F. Garbari, A. Giovannini & D. Marchetti Biosystematics, Taxonomy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Presentazione Standard Di Powerpoint
Paolo Savi (1823-1871) Storie di un direttore: Il Museo di Storia Naturale nell’Ottocento Simone Farina Elenco delle pubblicazioni: Elenco delle accademie e società: http://notes9.senato.it/Web/senregno.NSF/e 56bbbe8d7e9c734c125703d002f2a0c/c73d62 9d5b66d0ea4125646f0060617d?OpenDocum ent Paolo Savi (Pisa 1798 - Pisa 1871) Figlio dell’illustre botanico Gaetano Savi. Nel 1814 a 16 anni frequentava l’Università e conseguì la laurea in Scienze Fisiche e Naturali nel 1817. Nel 1818 divenne aiuto del padre per la cattedra di botanica. G. Leopardi Nel 1821 fu nominato aiuto-professore di storia naturale con l’incarico di formare le collezioni zoologiche del Museo Pisano, di cui divenne direttore nel 1823 succedendo a Giorgio Santi e rimanendo in carica fino alla morte e arricchendo incredibilmente il G. Savi patrimonio e il prestigio del Museo stesso. Fu zoologo, geologo e tassidermista di importanza internazionale. G. Santi Il Museo prima di Paolo Savi: “null'altro eravi di molto pregevole che la collezione del Gualtieri, vero monumento nella storia della scienza. Il cranio summentovato del Gassendo, pochi teschi di mammiferi (due di lupo, uno di volpe e uno di ghiro) una mano disseccata di foca, un pezzo di pelle umana conciata, una trentina d'uccelletti nostrali tarmati, pochi pesci ripieni di gesso e altre cose di nessun pregio formavano con esse tutta la suppellettile scientifica del luogo” Antonio D’Achiardi “Era affatto mancante di quadrupedi, d'uccelli, di pesci, insetti e vermi, e non vi era luogo dove collocarli” Gaetano Savi Con l’inizio dell’800 le esposizioni museali cambiano, assumendo una valenza didattica e rivolgendosi ad un pubblico più vasto. -
Download Document
African countries and neighbouring islands covered by the Synopsis. S T R E L I T Z I A 23 Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands by J.P. Roux Pretoria 2009 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It sym- bolises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustain- able use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. J.P. Roux South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Cape Town SCIENTIFIC EDITOR: Gerrit Germishuizen TECHNICAL EDITOR: Emsie du Plessis DESIGN & LAYOUT: Elizma Fouché COVER DESIGN: Elizma Fouché, incorporating Blechnum palmiforme on Gough Island PHOTOGRAPHS J.P. Roux Citing this publication ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-48-8 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. -
Vascular Plants
Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups Chapter 11 Vascular Plants Authors Ian Taylor, Simon J. Leach, John P. Martin, Robert A. Jones, Julian Woodman and Iain Macdonald To view other Part 2 chapters and Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines visit: https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/guidelines-for-selection-of-sssis/ Cite as: Taylor, I., Leach, S. J., Martin, J. P., Jones, R. A., Woodman, J. and Macdonald, I. 2021. Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 11 Vascular Plants. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. © Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2021 Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs – Part 2: Chapter 11 Vascular Plants (2021 revision v1.0) Cover note This chapter updates and replaces the previous Vascular Plant (VP) SSSI selection guidelines for vascular plants (JNCC 1989). It was drafted initially by Ian Taylor, Simon J. Leach and John P. Martin (NE) and Robert A. Jones (NRW), with the final draft in November 2020 produced by Ian Taylor (NE), Julian Woodman (NRW) and Iain Macdonald (NatureScot). It provides detailed guidance for selecting vascular plant sites throughout Great Britain to recommend for notification as SSSIs. It should be used in conjunction with Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines (Bainbridge et al. 2013), which details the overarching rationale, operational approach and criteria for the selection of SSSIs. The main changes from the previous vascular plant guidelines are: • a change of emphasis in favour of a species-by-species focus versus an in- combination (or assemblage) focus. -
La Botanique Dans Un Contexte Local: Les Jardins De Florence À L’Époque Des Grands-Ducs (1569–1859)
Gesnerus 74/1 (2017) 5–52 La botanique dans un contexte local: les jardins de Florence à l’époque des grands-ducs (1569–1859) René Sigrist et Sonia Zanier* Summary This article describes the social and institutional conditions of the practice of botany in early modern Florence. This practice started with the study of medical plants in hospital and university contexts, with the passion of the Medicis for gardens, and the interest of the Vallombrosian monks for cryp- togams. During the XVIIIth century, science of plants focused on classifi cation (morphology), pharmacology (materia medica) and vegetable phy siology, but included also the inventory of Tuscan flora and agronomy. These diverging aims created tensions within the nascent community of botanists, crystallizing around the management of gardens and the choice of classifi cation systems. After 1770, a more scientific approach of botany was made possible by the rise of experimental practices and the development of chem- istry. Yet, a true professionalization of research did not occur before the political unification of Italy, when the management of institutions and the recruitment of botanists were assumed by a central Ministry of education, instead of being dependent on princely favors and patrician connections. Keywords: botany, Florence, 18th century, gardens, agronomy * Cette recherche, menée pour l’essentiel à l’Institut des Sciences Sociales de l’Université de Lausanne, a été financée par le Fonds National Suisse de la recherche scientifique, subsides no 100.011_137.579 et 100.011_166.345. Les auteurs tiennent à témoigner leur gratitude envers Emma Spary pour ses suggestions bibliographiques et interprétatives, ainsi que pour ses nombreuses remarques. -
