IEE: Armenia: Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IEE: Armenia: Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project Framework Initial Environmental Examination Report Project No: P45299 Date: January 2012 Republic of Armenia - Water Supply and Sanitation Improvement in the Settlements of Republic of Armenia – Phase 2 The Framework Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB‟s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the "Terms of Use" section of the ADB website. CONTENTS I. POLICY LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1 A. ADB Safeguards Policy Statement 2009 1 B. Legal Setting 1 C. International Conventions 6 D. Institutional Setting 6 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 8 A. Project context 8 B. Type of Project 10 C. Description of the works 10 D. Locations 12 E. Temporary and Enabling Works 14 F. Temporal Context. 14 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 14 A. Physical Environment 14 B. Ecological Resources 16 C. Social and Cultural context 16 IV. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 17 A. Source Approach to Impact Identification 18 B. Physical and Biological Impacts – Target approach 19 C. Socioeconomic Impacts 21 D. Mitigation Measures 22 V. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 25 VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 26 VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 26 VIII. FRAMEWORK ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 28 A. Mitigation 28 B. Monitoring 8 C. Implementation Arrangements 9 D. Performance Indicators. 12 IX. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Appendix A Breakdown of works proposed per sub-project Appendix B EMP Framework Checklist Appendix C Inspection Checklist Attachment I Scoping Document (Available upon request) Attachment II Minutes of Public Consultation (Available upon request) GLOSSARY ADB Asian Development Bank ACM Asbestos Containing Material ASWC Armenia Water and Sewage Company COP Code of Practice DRR Daily Regulating Reservoir EIA Environmental Impact Assessment (according to RA state and ADB specification) EMP Environmental Management Plan (at Project level) FDI Foreign Direct Investment HDPE High Density Poly Ethylene IEE Initial Environmental Examination IFI International Finance Institution MoNP Ministry for Nature Protection PDSC Project Design and Supervision Consultant PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit within the ASWC RA Republic of Armenia SCWE State Committee for Water Economy SPS ADB Safeguards Policy Statement (2009) TA Technical Assistance USD United States Dollars EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The proposed phase 2 of the Water Supply project in Armenia will be implemented within a framework of state supervising bodies and the water supply company. The Implementing Agency operates under the supervision of a state authority, and will engage consultants for detailed design, supervision and for Environmental Risk Management for each of the ten sub-projects. The Design Consultants will determine the implementation of the framework of measures for environmental protection as appropriate for each of the sub projects reflecting local conditions and risks. 2. The phase 2 of the Water supply improvement project in Armenia is an essential project to remediate collapsed networks and supply equipment in 92 rural villages and to realize the potential benefits of the phase 1 projects. The project is 50 million USD, and is made up of 10 separate scopes of work, and will be implemented by small teams of construction contractors. The works are to repair and extend existing facilities and exclude sewage system improvements or any permanent resettlement. 3. The Armenian environment is mountainous with a strong contribution from agricultural activity in the valleys. Armenian Heritage and Environmental resources include many archeological and nature protected resources. Soviet period heavy industry has generally ceased to operate, however reforms by the administration are favoring IFI and FDI interest. 4. The proposed measures are not likely to have any long term impact and each measure will be separately implemented by small construction teams – working in parallel in separate villages. No new lands acquisition will be required as all the scope is in repair upgrading or replacing of existing facilities. The implementation of the Framework Environmental Management Plan will be tailored to the specific sub-projects using a checklist provided as Appendix B, based on this SSEMPs will be developed and their implementation will be monitored in the field. The implementing Agency will provide training to construction Contractors to support implementation of the works in the framework of the EMP and the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement 2009. 5. The project utilizes well established solutions appropriate to the operating socioeconomic environment. 6. Preliminary public consultations were held in 10 towns in November 2011 by the PMU to ADB Guidelines and under TA supervision. Public anxieties are few and those raised can readily be addressed. 