DOCSLIB.ORG

Manydown, Basingstoke Built Heritage Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manydown, Basingstoke Built Heritage Statement Land at Manydown, shaping a place, creating a community Basingstoke MSD12dR: Heritage Report ES Appendix 8.2 MSD13: Environmental Statement Addendum Revision July 2018 Appendix E - Heritage Report Note: This document is a revision and supersedes MSD12d Heritage Report ES Ap 8.2 (March 2017) shaping a place, creating a community MSD12d: Heritage Report ES Appendix 8.2 MSD13: Environmental Statement Addendum Appendix E - Heritage Report Q amended the annotation of the mixed-use areas on the Land Use Parameter Summary of changes Plan to clarify that these show the approximate location and extent of the A note regarding changes to application material Since the original submission in March 2017, there have been a number of changes mixed-uses, with the exact boundaries to be determined through reserved In the light of the changes to the application some of the application material has matters; to the planning application in response to comments from Statutory Consultees, been revised and other additional material is supplemented by an addendum, in members of the public and the Local Planning Authority. In summary, these changes Q the northern neighbourhood park has been amended so that the main street response to requests for further information or clarification. are as follows: no longer cuts through the middle of it, and it has been located further from the This is arranged so that where a document has been fully updated and replaces A339 than in the original planning application. The park measures 3.5 hectares the original it is identified with an ‘R’ after its reference number e.g. MSD2R. In this Q confirmation that the Proposed Development will be for approximately 3,200 in area; homes (up to a maximum of 3,520 homes). Within the ES submitted as part of case the original document is no longer a relevant consideration in relation to the the planning application in February 2017, assessments had adopted up to 3,520 Q it has been clarified in the key to the Open Space and Landscape Parameter application. In general throughout these documents the changes are highlighted in residential dwellings as a sensitivity test; Plan that each of the neighbourhood parks will meet the adopted Green Space blue so that they can be clearly identified. Standards (July 2013) minimum size requirement of being 2ha; Q changes have been made to the building heights for each of the areas on the Where additional material is provided as an addendum that is to be read alongside Building Heights and Density Parameter Plan. The building height for buildings Q addition of an area of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Green corridors the originally submitted document it is identified with an ‘A’ after its reference of up to 2 storeys and up to 3 storeys have been reduced by 1m to 10m and 13m and Buffers’ south of A339 where the potential location of allotments is number e.g. MSD5A which is to be read alongside MSD5. respectively. The maximum building height for buildings up to 4 storeys and up identified; For a full list of application documents please refer to the covering letter dated July to 5 storeys have been reduced by 2m to 15m and 18m respectively; Q addition of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Green Corridors and 2018. Q the key on the Building Heights and Density Parameter Plan has been amended Buffers’ to the south of the B3400 and ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green to state they are ‘up to’ a maximum number of storeys; Space: Biodiversity and Landscape Features’ to the north of the B3400; Q reduction in maximum building heights on Worting Road (reduced to a Q extension of the 25 metre noise and vibration buffer adjacent to the railway on maximum of up 2 and up to 3 storeys) and the western boundary of the Worting the Open Space and Landscape Parameter Plan so that this extends to the full Conservation Area, which has been reduced to up to 3 storeys maximum; developable frontage with the railway; Q reduction in the maximum proposed overall height of buildings around Worting Q the key on the Open Space and Landscape Parameter Plan has been updated Wood Cottage to up to 4 storeys maximum; to note that the areas of ‘Strategic Multi-Functional Green Space: Visual Buffers’ also include biodiversity