Pomace Brandy Quality of Cultivar Riesling White from Kutjevo Vinegrowing Region S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pomace Brandy Quality of Cultivar Riesling White from Kutjevo Vinegrowing Region S 917 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21 (No 5) 2015, 917-925 Agricultural Academy POMACE BRANDY QUALITY OF CULTIVAR RIESLING WHITE FROM KUTJEVO VINEGROWING REGION S. JAKOBOVIĆ1 and M. JAKOBOVIĆ2 1 Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for Scientific and Artistic Work, Pozega, 34000 Požega, Croatia 2Polytechnic in Pozega, 34000 Pozega, Croatia Abstract JAKOBOVIĆ, S. and M. JAKOBOVIĆ, 2015. Pomace brandy quality of cultivar Riesling White from Kutjevo vinegrowing region. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 21: 917–925 The research on pomace brandy from grape pomace cultivar Riesling White from Kutjevo vinegrowing region was con- ducted in the year 2004. The experiment with pomace obtained after pressing mash (pomace K) was set in five variants with three repetitions (pomace fermentation with epiphyt microflora, fermentation of pomace supplemented with yeast, treatment of pomace before boiling with commercial preparation of pectolitic enzymes – three different enzymes). Two series of experi- ments were carried out in the year 2005: pomace obtained after pressing mash (series K) and pomace remaining after sepa- ration of the free-run juice (series J). In that year with two main variants (pomace fermentation with epiphyt microflora and fermentation of pomace supplemented with yeast), the experiment of pomace treatment with one of the applied preparations of pectolitic enzymes was repeated. The analysis of the chemical composition of pomace brandy comprised the determination of the alcohol, the total titratable acidity, the share of ester and the share of total aldehydes, the concentration of methanol, n-propanol, isobutanol, 2-butanol, isoamyl alcohol, n-hexanol, ethyl acetate and ethyl lactate. Based on the average values of basic chemical compounds, pomace brandies of all experimental variants obtained from Riesling White pomace in the year 2004 and 2005 satisfied the criteria of quality according to the Pravilnik o jakim alkoholnim i alkoholnim pićima and regula- tory rules, Definition, Description and Presentation of Spirit Drinks: Council Regulation No 1576/89, with the exception of pomace brandies produced in the year 2005 from pressed pomace fermented with epiphytic yeasts, as well as brandies of the same pomace treated with pectolitic enzyme before fermentation conducted with epiphyt yeasts. In these pomace brandies methanol concentration was above the allowed marginal values. The chemical composition of pomace brandies differed sig- nificantly in particular years as well as in relation to the experimental series. Key words: pomace brandy, pomace, pectolitic enzymes, distillation, methanol Introduction mash and wine. Pomace consists of solid parts of grapes in which the proportion of seeds is around 25%, skins 50% and Pomace brandy, brandy produced by the distillation of fer- stems around 25% (Silva et al., 2000).The factors important mented grape marc is of distinctive sensory properties and for the quality of pomace are health status and the degree chemical composition that distinguish it from the beverages of grape ripeness (Da Porto and Zironi, 1997; Silva et al., obtained by the distillation of wine, as well as those produced 2000), aromatic properties of cultivars (Versini, 1992a), as by the distillation of fermented crushed grapes. The compo- well as the technology of vinification (Radovanovic, 1986; sition and sensory properties of brandy result from the spe- Paunovic and Danicic, 1967; Paunovic and Djurisic, 1983; Da cific structure of pomace, its chemical and microbiological Porto and Zironi, 1997; Silva et al., 2000; Cortés et al., 2005; composition which is different from the composition of the Apostolopoulou et al., 2005). In accordance with the regu- E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 918 S. Jakobović and M. Jakobović lations (Pravilnik o jakim alkoholnim i alkoholnim pićima; lou et al., 2005) the degree of grape ripeness (Apostolopoulou Definition, Description and Presentation of Spirit Drinks: et al., 2005), the strength of the pressing and prolonged storage Council Regulation No 1576/89), pomace brandy must con- of pomace (Cortés et al., 2005). Increased concentrations of tain at least 37.5% vol. of