DOCSLIB.ORG

Anthropology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY B.A / B.Sc.(Honours) Anthropology CBCS: BA(Hons.),B.Sc.(Hons.) Core courses = 14 papers of 6 Credit each :100 marks each (5Units in each course) 400 Discipline Specific Elective (DSE) = 3 papers of 6 credit each: 100 marks each (5 Units in each course) And Project Report of 6 Credit: 100 Marks (Project 75 +Viva 25) 400 Generic Elective (GE) =4 papers of 6 credit each: 100 marks each (5 Units in each course) 400 Ability Enhancement Compulsory Course (AECC) =2 papers of 4 credit each 50marks each 100 (English Communication /MIL/Environmental Science) Skill Enhancement Courses (SEC) = 2 papers of 4 credit each =50 marks each 100 Sem I :2 Core Courses-1AECC IGE = 4 papers = 350 marks Sem II :2 Core Courses-1 AECC IGE = 4 papers = 350 marks Sem III :3 Core Courses -1SEC IGE = 5 papers = 450 marks Sem IV :3 Core Courses-1SEC IGE = 4 papers = 450 marks Sem V :2 Core Courses-2 DSE = 4 papers = 400 marks Sem VI :2 Core Courses -1 DSE Project Report = 4 papers = 400 marks Total =26 papers = 2400 marks(148 Credits) For Papers with Practical Component : Theory -70 (Mid seat 20-End Sem 50): Practical 30(End Sem I here will be no mid sem exam for Practical paper, For Papers with no Practical -100 marks paper =2- (Mid sem) -80 (End Sem :50 marks Paper =10 (Mid Sem + 40(End Sem) Subjects with Practical Each the 14 Core Course 4 Discipline specific elective courses .And 4 Generic Elective Papers will minimum theory classes (lectures ) of 1 hour duration and minimum 20 practical classes (normally classes to Hons level are of 2hours duration each) Subject without Practical Each of the 4 Core courses 4 Discipline specific elective courses and 4 Generic Elective papers (100 marks each will have minimum 50 theory classes (Lectures) of I hour duration and minimum 10 tutorial classes .Ability enhancement (compulsory) and 2 Ability enhancement (Skill based) papers will have minimum 20 classes (lectures) each of 1 hour duration, CBCS :B.A.(PASS.) Core courses = 12 papers AECC = 2 papers, SEC=4 papers,DSE= 4 papers ,GE=2 papers,24 Papers (2100 Marks -132 credits) 1 To complete this programme ,a student has to take 4 Core Courses each in 2 disciplines of choice and two core papers each in English and MIL respectively, CBCS : B.Sc (Pass) Core Courses -=12 papers AECC-=2 Papers ,SEC =4 Papers,DSE- 6 Papers:24 papers (2100 Marks- 132 credits) To complete this programme a student has to take 4 Core Papers each in 3 disciplines of choice, Core Courses: Semister-1 C1:Induction to C2: Induction to Socio Biological Anthropology cultural Anthropology Semister-2 C3:Archaeologial C4: Fundamentals Human Anthropology Origin & Evolution CORE PAPERS Credits Paper X ( Theory + Practical) = 14 X (4+2) =84 C1 :Introduction to Biological Anthropology Theory Credit -4 Unit 1: History and development Modern biological Anthropology.Aim Scope And its Relationship With Other Biological Sciences . Application Of Biological Anthropology In The Service Of Mankind . Unit-II: Origin Of Life And Evidence Of Organic Evolution . Theory Of Spontaneous Generation , Theory Of Extra Terestrial Origin Of Life , Theory Of Eternity , Theory Of Creationism , Theory Of Catastrophism Evidence Of Organic Evolution , Morphological , Embryological And Palaeantogical Evidences , Theory Of Organic Evolution , Lamarckism ,Neolamarckism,Darwinism,Modern synthetic Theory. Unit III: Mans Place in Animal Kingdom . The Order Primate Its Classification And Characterstics. Comparative anatomy and behaviors of human and non-human primates : Significance of non- human primate study in Biological Anthropology. Unit-IV: Structure and function of an animal cell; cell theory and cell division. Essentials of Genetics ,Landmarks in the history of genetics principle in human genetics Mendel’s Laws of inheritance and its application to man ;Concept of race & UNESCO statement on Race; A comparative account of various races of the world. Credit-2 1. Physiognomic facial height. 2. Morphological facial height. 3. Physiognomic upper facial height 4. Morphological Upper facial height 5. 13. Head circumference 6. Stature 7. Sitting height 8. Body weight 2 16. Facial form 4.Eye form Eye colour 8.Skin colour N R .I.