The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy the 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy the 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy Today’s public safety leaders often feel squeezed in a vise. On one side pressure is ramping up to respond to ever- more-complex crime and public safety threats such as natural disasters, violent extremism, and cybercrime. On the other side are pressing demands for citizen engagement, stakeholder collaboration, and community outreach. Policing leaders can feel torn: Should they focus on fighting crime efficiently? Or should they focus on growing public trust? Forward-thinking public safety leaders realize that to build legitimacy the answer is “yes” – to improving both crime prevention and public trust. Yet to accomplish both objectives, public safety leaders need to pursue innovations that increase organizational capacity. In a world of limited resources, finding the right mix of innovations will require grappling with tough questions. To help public safety leaders move forward on this challenge, Leadership for a Networked World and the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard, in collaboration with Accenture, convened senior-most leaders for The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy. Held at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from April 29 – May 1, 2016, the Summit provided an unparalleled opportunity to learn from and work with policing and public safety peers, Harvard faculty and researchers, and select industry experts. Summit attendees dissected case studies and participated in peer-to-peer problem-solving and plenary sessions in an effort to learn and work together on four key leadership strategies: Convened by In collaboration with 2 The 2016 Public Safety Summit • Innovative approaches and operating models to reduce operational costs and complexity while increasing agility in policing structures, systems, and people. • Digital tools such as social media, data, and analytics to improve crime response and engage the community in the co-creation of public safety solutions. • New training methods to improve current capabilities and develop a pipeline for the leadership and skills needed in the future. • Techniques to build near-term operational capacity while simultaneously facilitating change and adapting organizational culture for the long-term. This report distills the key findings from the Summit. In particular, it features highlights from a special keynote address by Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service in London. The report also contains special sections on use-of-force policies and techniques to harness the power of data and analytics, as well as three noteworthy case presentations: • Kathleen O’Toole, Chief of the Seattle Police Department (SPD), and Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta described how SPD, the Department of Justice, and others have partnered to make SPD a model for reform and drive positive, sustainable change. • Nóirín O’Sullivan, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána, Ireland’s national police force, explains how she and her team have transformed the agency and restored the faith of citizens, government agencies, and partners. • Dermot Shea, New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) Deputy Commissioner for Operations, described the evolution of CompStat 2.0 as part of a broader effort to revamp the department and bolster public trust. We hope this report offers new ideas, strategies, and insights to help public safety leaders lead their organizations to new levels of capacity and legitimacy. Building Capacity and Legitimacy 3 Contents Reflections from the Executive Director................................................................... 5 “The Importance of Collaboration”: Seeding Change and Creating Accountability in Seattle . 7 Leadership Lessons from Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe . .13 A Journey of Transformation in Ireland . 17 Panel Discussion on Use of Force .......................................................................23 A Time for New Measures: Introducing CompStat 2.0 and Broader Reform in New York City ....................29 Public Safety in a Digital World: Harnessing the Power of Data and Analytics . .35 Summary . .37 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................38 4 The 2016 Public Safety Summit Reflections from the Executive Director Noted philosopher John Rawls asserted that the first virtue of public institutions is justice—the measure of how society cooperates to distribute and protect rights, opportunities, and liberties. Yet we are living in a time when society is reexamining what it means to be just. In today’s world, the concept of justice is by most accounts expanding. In the United States, for example, courts have broadened the scope of the 14th Amendment, which reads in part, “nor shall any state deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Thus, we are in an environment with a larger and more complex set of issues and challenges requiring “equal