Flora Mediterranea 26
FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M. -
Winter 2006- 1 President’S Message Winter 2005/2006 Greetings
THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 166 Medina, WA 98039-0166 Web site: www.hardvferns.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corpo¬ rate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Satellite fern gardens are at the Stephen Austin Arboretum, Nacogdoches, Texas, Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama, California State University at Sacramento, Sacramento, California, Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay, Maine, Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas, Denver Botanic Gardens. Denver, Colorado, Georgeson Botanical Garden, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Harry P. Leu Garden, Orlando, Florida, Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio, Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden, Richmond, Virginia, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, and Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California. The fern display gardens are at Bainbridge Island Library, Bainbridge Island, WA, Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington, Les Jardins de Metis, Quebec, Canada, Rotary Gardens, Janesville, Wl, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, KY. Hardy Fern Foundation members participate in a spore exchange, receive a quarterly newsletter and have first access to ferns as they are ready for distribution. Cover Design by Willanna Bradner HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY ISSN 1542-5517 ^ 1 ^ ® rd? « a. -
Fern Classification
16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed. -
Disentangling the Diversity and Taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Comoros Ahamada H
Disentangling the diversity and taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Comoros Ahamada H. Saïd, Sabine Hennequin, Germinal Rouhan, Jean-Yves Dubuisson To cite this version: Ahamada H. Saïd, Sabine Hennequin, Germinal Rouhan, Jean-Yves Dubuisson. Disentangling the diversity and taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Comoros. Eu- ropean Journal of Taxonomy, Consortium of European Natural History Museums, 2017, 313, pp.1-53. 10.5852/ejt.2017.313. hal-01528615 HAL Id: hal-01528615 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01528615 Submitted on 29 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License European Journal of Taxonomy 313: 1–53 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.313 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Saïd A.H. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph Disentangling the diversity and taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Comoros Ahamada H. SAÏD 1,*, Sabine HENNEQUIN 2, Germinal ROUHAN 3 & Jean-Yves DUBUISSON 4 1,3 Institut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, UPMC, EPHE, Herbier National, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, 75005 Paris, France. -
Novedades Para La Pteridoflora Ibérica En El Contexto De Un Nuevo Sistema Para Las Plantas Vasculares Sin Semilla
ARTÍCULOS Botanica Complutensis ISSN-e: 1988-2874 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/BOCM.61369 Novedades para la pteridoflora ibérica en el contexto de un nuevo sistema para las plantas vasculares sin semilla Jose María Gabriel y Galán1, Sonia Molino, Pablo de la Fuente, Andrea Seral Recibido: 22 diciembre 2017 / Aceptado: 10 enero 2018. Resumen. Recientemente ha sido publicada una nueva propuesta de clasificación de las plantas vasculares sin semilla (PPG1) hasta el rango de género, basada en caracteres morfológicos y filogenias moleculares, siendo consensuada por un gran número de especialistas en pteridología. Tras un año desde su aparición ha sido ampliamente aceptada por la comunidad científica. Esta nueva propuesta de clasificación presenta una serie de importantes cambios respecto a sistemas anteriores, entre ellos el empleado para la Flora Iberica I. Este trabajo plantea una actualización a la propuesta del PPG1 de la clasificación y nomenclatura de los taxones de licófitos y helechos de la flora ibérica. Palabras clave: PPG1; flora ibérica; helechos; licófitos; nomenclatura; clasificación. [en] Novelties for the iberian pteridoflora in the context of a new system for the seedless vascular plants Abstract. Recently, a new classification proposal for the seedless vascular plants, until the range of genus (PPG1), has come to light. This system considers both morphological characters and molecular phylogenies, and is based on consensus by a large number of specialists in pteridology. In its first year of life, it is being widely accepted by the scientific community. This taxonomic classification presents a series of novelties with respect to previous systems, including the one used for Flora Iberica. -
