DOCSLIB.ORG

The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Civil Rights Implications of The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public A Briefing Report of the New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights March 2018 Advisory Committees to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights By law, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory Committee in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. These Committees are composed of state/district citizens who serve without compensation; they are tasked with advising the Commission of civil rights issues in their states/district that are within the Commission’s jurisdiction. Committees are authorized to advise the Commission in writing of any knowledge or information they have of any alleged deprivation of voting rights and alleged discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or in the administration of justice; advise the Commission on matters of their state or district’s concern in the preparation of Commission reports to the President and the Congress; receive reports, suggestions, and recommendations from individuals, public officials, and representatives of public and private organizations to Committee inquiries; forward advice and recommendations to the Commission, as requested; and observe any open hearing or conference conducted by the Commission in their states/district. Acknowledgements The New York Advisory Committee thanks all of the participants in the March 20 and 21, 2017 briefings for sharing their expertise. The Committee also thanks the senior leadership of the NYPD for taking the time to share their expertise with us on the several days of interviews we conducted with them. The Committee greatly appreciates the many contributions of the Committee’s members who helped set the agenda, identify and interview the participants, run the briefings and produce this report. The Staff of the Eastern Regional Office extends special thanks to the invaluable support and work on this project of Christine Trent-Parker, Evan Maass, Bonnie Macfarlane, Christopher Stewart, Soshana Brown and Briana Banks, as well as the contributions of Natalie Lum-Tai, Karoline Koenig, Michael Mayer, Hannah Waldman, Carine Williams, Cason Kynes, Kyra Kaufman, Andrew Thompson, Rebecca Kadosh, and Nicholas Bitner. Lastly, the Committee thanks Barbara de La Viez and David Barreras, the designated federal officers, and Ivy L. Davis, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, for the administrative and programmatic support that they have provided. Letter of Transmittal New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights The New York Advisory Committee (Committee) submits this report, “The Civil Rights Implications of “Broken Windows” Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public,” as part of its responsibility to advise the Commission on Civil Rights issues within New York State. Beginning in Fall 2016, the Committee set out to review the effects of New York Police Department (the “NYPD”) low level offense enforcement practices on individuals of color, with a particular emphasis on youth, as well as the accountability structures and oversight mechanisms governing the NYPD. The Committee held two days of public briefings on these issues in New York City on March 20 and March 21, 2017. Testimony was provided to the Committee by 27 persons on 11 panels. The presenters were academics, government officials and advocates with particular expertise on the matters covered by this report. The Committee also held interviews with senior leadership of the NYPD on February 13, February 15 and December 19, 2017 to garner the NYPD’s perspective. This report summarizes important information from the presenters’ testimony, written submissions, publicly available information, and interviews with senior leadership of the NYPD. The report provides recommendations based on the information received. The Advisory Committee trusts the Commission and the public will find the material in this report informative. New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Alexandra Korry, Chair, New York Roy Cosme, New York Iris Chen, New York Bryanne Hamill, New York Sandra Dunn, Port Washington Gertrud Lenzer, Brooklyn Julian Ku, Hempstead Johnny Perez, New York Vivian Louie, New York Kevin Thomas, Levittown Steven Raga, Queens Tom Wahl, Jr., Rochester Alex Vitale, Brooklyn Peter Wood, New York Earl Ward, New York Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: “Broken Windows” Policing .................................................................................1 A. Consequences of Low-level Enforcement ...............................................................5 B. Impact on Communities of Color ..........................................................................11 C. NYPD Policing Tactics and Their Reforms...........................................................15 1. Legislative Reforms: The Criminal Justice Reform Act and The Right to Know Act .....................................................................................25 2. Neighborhood Policing ..............................................................................32 3. Precision Policing ......................................................................................36 4. Marijuana Enforcement .............................................................................46 5. Improved Training .....................................................................................48 D. Recommendations ..................................................................................................53 Chapter 2: “Broken Windows” Policing in Schools .............................................................56 A. The MOU and Authority of SSOs .........................................................................59 B. The Impact of Criminalizing School Behaviors ....................................................62 C. The Impact on Students of Color ...........................................................................69 D. Accountability of Officers in Schools ....................................................................72 E. Recommendations ..................................................................................................74 Chapter 3: Police Accountability ...........................................................................................76 A. NYPD Data and General Transparency .................................................................77 B. Disciplinary Transparency/New York Civil Rights Law 50-A .............................84 C. Shielding Officers from Personal Liability for Misconduct ..................................87 D. Criminal Cases Against Officers ...........................................................................90 E. Civil Lawsuits Against Officers.............................................................................95 F. NYPD Policies and Internal Supervision and Feedback........................................97 G. CCRB as an External Oversight Mechanism .......................................................104 H. Body-Worn Camera Policy ..................................................................................114 I. Recommendations ................................................................................................125 Preface On March 20 and 21, 2017, the New York State Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights (the “Committee”) held a briefing (the “Briefing”) on “broken windows” policing in New York City (“NYC” or the “City”), as well as the accountability structures and oversight mechanisms governing the New York City Police Department (the “NYPD”). The Committee focused its inquiry on whether low-level NYPD enforcement disproportionately affects communities of color in NYC, and particularly the youth in those communities. At the same time, the Committee invited comment on the accountability structures and mechanisms of the NYPD and how they affect both police officer behavior and the public’s perception of the NYPD. The Committee invited academics, advocates and government officials to participate in and testify at the Briefing.1 The presenters who chose to testify included representatives from various agencies and institutions in NYC and the State of New York, as well as community advocates, lawyers and scholars. At the Briefing, the presenters discussed (a) the history, use and effects of “broken windows” policing in NYC, (b) the presence and effect of police officers and school safety officers in NYC schools, and (c) the current framework of police accountability structures, and their efficacy in holding NYPD wrongdoers accountable for their actions and promoting trust within NYC communities. The presenters also proposed recommendations to address some of the issues that currently affect the relationship between the NYPD and the greater NYC community – especially the relationship between the NYPD and communities of color. In addition to the Briefing, on February 13 and 15, 2017, the NYPD provided the Committee with unprecedented access to many of its senior leadership for interview sessions, and on December 19, 2017 held a follow-up meeting with the Committee.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Articles on Crimes Against Humanity
    Draft articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity 2019 Adopted by the International Law Commission at its seventy-first session, in 2019, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session (A/74/10). The report will appear in Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2019, vol. II, Part Two. Copyright © United Nations 2019 Prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity … Mindful that throughout history millions of children, women and men have been victims of crimes that deeply shock the conscience of humanity, Recognizing that crimes against humanity threaten the peace, security and well- being of the world, Recalling the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations, Recalling also that the prohibition of crimes against humanity is a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens), Affirming that crimes against humanity, which are among the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, must be prevented in conformity with international law, Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prevention of such crimes, Considering the definition of crimes against humanity set forth in article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Recalling that it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction with respect to crimes against humanity, Considering the rights of victims, witnesses and others in relation to crimes against humanity, as well as the right of alleged offenders to fair treatment, Considering also that, because crimes against humanity must not go unpunished, the effective prosecution of such crimes must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing international cooperation, including with respect to extradition and mutual legal assistance, … Article 1 Scope The present draft articles apply to the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Book of Restorative Justice
    The authors THE LITTLE BOOK OF oward Zehr directed the first victim offender conferencing program in the U.S. and is one H of the developers of restorative justice as a concept. His book Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice is considered a classic in the field. His other publications include Doing Life: Reflections of Men and Women Serving Life Sentences, Transcending: Reflections of Crime Victims and The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Forthcoming in fall, 2003, is The Little Book of Family Group Conferences, New Zealand Style (with Allan MacRae). Dr. Zehr is Co-Director of the graduate Conflict Transformation Program at Eastern Mennonite University. From this base he also teaches and practices in the field of restorative justice. Zehr received his M.A. from the University of Chicago and his Ph.D. from Rutgers University. li Gohar worked as Additional Commissioner Social Welfare Cell for Afghan Refugees for A thirteen years. Presently working as Chief Executive, Just Peace International inc. for Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ali Gohar received his MSc in International Relations from Quaid-i-Azam university Islamabad . He completed his second Master in Conflict Transformation as a Fulbright Scholar from Eastern Mennonite University VA, USA. The Pushto, Urdu and Persian (Dari) version of the hand book by the same authors are under publications. [email protected] Ph: ++92 - 91 - 5700724 The authors THE LITTLE BOOK OF oward Zehr directed the first victim offender conferencing program in the U.S. and is one H of the developers of restorative justice as a concept. His book Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice is considered a classic in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Restorative Versus Retributive Justice Kathleen Daly Reviews the Discourse That Has Framed Restorative Justice As the Antidote to Punishment
