DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphic and Hydrogeologic Framework of the Alabama Coastal Plain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphic and Hydrogeologic Framework of the Alabama Coastal Plain WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 87-4112 STRATIGRAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE ALABAMA COASTAL PLAIN By Marvin E. Davis Precambrian to Paleozoic Metamorphic and Igneous Rocks LpperEocene to Holocene.undifferentiated ft UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR " GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Regional Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 75 Spring Street, S.W., Suite 772 Books and Open-File Reports Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Box 25425, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................. 1 Purpose and scope ................................................... 3 Previous investigations ............................................. 3 Acknowledgments ..................................................... 4 Method of study ..................................................... 4 Physiographic features ............................................... 6 Coastal Plain Province ......................................... 8 East Gulf Coastal Plain section ........................... 8 Fall Line Hills ....................................... 8 Black Prairie Belt ................................... 8 Chunnennuggee Hi 11s .................................. 8 Southern Red Hills ................................... 9 Lime Hills ........................................... 9 Southern Pine Hills .................................. 9 Geology .................................................................. 10 Regional setting .................................................... 10 Structural features in the Coastal Plain ............................ 12 Stratigraphy ............................................................. 14 Pre-Cretaceous System ............................................... 14 Cretaceous System ................................................... 15 Lower Cretaceous Series ........................................ 15 Upper Cretaceous Series ........................................ 15 Tuscaloosa Group .......................................... 15 Coker Formation ...................................... 16 Gordo Formation ...................................... 16 ^ Eutaw Formation............................................. 16 Selma Group ............................................... 17 Mooreville Chalk and Blufftown Formation ............. 17 Demopolis Chalk ...................................... 18 Ripley Formation ..................................... 18 Prairie Bluff Chalk and Providence Sand .............. 18 Tertiary System ..................................................... 18 Paleocene Series ............................................... 18 Midway Group .............................................. 18 Clayton Formation .................................... 19 Porters Creek Formation .............................. 19 Naheola Formation .................................... 19 Wiicox Group .............................................. 20 Nanafalia Formation and Baker Hill Formation ......... 20 Tuscahoma Formation .................................. 21 Eocene Series .................................................. 21 Wiicox Group .............................................. 21 Hatchetigbee Formation and Bashi Formation ........... 21 Claiborne Group ........................................... 21 Tallahatta Formation ................................. 21 Lisbon Formation ..................................... 21 Gosport Sand ......................................... 22 Jackson Group ............................................. 22 iii CONTENTS Continued Page Moodys Branch Formation .............................. 22 Yazoo Clay and Ocala Limestone ....................... 22 Oligocene Series ............................................... 23 Red Bluff Formation and Bumpnose Formation ................ 23 Vicksburg Group ........................................... 23 Mint Springs Formation and Marianna Formation ........ 23 Glendon Formation .................................... 23 Bryam Formation ...................................... 23 Bucatunna Formation .................................. 23 Chickasawhay Formation .................................... 23 Paynes Hammock Formation .................................. 24 Miocene Series ................................................. 24 Pliocene Series ................................................ 24 Citronelle Formation ...................................... 