protection” by public institutions—particularly law enforcement and public safety organizations. Compounding the challenge of achieving justice is the degree to which changing societal conditions impact what citizens and stakeholders view as “just” and “valuable.” As crime trends shift, as public sentiment changes, and as society expands the scope of equal protection, the nature and definition of “value” shift accordingly. The Environmental Change in the Last Five Years volume and velocity of this change is staggering. Ninety 74% percent of the attendees at the Public Safety Summit said they are facing significant or extreme change in their operating environment, and 95 percent anticipate significant or extreme change in the next five years. For public safety leaders, this means that achieving 14% 10% justice—and the institutional value and legitimacy 0% 0% that result from it—is based on three interdependent No Minor Moderate Significant Extreme focuses: Change Change Change Change Change 1. Equally protecting citizens from ever-more-complex crime (a particularly important priority in a world with growing cybercrime, mental health problems, and domestic terrorism). 2. Equally protecting access to ever-more-robust rights, freedoms, and liberties. 3. Engaging with communities to define value and co-create solutions that build trust. The resulting imperative is that public safety leaders and stakeholders must continually adapt their organizations to new value propositions and methods of producing that value. To accomplish this, public safety organizations have to increase organizational capacity—the structures, systems, processes, and people that enable an organization to meet goals effectively and efficiently. What’s more, this capacity needs to be both static (i.e., able to be activated in real-time) and dynamic (i.e., able to grow and adapt over time). Building Capacity and Legitimacy 5 This is not an easy task. Ninety percent of the leaders at the Public Safety Summit said developing Environmental Change in the Next Five Years capacity in their organizations was “critical,” yet only 10 percent said they are “well prepared” to increase 90% capacity. There is much work to do. The focus of this year’s Summit was how to grow capacity in policing by working across boundaries— whether those boundaries are internal (i.e., across teams and units) or external (i.e., across agencies and sectors). The right amount of new capacity can often 5% 5% 0% 0% be found internally when an organization reorganizes No Minor Moderate Significant Extreme or recombines best practices and innovations. But Change Change Change Change Change sometimes an organization has to reach outside its boundaries to bring in new ideas, technologies, collaborations, and people. These new capabilities— whether they are internal or external—then have to be integrated into the organization, which means leaders have to overcome an array of legal, structural, cultural, Importance of Increasing Capacity and political barriers. 43% There is much reason for hope. As the cases and 38% insights from this report show, there is enormous creativity and innovation in public safety. Together, we can create new operating models that will help public safety leaders respond to a new environment, adapt their organizations, and build the capacity that leads to 5% 5% 5% better justice, value, trust, and legitimacy. Please join us 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 on this journey. Unimportant Critical With hope and resolve, All the best, Organizational Preparedness to Increase Capacity 67% Dr. Antonio M. Oftelie Executive Director, Leadership for a Networked World Fellow, Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 19% 10% 5% Not Somewhat Moderately Well Prepared Prepared Prepared Prepared 6 The 2016 Public Safety Summit “The Importance of Collaboration”: Seeding Change and Creating Accountability in Seattle In January 2016, Kathleen O’Toole, Chief of the Seattle Police Department (SPD), “I learned very early in my received wonderful, if startling news. White House officials wanted to know if career that the adversarial she would be interested in sitting in the First Lady’s box as an honored guest at President Obama’s final State of the Union address. approach doesn’t work, Nineteen months earlier, when O’Toole had become SPD’s chief, it would have that we really do need to been hard to imagine SPD receiving
Recommended publications
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 9 June, 1955 3295