    Restorative versus Retributive Justice Kathleen Daly reviews the discourse that has framed restorative justice as the antidote to punishment. n 'Restorative justice: the real story' (Punishment and Advocates seem to assume that an ideal justice system should Society 2002), Kathleen Daly draws on her experience of be of one type only, that it should be pure and not contaminated / restorative justice conferencing and an extensive survey of by or mixed with others. [Even when calling for the need to academic literature to refute four myths that she says have "blend restorative, reparative, and transformative justice... with grown up around restorative justice. These are that: (1) the prosecution of paradigmatic violations of human rights", restorative justice is the opposite of retributive justice; (2) Drambl (2000:296) is unable to avoid using the term 'retributive' restorative justice uses indigenous justice practices and was to refer to responses that should be reserved for the few.] the dominant form ofpre-modern justice; (3) restorative justice Before demonstrating the problems with this position, I give a is a 'care' (or feminine) response to crime in comparison to a sympathetic reading of what I think advocates are trying to say. justice' (or masculine) response; and (4) restorative justice Mead's (1917-18) 'The Psychology of Punitive Justice' can be expected to produce major changes in people. She says contrasts two methods of responding to crime. One he termed that "simple oppositional dualisms are inadequate in depicting"the attitude of hostility toward the lawbreaker" (p. 227), which criminal justice, even in an ideal justice system", and argues "brings with it the attitudes of retribution, repression, and for a 'real story' which would serve the political future of exclusion" (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Prosecutions and Punitive Instincts
    Washington University Law Review Volume 98 Issue 4 2021 Police Prosecutions and Punitive Instincts Kate Levine Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Kate Levine, Police Prosecutions and Punitive Instincts, 98 WASH. U. L. REV. 0997 (2021). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol98/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Review VOLUME 98 NUMBER 4 2021 POLICE PROSECUTIONS AND PUNITIVE INSTINCTS KATE LEVINE* ABSTRACT This Article makes two contributions to the fields of policing and criminal legal scholarship. First, it sounds a cautionary note about the use of individual prosecutions to remedy police brutality. It argues that the calls for ways to ease the path to more police prosecutions from legal scholars, reformers, and advocates who, at the same time, advocate for a dramatic reduction of the criminal legal system’s footprint, are deeply problematic. It shows that police prosecutions legitimize the criminal legal system while at the same time displaying the same racism and ineffectiveness that have been shown to pervade our prison-backed criminal machinery. The Article looks at three recent trials and convictions of police officers of color, Peter Liang, Mohammed Noor, and Nouman Raja, in order to underscore the argument that the criminal legal system’s race problems are * Associate Professor of Law, Benjamin N.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy the 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy
    The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy Today’s public safety leaders often feel squeezed in a vise. On one side pressure is ramping up to respond to ever- more-complex crime and public safety threats such as natural disasters, violent extremism, and cybercrime. On the other side are pressing demands for citizen engagement, stakeholder collaboration, and community outreach. Policing leaders can feel torn: Should they focus on fighting crime efficiently? Or should they focus on growing public trust? Forward-thinking public safety leaders realize that to build legitimacy the answer is “yes” – to improving both crime prevention and public trust. Yet to accomplish both objectives, public safety leaders need to pursue innovations that increase organizational capacity. In a world of limited resources, finding the right mix of innovations will require grappling with tough questions. To help public safety leaders move forward on this challenge, Leadership for a Networked World and the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard, in collaboration with Accenture, convened senior-most leaders for The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy. Held at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from April 29 – May 1, 2016, the Summit provided an unparalleled opportunity to learn from and work with policing and public safety peers, Harvard faculty and researchers, and select industry experts. Summit attendees dissected case studies and participated in peer-to-peer problem-solving and plenary sessions in an effort to learn and work together on four key leadership strategies: Convened by In collaboration with 2 The 2016 Public Safety Summit • Innovative approaches and operating models to reduce operational costs and complexity while increasing agility in policing structures, systems, and people.