features; Q reduction in the maximum proposed height of buildings fronting the Central Neighbourhood park and existing lane to up to 4 storeys maximum; Q the locations of some of the primary sustainable drainage (SuDS) features have been amended to take account of the amendments to other elements of the Q reduction in the area of higher density development in the vicinity of Church Lane, Proposed Development. These primary SuDS features are however all retained with the frontage of this area of development moved further east, away from the within the strategic areas of the Site required for the proposed surface water Lane; drainage strategy; Q reduction in the building height for small scale ancillary buildings outside built Q amendment of proposed green corridors, buffers and strategic green space development zones, so that these are limited to up to a maximum of 2 storeys to accommodate the amended principal access junction designs and revised and up to 10m maximum; alignment of Worting Road; Q an overlap has been introduced between the development areas and the Q change in the design and layout of the primary access junction into the Site neighbourhood parks to reflect the fact that the exact outline shape of the park from the A339. This junction previously comprised improvements to the will be determined through reserved matters. Development of these overlapping existing A339 / Roman Road roundabout, closure of the Roman Road arm areas will generally relate to the proposed building heights and densities in the of the roundabout and construction of a new arm to the roundabout that adjacent development areas; would link to Main Street. The amended junction layout has been designed in Q changes have been made to the proposed residential density ranges shown on consultation with HCC Highways to improve the through flow of traffic along the Building Heights and Density Parameter Plan. These were 15 to 30, 25 to the A339. It still proposes closure of the Roman Road arm of the existing 45 and 40 to 60 in the original submission and these have been amended to 15 roundabout but introduces a new roundabout on the A339 to the west of the to 30, 30 to 40, 40 to 60 and up to 60 dwellings per hectare for the mixed-use existing, which provides the northern junction with Main Street. The updated centres within the revised submission; layout also introduces a new highway layout for the section of the A339 between the two roundabouts; Q a note has been added to the Building Heights and Density Parameter Plan noting that where density ranges are stated with a lower limit (ie. 15-30, 30-40 & Q change in the design and layout of the primary access junction into the Site 40-60 dph) there is an allowance for some parcels to come forward below (only) from the B3400 Worting Road; from a single crossroads junction to a layout the lower range, where the masterplanning phase ahead of reserved matters with two junctions: a roundabout and a crossroads. This amended junction demonstrates improved design outcomes; layout includes amendments to the alignment of Worting Road and a new section of Main Street and will reduce traffic flows through the southern Q realignment of the residential parcel closest to the A339 to take account of the neighbourhood centre; revised junction design and alignment; Q change in the design and layout of the northern and southern sections of Main Q realignment of residential parcels to accommodate changes in layout; Street through the Site; and Q confirmation that five permanent Gypsy and Traveller pitches will be provided at a Q updates to pedestrian and cycle routes between the Site and the wider single location; Basingstoke area. Q reduction in the number of potential secondary school sites, from three to one. The preferred location for the secondary school site has been advised by HCC subsequent to the planning application being submitted; Q introduction of icons to show the approximate location for the primary school(s) and the secondary school, with their likely size being shown at the same scale in the key; Built Heritage Statement In respect of: Land at Manydown Basingstoke Outline Application Submission on behalf of: Hampshire County Council Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Document Reference: RPS CgMs Ref: JCG20124 July 2018 USVJURXSFRPXN_FJPVFRXN CONTENTS CONTENTS Pages Prepared by: Executive Summary 3 Elizabeth Da Silva BA (Hons) 