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9 JUNE, 1955 3295 Abdul HAMTD bin Sulong, Sub-Inspector, James Myles OSWALD, Superintendent, Kenya Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Samuel Benjamin HULL, Station Sergeant, Robert Lawrence Ako OTCHERE, Inspector, Leeward Islands Police Force. Gold Coast Police Force. Ignatius IKENWEWI, Sergeant Major, Nigeria Haji PAWANCHEE bin Mohamed Yusoff, Police Force. Inspector, Federation of Malaya Police George William JACKSON, Acting Senior Assis- Force. tant Commissioner, Singapore Police Force. Thomas PETERS, Chief Inspector, Sierra Leone JOHARI bin Abdul Shukor, Sub-Inspector, Police Force. Federation of Malaya Police Force. Kesava Subramonya PILLAI, Chief Inspector, Philip Nzuke Jacob KALOKI, Inspector, Kenya Kenya Police Force. Police Force. John Vincent PRENDERGAST, Senior Superin- Reginald LAITY, Honorary Inspector, Auxiliary tendent, Kenya Police Force. Police, Federation of Malaya. Panes PRODROMITIS, Chief Inspector, Cyprus LAM Hon, Detective Staff Sergeant, Hong Kong Police Force. Police Force. Chinaya Naidoo PURSEERAMEN, Sub-Inspector, Alfred Gordon LANGDON, Assistant Commis- Mauritius Police Force. sioner, Jamaica Constabulary. Abdul RAHMAN bin Dalbasah, Acting Assistant LIM Choon Seng, Sub-Inspector, Singapore Superintendent, Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Appudhurai Thurai RAJAH, Deputy Superin- Ronald George LOCK, Superintendent, Nigeria tendent, Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Frank Thomas READER, Deputy Superinten- William Alfred LUSCOMBE, Deputy Superin- dent, Uganda Police Force. tendent, Federation of Malaya Police Force. Matendechero RINYULU, Assistant Inspector, David Robert Andrew McCoRKELL, M.C., Kenya Police Force. Acting Superintendent, Federation of Malaya William SEGRUE, Acting Assistant Com- Police Force. missioner, Hong Kong Police Force. John Malcolm McNeil MACLEAN, Assistant SHABANI son of Msaweka, Detective Sergeant Commissioner, Singapore Police Force. Major, Tanganyika Police Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Leadership for a Changing World
    REPORT .93 Law Enforcement Leadership for a Changing World Michael Outram Australian Federal Police Australia Rainer Brenner Bundespolizei Germany Dougal McClelland National Crime Agency UK Anders Dorph Danish National Police Denmark “Developing leaders for the future is vital; crime is no longer constrained by borders and we’re seeing the death of distance; police are being held to higher levels of accountability for outcomes and performance; and the environment we live in is evolving more quickly than ever.” Pearls in Policing member Ng Joo He, 2012. Introduction - Pearls in Policing Inspired by the international Bilderberg concept, since 2007 Pearls in Policing has brought an international group of top law enforcement executives together to discuss the key strategic issues facing their profession, in an environment that is conducive to focussing on the future (Pearls in Policing, 2012). The debate and insights that emerge from Pearls in Policing both inform and are informed by the work of an action learning group, which is one of five components of the Pearls in Policing model: Journal of Futures Studies, June 2014, 18(4): 93-106 Journal of Futures Studies 1. An annual conference 2. The International Action Learning Group (IALG), known as the ‘Pearl Fishers’ 3. An academic forum 4. Work groups 5. Peer-to-peer consultations The annual conference is held each June. In 2013 the conference was held in Amsterdam, where the 7th IALG presented their research findings which built on the research of previous IALG’s; in 2011 the chosen theme was Charting the Course of Change, which examined how social media, new technology and the formation of strategic alliances influence change in policing; in 2012 the chosen theme was Policing for a Safer World, which examined professionalism, collective approaches to cybercrime, and achieving a discipline of learning across organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • OAG Hearing on Interactions Between NYPD and the General Public Submitted Written Testimony
    OAG Hearing on Interactions Between NYPD and the General Public Submitted Written Testimony Tahanie Aboushi | New York, New York I am counsel for Dounya Zayer, the protestor who was violently shoved by officer D’Andraia and observed by Commander Edelman. I would like to appear with Dounya to testify at this hearing and I will submit written testimony at a later time but well before the June 15th deadline. Thank you. Marissa Abrahams | South Beach Psychiatric Center | Brooklyn, New York As a nurse, it has been disturbing to see first-hand how few NYPD officers (present en masse at ALL peaceful protests) are wearing the face masks that we know are preventing the spread of COVID-19. Demonstrators are taking this extremely seriously and I saw NYPD literally laugh in the face of a protester who asked why they do not. It is negligent and a blatant provocation -especially in the context of the over-policing of Black and Latinx communities for social distancing violations. The complete disregard of the NYPD for the safety of the people they purportedly protect and serve, the active attacks with tear gas and pepper spray in the midst of a respiratory pandemic, is appalling and unacceptable. Aaron Abrams | Brooklyn, New York I will try to keep these testimonies as precise as possible since I know your office likely has hundreds, if not thousands to go through. Three separate occasions highlighted below: First Incident - May 30th - Brooklyn - peaceful protestors were walking from Prospect Park through the streets early in the day. At one point, police stopped to block the street and asked that we back up.