DOCSLIB.ORG

Promotion of Cooperatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Promotion of Cooperatives List of recurring abbreviations International Labour Conference 89th Session 2001 Report V (2) Promotion of cooperatives International Labour Office Geneva I Promotion of cooperatives ISBN 92-2-111959-9 ISSN 0074-6681 First published 2001 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. ILO publications can be obtained through major booksellers or ILO local offices in many countries, or direct from ILO Publications, International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. Catalogues or lists of new publications are available free of charge from the above address. Printed in Switzerland ATA II List of recurring abbreviations CONTENTS Page LIST OF RECURRING ABBREVIATIONS . V INTRODUCTION . 1 REPLIES RECEIVED AND COMMENTARIES . 3 PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS . 141 III Promotion of cooperatives IV List of recurring abbreviations LIST OF RECURRING ABBREVIATIONS Austria BfT Chamber of Agriculture of Tyrol LuFAS Agricultural and Forestry Employers’ Association of Salzburg PKLK Presidents’ Conference of the Chambers of Agriculture of Austria Azerbaijan AEC Azerbaijan Entrepreneurs’ Confederation ATUC Azerbaijan Trade Union Confederation Barbados BWU Barbados Workers’ Union Belgium CNT National Labour Council Brazil CNC National Confederation of Commerce CNI National Confederation of Industry OCB Association of Brazilian Cooperatives Burkina Faso CNPB National Employers’ Council of Burkina Faso CNTB National Confederation of Workers of Burkina Faso Chad CST Confederation of Unions of Chad Chile CPC Confederation of Production and Commerce Croatia SSSH Union of Autonomous Trade Unions of Croatia URSH Association of Workers’ Trade Unions of Croatia Denmark FDC Federation of Danish Cooperatives Egypt FEI Federation of Egyptian Industries ETUF Egyptian Trade Union Federation Estonia EAKL Estonian Association of Trade Unions Finland Palvelutyönantajat Employers’ Confederation of Service Industries in Finland Suomen Yrittäjät Federation of Finnish Enterprises TT Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers SAK Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions V Promotion of cooperatives STTK Finnish Confederation of Salaried Employees Pellervo Confederation of Finnish Cooperatives France CFDT French Democratic Confederation of Labour GNC National Association of Cooperative Federations Germany BDA Confederation of German Employers’ Associations Ghana GEA Ghana Employers’ Association TUC Trades Union Congress Greece PASEGES Pan-Hellenic Confederation of Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives Italy Confcooperative Confederation of Italian Cooperatives Legacoop National League of Cooperatives and Mutual Associations Japan NIKKEIREN Japan Federation of Employers’ Associations JTUC-RENGO Japanese Trade Union Confederation Jordan ACI Amman Chamber of Industry FJCC Federation of Jordanian Chambers of Commerce GFJTU General Federation of Jordanian Trade Unions Lebanon MHC Ministry of Housing and Cooperatives NFC National Federation of Cooperative Societies Malaysia MAPA Malayan Agricultural Producers’ Association MEF Malaysian Employers Federation MTUC Malaysian Trades Union Congress ANGKASA National Co-operative Organisation of Malaysia Malta MEA Malta Employers’ Association GWU General Workers’ Union UHM Union Haddiema Maghqudin AOC Apex — Organisation of Co-operatives Mauritius MLC Mauritius Labour Congress Mongolia CMTU Confederation of Mongolian Trade Unions Morocco ODC Office for Cooperative Development Panama CACPYMER Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Services Cooperative VI List of recurring abbreviations Philippines BLE Bureau of Local Employment ILS Institute for Labor Studies Poland OPZZ All-Poland Trade Union Alliance Spain CCOO Trade Union Confederation of Workers’ Committees CIG Galician Inter-Union Confederation Sri Lanka MCD Ministry of Co-operative Development CCE Ceylon Co-operative Employees’ Federation Switzerland UPS Confederation of Swiss Employers Tanzania, United Republic of TFTU Tanzania Federation of Free Trade Unions Trinidad and Tobago ECA Employers’ Consulting Association CCUL Co-operative Credit Union League of Trinidad and Tobago Ukraine ASMPEU Association of Small, Medium-sized and Privatized Enterprises of Ukraine TUWAIU Central Committee of the Trade Union of Workers of the Agro-Industrial Complex of Ukraine United Arab Emirates FCCI Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry VII Replies received and commentaries INTRODUCTION At its 274th Session (March 1999) the Governing Body of the International Labour Office decided to place on the agenda of the 89th Session (2001) of the International Labour Conference the question of the promotion of cooperatives. In accordance with article 39 of the Standing Orders of the Conference, which deals with the preliminary stages of the double-discussion procedure, the office drew up a preliminary report,1 intended to serve as a basis for the first discussion of the question. The report contains an introduction to the