DOCSLIB.ORG

Myth and Symbol I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myth and Symbol I Myth and Symbol I Symbolic phenomena in ancient Greek culture PAPERS FROM THE NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE AT ATHENS 1. The Norwegian Institute at Athens: The first five lectures. Ed. 0ivind Andersen and Helene Whittaker. Athens and Bergen, 1991. 86 pp. ISBN 960-85145-0-9. 2. Greece & Gender. Ed. Brit Berggreen and Nanno Marinatos. Bergen, 1995. 184 pp. ISBN 82-91626-oo-6. 3. Homer's world: Fiction, Tradition, Reality. Ed. 0ivind Andersen and Matthew Dickie. Bergen, 1995. 173 pp. ISBN 82-991411-9-2. 4· The world of ancient magic. Ed. David R. Jordan, Hugo Montgomery, Einar Thomas­ sen. Bergen, 1999. 335 pp. ISBN 82-91626-15-4. 5. Myth & symbol I. Symbolic phenomena in ancient Greek culture. Ed. Synnove des Bouvrie. Bergen, 2002. 333 pp. ISBN 82-91626-21-9. Front cover: 'The funeral games at the burial rites for Patroklos.' Attic black figure vase by Sophilos, early sixth century (Athens, nr. NAM 154 99, with the permission of the National Archaeological Museum) Papers from the Norwegian Institute at Athens 5 Myth and Symbol I Symbolic phenomena in ancient Greek culture Papers from the first international symposium on symbolism at the University ofTroms0, June 4-7,1998 Edited by Synn0ve des Bouvrie Bergen 2002 © The authors and The Norwegian Institute at Athens Composed in Minion and Symbol Greek Published with support from the Norwegian Research Council Distributor Paul Astroms Forlag William Gibsons vag 11 S-433 76 Jonsered Sweden The Norwegian Institute at Athens, 2002 ISSN 1105-4204 ISBN 82-91626-21-9 Printed in Norway 2002 John Grieg Grafisk AS, Bergen Contents Foreword 7 The definition of myth. 11 Symbolic phenomena in ancient Greek culture Synnove des Bouvrie Focusing on the invisible: 71 Greek myth and symbol contemplation Herbert Hoffmann Genealogy as a form of mythic discourse: 89 the case of the Phaeacians Jaakko Aronen Gaia/Ge: entre mythe, culte et ideologie 113 Stella Georgoudi Odysseus versus the Cyclops 135 Jan. N. Bremmer The Life Cycle of the Archaic Greek Warrior and Hero: 153 The Interplay of Myth and Genre in Imagery Nanno Marinatos Greek myth- Etruscan symbol 171 Marjatta Nielsen Mythe et tragedie dans l'Alceste d'Euripide 199 Louise Bruit Zaidman Retheorizing Myth 215 Bruce Lincoln To lock up Eleusis: A question of liminal space 233 Dag 0istein Endsj0 Rethinking Sisyphos 259 Kirsti K. Simonsuuri Syloson's Cloak and other Greek Myths 275 Jesper Svenbro The Symbol of the Warrior in Greek Tragedy? 287 Synn0ve des Bouvrie Artemis, Pan et Marathon: mythe, 313 polytheisme et evenement historique Pierre Ellinger Foreword THE PRESENT volume is the result of a joint effort of a group of scholars who felt the need to discuss the nature of what is commonly labelled 'myth,' all being actively engaged in the interpretation of concrete expressions of ancient, mostly Greek, culture. Despite the fact that two centuries of scholarly debate have passed and wonderful progress has been made in interpreting specific manifestations of'myth' during the last 25 or so years, there still exists a palpable reluctance to define 'myth' in a clear and concise way. A recently held congress on the theme of ancient myth did not address the problem at all. It is within this situation we felt the necessity to address the crucial question of definition within a comparative framework. The result was a symposium held at the University of Troms0 in the midnight sun of 1998. It was not our aim to endorse once more some ethnocentric belief in the universal existence of a category of tales, 'myths; but on the contrary, to discuss the problem and examine the various assumptions and questions that have dominated the study of' Greek myths.' We wished to examine why the question of definition has ended in an impasse, and to discuss different possible approaches to phenomena we meet in large quantities within our field. Our discussions have been an extra­ ordinarily exhilarating and invigorating experience, but regrettably this part of our cooperation has not been rendered in the volume. On the other hand, we hope that readers without being coloured by our views and preferences, in turn will engage in similar inspiring discussions and pose new questions. The phenomenon of 'myth,' which we profitably may conceive of as a manifestation of what in recent time has been called 'symbolism; is, after all, a deeply human activity. A word of explanation is required for the extensive article on the definition of myth. It was attached to the editor's invitation to the Troms0 symposium and a number of the