DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential 2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential (Data from forms EIA-861- schedules 4A & 4D and EIA-861S) Customers Sales Revenues (Thousands Average Price Entity State Ownership (Count) (Megawatthours) Dollars) (cents/kWh) Akiachak Native Community Electric AK Cooperative 183 654 305.1 46.65 Alaska Electric Light&Power Co AK Investor Owned 14,793 143,208 20,309.5 14.18 Alaska Power and Telephone Co AK Investor Owned 5,631 25,514 7,720.0 30.26 Alaska Village Elec Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 8,065 41,117 21,366.4 51.96 Anchorage Municipal Light and Power AK Municipal 24,721 115,730 26,832.6 23.19 Aniak Light & Power Co Inc AK Investor Owned 170 785 480.0 61.15 Barrow Utils & Elec Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 1,540 10,909 1,689.6 15.49 Chitina Electric Inc AK Investor Owned 43 100 70.8 70.80 Chugach Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 71,794 467,384 98,888.4 21.16 City & Borough of Sitka - (AK) AK Municipal 3,798 39,570 7,352.0 18.58 City of Akutan - (AK) AK Municipal 83 530 424.3 80.06 City of Chefornak AK Municipal 97 551 306.0 55.54 City of Chignik - (AK) AK Municipal 55 274 153.0 55.84 City of Elfin Cove - (AK) AK Municipal 47 115 80.0 69.57 City of Larsen Bay - (AK) AK Municipal 51 320 73.9 23.09 City of Ouzinkie - (AK) AK Municipal 77 244 163.0 66.80 City of Saint Paul AK Municipal 136 657 270.0 41.10 City of Tenakee Springs - (AK) AK Municipal 125 236 138.8 58.81 City of Unalaska - (AK) AK Municipal 755 3,658 1,507.3 41.21 City of White Mountain - (AK) AK Municipal 67 252 138.3 54.88 City of Wrangell - (AK) AK Municipal 1,206 13,930 1,592.0 11.43 Copper Valley Elec Assn, Inc AK Cooperative 3,009 16,120 4,106.9 25.48 Cordova Electric Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 960 4,667 1,695.9 36.34 G & K, Inc AK Investor Owned 68 286 179.6 62.80 Galena Electric Utility AK Municipal 107 843 499.4 59.24 Gold Country Energy AK Investor Owned 129 247 167.0 67.61 Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc AK Cooperative 39,511 267,590 70,309.0 26.27 Homer Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 27,960 161,043 43,419.4 26.96 Hughes Power & Light Co AK Investor Owned 35 180 128.0 71.11 I-N-N Electric Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 178 740 492.6 66.57 Igiugig Electric Company AK Political Subdivision 30 94 85.1 90.53 Inside Passage Elec Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 1,089 4,238 2,665.0 62.88 Ipnatchiaq Electric Company AK Municipal 50 247 166.4 67.37 Ketchikan Public Utilities AK Municipal 6,509 69,028 7,795.7 11.29 Kodiak Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 4,841 34,663 6,017.0 17.36 Kokhanok Village Council AK Political Subdivision 59 175 157.8 90.17 Kotzebue Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 1,174 7,335 2,885.2 39.33 Kuiggluum Kallugvia AK Investor Owned 185 763 411.8 53.97 Kwig Power Company AK Political Subdivision 84 523 319.2 61.03 Matanuska Electric Assn Inc AK Cooperative 59,283 416,735 89,718.3 21.53 McGrath Light & Power Co AK Investor Owned 192 507 397.2 78.34 Metlakatla Power & Light AK Municipal 679 7,404 1,087.0 14.68 Middle Kuskokwim Elec Coop Inc AK Cooperative 119 302 384.9 127.45 Napakiak Ircinraq Power Co AK Investor Owned 131 600 315.0 52.50 Nome Joint Utility Systems AK Municipal 1,744 8,483 3,237.0 38.16 North Slope Borough Power & Light AK Municipal 755 6,542 1,107.6 16.93 Nushagak Electric Coop, Inc AK Cooperative 986 5,053 2,293.5 45.39 Pedro Bay Village Council - (AK) AK Municipal 23 47 38.0 80.85 Pelican Utility AK Municipal 74 290 100.0 34.48 Petersburg Borough - (AK) AK Municipal 1,391 21,248 2,168.0 10.20 TDX Manley Generating LLC AK Investor Owned 81 156 171.0 109.62 Tanana Power Co Inc AK Investor Owned 108 306 215.9 70.56 Tatitlek Electric Utility AK Municipal 40 125 116.0 92.80 Tuntutuliak Comm Services Assn AK Cooperative 135 474 308.1 65.00 Unalakleet Valley Elec Coop AK Cooperative 273 1,302 618.0 47.47 Alabama Power Co AL Investor Owned 1,280,955 18,264,230 2,448,683.0 13.41 Albertville Municipal Utilities Board AL Municipal 8,065 121,847 11,979.0 9.83 Arab Electric Coop Inc AL Cooperative 