24 Quaternary System ................................................... 24 Pleistocene and Holocene Series ................................ 24 Relation of geologic units to aquifers and confining units ............... 24 Tuscaloosa aquifer .................................................. 25 Eutaw aquifer ....................................................... 26 Providence-Ripley aquifer ........................................... 27 Nanafalia-Clayton aquifer ........................................... 27 Lisbon aquifer ...................................................... 28 Floridan and Gulf Coastal Lowlands aquifer systems .................. 28 Summary .................................................................. 29 Selected references ...................................................... 31 iv ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Alabama Coastal Plain study area, Southeastern Coastal Plain Regional Aquifer System Analysis study area, and parts of adjacent Regional Aquifer System Analysis study areas ........ 2 2. Interpretation of representative electric logs of oil-test wells showing correlation of formation tops and changes in lithology between eastern and western Alabama ................ 5 3. Physiographic provinces of Alabama ............................. 7 4. Diagrammatic geologic section showing stratigraphic relations of Upper Cretaceous formations in Alabama .................... 10 5. Correlation chart of outcropping stratigraphic units of Late Cretaceous age in the upper part of the Coastal Plain in Alabama ............................................. 11 6. Location of prominent salt-related structural features in the Alabama Coastal Plain .................................... 13 TABLE Table 1. Well data for stratigraphic sections in the Coastal Plain of Alabama .................................................... 35 PLATES (Plates are in pocket) Plate 1. Map showing location of key wells and stratigraphic sections in the Coastal Plain of Alabama 2. Stratigraphic section A-A^ 3. Stratigraphic section B-B' 4. Stratigraphic section C-c" 5. Stratigraphic section D-D' 6. Stratigraphic section E-E^ Plate 7-15. Maps showing: 7. The configuration of base of the Cretaceous System 8. The configuration of top of the Lower Cretaceous rocks undif f erentiated ILLUSTRATIONS continued Plates 7-15. Maps showing: continued 9. The configuration of top of the Coker Formation 10. The configuration of top of the Gordo Formation 11. The configuration of top of the Eutaw Formation 12. The configuration of top of the Selma Group 13. The configuration of top of the Midway Group 14. The configuration of top of the Wilcox Group 15. The configuration of top of the Claiborne Group 16. Generalized correlation chart showing stratigraphic and hydrogeologic units in the Coastal Plain of Alabama 17. Generalized outcrop of the Selma Group in the northeastern part of the Coastal Plain in Alabama and lines of measured geologic profiles. A, Map showing outcrop of the Selma Group and lines of measured geologic profiles (A-A^, B-B', and C-C^). B, Lithologic columns from measured profiles showing correlation and facies changes in the outcropping formations of the Selma Group vi STRATIGRAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE ALABAMA COASTAL PLAIN By Marvin E. Davis ABSTRACT Tertiary and Cretaceous sand aquifers of the Southeastern United States Coastal Plain comprise a major multistate aquifer system informally defined as the Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system, which is being studied as part of the U.S. Geological Survey's Regional Aquifer System Analysis (RASA) program. The major objectives of each RASA study are to identify, delineate, and map the distribution of permeable clastic rock, to examine the pattern of ground-water flow within the regional aquifers, and to develop digital computer simulations to understand the flow system. The Coastal Plain aquifers in Alabama are being studied as a part of this system. This report describes the stratigraphic framework of the Cretaceous, Tertiary, and Quaternary Systems in Alabama to aid in delineating aquifers and confining units within the thick sequence of sediments that comprises the Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system in the State. Stratigraphic units of Cretaceous and Tertiary age that make up most of the aquifer system in the Coastal Plain of Alabama consist of clastic deposits of Early Cretaceous age; the Coker and Gordo Formations of the Tuscaloosa Group, Eutaw Formation, and Selma Group of Late Cretaceous age; and the Midway, Wilcox, and Claiborne Groups of Tertiary age. However, stratigraphic units of late Eocene to Holocene age partially overlie and are hydraulically connected to clastic deposits in southern Alabama. These upper carbonate and clastic stratigraphic units also are part of the adjoining Floridan and Gulf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States Part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin
    Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources —Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States Part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin By Paul C. Hackley U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Hackley, P.C., 2012, Geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources—Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Open–File Report 2012–1144, 87 p., available only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1144/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments
    [Show full text]
  • Cleburne County Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Cleburne County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Plan Update 2 This page left intentionally blank 3 Prepared under the direction of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, the Local Emergency Planning Committee, and the Cleburne County Emergency Management Agency by: 236 Town Mart Clanton, AL 35045 Office (205) 280-3027, Fax (205) 280-0543 www.leehelmsllc.com 4 This page left intentionally blank 5 Cleburne County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Introduction 11 Section One Planning Process 13 Plan Update Process 13 Continued Public Participation 13 Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee 14 Participation Guidelines 15 Committee and Public Meeting Schedule and Participation 16 Interagency and Intergovernmental Coordination 26 Integration with Existing Plans 27 Plan Adoption 27 Section Two General Characteristics 31 Growth Trends 32 General Geology 34 Section Three Cleburne County Risk Assessment 39 Hazard Profiles 54 I. Thunderstorms 54 II. Lightning 55 III. Hail 58 IV. Tornados 60 V. Floods/Flash Floods 66 VI. Droughts/Extreme Heat 72 VII. Winter Storms/Frost Freezes/Heavy Snow/Ice Storms/ Winter Weather/Extreme Cold 78 VIII. Hurricanes/Tropical Storms/Tropical Depressions/High Winds/ Strong Winds 80 IX. Sinkholes/Expansive Soils 85 X. Landslides 88 XI. Earthquake 90 6 XII. Wildfire 99 XIII. Dam Failure 101 Section Four Vulnerability Assessment 105 Socially Vulnerable Populations 112 Vulnerable Structures 116 Critical Facility Inventory 118 Development Trends 120 Methods of Warning 120 Vulnerability Summary 124 Estimated Loss Projections
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial to Charles Wythe Cooke 1887— 1971 VICTOR T
    Memorial to Charles Wythe Cooke 1887— 1971 VICTOR T. STRINGFIELD 4208 50 Street, NW„ Washington, D.C. 20016 The death of Dr. Charles Wythe Cooke in Daytona Beach, Florida, on Christmas Day 1971, ended his long and successful career as geologist, stratigrapher, and paleontologist. He is survived by his sister, Madge Lane Cooke. Cooke was born in Baltimore, Maryland, July 20, 1887. He was a bachelor. He received the degree of Bachelor of Arts from Johns Hopkins University in 1908 and Ph.D. (in geology) in 1912. From 1911 to 1912 he was a Fellow at the university. In July 1910, while a grad­ uate student, he received an appointment as Junior Geologist for summer work in the U.S. Geological Survey, beginning his long career in that organization. In the U.S. Geological Survey, he was Assistant Geologist, 1913 to 1917; Paleontologist, 1917 to 1919; Associate Geologist, 1919 to 1920; Geologist, 1920 to 1928; Scientist, 1928 to 1941; Senior Scientist, 1941 to 1951; andGeologist-Stratigrapher-Paleontologist, 1952 to 1956. He served as research associate in the Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C., from 1956 until his death. He was geologist in the Dominican Republic for the Geological Survey in 1919 and worked for the Tropical Oil Company, Colombia, South America, in 1920. After completing his 40 years of service in the U.S. Geological Survey, Cooke retired on November 30,1956. Also in 1956 he received the Meritorious Service Award of the Interior Department in recognition of his outstanding service. That citation in 1956 states: His scientific work lias been concerned with the paleontology, stratigraphy, and landforms (geomorphology) of the Coastal Plain, extending from New Jersey to Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • B-127 Lithostratigraphic Framework Of
