DOCSLIB.ORG

Surveillance Programme 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surveillance Programme 2012 z DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION INDIA SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 2012 (ANNUAL SURVEILLANCE & REGULATORY AUDIT) 1 DGCA-INDIA SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAMME 2012 FORE WORD India is a contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and a member of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), DGCA India has an obligation to promote safe, orderly and efficient operation of Civil Aviation activities. To meet State obligations, DGCA has laid down national regulations to ensure compliance with various Standard & Recommended Practices laid down by ICAO in Annexes to the convention. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is a regulatory body dealing with safety issues. DGCA is also responsible for regulation of air transport services to/from/within India and for enforcement of Civil Air Regulations, Airworthiness, Operations and Air safety. DGCA consists of Technical and Administration Directorates. Technical Directorates are, Airworthiness Directorate, Aerodr- ome Standards Directorate; Air Safety Directorate; Air Transport Directorate; Air Traffic Management Directorate, Flight Standard Directorate, CNS & ATM, Regulations& Information Directorate; Aircraft Engineering Directorate, Flying & Training Directorate, Cabin Crew Safety Division & Dangerous Goods Division. Surveillance Enforcement Division (SED) in DGCA Headquarters is the office coordinating and consolidating the ―DGCA Safety Oversight System‖. DGCA Hqrs. is located in New Delhi with Regional offices in the various parts of India. There are 14 (fourteen) Regional Airworthiness Offices located at Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Cochin, Bhopal, Lucknow& Kanpur, Patna, Patiala, Guwahati, and Bhubaneshwar. Apart from the Regional Airworthiness Offices, there are 5 (five) Regional Air Safety offices located at Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata and Hyderabad and AED office located at Bangalore. The DGCA oversight program for the year 2012 is based on ―RISK BASED OVERSIGHT‖. The philosophy includes the state to set priorities in safety oversight. This risk based system makes it possible to reduce inspection efforts for good performing organization with high(er) risk profiles. The DGCA Safety oversight program has been divided into 4 areas 1. Surveillance Activities (Planned Inspection) 2. Regulatory Audit (Planned Audit) 3. SOFA 4. Spot Check (Unplaned Checks) 2 DGCA-INDIA SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAMME 2012 I. Surveillance: DGCA has developed a system of surveillance to ensure continuing organizational, as well as individual, professional competency of license/rating/certificate/approval holders. The surveillance ensures the capability of an operator to ascertain an acceptable level of Safety in the area of Civil Aviation. Surveillances provide essential information of the State of compliance of organization & individual participants, identifying any corrective action needed to bring performance up to the required level. Surveillance aims to identify and correct non- compliance behaviors and unsafe practices before they cause any accident or incident. DGCA surveillance activity covers all participants in Civil Aviation System. (―Participants‖ include all organizations, individuals, products as well as services, procedures & facilities for which an aviation document is required by the Aircraft Rules to operate in the civil aviation system). Surveillance Programme for the aviation activities for the operator/organization shall be inspected as per the ASP On completion of the surveillance, the deficiencies observed by the DGCA officers are listed and discussed in a de-briefing meeting wherein the operator/organization representatives may give their views. After final discussion, deficiencies/non- conformity notices are listed in Deficiency Reporting Form CA-2001 Rev-1, as per procedure manual of directorates which is duly signed by the officer(s) and forwarded to the concerned operator/organization. For every deficiency observed, the operator/organization is required to set the target date for making good the deficiency on Form CA-2001 Rev-1 and submit the same to the DGCA office for acceptance. On receipt of such form, DGCA officers will review the target date before acceptance of the same. Notwithstanding the above, DGCA may take disciplinary action such as suspension, cancellation/restricting the scope of approval wherever serious violations of laid down requirements are noticed and emergent action is required. Any failure on the part of the operator/organization to rectify the deficiency satisfactorily and within the time frame set and as agreed by DGCA, may invite appropriate action as per the Rules. Director General (CA) has operationalised the Annual Surveillance Programme (ASP) of 2011 successfully, carried out number of surveillance inspections and detected number of Level 1 and Level 2 defficiencies. These deficiencies have been addressed successfully by all the stake holders. This has ensured strict compliance of Regulations.This has ultimately led to enhancement in aviation safety. Director General (CA) has prepared an improved version of Annual Surveillance Programme (ASP) based on experiences gained during 2009 to 2011 and comprises of all Directorates. Further DGCA also analysis the field data/ descripency reported during past surveillance activities. DGCA also identified the week area of the operators and the area of concerns.The results of the analysis has been incorporated for the development of new ASP 2012.The programme has been developed after taking into account available resources in the organization. 