Part 2 (Afternoon)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Victims of Substantive Representation: How "Women's Interests" Influence the Career Paths of Mps in Canada (1997-2011)
The Victims of Substantive Representation: How "Women's Interests" Influence the Career Paths of MPs in Canada (1997-2011) by Susan Piercey A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Political Science Memorial University September, 2011 St. John's Newfoundland Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r&tirence ISBN: 978-0-494-81979-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-81979-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. -
SFU Thesis Template Files
The Right to Authentic Political Communication by Ann Elizabeth Rees M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2005 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1980 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Science Ann Elizabeth Rees 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Ann Elizabeth Rees Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: The Right to Authentic Political Communication Examining Committee: Chair: Katherine Reilly, Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor Alison Beale Supervisor Professor Andrew Heard Internal Examiner Associate Professor Political Science Department Paul Thomas External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: January 22, 2016 ii Abstract Increasingly, governments communicate strategically with the public for political advantage, seeking as Christopher Hood describes it to “avoid blame” and “claim credit” for the actions and decisions of governance. In particular, Strategic Political Communication (SPC) is becoming the dominant form of political communication between Canada’s executive branch of government and the public, both during elections and as part of a “permanent campaign” to gain and maintain public support as means to political power. This dissertation argues that SPC techniques interfere with the public’s ability to know how they are governed, and therefore undermines the central right of citizens in a democracy to legitimate elected representation by scrutinizing government and holding it to account. Realization of that right depends on an authentic political communication process that provides citizens with an understanding of government. By seeking to hide or downplay blameworthy actions, SPC undermines the legitimation role public discourse plays in a democracy. -
2015 Annual Report
ating Through Ch Navig ange Legislativeof Assembly Prince Edward Island January2015 1, 2015ANNUAL - December REPORT 31, 2015 Table of Contents: Navigating through change Our Values and Ethics 6 Clerk’s Message 7 Our History 9 Our Services 11 Our Team 15 Spotlight: A Move in the Making 16 Events 19 Community Engagement 29 Parliamentary Matters 32 2015 House Statistics 43 Legislative Assembly Budget and Expenses 44 Our Values and Ethics: Helping parliamentarians, under law, to serveDemocratic the public Valuesinterest. Serving with competence, excellence, efficiency,Professional objectivity, Values and impartiality. Acting at all times to upholdEthical the public Values trust. Demonstrating respect, fairness, and courtesy in our Peoplerelations Values with the public, colleagues, and fellow public servants. 6 8 Our History How It All Started Prince Edward Island’s government was not always led by one House of elected representatives; for roughly the first 120 years of Island governance, there were two legislative bodies, the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly. A two-body Legislature is known as a bicameral Legislature. PEI’s first Governor, Walter Patterson, was instructed to establish a House of Assembly in which representatives were popularly elected (unlike Council members, who were appointed). The combination of a Council and House was a requirement for the enactment of legislation under British law. Though Patterson became Governor in 1769, the first House of Assembly was not elected until 1773. Early sessions of the Assembly met in private homes and taverns. A Sergeant-at-Arms of the time commented that this made for a “damn queer parliament”. By 1825, the House of Assembly was working on establishing its rights and privileges, particularly in terms of self- regulation and authority. -
Core 1..40 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
House of Commons CANADA Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans FOPO Ï NUMBER 004 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 40th PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Wednesday, March 24, 2010 Chair Mr. Rodney Weston 1 Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans Wednesday, March 24, 2010 Ï (1545) Using past and present funding as a vantage point, I'd like to talk [English] to you about how Fisheries and Oceans Canada is well positioned to deliver on the government's priorities as they relate to our fishing The Chair (Mr. Rodney Weston (Saint John, CPC)): I call this industry. Since this government came into office in 2006, up to and meeting to order. including budget 2010, this government has committed nearly I'd like to begin by welcoming the minister here today, Minister $2.5 billion in new funding and an additional $190 million in Shea. ongoing annual funding for initiatives related to fleet renewal, fisheries science research, and small craft harbours, along with a Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to meet with number of other projects. This funding includes significant the committee once again. I know you're no stranger to the investments in the Canadian Coast Guard to purchase new ships committee and the members here. It's always a pleasure to have you and repair our existing fleet. before us. Minister, I know you're familiar with the procedures here. We generally allow about ten minutes for presentations. I believe you have an opening statement that you'd like to make before we proceed Significant investments have also been made towards construction to questioning from members. -
Back to Basics: Taxpayers Have Rights
