DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Utah Project Bonneville Unit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Utah Project Bonneville Unit Central Utah Project Bonneville Unit Project Location............................................................................................................................ 3 Historical Setting........................................................................................................................... 3 Project Authorization ................................................................................................................. 12 Construction History .................................................................................................................. 23 Starvation Complex .................................................................................................................. 24 Starvation Dam ..................................................................................................................... 24 Knight Diversion Dam.......................................................................................................... 25 Starvation Feeder Conduit .................................................................................................... 26 Bottle Hollow............................................................................................................................ 27 Strawberry Aqueduct and Collection System........................................................................... 28 Water Hollow Tunnel – Channel Number 2............................................................................. 28 Soldier Creek Dam.................................................................................................................... 30 Layout and Currant Tunnels ..................................................................................................... 33 Jordan Aqueduct Reach I and II................................................................................................ 35 Currant Creek Dam................................................................................................................... 39 Vat Tunnel ................................................................................................................................ 42 Stillwater Tunnel....................................................................................................................... 45 “Hit List”................................................................................................................................... 48 West Fork Pipeline- Vat Diversion Dam and 404 permits ....................................................... 49 Hades and Rhodes Tunnels....................................................................................................... 51 Supplemental Repayment Contract Jordan Aqueduct-Reach III and IV-TPA Lawsuit .......... 52 Upper Stillwater Dam ............................................................................................................... 56 North Fork Siphon .................................................................................................................... 58 Doc’s, Hades, Win, and Rhodes Diversions and Feeder Pipelines........................................... 59 Jordanelle Dam ......................................................................................................................... 60 Diamond Fork Power System – Syar Tunnel and Sixth Water Flow Control Structure ......... 70 CUP Completion Act ................................................................................................................ 73 Post Construction History.......................................................................................................... 79 Bonneville Irrigation and Drainage System – Utah Lake System ............................................ 79 Diamond Fork System .............................................................................................................. 81 Settlement of Project Lands....................................................................................................... 86 Uses of Project Water ................................................................................................................. 87 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 88 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................ 96 Index........................................................................................................................................... 101 The Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit Historic Reclamation Projects Book Adam R. Eastman Page 1 The Central Utah Project (CUP) is a massive and complicated water development project. It is the largest in the State of Utah. The ultimate plans for the CUP were among the largest and most complex contemplated by the Bureau of Reclamation. To make the project more manageable, Reclamation broke the initial phase of the CUP into four independent projects which could be united by the ultimate phase. Of the four units authorized by Congress as the initial phase, the largest and most complex is the Bonneville Unit, which itself is broken into interconnected parts. Reclamation’s plans called for ten new reservoirs; enlargement of two existing reservoirs; 140 miles of aqueducts, tunnels, and canals; three power plants; nine pumping stations; and 200 miles of pipe drains. Because of its size and complexity, it is the Bonneville Unit that people most frequently associate with the CUP, sometimes to the exclusion of the Vernal and Jensen Units, which have been constructed to benefit communities in the Uinta Basin.1 The history of the CUP is as large and complex as the project itself. And as with the project, the popular notion is that the history of the Bonneville Unit is the history of the CUP. There is some validity in this assumption. Certainly the history of the other units of the CUP, particularly those that were not built, includes colorful stories of the struggles to push forward a vision—engineering challenges, political intrigue, battles with opponents, courtroom drama, and the like. But the history of the CUP is filled with all of these. The history of the CUP is a microcosm of the large history of the battles over the Colorado River, wrapped with a thick layer of its own unique history. The Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit Historic Reclamation Projects Book Adam R. Eastman Page 2 Project Location