alcohol, volatile matter content of at amyl alcohols (described as “alcoholic,” “sweet” and “suffo- least 140 g/hl a.a. and methanol up to 1000 g/hl a.a. The share cating” aromas) could have negative influence on the distillate of ethanol is of the key importance for the flavor and body of aroma, as reported by Apostolopoulou et al. (2005). pomace brandy, however, it contributes a little to its aroma According to the same source, 1-hexanol is considered to (Silva et al., 2000). The share of alcohol in Italian grappa is at positively influence the aroma of distillate if its concentrations least 37.5% vol., but it usually reaches 50% vol. (Versini and are lower than 20 mg/l. High concentrations of 1-hexanol se- Odello, 1990). Methanol is the natural ingredient of brandies riously damage the sensory properties of distillates and are produced from grape. Because of its toxicity, concentration associated with “green” scents (Cantagrel et al., 1995). The of methanol in the spirit drinks is limited by regulations. Var- presence of 2-butanol is considered harmful to the quality of ious factors that affect the concentration of methanol in grape the pomace brandy due to the unpleasant smell which is asso- marc have been reported in professional literature. They are ciated with this alcohol (Silva et al., 1996). The total concen- associated with the cultivar (Versini, 1992a), the intensity of tration of higher alcohols in the pomace brandies studied by action of pectolitic enzymes (Silva et al., 2000), pH levels (Da Paunovic and Đurisic (1983) ranged from 2220 to 6930 mg/l Porto, 1997), the structure of mash and the share of the liquid a.a., depending on the composition of pomace and fermenta- phase (Paunovic and Djurisic, 1981), boundary of separating tion conditions. Portuguese brandies had an average concen- the first distillate flow (Silva and Malcata, 1999), as well as tration of total higher alcohols from 1876.4 mg/l, Spanish oru- the effective separation of the last distillate flow (Apostolo- jo 1939 mg/l and Italian grappa 1799 mg/l (Silva et al., 2000) poulou et al., 2005). using the same sequence for the displayed alcohol strength of The data on the concentration of methanol in pomace 45 ± 4. 5% vol., 58.1% vol., and 72.9 ± 7.7% volume. The con- brandy vary widely. The share of methanol in Greek pomace centration of 2-butanol in pomace brandy from Spain ranged brandy (tsipuro), produced by traditional methods in small from 0.00 to 16.9 mg/l for home-produced, while in industrial households, was from 86 to 143 mg% ml a.a. (Apostolopou- it was 0.00 to 44.9 mg/l (Cortés et al., 2005). In pomace bran- lou et al., 2005). Silva et al. (2000) provided a comparative dies produced in industrial conditions the concentration of overview of the chemical composition of Portuguese, Span- 2-butanol ranged from 80 to 946 mg/l (Paunovic and Đurisic, ish and Italian pomace brandies according to which the con- 1983).Concentrations of 1-hexanol in industrial pomace bran- centration of methanol in Portuguese pomace brandy was dies ranged from 0.00 to 133 mg/l (Cortés et al., 2005). 3389.2 ± 1279.9 mg/l; in Spanish orujo 5169 mg/l; in Ital- Among comparatively analyzed pomace brandies the ian grappa 8869.2 ± 4338.3 mg/l, with the alcohol content of highest 1-hexanol content of 162 mg/l was found in orujo 45 ± 4.5% vol. in Portuguese pomace brandy, 58.1% vol. in (Silva et al., 2000). Low concentrations of this alcohol (0.9 mg Spanish oruje and 72.9 ± 7.7% vol. in Italian grappa. The in- % ml a.a.) were reported for Greek brandies (Apostolopoulou creased methanol content (more than 2% vol.) can be found in et al., 2005).There is relatively little data on the movement of pomace brandies produced in industrial conditions, which is the total acidity of pomace brandy in contemporary profes- explained as a consequence of the strong pressing of pomace sional literature. The average concentration of organic acids using continuous presses or prolonged storage of fermented in the experimental pomace brandy produced in laboratory pomace during which a loss of alcohol occurred (Paunovic conditions was 0.17 g/l, and in pomace brandies produced in and Djurisic, 1983). industrial conditions 0.45 g/l (Paunovic and Djurisic, 1983). Cortés et al. (2005) reported that industrial pomace brandy Recognizable level of acetic acid was 200 mg/l (Diéguez et produced ​​from pomace pressed in a pneumatic press, had sev- al., 2002).Ethyl acetate ester is the most