(2012) Introduction to Physical Anthropology H Publishing Co.,New Delhi Exploring Biological Anthropology . The Essentials. Exposition of the Four Statements on Race (1972) Issued. Credit-4 C:2- Introduction to Socio-cultural Anthropology UNIT-I Anthropological Perspective and orientation, scope and relevance of social anthropology; Relationship & social Anthropology with other disciplines. UNIT –II Concept of society & culture ;Status & role . Social Organisation (Economic And political Organisation ) UNIT-III Social Institutions And Its Functions. (family , Marrige ,kinship,Descent) UNIT-IV Theory and Practice of Ethnographic fieldwork ; Survey method comparative & Historical method. CREDIT-2 Methods and Techniques of Social Anthropology : The Practical will include the following techniques and methods in collection of data in social Anthropology. (i) Observation ,(ii)Interview,(iii)Question aired and Schedule (iv) Case study (v) Life history. Suggested Readings:- 1. Beattie J.(1964) Other Cultures Londan : Cohen & West Limited. 2. Bernard H.P. (1940) .Research Methods in cultural Anthropology, Newbury Park. Sage Publication. 3. Davis K.(1981)Human Society New Delhi; Surjeet Publication. 4. Delaney C.(2004) Orientation and disorientation .In Investigating Culture; An experiential Introduction to Anthropology .Wiley –Blackwell. 5. Ember C.R. et al.(2011) .Anthropology New –Delhi :Dorling Kindersley 6. Farraro G. and Andereatta S (2008) .In Cultural Anthropology; An Applied Perspective Beimont;Wardsworth. 7. Haviland ,Prins,Waltatin McBride (2007) Introduction to Anthropology.Cengage Learning India Pvt.Ltd. New Delhi 8. Haviland ,Prins,Waltatin McBride (2008) Cultural Anthropology.Cengage Learning India Pvt.Ltd.New Delh. 3 9. Karen O’reilly.(2012). “Practical Issues in Interviewing Ethnographis Methods Abingdon ; Routledge. 10. Lang G/(1956) .Concept of status and Role in Anthropology; Their Definitions and Use. The American catholic Sociological Review.17(3) ;206-128 11. O’reilly K .(2012)Ethnographic Methods ;Abingdon Routledge. 12. Parsons T (1968) The Structure of Social Action .New York; Free Press. 13. Repport N. and Overing J (2004) Key Concepts in Social and Cultural Anthropology .London/Routledge, 14. Repport N. and Overing J (2004) Key Concepts in Social and Cultural Anthropology .London/Routledge, C3 : Archeological Anthropology Theory Credit -4 UNIT-1 : Introduction .Definition and scope of archaeological anthropology; Relation with othe disciplines Methods of studying archaeological anthropology. UNIT-II Methods of Estimation of Time and Reconstruction of the Past; Absolute dating methods: Radiocarbon 14 dating c14) ,Potassium-Argon, Fission Track Dating ;Relating dating methods. Stratigraphy. Paleontology ,Palynology. UNIT-III: Geochronology of Pleistocene Epoch; Glacial and Interglacial; Pluviation and Inter Pluviation; Different types of geoclimatic events. UNIT-IV; Understanding Culture ,Technique of tool manufacture and estimation of their relative efficiency; Classification of Tools; primary and combination fabrication techniques : Earliest evidence of culture in the world. Konso ,Olorgesailla, Olduva Gorge Pirro Nord,Damanisi ,Attirampakkam ,Isampur,Kuliana. Practical Credit -2 Typo –technological Analysis of Prehistoric Tools :Identification ,Interpretation and Drawings of the tool Type 1. Core Tool Types 2. Flake Tool Types 3. Blade Tool Types 4. Microlithic Tool Types 5. Neolithic Tool Types Suggested Readings:- 1. Allchin and Allchin(1993) The Rise of Civilization of India and Pakistan, Cambridge University Press 2. Bhattacharya D.K.(1978).Emergence of culture in Europe,Delhi,B.R. Publication. 3. BhattacharyaD.K.(1979).Old stone Age Tools and Technique ,Calcutta ,K.P. Bagchi Company. 4. Bhattacharya D.K.(19796) .Paleolithic Europe ,Netherlands Humanities Press. 5. Champion et al.(1984) Prehistoric,Europe New York Academic Press. 6. Fagan B.M(1993)People of Earth :An Introduction ,Boston,Little,Brown & Company. 7. Phillipson D.W (2005) African Archaeology,Cambridge ,Cambridge University Press. 8. Renfrew C and Paul Bahn(1996)Archaeology :Theories Methods and Practice , Thames and Hudson. 4 9. Sankalia H.D.