    [Show full text]
  • Racing the Pandemic: Anti-Asian Racism Amid COVID-19
    9 Racing the Pandemic Anti-Asian Racism amid COVID-19 Christine R. Yano How does race shape the experience of the current and ongoing global pandemic? How does the pandemic shape the experience of race—in politics and in everyday lives? How have histories of racialization and racism in the United States and elsewhere allowed for the targeting of Asian Americans? How might we develop effective strategies that counter xenophobic racisms surrounding COVID-19? And in an ideal world seeking meaningful change, how might critical empathy—that is, reaching out to others with hearts, minds, bodies, and actions—play a crucial role?1 These questions structure my approach to discussing anti-Asian racism amid the pandemic with the goal of developing strategies of action for the targets of such racism, as well as for others for whom race-based violence is anathema. The Black Lives Matter movement has compelled us to thoughts and actions at a time when systemic racism can no longer be ignored. What the movement reminds us of is the ongoing salience of race as a basis for institutionalized and interpersonal actions, as these shape overt macroaggressions as well as more covert microaggressions. “China virus.” “Wuhan virus.” “Kung-flu.” These labels, uttered by people at the highest political echelons of the United States during one of the worst public health disasters within most people’s lifetimes, give permission for racial discrimination and violence, bringing anti-Asian racism into public light once again. Yellow Peril rears its ugly head—in earlier periods as a fear of Asians invading white worlds, 124 : THE PANDEMIC: PERSPECTIVES ON ASIA and here as an epidemiological fear of an Asian virus unleashed upon the world.2 In the words of psychiatrist Ravi Chandra, these pandemic labels, especially uttered by those in power, “disinhibit” the public from racist emotions and expressions.3 In using the term “disinhibit,” Chandra implies that anti-Asian racism lurks historically and broadly just below the surface, suppressed in the name of more rational or humane discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Social Influence Conception of Deterrence, the Broken Windows Theory, and Order- Maintenance Policing New York Style
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1998 Reflecting on the Subject: A Critique of the Social Influence Conception of Deterrence, the Broken Windows Theory, and Order- Maintenance Policing New York Style Bernard E. Harcourt Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bernard E. Harcourt, "Reflecting on the Subject: A Critique of the Social Influence Conception of Deterrence, the Broken Windows Theory, and Order-Maintenance Policing New York Style," 97 Michigan Law Review 291 (1998). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFLECTING ON THE SUBJECT: A CRITIQUE OF THE SOCIAL INFLUENCE CONCEPTION OF DETERRENCE, THE BROKEN WINDOWS THEORY, AND ORDER-MAINTENANCE POLICING NEW YORK STYLE Bernard E. Harcourt* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................ 292 I. ORDER-MAINTENANCE POLICING: A CRITICAL DESCRIPTION ....................................... 301 A. Background .................................... 301 B. The Broken Windows Essay ................... 302 C. The Social Influence Conception of D eterrence ..................................... 305 II. Ti LACK OF SOCIAL SCIENCE EVIDENCE ......... 308 A. Replicating Skogan's Study ..................... 309 B. The Sampson and Cohen Study ................ 329 C. New York City's Falling Crime Rates ........... 331 D. An Alternative Mechanism of Order- Maintenance Policing: Enhanced Surveillance.. 339 III. THE CATEGORIES UNDERLYING ORDER- MAINTENANCE POLICING .......................... 343 A. Who Are the Disorderly? ...................... 343 B. Tracing the Problem Back to Social Theory .... 347 C. Emile Durkheim on Legitimation and Legal Regulation ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • OAG Hearing on Interactions Between NYPD and the General Public Submitted Written Testimony
    OAG Hearing on Interactions Between NYPD and the General Public Submitted Written Testimony Tahanie Aboushi | New York, New York I am counsel for Dounya Zayer, the protestor who was violently shoved by officer D’Andraia and observed by Commander Edelman. I would like to appear with Dounya to testify at this hearing and I will submit written testimony at a later time but well before the June 15th deadline. Thank you. Marissa Abrahams | South Beach Psychiatric Center | Brooklyn, New York As a nurse, it has been disturbing to see first-hand how few NYPD officers (present en masse at ALL peaceful protests) are wearing the face masks that we know are preventing the spread of COVID-19. Demonstrators are taking this extremely seriously and I saw NYPD literally laugh in the face of a protester who asked why they do not. It is negligent and a blatant provocation -especially in the context of the over-policing of Black and Latinx communities for social distancing violations. The complete disregard of the NYPD for the safety of the people they purportedly protect and serve, the active attacks with tear gas and pepper spray in the midst of a respiratory pandemic, is appalling and unacceptable. Aaron Abrams | Brooklyn, New York I will try to keep these testimonies as precise as possible since I know your office likely has hundreds, if not thousands to go through. Three separate occasions highlighted below: First Incident - May 30th - Brooklyn - peaceful protestors were walking from Prospect Park through the streets early in the day. At one point, police stopped to block the street and asked that we back up.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Militarization and Use of Force