Rare and Threatened Pteridophytes of Asia 2. Endangered Species of India — the Higher IUCN Categories
Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 38(4), pp. 153–181, November 22, 2012 Rare and Threatened Pteridophytes of Asia 2. Endangered Species of India — the Higher IUCN Categories Christopher Roy Fraser-Jenkins Student Guest House, Thamel. P.O. Box no. 5555, Kathmandu, Nepal E-mail: [email protected] (Received 19 July 2012; accepted 26 September 2012) Abstract A revised list of 337 pteridophytes from political India is presented according to the six higher IUCN categories, and following on from the wider list of Chandra et al. (2008). This is nearly one third of the total c. 1100 species of indigenous Pteridophytes present in India. Endemics in the list are noted and carefully revised distributions are given for each species along with their estimated IUCN category. A slightly modified update of the classification by Fraser-Jenkins (2010a) is used. Phanerophlebiopsis balansae (Christ) Fraser-Jenk. et Baishya and Azolla filiculoi- des Lam. subsp. cristata (Kaulf.) Fraser-Jenk., are new combinations. Key words : endangered, India, IUCN categories, pteridophytes. The total number of pteridophyte species pres- gered), VU (Vulnerable) and NT (Near threat- ent in India is c. 1100 and of these 337 taxa are ened), whereas Chandra et al.’s list was a more considered to be threatened or endangered preliminary one which did not set out to follow (nearly one third of the total). It should be the IUCN categories until more information realised that IUCN listing (IUCN, 2010) is became available. The IUCN categories given organised by countries and the global rarity and here apply to political India only. -
Contribution to the Knowledge of the Pteridological Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands)
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses Botanica Complutensis ISSN: 0214-4565 2001, 25, 289-297 Contribution to the knowledge of the Pteridological Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands) Cleo BONALBERTI PERONI, Adalberto PERONI & Gabriele PERONI Museo Insubrico di Scienze Naturali, Piazza Giovanni XXIII 4, 21056 Indumo Olona (VA), Italy Abstract BONALBERTI PERONI, C., PERONI, A. & PERONI, G. 2001. Contribution to the knowledge of the Pteridoligical Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands). Bot. Complutensis 25: 289-297. A study on the Pteridophyta of El Hierro, the western island of the Canary Archipelago, was realized. A census of 30 taxa subdivided in 12 families was made. Some notes have a greatest importance for the rareness of species or for ecological conditions where taxa ve- getate. Key words: Pteridophyta, distribution, Canary Islands, El Hierro. Resumen BONALBERTI PERONI, C., PERONI, A. & PERONI, G. 2001. Contribución al conocimiento de la flora pteridológica de El Hierro (Islas Canarias). Bot. Complutensis 25: 289-297. Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio de los pteridófitos de El Hierro, la más occidental de las islas del archipiélago canario. En total se han censado 30 táxones pertenecientes a 12 fami- lias. Las especies se acompañan de datos sobre su rareza y condiciones ecológicas en que se desarrollan. Palabras clave: Pteridophyta, distribución, Islas Canarias, El Hierro. INTRODUCTION The Canary Islands are located between 27°37′ (Punta de la Restinga, El Hie- rro) and 29°25′ (Punta de los Mosegos, Alegranza) of north latitude and between 13°20′ (Roque del Este) and 18°10′ (Punta de Orchilla, El Hierro) of west longitude in conformity with the Greenwich meridian. -
Hymenophyllaceae) and a New Combination in Trichomanes L
Muelleria 39: 75–78 Published online in advance of the print edition, 21 December 2020 Comparison of modern classifications for filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae) and a new combination in Trichomanes L. for the filmy fern Macroglena brassii Croxall, from Queensland, Australia Daniel J. Ohlsen Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Avenue, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; email: [email protected] Introduction Abstract Contemporary Hymenophyllaceae The filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae) are a distinctive group of treatments typically follow one of leptosporangiate ferns distinguished by a thin membranous lamina that two classifications that recognise is usually one cell thick (or occasionally up to four cells thick in some parts monophyletic genera. One comprises of the lamina) and marginal sori that are protected by an indusium in the nine genera, while the other recognises form of a cup-shaped or bilabiate involucre (Ebihara et al. 2007). Forty nine two genera, Hymenophyllum Sm. and Trichomanes L. Combinations exist for species of this family occur in Australia, of which 15 are probably endemic all Australian species that allow the (Green 1994; Bostock & Spokes 1998; Ebihara & Iwatsuki 2007). Two major former classification to be adopted lineages exist within the Hymenophyllaceae that largely correspond to the in Australia. However, genera of the two original genera recognised within the family: Hymenophyllum Sm. and former classification tend to be poorly Trichomanes L. (Pryer et al. 2001; Hennequin et al. 2003; Ebihara et al. 2004). defined morphologically compared to Numerous other classifications have been proposed that recognise several the latter classification. All Australian species have available combinations in additional genera (e.g.