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Legislative and Planning Policy Framework 2.1 Legislation and National Planning Policy 5 Authorised by: 2.2 National Planning Guidance 6 2.3 Local Planning Policy and Guidance 9 Jonathan Smith BA (Hons) MA PGCE PGDip MCIfA IHBC 3.0 Architectural and Historical Appraisal 3.1 Historical Development 11 Report Status: 3.2 Historic Map Regression 14 FINAL 3.4 Historic Environment Records 16 4.0 Assessment of Significance RPS CgMs Ref: 4.1 Site Assessment 18 4.2 Worting Conservation Area 20 JCG20124 4.3 Statutorily Listed Buildings 22 4.4 Non-designated Heritage Asset 27 Issue Date: 5.0 Proposals and Assessment of Impact 5.1 Development Proposals 28 July 2018 5.2 Assessment of Impact 29 COPYRIGHT © RPS CgMs 6.0 Conclusion 47 The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or Appendices: person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS CgMs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Prior's Mansion at Michelmersh
    Proc Hampsh Field Club Archaeol Soc 48, 1992, 107-119 A PRIOR'S MANSION AT MICHELMERSH by EDWARD ROBERTS INTRODUCTION 12-20). Indeed, the St Swithun's compotus rolls show that the prior lived as a great feudal lord Michelmersh lies a few miles north of Romsey with a retinue of officials and servants. He paid beside the river Test. It has long been known frequent visits to his several country houses in that the Manor Farm there contains medieval Hampshire, sometimes for extended periods stonework (Suckling 1914, xxiv) but recent during which there was much feasting and restoration has revealed a fourteenth-century possibly some hunting too, for many of the solar range virtually intact and the frag­ houses had associated deer parks (Fig 1; mentary remains of two other medieval Kitchin 1892, 33^*; Greatrex 1973 ii, xxxiii, buildings. These surviving structures were lxiii; Drew 1939, 1943 and 1945 passim). only part of a mansion, or large country resi­ As a general rule, it seems that the prior's dence, belonging to the priory of St Swithun, mansions had a camera domini or private the cathedral priory of Winchester. chamber for the prior, additional rooms for his The chief documentary sources for a study household or visitors, a chapel and a gate­ of the scale and nature of this mansion are house. Often they were built of stone or, in the fourteen manorial compotus rolls dating from case of Silkstead, of brick (Drew 1939, 99). 1248 to 1326 in Winchester Cathedral Library Michelmersh fulfilled all these criteria, as we (Drew 1943, 86) and two early fifteenth- shall see, but elsewhere the evidence is less century compotus rolls in the Hampshire Record complete and it is possible that the mansions Office (HRO 5M50/2691-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Systems and Demesne Farming on the Wiltshire Estates of Saint Swithun's Priory, Winchester, I248-134O* by BAN KY HAR KISON
    Field Systems and Demesne Farming on the Wiltshire Estates of Saint Swithun's Priory, Winchester, I248-134o* By BAN_KY HAR_KISON Abstract Manorial compoti are used to describe the demesne agriculture of Winchester Cathedral Priory on its chalkland manors in Wihshire between I248 and I34o. The demesnes are found to have been operated largely within the two-field systems of the viUs even where, at first sight, the use of independent furlongs seems to be suggested. The disadvantages of this system were partly offset by the priory's near monopoly of pasture, hay and timber resources, as well as by the absence of sub-manors and freeholds. Nevertheless, productivity is found to be low - although no lower than on other demesnes in the same district - but some evidence of intensification through the use of legumes and relatively high stocking ratios has been found for certain cereals on a few manors where market sale rather than monastic supply was the main object of arable farming. EDIEWL farming practices in local level has indeed been undertaken Wiltshire are better known than with impressive results for the later medie- M those of other Wessex counties val and early modem periods but compari- thanks largely to a long tradition of local sons with the earlier period, before the journal and record publications, and to the Black Death, tend to be based either upon thoroughly researched parish surveys in the much older work or upon the parish sur- on-going Victoria County History. The veys in the Victoria County History. ~ The emphasis has admittedly been on demesne editors of the latter have certainly consulted rather than on peasant agriculture, but that the full range of primary sources but they is perhaps inevitable given that the main have not been able to do more than dip sources are the surveys, custumals, account into them at particular points in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Cathedral Close