    LIVING IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY: A STUDY OF MILITARIZATION AND USE OF FORCE Cori Pryor A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 Committee: Thomas Mowen, Advisor Steve Demuth Danielle Kuhl ii ABSTRACT Thomas Mowen, Advisor Police militarization is happening on a widespread scale across the United States. However, very little is known about its relationship with use of force. At the same time, there has been a growing focus on community policing. Given the concurrent establishment of both of these trends, it is problematic that we do not know how these two tactics interplay with one another, especially in regard to use of force. Additionally, though force is thought to be a mechanism of social control that is unequally distributed in nonwhite communities, studies examining the link between militarization and use of force have yet to include race/ethnicity into their analysis. This paper attempts to address this important gap in the literature by examining the relationship between militarization and use of force through the lens of minority threat theory. I use data from Law Enforcement Management and Statistics 2013, American Community Survey 2009, and Uniform Crime Reports 2013, as well as item response theory and multivariate regression techniques to study this relationship. Results show that militarization is positive and significantly related to the number of use of force incidents recorded by an agency. Additionally, community policing shares a positive and significant relationship with use of force. However, neither racial demographics nor community policing moderate the relationship between militarization and use of force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Strategy of Policing
    U.S. nt of Justice Office ui .-:itlice Programs National Institute ofJustice November 1988 No. 4 A publication of the National Institute of Justice,U.S. Department of Justice, and the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University The Evolving Strategy of Policing By George L. Kelling and Mark H. Moore Policing, like all professions, learns from experience. This is one in a series of reports originally developed with It follows, then, that as modem police executives search some of the leading figuresin American policing during their for more effective strategies of policing, they will be guided periodic meetings at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy by the lessons of police history. The difficulty is that police School of Government. The reports are published so that history is incoherent, its lessons hard to read. After all, Americans interested in the improvement and the future of that history was produced by thousands of local departments policing can share in the information and perspectives that were part of extensivedebates at the School's Executive pursuing their own visions and responding to local condi- Session on Policing. tions. Although that varied experience is potentially a rich source of lessons, departments have left few records that The police chiefs, mayors, scholars,and others invited to the reveal the trends shaping modem policing. Interpretation meetings have focused on the use and promise of such strategies as community-based and problem-oriented policing. is necessary. The testing and adoption of these strategies by some police agencies signalimportant changes in the way American policing now does business.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Policing Defined the Primary Elements of Community Policing
    Community Policing Defined The Primary Elements of Community Policing Nonprof its / Service Providers Using the Crime Triangle Community Policing Community Policing Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, Defined and fear of crime. Community policing comprises three key components: Community Partnerships Collaborative partnerships between the law enforcement agency and the individuals and organizations they serve to develop solutions to problems and increase trust in police Organizational Transformation 1 The alignment of organizational management, structure, personnel, and information systems to support community partnerships and proactive problem solving Problem Solving The process of engaging in the proactive and systematic examination of identified problems to develop and evaluate effective responses Community Partnerships Collaborative partnerships between the law enforcement agency and the 2 individuals and organizations they serve to develop solutions to problems and increase trust in police Community policing, recognizing that police rarely can solve public safety problems alone, encourages interactive partnerships with relevant stakeholders. The range of potential partners is large, and these partnerships can be used to accomplish the two interrelated goals of developing solutions to problems through
    [Show full text]