Because of its size and complexity, Reclamation divided the planning for the CUP into six units. The Bonneville Unit is the largest and most complex of the six. Reclamation designed the unit to provide irrigation water for the Uinta Basin and to collect, store, and divert water from the Uinta Basin into the Bonneville Basin. The areas served by the Bonneville Unit included lands within eleven counties in central and eastern Utah—Duchesne, Garfield, Juab, Millard, Piute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Summit, Utah, and Wasatch Counties. The project proposed the development of water in the Colorado, Bonneville, and Sevier River Basins. The Bonneville Unit essentially proposed enlarging Reclamation’s Strawberry Valley Project by developing additional water supplies in the Colorado River Basin on the Duchesne River and its major tributaries; Strawberry River, Currant Creek and Rock Creek. The original Strawberry Reservoir would be enlarged. A new diversion tunnel would convey Strawberry water into the Spanish Fork River drainage in the Bonneville Basin. A series of dams, tunnels and pipelines on Diamond Fork Creek, a tributary of the Spanish Fork River, would regulate the flows and would provide hydropower generation. Water delivered into the Bonneville Basin would be used for irrigation in Utah, Juab, Millard and Sevier Counties, and by exchange in Garfield, Piute, Sanpete, and Salt Lake Counties. Additional water supplies would be developed by the construction of dikes across two shallow bays on Utah Lake. Pumping would convey part of the water to project lands on the southwestern shores of the lake. The balance of the water saved by diking would be stored upstream on the Provo River at a dam above Heber City. This water would be used as a municipal supply for northern Utah and Salt Lake Counties. Historical Setting The Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit Historic Reclamation Projects Book Adam R. Eastman Page 3 Ages ago an inland sea teeming with aquatic life covered most of what is now the Uinta Basin. Dinosaurs prowled the tropical swamps. Today, the one-time abode of the dinosaurs has been set aside by the Federal government as the Dinosaur National Monument where paleontologists pick away to free rock-embedded bones. Additionally, rich deposits of coal, gas, oil, and oil shale are found in the area. In successive geologic periods, the collision of land masses resulted in massive uplifts creating the Wasatch and Uintah Mountain Ranges. In more recent geologic time, the regional uplift of much of the western North American continent raised Utah to its present elevation, on average about one mile above sea level. Steepened river gradients greatly accelerated erosion, and several rivers still sculpt the great canyons of the Colorado Plateau. The different rates of movement between the tectonic plates separated by the Wasatch Mountains formed the terminal basins and mountain ranges of the Great Basin. Because these basins have no outlet to the sea, intermittent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Young Skaters Compete for Berth at Nationals
    Mobile Contact Us Advertise e-Edition Email Updates Subscriber Services Join the conversation Log In Register Subscribe Advanced Search | Privacy | About Our Ads 27° sponsored by News Clear Weekly Forecast Web Searc h powered by Y A H O O ! SE A RC H News Cities Sports Opinion Obituaries Life & Style Entertainment Get It! Classifieds Deals Homes Jobs Home / Utah Valley Sports / Other FIGURE SKATING Young skaters compete for berth at Nationals Recommend 0 0 0 Print Email 22 hours ago • Dorothy Knoell - Daily Herald (0) Comments Call it the battle of the mighty mites. Follow the Daily Herald Monday evening at the Peaks Ice Arena, two young men, one just into his teenage years, the other still almost a year away from turning 13, waged a grown-up battle on the ice, throwing out triple Lutzes, triple flips, triple-triples and three-jump combinations with poise beyond their years and talent to spare. Cher Swears Off Macy's When the ice chips settled, it was 12-year-old Vincent Zhou of the All Year Figure Skating Club in Due to Donald Tr… Ontario, Calif., who edged defending U.S. junior champion Nathan Chen of Salt Lake City (SLFS) for the junior men’s title at the Pacific Coast Sectional competition. Of course, both skaters – along with Nix Phengsy of All Year and Shotaro Omori of the Los Angeles FSC – advanced to the U.S. Nationals, where Chen will get another shot at Zhou as he attempts to defend his junior national title. Skaters from five different classifications are vying for berths to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratigraphic Importance of the Brontothere (Cf. Diplacodon Elatus) in the Brennan Basin Member of the Duchesne River Formation of Utah
    Foss. Rec., 17, 69–74, 2014 www.foss-rec.net/17/69/2014/ doi:10.5194/fr-17-69-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The stratigraphic importance of the brontothere (cf. Diplacodon elatus) in the Brennan Basin Member of the Duchesne River Formation of Utah B. J. Burger and L. Tackett II Department of Geology, Utah State University, Uintah Basin Regional Campus 320 North Aggie Blvd. Vernal, UT 84078, USA Correspondence to: B. J. Burger ([email protected]) Received: 10 June 2014 – Revised: 6 August 2014 – Accepted: 12 August 2014 – Published: 27 August 2014 Abstract. We report on the first occurrence of an early southern Mississippia (Gazin and Sullivan, 1942), and the horned brontothere in the Brennan Basin Member of the Pacific Northwest (Mihlbacher, 2007). But nowhere is the Duchesne River Formation in northeastern Utah. This is the record of brontotheres as diverse as the fossil record ob- first record of a brontothere from the Brennan Basin Member. tained from the middle Eocene depositional basins located in Previously, brontotheres have been reported from the higher northeastern Utah, southwestern Wyoming and northwestern stratigraphic La Point Member (Duchesneodus uintensis) Colorado (Lull, 1905; Cook, 1926; Douglass, 1909; Gregory, and the lower stratigraphic Uinta Formation (Sphenocoelus 1912; Gunnell and Yarborough, 2000; Hatcher, 1895; Lucas uintensis, Fossendorhinus diploconus, Metarhinus fluviatilis, et al., 2004; Lucas and Holbrook, 2004; Lucas and Schoch, Metarhinus abbotti, Sthenodectes incisivum, Metatelmath- 1982; Mader, 2000, 2009a, b, Mihlbacher, 2008, 2011; Os- erium ultimum, Protitanotherium emarginatum, Pollyosbor- born, 1889, 1895, 1908, 1913, 1929; Peterson, 1914a, b, nia altidens, Diplacodon elatus).