(1964) Stone Age Tools Poona Deccan College. C4: Fundamental of Human & Evolution Theory Credit -4 UNIT-1 : Primate origins and radiation with special reference to Miocene hominoids Ramapithecus , distribution ,features and their phylogenetic relationship. UNIT-II : Australopithecines; distribution ,features and their phylogenetic relationships. Appearance of genus Home(Homo habilis) and related finds .Homo erectus from Asia, Europe and Africa : Distribution ,features and their phylogeniticstatus. UNIT-III: The Origin of Homo sapiens :Fossil evidences of Neaderthals and Archaic Homo sapienssapiens. UNIT-IV; Origin of modern humans (Home sapiens sapiens): distribution and feature; Multi religional and Out of Africa theory : Hominisation process. Practical (any two) Credit -2 Cranimetry: Maximum cranial length Maximun cranial breadth Maximum bizygomatic breadth Maximun Frontal breadth Manimum Frontal breadth Nasal height Nasal height Bi-mastoid breadth Greatest occipital breadth Upper facial height Cranial index Nasal index Osteomentry: Measurements of long bones:lengths,minimum /least circumference and caliber index. Identification of casts of fossils of family homenidae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Living Culture Embodied: Constructing Meaning in the Contra Dance Community
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2011 Living Culture Embodied: Constructing Meaning in the Contra Dance Community Kathryn E. Young University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Dance Commons Recommended Citation Young, Kathryn E., "Living Culture Embodied: Constructing Meaning in the Contra Dance Community" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 726. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/726 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. LIVING CULTURE EMBODIED: CONSTRUCTING MEANING IN THE CONTRA DANCE COMMUNITY __________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Social Sciences University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Kathryn E. Young August 2011 Advisor: Dr. Christina F. Kreps ©Copyright by Kathryn E. Young 2011 All Rights Reserved Author: Kathryn E. Young Title: LIVING CULTURE EMBODIED: CONSTRUCTING MEANING IN THE CONTRA DANCE COMMUNITY Advisor: Dr. Christina F. Kreps Degree Date: August 2011 Abstract In light of both the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and the efforts of the Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage in producing the Smithsonian Folklife Festival, it has become clear that work with intangible cultural heritage in museums necessitates staff to carry out ethnographic fieldwork among heritage communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Perspectives on Art, Relationality, and Creativity
    Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia Vol. 5, No 1 | 2016 Micro-utopias: anthropological perspectives on art, relationality, and creativity Micro-utopias: anthropological perspectives on art, relationality, and creativity. Ruy Blanes, Alex Flynn, Maïté Maskens and Jonas Tinius Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/cadernosaa/1017 DOI: 10.4000/cadernosaa.1017 ISSN: 2238-0361 Publisher Núcleo de Antropologia Visual da Bahia Printed version Number of pages: 5-20 Electronic reference Ruy Blanes, Alex Flynn, Maïté Maskens and Jonas Tinius, « Micro-utopias: anthropological perspectives on art, relationality, and creativity. », Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia [Online], Vol. 5, No 1 | 2016, Online since 01 April 2016, connection on 10 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/cadernosaa/1017 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/cadernosaa.1017 © Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia MICRO-UTOPIAS: ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ART, RELATIONALITY, AND CADERNOSCREATIVITY. AA Ruy Blanes, Alex Flynn, Maïté Maskens, Jonas Tinius1 RATIONALE AND CONTEXT he editors began discussing this special issue in 2014 through a serendipitous encounter. Ruy and Maïté were interested in the possibility of promoting an anthropology of utopia, and simultaneously an anthropology as utopia. Alex and Jonas, working on anthropological ap- proaches to contemporary artistic practices, were seeking to develop the theorising potential of relational art. he immanent space of connection was, precisely, the concept of “micro-utopia”. In our discussions, several questions, problems, and challenges emerged about the relevance of micro-utopias for an anthropology of art in particular, but also for an anthropological agenda concerned with core themes of the disciplines, among them agency, creativity, and relationality. As editors based in three diferent continents, we have selected a range of texts that are situated in starkly diferent ields.