3 DGCA-INDIA SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAMME 2012 A monthly programme of Surveillance is also prepared, which covers all Schedule/Non Schedule/ PrivateOperators/ General Aviation Organisations/ State Govt Aircraft and their operations/ Oil companies and also Safety Assessment of ForeignAirlines. Airworthiness Directorate shall carry out night surveillance for Schedule/Non Schedule operators every month.Surveillance Inspection of Foreign Airlines shall be jointly carried out by inspectors from Flight Inspection Directorate and Airworthiness Directorate as per the monthly program.Survellance Division will co-ordinate in this matter. A monthly progress report of ASP will be submitted by all Regional Offices (including their Sub-Regional Offices) to their respective Directorates in Hqrs. by 10th of the following month on prescribed proforma. All Directorates at Hqrs. shall send report to Nodal Officer of SED by the 15 th of the following month in the form of Table A, B1, B2, B3, B4, C, E & F. A monthly review of ASP/Audits will be held on every 20th of the following month in DGCA Hqrs., wherein monthly progress, shortfalls against monthly targets will be analyzed by DGCA along with analysis of identified deficiencies categorized into level II. All level I deficiencies are analyzed in the Board of Aviation Safety meeting which is being conducted 5 thof the following month in DGCA Hqrs. These deficiencies will be fed into the ASP Data Pool for resolution, tracking and dissemination of safety related issues. Director General (CA) appeal to all officials of DGCA and the stake holders to participate in the surveillance programe in a constructive and positive manner so that regulation are strictly compiled with there by contributing over all aviation safety .It is expected that by collective endevaour India shall continue to remain well above the International standards. II Regulatory Audits Besides the surveillance, regulatory audits will be carried out during the year with an aim to ascertain the internal control of any organisation in its activities and to ensure compliance of regulatory requirements. A circular on Regulatory Audit Policy and Program has been issued on 21 st December 2011, enclosed (Appendix 1) Regulatory Audit Program (RAP) - 2012 . The primary office for Regulatory Audit is Directorate of Air Safety (Hqrs).The Nodal officer for Regulatory Audit Program (RAP) -2012 will be Sh.Lalit Gupta, DDG (Air Safety) . All report of the RAP -2012 has to be submitted to the Nodal officer. Schedule/ Non Schedule Airlines/MROs will be subjected to Regulatory Audits. 4 DGCA-INDIA SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAMME 2012 . For operators having less than 3 aircraft will be subjected to Annual Surveillance Program only unless there are critical audit findings. The review of the Regulatory Audit will form a part the monthly Surveillance Meeting and will be monitored on a regular basis. III. SOFA Inspection Under Article 16 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation,States are entitled to search aircraft from other States on landing and departure and to inspect the certificates and other documents. Further, paragraph 4.2.2.2 of ICAO Annex 6 (Operation of Aircraft,Part I — International Commercial Air Transport — Aeroplanes)alsorequires that States shall establish a programme with proceduresfor the surveillance of operations in their territory by a foreignoperator and for taking appropriat e action when necessary to preservesafety. There are 84 foreign airlines/cargo operators who are to be covered by SOFA inspection as per the AIC No.5/2009dated 3rd June 2008. So far, 49 foreign airlines have been inspected under SOFA. 35 foreign airlines/cargo operators are yet to be inspected. In the year 2012, 43 foreign airlines/cargo operators have been identified for SOFA inspection as per the following :- 35 foreign airlines/cargo operators who have not been inspected sofar. 08 foreign airlines/cargo operators who have been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 669419-1 EFFICIENCY of AIRLINES in INDIA ABSTRACT This Paper Measures the Technical Efficiency of Various Airlines Operating In