important ester with en times higher concentration of methanol (an average of 5303 respect to its intense smell and has a significant impact on the mg/l with 63.8% vol. of alcohol) from the pomace brandy pro- sensory properties of distillate (Silva et al., 1996; Apostolo- duced in small households from pomace obtained by manual poulou, 2005).The increased concentration of this ester indi- pressing of mash which contained an average of 704 mg/l of cates prolonged storage of pomace and possible acetic acid methanol with an average 52.7% vol. of alcohol. Most of the bacteria contamination. The data on the proportion of ethyl higher alcohols are formed in alcohol fermentation by yeasts acetate in pomace brandy vary. The concentration of ethyl and they are formed parallel with the formation of ethanol acetate in Portuguese pomace brandies ranged from 50.4 to (Jackson, 1994). The share of hexanol in the distillate is con- 528 mg/l with an average concentration of 210 mg/l which, nected with the varietal origin, (Versini, 1992a; Apostolopou- according to Silva et al. (1996), can be considered relatively Pomace Brandy Quality of Cultivar Riesling White from Kutjevo Vinegrowing Region 919 low for brandies.
Recommended publications
  • Serbian: an Essential Grammar
    Contents Serbian An Essential Grammar Serbian: An Essential Grammar is an up to date and practical reference guide to the most important aspects of Serbian as used by contemporary native speakers of the language. This book presents an accessible description of the language, focusing on real, contemporary patterns of use. The Grammar aims to serve as a reference source for the learner and user of Serbian irrespective of level, by setting out the complexities of the language in short, readable sections. It is ideal for independent study or for students in schools, colleges, universities and all types of adult classes. Features of this Grammar include: • use of Cyrillic and Latin script in plentiful examples throughout • a cultural section on the language and its dialects • clear and detailed explanations of simple and complex grammatical concepts • detailed contents list and index for easy access to information. Lila Hammond has been teaching Serbian both in Serbia and the UK for over twenty-five years and presently teaches at the Defence School of Languages, Beaconsfield, UK. i Routledge Essential Grammars Contents Essential Grammars are available for the following languages: Chinese Danish Dutch English Finnish Modern Greek Modern Hebrew Hungarian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Serbian Spanish Swedish Thai Urdu Other titles of related interest published by Routledge: Colloquial Croatian Colloquial Serbian ii Contents Serbian An Essential Grammar Lila Hammond iii First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Direct Wine Shipper Tax Return Tax Determination Summary
    FORM MARYLAND DIRECT WINE SHIPPER 2012 315 TAX RETURN 123150049 Direct Wine Shipper’s Name Federal Employer ID Number (FEIN) - Office Use Only Street Address Check Number __________ Amount $ _____________ City State ZIP code Deposit Date____________ E-mail Address Direct Wine Shipper’s Permit Number For Calendar Quarter January – March April – June DW- July – September October - December TAX DETERMINATION SUMMARY OF WINE / POMACE BRANDY SALES TO CONSUMERS IN MARYLAND DURING REPORT QUARTER I. TOTAL NUMBER OF GALLONS OF WINE SOLD TO CONSUMERS – TAX CALCULATION Convert Total Liters to Total Gallons by conversion factor of 0.264. One liter = 0.264 gallons. For example, one case of 750 ml bottles (12 bottles per case) = 9 liters x 0.264 = 2.376 gallons. 1. Conversion Calculation: Total Liters Sold by Case or Bottle: _________ x 0.264 = _________ Total Gallons Sold 2. Total Gallons Sold (from line 1):. .2. _____________ 3. Adjustments:. 3. _____________ 4. Net Gallons subject to alcoholic beverage tax (line 2 plus or minus line 3) . .4. _____________ 5. Wine tax per gallon. 5. x .40 6. WINE TAX DUE (multiply line 4 by line 5). .6. $ _____________ II. ToTAL NUmbER of GALLONS of PomACE BRANDY soLD TO CONSUMERS - TAX CALCULATIONS Convert Total Liters to Total Gallons by conversion factor of 0.264. One liter = 0.264 gallons. For example, one case of 750 ml bottles (12 bottles per case) = 9 liters x 0.264 = 2.376 gallons. 7. Conversion Calculation: Total Liters Sold by Case or Bottle: _________ x 0.264 = _________ Total Gallons Sold 8. Total Gallons Sold (from line 7):.