participants later urged this common starting point to be included into our collection of papers. The contributions have not been ordered in any systematic way, nor do we pretend to offer an exhausting range of approaches. In the light of the current reluctance to define and speak about a phenomenon like 'myth,' we have felt it necessary to identify and name certain human tendencies to create shared perceptions and to generate cultural forces. Most papers have engaged in examining specific tales belonging to the well known corpus of 'Greek myths; either manifested in narrative (Aronen, Bruit Zaidman) or in imagery (Hoff­ mann), while others have explored symbolic tales (Svenbro) and iconography (Marinatos). Some have traced a tale's wanderings to distant regions and foreign recipients, exploring these new encounters (Bremmer, Nielsen, Simonsuuri). Others again have emphasised the workings (Hoffmann) or contexts of mythical tradi­ tions in order to meet the living community and the multifarious manifestations of mythical or symbolic expression ( Georgoudi, Endsj0, des Bouvrie, Ellinger). Herbert Hoffmann investigates the levels of meaning and especially the modes of use in fifth-century society of a drinking cup decorated with the myth of Polyei­ dos and Glaukos. He concludes that the various aspects of the tale and the imagery point to mystic belief and initiation. Jaakko Aronen explores the morphology of mythical tales and concludes that genealogical structures serve subtle aims of a community's conceptual organisa­ tion of the world and its value systems. A related problem is raised by Stella Georgoudi, who addresses the figure of Gaia or Ge. Unlike modern ideas of Mother Earth, the Greek perception of Gaia did not convey general notions of fertility but structured the individual's orienta­ tion in his or her social world. Jan Bremmer's analysis of the Polyphemos myth demonstrates not only how elements of the tale are widely distributed in folk traditions but are also interwoven with other tales, and how they may point to common origins in ritual. Nann6 Marinatos proposes in her paper to assume an encoded cultural com­ munication at work in the corpus of shield strap motifs from the archaic age, concluding that these generical and mythical motifs constituted a coherent norm system valid among their carriers. Marjatta Nielsen offers a twofold analysis of symbolic expressions in Etruscan iconography, which covers a wide time span and explores the principles governing the choice and employment of generic and Greek mythical imagery. Louise Bruit Zaidman investigates the various mythical strands meeting in the tragedy of Alcestis and offers a way to understand the drama through its structuring of the mythical complex and its interaction with contemporary perceptions of the human condition and central social values. Bruce Lincoln's paper discusses some basic properties of mythical narrative, emphasising their taxonomic but also dynamic and ideological nature. Presenting a model for analysing such narrative Lincoln applies it to a Platonic tale. FOREWORD 9 Dag 0istein Endsj0 studies Greek notions of the geographical periphery and poses the question whether these concepts of space should not be understood as images of the liminal state in myth and ritual. Kirsti Simonsuuri's contribution on the Sisyphos tale covers a vast time span, exploring the polysemic nature of the myth and its capacity to both retain patterns of interpretation as well as inspire new generations to express their experiences through this medium. Jesper Svenbro argues for the proposition that objects and names may generate mythical narrative, offering examples in a study of the Orpheus myth as well as a Herodotean narrative that reveals an implied cultural message. Synn0ve des Bouvrie presents a theoretical framework for the interpretation of mythic drama, suggesting that the shock and horror of the drama are to be under­ stood at the level of central cultural symbols, illustrating her model with the example of the warrior symbol. Pierre Ellinger examines the apparently enigmatic apparitions of certain deities in the context of wars and battles. Analysing the details of the historical reports he finds a subtle logic behind these major symbolic figures. This publication as well as the symposium that was its source have been made possible due to the generous support from the Norwegian Research Council and the University of Troms0. For abbreviations of the ancient authors' names, the reader should consult the list in the Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edition, and for the abbreviations of periodicals, the list in L' Annee