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS ' 9 WINCHESTER CATHEDRAL CLOSE. By T. D. ATKINSON. Present Lay-out. HE Cathedral precincts of to-day are conterminous with those of the Middle Ages-containing the Priory of Saint Swithun, T and are still surrounded by the great wall of the monastery. ' But while the church itself has been lucky in escaping most of the misfortunes which have overtaken so many cathedral and other churches, the monastic, buildings have been among the most unfortunate. The greater number have been entirely destroyed. The present lay-out of the Close not only tells us nothing of the monastic plan, but so far as possible misleads us. The only building which informs us of anything that we could not have guessed for ourselves is the Deanery. That does tell us at least where the Prior v lived. For the rest, the site of the very dorter, as the monks called their dormitory, is uncertain, while we are still more ignorant of the position of the infirmary, a great building probably measuring 200. feet by 50 feet.1 There is little left either of material remains, or of documentary evidence to give us a hint on these things, for the documents have perished and the general topography has been turned upside down and its character entirely transformed. Upside down because the main entrance to the precincts is now on the South, whereas it was formerly to the North, and transformed because the straight walks . of the cloister and the square courts and gardens harmonizing with the architecture have given place to elegant serpentine carriage sweeps which branch into one another with easy curves, like a well-planned railway junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Tithe Award for the Parish of Wootton St Lawrence
    Tithe Award for the Parish of Wootton St Lawrence Confirmed 13th February 1846 WRO 21M65 F7/268/1 Tithe Award for the Parish of Wootton St Lawrence In The County Of Southampton Confirmed 13th February 1846 WRO 21M65 F7/268/1 Notes This Tithe Award and it's accompanying map where transcribed from the original documents held at The Hampshire Record Office, Winchester, Hampshire and produced here with their kind permission. The main text of the Award and the attached schedule and summary are produced here in their original format. This original schedule is arranged alphabetically by Landowner. It should be noted that the Ref No shown in the extreme left hand column of the alphabetic schedule does not appear in the original document. A second schedule, derived from the original schedule, is also included. Here the entries have been rearranged in numerical order by Map Reference Number. The Ref No is included to allow easy cross-referencing between the two schedules. Copies of this Transcript and the accompanying Tithe Map can be obtained from:- G Dutton 7 Ashe Park Cottages Steventon Basingstoke Hants RG25 3AY email: [email protected] © G Dutton 12th July 2003 Contents Page Legal Agreement of Apportionment 2 Schedule of Rent Charge Apportionments (Listed Alphabetically by Land Owner) 6 Summary of Holdings and Rent Charges 29 Numeric Listing of Holdings by Map Reference 34 Page 1 Wootton St Lawrence - Tithe Apportionment Legal Agreement of Apportionment Page 2 Agreement APPORTIONMENT of the RENT-CHARGE in lieu of TITHES in the Parish
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study on Jane Austen S and Pramoedya