12,827 196,202 21,523.0 10.97 Baldwin County El Member Corp AL Cooperative 71,372 977,611 115,056.0 11.77 Black Warrior Elec Member Corp AL Cooperative 20,080 272,864 29,842.2 10.94 Central Alabama Electric Coop AL Cooperative 41,920 602,040 80,041.0 13.29 Cherokee Electric Coop AL Cooperative 17,604 245,530 32,735.0 13.33 City of Alexander City AL Municipal 4,983 56,011 5,725.0 10.22 City of Andalusia AL Municipal 3,632 43,116 5,625.0 13.05 City of Athens - (AL) AL Municipal 41,017 668,834 67,625.0 10.11 City of Bessemer Utilities AL Municipal 9,361 118,972 12,947.0 10.88 City of Brundidge - (AL) AL Municipal 1,020 11,682 1,393.1 11.93 City of Courtland AL Municipal 584 7,842 804.0 10.25 2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential (Data from forms EIA-861- schedules 4A & 4D and EIA-861S) Customers Sales Revenues (Thousands Average Price Entity State Ownership (Count) (Megawatthours) Dollars) (cents/kWh) City of Dothan - (AL) AL Municipal 25,773 391,265 37,131.0 9.49 City of Elba - (AL) AL Municipal 1,200 14,792 2,186.0 14.78 City of Evergreen - (AL) AL Municipal 1,477 18,754 1,918.0 10.23 City of Fairhope - (AL) AL Municipal 5,919 79,783 8,932.0 11.20 City of Florence - (AL) AL Municipal 40,811 632,742 67,115.0 10.61 City of Hartford - (AL) AL Municipal 1,268 17,428 1,955.0 11.22 City of Hartselle AL Municipal 4,318 62,911 6,710.0 10.67 City of Huntsville - (AL) AL Municipal 165,804 2,538,225 259,978.0 10.24 City of Lafayette - (AL) AL Municipal 1,232 13,879 814.0 5.86 City of Lanett - (AL) AL Municipal 3,014 40,099 3,853.0 9.61 City of Luverne - (AL) AL Municipal 1,533 20,877 1,580.0 7.57 City of Muscle Shoals AL Municipal 6,557 101,775 10,541.0 10.36 City of Opelika - (AL) AL Municipal 11,018 143,404 17,181.0 11.98 City of Opp - (AL) AL Municipal 2,655 34,540 2,965.0 8.58 City of Piedmont - (AL) AL Municipal 1,756 20,476 2,687.0 13.12 City of Robertsdale AL Municipal 2,765 38,481 4,669.0 12.13 City of Russellville - (AL) AL Municipal 3,970 51,591 6,190.0 12.00 City of Scottsboro AL Municipal 6,819 98,274 11,248.0 11.45 City of Tarrant AL Municipal 2,157 30,349 3,777.0 12.45 City of Troy - (AL) AL Municipal 6,510 98,001 9,420.0 9.61 City of Tuscumbia AL Municipal 3,957 53,761 5,845.0 10.87 City of Tuskegee AL Municipal 5,836 61,923 8,258.0 13.34 Clarke-Washington E M C AL Cooperative 18,361 223,976 28,536.0 12.74 Coosa Valley Electric Coop Inc AL Cooperative 14,388 214,611 27,972.0 13.03 Covington Electric Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 22,033 305,523 43,319.0 14.18 Cullman Electric Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 36,225 551,483 64,894.0 11.77 Cullman Power Board AL Municipal 6,787 89,879 10,053.0 11.19 Decatur Utilities AL Municipal 22,584 330,790 32,916.0 9.95 Diverse Power Incorporated AL Cooperative 567 7,621 1,215.6 15.95 Dixie Electric Coop AL Cooperative 20,403 307,035 36,717.0 11.96 Foley Board of Utilities AL Municipal 42,578 644,682 76,099.0 11.80 Fort Payne Improvement Authority AL Municipal 6,617 94,525 10,253.0 10.85 Franklin Electric Coop - (AL) AL Cooperative 5,736 78,301 9,518.0 12.16 Guntersville Electric Board AL Municipal 4,743 71,959 7,713.0 10.72 Joe Wheeler Elec Member Corp AL Cooperative 35,191 592,443 70,624.0 11.92 Marshall-De Kalb Electric Coop AL Cooperative 16,311 245,220 27,260.0 11.12 North Alabama Electric Coop AL Cooperative 12,792 196,590 22,442.0 11.42 Pea River Electric Coop AL Cooperative 14,669 211,658 26,031.9 12.30 Pioneer Electric Coop, Inc - (AL) AL Cooperative 11,934 146,400 24,357.0 16.64 Sand Mountain Electric Coop AL Cooperative 25,570 366,181 42,123.0 11.50 Sheffield Utilities AL Municipal 15,311 235,297 26,117.0 11.10 Singing River Elec Cooperative AL Cooperative 321 4,526 510.3 11.27 South Alabama Elec Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 15,923 224,301 29,607.0 13.20 Southern Pine Elec Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 19,806 259,780 29,965.0 11.53 Sylacauga Utilities Board AL Municipal 5,213 75,502 7,404.3 9.81 Tallapoosa River Elec Coop Inc AL Cooperative 26,595 379,027 43,442.0 11.46 Tombigbee Electric Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 8,095 96,298 13,131.0 13.64 Wiregrass Electric Coop, Inc AL Cooperative 