DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Winners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2021 WINNERS Category 1 – Best News Story (at-large category) Silver Arrowhead Cooperative* Gold The Highline By Line Montana Electric Cooperatives’ Association Arrowhead Cooperative Mental Health Resources Available to Farmers [email protected] and Ranchers Ryan G. Hall Classification 2 [email protected] Gold Silver Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative Colorado Rural Electric Association NOEC’s NE Connection Protecting Vital Electric Lines When Wildfires Blaze Sarah Wilhelm Kylee Coleman [email protected] [email protected] Silver Category 2 – Best Feature Story (at-large category) Kauai Island Utility Cooperative KIUC Currents Gold Kauai Island Utility Cooperative Virginia, Maryland & Delaware Association [email protected] of Electric Cooperatives On the Outside, Looking In Classification 3 Steven Johnson [email protected] Gold United Cooperative Services Silver PowerTalk United Cooperative Services Minnkota Power Cooperative [email protected] Dinos, Drive-ins and Democracy Kaylee Cusack [email protected] Silver Sam Houston Electric Cooperative Category 3 – Best Column (at-large category) Sam Houston EC Local Pages Rachel Frey Gold [email protected] Virginia, Maryland & Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives Classification 4 Viewpoint - A Master Storyteller Richard Johnstone Gold [email protected] SLEMCO SLEMCO Power Silver Mary Laurent [email protected] Montana Electric Cooperatives’ Association What’s in a Name? Ryan G. Hall Silver [email protected] CoServ CoServ pages of Texas Co-op Power Magazine Category 4 – Best External News Publication Oscar Martinez [email protected] Classification 1 Gold Dakota Valley Electric Cooperative Dakota Valley News Dakota Valley Electric Cooperative [email protected] Classification 5 Silver Gold Rappahannock Electric Cooperative REC Powerlines – March, July and August issues Texas Electric Cooperatives Rappahannock Electric Cooperative Texas Co-op Power Magazine [email protected] Charles Lohrmann [email protected] Classification 5 Silver Gold Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives Texas Electric Cooperatives Oklahoma Living Magazine TEC Report Oklahoma Living Magazine Chris Burrows, Texas Electric Cooperatives [email protected] [email protected] Category 5 – Best Internal News Publication Silver Classification 1 Texas Electric Cooperatives Safety Watch Gold Tom Widlowski, Texas Electric Cooperatives Umatilla Electric Cooperative [email protected] “The Current” Employee Newsletter Jodie Thomas Category 6A Best Special Publication – Small [email protected] Classification 1 Classification 2 Silver Gold Southern Rivers Energy New Member Welcome Guide Aiken Electric Cooperative Kathryn Green WATTS On Line [email protected] Aiken Electric Cooperative [email protected] Classification 2 Silver Gold Appalachian Electric Cooperative Prairie Land Electric Cooperative, Inc.* The Hotline PLEC Benefits Flyer Becky Burks Deborah K. Anderson [email protected] [email protected] Classification 3 Silver Gold Kauai Island Utility Cooperative Anahola Service Center Singing River Electric Cooperative Shelley Paik Singing River Electric’s Online Newsletter [email protected] Lorri Freeman and Amanda Parker [email protected] Classification 3 Silver Gold Oklahoma Electric Cooperative Sam Houston Electric Cooperative OEC Quarterly Plug Board Election Ballot Booklet Brianna Wall Rachel Frey [email protected] [email protected] Classification 4 Classification 4 Gold Gold Flint Energies United Power Three Phase Tri-State Newsletter Insert Flint Energies Zach Kinder [email protected] [email protected] Silver Classification 4 CoServ Gold SmartHub: New Year. New Bill. New Account Number Phyllis Thomas Delaware Electric Cooperative [email protected] Delaware Living 2020 Jeremy Tucker Classification 5 [email protected] Gold Silver Indiana Electric Cooperatives Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative Parts of a Bucket Truck Infographic Biomass Booklet Stacey Holton Leslie Khamsivone [email protected] [email protected] Silver Classification 5 Dairyland Power Cooperative Gold Dairyland Power Cooperative’s 2019/2020 Sustainability Report Georgia System Operations Corporation Catherine Thomson Family of Companies Brochure [email protected] Beth Coffey [email protected] Category 6B Best Special Publication – Large Silver Classification 1 Northwest Public Power Association Silver NWPPA: Who We Are Brochure Brenda Dunn Southern Rivers Energy [email protected] Social Media Playbook Kathryn Green Category 7 – Best Annual Report to Members [email protected] Classification 1 Classification 2 Gold Gold Garkane Energy Northeastern REMC* Purposeful Planning + Disciplined Planning COVID-19 Response