    MARRIAGE AND MATCHMAKING NOVELS OF THE PAST FOR THE PEOPLE TODAY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON JANE AUSTEN’S AND PRAMOEDYA ANANTA TOER’S SELECTED NOVELS A Thesis Pr esented to The Gr aduate Pr ogr a m in English Language Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requir ements for the Degr ee of Master of Humanior a in English Language Studies by Maria Zakia Rahmawati 06 6332 010 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2010 A THESIS MARRIAGE AND MATCHMAKING NOVELS OF THE PAST FOR THE PEOPLE TODAY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON JANE AUSTEN’S AND PRAMOEDYA ANANTA TOER’S SELECTED NOVELS by Maria Zakia Rahmawati 06 6332 010 Approved by Dr.Alb. Budi Susanto, S.J. Advisor Yogyakarta, December, 2010 ii A THESIS MARRIAGE AND MATCHMAKING NOVELS OF THE PAST FOR THE PEOPLE TODAY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON JANE AUSTEN’S AND PRAMOEDYA ANANTA TOER’S SELECTED NOVELS Presented by Maria Zakia Rahmawati Student Number: 06 6332 010 Was defended in front of the Thesis Committee and declared acceptable Thesis Committee: Chairperson: Dr.Novita Dewi, M.S.,M.A (Hons) Secretary: Dr.Alb. Budi Susanto, S.J. Member: Dr.B.B. Dwijatmoko, MA Member: Dr. St. Sunardi Yogyakarta, December 2010 The Graduate School Sanata Dharma University iii STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This is to certify that all the ideas, phrases, and sentences, unless otherwise stated, are the ideas, phrases, sentences of the thesis writer. The writer understands the full consequences including degree cancellation if she took somebody else‘s ideas, phrases, or sentences without a proper reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Robert Wythers, Knight, of Pendelton Hall, Lancastershire
    Descendants: Sir Robert Wythers, Knight, of Pendelton Hall, Page 1 Lancastershire, Cheshire, England to Elizabeth Whithers (1706-1760) who married Capt. Abraman Field (1699-1774) of Culpeper, Co. Virginia 1-Sir Robert* WYTHER Kgt. b. of Pendleton Hall, Lancastershire and Halton, Cheshire, England +Joan* DE BOSTOCK b. Davenham, County Chester, par. Sir Adam DE BOSTOCK Kgt. and Unknown 2-Reginald* WYTHER b. Of Pendleton Hall, Near Clitheroe, Lancastershire, England +Isabel* WINSTANLEYE b. Winstanleye, Lancastershire, England, par. Sir Thomas WINSTANLEYE Kgt. and Unknown 3-Thomas* WYTHER b. Lancastershire, England +Ursula* COTGREAVE b. Hargreave, County Chester, England, par. Hugh* COTGREAVE Esq. and Unknown 4-Sir William* WYTHER Kgt. b. Abt 1219, d. Abt 1307 +Agnes* 5-Sir Thomas* WYTHER Kgt. d. 1329 +Agnes* 6-Thomas* WYTHER b. Of Lancashire, England +RUDBORNE* , par. Unknown and Unknown 7-Thomas* WYTHER Esq. b. Of Whalley, County Lancaster, and Vale Royall County, Chester, England +Unknown 8-Roger* WYTHER b. County Lancaster, England +Alice* MODSLEY b. Frodsham, County Chester, England, par. Thomas* MODSLEY and Unknown 9-John WYTHER +Alice SIMPKINSON b. Of Netherton, County Chester, England, par. Piers SIMPKINSON and Unknown 10-Ralphe WYTHER +Elizabeth BENNETT +Cicely WALL m. 1561, England, par. Ralph WALL and Unknown +Elizabeth WALL m. 1 January 1572, England, par. Ralph WALL and Unknown 11-John WYTHER b. of Wiltshire, England 11-Ralph WYTHER 11-Thomas WYTHER 11-George WYTHER 11-Alice WYTHER 11-Emma WYTHER 11-Margaret WYTHER 10-Robert WYTHER +Alice GARNETT b. Of Liverpool, County Lancaster, England, par. Alexander GARNETT and Unknown 10-Margaret WYTHER +WHETHALL b. Of Trafford, County Chester, England 10-Joan WYTHER Produced by Legacy on 20 April 2009 Descendants: Sir Robert Wythers, Knight, of Pendelton Hall, Page 2 Lancastershire, Cheshire, England to Elizabeth Whithers (1706-1760) who married Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of Jane Austen and Her Family Deirdre Le Faye Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03927-8 - A Chronology of Jane Austen and her Family Deirdre Le Faye Frontmatter More information A Chronology of Jane Austen and her Family For nearly forty years Deirdre Le Faye, one of the world’s leading authorities on Jane Austen, has been gathering and organising every single piece of information available about the Austen family before, during and after Jane’s lifetime. She has now collected all this material together to produce a unique chronology, containing some 15,000 entries. For the first time, those interested in Jane Austen can discover where she was and what she was doing at many precise moments of her life. The entries, many taken from hitherto unexplored and unpublished documents, are presented in a clear and readable form, and each item of information is linked to its source. The volume includes family trees for the extended Austen and Knight families from the sixteenth to the twentieth century. This is a key work of reference that every scholar and reader of Austen will find fascinating and indispensable. deirdrelefayeis a biographer and editor of Jane Austen, and is the author of Jane Austen: A Family Record (revised edition, Cambridge, 2004). © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03927-8 - A Chronology of Jane Austen and her Family Deirdre Le Faye Frontmatter More information Woolwich Greenwich Sheerness Dartford Margate Ramsgate Sittingbourne Ightham Faversham Canterbury Seal Goodnestone Westerham Maidstone Sevenoaks Deal Godmersham Tonbridge KENTWye Tunbridge Wells Ashford Dover STAFFORD- SHIRE Hamstall Ridware INSETS SCALE 0204010 30 50 km E IR 020s10 30 mile Stoneleigh H S Kenilworth N O T WARWICKSHIRE P M A Streatham H T R O N SURREY Adlestrop Great Bookham Cheltenham E Guildford IR OXF SH O Farnham R RD E S HERTFORDSHIRE T Oxford H S I E R C E U X O E B ES L E L R.