20,903 311,927 40,030.3 12.83 Arkansas Valley Elec Coop Corp AR Cooperative 51,385 774,904 81,942.5 10.57 Ashley Chicot Elec Coop, Inc AR Cooperative 4,258 55,849 6,435.0 11.52 C & L Electric Coop Corp AR Cooperative 19,736 259,275 28,739.0 11.08 Carroll Electric Coop Corp - (AR) AR Cooperative 84,700 1,217,809 116,258.0 9.55 City Water and Light Plant AR Municipal 32,535 502,889 31,498.0 6.26 City of Augusta - (AR) AR Municipal 776 8,161 914.0 11.20 City of Benton - (AR) AR Municipal 12,206 148,739 15,433.8 10.38 City of Bentonville - (AR) AR Municipal 21,641 250,655 29,387.0 11.72 City of Hope AR Municipal 5,784 68,068 6,901.7 10.14 City of North Little Rock - (AR) AR Municipal 33,875 372,798 40,902.0 10.97 City of Osceola - (AR) AR Municipal 2,874 39,652 4,195.0 10.58 City of Paris - (AR) AR Municipal 1,621 19,936 1,886.0 9.46 City of Piggott - (AR) AR Municipal 1,808 19,392 2,284.3 11.78 City of Prescott - (AR) AR Municipal 1,350 13,146 1,338.7 10.18 City of Siloam Springs - (AR) AR Municipal 6,942 72,432 7,639.0 10.55 City of West Memphis - (AR) AR Municipal 10,310 160,188 11,260.0 7.03 Clarksville Light & Water Co AR Municipal 3,830 45,539 3,865.0 8.49 Clay County Electric Coop Corp AR Cooperative 10,400 110,842 16,032.5 14.46 Conway Corporation AR Municipal 28,016 346,499 22,721.6 6.56 Craighead Electric Coop Corp AR Cooperative 23,810 384,120 37,663.0 9.81 2019 Utility Bundled Retail Sales- Residential (Data from forms EIA-861- schedules 4A & 4D and EIA-861S) Customers Sales Revenues (Thousands Average Price Entity State Ownership (Count)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Residential Customer Attrition at TXU Accelerates Duke Energy Says It Is
    August 5, 2009 Residential Customer Attrition at TXU Accelerates TXU Energy continued to lose residential customers in the second quarter, which eventually prompted a price reduction last week, parent Energy Futures Holdings said during an earnings call. While margins remain in TXU's 5-10% target, the retailer had seen in the second quarter a temporary expansion in margins from lower wholesale pricing, followed by pressure on margins as retail prices across the market fell. As of June 30, 2009, TXU served 1.911 million residential meters. While up from 1.880 million a year ago, the total is down from 1.930 million as of March 31, 2009. Although TXU said the second quarter represented the first net attrition in residential customers in seven quarters, the numbers of residential meters reported in its 10K/Q's show the decline began in the first quarter. The rate of residential churn increased from a loss of 2,000 meters from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, to a loss of 19,000 residential meters from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009. Small business customer meters (< 1 MW) continued to grow, ending the quarter at 279,000 versus 275,000 as of March 31, 2009. Large commercial meters fell to 21,000 from 24,000 as of March 31, 2009. Total retail sales were up 1.3% at 12,543 GWh, driven by year-over-year residential and small commercial customer growth. Year-over-year residential sales were up 2.1% at 7,084 GWh and small commercial sales were up 2.2% at 1,908 GWh.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals
    Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals By Johnston Birchall Cooperative Branch & Policy Integration Department International Labour Office, Geneva Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives Copyright © International Labour Organization 2004 First published 2004 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP 9HE (Fax: +44 171436 3986), in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Centre, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 (Fax: +1 508 750 4470), or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Birchall, Johnston Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals Geneva, International Labour Office, 2004 ISBN 92-2-116148-X The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission I