    [Show full text]
  • M.Sc. in Anthropology Syllabus
    Syllabus for M. Sc. in Anthropology Department of Anthropology Central University of Orissa Koraput 0 M.Sc. in ANTHROPOLOGY Semester-I: Course Course Code Title Credits Full Mark No. 1 ANT – C 311 Biological Anthropology -I 4 100 2 ANT – C 312 Socio-Cultural Anthropology 4 100 3 ANT – C 313 Archaeological Anthropology 4 100 & Museology 4 ANT – C 314 Research Methods 4 100 5 ANT – C 315 Tribes in India 2 100 6 ANT – C 316 General Practical – I 2 100 Semester-II: Course Course Code Title Credits Full Mark No. 7 ANT – C 321 Biological Anthropology -II 4 100 8 ANT – C 322 Theories of Society and 4 100 Culture 9 ANT – C 323 Pre- and Proto- History of 4 100 India, Africa and Europe 10 ANT – C 324 Indian Anthropology 4 100 11 ANT – C 325 Peasants in India 2 100 12 ANT – C 326 General Practical – II 2 100 1 Semester-III: (GROUP – A: Physical / Biological Anthropology) Course Course Code Title Credits Full No. Mark 13 ANT – C 331 Anthropological Demography 4 100 14 ANT – C 332 Field Work Training 2 100 15 ANT – C 333 Human Ecology: Biological & Cultural 2 100 dimensions 16 ANT – C 334 ‘A’ Medical Genetics 4 100 17 ANT – C 335 ‘A’ Practical in Biological Anthropology - I 4 100 18 ANT – E1 336 ‘A’ Growth and Nutrition, OR 4 100 ANT – E2 336 ‘A’ Forensic Anthropology – I, OR ANT – E3 336 ‘A’ Environmental Anthropology Students can choose one Extra Electives offered by Department and one Allied Electives from other Subjects in 3rd Semester Semester-III: (GROUP – B: Socio - Cultural Anthropology) Course Course Code Title Credits Full Mark No.
    [Show full text]
  • Courses for Anthropology 1
    Courses for Anthropology 1 COURSES FOR ANTHROPOLOGY ANT208 Anthropology of Sex Anthropology Courses Hours 3 ANT100 Anthropology: The Study of Humanity SB This course is an introduction to human sexuality from a biocultural perspective with emphases on sexual diversity and pluralism and Hours 3 psychosexual evolution. It traces the evolution of human sociosexual This course introduces students to the subfields of anthropology and behavior, including human sexual physiology, preproductive strategies; demonstrates the benefits of a holistic approach to understanding contemporary courtship, mating and marital patterns; gender differences globalization, multiculturalism, and cultural diversity. The concepts of in the brain and behavior; and sexual and social emotions. It compares evolution, human prehistory, language, and culture are explored as well as the sexuality of humans to non-humans, especially to that of other the diversity of human cultural patterns, including variations in marriage, primates. It also discusses human sexuality from the perspective of kinship, and religion. different cultures throughout the world. Among other topics, the course will address the psychobiocultural dimensions and implications of Social and Behavioral Sciences attraction, fidelity sex techniques, gender, incest, homosexuality and ANT102 Intro to Cultural Anthropology transexuality and sexually transmitted diseases. SB ANT210 Language and Culture Hours 3 SB An introduction to the discipline of cultural anthropology, the branch of Hours 3 anthropology that examines the rules and behaviors of contemporary Human activity in its linguistic, cultural, and social contexts; human cultures. The course will demonstrate the importance of a holistic interrelationships between culture and natural language; and the approach to understanding human diversity, and compare and contrast influences of language and culture on thought and behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • A Provocative Approach to the 'Anthropology of Art', with Reference
    The Japanese Society for Aesthetics Aesthetics No.19 (2015): 1-11 A Provocative Approach to the ‘Anthropology of Art’, with reference to C. S. Peirce KATO Takafumi Kyoto University, Kyoto Introduction Alfred Gell, a British anthropologist who passed away in 1997, proposes the theory of the ‘anthropology of art’ in his posthumously published book Art and Agency[1] (hereinafter AA), and he refers to Charles S. Peirce’s concepts such as index and abduction in explaining his ‘anthropology of art’. This paper will consider both Gell’s theory and Peirce’s thought, and argue that although Gell’s understanding of Peirce’s thought does not necessarily seem appropriate, Gell’s ‘anthropology of art’ suggests thought-provoking views about agencies regarding