    [Show full text]
  • Orujo De Hierbas (Pomace Brandy)
    ALQUITARAS DE CAZALLA, S.L. C/SAN BENITO, 8 41.370 CAZALLA DE LA SIERRA. SEVILLE LABORATORIOS MICROAL, S. L. ASP.GEN.5. VERSION 01 DATE OF ISSUE: 12/09/2012 TECHNICAL DATA SHEET: ORUJO DE HIERBAS (POMACE BRANDY) TRADE NAME OF THE LICOR DE ORUJO DE HIERBAS DE CAZALLA (CAZALLA HERB PRODUCT POMACE BRANDY LIQUEUR) PRODUCT CATEGORY AGUARDIENTE COMPUESTO (COMPOUND POMACE BRANDY) QUALITATIVE COMPOSITION Galician aguardiente de orujo distilled in rectified stills in the Galician distillery, 45º alcohol content, six types of herbs, sugar and softened water. TREATMENT Water and herbs are added to the aguardiente and left to macerate for 21 days, shaking from time to time. Once the maceration has finished, sugar is added, and it is beaten together. The result is then filtered and bottled semi-automatically. The end product has a 30º alcohol content. REGISTERED TRADEMARK EL CLAVEL. PRESENTATION FORMATS In bottles. PACKAGING Glass bottles of 0.5 litres. LABELLING The label contains the mandatory information required by RD 1334/99 and subsequent amendments. - Name of the beverage. - Expression of “Aguardiente compuesto de hierbas” ("Compound herb pomace brandy”) - Packer-bottler number. - Alcohol content by volume in centesimal degrees (GL). - Volume of the contents expressed in litres or fractions. - Name or registered name and address of the processing company. - RS number of the company. - “Made in Spain” mention. - Batch identification. It will also bear the official marking (fiscal marking of the Special Tax on Alcohols). BATCHING SYSTEM A numeric six-digit system corresponding to the bottling, beginning with the letter L. The first two digits correspond to the day, the next two to the month and the last two are the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Mi Ada Liq Brand Name Proof Size Pack Base Licensee Minimum New/ # Code in Ml Price Price Shelf Chng Price American Blend
    MI ADA LIQ BRAND NAME PROOF SIZE PACK BASE LICENSEE MINIMUM NEW/ # CODE IN ML PRICE PRICE SHELF CHNG PRICE AMERICAN BLEND 221 9825 ALIBI 90.0 750 12 23.49 22.32 26.31 221 1664 ARISTOCRAT BLENDED WHISKEY 80.0 1000 12 7.32 6.95 8.19 321 127 BANKER'S CLUB BLEND 80.0 750 12 5.75 5.46 6.44 321 121 BANKER'S CLUB BLEND 80.0 1000 12 7.12 6.75 7.96 321 128 BANKER'S CLUB BLEND 80.0 1750 6 12.49 11.87 13.99 321 287 BEAM'S 8 STAR BLEND 80.0 750 12 6.07 5.76 6.79 321 89830 BEAM'S 8 STAR BLEND 80.0 1000 12 7.59 7.20 8.49 321 288 BEAM'S 8 STAR BLEND 80.0 1750 6 12.93 12.29 14.49 321 283 BEAM'S 8 STAR BLEND PL 80.0 375 24 3.20 3.05 3.59 321 10301 BREUCKELEN 77 WHISKEY RYE-CORN 90.0 750 6 44.63 42.41 50.00 321 987 CALVERT EXTRA 80.0 750 12 8.03 7.62 8.99 321 988 CALVERT EXTRA 80.0 1750 6 16.95 16.11 18.99 321 1507 CARSTAIRS WHITE SEAL 80.0 750 12 5.70 5.42 6.39 321 932 CARSTAIRS WHITE SEAL 80.0 1000 12 7.28 6.91 8.15 321 1508 CARSTAIRS WHITE SEAL 80.0 1750 6 11.95 11.36 13.39 321 2607 FLEISCHMANN'S PREFERRED 80.0 750 12 5.62 5.32 6.28 321 2608 FLEISCHMANN'S PREFERRED 80.0 1750 6 11.95 11.36 13.39 321 7380 FLEISCHMANN'S PREFERRED PL 80.0 750 12 5.62 5.32 6.28 321 3107 G & W FIVE STAR 80.0 750 12 5.80 5.50 6.49 321 3101 G & W FIVE STAR 80.0 1000 12 7.59 7.20 8.49 321 3108 G & W FIVE STAR 80.0 1750 6 12.49 11.87 13.99 321 93610 G & W FIVE STAR PL 80.0 200 48 2.10 1.98 2.34 321 3103 G & W FIVE STAR PL 80.0 375 24 3.30 3.13 3.69 321 3097 G & W FIVE STAR PL 80.0 750 12 5.80 5.50 6.49 321 3147 G & W SEVEN STAR 80.0 750 12 8.03 7.62 8.99 321 3148 G & W SEVEN STAR