    Natarajan and Jain Efficiency of Airlines in India EFFICIENCY OF AIRLINES IN INDIA Ramachandran Natarajan, College of Business, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville TN, 38505, U.S.A. E-Mail: [email protected] , Tel: 931-372-3001 and Ravi Kumar Jain, Icfai Business School, IFHE University, Hyderabad-501203 (AP) India. E-Mail: [email protected] , Mobile: 91+94405-71846 ABSTRACT This paper measures the technical efficiency of various airlines operating in India over a ten-year period, 2001-2010. For this, the Input Efficiency Profiling model of DEA along with the standard Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to gain additional insights. The study period is divided into two sub-periods, 2001-2005 and 2006-2010, to assess if there is any impact on the efficiency of airlines due to the significant entry of private operators. The study includes all airlines, private and publicly owned, both budget and full service, operating in the country offering scheduled services on domestic and international routes. While several studies on efficiency of airlines have been conducted globally, a research gap exists as to similar studies concerning airlines in India. This paper addresses that gap and thus contributes to the literature. Key Words: Airlines in India, DEA analysis, Input efficiency profiling, Productivity analysis, Technical efficiency. Introduction The civil aviation industry in India has come a long way since the Air Corporation Act was repealed in the year 1994 allowing private players to operate in scheduled services category. Several private players showed interest and were granted the status of scheduled carriers in the year 1995. However, many of those private airlines soon shut down.
    [Show full text]
  • CFA Institute Research Challenge CFA Society India
    CFA Institute Research Challenge hosted by CFA Society India submitted by Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (India) The CFA Institute Research Challenge is a global competition that tests the equity research and valuation, investment report writing, and presentation skills of university students. The following report was submitted by a team of university students as part of this annual educational initiati ve and should not be considered a professional report. Disclosures: Ownership and material conflicts of interest The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not hold a financial interest in the securities of this company. The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not know of the existence of any conflicts of interest that might bias the content or publication of this report. Receipt of compensation Compensation of the author(s) of this report is not based on investment banking revenue. Position as an officer or a director The author(s), or a member of their household, does not serve as an officer, director, or advisory board member of the subject company. Market making The author(s) does not act as a market maker in the subject company’s securities. Disclaimer The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources generally available to the public and believed by the author(s) to be reliable, but the author(s) does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy or completeness. The information is not intended to be used as the basis of any investment decisions by any person or entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trend in Indian Air Transport with Reference to Transport Economics and Logistic
    © 2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Recent Trend in Indian Air Transport with Reference to Transport Economics and Logistic Dr Vijay Kumar Mishra, Lecturer (Applied Economics), S.J.N.P.G College, Lucknow Air transport is the most modern means of transport which is unmatched by its speed, time- saving and long- distance operation. Air transport is the fastest mode of transport which has reduced distances and converted the world into one unit. But it is also the costliest mode of transport beyond the reach of many people. It is essential for a vast country like India where distances are large and the terrain and climatic conditions so diverse. Through it one can easily reach to remote and inaccessible areas like mountains, forests, deserts etc. It is very useful during the times of war and natural calamities like floods, earthquakes, famines, epidemics, hostility and collapse of law and order. The beginning of the air transport was made in 1911 with a 10 km air mail service between Allahabad and Naini. The real progress was achieved in 1920 when some aerodromes were constructed and the Tata Sons Ltd. started operating internal air services (1922). In 1927 Civil Aviation Department was set up on the recommendation of Air Transport Council. Flying clubs were opened in Delhi, Karachi, Calcutta (now Kolkata) and Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1928. In 1932 Tata Airways Limited introduced air services between Karachi and Lahore. In 1932, Air India began its journey under the aegis of Tata Airlines, a division of Tata Sons Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Broadcasting Television Network Business in Indonesia?
    Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) Rendra WIDYATAMA Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business University of Debrecen, Hungary Communication Department University of Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia Case WHO OWNS THE BROADCASTING Study TELEVISION NETWORK BUSINESS IN INDONESIA? Keywords Regulation, Parent TV Station, Private TV station, Business orientation, TV broadcasting network JEL Classification D22; L21; L51; L82 Abstract Broadcasting TV occupies a significant position in the community. Therefore, all the countries in the world give attention to TV broadcasting business. In Indonesia, the government requires TV stations to broadcast locally, except through networking. In this state, there are 763 private TV companies broadcasting free to air. Of these, some companies have many TV stations and build various broadcasting networks. In this article, the author reveals the substantial TV stations that control the market, based on literature studies. From the data analysis, there are 14 substantial free to network broadcast private TV broadcasters but owns by eight companies; these include the MNC Group, EMTEK, Viva Media Asia, CTCorp, Media Indonesia, Rajawali Corpora, and Indigo Multimedia. All TV stations are from Jakarta, which broadcasts in 22 to 32 Indonesian provinces. 11 Network Intelligence Studies Volume VI, Issue 11 (1/2018) METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION The author uses the Broadcasting Act 32 of 2002 on In modern society, TV occupies a significant broadcasting and the Government Decree 50 of 2005 position. All shareholders have an interest in this on the implementation of free to air private TV as a medium. Governments have an interest in TV parameter of substantial TV network. According to because it has political effects (Sakr, 2012), while the regulation, the government requires local TV business people have an interest because they can stations to broadcast locally, except through the benefit from the TV business (Baumann and broadcasting network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of Domestic Airlines for the Year 2016
    Subject: Performance of domestic airlines for the year 2016. Traffic data submitted by various domestic airlines has been analysed for the month of September 2016. Following are the salient features: Passenger Growth Passengers carried by domestic airlines during Jan-Sept 2016 were 726.98 lakhs as against 590.21 lakhs during the corresponding period of previous year thereby registering a growth of 23.17 % (Ref Table 1). 800.00 726.98 Growth: YoY = + 23.17 % MoM = + 23.46% 700.00 8 % 590.21 600.00 500.00 400.00 2015 2016 300.00 200.00 Pax Lakhs) Carried(in Pax 82.30 100.00 66.66 0.00 YoY MoM Passenger Load Factor The passenger load factors of various scheduled domestic airlines in Sept 2016 are as follows (Ref Table 2): 100.0 93.2 93.5 89.4 90.0 86.0 83.3 82.8 82.1 82.1 81.7 79.9 79.0 78.9 77.7 77.7 77.5 75.6 80.0 73.72 72.7 70.8 69.2 65.57 70.0 64.48 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 Pax Pax FactorLoad (%) 20.0 10.0 0 0.0 0.0 Air Jet JetLite Spicejet Go Air IndiGo Air Air Asia Vistara Air Trujet Air India Airways Costa Pegasus Carnival Aug-16 Sep-16 1 The passenger load factor in the month of Sept 2016 has almost remained constant compared to previous month primarily due to the end of tourist season. Cancellations The overall cancellation rate of scheduled domestic airlines for the month of Sept 2016 has been 0.42 %.