Internal/External - = Financial Strength Northeastern REMC Garkane Energy Christy Phend & Chris Todd [email protected] [email protected] Silver Silver SEMO Electric Cooperative Delta-Montrose Electric Association 2020 Annual Report DMEA Member Handbook Team SEMO Laura Sanders [email protected] [email protected] Classification 2 Classification 3 Gold Silver Delta-Montrose Electric Association Oklahoma Electric Cooperative 2019 DMEA Annual Report Get Charged! Elementary STEAM Education Laura Sanders Tory Tedder-Loffland [email protected] [email protected] Silver MiEnergy Cooperative Driving Change 2019 Annual Report MiEnergy Cooperative [email protected] Classification 3 Silver Gold Tricounty Rural Electric Cooperative Who Are We? Meet Your Community Co-op East Central Energy Tricounty REC 2019 ECE Annual Report: Energy to Keep [email protected] You Moving Jenny Long Classification 2 [email protected] Gold Silver Northeastern REMC* Baldwin EMC Director Candidate Training Baldwin EMC’s 2019 Annual Report Tennille Merkle, Chris Todd Baldwin EMC [email protected] [email protected] Silver (tie) Classification 4 Four County Electric Gold Co-ops Vote Video Four County EMC United Power [email protected] Charging Forward - 2019 Annual Report United Power Communications Team Wake Electric Membership Corporation [email protected] Wake Electric’s New Website Rachael Benedict Silver [email protected] Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative NOVEC 2020 Annual Report Classification 3 Leslie Khamsivone & Priscilla Knight [email protected] Gold (tie) Flathead Electric Classification 5 Plan Before You Plant Flathead Electric Gold [email protected] Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Year in Review GVEC Alicia Doran GVEC Unplugged Podcast [email protected] GVEC [email protected] Silver East Kentucky Power Cooperative Silver (tie) East Kentucky Power Cooperative Annual Report: South Plains Electric Cooperative Preparation. Strength. Resilience Youth Tour Spotlight Series Member Services South Plains Electric Cooperative [email protected] [email protected] Category 8. Most Innovative Use Ozarks Electric Cooperative of Digital Communication Thank You Ozarks Electric Cooperative Classification 1 [email protected] Gold Classification 4 Firelands Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2020 Lineman Appreciation Week videos Gold Tracy Gibb Pedernales Electric Cooperative [email protected] Welcome to the Cooperative Christopher J. Martinez [email protected] Silver Classification 3 CoServ Gold As A Meter Of Fact Oscar Martinez Farmers EC [email protected] Teleworking Jim Nimmo Classification 5 [email protected] Gold Silver Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives Farmers EC OAEC Website Farmers HR Insurance Plan Options Recap Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives Jim Nimmo [email protected] [email protected] Silver Classification 4 Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives Co-op Impact Videos Gold Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives United Power [email protected] Finance Video, Annual Meeting United Power Communications Team Category 9. Best Use of Social Media [email protected] (at-large category) Silver Gold Shenandoah Valley Electric Cooperative Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative Shenandoah Valley Electric Cooperative “Spirit Alyssa’s Energy Tip Tuesday of SVEC” Video Alyssa Dussetschleger Shenandoah Valley Electric Cooperative [email protected] [email protected] Silver Classification 5 GreyStone Power Tropical Storm Zeta: Social media response Gold Amanda Busby Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative [email protected] We Work for You Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative Category 10. Best Digital Storytelling [email protected] Classification 1 Silver Gold East River Electric Power Cooperative Powering Your Safety Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative East River Electric Power Cooperative Hope Isn’t Cancelled [email protected] Samantha Kuhn [email protected] Category 11. Best Photo (at-large category) Silver Gold Riverland Energy Cooperative SLEMCO License to Live Safety Video Picking Up The Pieces - A Lineman’s Point of View Ben Bella Jonathan Hebert - Lineman Class A [email protected] [email protected] Classification 2 Silver (tie) Silver Flathead Electric White River Valley Electric Cooperative Sunset in the Flathead Valley Proposed 2020 Bylaw Amendments Sharilyn Fairweather White River Valley Electric [email protected] [email protected] Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative Classification 4 Clean Up Don Johnson Gold (tie) [email protected] Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative 2020
Recommended publications
  • The COVID-19 Outbreak Update from Legacoop, Italy

