application Italian foreign policy; trends in the global economy and internationa- of some of these provisions could lead to inter-institutional T lisation processes in Italy; the Mediterranean and the Middle East; conicts and political ambiguities. In this context, the European PAPERS REATY defence economy and policy; and transatlantic relations. Parliament has a key role to play as a political and institutional facilitator, also in promoting more consistent linkages between citizens and the EU institutional system. RAFFAELLO MATARAZZO is Researcher at the Istituto Aari Internazionali RESEARCH (IAI), Adjunct Professor in Government and Politics of Western Europe at the St. John’s University of New York’s Rome Campus IAI and editor-in-chief of the IAI webzine AarInternazionali. Raaello Matarazzo Edited by Raffaello Matarazzo Istituto Affari Internazionali (Rome) Centro Studi sul Federalismo (Turin) Notre Europe (Paris) www.nuovacultura.it 13.00 EURO IAI Research Papers Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty Edited by Raffaello Matarazzo Istituto Affari Internazionali (Rome) Centro Studi sul Federalismo (Turin) Notre Europe (Paris) Edizioni Nuova Cultura Acknowledgements This volume has been made possible by funding from the Compagnia di San Paolo of Turin. Series Editor Natalino Ronzitti _________________________ First published 2011 by Edizioni Nuova Cultura For Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) Via Angelo Brunetti 9 - I-00186 Roma www.iai.it Copyright © 2011Edizioni Nuova Cultura - Roma ISBN: 9788861347168 Cover: by the author Graphic Composition: by the author The unauthorized reproduction of this book, even partial, carried out by any means, including photocopying, even for internal or didactic use, is prohibited by copyright. Contents List of Contributors ........................................................................................................................ 7 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 11 Gianni Bonvicini 1. European Political Parties: The Missing Link ........................................................ 15 Julian Priestley Introduction: European parties, seven years on .................................................. 15 1. The 2009 European Elections .................................................................................. 19 2. The division of the spoils ........................................................................................... 23 3. Outside the formal structures .................................................................................. 27 4. Political parties - consolidating enlargement ................................................... 29 5. The parties and public opinion ................................................................................ 29 6. Four modest reforms ................................................................................................... 31 7. Can we? .............................................................................................................................. 40 2. National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty: A New Power Player or Mr. No in the EU Decision Making? ....................................................................... 43 Raffaello Matarazzo Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 43 1. Democratic legitimacy and accountability: a new role for NPs ................ 45 2. The Lisbon Treaty provisions .................................................................................. 47 3. The four domains of NPs participation at EU level ......................................... 51 4. Concluding remarks ..................................................................................................... 62 3. The European Citizens’ Initiative: Challenges and Perspectives .................. 65 Salvatore Aloisio, Giorgio Grimaldi, Umberto Morelli, Antonio Padoa-Schioppa Introduction. Democracy in the European Union (EU): General remarks .................................................................................................................................. 65 5 CONTENTS 1. The European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) ............................................................... 73 2. The European Commission’s proposal for a regulation of the ECI ......... 85 3. ECIs: suggestions and outlook ................................................................................. 91 4. Critical analysis of the European Commission’s regulation proposal and the debate in progress .......................................................................................... 129 5. Concluding remarks .................................................................................................. 