Back to Basics: Taxpayers Have Rights Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman 1000-171 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5H7 Telephone: 613-946-2310 | Toll-free: 1-866-586-3839 Fax: 613-941-6319 | Toll-free fax: 1-866-586-3855 © Minister of Public Services and Procurement Canada 2020 Cat. No.: Rv10-20/2020E-PDF ISSN: 978-0-660-34758-5 This publication is available in electronic format at canada.ca/en/taxpayers-ombudsman Back to Basics: Taxpayers Have Rights Taxpayer Bill of Rights 1. You have the right to receive entitlements and to pay no more and no less than what is required by law. 2. You have the right to service in both official languages. 3. You have the right to privacy and confidentiality. 4. You have the right to a formal review and subsequent appeal. 5. You have the right to be treated professionally, courteously, and fairly.* 6. You have the right to complete, accurate, clear, and timely information.* 7. You have the right, unless otherwise provided by law, not to pay income tax amounts in dispute before you have had an impartial review. 8. You have the right to have the law applied consistently. 9. You have the right to lodge a service complaint and to be provided with an explanation of [the CRA’s] findings.* 10. You have the right to have the costs of compliance taken into account when administering tax legislation.* 11. You have the right to expect [the CRA] to be accountable.* 12. You have the right to relief from penalties and interest under tax legislation because of extraordinary circumstances. -
Falling Short: Suboptimal Outcomes in Canadian Defence Procurement
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-09-26 Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement MacMillan, Ian MacMillan, I. (2018). Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/33132 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108780 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Falling short: suboptimal outcomes in Canadian defence procurement by Ian MacMillan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2018 © Ian MacMillan 2018 Abstract Why do Canada’s military procurement projects often fall short of their primary goals? Otherwise known as a suboptimal result, defence acquisitions regularly fall short of established delivery schedules, accruing cost-overruns, sometimes resulting in cancellation of key materiel. One-hundred percent of the twenty-five Major Crown Projects at the Department of National Defence have experienced delays in achieving key milestones. Aside from cost, suboptimal results are injurious to Canada’s tri-force military. Fortunately, the matter has not gone unchecked. A fairly recent surge in procurement research has generated a critical mass of Canadian-focused literature. -
Seat Projection
www.ekospolitics.ca EKOS Seat Projection: Special thanks go to Earl Washburn and Graham Pressey, who were the principal investigators in creating this seat forecast. [Ottawa – October 19, 2015] With just hours to go until the polls close, EKOS is offering a seat projection based on what we believe to be perhaps the strongest riding prediction model extant at this time. We have been constantly refining our model which is populated with the nearly 130,000 cases we have collected since January. We have made a number of qualitative adjustments based on each riding’s history and candidates. Before digging into the numbers, we would like to provide two very important caveats: 1.) Our model assumes that our final numbers are accurate. There were a lot of last minute movements, particularly in Quebec. For example, our final poll had the Liberals at 36 points. However, the Liberals were clearly on an upward trend at the time our final poll was conducted and they could easily find themselves a few points higher this evening. With the large number of three- and four-way races in this country, a difference of one or two points could easily translate to a difference of 10 or 20 seats. 2.) There are a lot of close calls in Quebec. Many Quebec ridings are tight four-way races, meaning that many of these seats will be won with less than 30 per cent of the vote. With margins this thin, there is a very wide margin for error in terms of final seat tally. Also, there were a lot of late movements in the province, including a last minute surge in support for the Bloc Québécois. -
Mindbombs of Right and Wrong: Cycles of Contention in the Activist Campaign to Stop Canada's Seal Hunt
TSpace Research Repository tspace.library.utoronto.ca Mindbombs of right and wrong: cycles of contention in the activist campaign to stop Canada's seal hunt Peter Dauvergne and Kate J. Neville Version Post-Print/Accepted Manuscript Citation Dauvergne, P., & Neville, K.J. 2011. Mindbombs of right and wrong: (published version) cycles of contention in the activist campaign to stop Canada's seal hunt. Environmental Politics, 20(2): 192-209. Publisher’s Statement “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Politics on March 17, 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09644016.2011.551024.” How to cite TSpace items Always cite the published version, so the author(s) will receive recognition through services that track citation counts, e.g. Scopus. If you need to cite the page number of the TSpace version (original manuscript or accepted manuscript) because you cannot access the published version, then cite the TSpace version in addition to the published version using the permanent URI (handle) found on the record page. Mindbombs of Right and Wrong: Cycles of Contention in the Activist Campaign to Stop Canada’s Seal Hunt Peter Dauvergne and Kate J. Neville* Liu Institute for Global Issues, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Abstract Activists use emotional language and images – what Greenpeace co-founder Bob Hunter coined ‘mindbombs’ – to convince people that some actions are wrong, morally and environmentally. For over 50 years anti-sealing activists, for example, have employed mindbombs to transform seal pups into babies and seal hunters into barbarians. Although ‘image politics’ contributed to the decline of the Canadian sealing industry in the 1980s, its effectiveness has been – and continues to be – rocky, particularly as pro-sealing voices counter with competing claims of cultural rights, traditional livelihoods, and sustainable use. -
Seeing the Light: Report on Staffed Lighthouses in Newfoundland and Labrador and British Columbia