question, an examination of the changing environment of cooperatives in developing, transition and industrialized countries and an analysis of the prerequisites for success in the promotion of coopera- tives based on the law and practice in various countries. The report was accompanied by a questionnaire and was communicated to the governments of member States of the ILO, which were invited to send their replies so as to reach the Office no later than 30 June 2000. At the time of drawing up the present report, the Office had received replies from the governments of the following 95 member States: Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Guyana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Republic of Korea, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Morocco, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Senegal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, United Republic of Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zimbabwe. Some replies arrived too late to be included in their entirety in the report; however, essential elements of these late replies have been included as far as possible. All replies received by the Office may be consulted by delegates at the Conference. The governments of the following 60 member States stated that their replies had been drawn up after consultation with employers’ and workers’ organizations, and some included in their replies the opinions expressed on certain points by these organ- izations, or referred to them: Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Jordan, 1 ILO: Promotion of cooperatives, Report V(1), International Labour Conference, 89th Session, Geneva, 2001. 1 Promotion of cooperatives Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lithuania, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Senegal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo, United States, Zimbabwe. Other governments sent separately the observations from employers’ and workers’ organizations without referring to them, and in some cases replies were received directly from employers’ and workers’ organ- izations. Owing to the nature of the subject under discussion replies were also received from a number of national cooperative organizations. This report has been drawn up on the basis of the replies received, the substance of which, together with brief commentaries, is given in the following pages. The Pro- posed Conclusions appear at the end of the report. 2 Replies received and commentaries REPLIES RECEIVED AND COMMENTARIES This section contains the substance of the replies to the questionnaire which ac- companied the preliminary report. Each question is reproduced and followed by a list indicating the governments that replied to it, grouped in accordance with the nature of the replies (affirmative, negative or other). Where there is an observation qualifying or explaining the reply, the substance of each observation is given, in alphabetical order of countries, after the abovementioned list. Where a reply deals with several questions, or refers to an earlier question, the substance of the reply is given under the first of these questions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The COVID-19 Outbreak Update from Legacoop, Italy
    The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399... Advancing social justice, promoting decent work ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy This update provide insights on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Italian cooperative enterprises, and measures being taken by them to support workers, members/customers, and people in their communities affected by the crisis. News | 27 March 2020 "We are women and men cooperators who are present right alongside the doctors and nurses, keeping hospitals clean, operating in supermarkets, offices, warehouses, kitchens and thermal power plants. We are the ones working in social cooperatives to keep assistance alive for populations that were already vulnerable before the pandemic and are even more so after.” - Mauro Lusetti, President, Legacoop The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted life dramatically in Italy. On 25 March there were 74,386 confirmed cases with 7,503 deaths and 9,362 recoveries. The stringent measures adopted by the Italian Government, needed to slow down and contain the virus, have had seriously detrimental consequences for enterprises in the country. Regarding cooperative enterprises, if the emergency situation and the measures around the coronavirus pandemic continue for a longer period, it is expected that workers at risk could reach at least 265,000. This estimate is based on the number of workers and worker members in cooperatives in a number of key sectors, including: Social cooperatives pointed out that 200,000 workers could be at risk only in their sector, as they are precluded from carrying out activities of general interest, such as taking care of elderly and disabled people due to the closure of day centres, or interruption of home care, as well as 1 sur 4 17/04/2020 à 10:43 The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399..