    [Show full text]
  • Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue by Ideaworks
    Issued 29 August 2012 The Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue by IdeaWorks Table of Contents 2012 Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue ................................................................................... 4 Europe and Russia ............................................................................................................................... 17 The Americas........................................................................................................................................ 28 Asia and the South Pacific ................................................................................................................. 52 Middle East and Africa ........................................................................................................................ 63 Currency Exchange Rates Used for the Worldwide Statistics .................................................. 67 Disclosure to Readers of this Report IdeaWorks makes every effort to ensure the quality of the information in this report. Before relying on the information, you should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to your particular circumstances. IdeaWorks cannot guarantee, and assumes no legal liability or responsibility for, the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information. The views expressed in the report are the views of the author, and do not represent the official view of Amadeus. Issued by IdeaWorksCompany.com LLC Shorewood, Wisconsin, USA www.IdeaWorksCompany.com The free distribution of this report
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India
    2009 StudyStudy on on ImpactCompetition of Trade Issues in Liberalisationthe Domestic in the Information Technology SectorSegment on Development of the Air Draft ReportTransport Sector in Administrative Staff College of India HyderabadIndia Revised Final Report 2007 Administrative Staff College of India, Hyderabad Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India Table of Contents Sl.No Chapter Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. ToR I 4 3. ToR II & III 15 4. ToR IV 29 5. ToR V 30 6. ToR VI & VII 43 7. ToR VIII 91 8. ToR IX 99 9. ToR X 120 10. ToR XI 121 11. Conclusions and Recommendations 126 12. References 129 ____________________________________________________asci research and consultancy ii Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India List of Tables Table Title Page No. No. I.1 Calculation of HHI 12 I.2 Fleet Size of All Scheduled Airlines 12 I.3 Order for Airplanes 13 I.4 Net Profit/Loss incurred by Different Airlines 16 II.1 City Pair-wise Herfindahl index of Pax. Carried in 2006-07 28 17 II.2 Passenger Load Factor for Indian 22 II.3 Passenger Load Factor for Indian 25 II.4 Slots on Delhi-Mumbai Route 28 II.5 Average Age of Fleet 28 II.6 Fleet Size of All Scheduled Airlines 29 IV.1 Descriptive Statistics for Price Data: Delhi – Mumbai 30 IV.2 Taxes and Surcharges on Route : Delhi – Mumbai 32 IV.3 Taxes and Surcharges on Route : Mumbai – Delhi 32 IV.4 Pre merger (2006/07)-Delhi-Mumbai (passenger wise) 36 IV.5 Post Merger(2008) -Delhi Mumbai (slot wise) 36 IV.6 Pre merger (2006/07)-Delhi-Chennai (passenger wise) 37 IV.7 Post Merger(2008) -Delhi Chennai(slot wise) 37 IV.8 Pre merger (2006/07)-Bangalore-Chennai (passenger wise) 37 IV.9 Post Merger(2008) -Bangalore- Chennai(slot wise) 38 ____________________________________________________asci research and consultancy iii Competition Issues in the Air Transport Sector in India List of Figures Figure Title Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKET LENS 13255 Intraday Pic SUNTV Resistance 13449 Intraday Pick PETRONET 13504 Intraday Pick GODREJPROP
