The View from Here
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015 Annual Report
annual report 2015 Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation A MESSAGE FROM OUR CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS Dear Friends and Colleagues: Every day Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation A (Brooklyn A) helps improve the lives of people who live in pov- erty. We are dedicated to the principle that lawyers can help open doors and level the playing field for people facing enormous life challenges. Over the past year, hundreds of people like you - our friends and supporters - have supported our Mission to advance social and economic justice and community empowerment through innovative, collaborative, neighborhood-based legal representation and advocacy. Thanks to your support, Brooklyn A has been able to help more people in need than ever before. Our staff has tirelessly assisted thousands of people throughout Brooklyn, and New York City wide, in their fight for social justice. Through our Preserving Affordable Housing Program we closed 614 individual cases, affecting 1,666 individuals and families. We represented 86 tenant associations, in rent-stabilized housing, through which we have kept in and/or restored tenants to their homes. The Community and Economic Advocacy Program provided services to 160 homeowners facing foreclosure of which 49 cases were closed, impacting the lives of 355 adults (including 52 seniors) and 129 children. The Community and Economic Development Program represented 50 not-for-profit community-based organizations (CBOs) and community development corporations (CDCs) on 70 development and operational projects, which impacted the lives of 103,101 individuals and families. Our Community Legal Education work, including presentations, brochures, and website information, reached 46,038 people, enabling them to learn about their rights and protect themselves against landlord harassment. -
The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public
The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public A Briefing Report of the New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights March 2018 Advisory Committees to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights By law, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory Committee in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. These Committees are composed of state/district citizens who serve without compensation; they are tasked with advising the Commission of civil rights issues in their states/district that are within the Commission’s jurisdiction. Committees are authorized to advise the Commission in writing of any knowledge or information they have of any alleged deprivation of voting rights and alleged discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or in the administration of justice; advise the Commission on matters of their state or district’s concern in the preparation of Commission reports to the President and the Congress; receive reports, suggestions, and recommendations from individuals, public officials, and representatives of public and private organizations to Committee inquiries; forward advice and recommendations to the Commission, as requested; and observe any open hearing or conference conducted by the Commission in their states/district. Acknowledgements The New York Advisory Committee thanks all of the participants in the March 20 and 21, 2017 briefings for sharing their expertise. The Committee also thanks the senior leadership of the NYPD for taking the time to share their expertise with us on the several days of interviews we conducted with them. -
REGULATING RACIST SPEECH on CAMPUS: a MODEST PROPOSAL?T
REGULATING RACIST SPEECH ON CAMPUS: A MODEST PROPOSAL?t NADINE STROSSEN* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................... 487 I. Some Limited Forms of Campus Hate Speech May Be Regulable Under Current Constitutional Doctrine .......... 495 A. General ConstitutionalPrinciples Applicable to Regulating Campus Hate Speech ...................... 495 B. ParticularSpeech-Limiting Doctrines Potentially Applicable to Campus Hate Speech .................... 507 1. Fighting Words ................................... 508 2. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress ......... 514 t The title is drawn from Jonathan Swift's essay A Modest Proposalfor preventing the Children of poor Peoplefrom being a Burthen to their Parentsor the Country, andfor Making them Beneficial to the Public (Dublin 1729), in JONATHAN SwIFr 492 (A. Ross & D. Woolley eds. 1984). This Article not only responds to the specific points made in Lawrence, If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus, 1990 DUKE L.J. 431 [hereinafter Lawrence], but also addresses the general issues raised by the many recent proposals to regulate racist and other forms of hate speech on campus. Professor Strossen's Article, as well as Professor Lawrence's, are expanded versions of oral presentations that they made at the Biennial Conference of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in Madison, Wisconsin on June 16, 1989 (available from author). After discussion of these presentations, the Conference adopted the following resolution: The ACLU should undertake educational activities to counter incidents of racist, sexist, anti-semitic and homophobic behavior (including speech) on school campuses and should encourage school administrators to speak out vigorously against such incidents. At the same time, the ACLU should undertake educational activities to counter efforts to limit or punish speech on university campuses. -
