DOCSLIB.ORG

Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States Part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States Part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources —Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States Part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin By Paul C. Hackley U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Hackley, P.C., 2012, Geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources—Middle Eocene Claiborne Group, United States part of the Gulf of Mexico Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Open–File Report 2012–1144, 87 p., available only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1144/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Unit and Petroleum System Concepts ................................................................................................... 3 Data Sources and Discovery History Analysis ........................................................................................................... 4 Regional Geologic and Structural Setting ...................................................................................................................... 4 Structural Setting........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Stratigraphy .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Paleogeography, Sediment Source Areas, and Depositional Systems .................................................................... 20 Elements of the Petroleum System .............................................................................................................................. 23 Source Rocks and Thermal Maturation .................................................................................................................... 23 Migration of Hydrocarbons ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Reservoir Rocks ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 Lower Claiborne - Queen City Sand and Reklaw Formation ................................................................................ 28 Middle Claiborne – Sparta Sand and Cook Mountain Formation .......................................................................... 30 Upper Claiborne – Yegua and Cockfield Formations ............................................................................................ 31 Traps and Seals ....................................................................................................................................................... 33 Influence of the Louann Salt .................................................................................................................................... 35 Overview of Claiborne Exploration and Production History .......................................................................................... 35 Resource Assessment ................................................................................................................................................. 36 Comparisons with the 1995 Assessment ................................................................................................................. 38 Geologic Model ........................................................................................................................................................ 39 Stable Shelf .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 Expanded Fault Zone ........................................................................................................................................... 41 Slope and Basin Floor .......................................................................................................................................... 42 Data Supporting the Geologic Model .................................................................................................................... 43 Lower Claiborne Stable Shelf Gas and Oil (50470120) ............................................................................................ 43 Lower Claiborne Expanded Fault Zone Gas (50470121) ......................................................................................... 50 Lower Claiborne Slope and Basin Floor Gas (50470122) ........................................................................................ 52 Lower Claiborne Cane River (50470123) ................................................................................................................. 54 Upper Claiborne Stable Shelf Gas and Oil (50470124) ............................................................................................ 54 Upper Claiborne Expanded Fault Zone Gas (50470125) ......................................................................................... 57 Upper Claiborne Slope and Basin Floor Gas (50470126) ........................................................................................ 60 References Cited ......................................................................................................................................................... 62 Appendix A .................................................................................................................................................................. 74 Appendix B .................................................................................................................................................................. 76 Appendix C .................................................................................................................................................................. 78 Appendix D .................................................................................................................................................................. 80 Appendix E .................................................................................................................................................................. 82 Appendix F .................................................................................................................................................................. 84 Appendix G .................................................................................................................................................................. 86 iii Figures 1 Map of Gulf Coast States showing petroleum province boundaries, outline of Upper Jurassic- Cretaceous-Tertiary Composite total petroleum system (in part), Claiborne Group outcrop, and the upper Wilcox Group shelf margin ................................................................................................................ 3 2. Generalized stratigraphic section of the northern Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain showing potential hydrocarbon source rock intervals ..................................................................................................... 5 3. Map showing Upper Jurassic-Cretaceous-Tertiary Composite total petroleum system (TPS) for the Gulf of Mexico Basin ................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Stratigraphy of the Claiborne Group. ................................................................................................................ 8 5. Map showing study area (onshore U.S. Gulf Coast and State waters) showing Claiborne Group outcrop, Wilcox and Claiborne expansion faults, and outline of major structural features ................................ 9 6. Map showing study area showing approximate locations of Claiborne Group oil and gas reservoirs ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Histogram of depth to top of Claiborne Group reservoirs, Texas and Louisiana ............................................. 11 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is a Salt Dome? How Do They Form? 3/2/18, 4:06 PM What Is a Salt Dome?