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Models, work and employment, ecosystem and public policies International Cooperative Alliance Asia and Pacific & 9, Aradhana Enclave +91-11-26888067 ica-asia and pacific Sector-13, R. K. Puram International Organisation of the Industrial and Service Cooperatives New Delhi-110066 +91-11-26888250 icaapac [email protected] icaasiapacific ica-ap.coop Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Table of contents List of tables iv List of figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iv Abbreviations and acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Synthesis note 1 Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2 The scope of target types of the present study ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 3 Method����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2 ‘Type’ and ‘model’�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Literatures a Color
    Study on the social enterprises ecosystem in Emilia-Romagna RaiSE Enhancing social enterprises competitiveness through improved business support policies This publication only reflects the author’s views. The programme authorities are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Contents Summary 1. Definition and Criteria in the regional context 2. Characteristics and development of social enterprises 3. Needs assessment and main challenges for scaling social enterprises 4. Ecosystem of business support tools and instruments 5. Gap analysis and policy recommendations Annex 1 Interview Grid Annex 2 Summary of the Interviews Bibliography Sitography – enterprises involved in the mapping 1 SUMMARY This research project was carried out within the framework of the European RaiSE Interreg Europe project, whose objective is to improve regional policy instruments for the competitiveness and sustainability of social enterprises. The development agencies involved in the project - from Emilia-Romagna, Catalonia, Ireland, Scotland, Hungary (Budapest) and Orebro (Sweden) - mapped the economy and social entrepreneurship ecosystems in their respective regional contexts, bringing out a highly varied and interesting scenario. ERVET internal working group, in charge of mapping and analysing the needs of the Emilia-Romagna social cooperatives and enterprises, involved the regional project stakeholders (Emilia-Romagna Region, Legacoop, Confcooperative, AGCI, Forum del Terzo Settore, Aster, ANCI). These contributed to identifying the survey sample whilest AICCON (Italian Association for the Promotion of the Culture of Cooperation and Non Profit) supported the work from the scientific point of view. Chapter 1 of the research report outlines the framework for social enterprises starting from the definition given by the European Commission and describes the social economy context in Emilia-Romagna.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Cooperatives in Japan
    MASS-SPECC Chairperson’s and Managers’ Forum July 5th 2019 in Cagayan de Oro City, the Philippines. Worker Cooperatives in Japan Japan Workers’ Co-operative Union (JWCU) Board Member / International Relations Officer Osamu Nakano International Co-operative Alliance (ICA) Founded: 1895 President: Ariel Guarco (Argentine Republic) Member Countries/Organizations: 109 / 312 (2019) Regional Offices: Africa, Americas, Asia and Pacific, Europe Sectors: International Cooperative Agricultural Organization International Cooperative Banking Association Consumer Cooperatives Worldwide International Cooperative Fisheries Organization International Health Cooperative Organization Cooperative Housing International International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation International Organization of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers’ Cooperatives (CICOPA) 2 Member individuals/coops: 1.2 Billion / 3 Million 300 largest co-operatives had a combined annual turn-over of $2.2 trillion USD. Cooperatives generate partial or full-time employment for at least 280 million individuals worldwide, either in or within the scope of co-operatives, making up almost 12% of the entire employed population of G20 countries. United Nations estimates that cooperatives support the livelihoods of almost half of the total global population. The Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives (COPAC) : UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs/DESA, Food and Agriculture Organization/FAO, International Labour Organization (Cooperative Unit),
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial and Service Cooperatives 2013 - 2014 Index