NEWSLINE, April 2009 Local 237 Member Services
Local 237 NEWSLINE HERHO OT O R D B O L F A T N E O A I M T A S T N E R R E S T N I April 2009 Vol. 43, No.4 R Our Union’s First Political Forum Puts City Candidates on Call About 500 “early birds” 237 with me!” He had 237 gathered at 8 a.m. on April 18 with him again in 2007 when in the Hilton New York Hotel “When Teamsters make their minds up to elect President Floyd joined him in to do their part in changing someone, we do!” – President Gregory Floyd the Save Our Homes Initia - the future of this city for the tive, providing help to home - better. Shop stewards, mem - owners facing foreclosure. bers, retirees, union staffers, “We realized then that the and friends were guests of first people to lose their 237’s first-ever Political homes were African Ameri - Forum. Also in attendance cans and Latinos,” said were the NYC Press Corps, the Thompson, who attended our Daily News and NBC and CBS May 1 rally at City Hall last News. The event provided a year to protest cuts in public private preview of city candi - housing funds. He noted that dates for mayor, comptroller he and Patricia Stryker, Local and public advocate, who ad - 237 trustee and chair of the dressed union members and Candidates Political Forum, answered their questions. both members of the board of “We came here because NYCERS, have pressed the we care about this city,” af - board for greater investment firmed President Gregory in affordable housing. -
CCR Annual Report 2012
169 men 685,724 NYC Stop and Frisk 2011 remain imprisoned 84% Black and Latino at Guantánamo 6% result in arrests without trial 2% contraband found 2012 Annual Report The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. www.CCRjustice.org table of contents Letter from the Executive Director ........................................................................................ 2 Guantánamo .............................................................................................................................. 4 International Human Rights ................................................................................................... 8 Government Misconduct and Racial Injustice ................................................................ 12 Movement Support .................................................................................................................. 16 Social Justice Institute ........................................................................................................... 18 Communications .................................................................................................................... 20 Letter from the Legal Director ............................................................................................. -
Westchester Unions Rally for Construction Jobs the Difficulties In
WESTCHESTER’S OLDEST AND MOST RESPECTED NEWSPAPERS Vol 115 Number 1 www.RisingMediaGroup.com Friday, January 4, 2019 Happy 2019 New York, TSA Workers at County Legal Pot for All! Airport Work Without Pay Government Shutdown Continues New York State is expected to legalize marijuana this year. By Dan Murphy justice systems: one for the wealthy and the well County Executive George Latimer visits with TSA workers at Westchester Airport. Last month, Gov. Andrew Cuomo delivered off, and one for everyone else,” he said. “Let’s a speech previewing his plans and the plans of legalize the adult use of recreational marijuana By Dan Murphy ing a paycheck during the shutdown, TSA work- the democratic majorities in the Assembly and once and for all.” As the federal government shutdown contin- ers have continued to work and serve the people of State Senate, which includes the legalization of In Westchester, several public discussion ues, one place in Westchester that should be affect- Westchester and our country by working without marijuana. “The fact is we have had two criminal Continued on Page 8 ed is the Westchester County Airport. But despite pay. the lack of federal government employees receiv- Continued on Page 9 The Difficulties in Relocating Homeless Shelters in West. Clash of the Titans for County Court Judge DiFiore & Scarpino Push Their Choice Relocating a homeless shelter in any community is difficult. By Dan Murphy In the northern Westchester City of Peek- Former Westchester DA and NYS Chief Court Justice Janet DiFiore and Westchester DA Anthony Scarpino. Regardless of what part of Westchester skill, residents came out to oppose the proposed County you live in, the opposition to not having relocation of the only 24-hour, 365-day homeless By Dan Murphy Court seat in Westchester began last year, with a homeless shelter or even a Family Court facil- adult shelter in the northern part of the county. -