    [Show full text]
  • Beverage Formula Seminar
    BEVERAGE FORMULA SEMINAR Formulation Team Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division TTB May 3, 2006 AGENDA • Advertising, Labeling & Formulation Division (ALFD) • Basics of TTB Formulation • Wine • Distilled Spirits • Malt Beverage WHERE DOES ALFD FIT IN TTB? John Manfreda Administrator Vicky I. McDowell Deputy Administrator Cheri Mitchell Bill Foster Mary Ryan Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator (Management) (Headquarters Operations) (Field Operations) Advertising Labeling and National Revenue Formulation Division Center Regulations and Rulings Tax Audit Division Division International Trade Trade Investigations Division Division Scientific Services Division Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division Division Director ALFD Karen Freelove (202) 927-8087 Technical Advisor Division Admin. Asst. Ed Reisman Joyce Rose (202) 927-8485 Assistant Director Assistant Director Supervisory Mgmt Assistant Director Teresa Knapp Vacant Analyst Susan Weil Wine Labeling Market Compliance Donna Smith Formulation/DS&MB Office Office Info. Tech Office Labeling Offices (202) 927-1975 (202) 927-8136 (202) 927-8107 (202) 927-8122 Customer Service Program Manager Program Analysts Program Manager Specialists 1 2 1 2 Customer Service Formula Specialists Market Compliance Specialist 3 QA Specialists Specialists 1 2 5 (one vacancy) QA Specialist ITT Specialist 1 Label Specialists 1 Customer Service 1 1 Clerks Specialist 3 (one vacancy) 1 Administrative Asst. 1 Label Specialists 3 ALFD Contact Information • Mailing Address
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Workbook 2019 Answer
    Answer Key Note: Page numbers refer to the workbook Chapter One: Spirit Production Page 7 (Exercise 1: The Production of Distilled Spirits: Fill in the Blank/Short Answer) 1. Ethanol/ethyl alcohol 2. Typically, a person may consume a potable form of alcohol in moderation without suffering any undesirable effects 3. Grapes, other fruit, honey, sugarcane, molasses 4. Rice, potatoes, grains, (agave) 5. 212°F (100°C) 6. 173°F (78°C) 7. They dissolve in one another 8. 96.5% Page 8 (Exercise 2: The Production of Distilled Spirits: Matching) 1. Wash 7. Proof 2. Dehydration 8. Heart 3. Congeners 9. Lees 4. Vaporization 10. Tails 5. Tails 11. Heads 6. Heads 12. Cut Points Page 9 (Exercise 3: The Pot Still Diagram) 1. Water source 5. Wash inlet 2. Worm condenser 6. Still head 3. Cooling water 7. Copper pot 4. Swan’s neck 8. Collecting safe Page 10 (Exercise 4: Types of Stills: Matching) 1. Pot still 8. Hydroselector 2. Brouillis 9. Rectifier 3. Low wines 10. Hybrid still 4. Reflux 11. Downcomer 5. Patent still 12. Aeneas Coffey 6. Analyzer 13. Multiple Column Still 7. Robert Stein 14. Lyne Arm Page 11 (Exercise 5: The Column Still Diagram) 1. High alcohol product take-off 2. Condenser 3. 50% abv product take-off 4. 10% abv product take-off 5. Boiler 6. Liquid return 7. Wash feed 8. Analyzer-rectifying section 9. Analyzer-stripping section 10. Reflux tube 1 Page 12 (Exercise 6: The Hybrid Still Diagram) 1. Condenser 5. Heat source 2. Alcohol/water vapor 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Klassifikation Vid De Nordiska Alkoholmonopolen En Jämförande Undersökning Av Fem Statliga Alkoholföretags Hemsidor