philologique. Synnove des Bouvrie Bergen, August 2002 The definition of myth. Symbolical phenomena in ancient culture Synm'JVe des Bouvrie Introduction THE PRESENT article aims at making a contribution to the definition of myth as well as to the discussion about the substance of what is commonly referred to as 'myth.' It does not pretend to give the final answer to all questions related to this intricate problem, but to offer some clarification at the present moment, when the term 'myth' is freely in use among classical scholars without always being suffi­ ciently defined. In fact the question of definition seems indeed to be avoided. In addressing this question I will proceed along two lines and study the nature and 'existence' of myth from a social as well as from a biological point of view.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TWO RADIO DRAMAS of LOVE, HATE and REVENGE 1. Introduction
    doi: 10.19090/i.2018.29.176-191 UDC: 821.14'02-2 ISTRAŽIVANJA ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES Received: 13 March 2018 29 (2018) Accepted: 9 July 2018 GORDAN MARIČIĆ University of Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Classics [email protected] IFIGENIJA RADULOVIĆ University of Novi Sad Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History [email protected] JELENA TODOROVIĆ University of Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History [email protected] TWO RADIO DRAMAS OF LOVE, HATE AND REVENGE Abstract: The topic of this paper is an ancient and everlasting story of love, hate, and vengeance. This archetypal narrative was recreated and staged in the 1960s in the form of two radio dramas by two Serbian (at the time Yugoslav) playwrights Jovan Hristić and Velimir Lukić. By means of those plays the two renowned scholars and playwrights achieved the revival of the previously mentioned ancient myth in the contemporary circumstances and rewrote the old story using modern features and language. Keywords: ancient myth, love, hate, revenge, radio drama, Orestes, Medea. 1. Introduction ovan Hristić (b. 1933, d. 2002) and Velimir Lukić (b. 1936, d. 1997) are distinct drama representatives belonging to the well-known group of Serbian playwrights with a Jcharacteristic reflexive-poetic orientation, who emerged in the 1960s and enriched Serbian dramatic literature with a new approach to the world based on the relocation of the ancient myths in the contemporary reality and on the rational analysis of the burning social and moral issues of their times. At the time Yugoslavia was already open to the West and 176 published literary works which appeared to be radically detached from the doctrine of Socialist Realism.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4. Hatred in Hesiod
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Kilgallon, Silvie Title: Hatred in Hesiod General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Hatred in Hesiod Silvie Kilgallon A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, January 2019. Word Count: 75,322. 2 Abstract: This thesis examines the conception and role of hatred in the Theogony and Works and Days of Hesiod.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish and Christian Cosmogony in Late Antiquity
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum Edited by Peter Schäfer (Princeton, NJ/Berlin) Annette Yoshiko Reed (Philadelphia, PA) Seth Schwartz (New York, NY) Azzan Yadin-Israel (New Brunswick, NJ) 155 Jewish and Christian Cosmogony in Late Antiquity Edited by Lance Jenott and Sarit Kattan Gribetz Mohr Siebeck Lance Jenott, born 1980, is a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Oslo. He studied History, Classics, and Religion at the University of Washington (Seattle) and Princeton University, and holds a PhD in the Religions of Late Antiquity from Princeton University. Sarit Kattan Gribetz, born 1984, is a post-doctoral fellow at the Jewish Theological Semi- nary and Harvard University. She studied Religion, Jewish Studies, and Classics at Prince- ton University, where she earned an AB and PhD in the Religions of Late Antiquity. ISBN 978-3-16-151993-2 ISSN 0721-8753 (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2013 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany, www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Guide-Druck in Tübingen and bound by Großbuchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. Preface This volume presents essays that emerged from a colloquium on the topic of cosmogony (the creation of the world) among ancient Jews and Chris- tians held at Princeton University in May 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:23:19Z