    2010 Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Staff Report Federal Energy Regulatory Commission February 2011 The opinions and views expressed in this staff report do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, its Chairman, or individual Commissioners, and are not binding on the Commission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Staff Team Dean Wight, Team Lead Caroline Daly David Kathan Michael P. Lee Kamaria Martin Pamela Silberstein Michael Tita Rebecca Vertes Z, INC. Team Bryan Templeton (Z, INC.) Valerie Richardson (KEMA) Will Gifford (KEMA) Christopher Elsner (Z, INC.) Matthew S. Pettit (KEMA) Geoff Barker (KEMA) Ron Chebra (KEMA) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. 1 Results of the 2010 Advanced Metering and Demand Response Survey............................. 1 Demand Response Developments and Barriers.................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 Prior Reports in This Series .................................................................................................. 2 Preparation of This Year’s Report ........................................................................................ 3 Demand Response and Advanced Metering Survey............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vistra Energy Corp
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 — OR — ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __ to __ Commission File Number 001-38086 Vistra Energy Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 36-4833255 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6555 Sierra Drive, Irving, Texas 75039 (214) 812-4600 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common stock, par value $0.01 per share VST New York Stock Exchange Warrants VST.WS.A New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Cooperatives for Use by Workers' Organizations
    Handbook on Cooperatives for use by Workers’ Organizations Guy Tchami Cooperative Programme International Labour Office Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2007 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected]], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. ILO / Guy Tchami Handbook on cooperatives for use of Workers’ Organizations (Geneva), International Labour Office, (2007) Translated in English by Joan S. Macdonald ISBN 978-92-2-115655-0 Also available in French : Manuel sur les coopératives à l’usage des organisation de travailleurs, (ISBN 92-2-215655-2) Geneva, (2006) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • New Settlement on Firstenergy ESP Allows Gov't Aggregators to Be Paid
    March 2, 2009 New Settlement on FirstEnergy ESP Allows Gov't Aggregators to be Paid Uncollectibles A revised stipulation which would establish the FirstEnergy Ohio utilities' electric security plan would allow suppliers of governmental aggregations to collect unpaid receivables from the FirstEnergy utilities, if providers elect to provide customers with rate phase-in credits, in a provision which prompted the Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council (NOPEC) and Ohio Consumers' Counsel to sign the settlement (Matters, 2/20/09). The OCC said the amended stipulation will, "remove competitive barriers to aggregation." The revised stipulation amends the original process for governmental aggregators to elect to provide rate phase-in credits to their customers, should PUCO order a phasing-in of Standard Service Offer rates. As before, governmental aggregation suppliers providing the phase-in credit would be entitled to receive such credits on a deferred basis from the FirstEnergy utilities, which would add such credits to the regulatory assets created for Standard Service Offer customers. Such credits would be recovered on a nonbypassable basis. Additionally, the settling parties now agree that any uncollectible government aggregation receivables arising out of supplying generation and transmission to a government aggregation group electing to phase-in prices as approved by the Commission shall be included in the Continued Page 7 WMECO Revises Renewable Access Plan to Remove Limit on Number of Suppliers In response to criticism from REC brokers, Western Massachusetts Electric Company has amended its proposed renewable energy retail access plan at the Massachusetts DPU, removing a previous provision limiting participation to two suppliers (08-54).