The State of Education in New York City's Hasidic Yeshivas
NON≠ EQUIVALENT: THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN NEW YORK CITY’S HASIDIC YESHIVAS SEPTEMBER 2017 Yaffed (Young Advocates for Fair Education) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit advocacy organization committed to improving secular education within ultra-Orthodox schools. We fervently believe that every child is entitled to a fair and equitable education that is in compliance with the law. Our work involves raising awareness about the importance of general studies education, and encouraging elected officials, Department of Education officials and the leadership of the ultra-Orthodox world to act responsibly in preparing their youth for economic sufficiency and for broad access to the resources of the modern world. © 2017 Young Advocates for Fair Education (Yaffed, Inc.) All rights reserved. Report Chairs: Marci A. Hamilton, JD and Louis Grumet, JD Principal Author: Alisa Partlan, MNLM Editor: Naftuli Moster, MSW Contributing Authors: Dena S. Davis, JD, PhD Samuel Heilman, PhD Michael Zanger-Tishler Contributing Researcher: Abigail Beatty Graphic Designer: JJ Raskin Translation: Gittel Schwartz and Naftuli Moster Yaffed would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with this report: Steven M. Cohen, PhD, Matty Lichtenstein, MA, Justin Leites, Miriam Moster, and all of the yeshiva graduates, parents, teachers, and other community members who lent their voices and stories to this work. For more information: www.yaffed.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Naftuli Moster 2 Executive Summary 4 Background 12 Who are the Haredim? Samuel Heilman 12 Laws and Guidelines Dena S. Davis 16 History 19 Politics 26 The Current State of Yeshiva Education 31 Scope of the Issue 41 Demographic Projections Michael Zanger-Tishler 44 Funding and Economic Impact 51 Yeshiva Funding 51 Economic Impact 62 Recommendations 64 Appendices 67 NON≠EQUIVALENT INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION NAFTULI MOSTER, MSW FOUNDER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, YAFFED Yaffed was founded to address the lack of secular education in many ultra-Orthodox schools. -
Motion and Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys
Case 1:16-cv-03025-JKB Document 47 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RHONDA L. HUTTON, O.D. et al., CASE NO. 1:16-CV-03025-JKB Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, INC. Defendant. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL AND NAMED PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARDS AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF Dated: April 17, 2019 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Norman E. Siegel Norman E. Siegel (pro hac vice) Barrett J. Vahle (pro hac vice) J. Austin Moore (pro hac vice) STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200 Kansas City MO 64112 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Tel: (816) 714-7100 Fax: (816) 714-7101 Class Counsel Case 1:16-cv-03025-JKB Document 47 Filed 04/17/19 Page 2 of 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. HISTORY OF THE LITIGATION .....................................................................................3 III. SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS ACHIEVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT ..........9 A. The Settlement Class............................................................................................................9 B. The Settlement Benefits .....................................................................................................10 -
Report and Recommendations
Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 399 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 312 NEW YORK CITY JOINT REMEDIAL PROCESS On NYPD's Stop, Question, and Frisk, and Trespass Enforcement Policies FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Hon. Ariel E. Belen (Ret.) Facilitator Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 399 Filed 05/16/18 Page 2 of 312 NEW YORK CITY STOP & FRISK JOINT REMEDIAL PROCESS Facilitation Team Facilitator Hon. Ariel E. Belen (Ret.) Senior Advisor Reinaldo Rivera Project Manager Jeanene Barrett, Ph.D. Candidate Assistant Project Manager Valerie Paul Project Attorney Cliff Bloomfield, Esq. Project Assistant Jennifer Dionicio JAMS Administrative Team JAMS General Manager Matthew York JAMS Case Manager Alicia Jantsch JAMS Case Manager Anne Goodwin Cover Photo: The cover page contains a photograph of an abandoned warehouse visible from Third Street in the Gowanus section of Brooklyn. The graffiti on the parapet reads “End Stop and Frisk Hands off the Kids” Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 399 Filed 05/16/18 Page 3 of 312 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ i SECTION II: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 SECTION III: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE JOINT REMEDIAL PROCESS................... 14 SECTION IV: RECENT HISTORY OF POLICE-COMMUNITY RELATIONS IN IMPACTED COMMUNITIES: ........................................................................................................................ -
Legal Issues in Sports Security
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 13 Volume XIII Number 2 Volume XIII Book 2 Article 1 2003 Panel I: Legal Issues in Sports Security Richard H. Fallon, Jr. Harvard Law School Milton Ahlerich National Football League Norman Siegel Freedom Legal Defense and Education Project William D. Squires Giants Stadium Paul H. Zoubek Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard H. Fallon, Jr.; Milton Ahlerich; Norman Siegel; William D. Squires; Paul H. Zoubek; and Laura Freedman, Panel I: Legal Issues in Sports Security, 13 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 349 (2003). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol13/iss2/1 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Panel I: Legal Issues in Sports Security Authors Richard H. Fallon, Jr.; Milton Ahlerich; Norman Siegel; William D. Squires; Paul H. Zoubek; and Laura Freedman This transcript is available in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol13/iss2/1 1 - PANEL I FORMAT 4/15/03 9:25 AM PANEL I: Legal Issues in Sports Security Moderator: Richard H. -
Revisiting Who Is Guarding the Guardians?
Revisiting Who Is Guarding the Guardians? A Report on Police Practices and Civil Rights in America Acknowledgments The Commission proceeding was organized and the report was written under the supervision of Acting General Counsel Edward A. Hailes, Jr. Project team leader Joseph Manalili* and attorney-advisors Kim Ball, Deborah Reid, Joyce Smith, and Audrey Wiggins performed preliminary research and planning for the proceeding. Additional assistance was provided by the Public Affairs Unit through its deputy chief Marcia Tyler and editor David Aronson. Further assistance was provided by Kimberly Alton, special assistant to the staff director. Clerical support was given by legal secretary Pamela Moye and administrative assistant Carolita Little of the Public Affairs Unit. Project team leader Joseph Manalili and attorney-advisors Deborah Reid, Jenny Kim Park, Joyce Smith, and Audrey Wiggins drafted the report. Attorney-advisors Kim Ball, Barbara de La Viez, Michael Foreman, Emma Gonzalez-Joy, and Bernard Quarterman conducted the legal sufficiency review. The report was prepared for publication by Dawn Sweet. The Commission acknowledges with gratitude the tremendous contributions of the selected experts to this important project. * No longer with the Commission 111 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... ...... ........ ............ -
VOLUME 10 NUMBER 1 NYU Journal of Intellectual Property
JIPEL NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law VOLUME 10 NUMBER 1 Statement of Purpose Consistent with its unique development, The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL) is a nonpartisan periodical specializing in the analysis of timely and cutting-edge topics in the world of intellectual property and entertainment law. As NYU’s first online-only journal, JIPEL also provides an opportunity for discourse through comments from all of its readers. There are no subscriptions, or subscription fees; in keeping with the open-access and free discourse goals of the students responsible for JIPEL’s existence, the content is available for free to anyone interested in intellectual property and entertainment law. ii Cite as N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law is published two times per year at the New York University School of Law, 139 MacDougal Street, New York, New York, 10012. In keeping with the Journal’s open access and free discourse goals subscriptions are free of charge and can be accessed via www.jipel.law.nyu.edu. Inquiries may be made via telephone (212-998-6101) or electronic mail ([email protected]). The Journal invites authors to submit pieces for publication consideration. Footnotes and citations should follow the rules set forth in the latest edition of The Bluebook A Uniform System of Citation. All pieces submitted become the property of the Journal. We review submissions through ExpressO Bepress (http://law.bepress.com/ expresso/) and through electronic mail ([email protected]).