    KANDIDATUPPSATS I BIBLIOTEKS- OCH INFORMATIONSVETENSKAP VID INSTITUTIONEN BIBLIOTEKS- OCH INFORMATIONSVETENSKAP/BIBLIOTEKSHÖGSKOLAN 2011:15 Klassifikation vid de nordiska alkoholmonopolen En jämförande undersökning av fem statliga alkoholföretags hemsidor Sisältää suomenkielisen tiivistelmän Með íslensku samantekt JOAKIM LILLJEGREN © Författaren Mångfaldigande och spridande av innehållet i denna uppsats – helt eller delvis – är förbjudet utan medgivande. Svensk titel: Klassifikation vid de nordiska alkoholmonopolen: En jämförande undersökning av fem statliga alkoholföretags hemsidor Engelsk titel: Classification at the Nordic alcohol monopolies: A comparative study of the web pages of five state-owned alcohol companies Författare: Joakim Lilljegren Färdigställt: 2011 Handledare: Katarina Michnik och Lars Seldén Abstract: This thesis deals with the goods classification of the Nordic alcohol monopolies, viz. Alko in Finland, Rúsdrekkasøla Landsins in the Faroe Islands, Systembolaget in Sweden, Vínbúðin in Iceland, and Vinmonopolet in Norway. The focus of the study is the web pages of the companies (as they appeared April 10th 2011) and the printed price catalogue of Alko, from which information on class division has been excerpted. The emphasis lies on the division into product groups and the information about origin. Within these facets, which partly overlap in some of the classification systems, the principles of division and the hierarchical relations between classes are studied. The systems have different degrees of specificity and many external dissimilarities, but they are all based on the same principles of division, which could be called production method, raw material, origin, and alcohol content. In general the systems are hierarchically well constructed, but some deviations occur, which might affect the information retrieval negatively. The study concludes with suggestions on how the companies could improve their classification systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Karakterizacija I Procjena Kvalitete Rakija "Biska"
    Karakterizacija i procjena kvalitete rakija "Biska" Rupert, Maja Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prehrambeno-biotehnološki fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:159:627482 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-04 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of the Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB FACULTY OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY GRADUATE THESIS Zagreb, July 2017 Maja Rupert 713/N CHARACTERIZATION AND QUALITY EVALUATION OF MISTLETOE SPIRITS Work was done in the Department of Food Engineering in the Laboratory for Fermentation and Yeast Technology at Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology at University of Zagreb under mentorship of Damir Stanzer, PhD, associate professor at Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology at University of Zagreb with help from Jasna Mrvčić, PhD, associate professor at Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology at University of Zagreb, Jasenka Gajdoš Kljusurić, PhD, full professor at Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology at University of Zagreb and Karla Hanousek Čiča, mag.ing.biotechn, assistant at Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology at University of Zagreb. Work was done in the Department of Chemistry in the Laboratory for Food Chemistry and in the Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology in the Laboratory for Food Quality Evaluation at Warsaw University of Life Sciences under mentorship of Piotr Koczoń, PhD, professor at Warsaw University of Life Sciences and with help from Dorota Derewiaka, PhD, professor at Warsaw University of Life Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Formulation