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File of Data Source
    Members List U.S. Investor-Owned Electric Companies International Members Associate Members EEI is the association that represents all U.S. investor-owned electric companies. Our members provide electricity for 220 million Americans, operate in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and directly and indirectly employ more than one million workers. Safe, reliable, affordable, and clean energy powers the economy and enhances the lives of all Americans. Organized in 1933, EEI provides public policy leadership, strategic business intelligence, and essential meetings and forums. U.S. Investor-Owned Utilities AES Corporation Emera Maine OGE Energy Corporation Dayton Power & Light Company Empire District Electric Company Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company Indianapolis Power & Light Company Entergy Corporation Ohio Valley Electric Corporation ALLETE Entergy Arkansas Oncor Minnesota Power Entergy Louisiana Otter Tail Corporation Superior Water, Light and Power Company Entergy Mississippi Otter Tail Power Company Alliant Energy Corporation Entergy New Orleans PG&E Corporation Ameren Corporation Entergy Texas Pacific Gas & Electric Company Ameren Illinois Eversource Energy Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Ameren Missouri Exelon Corporation Arizona Public Service Company American Electric Power Baltimore Gas & Electric Company PNM Resources AEP Ohio Commonwealth Edison Company PNM AEP Texas PECO Energy Company TNMP Appalachian Power Pepco Holdings Portland General Electric Indiana Michigan Pepco PPL Corporation Kentucky Power Atlantic City Electric
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting
    Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting This alphabetized list of TRI Reporting Year (RY) 2010 Parent Company names is provided here as a reference for facilities filing their RY 2011 reports using paper forms. For RY2011, the Agency is emphasizing the importance of accurate names for Parent Companies. Your facility may or may not have a Parent Company. Also, if you do have a Parent Company, please note that it is not necessarily listed here. Instructions Search for your standardized company name by pressing the CTRL+F keys. If your Parent Company is on this list, please write the name exactly as spelled and abbreviated here in Section 5.1 of the appropriate TRI Reporting Form. If your Parent Company is not on this list, please clearly write out the name of your parent company. In either case, please use ALL CAPITAL letters and DO NOT use periods. Please consult the most recent TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions (http://www.epa.gov/tri/report/index.htm) if you need additional information on reporting for reporting Parent Company names. Find your standardized company name on the alphabetical list below, or search for a name by pressing the CTRL+F keys Standardized Parent Company Names 3A COMPOSITES USA INC 3M CO 4-D CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC 50% DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA 50% PRAIRIE FARM 88TH REGIONAL SUPPORT COMMAND A & A MANUFACTURING CO INC A & A READY MIX INC A & E INC A G SIMPSON AUTOMOTIVE INC A KEY 3 CASTING CO A MATRIX METALS CO LLC A O SMITH CORP A RAYMOND TINNERMAN MANUFACTURING INC A SCHULMAN INC A TEICHERT
    [Show full text]
  • The AES Corporation
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C 20549-3010 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE March 12 2008 John Berkery Shearman Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York NY 10022-6069 Re The AES Corporation Incoming letter dated Februy 12 2008 Dear Mr Berkery This is in response to your letter dated February 12 2008 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to AES by the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund Our response is attached to the encl.sed photocopy of your correspondence By doing this we avoid having to recite or summarize the facts set forth in the correspondence Copies of all of the correspondence also will be provided to the proponent In connection with this matter your attention is directed to the enclosure which sets forth brief discussion of the Divisions informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals Sincerely Jonathan Ingram Deputy Chief Counsel Enclosures cc Douglas McCarron Fund Chairman United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund 101 Constitution Avenue N.W Washington DC 20001 March 12 2008 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re The ABS Corporation Incoming letter dated February 12 2008 committee The proposal requests that the boards executive compensation adopt executive pay-for-superior-performance principle by establishing an compensation plan the for senior executives that includes elements set forth in proposal We are unable to concur in your view that ABS may exclude the proposal under do believe that omit the from rule 14a-8i3 Accordingly
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ops 101: an Introduction to Cooperatives Donald A