    &A 'NlOO,G-3 &i flo, 12 7 g l F£i&f THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF \;\ .-t "- THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour Work Performed in Cooperation with United States Geological Survey (Cooperative Agreement Number 1434-92-A-0959) and U. S. Department of Energy (Cooperative Agreement Number DE-FG-09-92SR12868) GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lonice C. Barrett, Commissioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Harold F. Reheis, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 ABSTRACT One new formation, two new members, and a redefinition of an established lithostratigraphic unit are formally introduced here. The Oconee Group is formally recognized in the Savannah River area and four South Carolina Formations not previously used in Georgia by the Georgia Geologic Survey are recognized in eastern Burke County. The Still Branch Sand is a new formation and the two new members are the Bennock Millpond Sand Member of the Still Branch Sand and the Blue Bluff Member of the Lisbon Formation. The four South Carolina formations recognized in eastern Burke CountY include the Steel Creek Formation and Snapp Formation of the Oconee Group, the Black Mingo Formation (undifferentiated), and the Congaree Formation. The Congaree Formation and Still Branch Sand are considered to be lithostratigraphic components of the Claiborne Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan: Phase One
    DRAFT East Alabama Regional Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan: Phase One A HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FOR AEMA DIVISION D COUNTIES: LEE COUNTY AND RUSSELL COUNTY AND ELIGIBLE LOCAL JURISDICTIONS 1 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Hazard Mitigation Plan Introduction 1.1 Plan Scope 1.2 Authority 1.3 Funding 1.4 Purpose Section 2 Lee – Russell Regional Profile 2.1 Background 2.2 Demographics 2.3 Business and Industry 2.4 Infrastructure 2.5 Land Use and Development Trends Section 3 Planning Process 3.1 Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption 3.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation 3.3 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process 3.4 Public and Other Stakeholder Involvement 3.5 Integration with Existing Plans Section 4 Risk Assessment 4.1 Hazard Overview 4.2 Hazard Profiles 4.3 Technological and Human-Caused Hazards 4.4 Vulnerability Overview 4.5 Probability of Future Occurrence and Loss Estimation 4.6 Total Population and Property Value Summary by Jurisdiction 4.7 Critical Facilities/Infrastructure by Jurisdiction 4.8 Hazard Impacts 4.9 Vulnerable Populations in Lee-Russell Planning Area Section 5 Mitigation 5.1 Mitigation Planning Process 5.2 Regional Mitigation Goals 5.3 Regional Mitigation Strategies 5.4 Capabilities Assessment for Local Jurisdictions 5.5 Jurisdictional Mitigation Action Plans 5.5.1 Lee County Jurisdictions Actions 5.5.2 Russell County Jurisdictions Actions Section 6 Plan Maintenance Process 2 DRAFT 6.1 Hazard Mitigation Monitoring, Evaluation, and Update Process 6.2 Hazard Mitigation Plan Incorporation 6.3 Public Awareness/Participation Section 7 Appendix 7.1 Appendix A: Community Survey 7.2 Appendix B: Agendas 7.3 Appendix C: Briefs, Advertisements, and Sign-in Sheets 7.4 Appendix D: Hazard Events Tables 3 DRAFT Section 1 - Hazard Mitigation Plan Introduction Section Contents 1.1 Plan Scope 1.2 Authority 1.3 Funding 1.4 Purpose 4 DRAFT 1.1 Plan Scope The East Alabama Regional Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is a plan that details the multitude of hazards that affect the Alabama Emergency Management Agency (AEMA) Division D area.
    [Show full text]
  • Permophiles Issue #58 November 2013 EXECUTIVE NOTES Notes from the SPS Secretary Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, May 20-22, 2013
    Table of Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary 1 Lucia Angiolini Notes from the SPS Chair 2 Shuzhong Shen Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy Annual Report 2013 3 Shuzhong Shen, SPS Chairman Officers and Voting Members since August, 2012 5 The Reality of GSSPs 6 Stanley C. Finney GSSPs (Global Stratotype Section and Point) and Correlation 8 Stanley C. Finney We Need a New GSSP for the Base of the Permian 8 Spencer G. Lucas The GSSP at the Aidaralash section is solid and has no alternative 13 Vladimir I. Davydov The Aidaralash GSSP—Reply to Davydov 15 Spencer G. Lucas Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Sakmarian Stage (Lower Permian) 16 Valery V. Chernykh, Boris I. Chuvashov, Shuzhong Shen andCharles M. Henderson Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Artinskian Stage (Lower Permian) 26 Boris I. Chuvashov, Valery V. Chernykh, Shuzhong Shen and Charles M. Henderson Report of the Chinese, Iranian, Italian working group: The Permian-Triassic boundary sections of Julfa and Zal revisited 34 Lucia Angiolini, Shuzhong