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    BRAVE JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2020 MELINDA KATZ DISTRICT ATTORNEY Queens District Attorney 125-01 Queens Boulevard Kew Gardens, NY 11415 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 MESSAGE FROM DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELINDA KATZ A MESSAGE FROM DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELINDA KATZ 2020 was a year like no other. From the start, I knew it would take a steady hand to achieve brave justice and create a more equitable criminal justice system while keeping Queens’ communities safe. On day one, my team and I effectuated new policies, practices and structures designed to create the safest and fairest borough in the city. We immediately began navigating through the challenging implementation of New York State’s long awaited historic bail and discovery reform. I could not have anticipated the challenges to come: those already tumultuous waters deepened in just three months’ time, as a world-wide pandemic hit the city. And not long after, our city transformed yet again in the wake of historic protests and calls for meaningful police reform. This past year, we bravely rose above the turbulent waters. We began building bridges – bridges that will keep our communities safe while embracing new, progressive approaches toward prosecution and the criminal justice system. Inside this book, we will explore the remarkable bridge building we have started, in what has proven to be an unparalleled year: A bridge to Trust – where an emphasis is placed on new progressive leadership, staff training, and a demand for excellence and professionalism throughout a newly structured organization that is designed to further our mission to achieve brave justice. A bridge to Fairness – by instituting new policies that work to address racial and economic disparities, such as reducing prosecution of low-level offenses, utilizing alternatives to cash bail, reducing incarceration, making fair and just plea agreements, and providing more opportunities for rehabilitation and redemption from past violations.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL CRIME BRIEF 2020 Singapore Remains One of the Safest Cities in the World
    POLICE NEWS RELEASE _________________________________________________________________ ANNUAL CRIME BRIEF 2020 Singapore Remains One of the Safest Cities in the World Overall Crime Rate increased due to rise in scam cases Singapore remains one of the safest cities in the world. Singapore was ranked first in the Gallup’s 2020 Global Law and Order report for the seventh consecutive year, with 97% of residents reporting that they felt safe walking home alone in their neighbourhood at night, as compared to an average of 69% worldwide.1 The World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index 2020 also ranked Singapore first for order and security.2 2. In 2020, the total number of reported crimes increased by 6.5% to 37,409 cases, from 35,115 cases in 2019. The Overall Crime Rate also increased, with 658 cases per 100,000 population in 2020, compared to 616 cases per 100,000 population in 2019.3 3. The increase in the number of reported crimes was due to a rise in scam cases. In particular, online scams saw a significant increase as Singaporeans carried out more online transactions due to the COVID-19 situation. 4 Please see Annex A for the statistics on the top ten scam types. 4. If scam cases were excluded, the total number of reported crimes in 2020 would have decreased by 15.3% to 21,653 from 25,570 in 2019. Decrease in physical crimes and more crime-free days 5. There was a decrease in physical crimes in 2020. 201 days were free from three confrontational crimes, namely snatch theft, robbery and housebreaking, an increase of 23 days compared to 178 days in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Background Check Procedures
    Shaping the future of international education New Edition Criminal Background Check Procedures CIS in collaboration with other agencies has formed an International Task Force on Child Protection chaired by CIS Executive Director, Jane Larsson, in order to apply our collective resources, expertise, and partnerships to help international school communities address child protection challenges. Member Organisations of the Task Force: • Council of International Schools • Council of British International Schools • Academy of International School Heads • U.S. Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools • Association for the Advancement of International Education • International Schools Services • ECIS CIS is the leader in requiring police background check documentation for Educator and Leadership Candidates as part of the overall effort to ensure effective screening. Please obtain a current police background check from your current country of employment/residence as well as appropriate documentation from any previous country/countries in which you have worked. It is ultimately a school’s responsibility to ensure that they have appropriate police background documentation for their Educators and CIS is committed to supporting them in this endeavour. It is important to demonstrate a willingness and effort to meet the requirement and obtain all of the paperwork that is realistically possible. This document is the result of extensive research into governmental, law enforcement and embassy websites. We have tried to ensure where possible that the information has been obtained from official channels and to provide links to these sources. CIS requests your help in maintaining an accurate and useful resource; if you find any information to be incorrect or out of date, please contact us at: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, Table Comments by Country
    UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1998 - 2000 Comments by Table 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources Alternative reference date to 31 December POLICE 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources Alternative reference date to 31 December England & Wales 30 September Japan 1 April 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes What is (are) the source(s) of the data provided in this table? Australia Recorded Crime Statistics 2000 (cat: 4510.0) Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Azerbaijan Reports on crimes Barbados Royal Barbados Police Force, Research and Development Department Bulgaria Ministry of Interior - Regular Report Canada Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Uniform Crime Report and Homicide Survey, Statistics Canada. Chile S.I.E.C (Sistema Integrado Estadistico de Carabineros) Colombia Policia Nacional, Direccion Central de Policia Judicial, Centro de Investigaciones Criminologicas Côte d'Ivoire Direction Centrale de la police Judiciaire Czech Republic Recording and Statistical System of Crime maintained by the Police of the Czech Republic Denmark Statistics of reported crimes, National Commissioner of Police, Department E. Dominica Criminal Records Office Friday, March 19, 2004 Page 1 of 22 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime includi What is (are) the source(s) of the data provided in this table? England & Wales Recorded crime database Finland Statistics Finland: Yearbook of Justice Statistics (SVT) Georgia Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public
    The Civil Rights Implications of "Broken Windows" Policing in NYC and General NYPD Accountability to the Public A Briefing Report of the New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights March 2018 Advisory Committees to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights By law, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory Committee in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. These Committees are composed of state/district citizens who serve without compensation; they are tasked with advising the Commission of civil rights issues in their states/district that are within the Commission’s jurisdiction. Committees are authorized to advise the Commission in writing of any knowledge or information they have of any alleged deprivation of voting rights and alleged discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or in the administration of justice; advise the Commission on matters of their state or district’s concern in the preparation of Commission reports to the President and the Congress; receive reports, suggestions, and recommendations from individuals, public officials, and representatives of public and private organizations to Committee inquiries; forward advice and recommendations to the Commission, as requested; and observe any open hearing or conference conducted by the Commission in their states/district. Acknowledgements The New York Advisory Committee thanks all of the participants in the March 20 and 21, 2017 briefings for sharing their expertise. The Committee also thanks the senior leadership of the NYPD for taking the time to share their expertise with us on the several days of interviews we conducted with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:21-Cv-00533 Document 1 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 85
    Case 1:21-cv-00533 Document 1 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 85 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X ADAMA SOW, DAVID JAKLEVIC, ALEXANDRA DE MUCHA PINO, OSCAR RIOS, BARBARA ROSS, MATTHEW BREDDER, SABRINA ZURKUHLEN, MARIA SALAZAR, DARA PLUCHINO, and SAVITRI DURKEE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION - against - COMPLAINT CITY OF NEW YORK; MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO; JURY DEMAND NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER DERMOT SHEA, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIEF OF No. 21-cv-533 DEPARTMENT TERENCE MONAHAN; NYPD DETECTIVE EDWARD CARRASCO (SHIELD NO. 1567); NYPD OFFICER TALHA AHMAD (SHIELD NO. 21358); NYPD OFFICER KEVIN AGRO (SHIELD NO. 8054); NYPD OFFICERS JOHN and JANE DOES # 1- 40, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X Plaintiffs, ADAMA SOW, DAVID JAKLEVIC, ALEXANDRA DE MUCHA PINO, OSCAR RIOS, BARBARA ROSS, MATTHEW BREDDER, SABRINA ZURKUHLEN, MARIA SALAZAR, DARA PLUCHINO, and SAVITRI DURKEE, (collectively herein “Plaintiffs” or “Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, by and through their attorneys, Beldock Levine & Hoffman LLP; Gideon Orion Oliver; Cohen & Green P.L.L.C.; and Wylie Stecklow PLLC, as and for their Complaint, allege as follows: Case 1:21-cv-00533 Document 1 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 85 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems
    WORLD FACTBOOK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS SINGAPORE Mahesh Nalla Michigan State University This country report is one of many prepared for the World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems under Bureau of Justice Statistics grant No. 90-BJ-CX-0002 to the State University of New York at Albany. The project director was Graeme R. Newman, but responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in each report is that of the individual author. The contents of these reports do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the U. S. Department of Justice. GENERAL OVERVIEW I. Political system. Singapore is a city/nation with a population of 2.6 million. 77% of its population are Chinese, 15%, Malays, and 6%, Indian. The four official languages of Singapore are English, Mandarin Chinese, Malay, and Tamil. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). The Republic of Singapore is a parliamentary government patterned after the English Westminster model. The constitution provides the structure and organization of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). 2. Legal system The legal system in Singapore is adversarial in nature. English common law was superimposed on the existing Malay customary law and Muslim law. Consequently, the legal system in Singapore can be characterized as pluralistic. While the dominant common law which shaped the Singapore legal system applies to all segments of the population, Muslim law governs the Muslim community in religious and matrimonial matters. Muslim law is administered in accordance with the Administration of Muslim Law Act, Cap.42.
    [Show full text]
  • MID-YEAR CRIME STATISTICS 2021 Overall Crime Situation for January to June 2021
    POLICE NEWS RELEASE _________________________________________________________________ MID-YEAR CRIME STATISTICS 2021 Overall Crime Situation for January to June 2021 Overall crime increased, largely due to a rise in scam cases In the first half of 2021, the total number of reported crimes increased by 11.2% to 19,444 cases, from 17,492 cases in the same period in 2020. 2. This increase was largely due to a rise in scam cases, which rose by 16.0% to 8,403 cases in 2021, from 7,247 cases in the same period last year. In contrast, there was a 108.8% increase in scam cases in 2020, when scam cases jumped from 3,470 cases in the first half of 2019 to 7,247 cases in the same period in 2020; 27.1% increase in 2019; and 19.5% increase in 2018.The rate of increase this year has been reduced noticeably. 3. Excluding scams, the total number of reported crimes in the first half of the year rose by 7.8% to 11,041 in 2021, from 10,245 in the same period in 2020. This increase was partly due to a lower number of crimes, excluding scams, reported during the Circuit Breaker in 2020, when many activities were restricted. For the same period in 2019, there were 12,770 reported cases of crimes excluding scams. 4. Despite this effect of the Circuit Breaker, there was still a decrease of more than 400 cases reported in two broad crime classes – housebreaking and related crimes, and theft and related crimes – in the first half of 2021 compared with the same period in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Library Resource
    The Heartbeat of the Community: Becoming a Police Chaplain Reverend Doctor Melissa Baker Bachelor of Ministry (Morling) Diploma of Theology (Morling) Master of Education (Adult) (UTS) 2009 Doctor of Education University of Technology, Sydney Certificate of Authorship/Originality I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of Candidate ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere thanks to those who have brought me through the academic process over the years of completing my Doctor of Education at the University of Technology, Sydney (2004-2009). Thank you Professor Alison Lee for having the confidence in me to complete this higher degree, building in me the writing tools necessary and inspiring me to critically analyse professional practice. I am deeply indebted to my Principal Supervisor, Dr Shirley Saunders. Without her insight, editorial acuity and overall guidance, this thesis would not be what it is. I also appreciate the encouragement and feedback of my Co- Supervisor, Dr Tony Holland, and for putting forth the idea to work with this project that has shaped the course of my future. Special thanks go to the Senior Chaplains Conference and NSW Police Force for approving the research and for the participants that have been part of the study in New South Wales, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]