    Co-ops 101 An Introduction to Cooperatives Cooperative Information Report 55 United States Department of Agriculture CI This report provides a comprehensive summary of basic informa- tion on the cooperative way of organizing and operating a business. It covers the nature and extent of the use of cooperatives, compares cooperatives to other business structures, explains the roles vari- ous people play in a cooperative, and discusses equity accumulation and income taxation. The purpose is to make available, in a single report, the information someone would need to acquire a general understanding of how cooperatives function. Keywords: Cooperative, Business, Finance, Structure, Tax Co-ops 101: An Introduction to Cooperatives Donald A. Frederick wrote this report in 1997 and revised it in 2005. This latest revision was completed by James J. Wadsworth and E. Eldon Eversull. Cooperative Information Report 55 April 1997 Revised November 2012 Publications and information are also available on the RBS web- site: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/NEWPUB.htm Email: [email protected] for more information. The mention of brand-names, trademarks, and company names in this publication is for illustrative purposes only, and in no way con- stitutes endorsement of any commercial enterprise or product. Preface Welcome to the dynamic world of cooperation—people working together to solve common problems and seize exciting opportuni- ties. Cooperatives are business entities that people use to provide themselves with goods and services. This booklet introduces you to the attributes that distinguish a cooperative from other ways to organize and conduct a business. Its purpose is to help you understand what makes a cooperative unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting
    Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting This alphabetized list of TRI Reporting Year (RY) 2011 Parent Company names is provided here as a reference for facilities filing their RY 2012 reports using paper forms. For RY 2012, the Agency is emphasizing the importance of accurate names for Parent Companies. Your facility may or may not have a Parent Company. Also, if you do have a Parent Company, please note that it is not necessarily listed here. Instructions Search for your standardized company name by pressing the CTRL+F keys. If your Parent Company is on this list, please write the name exactly as spelled and abbreviated here in Section 5.1 of the appropriate TRI Reporting Form. If your Parent Company is not on this list, please clearly write out the name of your parent company. In either case, please use ALL CAPITAL letters and DO NOT use periods. Please consult the most recent TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions (http://www.epa.gov/tri/report/index.htm) if you need additional information on reporting for reporting Parent Company names. Find your standardized company name on the alphabetical list below, or search for a name by pressing the CTRL+F keys Standardized Parent Company Names 3A COMPOSITES USA INC 3F CHIMICA AMERICAS INC 3G MERMET CORP 3M CO 5N PLUS INC A & A MANUFACTURING CO INC A & A READY MIX INC A & E CUSTOM TRUCK A & E INC A FINKL & SONS CO A G SIMPSON AUTOMOTIVE INC A KEY 3 CASTING CO A MATRIX METALS CO LLC A O SMITH CORP A RAYMOND TINNERMAN MANUFACTURING INC A SCHULMAN INC A TEICHERT & SON INC A TO Z DRYING
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Electric Co-Ops Detail Their Experiences
    Rural Electric Co-ops Detail Their Experiences SEPTEMBER 2017 With insights from: UTILITIES TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL • CONEXON • PULSE BROADBAND • OPALCO • CO-MO ELECTRIC • NORTH ALABAMA ELECTRIC • NORTHEAST RURAL SERVICES • ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC • UNITED ELECTRIC • MAKING THE MOVE INTO BROADBAND Rural Electric Co-ops Detail Their Experiences CoBank’s Electric Distribution/Broadband team is proud to present this collection SEPtember 2017 of interviews with industry experts and rural electric cooperatives that have made the move into broadband. We hope these interviews serve as a guide for any electric co-op considering an expansion into broadband. CoBank’s ElECTRIC DISTRIBUTION/BROADBAND TEAM .........................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Bill LaDuca, CoBank .................................................................................................... 1 PART I: INDUSTRY EXPERTS 1. Supporting the Move to Broadband: A Talk With the UTC ........................................................... 3 Brett Kilbourne, Utilities Technology Council 2. The Uses and Importance of a Feasibility Study in Preparing for a Build-out .......................... 8 Randy Klindt, Conexon, LLC 3. The High-Level View From a Leading Broadband Partner .......................................................... 14 Eric Freesmeier, Pulse Broadband PART II: CO-OP CASE STUDIES 1. On a Chain of Islands in Washington, an Unlikely Recipe for Broadband Expansion ............. 21 Foster Hildreth, OPALCO 2. How a Pioneer in Fiber
    [Show full text]