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cork Open Research Archive Title Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The significance of archaic civilization for the modern world Author(s) Szakolczai, Árpád Publication date 2009-12 Original citation Szakolczai, A., 2009. Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World. In Center of Excellence Cultural Foundations of Integration, New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations. Konstanz, Germany 8 – 9 Dec 2009. Type of publication Conference item Rights ©2010, Árpád Szakolczai http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/200 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:23:19Z Szakolczai, A., 2009. Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World. In Center of Excellence Cultural Foundations of Integration, New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations. Konstanz, Germany 8 – 9 Dec 2009. CORA Cork Open Research Archive http://cora.ucc.ie 1 Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World by Arpad Szakolczai School of Philosophy and Sociology University College, Cork Paper prepared for the workshop entitled ‘New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations’, 8- 9 December 2009, organized by the Center of Excellence ‘Cultural Foundations of Integration’, University of Konstanz. Draft version; please, do not quote without permission. 2 Introduction Concerning the theme of the conference, from the perspective of the social sciences it seems to me that there are – and indeed can only be – two quite radically different positions.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Muses Sang: Theogony 1-115 Jenny Strauss Clay
    STRAUSS CLAY, JENNY, What the Muses Sang: "Theogony" 1-115 , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 29:4 (1988:Winter) p.323 What the Muses Sang: Theogony 1-115 Jenny Strauss Clay HE PROEM to the Theogony has often been analyzed both in T terms of its formal structure and in relation to recurrent hym­ nic conventions;l it has also been interpreted as a fundamental statement of archaic Greek poetics.2 While differing somewhat in its perspective, the present investigation builds on and complements those previous studies. Dedicated to the Muses, the patronesses of poetry, the opening of the Theogony repeatedly describes these divini­ ties engaged in their characteristic activity, that is, singing. In the course of the proem, the Muses sing four times: once as they descend from Helicon (lines 11-21), twice on Olympus (44-50, 66f), and once as they make their way from their birthplace in Pieria and ascend to Olympus (71-75). In addition, the prologue describes the song the goddesses inspire in their servants, the aoidoi (99-101), as well as the song Hesiod requests that they sing for him, the invocation proper (105-15). My aim here is a simple one: to examine the texts and contexts of each of these songs and to compare them to the song the Muses instruct Hesiod to sing and the one he finally produces. I See, for example, P. Friedlander, "Das Pro6mium von Hesiods Theogonie" (1914), in E. HEITSCH, Hesiod (Darmstadt 1966: hereafter "Heitsch") 277-94; W. Otto, "Hesiodea," in Varia Variorum: Festgabe fUr Karl Reinhardt (Munster 1952) 49-53; P.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 147 of Microsoft Word
    УДК 82'01''Медея'' THE SOURCES OF THE MYTH OF MEDEA IN THE POSITIVE LIGHT OF THE PRE-EURIPIDIAN INTERPRETATIONS AND THEIR EVOLUTION IN THE NEGATIVE SHADE Vazhynska Olena Ihorivna, Postgraduate student Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev The present article is dedicated to the analysis of the pre-Euripidian sources and literary premises of a classical version of the myth of Medea. The very first references and details of the character are being exam- ined in this research in order to give the readers a full comprehension of the construction of an image of a barbarian, murder, mother and lover which interlace in all its complicity of features. Key words: allusions of Medea in pre-Euripidian literature, sources of the myth, construction of the image of Medea. In a world literary tradition the source of the myth of Medea is considered to be the homonymous drama of Euripides, dated 431 BC. Due to the great influence and authority of the ancient poet, his drama became a source of a reference for a range of distinguished authors, such as Corneille, Grillparzer, Alvaro, Anouilh, Tomassini, Theodorakis, Mül- ler, etc.1. However, the aim of this research is to reveal the existence of the image of Medea long time before the version of Euripides, thus, we will examine the first mentions of the hypostasis in the early pre-Eurpidian literature that existed long time before the creation of the classical variant. According to the purpose of the research paper, we can determine the following objectives: 1) to identify the pre-Euripidian texts related to the myth of Medea; 2) to define the first allusions of Medea and Argonauts in the Antiquity; 3) to confront the early mentioning with the subsequent image of Medea; 4) to reveal the positive nature of the character in pre-Euripidian literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer's Iliad Senior Thesis
    Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer’s Iliad Senior Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Undergraduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Classical Studies Professor Joel Christensen, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts By Joana Jankulla May 2018 Copyright by Joana Jankulla 1 Copyright by Joana Jankulla © 2018 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Joel Christensen. Thank you, Professor Christensen for guiding me through this process, expressing confidence in me, and being available whenever I had any questions or concerns. I would not have been able to complete this work without you. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Ann Olga Koloski-Ostrow and Professor Cheryl Walker for reading my thesis and providing me with feedback. The Classics Department at Brandeis University has been an instrumental part of my growth in my four years as an undergraduate, and I am eternally thankful to all the professors and staff members in the department. Thank you to my friends, specifically Erica Theroux, Sarah Jousset, Anna Craven, Rachel Goldstein, Taylor McKinnon and Georgie Contreras for providing me with a lot of emotional support this year. I hope you all know how grateful I am for you as friends and how much I have appreciated your love this year. Thank you to my mom for FaceTiming me every time I was stressed about completing my thesis and encouraging me every step of the way. Finally, thank you to Ian Leeds for dropping everything and coming to me each time I needed it.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen the Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals Bremmer, Jan N
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen The Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals Bremmer, Jan N. Published in: Greek Sacrificial Ritual: Olympian and Chthonian IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Bremmer, J. N. (2005). The Sacrifice of Pregnant Animals. In B. Alroth, & R. Hägg (Eds.), Greek Sacrificial Ritual: Olympian and Chthonian (pp. 155-165). Gothenburg: Paul Astroms Forlag. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2019 THE SACRIFICE OF PREGNANT ANIMALS by JAN N. BREMMER There has recently been renewed interest in Olympian sacrifice and its chthonian counterparts, 1 but much less attention has been paid to its more unusual variants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hecate of the Theogony Jenny Strauss Clay
    STRAUSS CALY, JENNY, The Hecate of the "Theogony" , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 25:1 (1984) p.27 The Hecate of the Theogony Jenny Strauss Clay EAR THE MIDDLE of the Theogony, Hesiod appears to drop N everything in order to launch into an extended encomium of Hecate (411-52). Because of its length and apparent lack of integration into its context, but above all because of the peculiar terms of praise reserved for the goddess, the so-called "Hymn to Hecate" has often been dismissed as an intrusion into the Hesiodic text.l To be sure, voices have also been raised in defense,2 and, at present, the passage stands unbracketed in the editions of Mazon, Solmsen, and West.3 But questions remain even if the authenticity of the lines is acknowledged. Why does Hesiod devote so much space to so minor a deity? What is the origin and function of Hesiod's Hecate, and what role does she play in the poem ?4 1 Most notably by U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Der Glaube der Hellenen I (Berlin 1931) 172. Wilamowitz is followed by M. P. Nilsson, Geschichte der griechischen Re/igion 3 I (Munich 1969) 723. Condemnation is fairly universal among earlier editors. Cf 0. Gruppe, Ueber die Theogonie des Hesiod (Berlin 1841) 72; G. Schoemann, Die He­ siodische Theogonie (Berlin 1868) 190, who, after many good observations, concludes that the passage is a later interpolation; H. Flach, Die Hesiodische Theogonie (Berlin 1873) 81; A. Fick, Hesiods Gedichte (Gottingen 1887) 17 ("Der Verfasser war ein Or­ phiker"); F.
    [Show full text]