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2 UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 355 South 400 East • Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • 801-531-1150 • www.ucrcommission.com June 1, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Biden: The Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission, as required by Article VIII(d)(13) of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 (“Compact”), is enclosed. The report also has been transmitted to the Governors of each state signatory to the Compact, which include Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona. The budget of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2021 (July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021) is included in this report as Appendix B. Respectfully yours, Amy I. Haas Executive Director and Secretary Enclosure 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................. 8 COMMISSIONERS .................................................................................... 9 ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS ........................................................... 10 OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION ....................................................... 10 COMMISSION STAFF ............................................................................. 10 COMMITTEES ......................................................................................... 11 LEGAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Hampshire High Tunnel Story
    The New Hampshire High Tunnel Story NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE New Hampshire January 2011 BACKGROUND National High Tunnel Conservation Benefits Local Foods Initiatives 3-Year Pilot Program High tunnels can provide a number of Growing food locally, especially before significant conservation benefits such as and after the traditional growing season, NRCS offered seasonal high tunnels an increase in plant and soil quality, a helps strengthen the local economy and (officially called “seasonal high tunnel decrease in pesticide use and foliar (leaf) helps ensure the viability and profitability system for crops”) as a conservation disease, and improved energy savings. of small farms. When NH farms succeed, practice for the first time in fiscal year Many farmers who want to grow toma- valuable farmland and cultural heritage are (FY) 2010 as part of a three-year trial to toes without using pesticides often find protected. High tunnels are important tools determine their effectiveness in con- they can only do so successfully if they for enhancing the availability of local food serving water, improving soil health, are grown in a tunnel. Without rainfall, year-round. foliar disease is often reduced because the leaves stay dry. Insects that are com- “As expected, the seasonal high monly a problem in the field may not be “It is phenomenal that winter tunnel pilot has been popular in so in the tunnel because the tunnel tends farmer’s markets in NH have grown New Hampshire. In just one to disrupt their feeding patterns. Other from none four years ago to twenty year, the NRCS-NH helped fund insects that occur in a high tunnel are today.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security Daily Open Source Infrastructure
    Daily Open Source Infrastructure Report 2 April 2012 Top Stories • An audit revealed that more than $7 million in taxpayer-purchased fuels for Los Angeles city vehicles has gone unaccounted for in recent years. – Los Angeles Times (See item 2) • Global Payments Inc, an Atlanta-based payments processor, was broken into by hackers, leaving more than 50,000 Visa and MasterCard accounts potentially compromised, according to news reports March 30. – Wired (See item 11) • Colorado authorities investigated problems with an emergency notification system March 30 because some residents who signed up never got a warning about a dangerous wildfire. Two people were killed in the fire and more than 900 homes were evacuated. – Associated Press (See item 40) • Scrap metal thieves targeting fiber optic cables shut down 9-1-1 service in Ohio’s Appalachian region and left thousands of residents, banks, and other businesses without telephone and Internet services. – Associated Press (See item 48) Fast Jump Menu PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES SERVICE INDUSTRIES • Energy • Banking and Finance • Chemical • Transportation • Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Waste • Postal and Shipping • Critical Manufacturing • Information Technology • Defense Industrial Base • Communications • Dams • Commercial Facilities SUSTENANCE and HEALTH FEDERAL and STATE • Agriculture and Food • Government Facilities • Water • Emergency Services • Public Health and Healthcare • National Monuments and Icons - 1 - Energy Sector Current Electricity Sector Threat Alert Levels: Physical: LOW, Cyber: LOW Scale: LOW, GUARDED, ELEVATED, HIGH, SEVERE [Source: ISAC for the Electricity Sector (ES-ISAC) - [http://www.esisac.com] 1. March 30, Scranton Times-Tribune – (Pennsylvania) Explosion rocks natural gas compressor station. An explosion at a natural gas compressor station in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, March 29, blew a hole in the roof of the complex holding the engines, shaking homes as far as a half-mile away and drawing emergency responders from nearby counties.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Use for Ellipsis Points
    Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 10 4-2-1993 A New Use for Ellipsis Points... Larry G. Childs Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Childs, Larry G. (1993) "A New Use for Ellipsis Points...," Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls/vol19/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A New Use for Ellipsis Points ... Larry G. Childs Introduction THE DAILY HERALD Within the last seventy years or so, the three CLASSIFIEDS.•• dots commonly known as ellipsis points, or simply, A CIRCUS OF VALUES ellipses, have taken on a new use. Although prob­ • Newspaper headline about child skiers (The ably the most common usage of ellipses today, this Daily Herald, 21 February 1993, p. E1): new use is completely ignored by almost all En­ These kids race for cookies ••• glish style books. This paper examines the new us­ age in order to document a nearly undocumented • Every section of the USA Today newspaper has change to our living English language. a "Today's Tip-off" feature containing headlines If you open any newspaper or magazine, or read with ellipses. Here are some examples from the any sort of advertising blurb, you are almost guar­ 8 December 1992 edition: anteed to find ellipsis points used as a "device to Northwest Airlines is •.• extending the catch and hold the reader's interest," to quote the travel period for winter fare discounts Style Manual in the College Edition of the Ameri­ You can speak to your ATM .•• with a can Heritage Dictionary (1982, 60).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Development by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Utah
    DEVELOPMENT W&M U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TC SOU TH PACIFIC DIVI SI O N 423 • A15 1977 Utah 1977 M ■ - z//>A ;^7 /WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ec by THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS in UTAH JANUARY 1977 ADDRESS INQUIRIES TO DIVISION ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer Division South Pacific Corps of Engineers 630 Sansome Street San Fransisco, California 94111 DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer District U.S. Army Engineer District Los Angeles Corps of Engineers Sacramento Federal Building Corps of Engineers 300 North Los Angeles Street Federal and Courts Building Los Angeles, California 90012 (P.O. Box 2711 650 Capitol Mall Los Angeles, California 90053) Sacramento, California 95814 TO OUR READERS: Throughout history, water has played a dominant role in shaping the destinies of nations and entire civilizations. The early settlement and development of our country occurred along our coasts and water courses. The management of our land and water resources was the catalyst which enabled us to progress from a basically rural and agrarian economy to the urban and industrialized nation we are today. Since the General Survey Act of 1824, the US Army Corps of Engineers has played a vital role in the development and management of our national water resources. At the direction of Presidents and with Congressional authorization and funding, the Corps of Engineers has planned and executed major national programs for navigation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, recreation and water conservation which have been responsive to the changing needs and demands of the American people for 152 years.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET: BART Silicon Valley
    Twin-Bore Single-Bore Running Tunnel Running Tunnel Utilities Utilities Up to ~60' FACT SHEET: VTA’s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project FACTTunneling MethodologySHEET: BART Silicon Valley VTA’sVTA’s BART BART Silicon Silicon Valley Phase Valley II Project Phase is a six-mile, ll Extension four-stationUp extensionProject to ~75' that will bring BART train service from Berryessa/North San José through downtown San José to the City of Santa Clara. The Phase II Project will include an approximately five-mile tunnel, two mid-tunnel ventilation facilities, a maintenance facility and storage yard, three VTA’sunderground BART Siliconstations (AlumValley Rock/28th Program Street, Overview Downtown San José, Diridon), and one ground-level station (Santa VTAClara). is extending The subway the tunnelBART regionalwill be in heavy one large rail system diameter to Milpitas,tunnel. San Jose, and Santa Clara. The 16-mile extension, called the BART Silicon Valley Program, will extend the BART system south of BART’s future Warm Springs/SouthSingle-Bore Fremont Tunnel Station in Fremont to Milpitas, San Jose, and Santa Clara. When completed, this fully grade-separatedThe tunnel will be project constructed is planned as a tosingle, include large six diameter stations andtunnel. a new The maintenance and storage facility in Santa Clara.approximately VTA’s BART 45 footSilicon tunnel Valley will Program contain istwo being independent delivered trackways,in two phases. one Thefor Berryessa Extension Project (Phaseeach direction I) is under of constructiontravel. Passenger and scheduled platforms willto open be located in 2018, within with thestations tunnel, in Milpitas and the Berryessa areaconnected of San toJose.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Duchesne From: Utah Place Names