artistic activities. Furthermore, this paper will suggest a contemporary applicability of Peirce’s thought, which is independent of Gell’s theory. The first section describes the outline of Gell’s ‘anthropology of art’. In the second section, his concepts of ‘agency’ and ‘index’ are examined, and then, these concepts are applied to a couple of example cases. The third section focuses on Gell’s concept of the ‘extended mind’. The fourth section speculates on the potential impact of the ‘extended mind’ and examines Peirce’s concept of index. As a conclusion to this paper, a blueprint that can be developed from both Peirce’s semiotics and Gell’s ‘anthropology of art’ will be suggested. 1. Anthropology of Art In AA, Gell comprehensively argues his theory of ‘anthropology of art’. According to this theory, the ‘anthropology of art’ examines “the social context of art production, circulation, and reception” (AA, p.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Art History and Cultural Difference: Alfred Gell's Anthropology Of
    Published in: Art History Vol. 28 No. 4 (Autumn 2005) pp. 524-51. Art History and Cultural Difference: Alfred Gell’s Anthropology of Art Matthew Rampley One of the most pressing issues currently confronting the theory and history of art is the question of cultural difference. Specifically, what are the implications of the difference between western and non-Western cultures for the task of visual and artistic analysis? In what ways is it possible to undertake cross-cultural analysis while remaining within the frame of art history – a set of discourses originally formulated to account for the development of Western art? The responses to this question have been varied, ranging from an emphasis on the complete incommensurability of different cultures to ambitious attempts at constructing world art histories. In this article I examine the work of one particular author – the anthropologist Alfred Gell (1945-1997) – and his contribution to discussion on this issue. As I argue, Gell offers some potentially significant ways of rethinking this question, and specifically, his work offers the outline of a possible form of cross-cultural analysis that avoids some of the pitfalls that have beset previous such attempts. I analyse Gell in detail shortly, but before doing so, offer a brief overview of the current state of critical debate on the issue. Questions of Cultural Difference 1 Published in: Art History Vol. 28 No. 4 (Autumn 2005) pp. 524-51. At the root of the topic of cultural difference are a number of inter-related questions. In particular:
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology of Art 070:153 (1.5 Credits) Spring 2017 – **Starts 3/9** Thursday 2:15Pm – 5:15Pm RAB 104
    Anthropology of Art 070:153 (1.5 credits) Spring 2017 – **Starts 3/9** Thursday 2:15pm – 5:15pm RAB 104 Pilar K. Rau – [email protected] Office: RAB 3rd Floor Office hours: Mon, Thurs 2:00-3:00pm or by appointment COURSE DESCRIPTION Do all societies have “art”? Why is the visual and expressive culture of some groups characterized as artifact, craft, primitive art, ethnic art, kitsch, or commodity? What is at stake in applying the word “art” to a people for whom such a concept is foreign? Or in excluding an object from the category of “art”? This introduction to the Anthropology of Art looks at anthropological issues of cultural relativism, emic/etic description, ethnocentrism, symbolism, ritual, and the politics of representing “Other” people, through the lens of “art” and it considers the visual and material culture of diverse societies (including Western fine art) through anthropological frameworks. It tackles the historical legacies of Primitivism and teleological thinking as well as how the categories of “art” and “culture” are currently deployed to objectify group identity in service of nationalisms, local culturalisms, and social movements. http://anthro.rutgers.edu/undergrad-program/department-learning-goals DEPARTMENT LEARNING GOALS CA1) Students gain knowledge that will allow them to identify, explain, and historically contextualize the primary objectives, fundamental concepts, modes of analysis, and central questions in their major field and demonstrate proficiency in their use of this knowledge CA2) Students are
    [Show full text]
  • BIOARTS in SCIENCE-CITYSCAPES ETHNOGRAPHIC FRAGMENTS of the NEUROWORLD BIRGIT RUTH BUERGI (M.Phil, Cantab) a THESIS SUBMITTED FO
