Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 2 of 142 Report No. UT‐17.XX PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) Prepared for: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted by: University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center Authored by: Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing Final Report June 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 3 of 142 DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research through the Utah Transportation Research Advisory Council (UTRAC). We also acknowledge the following individuals from UDOT for helping manage this research: Jeff Harris Eric Rasband Brent Schvanaveldt Jordan Backman Gracious thanks to our paid peer reviewers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University: Dr. Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE. Dr. Mitsuru Saito, Ph.D, P.E., F. ASCE, F. ITE While not authors, the efforts of the following people helped make this report possible. Data Collection Proof Reading/Edits Ethan Clark Ray Debbie Weaver Thomas Cushing Clint Simkins Jack Egan Debolina Banerjee Katherine A. Daly Katherine A. Daly ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 4 of 142 Technical Report Documentation Page (Form DOT 1700.7) 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipients Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Effects of Bus Rapid Transit on Traffic in a Travel Corridor: Provo/Orem BRT: 2017‐06‐13 5:00:00 PM Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report. 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 375 S. 1530 E. Room 235 AAC Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Utah Department of Transportation, Research Division Peer Reviewed Report; Final 4501 South 2700 West, PO Box 148410 Report; 2015 Salt Lake City, UT 84114‐1265 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes This project was funded by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), the Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake County (SLCo), the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC), and the Mountainland Association of Governments (MAG). 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report presents the initial conditions for the Provo‐Orem Transportation Improvement Project (TRIP). TRIP consists of a number of transportation improvements, including the construction of new Bus Rapid Transit. Traffic counts of Average Annual Daily Traffic were obtained for the project alignment and identified diversion corridors. Data on the ridership of all bus lines and rail lines within the study area was collected. To make it possible to establish trend lines for growth in traffic and in transit ridership, data from at least five years prior to BRT construction was collected for both AADT and transit ridership. To control for changes in traffic, it was necessary to control for traffic generation within the study area. County tax assessor data was used to determine initial levels of development within the study area, and these data were checked against aerial photo imagery. Each parcel in the assessor database was matched with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual code it best resembles. Using the associated trip rate, trips generated for each parcel were estimated. The trips from all parcels in the study area were summed to estimate the total number of trips generated within the study area. For Brigham Young University and Utah Valley University, data on student enrollment and faculty and staffing levels were gathered to establish a baseline for travel demand. 17. Key Words 18.Availability Statement Metropolitan Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84102 Bus Rapid Transit, Safety, Phone: 801.587.9483 < http://plan.cap.utah.edu/research/metropolitan‐ Environmental Quality, research‐center>. Capacity, Congestion 19. Security Class (this report) 20. SecurityClass(thispage) 22. Price 21. No. of Pages Unclassified Unclassified 142 NA ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 5 of 142 Table of Contents 2 PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) ....................... 2 Technical Report Documentation Page .......................................................................................... 4 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 5 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 9 Acronyms & Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 12 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 14 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.1 Study Overview .............................................................................................................. 16 1.2 Report Objectives ........................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Previous Research .......................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Report Structure ............................................................................................................. 17 1.4.1 Report Structure Outline ............................................................................................ 18 2 Project Context ...................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Urban Context ................................................................................................................ 19 2.2 Transportation Context .................................................................................................. 19 3 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Running Ways ................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 Stations & Stops ............................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Vehicles .......................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Fare Collection ................................................................................................................ 22 3.5 Intelligent Transportation Systems ................................................................................ 22 3.6 Service and Operations Plans ......................................................................................... 24 3.7 Roadway Improvements ................................................................................................ 24 3.8 Active Transportation Improvements ............................................................................ 25 4 System Costs .......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1 Project Costs ................................................................................................................... 26 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 6 of 142 4.2 Project Funding .............................................................................................................. 27 5 Planning, Design & Implementation ...................................................................................... 28 5.1 Institutional Context ....................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Project Development History ......................................................................................... 28 5.3 Project Design & Implementation .................................................................................. 30 5.4 Station & Guideway Planning ......................................................................................... 31 5.4.1 Station Changes