    The COVID-19 Outbreak Update from Legacoop, Italy

    The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399... Advancing social justice, promoting decent work ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy This update provide insights on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Italian cooperative enterprises, and measures being taken by them to support workers, members/customers, and people in their communities affected by the crisis. News | 27 March 2020 "We are women and men cooperators who are present right alongside the doctors and nurses, keeping hospitals clean, operating in supermarkets, offices, warehouses, kitchens and thermal power plants. We are the ones working in social cooperatives to keep assistance alive for populations that were already vulnerable before the pandemic and are even more so after.” - Mauro Lusetti, President, Legacoop The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted life dramatically in Italy. On 25 March there were 74,386 confirmed cases with 7,503 deaths and 9,362 recoveries. The stringent measures adopted by the Italian Government, needed to slow down and contain the virus, have had seriously detrimental consequences for enterprises in the country. Regarding cooperative enterprises, if the emergency situation and the measures around the coronavirus pandemic continue for a longer period, it is expected that workers at risk could reach at least 265,000. This estimate is based on the number of workers and worker members in cooperatives in a number of key sectors, including: Social cooperatives pointed out that 200,000 workers could be at risk only in their sector, as they are precluded from carrying out activities of general interest, such as taking care of elderly and disabled people due to the closure of day centres, or interruption of home care, as well as 1 sur 4 17/04/2020 à 10:43 The COVID-19 outbreak update from Legacoop, Italy https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/news/WCMS_7399..
  • Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region

    Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region

    Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Models, work and employment, ecosystem and public policies International Cooperative Alliance Asia and Pacific & 9, Aradhana Enclave +91-11-26888067 ica-asia and pacific Sector-13, R. K. Puram International Organisation of the Industrial and Service Cooperatives New Delhi-110066 +91-11-26888250 icaapac [email protected] icaasiapacific ica-ap.coop Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Table of contents List of tables iv List of figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iv Abbreviations and acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Synthesis note 1 Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2 The scope of target types of the present study ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 3 Method����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2 ‘Type’ and ‘model’�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
  • Literatures a Color

    Literatures a Color

    Study on the social enterprises ecosystem in Emilia-Romagna RaiSE Enhancing social enterprises competitiveness through improved business support policies This publication only reflects the author’s views. The programme authorities are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Contents Summary 1. Definition and Criteria in the regional context 2. Characteristics and development of social enterprises 3. Needs assessment and main challenges for scaling social enterprises 4. Ecosystem of business support tools and instruments 5. Gap analysis and policy recommendations Annex 1 Interview Grid Annex 2 Summary of the Interviews Bibliography Sitography – enterprises involved in the mapping 1 SUMMARY This research project was carried out within the framework of the European RaiSE Interreg Europe project, whose objective is to improve regional policy instruments for the competitiveness and sustainability of social enterprises. The development agencies involved in the project - from Emilia-Romagna, Catalonia, Ireland, Scotland, Hungary (Budapest) and Orebro (Sweden) - mapped the economy and social entrepreneurship ecosystems in their respective regional contexts, bringing out a highly varied and interesting scenario. ERVET internal working group, in charge of mapping and analysing the needs of the Emilia-Romagna social cooperatives and enterprises, involved the regional project stakeholders (Emilia-Romagna Region, Legacoop, Confcooperative, AGCI, Forum del Terzo Settore, Aster, ANCI). These contributed to identifying the survey sample whilest AICCON (Italian Association for the Promotion of the Culture of Cooperation and Non Profit) supported the work from the scientific point of view. Chapter 1 of the research report outlines the framework for social enterprises starting from the definition given by the European Commission and describes the social economy context in Emilia-Romagna.
  • Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals

    Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals

    Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals By Johnston Birchall Cooperative Branch & Policy Integration Department International Labour Office, Geneva Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives Copyright © International Labour Organization 2004 First published 2004 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP 9HE (Fax: +44 171436 3986), in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Centre, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 (Fax: +1 508 750 4470), or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Birchall, Johnston Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals Geneva, International Labour Office, 2004 ISBN 92-2-116148-X The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
  • 2010 Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission I

    2010 Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission I

    2010 Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Staff Report Federal Energy Regulatory Commission February 2011 The opinions and views expressed in this staff report do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, its Chairman, or individual Commissioners, and are not binding on the Commission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Staff Team Dean Wight, Team Lead Caroline Daly David Kathan Michael P. Lee Kamaria Martin Pamela Silberstein Michael Tita Rebecca Vertes Z, INC. Team Bryan Templeton (Z, INC.) Valerie Richardson (KEMA) Will Gifford (KEMA) Christopher Elsner (Z, INC.) Matthew S. Pettit (KEMA) Geoff Barker (KEMA) Ron Chebra (KEMA) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. 1 Results of the 2010 Advanced Metering and Demand Response Survey............................. 1 Demand Response Developments and Barriers.................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 Prior Reports in This Series .................................................................................................. 2 Preparation of This Year’s Report ........................................................................................ 3 Demand Response and Advanced Metering Survey............................................................
  • Handbook on Cooperatives for Use by Workers' Organizations

    Handbook on Cooperatives for Use by Workers' Organizations

    Handbook on Cooperatives for use by Workers’ Organizations Guy Tchami Cooperative Programme International Labour Office Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2007 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected]], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. ILO / Guy Tchami Handbook on cooperatives for use of Workers’ Organizations (Geneva), International Labour Office, (2007) Translated in English by Joan S. Macdonald ISBN 978-92-2-115655-0 Also available in French : Manuel sur les coopératives à l’usage des organisation de travailleurs, (ISBN 92-2-215655-2) Geneva, (2006) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
  • Worker Cooperatives in Japan

    Worker Cooperatives in Japan

    MASS-SPECC Chairperson’s and Managers’ Forum July 5th 2019 in Cagayan de Oro City, the Philippines. Worker Cooperatives in Japan Japan Workers’ Co-operative Union (JWCU) Board Member / International Relations Officer Osamu Nakano International Co-operative Alliance (ICA) Founded: 1895 President: Ariel Guarco (Argentine Republic) Member Countries/Organizations: 109 / 312 (2019) Regional Offices: Africa, Americas, Asia and Pacific, Europe Sectors: International Cooperative Agricultural Organization International Cooperative Banking Association Consumer Cooperatives Worldwide International Cooperative Fisheries Organization International Health Cooperative Organization Cooperative Housing International International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation International Organization of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers’ Cooperatives (CICOPA) 2 Member individuals/coops: 1.2 Billion / 3 Million 300 largest co-operatives had a combined annual turn-over of $2.2 trillion USD. Cooperatives generate partial or full-time employment for at least 280 million individuals worldwide, either in or within the scope of co-operatives, making up almost 12% of the entire employed population of G20 countries. United Nations estimates that cooperatives support the livelihoods of almost half of the total global population. The Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives (COPAC) : UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs/DESA, Food and Agriculture Organization/FAO, International Labour Organization (Cooperative Unit),
  • Industrial and Service Cooperatives 2013 - 2014 Index

