Expression and Communication in Art Author(s): Edward S. Casey Source: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Winter, 1971), pp. 197- 207 Published by: Wiley on behalf of The American Society for Aesthetics Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/429538 . Accessed: 29/05/2014 11:04 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Wiley and The American Society for Aesthetics are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.49.23.145 on Thu, 29 May 2014 11:04:30 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions EDWARD S. CASEY Expression and Communicationin Art THE PHENOMENON OF EXPRESSION iS one ward criteria." 2 Variations on this theme of the most elusive objects of philosophical can be seen in such otherwise diverse phi- description. It is not unambiguously clear losophers as Wilfrid Sellars and Stuart what kind of object expression is, or even Hampshire.3 whether it is an object at all. The very term Another form of the move toward the ex-pression seems to suggest a process rather manifest and objective is found in certain than an object: an exteriorizing of an inner versions of phenomenology.