    GLOBAL REPORT INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES 2013 2014 GLOBAL REPORT ON INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES 2013 - 2014 INDEX Copyright © 2015, CICOPA Graphic design: Juan J. Burgos Marqués INTRODUCTORY NOTE 7 FACTS AND FIGURES ABOUT INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES AROUND THE WORLD 9 EVOLUTION, DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED AND SOLUTIONS FOUND WITHIN OUR NETWORK 19 OUR NETWORK: CICOPA MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS WORLDWIDE 29 5 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This is the first global biannual report on industrial and service cooperatives and their representative institutions. It is the result of two different surveys carried out among CICOPA’s members during the first half of 2014, which were eventually updated: each of these two surveys is at the origin of the following two sections which, together, are aimed at providing a picture of our cooperative sector in the world. As we will examine in the following pages, the close to 65,000 enterprises that are directly part of our world network as affiliates of CICOPA member organizations employ over 3 million people. However, according to material collected during our recent inter-sectoral study Cooperatives and Employment: a Global Report1, released at the International Summit of Cooperatives in Quebec in October 2014, there is evidence that this world phenomenon is quantitatively much wider: worker cooperatives, social cooperatives and cooperatives of self-employed producers in industry and services together employ over 16 million people worldwide. The vast majority of these persons are members and, therefore, the owners of their enterprise, which they jointly and democratically control. The cooperatives in our network are involved in a very wide array of industrial and service sectors, from mechanical industries to cultural centres, from schools to nano-technologies, from construction to health care.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece Sep
    International Organisation of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers’ Cooperatives A sectoral organisation of the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) Promoting cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece _____________________________________________ How to promote the social economy in Greece through social cooperatives, worker cooperatives, and cooperatives of artisans and of SMEs Final report to the ILO September 9, 2013 1 2 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Introduction by Bruno Roelants, CICOPA Secretary General 5 PART 1. THE SITUATION IN GREECE 7 1.1. The s ocial impact of the crisis 7 1.2. Evolution and s tate o f the art of cooperatives and the social economy in Greece 9 1.3. Analysis of the existing relevant legislation 15 PART 2. MAIN RELEVANT NATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN THE CICOPA NETWORK THAT COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE GREEK CONTEXT 20 2.1. T he CICOPA network 20 2.2 Social services, with a special focus on crèches and homes for the elderly 22 2.3 . Business transfers to the employees under the worker cooperative form 25 2.4. Cooperatives among artisans, profess ionals and micro -enterprises 31 2. 5. The production of renewable energy by cooperatives 33 2. 6. Constitution of cooperative incubators 35 2. 7. Financial instruments for the development of cooperatives 36 2.8 . Constitution of networks, groups and consor tia 41 2. 9. Worker and social cooperatives in rural contexts 46 2.1 0. Multi -stakeholder cooperatives 49 2.1 1. Mixed and transitional forms of cooperatives 50 2.1 2. Cooperatives and emerging sectors: tourism 51 2.1 3. Worker coop eratives dealing with specific social challenges 53 PART 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Op Sprouts from Grass Roots
    Rural COOPERATIVESCOOPERATIVESJanuary/February 2016 Co-op Sprouts from Grass Roots Commentary VAPG program can be a good fit for co-ops By Sam Rikkers, Administrator Noteworthy in this article is an additional motivation Rural Business Cooperative Service behind the creation of the co-op: the members’ desire to help USDA Rural Development create jobs and generate economic stimulus in rural areas of the state where the economic recovery has been slow to Regular readers of this magazine are likely reach. Commitment to bettering the communities of their well aware of USDA’s commitment to members is a core belief behind the cooperative movement, cooperative education and its role in which is well evidenced by this co-op. Equally laudatory is promoting the use of cooperative businesses the co-op’s commitment to helping hired farmworkers make as a way to strengthen the rural economy. the transition to farm owners and co-op members. USDA Rural Development also manages a number of That article is followed by another that provides a look at financial programs that can help producer cooperatives, one a recent VAPG award which helped launch a much-needed of which is the Value-Added Producer Grants (VAPG) processing alternative for small- and medium-sized chicken program. producers in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley area. Since the VAPG program was launched in 2001, it has VAPGs are awarded through a national competition, and provided cooperatives and other producer-owned businesses — in most years — USDA receives many more applications across the nation and U.S. territories with more than $308 than we have funds for.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE, ICA CCR, CASC Conference