    BIOARTS IN SCIENCE-CITYSCAPES ETHNOGRAPHIC FRAGMENTS OF THE NEUROWORLD BIRGIT RUTH BUERGI (M.Phil, Cantab) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPY IN ANTHROPOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2017 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. ____________________________ Birgit Ruth Buergi First submitted on 13 May 2016 Revised and resubmitted on 2 May 2017 2 In memoriam Zaha Hadid 1950-2016 3 Acknowledgements In January 2012, I joined the Asian Biopoleis: Biotechnology & Biomedicine as Emergent Forms of Life & Practice grant programme as an Asia Research Institute (ARI) Research Scholar. I wish to thank the former director of ARI, Professor Dr Prasenjit Duara, for welcoming me into the community. Funding for the full PhD Scholarship has been provided by The Ministry of Education, Singapore, and the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) Division of the Office of the Deputy President (Research and Technology) at the National University of Singapore (NUS), Grant Number MOE2009-T2-2-01. The FASS Research Staff Support Scheme funded the two reconnaissance trips of 2012 and 2013, and the FASS Graduate Research Support Scheme has provided funding for a year of fieldwork in Thailand. Travel grants from the Overseas Educational Programmes (OEP), and the Financial Assistance for Conferences for FASS Graduate Research Students scheme, allowed me to participate in overseas symposia, seminars, and workshops in England (Cambridge, Canterbury, London, and Oxford) and Canada (Toronto and Vancouver).
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthropologist As Curator
    The Anthropologist as Curator Edited by Roger Sansi The Anthropologist as Curator.indb 3 20-09-2019 16:19:24 Contents List of figures vi List of contributors viii 1 Introduction: anthropology and curation through the looking glass Roger Sansi 1 2 Curatorial designs: Act II Tarek Elhaik and George Marcus 17 3 The recursivity of the curatorial Jonas Tinius and Sharon Macdonald 35 4 Whose stories about Africa? Reflexivity and public dialogue at the Royal Ontario Museum Silvia Forni 59 5 Facing the ‘curatorial turn’: anthropological ethnography, exhibitions and collecting practices Ivan Bargna 73 6 Ethnographic Terminalia: co-curation and the role of the anecdote in practice Stephanie Takaragawa, Trudi Lynn Smith, Fiona P. McDonald, Kate Hennessy and Craig Campbell 97 7 Coming together differently: art, anthropology and the curatorial space Judith Winter 115 8 From Of, to With, to And? Anti-disciplinary exhibition making with art and anthropology Jen Clarke 133 9 Curating the intermural: graffiti in the museum 2008–18 Rafael Schacter 147 10 The curator, the anthropologist: ‘presentialism’ and open-ended enquiry in process Alex Flynn 173 11 Between automation and agency: curatorial challenges in new terrains of digital/visual research Eva Theunissen and Paolo S. H. Favero 195 12 Anthropological sound curation: from listening to curating Noel Lobley 211 Index 227 The Anthropologist as Curator.indb 5 20-09-2019 16:19:25 Contributors Ivan Bargna is Associate Professor of Aesthetic Anthropology, and Media Anthropology at University of Milan Bicocca, and Visiting Professor of Cultural Anthropology at Milan Bocconi University. He is director of the post-degree programme of specialization in Anthropology of Art and Heritage at University of Milan Bicocca.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Anthropology Complete Handout.Pdf
    visual anthropology handout Dr Àngels Trias i Valls 05 Department of Anthropology Visual Anthropology Handout Dr Ma. Àngels Trias i Valls University of Wales Lampeter Room GO46 Arts Hall – contact: [email protected] – visiting hours: Tues&Thurs at 4.00pm Index 1. Module page with course description 2 2. Objectives 3 3. Bibliography 5 4. Internet 10 5. Intranet 11 6. Course Itinerary 12 7. Assessment 14 8. Lecture and Tutorial Handouts 15 8.1 Lectures 1 to 12 15 8.2 Tutorials 1 to 8 46 9. Revision and Exam Techniques 66 1 visual anthropology handout TiV04 0 Module Description The module is concerned how different cultures are depicted in a range of media, in particular ethnographic film and photography, and deals with the analytical and ethical issues raised by these representations. It considers how the analysis of art and material culture can be used by the anthropologists to gain insight into cultural forms and values. It also examines how different cultural groups represents