    What is a Salt Dome? How do they form? 3/2/18, 4:06 PM What is a Salt Dome? » » Salt Domes Columns of salt that intrude through overlying sediment units. Middle Jurassic salt: This cross-section shows rocks of the East Texas Basin between the Oklahoma-Texas border (on the left) and the Gulf of Mexico coastline (on the right). The purple rock unit is the Middle Jurassic salt, a rock unit that has the ability to flow under pressure. The salt is overlain by thousands of feet of sediment which place enormous pressure on the surface of the salt and cause it to flow. At numerous locations the salt has intruded upwards into overlying sediments. This has produced small mounds or towering columns of salt that can be thousands of feet tall. The salt columns and smaller mounds are called "salt domes." USGS image [1]. https://geology.com/stories/13/salt-domes/ Page 1 of 12 What is a Salt Dome? How do they form? 3/2/18, 4:06 PM Salt Dome: Cartoon of a salt dome showing piercement through two rock units and deformation of the rock unit immediately above. Growth of the dome is accomplished by migration of salt into the dome from surrounding areas. The salt migrates into the dome because it is compressed by the weight of overlying sediments. What is a Salt Dome? A salt dome is a mound or column of salt that has intruded upwards into overlying sediments. Salt domes can form in a sedimentary basin where a thick layer of salt is overlain by younger sediments of significant thickness.
    [Show full text]
  • B-127 Lithostratigraphic Framework Of
    &A 'NlOO,G-3 &i flo, 12 7 g l F£i&f THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF \;\ .-t "- THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour Work Performed in Cooperation with United States Geological Survey (Cooperative Agreement Number 1434-92-A-0959) and U. S. Department of Energy (Cooperative Agreement Number DE-FG-09-92SR12868) GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lonice C. Barrett, Commissioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Harold F. Reheis, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 ABSTRACT One new formation, two new members, and a redefinition of an established lithostratigraphic unit are formally introduced here. The Oconee Group is formally recognized in the Savannah River area and four South Carolina Formations not previously used in Georgia by the Georgia Geologic Survey are recognized in eastern Burke County. The Still Branch Sand is a new formation and the two new members are the Bennock Millpond Sand Member of the Still Branch Sand and the Blue Bluff Member of the Lisbon Formation. The four South Carolina formations recognized in eastern Burke CountY include the Steel Creek Formation and Snapp Formation of the Oconee Group, the Black Mingo Formation (undifferentiated), and the Congaree Formation. The Congaree Formation and Still Branch Sand are considered to be lithostratigraphic components of the Claiborne Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,E @F T the Claibornian Stage
    The Eocene TaJJahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,e @f t The Claibornian Stage U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1615 The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Age of The Claibornian Stage By laurel M. Bybell and Thomas G. Gibson U.S. GEOlOGICAl SURVEY BUllETIN 1615 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1985 For sale by the Distribution Branch, Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett St. Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bybell, Laurel M. The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia. <U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1615) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1615 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Eocene. 2. Geology--Alabama. 3. Geology-­ Georgia. I. Gibson, Thomas G. II. Title. III. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1615 557.3 s [551.7'84] 84-600098 [QE692.2] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 1 Acknowledgments 2 Lithostratigraphy 2 Biostratigraphy 7 Paleoenvironmental analysis 15 The Tallahatta and the age of the Claibornian Stage 17 Conclusions 18 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates follow references cited] 1. Discoaster, Tribrachiatus, Helicosphaera, Rhabdosphaera, Transversopontis, Cyclococcolithus, and Reticulofenestra 2. Reticulofenestra, Blackites, Chiasmolithus, Lophodolithus, Transversopontis, Ellipsolithus, Discoaster, Campylosphaera, and Zygrhablithus FIGURES 1. Map showing localities in Alabama and western Georgia discussed in text 2 2. Correlation chart showing age placements for the Tallahatta and other formations of late Paleocene to middle Eocene age in Alabama and Georgia 3 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Economic Geology W