    ACE, ICA CCR, CASC Conference Co-operative Entrepreneurship May 27-30 2019 Montreal, Quebec, Canada Register Here Day and Details (Please note that this program is subject to change) time Monday - May 27, 2019 YOUTH DAY (FREE PARTICIPATION) 8:30am - 9:00am Registration 9:00am - 9:30am Welcoming remarks - Johanne Lavoie 9:30am - 10:30am The Social Values of Cooperatives - Senta Breuning, Nicola Gindele & Reiner Doluschitz *(English - Simultaneous translation in French) 10:30m - 11:30am The Outline of the Business Model Adapted to Start-up Cooperatives - Kristalna Vincent, Hélène Turcotte & Arianne Tessier *(French - Simultaneous translation in English) 11:30am - 12:00pm Lunch 12:00pm - 1:00pm 1:00pm - 2:00pm Cooperative Education: Training the Next Generation - Pierre-Anne Turmel *(French - Simultaneous translation in English) 2:00pm - 2:15pm Break Cooperative Opportunities: A Strategy for Small Business Succession - Sean Goebey & Meg Ronson *(English - Simultaneous translation in French) 2:15pm - 3:15pm 3:15pm - 3:45pm As a Young Person, How Can We Encourage the Younger Generation in the Cooperative Movement? - Caroline Joly & Dènik Dorval *(Bilingual) 3:45pm - 5:00pm Break 5:00pm - 8:00pm Opening reception Tuesday - May 28, 2019 DAY 1 7:15am - 8:15am Registration 8:15am - 8:45am Welcoming remarks COOPERATIVE DIFFERENCES EDUCATION SESSION WORKSHOP SESSION Legal Form as a Determinant of ESG *Service-Learning as a Methodological Outcomes in Direct Offering Retail-Level Strategy to Promote Social Impact Investments: A comparative Entrepreneurship Among Young People analysis of co-operative, not-for-profit, - Josune López Rodríguez and private corporations in Ontario - Sean Cambell The Co-operative Performance *The Reinforcement of the Cooperative Indicators as seen by Canadian Bicycle Identity: An Element to Be Considered Co-ops, Coop Vélo-Cité, Coop Roue-Libre Breakout sessions, by the Cooperative Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Cooperatives for New York City
    FEDERATION OF PROTESTANT WELFARE AGENCIES Worker Cooperatives for New York City: A Vision for Addressing Income Inequality Jennifer Jones Austin, CEO/ Executive Director January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary Page 3 II. Introduction: The Need For Page 6 Worker Cooperatives III. The Crisis of The New York City Economy Page 7 IV. The Potential of Worker Cooperatives Page 12 V. Worker Cooperatives in New York City Page 15 and The Cooperative Movement VI. How Have Worker Coops Functioned in Page 25 Other Places? VII. Challenges to Worker Cooperatives in Page 29 New York City Today VIII. Current City Services for Page 32 Economic Development IX. Conclusions Page 33 X. Recommendations Page 34 XI. Acknowledgements Page 38 XII. Endnotes Page 39 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WORKER COOPERATIVES FOR NEW YORK CITY: A VISION FOR ADDRESSING POVERTY AND INEQUALITY The Federation of Protestant Welfare Agencies (FPWA) presents this report, Worker Cooperatives for New York City: A Vision for Addressing Income Inequality, as an examination of one solution for the challenges facing New York’s workers: worker cooperative businesses. Indeed, the report’s key finding is that worker cooperatives can easily fit into a broad campaign to cope with poverty, long-term joblessness, the growing isolation of low-wage workers and unprecedented levels of income inequality. But it is clear that in order for this to take place, there must be a strong embrace of public policies and support for individuals, new businesses and human services organizations to carry this effort. And so FPWA calls on New York City’s public and private leadership to join together in supporting this promising option for improving the social and economic well-being of greater New York’s most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Co-Op Power • April 2021