themselves, to each other and to outsiders through art, material culture and performance. Course code: 1ANTH0420 Course Lecturer: Dr. Ma Àngels Trias i Valls Lent Term 2004 20 Credits 2 visual anthropology handout TiV04 1 Object of the Course In this course we will study the place of the ‘visual’ and visual systems from a cross- cultural point of view. We will examine how anthropology can contribute to –and gain insight from- the analysis of visual forms of representations. We will explore how images, forms or art, maps, pictures, ethnographic film, the body, gender, adornments to name a few, are constructed in societies across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnographic Turn – and After
    The ethnographic turn – and after: a critical approach towards the realignment of art and anthropology Anna Grimshaw, Graduate Institute of Liberal Arts, Emory University Amanda Ravetz, Manchester School of Art, Manchester Metropolitan University Abstract The ethnographic turn has been the focus of recent debate between artists and anthropologists. Crucial to it has been an expansive notion of the ethnographic. No longer considered a specialized technique, the essays of Clifford and others have proposed a broader and more eclectic interpretation of ethnography - an approach long considered to be the exclusive preserve of academic anthropology. In this essay, we look more critically at what the ethnographic turn has meant for artists and anthropologists. To what extent does it describe a convergence of perspectives? Or does it elide significant differences in practice? Key words: ethnography, art, anthropology, ethics, aesthetics The last fifteen years has seen a proliferation of international conferences, workshops, exhibitions, publications and projects about art and anthropology (Ravetz 2007; Rutten, et al 2013; Sansi 2015). What was long an uneasy relationship – and sometimes no relationship at all – has become a focus of renewed interest and debate.1 Much of the recent debate was framed -- at least initially -- by what leading commentators called the ethnographic turn (Clifford 1988, Foster 1995). Subsequently, however, a number of different terms have come into play. Specifically, practices of making (Ingold 2013) and ethnographic conceptualism (Ssorin Chaikov 2013) have been proposed as alternative ways of thinking about convergences between art and anthropology. In this essay, we look more closely and critically at attempts to realign fields of practice.
    [Show full text]
  • (575) 621-5999 Email: [email protected]
    CHRISTINE E. EBER 1825 Myrtle Ave. Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001, U.S.A. cell phone: (575) 621-5999 email: [email protected] EDUCATION___________________________________________________________ Ph.D. 1991 (with distinction) Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY Dissertation: "Before God's Flowering Face: Women and Drinking in a Tzotzil-Maya Community." M.A. 1983 Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY. Thesis: "Continuity and Change in a Spiritualist Community" B.A. 1969 Divisional Social Sciences – Anthropology, Sociology & Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT_______________________________________________ Professor Emerita, Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico. January 2011 to present. Professor, Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico. August 2009 – 2010. Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico. August 2004 - 2009. Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico. August 1995 – July 2004. Assistant Professor, Anthropology Department, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT. August 1992 – May 1995. Visiting lecturer, Anthropology Department, State University of New York at Albany. Fall 1991. OTHER TEACHING AFFILIATIONS________________________________________ Adjunct faculty member, Anthropology Department, University of San Carlos, Cebu Island, Philippines. 2002 to 2010. Instructor, Buffalo Museum of Science Education Department. Spring 1991. 1 HONORS & AWARDS___________________________________________________ 2011 Honorable Mention for poem, “Do you want me to cut more vegetables, Boss?”, Society for Humanistic Anthropology 2011 Poetry Competition. 2010 Donald C. Rousch Excellence in Teaching Award, New Mexico State University. 2009 Arts & Sciences Faculty Outstanding Achievement Award, New Mexico State University.
    [Show full text]