    Industrial and Service Cooperatives 2013 - 2014 Index

    GLOBAL REPORT INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES 2013 2014 GLOBAL REPORT ON INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES 2013 - 2014 INDEX Copyright © 2015, CICOPA Graphic design: Juan J. Burgos Marqués INTRODUCTORY NOTE 7 FACTS AND FIGURES ABOUT INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE COOPERATIVES AROUND THE WORLD 9 EVOLUTION, DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED AND SOLUTIONS FOUND WITHIN OUR NETWORK 19 OUR NETWORK: CICOPA MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS WORLDWIDE 29 5 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This is the first global biannual report on industrial and service cooperatives and their representative institutions. It is the result of two different surveys carried out among CICOPA’s members during the first half of 2014, which were eventually updated: each of these two surveys is at the origin of the following two sections which, together, are aimed at providing a picture of our cooperative sector in the world. As we will examine in the following pages, the close to 65,000 enterprises that are directly part of our world network as affiliates of CICOPA member organizations employ over 3 million people. However, according to material collected during our recent inter-sectoral study Cooperatives and Employment: a Global Report1, released at the International Summit of Cooperatives in Quebec in October 2014, there is evidence that this world phenomenon is quantitatively much wider: worker cooperatives, social cooperatives and cooperatives of self-employed producers in industry and services together employ over 16 million people worldwide. The vast majority of these persons are members and, therefore, the owners of their enterprise, which they jointly and democratically control. The cooperatives in our network are involved in a very wide array of industrial and service sectors, from mechanical industries to cultural centres, from schools to nano-technologies, from construction to health care.
  • Promoting Cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece Sep

    Promoting Cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece Sep

    International Organisation of Industrial, Artisanal and Service Producers’ Cooperatives A sectoral organisation of the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) Promoting cooperatives and the Social Economy in Greece _____________________________________________ How to promote the social economy in Greece through social cooperatives, worker cooperatives, and cooperatives of artisans and of SMEs Final report to the ILO September 9, 2013 1 2 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Introduction by Bruno Roelants, CICOPA Secretary General 5 PART 1. THE SITUATION IN GREECE 7 1.1. The s ocial impact of the crisis 7 1.2. Evolution and s tate o f the art of cooperatives and the social economy in Greece 9 1.3. Analysis of the existing relevant legislation 15 PART 2. MAIN RELEVANT NATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN THE CICOPA NETWORK THAT COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE GREEK CONTEXT 20 2.1. T he CICOPA network 20 2.2 Social services, with a special focus on crèches and homes for the elderly 22 2.3 . Business transfers to the employees under the worker cooperative form 25 2.4. Cooperatives among artisans, profess ionals and micro -enterprises 31 2. 5. The production of renewable energy by cooperatives 33 2. 6. Constitution of cooperative incubators 35 2. 7. Financial instruments for the development of cooperatives 36 2.8 . Constitution of networks, groups and consor tia 41 2. 9. Worker and social cooperatives in rural contexts 46 2.1 0. Multi -stakeholder cooperatives 49 2.1 1. Mixed and transitional forms of cooperatives 50 2.1 2. Cooperatives and emerging sectors: tourism 51 2.1 3. Worker coop eratives dealing with specific social challenges 53 PART 3.
  • Co-Op Sprouts from Grass Roots

    Co-Op Sprouts from Grass Roots

    Rural COOPERATIVESCOOPERATIVESJanuary/February 2016 Co-op Sprouts from Grass Roots Commentary VAPG program can be a good fit for co-ops By Sam Rikkers, Administrator Noteworthy in this article is an additional motivation Rural Business Cooperative Service behind the creation of the co-op: the members’ desire to help USDA Rural Development create jobs and generate economic stimulus in rural areas of the state where the economic recovery has been slow to Regular readers of this magazine are likely reach. Commitment to bettering the communities of their well aware of USDA’s commitment to members is a core belief behind the cooperative movement, cooperative education and its role in which is well evidenced by this co-op. Equally laudatory is promoting the use of cooperative businesses the co-op’s commitment to helping hired farmworkers make as a way to strengthen the rural economy. the transition to farm owners and co-op members. USDA Rural Development also manages a number of That article is followed by another that provides a look at financial programs that can help producer cooperatives, one a recent VAPG award which helped launch a much-needed of which is the Value-Added Producer Grants (VAPG) processing alternative for small- and medium-sized chicken program. producers in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley area. Since the VAPG program was launched in 2001, it has VAPGs are awarded through a national competition, and provided cooperatives and other producer-owned businesses — in most years — USDA receives many more applications across the nation and U.S. territories with more than $308 than we have funds for.
  • Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting

    Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting

    Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting This alphabetized list of TRI Reporting Year (RY) 2010 Parent Company names is provided here as a reference for facilities filing their RY 2011 reports using paper forms. For RY2011, the Agency is emphasizing the importance of accurate names for Parent Companies. Your facility may or may not have a Parent Company. Also, if you do have a Parent Company, please note that it is not necessarily listed here. Instructions Search for your standardized company name by pressing the CTRL+F keys. If your Parent Company is on this list, please write the name exactly as spelled and abbreviated here in Section 5.1 of the appropriate TRI Reporting Form. If your Parent Company is not on this list, please clearly write out the name of your parent company. In either case, please use ALL CAPITAL letters and DO NOT use periods. Please consult the most recent TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions (http://www.epa.gov/tri/report/index.htm) if you need additional information on reporting for reporting Parent Company names. Find your standardized company name on the alphabetical list below, or search for a name by pressing the CTRL+F keys Standardized Parent Company Names 3A COMPOSITES USA INC 3M CO 4-D CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC 50% DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA 50% PRAIRIE FARM 88TH REGIONAL SUPPORT COMMAND A & A MANUFACTURING CO INC A & A READY MIX INC A & E INC A G SIMPSON AUTOMOTIVE INC A KEY 3 CASTING CO A MATRIX METALS CO LLC A O SMITH CORP A RAYMOND TINNERMAN MANUFACTURING INC A SCHULMAN INC A TEICHERT
  • 2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential

    2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential

    2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential (Data from forms EIA-861- schedules 4A & 4D and EIA-861S) Customers Sales Revenues (Thousands Average Price Entity State Ownership (Count) (Megawatthours) Dollars) (cents/kWh) Akiachak Native Community Electric AK Cooperative 183 654 305.1 46.65 Alaska Electric Light&Power Co AK Investor Owned 14,793 143,208 20,309.5 14.18 Alaska Power and Telephone Co AK Investor Owned 5,631 25,514 7,720.0 30.26 Alaska Village Elec Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 8,065 41,117 21,366.4 51.96 Anchorage Municipal Light and Power AK Municipal 24,721 115,730 26,832.6 23.19 Aniak Light & Power Co Inc AK Investor Owned 170 785 480.0 61.15 Barrow Utils & Elec Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 1,540 10,909 1,689.6 15.49 Chitina Electric Inc AK Investor Owned 43 100 70.8 70.80 Chugach Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 71,794 467,384 98,888.4 21.16 City & Borough of Sitka - (AK) AK Municipal 3,798 39,570 7,352.0 18.58 City of Akutan - (AK) AK Municipal 83 530 424.3 80.06 City of Chefornak AK Municipal 97 551 306.0 55.54 City of Chignik - (AK) AK Municipal 55 274 153.0 55.84 City of Elfin Cove - (AK) AK Municipal 47 115 80.0 69.57 City of Larsen Bay - (AK) AK Municipal 51 320 73.9 23.09 City of Ouzinkie - (AK) AK Municipal 77 244 163.0 66.80 City of Saint Paul AK Municipal 136 657 270.0 41.10 City of Tenakee Springs - (AK) AK Municipal 125 236 138.8 58.81 City of Unalaska - (AK) AK Municipal 755 3,658 1,507.3 41.21 City of White Mountain - (AK) AK Municipal 67 252 138.3 54.88 City of Wrangell - (AK) AK Municipal 1,206 13,930 1,592.0