Recommended publications
  • Young Skaters Compete for Berth at Nationals
    Mobile Contact Us Advertise e-Edition Email Updates Subscriber Services Join the conversation Log In Register Subscribe Advanced Search | Privacy | About Our Ads 27° sponsored by News Clear Weekly Forecast Web Searc h powered by Y A H O O ! SE A RC H News Cities Sports Opinion Obituaries Life & Style Entertainment Get It! Classifieds Deals Homes Jobs Home / Utah Valley Sports / Other FIGURE SKATING Young skaters compete for berth at Nationals Recommend 0 0 0 Print Email 22 hours ago • Dorothy Knoell - Daily Herald (0) Comments Call it the battle of the mighty mites. Follow the Daily Herald Monday evening at the Peaks Ice Arena, two young men, one just into his teenage years, the other still almost a year away from turning 13, waged a grown-up battle on the ice, throwing out triple Lutzes, triple flips, triple-triples and three-jump combinations with poise beyond their years and talent to spare. Cher Swears Off Macy's When the ice chips settled, it was 12-year-old Vincent Zhou of the All Year Figure Skating Club in Due to Donald Tr… Ontario, Calif., who edged defending U.S. junior champion Nathan Chen of Salt Lake City (SLFS) for the junior men’s title at the Pacific Coast Sectional competition. Of course, both skaters – along with Nix Phengsy of All Year and Shotaro Omori of the Los Angeles FSC – advanced to the U.S. Nationals, where Chen will get another shot at Zhou as he attempts to defend his junior national title. Skaters from five different classifications are vying for berths to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
    APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridesharing with Zimride at the University of Utah
    LOST IN THE CROWD? RIDESHARING WITH ZIMRIDE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH An assessment prepared by Sean Bridegam, Jen Colby, Sach Combs, Majid Heidarifar, and Evan Kipnis for SUST 6000—Global Changes and Society May 2017 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Global Changes and Society course was to “develop an interdisciplinary perspective to explore the complex systems of environmental change and the links to society through a project- based approach” (University of Utah General Catalog). The focus for this year’s course was to air quality and global air quality issues. As transportation makes up more than half of pollutant source during winter time inversions in the Salt Lake Valley this project focused on non-single occupancy vehicle (SOV) options available to commuters. This assessment evaluated carpooling and specifically Zimride, a ride matching platform. The authors set out with the objective to complete a comprehensive assessment of the Zimride program at the University of Utah at the midpoint of a 3-year contract period. This evolved into a set of observations, evidence, and recommendations regarding alternative transportation more broadly. Our team essentially served as a consulting group for the primary campus program coordinator for Zimride, who provided us with a set of research questions and hypotheses to investigate. Based on the research findings detailed in this report, we can provide a set of recommendations to help increase the effectiveness of the program in the remaining contract period. Support and success of alternative transportation programs have been variable and may lag behind those of many peer institutions based on a review of STARS data.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security Daily Open Source Infrastructure
    Daily Open Source Infrastructure Report 2 April 2012 Top Stories • An audit revealed that more than $7 million in taxpayer-purchased fuels for Los Angeles city vehicles has gone unaccounted for in recent years. – Los Angeles Times (See item 2) • Global Payments Inc, an Atlanta-based payments processor, was broken into by hackers, leaving more than 50,000 Visa and MasterCard accounts potentially compromised, according to news reports March 30. – Wired (See item 11) • Colorado authorities investigated problems with an emergency notification system March 30 because some residents who signed up never got a warning about a dangerous wildfire. Two people were killed in the fire and more than 900 homes were evacuated. – Associated Press (See item 40) • Scrap metal thieves targeting fiber optic cables shut down 9-1-1 service in Ohio’s Appalachian region and left thousands of residents, banks, and other businesses without telephone and Internet services. – Associated Press (See item 48) Fast Jump Menu PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES SERVICE INDUSTRIES • Energy • Banking and Finance • Chemical • Transportation • Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Waste • Postal and Shipping • Critical Manufacturing • Information Technology • Defense Industrial Base • Communications • Dams • Commercial Facilities SUSTENANCE and HEALTH FEDERAL and STATE • Agriculture and Food • Government Facilities • Water • Emergency Services • Public Health and Healthcare • National Monuments and Icons - 1 - Energy Sector Current Electricity Sector Threat Alert Levels: Physical: LOW, Cyber: LOW Scale: LOW, GUARDED, ELEVATED, HIGH, SEVERE [Source: ISAC for the Electricity Sector (ES-ISAC) - [http://www.esisac.com] 1. March 30, Scranton Times-Tribune – (Pennsylvania) Explosion rocks natural gas compressor station. An explosion at a natural gas compressor station in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, March 29, blew a hole in the roof of the complex holding the engines, shaking homes as far as a half-mile away and drawing emergency responders from nearby counties.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Use for Ellipsis Points
    Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 10 4-2-1993 A New Use for Ellipsis Points... Larry G. Childs Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Childs, Larry G. (1993) "A New Use for Ellipsis Points...," Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls/vol19/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A New Use for Ellipsis Points ... Larry G. Childs Introduction THE DAILY HERALD Within the last seventy years or so, the three CLASSIFIEDS.•• dots commonly known as ellipsis points, or simply, A CIRCUS OF VALUES ellipses, have taken on a new use. Although prob­ • Newspaper headline about child skiers (The ably the most common usage of ellipses today, this Daily Herald, 21 February 1993, p. E1): new use is completely ignored by almost all En­ These kids race for cookies ••• glish style books. This paper examines the new us­ age in order to document a nearly undocumented • Every section of the USA Today newspaper has change to our living English language. a "Today's Tip-off" feature containing headlines If you open any newspaper or magazine, or read with ellipses. Here are some examples from the any sort of advertising blurb, you are almost guar­ 8 December 1992 edition: anteed to find ellipsis points used as a "device to Northwest Airlines is •.• extending the catch and hold the reader's interest," to quote the travel period for winter fare discounts Style Manual in the College Edition of the Ameri­ You can speak to your ATM .•• with a can Heritage Dictionary (1982, 60).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Royal Skousen
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Fundamental Scholarly Discoveries and Academic Accomplishments listed in an addendum first placed online in 2014 plus an additional statement regarding the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project from November 2014 through December 2018 13 May 2020 O in 2017-2020 in progress Royal Skousen Professor of Linguistics and English Language 4037 JFSB Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 [email protected] 801-422-3482 (office, with phone mail) 801-422-0906 (fax) personal born 5 August 1945 in Cleveland, Ohio married to Sirkku Unelma Härkönen, 24 June 1968 7 children 2 education 1963 graduated from Sunset High School, Beaverton, Oregon 1969 BA (major in English, minor in mathematics), Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1971 MA (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972 PhD (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois teaching positions 1970-1972 instructor of the introductory and advanced graduate courses in mathematical linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972-1979 assistant professor of linguistics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1979-1981 assistant professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1981-1986 associate professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1986-2001 professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah O 2001-2018 professor of linguistics and English language, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 2007-2010 associate chair,
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually
    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 annually Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connection, improve public health and enhance quality of life. • Central Corridor improvements: Expansion of the Utah Valley Express (UVX) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line to Salt Lake City; addition of a Davis County to Salt Lake City BRT line; construction of a BRT line in Ogden; and the pursuit of world class transit-oriented developments at the Point of the Mountain during the repurposing of 600 acres of the Utah State Prison after its future relocation. To learn more go to: rideuta.com VISION Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. THE POSITION The Director of Capital Development plays a critical ABOUT UTA role in getting things done at Utah Transit Authority UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from (UTA). This is a senior-level position reporting to the Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Chief Service Development Officer and is responsible Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a for cultivating projects that improve the connectivity, public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided frequency, reliability, and quality of UTA’s transit residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the offerings. This person oversees and manages corridor form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded and facility projects through environmental analysis, its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit grant funding, and design processes, then consults with service, and carpool and vanpool programs.
    [Show full text]
  • HOBBLE CREEK COMPANY • Decks & Patios • Bath Grab Bars • Homes • Garage Entry • Wheelchair Ramps • Summer Cleanup • Mowing • Commercial Bldgs
    DAILY HERALD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 | B8 21 days after service of this Sum- The State of Utah to the said defen- mons upon you. Service is deemed dant: You are hereby summoned in the Rental Real Estate completed 21 days after the first above entitled action which is brought publication of this Summons for the purpose of making a general Commercial If you fail so to do, judgment by default determination of the water rights of the will be taken against you for the relief described water source. Upon the ser- Property demanded in said Complaint, which is vice of this summons upon you, you on file filed with the Clerk of said will thereafter be subject to the jurisdic- BUSINESS PARTNER WANTED Court. You can obtain a copy of the tion of the entitled court and, if you Seeking Small Business to Complaint from the above-mentioned have or intend to claim a water right, it Partner For U-haul Franchise. Court. shall be your duty to follow further Jesse: [email protected] proceedings in the above entitled ac- Dated this 1st day of September, tion and to defend and protect your Garage/Yard Sales 2020 water rights therein. If you have not s/Carl E. Kingston Carl E. Kingston been served with summons other than Attorney for Plaintiff by publication in a newspaper and you Garage Sales Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining’s 51-6742 (a21499): Guilford A and claim a water right within the area of HAVING A GARAGE SALE? Legal Notices website at Connie L Rand is/are filing an exten- Legal Notice Published in Daily-Herald the Provo City North Subdivision http://ogm.utah.gov/amr/boardtemp/re Place a classified ad in The Daily NOTICE OF HEARING sion for 3.18 ac-ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation
    Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Denver Airports District Office DRAFT SECTION 303(c)/4(f) DE MINIMIS FINDING For the Provo Municipal Airport City of Provo, Utah County, Utah I. Introduction - Section 4(f) Section 4(f) was initially codified in Title 49 United States Code (USC) § 1653(f) (Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966). In 1983, § 1653(f) was reworded and recodified as Title 49 USC § 303 but is still commonly referred to as Section 4(f). Congress amended Section 4(f) in 2005 when the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was enacted. Section 4(f) declares that “it is the policy of the US Government that special effort should be made to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside and public park and recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites.” In addition: Section 4(f) prohibits the use of land of significant publicly owned public parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and land of a historic site for transportation projects unless the Administration determines that there is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative and that all possible planning to minimize harm has occurred. De minimis impacts related to historic sites are defined as the determination of either “no adverse effect” or “no historic properties affected” in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. For publicly owned parks, recreation areas, and wildlife/waterfowl refuges, de minimis impacts are defined as those that do not “adversely affect the activities, features, and attributes” of the Section 4(f) resource.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I: Chapters 1–5
    PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I: Chapters 1–5 April 2015 UTAH RECLAMATION 230 South 500 East, #230, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 COMMISSIONERS Phone: (801) 524-3146 – Fax: (801) 524-3148 Don A. Christiansen MITIGATION Brad T. Barber AND CONSERVATION Dallin W. Jensen COMMISSION Dear Reader, April 2015 Attached is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Provo River Delta Restoration Project (PRDRP). The proposed project would restore a naturally functioning river- lake interface essential for recruitment of June sucker (Chasmistes liorus), an endangered fish species that exists naturally only in Utah Lake and its tributaries. In addition to fulfilling environmental commitments associated with water development projects in Utah and contributing to recovery of an endangered species, the project is intended to help improve water quality on the lower Provo River and to provide enhancements for public recreation in Utah County. Alternative B has been identified as the preferred alternative because it would minimize the amount of private lands that would need to be acquired for the project while still providing adequate space for a naturally functioning river delta and sufficient habitat enhancement for achieving the need for the project. The agencies preparing the Final EIS are the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission (Mitigation Commission), the Central Utah Water Conservancy District, and the Central Utah Project Completion Act (CUPCA) Office of the U.S. Department of the Interior, collectively referred to as the Joint Lead Agencies. The Final EIS, Executive Summary and Technical Reports can be viewed or downloaded from the project website www.ProvoRiverDelta.us or by requesting a copy on CD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1991 The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915 Stephen A. Hales Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hales, Stephen A., "The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915" (1991). Theses and Dissertations. 4740. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LZ THE EFFECT OF THE RIVALRY BETWEEN JESSE KNIGHT AND THOMAS NICHOLLS TAYLOR ON architecture IN PROVO UTAH 189619151896 1915 A thesis presented to the department of art brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts 0 stephen A hales 1991 by stephen A hales december 1991 this thesis by stephen A hales is accepted in its present form by the department of art of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree master of arts i r rr f 1 C mark hamilton committee0amimmiweemee chilechair mark Johnjohndonjohnkonjohnmmitteekonoon committeec6mmittee
    [Show full text]
  • The Review 2018-19 Rate Card & Publication Schedule
    THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT VOICE OF UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY THE REVIEW 2018-19 RATE CARD & PUBLICATION SCHEDULE tah Valley University is the largest THERE ARE 40,000 university in the state. UVU is Uexpected to have 40,000+ students REASONS TO enrolled in 2018. If you do business along the Wasatch Front and are looking to get your message to this diverse and dynamic ADVERTISE WITH audience THE UVU REVIEW has a number of effective advertising options that will fit THE UVU REVIEW any budget. FULL PAGE PRINT 10.875” wide • 20” tall ADVERTISING Single Issue: $900 Five Issues: Buy 4 get 1 free We have sizes and prices to Semester: $10,000 (14 issues) fit every budget. Our Full, Full Year: $19,000 (32 issues) Half, & Quarter Page ads No additional cost for color MOST always include full-color at POPULAR no additional charge. AD SIZE QUARTER PAGE 5.388” wide • 10” tall Single Issue: $250 CLASSIFIED Five Issues: Buy 4 get 1 free 1.7” wide Semester: $2500 (14 issues) 3” tall Full Year: $4250 (32 issues) Single Issue: No additional cost for color $20, $10 each additional issue BUSINESS CARD 3.5” wide • 2” tall Single Issue: $30 Semester: $300 (14 issues) Full Year: $500 (32 issues) HALF PAGE 10.875” wide • 10” tall Single Issue: $475 BLOCK Five Issues: Buy 4 get 1 free 3.5” wide • 4” tall Semester: $5000 (14 issues) Single Issue: $50 Full Year: $9,000 (32 issues) Semester: $500 (14 issues) No additional cost for color Full Year: $900 (32 issues) EIGHTH PAGE CUBE 5.388” wide • 5” tall TOWER Single Issue: $125 3.5” wide • 6” tall Semester: $1500(14 issues) Single Issue: $80 Full Year: $2750 (32 issues) Semester: $800 (14 issues) No additional cost for color Full Year: $1500 (32 issues) Color +$50 per single issue, Ask how you can combine web and print Free Color with Semester & advertising and save! Full Year Contracts.
    [Show full text]