    Institutional Equity Research NIFTY 13393 IN FOCUS December 09, 2020 Support 13324 Stock in Focus Kalpataru Power MARKET LENS 13255 Intraday Pic SUNTV Resistance 13449 Intraday Pick PETRONET 13504 Intraday Pick GODREJPROP EQUITY INDICES Indices Absolute Change Percentage Change Domestic Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD BSE Sensex 45,609 182 0.4% 5.4% 10.6% CNX Nifty 13,393 37 0.3% 6.0% 10.1% S&P CNX 500 11,089 18 0.2% 8.0% 12.3% SENSEX 50 14,013 42 0.3% 5.9% 10.0% International Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD DJIA 30,174 104 0.4% 2.6% 5.7% NASDAQ 12,583 63 0.5% 8.9% 40.2% NIKKEI 26,707 240 0.8% 7.2% 12.8% HANGSENG 26,550 245 0.9% 1.0% (5.8%) ADRs / GDRs Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD Dr. Reddy’s Lab (ADR) 67.8 0.2 0.2% 7.6% 67.0% Tata Motors (ADR) 12.5 (0.1) (0.6%) 24.1% (3.7%) STOCK IN FOCUS Infosys (ADR) 16.0 0.4 2.5% 10.1% 55.1% f Kalpataru Power (KPP) and its subsidiary, JMC Projects are the ICICI Bank (ADR) 13.9 (0.1) (0.6%) 4.7% (8.1%) plays on large opportunities in seven key infrastructure segments in HDFC Bank (ADR) 67.4 0.1 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% India and abroad. We expect total opportunities worth ~Rs8 trillion Axis Bank (GDR) 42.6 0.1 0.2% 6.4% (19.9%) over the next 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Indian Aviation Disasters with Loss of 20 Or More Lives
    WORST AVIATION ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INDIA AND INDIA-BASED AIRCRAFT All accidents resulting in 20 or more deaths Date Location Aircraft Deaths Remarks Cause 11-12-1996 Haryana state Saudia B 747, 349 Incl 312 on B 747 Mid-air collision. Kazakh crew Kazakh IL-76 and 37 on IL-76 blamed. Insufficient facilities at Delhi airport. 23-06-1985 Atlantic, off Air India B 747 329 Bomb explosion. Errors in Ireland baggage checking. 2 killed in related incident in Tokyo. 01-01-1978 Off Mumbai Air India B 747 213 Instrument failure and pilot error just after takeoff. 22-05-2010 Mangalore Air India Exp B 737 158 8 surv. Overshot due to pilot error. 19-10-1988 Ahmedabad IA B 737 133 2 surv. Undershot due to pilot error. 24-01-1966 Mont Blanc, Air India B 707 117 Navigation error while landing France at Geneva. Dr Homi Bhabha among dead. 07-02-1968 Himachal IAF AN-12 98 Hit mountain in snowstorm. Pradesh Wreckage found in 2003. 13-10-1976 Mumbai IA Caravelle 95 Engine fire just after takeoff. Maintenance blamed, also crew did not cope correctly. 07-07-1962 NE of Alitalia DC-8 94 Crashed on high ground, Mumbai pilot error while approaching Mumbai. 14-02-1990 Bangalore IA A320 92 54 surv. Failure of controls, pilots blamed for reacting wrongly. 14-06-1972 Near Delhi JAL DC-8 90 Incl 4 on ground, Approached too low, pilot 3 surv. error. 19-11-1978 Leh IAF AN-12 78 Incl 1 on ground Flaps failure on approach.
    [Show full text]
  • UDAN-Regional Connectivity Scheme
    MEMBERS REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI REFERENCE NOTE For the use of Members of Parliament NOT FOR PUBLICATION No.11/RN/Ref/March/2018 REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY SCHEME – UDAN Prepared by, Shri Naushad Alam, Additional Director (23034299) and Smt. Shalima Sharma, RO of Lok Sabha Secretariat under the supervision of Smt. Kalpana Sharma, Joint Secretary and Smt. Anita Khanna, Director. The Reference Note is for personal use of the Members in the discharge of their Parliamentary duties, and is not for publication. This Service is not to be quoted as the source of information as it is based on the sources indicated at the end/in the context. REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY SCHEME – UDAN Introduction The Ministry of Civil Aviation launched the 'Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) UDAN---- Ude Desh Ka Aam Naagrik' on 21 October 2016 with the twin objectives of1: i. Promoting Balanced Regional Growth; and ii. Making Flying Affordable For Masses The scheme is a major step towards making flying a reality for the small town common man. With the launch of UDAN, the Aviation Sector is set to get a big boost and tap huge market of middle class flyers living in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities2. Highlights of the Scheme3 Pay only Rs. 2500 per seat for One Hour of flight by an aeroplane or a journey covered in 30 minutes by the helicopter. In a Century of Civil Aviation, only 76 airports connected by scheduled commercial flights but now in 16 months of UDAN, 56 unreserved airports and 30 unreserved helipads awarded for connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty
    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]