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyther, Sir Robert , Knight, (Withers)
    Descendants of Robert Wythers, Knight, & Joan de Bostock of England by Eugene Field and Lucie Field December 26, 2008 Table of Contents Descendants. of. Sir. Robert. .Wyther, . Knight. .of . England. .& . Joan. .de . Bostock. 1. First. .Generation . 1. Second. .Generation . 1. Third. .Generation . 1. Fourth. .Generation . 1. Fifth. .Generation . 1. Sixth. .Generation . 2. Seventh. Generation. 2. Eighth. Generation. 2. Ninth. Generation. 2. Tenth. .Generation . 3. 11th. Generation. 4. 12th. Generation. 5. 13th. Generation. 7. 14th. Generation. 9. 15th. Generation. 11. 16th. Generation. 18. 17th. Generation. 31. 18th. Generation. 49. 19th. Generation. 71. 20th. Generation. 96. Source. Citations. 149. Name. Index. 207. Produced by: Eugene Field, Lucie Field & Miriam Field, 318 Roxanne Dr., Patterson CA 95363 Descendants of Sir Robert Wyther, Knight of England & Joan de Bostock First Generation 1. Sir Robert* WYTHER Kgt. Sir married Joan* DE BOSTOCK,1 daughter of Sir Adam DE BOSTOCK Kgt. and Unknown. The child from this marriage was: 2 M i. Reginald* WYTHER Reginald* married Isabel* WINSTANLEYE.1 Second Generation (Children) 2. Reginald* WYTHER (Sir Robert* Kgt. 1) Reginald* married Isabel* WINSTANLEYE,1 daughter of Sir Thomas WINSTANLEYE Kgt. and Unknown. The child from this marriage was: 3 M i. Thomas* WYTHER Thomas* married Ursula* COTGREAVE.1 Third Generation (Grandchildren) 3. Thomas* WYTHER (Reginald* 2, Sir Robert* Kgt. 1) Thomas* married Ursula* COTGREAVE,1 daughter of Hugh* COTGREAVE Esq. and Unknown. The child from this marriage was: 4 M i. Sir William* WYTHER Kgt.1 was born about 12192 and died about 13073 about age 88. Sir married Agnes*.4 Fourth Generation (Great-Grandchildren) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Analysis of Anglo-Saxon Shropshire A.D. 600 – 1066: with a Catalogue of Artefacts
    An Archaeological Analysis of Anglo-Saxon Shropshire A.D. 600 – 1066: With a catalogue of artefacts By Esme Nadine Hookway A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MRes Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Anglo-Saxon period spanned over 600 years, beginning in the fifth century with migrations into the Roman province of Britannia by peoples’ from the Continent, witnessing the arrival of Scandinavian raiders and settlers from the ninth century and ending with the Norman Conquest of a unified England in 1066. This was a period of immense cultural, political, economic and religious change. The archaeological evidence for this period is however sparse in comparison with the preceding Roman period and the following medieval period. This is particularly apparent in regions of western England, and our understanding of Shropshire, a county with a notable lack of Anglo-Saxon archaeological or historical evidence, remains obscure. This research aims to enhance our understanding of the Anglo-Saxon period in Shropshire by combining multiple sources of evidence, including the growing body of artefacts recorded by the Portable Antiquity Scheme, to produce an over-view of Shropshire during the Anglo-Saxon period.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Austen Article Version 1