    Fort Duchesne from: Utah Place Names FORT DUCHESNE* (Uintah County) was near the Uinta River, one mile south of US-40. The site was originally a fur-trading post prior to 1841. In August 1861, the fort was established under the Lincoln presidency. On August 20, 1886, two troops of black men from the Ninth Cavalry, under Major F. W. Benteen, moved in. They served at the fort for twelve years. Because of their dark curly hair, the Indians called the troops buffalo soldiers. The fort was abandoned in 1912, then re-established as the headquarters for the Uintah Reservation. See Duchesne River below for name source. >S23,T2S,R1E,USM; 4,988' (1,520m). Bibliography: Our Pioneer Heritage, 17 vols. Daughters of the Utah Pioneers. (v17). Deseret News. Salt Lake City: Deseret News Publishing Company. (6 Oct. 1934). Greer, Deon C., et al. Atlas of Utah. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1981. Personal place name manuscript records. Stegner, Wallace. Beyond the Hundredth Meridian. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954. Utah Historical Quarterly. Salt Lake City: Utah State Historical Society. (v2,no.1). Utah State Historical Society. Unpublished Archives on Geographic Names. DUCHESNE RIVER (Duchesne County, Uintah County) originates at the southwestern section of the Uinta Mountains at the foot of Mount Agassiz. The river drains south southeast through Duchesne* into the Green River. Prior to 1875 the present Duchesne River was known as the Uinta River. As one of the more historic and prominent rivers of Utah, there has been much confusion in past writings as to the river's name history and relative relationships with the mouths of the nearby White and Uinta rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    September 10-12, 2008 Gas prices Utah League of Cities and Towns Debt Inflation 101st Annual Convention Insurance Cost of food What’s Asphalt Up, Housing prices Sales tax revenue What’s Down Residential construction Making Life Better At our 100th Annual Convention last September, we unveiled our “Making Life Better Campaign.” One year later, many cities and towns around the state are using it to communicate the services and events that are provided for their residents. Around the hotel you’ll see a number of banners and signs that highlight what communities around the state are doing to make life better. Check our website, ulct.org, for more information about the campaign. THANKS TO OUR CONFERENCE SPONSORS Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Cate Equipment Company Comcast Energy Solutions Gold Cross Ambulance Intermountain Healthcare Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham, Inc. Maverick Questar Rio Tinto Rocky Mountain Power UAMPS Union Pacific Utah Local Governments Trust Zions Bank Zions Bank Public Finance Wal-Mart Waste Management of Utah General Table Information of CONTENTS Introduction . 2 All events and sessions will be held at the Sheraton City Centre with the exception President’s Message . 3 of Wednesday night’s event which will be held at The Gateway. Entertainment . 4 Please turn cell phones and audible pagers off during all meetings, workshops, general sessions, luncheons, etc. Speaker Highlights ................................................ 6 Business Session Agenda ......................................... 10 Parking: Parking at the Sheraton City Centre is free for all ULCT conference attendees and vendors. 2008 Essay Contest Winners . 11 Activities at a Glance ............................................. 12 Registration Desk Hours Sheraton City Centre Map ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, and RELATED AGENCIES (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
    Appendix C CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES (dollar amounts in thousands) 2022 State Project Request U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AK Office of Law Enforcement, Resident Agent in Charge Rehabilitate office and replace fuel storage tank .................................................................................. 350 AZ Alchesay National Fish Hatchery Replace effluent treatment system .......................................................................................................... 1,012 Replace tank house .................................................................................................................................... 1,400 CA Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Rehabilitate South Bay flood protection levee, phase 4 ....................................................................... 1,200 MT Northwest Montana National Wildlife Refuge Complex Replace infrastructure to support field stations currently supported at the National Bison Range ..................................................................................................................... 11,533 NY Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Replace headquarters and visitor center; co-locate with Ecological Services office ........................ 3,160 WA Makah National Fish Hatchery Replace diversion dam and fish barrier, phase 2 .................................................................................. 2,521 WI Iron River National Fish Hatchery Demolish dilapidated milking barn .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]