139 4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 151 Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa Programme of the Workshop, Turin, November 3, 2010 ........................................ 155 List of participants .................................................................................................................... 157 6 List of Contributors SALVATORE ALOISIO, Professor, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia GIANNI BONVICINI, Executive Vice-President, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome GIORGIO GRIMALDI, Professor, University of Valle d’Aosta RAFFAELLO MATARAZZO, Researcher, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome and Adjunct Professor, St. John’s University of New York, Rome Campus UMBERTO MORELLI, Director, Centro Studi sul Federalismo, Turin, and Professor, University of Turin ANTONIO PADOA-SCHIOPPA, President, Centro Studi sul Federalismo, Turin and Professor, University of Milan TOMMASO PADOA-SCHIOPPA, President, Notre Europe, Paris JULIAN PRIESTLEY, Member of the Board, Notre Europe, Paris 7 List of Abbreviations AFCO Committee on Constitutional Affairs (European Parliament) CDU Christlich Demokratische Union (Christian Democratic Un- ion, Germany) CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union (see also ECJ) CODAC Conference of Defence Affairs Committees COFACC Conference of Foreign Affairs Committee Chairpersons CoR Committee of Regions COREPER Committee of Permanent Representatives COSAC Conference of Community and European Affairs Committees CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy CSU Christlich-Soziale Union (Christian Social Union, Germany) EC European Commission ECAS European Citizen Action Service ECHR European Court of Human Rights ECI European Citizens’ Initiative ECJ European Court of Justice (see also CJEU) EESC European Economic and Social Committee EFA European Free Alliance EFD Europe of Freedom and Democracy EGTC European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation ELDR European Liberal Democrat and Reform ENoP European Network of Political Foundations EP European Parliament EPP European People’s Party EU European Union EUDO European Union Democracy Observatory 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS EURATOM European Atomic Energy Community GM Genetically Modified GUE European United Left ID Identity Document IPEX Interparliamentary EU Information Exchange IT Information Technology LA Local Authority MEP Member of the European Parliament MMM Monday Morning Meeting MS Member States NGL Nordic Green Left NGO Non-Governmental Organization NP National Parliament PES Party of European Socialists PETI Committee on Petitions (European Parliament) PvdA Partij
Recommended publications
  • Covid Era: the Middle Class in Focus Lucie Tungul, Ed
    The (Post)Covid Era: The Middle Class in Focus Lucie Tungul, ed. Alexandra Alvarová Elmar Nass Horst Heitz Rumiana Stoilova Zdeněk Tůma Danuše Nerudová Luděk Niedermayer Jakub Charvát Jaroslav Poláček Ladislav Cabada Michael Romancov Tomáš Prouza Jiří Pehe Bedřich Moldan Lubor Lacina Alena Zemplinerová Filip Nerad Michael Žantovský Eva Zamrazilová Tomáš Petráček Martin Kastler Print ©Jutty, Přerov, 2020 This is a joint publication of the Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Hanns-Seidel- Stiftung and TOPAZ. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. It was funded by the Federal Foreign Office based on a decision of the German Bundestag/Gefördert vom Auswärtigen Amt aufgrund eines Beschlusses des Deutschen Bundestages. The Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, TOPAZ and the European Parliament assume no responsibility for the facts or opinions expressed in this publication or any subsequent use of the information contained therein. Sole responsibility lies with the authors of the publication. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known to or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing of the copyright owner except for personal use. Contact: ©TOPAZ Opletalova 1603/57 11000 Praha 1 Czechia For more information please visit: http://www.top-az.eu/home/ The chapters
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • A-8-2016-0354 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0354/2016 28.11.2016 *** RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08523/2016 – C8-0329/2016 – 2016/0126(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht RR\1110883EN.docx PE592.131v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_NLE-AP_Agreement Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) PE592.131v03-00 2/17 RR\1110883EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION ................................. 5 SHORT JUSTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 6 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ................................................... 10 ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS .......................... 14 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................................................... 16 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 17 RR\1110883EN.docx