    2009 TTB Expo Presentation Domestic Beverage Alcohol Formulation Presented by Stephen Robey, Formulation Specialist Overview • Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division (ALFD) • Basics of TTB Formulation • Wine • Distilled Spirits • Malt Beverage • Helpful Hints and Resources Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division ALFD’s Mission • Collect the Revenue: – Ensure proper tax classification • Protect the Public: – Verify safety of ingredients – Provide adequate consumer information – Prevent consumer deception Legal Authority • Federal Alcohol Administration Act • Alcohol Beverage Labeling Act of 1988 • Webb-Kenyon Act • Internal Revenue Code — Chapter 51 Laws and Regulations 27 CFR part 4 Labeling and advertising of wine 27 CFR part 5 Labeling and advertising of distilled spirits 27 CFR part 7 Labeling and advertising of malt beverages 27 CFR part 19 Distilled spirits plants 27 CFR part 24 Wine 27 CFR part 25 Beer ALFD Formulation Team • Gracie Joy, Assistant Director: – Roberta Sanders, Program Manager – Shonda Geddie, Formula Specialist – Michael Warren, Formula Specialist – Stephen Robey, Formula Specialist The Basics of Formulation Forms • Domestic wine — TTB F 5120.29 • Domestic distilled spirits — TTB F 5110.38 • Domestic malt beverage — Formula • In the future, all formulas should be submitted on a single form, TTB F 5100.51 Proposed TTB F 5100.51 • One form for all • Legal size paper • http://www.ttb.gov/for ms/f510051.pdf • Currently voluntary, but will be mandatory TTB F 5100.51 TTB F 5100.51 (Continued) Formulas Online
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Producing Grape-Based Alcoholic Drinks from Newly Created Grapevine Varieties
    Journal of Agricultural Sciences UDC: 663.5:634.8.076 Vol. 50, No 2, 2005 Original scientific paper Pages 183-191 POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCING GRAPE-BASED ALCOHOLIC DRINKS FROM NEWLY CREATED GRAPEVINE VARIETIES N. Nikićević,1 S. Jović1 and A. Petrović1 Abstract: The paper is concerned with investigations on the possibility of producing grape-based alcoholic drinks from newly created grapevine varieties, such as Riesling Italian, Seedling 14660, Muscat Hamburg and Godominka. All chemical parameters for produced grape brandies, marc brandies and wine distillates complied with standards of quality as prescribed by the Regulations for quality of alcoholic drinks. Organoleptic evaluation proved that Seedling 14660 produced best scored wine distillate (17.85), Muscat Hamburg and Godominka gave best scored grape brandy (18.25) and Godominka yielded best scored marc brandy (18.40). Sensory properties of assessed brandies and wine distillate indicate that aroma and quality are gaining in intensity and level of improvement, starting from wine distillate to marc brandies. Also, intensive fruity-floral aroma reminding of lily-of-the-valley and iris fragrance is evident. Key words: grape brandy, newly created varieties, wine distillate, Riesling Italian, Seedling 14660, Muscat Hamburg, Godominka, sensory quality. I n t r o d u c t i o n Yugoslavia, being a fruit and grapevine-producing country, possesses raw material resources to produce strong alcoholic drinks from grape. Grape brandy is manufactured by distilling fermented crushed whole grape fruit (where stalks were removed) of cultivated grapevine Vitis vinifera. As distinguished from grape brandy, marc brandy has been manufactured from times immemorial in grapevine-producing countries as well as in all grapevine-growing regions in our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Concours Mondial De Bruxelles 2012 | Wine Categories Concours Mondial De Bruxelles 2012 | Spirits Categories