SEEING THE LIGHT: REPORT ON STAFFED LIGHTHOUSES IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR AND BRITISH COLUMBIA Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans The Honourable Fabian Manning, Chair The Honourable Elizabeth Hubley, Deputy Chair October 2011 (first published in December 2010) For more information please contact us by email: [email protected] by phone: (613) 990-0088 toll-free: 1 800 267-7362 by mail: Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: http://senate-senat.ca Ce rapport est également disponible en français. MEMBERSHIP The Honourable Fabian Manning, Chair The Honourable Elizabeth Hubley, Deputy Chair and The Honourable Senators: Ethel M. Cochrane Dennis Glen Patterson Rose-Marie Losier-Cool Rose-May Poirier Sandra M. Lovelace Nicholas Vivienne Poy Michael L. MacDonald Nancy Greene Raine Donald H. Oliver Charlie Watt Ex-officio members of the committee: The Honourable Senators James Cowan (or Claudette Tardif) Marjory LeBreton, P.C. (or Claude Carignan) Other Senators who have participated on this study: The Honourable Senators Andreychuk, Chaput, Dallaire, Downe, Marshall, Martin, Murray, P.C., Rompkey, P.C., Runciman, Nancy Ruth, Stewart Olsen and Zimmer. Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Library of Parliament: Claude Emery, Analyst Senate Committees Directorate: Danielle Labonté, Committee Clerk Louise Archambeault, Administrative Assistant ORDER OF REFERENCE Extract from the Journals of the Senate, Sunday, June -
Core 1..148 Hansard
House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 221 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, March 7, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 14699 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, March 7, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. United States of America, February 28-29, 2012; the 65th Annual Meeting of the Council of State Governments West, held in Edmonton, Alberta, July 20-23, 2012; the 78th Annual Meeting of the Southern Governors Association, held in Rio Grande, Puerto Prayers Rico, August 10-12, 2012; and the National Conference of the Council of State Governments, held in Austin, Texas, November 30 to December 3, 2012. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS *** Ï (1005) [Translation] [English] COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE PUBLIC SECTOR INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER The Speaker: I have the honour, pursuant to section 38 of the PROCEDURE AND HOUSE AFFAIRS Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act, to lay upon the table the Ms. Alexandrine Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent, NDP): special report of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner concern- Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, ing an investigation into a disclosure of wrongdoing. two reports from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House [Translation] Affairs. This report is deemed permanently referred to the Standing First I wish to present the 42nd report entitled, “Access to Committee on Government Operations and Estimates. Information Requests and Parliamentary Privilege”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government *** table a comprehensive response to the report. [English] [English] OFFICE OF THE CORRECTIONAL INVESTIGATOR Ms. -
Alberta’S Legislative Officers
Legislative Reports Standing Committee on Legislative Offices The Standing Committee on Legislative Offices met in December 2014 to review the budget estimates of Alberta’s Legislative Officers. The Committee approved these budgets at two per cent less than the previous year with two exceptions: the Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, which has a four-year budget cycle, and the Office of the Child and Youth Advocate (OCYA). In July 2014, the OCYA received additional funds following a legislated increase to its responsibilities. This pro-rated amount was added to the amount originally approved for the previous year before the two per cent reduction was applied. On February 10, 2015, the Committee met with representatives of the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) and the OCYA to consider requests for an increase to their approved budgets for the upcoming fiscal year. The OAG requested an additional $546,000 Alberta in order to ensure the Office would be able to fulfill its mandate and perform its work. The OCYA requested Continuation of the 3rd Session of the 28th Legislature an additional $275,000 to reflect the cost of fulfilling The 3rd Session of the 28th Legislature resumed on its expanded legislated mandate for a full 12 months. March 10, 2015. After months of floor crossings and The Committee approved the additional funds for the resignations the composition of the Assembly was at OAG, but the request from the OCYA was denied. 70 Progressive Conservatives, five Wildrose members, five Liberals, four New Democrats, one Independent The following day, Premier Prentice announced no and two vacancies. -
35 Executive Council
35 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ____________________________ 19 JANUARY 2010 EC2010-67 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ACT COMMITTEE OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL THE TREASURY BOARD APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to section 8 of the Executive Council Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. E-12 Council made/confirmed the following appointments effective 13 January 2010: as chairperson and member Honourable Wesley J. Sheridan as vice-chair and member Honourable Richard E. Brown as members Honourable Neil LeClair Honourable George Webster Valerie Docherty, M.L.A. Alan McIsaac, M.L.A. as an ex-officio member Honourable Robert W.J. Ghiz Order-in-Council EC2008-383 of 8 July 2008 is hereby rescinded. EC2010-68 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ACT COMMITTEES OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL TO ESTABLISH Under authority of subsection 9(1) of the Executive Council Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. E-12 Council established the following committees of the Executive Council, effective 13 January 2010: Operations Committee Policy Board The Legislative Review Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee are disestablished, effective 13 January 2010, and Orders-in-Council EC1998-8 of 8 January 1998, EC2008-384 of 8 July 2008, and EC2007-371 and EC2007-372 of 12 June 2007 are hereby rescinded. 36 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ____________________________ 19 JANUARY 2010 EC2010-69 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ACT COMMITTEE OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to subsection 9(2) of the Executive Council Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. E-12 Council made the following appointments to the Operations Committee, effective 13 January 2010: as chairperson and member Honourable Carolyn I. Bertram as vice-chairperson and member Honourable Robert Vessey as members Honourable Ron MacKinley Sonny J.