    [Show full text]
  • TTIP-Letter-To-Schul
    Mr. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. Paul-Henri Spaak, 09B011 60, rue Wiertz B-1047 Bruxelles 7 July 2016 Dear Mr. Schulz, In anticipation of the 14th round of negotiations between the EU and US for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) planned to start on 11 July in Brussels, we are writing to you on behalf of over 65 organisations representing consumers, farmers, not-for-profit health insurers, environmental and general public interest groups to express our serious concerns that the European Commission is failing to respect the European Parliament’s 2015 Resolution on TTIP. 1 Today, we released new analysis, which demonstrates that the European Commission continues to ignore critical aspects of the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP, in particular regarding recommendations related to protecting public health, the environment, and democracy. 1. Negotiating on and affecting EU chemicals and pesticides rules The European Parliament has called on the European Commission not to negotiate on issues “where the EU and the US have very different rules” and not to allow regulatory cooperation to affect future standards in such areas. However, the European Commission has continued to negotiate on issues that will affect legislation on chemicals, pesticides, and cosmetic products, whether directly or through regulatory cooperation. This is particularly worrying because the European Commission is already lowering current EU standards of protection (such as on limits to pesticide residues in food) in order to remove barriers to trade. 2. Respect for the EU regulatory system The European Parliament has called on the European Commission “to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 9 May 2012
    13.7.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 206 E/1 Wednesday 9 May 2012 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2011-2012 SESSION Sittings of 9 and 10 May 2012 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 9 MAY 2012 (2012/C 206 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Welcome . 2 4. Composition of Parliament . 3 5. Verification of credentials . 3 6. Interpretation of the Rules of Procedure . 3 7. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 8. Documents received . 3 9. Written declarations (submission) . 9 10. Lapsed written declarations . 9 11. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 9 12. Action taken on Parliament's resolutions . 9 13. Order of business . 9 14. Statements by the President . 9 C 206 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 13.7.2012 Wednesday 9 May 2012 Contents (continued) Page 15. Tribute . 10 16. Future of Europe (debate) . 10 17. Roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union ***I (debate) . 10 18. Follow-up to the LIBE delegation visit to Sicily and Lampedusa (debate) . 11 19. Law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) (debate) . 12 20. Trade and investment strategy for the Southern Mediterranean following the Arab Spring revolutions (debate) . 12 21. Patenting of essential biological processes (debate) . 13 22. Composition of Parliament . 13 23. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance . 13 24. Regional airports and air services (short presentation) . 13 25. Agenda of the next sitting .
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 10 November 2010
    27.1.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25 E/1 Wednesday 10 November 2010 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2010-2011 SESSION Sittings of 10 and 11 November 2010 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 10 NOVEMBER 2010 (2011/C 25 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Statements by the President . 2 4. Composition of Parliament . 3 5. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 6. Composition of committees and delegations . 3 7. Documents received . 4 8. Action taken on Parliament’s positions and resolutions . 8 9. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 8 10. Oral questions and written declarations (submission) . 8 11. Transfers of appropriations . 9 12. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 10 13. Order of business . 11 14. Upcoming EU-US summit and Transatlantic Economic Council - EU-US Data Protection Agreement (debate) . 12 C 25 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.1.2011 Wednesday 10 November 2010 Contents (continued) Page 15. EU external strategy on Passenger Name Record (debate) . 13 16. Alternative investment fund managers ***I (debate) . 14 17. Single Market Act (debate) . 15 18. Innovation partnerships (debate) . 15 19. Strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU (debate) . 16 20. Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ***I (debate) . 17 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium
    Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium 10 September 2013 Dear Vice-President Reding Pre-trial detention in the EU As the European Commission, Council and Parliament have recognised, ‘excessively long periods of pre-trial detention are detrimental to the individual, can prejudice cooperation between the Member States, and do not represent the values for which the European Union stands’.1 We are writing to you now to follow-up on the European Union’s work to tackle this problem and to urge the Commission to continue its work in this area beyond the current legislative programme, including developing a timeframe for tabling a legislative proposal setting common minimum standards for the use of pre-trial detention in the EU. We understand that the European Commission is at this stage intending to focus on monitoring the implementation of three Framework Decisions: the European Supervision Order (ESO); the Prisoner Transfer Framework Decision; and the Framework Decision on the application of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions and is not currently proposing legislation. We take note of this emphasis on effective implementation but would highlight that only one of the three Framework Decisions, the ESO, has the potential to impact on pre-trial detention. While it may go some way to alleviating problems faced by non-nationals by enabling them to return home while awaiting trial, even this is very limited in scope. In addition, the three Framework Decisions are all pre-Lisbon measures and the European Commission therefore currently has no enforcement powers if problems with their implementation are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Data Privacy and Data Security 2015
    DATA PrivAcy AnD DATA securiTy rePorT 2015 upDates inDustry 4.0 Botnet seCurity poliCy interConneCtivity seCret CoDe CyBerwar regulation rules CryptograpHy Big Data CyBerspaCe Data proteCtion integrity CyBer DeFense Center Firewall virus proteCtion BasiC rigHts Digitization enCryption Control meCHanism DDos attaCk Data proteCtion oFFiCer rules it seCurity aCt inFormational selF-Determination passworD rules it seCurity HaCker ClouD serviCes eu general Data proteCtion regulation Data minimization selF-Determination emergenCy plan DATA PrivAcy AnD DATA securiTy rePorT 2015 DATA PrivAcy AnD DATA securiTy rePorT 2015 14 The generAl Data ProTecTion regulation sTrengThens The sTrengThs of The euroPeAn iT inDusTry conTenTs 06 A key sTeP TowArDs fAir comPeTiTion Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European The grounDbreAking ruling shAking 16 Parliament SecuriTy for The uP The DigiTAl economy 21 Dr. Thomas Kremer, fourTh inDusTriAl Member of the Board of Management for Data Privacy, revoluTion Legal Affairs and Compliance at Deutsche Telekom Reinhard Clemens, CEO of T-Systems and Member of Deutsche Telekom’s Board of Management and Director of its IT Division 08 Beginning The journey To moDern-day data Policies Dr. Thomas de Maizière, 10 Data securiTy AnD 22 Capturing The mArkeT…. Federal Minister of the Interior PrivAcy Are imPorTAnT eAsy, fAsT AnD secure issues for germAny’s Dr. Ferri Abolhassan, DomesTic inTelligence Member of the Management Board service of T-Systems International Dr. Heinz-Georg Maaßen, President of the BfV 52 Welcome To The zeTTAbyTe Age 27 creating TrusT Anette Bronder, Lothar Schröder, Member of T-Systems Inter- 12 A big sTeP forwArD inTo Deputy Chairman of the Supervisory national’s Board of Manage- The DigiTAl revoluTion Board at Deutsche Telekom and ment and Director of its Vĕra Jurová, Chairman of the Data Protection Digital Division European Commissioner for Justice, Advisory Board Consumers and Gender Equality 18 Europe and its privacy shield Wolfgang Kopf, LL.M.
    [Show full text]
  • EGP Committee 2015-2019 DIVISION of TASKS and RESPONSIBILITIES