    Bureau of Economic Geology W. L. Fisher, Director ad interim The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-8924 • 1999 Report of Investigations No. 256 Groundwater Availability in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Central Texas­ Numerical Simulations of 2000 through 2050 Withdrawal Projections by Alan R. Dutton Sponsored by Texas Water Development Board Contract No. 99-483-279 Cosponsored by San Antonio Water System Alcoa Inc. Aqua Water Supply Corporation Bureau of Economic Geology ~ 9 W. L. Fisher, Director ad interim ~ .. The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-8924 • 1999 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................................................. 1 Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model ........................................................................................... 4 Data Availability .............................................................................................................................. 4 Hydrostratigraphy .......................................................................................................................... 4 Flow Paths and Flow Rates ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of the Eocene Formations in Mississippi and Alabama
    CORRELATION OF THE EOCENE FORMATIONS IN MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA By WYTHE CooKE INTRODUCTION clay and carbonaceous mate,rial were laid down in During Eocene time the site of the boundary be­ Mississippi, while shell marl, laminated sand, and tween the States of Mississippi and Alabama fell limestone were being formed in Alabama. The pur­ within the transition zone between the ¥ississippi pose of this paper is to point out the equivalences of embayment and the open Gulf of Mexico. That dif­ formations of different facies in the two States. The ferent types of deposition proceeded simultaneously correlation adopted is shown in the following table, within these two regions may be inferred from the all the formation names in which have been previ­ different facies which deposits of the same age exhibit ously used, except Kosciusko sandstone, a new name on opposite sides of the State line. In general, much proposed for a member of the Lisbon formation. Correlation of Eocene formations in Mississippi and Alabama Mississippi Alabama I Yazoo clay member Jackson Jackson ····························-······················---------·---·--·-········------------·····------- ---- --- Ocala limestone formation forma- east of Tombigbee River Moodys marl member tion I· Yegua formation Gosport sand i P. ;::! I 0 ························-····················------ ----- ------- -- --· ·······- -- -------------················ bh Lisbon ~ ~ forma- Kosciusko sandstone member Lisbon formation 1-o 0 tion :9 --··········-·····--------- -- -- --- ----- ---- ----- ------ -----·--------- -- -- -- ---· - --· ···········-- --- -- -- -- - • ~ 0 Winona sand member I Tallahatta formation Over- Grenada formation lapped Hatchetigbee formation area 0.. ;::! 0 Absent Bashi formation 6h M 0 0 Holly Springs sand Tuscahoma formation ~ I Over- lapped near Over- Tennessee Ackerman formation lapped Nanafalia formation boundary area Unex- I 0.. Tippah sandstone member plored Naheola formation ;::! Porters area 0 Creek to clay ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Drilling Project Initial Reports Volume 10
    29. REGIONAL ASPECTS OF DEEP SEA DRILLING IN THE GULF OF MEXICO LEG 10 J. Lamar Worzel, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Marine Biomedical Institute, University of Texas at Galveston, Texas and William R. Bryant, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas INTRODUCTION creasing amounts of gases. Beacon failure, causing loss of Leg 10 extended the drilling information in the Gulf of ability to properly control position while drilling, caused Mexico begun on Leg 1. The summary of results for Leg termination of Site 96 because there was only one effec- 1 in the Gulf of Mexico is reported by Ewing, Worzel, and tive beacon left, and it was deemed more important to drill Burk, (1969, p. 624). Figure 1 (reproduced from that re- Site 97 than to continue Site 96. Site 97 was most difficult port) shows the most important physiographic features of because of beacon troubles and the strong currents, no the Gulf including the known regions of salt domes and doubt associated with the Gulf Stream. Although the cur- the three holes drilled in the Gulf of Mexico during Leg rent charts indicated we should expect strong currents 1. As a short resume, Site 1, drilled to a subbottom depth from the northwest, we experienced 4- to 5-knot currents of 770.5 meters near the foot of the Sigsbee Scarp, encoun- from the southwest for the 2.5 days we were on station. tered only Pleistocene and Holocene sediments with abun- The thrusters were not adequate to keep the ship on sta- dant evidence that most, if not all, of the section drilled tion, so the computer program for position keeping had to was slump material.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Study Along Highway 45 from Tennessee Line to Meridian, Mississippi