    56 Days: The Final Chapter of Jane Austen’s Life Jane Maxwell is a Cathedral Guide at Winchester with specialist knowledge of Jane Austen, and she is also a guide at Chawton House Library. In this article she has assembled some extracts of letters and writings, both from Jane and members of her family, which together tell the story of Jane’s last days in Winchester. On 24th May 1817 Jane Austen, accompanied by her sister Cassandra, departed from Chawton Cottage, and travelled to Winchester in the carriage of eldest brother James. They took up lodgings in the home of Mrs David, at No 8 College Street, the arrangements having been made by close friend Mrs Elizabeth Heathcote and her sister Miss Alethea Bigg. This was to be Jane’s home for the last 56 days of her life. As her life drew to a close, her letters related the intimate details of her final struggle. Fig 1 Jane Austen, rear view, by Cassandra Austen reproduced by kind permission of Belinda Austen 27th May 1817, Jane to nephew James Edward Austen: “I know no better way my dearest Edward, of thanking you for your most affectionate concern for me during my illness, than by telling myself as soon as possible that I continue to get better. I will not boast of my handwriting; neither that, nor my face have yet recovered their proper beauty, but in other respects I am gaining strength very fast. I am now out of bed from 9 in the morning to 10 at night – upon the sopha t’is true, but I eat my meals with Aunt Cassandra in a rational way and can employ myself, and walk from one room to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Austen: a Family Record: Second Edition Deirdre Le Faye Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-53417-8 - Jane Austen: A Family Record: Second Edition Deirdre Le Faye Frontmatter More information JANE AUSTEN: AFAMILY RECORD This book is the outcome of years of research in Austen archives, and stems from the original family biography by W. and R. A. Austen- Leigh, Jane Austen: her Life and Letters. Jane Austen: A Family Record was first published in 1989, and this new edition incorporates information that has come to light since then, and provides new illustrations and updated family trees. Le Faye gives a detailed account of Jane’s life and literary career. She has collected together documented facts as well as the traditions concerning the novelist, and places her within the context of a widespread, affectionate and talented family group. Readers will learn how Jane transformed the stuff of her peaceful life in the Hampshire countryside into six novels that are amongst the most popular in the English language. This fascinating record of Austen and her family will be of great interest to general readers and scholars alike. Deirdre Le Faye has been actively researching the life and times of Jane Austen and her family for the last thirty years. In 1995 she pre- pared a completely new edition of Jane Austen’s Letters. She has also written several other books: a short illustrated biography, Jane Austen (1998), Jane Austen’s ‘Outlandish Cousin’, the Life and Letters of Eliza de Feuillide (2002) and Jane Austen: The World of Her Novels (2002)as well as numerous articles in literary journals. © in this
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. George Austen, a Second Generation Anglican Clergyman, and Cassandra Leigh, Whose Father Was Also an Anglican Clergyman
    JANE AUSTEN AND HER FAMILY Jane Austen was born on December 16, 1775 in Steventon, Hampshire. Parents: Rev. George Austen, a second generation Anglican clergyman, and Cassandra Leigh, whose father was also an Anglican clergyman. Family of 8: James (1765) - became an Anglican clergyman; second wife was Jane's good friend, Mary Lloyd; Had 3 children. After his father's retirement, took over the parishes of Dean and Steventon. George (1766) - was handicapped (mentally deficient? deaf and dumb? epileptic?) Never lived with the family. Never married. Edward (1767) - as a young teen, was adopted by a wealthy cousin, lived at Godmersham, Kent, a noted property in England, and took the name Knight. Married the well-to-do Elizabeth Bridges who was not too fond of Jane. Had 11 children. Henry (1771) - was a soldier in the militia, a businessman, a banker and a clergyman. Married his cousin, Eliza de Feuillide, who was 10 years his senior. No children. Cassandra (1773) Francis (1774) - eventually became Sir Francis, Admiral of the Fleet; Had 11 children. Second wife was Jane's good friend, Martha Lloyd. Jane (1775) Charles (1779) - eventually commanded ships in the British Navy. Had 8 chidren. *AII married brothers except Edward married twice. 1783: Jane and Cassandra are sent for tutoring to a woman in Oxford and, after a few months, moved with this tutor to Southampton. A short time later, Jane became very ill, probably with typhus, which had been carried to England by troops returning from Gibraltar and the war with the French. Jane was taken home by her parents and very nearly died.
    [Show full text]