Shen, Maryamnaz Bahrammanesh, Syrus Abbasi, Mina Birjandi, Gaia Crippa, Dongxun Yuan and Claudio Garbelli Age assignment of section 4 of Teichert et al. (1973) at Ali Bashi Mountains (Julfa, NW Iran) 36 Abbas Ghaderi, Ali Reza Ashouri, Heinz W. Kozur and Dieter Korn Report of field excursions 2012/2013 of the “Sino-German Cooperation Group on the Late Palaeozoic Palaeobiology, Stratigraphy and Geochemistry” between Europe and China 40 Jun Wang, Shuzhong Shen, Joerg W. Schneider and Hans Kerp ANNOUNCEMENTS 42 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR ISSUE 59 44 Photo 1: The Permian-Triassic succession of the Ali Bashi Mountains, Julfa, NW Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,E @F T the Claibornian Stage
    The Eocene TaJJahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,e @f t The Claibornian Stage U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1615 The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Age of The Claibornian Stage By laurel M. Bybell and Thomas G. Gibson U.S. GEOlOGICAl SURVEY BUllETIN 1615 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1985 For sale by the Distribution Branch, Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett St. Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bybell, Laurel M. The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia. <U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1615) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1615 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Eocene. 2. Geology--Alabama. 3. Geology-­ Georgia. I. Gibson, Thomas G. II. Title. III. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1615 557.3 s [551.7'84] 84-600098 [QE692.2] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 1 Acknowledgments 2 Lithostratigraphy 2 Biostratigraphy 7 Paleoenvironmental analysis 15 The Tallahatta and the age of the Claibornian Stage 17 Conclusions 18 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates follow references cited] 1. Discoaster, Tribrachiatus, Helicosphaera, Rhabdosphaera, Transversopontis, Cyclococcolithus, and Reticulofenestra 2. Reticulofenestra, Blackites, Chiasmolithus, Lophodolithus, Transversopontis, Ellipsolithus, Discoaster, Campylosphaera, and Zygrhablithus FIGURES 1. Map showing localities in Alabama and western Georgia discussed in text 2 2. Correlation chart showing age placements for the Tallahatta and other formations of late Paleocene to middle Eocene age in Alabama and Georgia 3 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Economic Geology W
    Bureau of Economic Geology W. L. Fisher, Director ad interim The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-8924 • 1999 Report of Investigations No. 256 Groundwater Availability in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Central Texas­ Numerical Simulations of 2000 through 2050 Withdrawal Projections by Alan R. Dutton Sponsored by Texas Water Development Board Contract No. 99-483-279 Cosponsored by San Antonio Water System Alcoa Inc. Aqua Water Supply Corporation Bureau of Economic Geology ~ 9 W. L. Fisher, Director ad interim ~ .. The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-8924 • 1999 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................................................. 1 Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model ........................................................................................... 4 Data Availability .............................................................................................................................. 4 Hydrostratigraphy .......................................................................................................................... 4 Flow Paths and Flow Rates ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Alabama College of Engineering Bureau of Engineering Research
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING BUREAU OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH U,"lmade available under NASA sPonrsl q-0n the interesid ie dis- ,.4N FINAL REPORT Somination of Ladh fesources Survey au Program informa,"on 'j.jioo ut liability So VOLUME THREE r ony use made thereot." m of Contract NAS5-21876 PD INVESTIGATIONS USING DATA N o ALABAMA FROM ERTS-A Q) U 14 p .Principal Investigator " P-"DR. HAROLD R. HENRY Submitted to -O ...4 Goddard Space Flight Center 0M ( National Aeronautics and Space Administration S 0 Greenbelt, Maryland H Po August,, 1974 0 *C4 o l4 BER Report No. 179-122 -U N I V E R 8IT Y, ALABA M A 35486 44. INVESTIGATIONS USING DATA IN ALABAMA FROM ERTS-A FINAL REPORT VOLUME THREE Contract NAS5-21876 GSFC Proposal No. 271 Principal Investigator DR. HAROLD R. HENRY GSFC ID UN604 Submitted to Goddard Space Flight Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Greenbelt, Maryland Submitted by Bureau,.of Engineering Research The University of Alabama. University, Alabama August, 19i4 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA STUDIES James A. Drahovzal SECTION TWELVE of VOLUME THREE INVESTIGATIONS USING DATA IN ALABAMA FROM ERTS-A CONTENTS SECTION TWELVE INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 LINEAMENTS ......................................................... 