    Geologic Study Along Highway 45 From Tennessee Line to Meridian, Mississippi DONALD M. KEADY Prepared in cooperation with the Mississippi State Highway Department BULLETIN 94 MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TRACY WALLACE LUSK Director and State Geologist UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1962 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Hon. Ross Robert Barnett Governor MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOARD Hon. Henry N. Toler, Chairman Jackson Hon. William E. Johnson, Vice Chairman Jackson Hon. D. H. Echols Jackson Hon. D. T. Keel Oxford Hon. Richard R. Priddy Jackson STAFF Tracy Wallace Lusk, M. S Director and State Geologist William Scott Parks, M. S Geologist William Halsell Moore, M. S Stratigrapher Marshall Keith Kern, B. S Geologist Margaret McCorkle Jones, M. S Secretary Elizabeth Worley Nix, B. A Librarian LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Office of the Mississippi Geological Survey University, Mississippi June 29, 1962 Hon. Henry N. Toler, Chairman, and Members of the Geological Survey Board Gentlemen: Herewith is Mississippi Geological Survey Bulletin 94, Geologic Study Along Highway 45 From Tennessee Line to Meridian, Mississippi, by Donald M. Keady. A pressing need for prompt information along the southernmost part of this study area was the deciding factor in the selection of a highway for geologic investigation. This series of reports began in the summer of 1959 and has continued each succeeding summer—this being the third published bulletin. The author follows closely the pattern previously set, in that he describes in detail the geologic units that crop out along the route and points to specific locations for obtaining suitable topping material. He also describes the structural and geomorphic features exhibited. The writer has properly acknowledged the personnel of the Mis sissippi State Highway Department for their cooperation, nevertheless, it is fitting that these men be recognized here—Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 372 Water Quality in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer 1990-2006
    Water Quality in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer, 1990–2006 by Radu Boghici Report 372 Texas Water Development Board January 2009 www.twdb.state.tx.us Texas Water Development Board Report 372 Water Quality in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer 1990–2006 by Radu Boghici January 2009 Cover photo: Carrizo sandstone excavated at Copperas Creek near State Highway 71, Bastrop County, Texas; Courtesy of J. Tuason (c) 2008 Texas Water Development Board James E. Herring Chairman, Amarillo Jack Hunt Vice Chairman, Houston Joe M. Crutcher Member, Palestine Thomas Weir Labatt III Member, San Antonio Lewis H. McMahan Member, Dallas Edward G. Vaughan Member, Boerne J. Kevin Ward Executive Administrator Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e., not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. The Board would appreciate acknowledgment. The use of brand names in this publication does not indicate an endorsement by the Texas Water Development Board or the State of Texas. Published and distributed by the Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 January 2009 (Printed on recycled paper) This page is intentionally blank. Table of ConTenTs 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................1 2 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................2 3 Water-bearing
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Madof Etal. (2017).Pdf
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 80 (2017) 492e516 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Research paper Unreciprocated sedimentation along a mud-dominated continental margin, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.: Implications for sequence stratigraphy in muddy settings devoid of depositional sequences Andrew S. Madof a, *, Nicholas Christie-Blick b, Mark H. Anders c, Lawrence A. Febo a a Chevron Energy Technology Company, Houston, TX 77002-7308, USA b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA c Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA article info abstract Article history: According to widely accepted sequence stratigraphic and fill-and-spill models, sedimentary cyclicity Received 6 July 2015 along continental margins is modulated by relative sea-level change, whereas smaller-scale intraslope Received in revised form accommodation is controlled by the filling of pre-existing bathymetric depressions. Although these 24 December 2016 concepts are presumed to apply to shelf-to-slope settings regardless of grain size, we have tested both Accepted 24 December 2016 hypotheses in the mud-prone lower Pliocene to Holocene of offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico, and reach Available online 26 December 2016 different conclusions. We determine that over the last ~3.7 Myr, differential accumulation and accom- panying salt tectonism dislocated the fine-grained shelf and slope, prevented the development of Keywords: e fi Gulf of Mexico sedimentary reciprocity at 10 100 kyr time scales, and inhibited ll-and-spill accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of the Megatoothed Sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 14 October 2014. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/625), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Ehret DJ, Ebersole J. 2014. Occurrence of the megatoothed sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA. PeerJ 2:e625 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.625 Occurrence of the Megatoothed sharks (Lamniformes:Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA The Otodontidae include some of the largest sharks to ever live in the world’s oceans (i.e. Carcharocles megalodon). Here we report on Paleocene and Eocene occurrences of Otodus obliquus and Carcharocles auriculatus from Alabama, USA. Teeth of Otodus are rarely encountered in the Gulf Coastal Plain and this report is one of the first records for Alabama. Carcharocles auriculatus is more common in the Eocene deposits of Alabama, but its occurrence has been largely overlooked in the literature. We also refute the occurrence of the Oligocene Carcharocles angustidens in the state. Raised awareness and PrePrints increased collecting of under-sampled geologic formations in Alabama will likely increase sample sizes of O. obliquus and C. auriculatus and also might unearth other otodontids, such as C. megalodon and C. chubutensis. PeerJ PrePrints | http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.517v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 29 Sep 2014, publ: 29 Sep 2014 1 Occurrence of the Megatoothed sharks (Lamniformes:Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA 2 Authors: Ehret, Dana J.1 and Ebersole, Jun2 3 1Alabama Museum of Natural History, PO Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0340 4 Email: [email protected] 5 2McWane Science Center, 200 19th Street North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203 6 Email: [email protected] 7 Corresponding Author: Ehret, Dana J.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Palynology to Determine Age And
    USING PALYNOLOGY TO DETERMINE AGE AND PALEOENVIRONMENT OF PALEOCENE-EOCENE WILCOX GROUP SEDIMENTS IN BASTROP, TEXAS A Dissertation by REGINA LEA DICKEY Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Thomas Yancey Committee Members, Deborah Thomas Vaughn Bryant Anne Raymond Yeufeng Sun Head of Department, Michael Pope August 2017 Major Subject: Geology Copyright 2017 Regina L. Dickey ABSTRACT The Wilcox Group is an important group of sediments derived primarily from the Laramide orogeny in the western United States. It is important for paleoclimatological and paleoenvironmental studies, as it was deposited during the time of the Paleocene- Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), a time of rapid global increase in temperature. Wilcox Group sediments extend from central Texas into the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, but correlating these sediments is extremely difficult due to increased basinward faulting and sparse fossil content. The lack of macrofossils exists because sedimentation rates were high and large amounts of plant material were deposited, resulting in the destruction of calcareous fossils due to production of acids from decaying plant material. Thus, palynology remains the key to understanding these deposits. Palynological sampling within shoaling-upward regressive deposits in the upper Calvert Bluff Fm at Red Bluff and overlying transgressive deposits of the Carrizo Fm, exposed beside the Colorado River near Bastrop, Texas, reveals a rich assemblage of well-preserved palynomorphs. This section contains an unconformity possibly equivalent to the sequence boundary between the Middle Wilcox and Upper Wilcox of the subsurface and previously thought to coincide with the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 365 Chapter 2
    Chapter 2 Geology of the Gulf Coast Aquifer, Texas Ali H. Chowdhury, Ph.D., P.G.1 and Mike J. Turco2 Introduction The Gulf Coast aquifer in Texas extends over 430 miles from the Texas-Louisiana border in the northeast to the Texas-Mexico border in the south (Figure 2-1). Over 1.1 million acre-feet of groundwater are annually pumped from this aquifer in Texas. A large portion of this water supply is used for irrigation and drinking water purposes by the fast growing communities along the Texas Gulf Coast. The geology of the Gulf Coast aquifer in Texas is complex due to cyclic deposition of sedimentary facies. Sediments of the Gulf Coast aquifer were mainly deposited in the coastal plains of the Gulf of Mexico Basin. These sediments were deposited under a fluvial-deltaic to shallow-marine environments during the Miocene to the Pleistocene periods. Repeated sea-level changes and natural basin subsidence produced discontinuous beds of sand, silt, clay, and gravel. Six major sediment dispersal systems that sourced large deltas distributed sediments from erosion of the Laramide Uplift along the Central and southern Rockies and Sierra Madre Oriental (Galloway and others, 2000; Galloway, 2005). Geographic locations of the various fluvial systems remained relatively persistent, but the locations of the depocenters where the thickest sediment accumulations occurred shifted at different times (Solis, 1981). Stratigraphic classification of the Gulf Coast aquifer in Texas is complex and controversial, with more than seven classifications proposed. However, Baker’s (1979) classification based on fauna, electric logs, facies associations, and hydraulic properties of the sediments has received widespread acceptance.
    [Show full text]