    EGP Committee 2015-2019 DIVISION OF TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Countries – REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION Bulgaria Eastern MED / Eastern Balkans Group Cyprus Monica Frassoni Greece Evelyne Huytebroeck Romania Turkey Azerbaijan Belarus East of European Union Group Georgia Lena Lindström Moldova Péter Ungár Russia Ukraine Albania Croatia Western Balkans Group Kosovo Oras Tynkkynen Macedonia Michel Reimon Montenegro Serbia Slovenia Czech Republic Visegrad Group Hungary Reinhard Bütikofer Poland Péter Ungár Slovakia Austria Lake Constance Group Germany Reinhard Bütikofer Luxembourg Michel Reimon Switzerland Belgium Channel and Isles Group Ireland Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Netherlands Michel Reimon UK Andorra France Western and Mediterranean Group Italy Monica Frassoni Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Malta Portugal Spain Denmark Estonia Baltic and Nordic Group Finland Lena Lindström Latvia Oras Tynkkynen Lithuania Norway Sweden EGP Committee 2015-2019 (15 Dec 2015, updated 12 Sept 2016) 1 EGP Committee 2015-2019 DIVISION OF TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Working Groups Migration Monica Frassoni Reinhard Bütikofer Foreign and Security Policy Oras Tynkkynen Reinhard Bütikofer Trade Michel Reimon Monica Frassoni Future of Europe Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Membership Review To be decided Mar Garcia Inclusion Evelyne Huytebroeck Networks Balkan Network Oras Tynkkynen Evelyne Huytebroeck Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Gender Network Michel Reimon Evelyne Huytebroeck Local Councilors Network Péter Ungár Individual Supporters Network (ISN) TBD (Mar Garcia, Reinhard Bütikofer,
    [Show full text]
  • Für Die Wahl Der Abgeordneten Des Europäischen Parlaments Am 25
    Stimmzettel für die Wahl der Abgeordneten des Europäischen Parlaments am 25. Mai 2014 im Freistaat Bayern Du hast 1 Stimme CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. Liste für den Freistaat Bayern 1. Markus Ferber, Dipl.-Ing./MdEP, Schwabmünchen 6. Bernd Posselt, Redakteur/MdEP, München 2. Dr. Angelika Niebler, Rechtsanwältin/MdEP, Vaterstetten 7. Martin Kastler, MdEP, Schwabach 1 3. Mafred Weber, Dipl.-Ing. (FH)/MdEP, Wildenberg 8. Barbara Becker, Dipl.-Pädagogin, Wiesenbronn 4. Monika Hohlmeier, MdEP, Bad Staffelstein 9. Christian Doleschal, Student, Brand 5. Albert Deß, Landwirt/MdEP, Berngau 10. Heike Maas, Europareferentin/Dipl.-Kauffrau, Söchtenau SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder 1. Martin Schulz, Buchhändler, Würselen (NW) 6. Evelyne Gebhardt, MdEP, Schwäbisch Hall (BW) 2. Birgit Sippel, MdEP, Arnsberg (NW) 7. Jens Geier, MdEP, Essen (NW) 2 3. Udo Bullmann, Politikwissenschaftler, Gießen (HE) 8. Jutta Steinruck, MdEP, Ludwigshafen am Rhein (RP) 4. Kerstin Westphal, Erziherin/MdEP, Schweinfurt (BY) 9. Ismail Ertug, Krankenkassenbetriebswirt, Kümmersbruck (BY) 5. Bernd Lange, MdEP, Burgdorf (NI) 10. Dr. Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Dipl.-Japanologin, Berlin (BE) GRÜNE BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder 1. Rebecca Harms, MdEP, Waddeweitz (NI) 6. Jan Philipp Albrecht, Jurist, Hamburg (HH) 2. Sven Giegold, Wirtschaftswissenschaftler, Düsseldorf (NW) 7. Dr. Helga Trüpel, MdEP, Bremen (HB) 3 3. Franziska Keller, Islamwirtschaftlerin, Berlin (BE) 8. Martin Häusling, Bio-Bauer, Bad Zwesten (HE) 4. Reinhard Bütikofer, Politiker, Berlin (BE) 9. Theresa Reintke, Dipl.-Politologin, Oberhausen (NW) 5. Barbara Lochbihler, Politologin/MdEP, Berlin (BE) 10. Michael Cramer, MdEP, Berlin (BE) FDP Freie Demokratische Partei Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder 1.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection IMCO_PV(2017)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2017, 15.00-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15.06 on Monday, 25 September 2017, with Anneleen Van Bossuyt (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted as shown in these minutes. 2. Chair’s announcements A. Webstreaming The Chair reminded Members that the meeting is webstreamed live. B. eMeeting The eMeeting application (http://europarl.europa.eu/emeeting) is available to all IMCO Members, their assistants and political group staff on their tablet or laptop to access the meeting documents C. Newsletter Members were informed that the new issue of IMCO's Newsletter (Nr.84) is available. D. Mission to US The Chair gave a brief overview of the IMCO mission to the US which she qualified as extremely interesting. Furthermore, she indicated that a report would be submitted soon by the secretariat. E. New Members The Chair welcomed the 2 new Members who joined the IMCO Committee: - Mr Andràs GYÜRK (Hungary) - EPP - Mr: John Stuart AGNEW (United Kingdom) - EFDD PV\1135042EN.docx PE610.806v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 3. Approval of minutes of meetings 12-13 July 2017 PV – PE608.134v01-00 4 September 2017 PV – PE609.670v01-00 4. Report on ongoing interinstitutional negotiations IMCO/8/05638 Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles Rapporteur: Daniel Dalton (ECR) Speakers:
    [Show full text]