    2104_local covers custom.qxp 3/15/21 3:34 PM Page 8 THE EXODUS OF THE LADY WHO SAVED THE AGELESS WONDER ThE RuNaWay SCRaPE TExaS bLuEboNNETS oF LighTNiNg bugS FoR PEdERNaLES EC MEMbERS a P R i L 2 0 2 1 Rare Vintage Football star-turned- vintner finds that life gets better with age SPECiaL EdiTioN CELEBRATING OUR LINEWORKERS SEE PagE 18 PLUS 20 Journey to Journeyworker 22 PEC Winter Storm Response 24 Lineworkers: Then and Now NEWEST FLEET ALONG THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER NEW ENGLAND SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI RIVER PACIFIC NORTHWEST ALASKA With the introduction of our Modern Riverboat Series, American Cruise Lines is elevating the standard for U.S. riverboat cruising. Aboard these brand new ships that feature modern design, spacious staterooms with private balconies, and a grand multi-story atrium, experience the future of U.S. riverboat cruising. River Cruising Done Perfectly.™ Largest Staterooms Award-Winning Excursions Spacious Lounges Call today for your FREE Cruise Guide 2 0 2 0 1-800-459-2596 AmericanCruiseLines.com contents April 2021 04 currents The latest buzz 06 tcp talk Readers respond 18 co-op news Information plus energy and safety tips from your cooperative 29 Footnotes in texas history The Bluebonnet Lady of Texas By Sheryl Smith-Rodgers 30 tcp Kitchen Fresh Herbs By Megan Myers 34 hit the road Heart of the Matter 12 By Chet Garner 08 37 Focus on texas The Seed The Photo Contest: Flourishes Runaway Storms Former NFL player Alphonse Dotson turns idea sowed in Scrape 38 observations Houston into notable grapes The exodus of Texians is the Flashes of the Past and wines in Central Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership: the Emilia Romagna Model – in More Detail
    Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership http://dept.kent.edu/oeoc/oeoclibrary/emiliaromagnalong.htm Economics, Cooperation, and Employee Ownership: The Emilia Romagna model – in more detail John Logue There are at least two European models for employee ownership that demand American attention. The one is the Mondragon cooperative group in the Basque region of Spain which has been frequently discussed in American employee ownership circles (see, for instance, “Lessons of Mondragon’s Employee-Owned Network,”Owners at Work XII:1, 5-9 and “From Mondragon to Ohio,” Owners at Work XIII:1, 16-17). The other is the much less well known complex of employee-owned companies in the Emilia Romagna region in Northern Italy around Bologna. I had the good fortune to take a week’s study trip to the employee-owned sector in Northern Italy this last summer with a delegation from the Boston-based Cooperative Charitable Trust to see the Emilian model first hand. In some ways, Emilia Romagna and the Basque co-ops are very different. In the Basque region, the Mondragon employee cooperatives grew out of Catholic social teaching and Basque nationalism in the 1950s and 1960s. In Emilia Romagna, by contrast, the co-ops grew up with the 19th century labor movement but split into three different partisan political federations -- Catholic, Socialist/Communist, and Social Democratic/Republican -- in the 20th century. They have no link to ethnic or linguistic minorities. In other ways, they are very similar. Both appear to owe their success today to a combination of small scale, flexible employee-owned firms which achieve economies of scale to compete globally through collaborative research and development strategies, cooperative export efforts, their own financial institutions, and other forms of collaboration and cooperation that are largely or completely missing in the employee-owned sector in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cooperatives
    Social Co­operatives a Democratic Co-production Agenda for Care Services in the UK by Pat Conaty, Research Associate, Co-operatives UK Acknowledgements Co­operatives UK would like to thank both our members and the many others who contributed so much of their time and expertise at the Deliberative Inquiry event held in Birmingham in July 2013. These participants are listed at Appendix 3 and we are most grateful for their input and to the inspiring group of speakers at the event from the co­housing sector, The Foster Care Co­operative, Ex­cell, Mutual Advantage, London Rebuilding Society and Wessex Resolutions CIC. We would also like to thank a second group of respondents both from across England and Wales and from further afield. They include experts working in social co­operatives in Italy, France, Canada and Japan. These experts who have assisted this resarch are listed in Appendix 4. Their invaluable help in checking drafts, providing research reports and critical reading of this report made this Social Care review possible. We would also like to thank the groups in Wales who are now taking this work forward and in particular the path­ finding action by Welsh co­operative pioneers seeking to develop social co­operatives in Robert Owen’s home county of Powys. It is heartening that this research will find a supportive home there. We hope other parts of the UK will follow this lead. a Democratic Co-production Agenda for Care Services in the UK 3 Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2. Background: Crisis and opportunity ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]