    Concours Mondial de Bruxelles 2012 | Wine Categories Still Rosé Wines 1.1. Grand Duchy of Luxembourg 2.10.12. Sparkling wines from Hungary 2.10.13. aromatic varieties 4.2. Dry Rosé Wines <4 gr/l of residual sugar 1.1.1. Mexico 2.10.14. Rosé Wines >4 gr/l of residual sugar 1.1.2. New Zealand 2.10.15. White sparkling wines from aromatic varieties 4.2.1. Czech Republic white wine <10gl sugar 2.10.16. Rosé sparkling wines from aromatic varieties 4.2.2. Organic rosé Wine 1.6. Czech Republic white wine > 10g/l sugar 2.10.17. Slovakia 2.10.18. Organic Sparkling Wine 4.6. Organic rosé wine <10€ 1.6.1. Slovenia 2.10.19. Organic rosé wine >10€ 1.6.2. Switzerland Valais 2.10.20. Organic sparkling wine <10€ 4.6.1. Switzerland other regions 2.10.21. Organic sparkling wine >10€ 4.6.2. White wines from Turkey 2.10.22. non-aromatic varieties 2.1. USA 2.10.23. Other Sparkling Wines 4.10. Dry white wine <4 gr/l residual sugar 2.1.1. Red Wines 3.1. Sekt 4.10.1. Semi-dry wine <4,1 - 12> gr/l residual sugar 2.1.2. Crémant from Luxembourg 4.10.2. Sweet wines <12,1 - 50> gr/l residual sugar 2.1.3. Red wines <4 gr/l residual sugar 3.1.1. Other countries 4.10.3. Sweet wines > 50 gr/l residual sugar 2.1.4. Red wines >4 gr/l residual sugar 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Peruvian Pisco Grappa
    UNIT 2 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa Peruvian pisco Grappa Must rest in neutral casks Can be bottled after Aging a minimum of 3 months. distillation or aged in barrels. Only wine is distilled. Skins, pips A pomace brandy. The fermented skins, Use of stalks are discarded before seeds and stalks leftover from distillation. No water allowed. winemaking are distilled. No water pomace allowed. UNIT 1 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa Pomace/Marc UNIT 2 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa ● Peruvian pisco is usually distilled with a copper pot, direct flame heated. Sometimes a falca still is used. ● Grappa is distilled using double boiler (bain-marie) or steam distillation to prevent burning. ● Grappa is watered down after distillation to reach desired proof. Distilling grappa UNIT 2 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa Peruvian pisco Grappa Regions Made in one of the 5 pisco Made from Italian grapes & distilled in regions, from grapes grown in Italy, the Italian part of Switzerland or those regions. San Marino. Grape Made from any of the 8 Made from any grape varieties permitted by the variety used in wine-making. s D.O. in Peru. UNIT 2 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa Peruvian pisco Grappa Flavoring No flavoring or infusions Allows for flavoring or allowed during infusions production. post-distillation. Classifications None Classified according to its age, the grape or grapes from which the marc was obtained and, sometimes, the essences used to flavor it. UNIT 2 2 Lesson 6: Peruvian pisco vs. Grappa Grappa is classified according to its age, the grape or grapes from which the marc was obtained and, sometimes, the essences used to flavor it.
    [Show full text]