24 A COMPARISON OF LINEAMENTS AND FRACTURE TRACES TO JOINTING IN THE APPALACHIAN PLATEAU OF ALABAMA -- DORA-SYLVAN SPRINGS AREA .... 146 LINEAMENT ANALYSIS OF ERTS-1 IMAGERY OF THE ALABAMA PIEDMONT ...... 181 LINEAMENT ANALYSIS IN THE CROOKED CREEK AREA, CLAY AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES, ALABAMA ......................................... 209 GEOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF LINEAMENTS ............................... 226 HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION AND APPLICATION OF ERTS DATA ................ 404 A COMPARISON OF SINKHOLE, CAVE, JOINT AND LINEAMENT ORIENTATIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of the Eocene Formations in Mississippi and Alabama
    CORRELATION OF THE EOCENE FORMATIONS IN MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA By WYTHE CooKE INTRODUCTION clay and carbonaceous mate,rial were laid down in During Eocene time the site of the boundary be­ Mississippi, while shell marl, laminated sand, and tween the States of Mississippi and Alabama fell limestone were being formed in Alabama. The pur­ within the transition zone between the ¥ississippi pose of this paper is to point out the equivalences of embayment and the open Gulf of Mexico. That dif­ formations of different facies in the two States. The ferent types of deposition proceeded simultaneously correlation adopted is shown in the following table, within these two regions may be inferred from the all the formation names in which have been previ­ different facies which deposits of the same age exhibit ously used, except Kosciusko sandstone, a new name on opposite sides of the State line. In general, much proposed for a member of the Lisbon formation. Correlation of Eocene formations in Mississippi and Alabama Mississippi Alabama I Yazoo clay member Jackson Jackson ····························-······················---------·---·--·-········------------·····------- ---- --- Ocala limestone formation forma- east of Tombigbee River Moodys marl member tion I· Yegua formation Gosport sand i P. ;::! I 0 ························-····················------ ----- ------- -- --· ·······- -- -------------················ bh Lisbon ~ ~ forma- Kosciusko sandstone member Lisbon formation 1-o 0 tion :9 --··········-·····--------- -- -- --- ----- ---- ----- ------ -----·--------- -- -- -- ---· - --· ···········-- --- -- -- -- - • ~ 0 Winona sand member I Tallahatta formation Over- Grenada formation lapped Hatchetigbee formation area 0.. ;::! 0 Absent Bashi formation 6h M 0 0 Holly Springs sand Tuscahoma formation ~ I Over- lapped near Over- Tennessee Ackerman formation lapped Nanafalia formation boundary area Unex- I 0.. Tippah sandstone member plored Naheola formation ;::! Porters area 0 Creek to clay ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Coal Resources of the Coal-Bearing Rocks of Alabama
    Geology and Coal Resources of the Coal-Bearing Rocks of Alabama ~y WILLIAM C. CULBERTSON :ONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1182-B A detailed estimate of the reserves of coal in Alabama and a description of the ~tratigraphy of the coal-hearing rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin!l Office WashinJ1ton, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- B1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------ 2 Acknowledgments--------------------------------------------- 4 Location and structure of coal fields _______ ------------------------__ 4 StratigraphY------------------------------------------------------ 7 Parkwood Formation _______________________ -------_-----______ 7 Cliff coal bed_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 8 Pottsville Formation___________________________________________ 8 Plateau coal field (excluding Blount Mountain)________________ 10 Underwood coal bed ___ ------ _______ ------------------_ 11 Upper Cliff coal beds ___________________ -'-______________ 12 Sewanee and Tatum coal beds___________________________ 13 Plateau coal field (Blount Mountain)________________________ 13 Swansea coal bed _________________________ ------------- 14 Altoona coal bed_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ _
    [Show full text]