7. Due to the limited scope of works and the diffuse nature of the sub projects, no EIA is warranted under ADB guidelines in this case. 8. The presently proposed arrangements for identification and mitigation of impacts are adequate in the context of this project to meet the Environmental Safeguards requirements of the ADB I. POLICY LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK A. ADB Safeguards Policy Statement 2009 1. ADB is committed to assisting Developing Member Countries to pursue environmentally sustainable and inclusive economic growth and is committed to social and environmental sustainability in projects it supports. Environmental, Social and Involuntary Settlement safeguards are set out in the Bank‟s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (SPS) which was approved by the ADB‟s Board of Directors in July 2009. The preparation of this IEE and the implementation of the resulting Environmental management program are part of the means by which the Environmental Safeguards Policy Statement 2009 is applied to this project. 2. The SPS builds upon the three previous safeguard policies on the environment, involuntary resettlement, and Indigenous Peoples, and brings them into a single policy that enhances effectiveness and relevance. The objectives of the SPS are to avoid, or when avoidance is not possible, to minimize and mitigate adverse project impacts on the environment and affected people, and to help borrowers to strengthen their safeguard systems and develop the capacity to manage environmental and social risks. The safeguards Policy addresses risks to Environment, risks from the need for Involuntary Resettlement and risks to indigenous peoples. 3. A proposed project is assigned to one of the following categories, depending on the significance of the potential environmental impacts: 4. Category A. A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment (EIA), including an environmental management plan (EMP), is required. 5. Category B. A proposed project is classified as category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts are less adverse than those of category A projects. These impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for category A projects. An initial environmental examination (IEE), including an EMP, is required. 6. Category C. A proposed project is classified as category C if it is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. An EIA or IEE is not required, although environmental implications need to be reviewed. 7. Category FI. A proposed project is classified as category FI if it involves the investment of ADB funds to, or through, a financial intermediary. The financial intermediary must apply and maintain an environmental and social management system, unless all of the financial intermediary's business activities have minimal or no environmental impacts or risks. 8. A project's environment category is determined by the category of its most environmentally sensitive component, including direct, indirect, induced, and cumulative impacts. Each proposed project is scrutinized as to its type, location, scale, sensitivity and the magnitude of its potential environmental impacts. The level of detail and comprehensiveness of the EIA and IEE are commensurate with the significance of the potential impacts and risks. This IEE is based on the scoping document and identifies the project as a Category B project B. Armenian Laws Governing Environmental Management and Assessment 9. RA laws affecting water and wastewater infrastructure and enforced by the environmental ministries include: RA Law on the Principles of Environmental Protection (1991); RA Water Code (2002); RA Land Code (2001) RA Law on Environmental Impact Assessment (1995); RA Law on Ensuring Sanitary-epidemiological Safety of the RA Population (1992) RA Law on the Protection and Use of Fixed Cultural and Historic Monuments and Historic Environment (1998) 10. RA Law on the Principles of Environmental Protection (1991). The Law on the Principles of Environmental Protection (1991) outlines the environmental protection policy of Armenia. Its purpose is to ensure state regulation of environmental protection and use within the territory of Armenia. It provides a legal basis for the development of environmental legislation regulating
Recommended publications
  • RECYCLING of PLASTIC WASTE: Practices
    SUPPORT TO THE ARMENIA-TURKEY NORMALISATION PROCESS European Union Initiative àôð´²Ü Ï ³ Û á õ Ý ½ ³ ñ · ³ ó Ù ³ Ý ÐÆØܲ¸ð²Ø RECYCLING OF PLASTIC WASTE: Practices www.urbanfoundation.am 1 This information booklet is prepared for waste practitioners and general public. It contains historical overview of waste management practices, speaks about necessity of separation and recycling of plastic waste in the modern world. The booklet tells about the first attempts of separating plastic waste in Armenia, about achievements and lessons learnt. The booklet also provides plastic waste separation and recycling practices in Diyarbakir, Turkey. 2 ABOUT “URBAN” FOUNDATION This initiative was launched by “Urban” Foundation. Since 2008, the organization has been continuously working with communities throughout Armenia, to encourage and educate community members and waste disposal staff to sort and recycle plastic waste, by means of providing relevant capacities and infrastructure. Starting from Alaverdi, today this practice is spread or being spread in more than 20 communities in Armenia, and the first plastic recycling plant will soon be launched in Kapan community of Syunik Marz. àôð´²Ü Ï ³ Û á õ Ý ½ ³ ñ · ³ ó Ù ³ Ý ÐÆØܲ¸ð²Ø 3 A clean place is not the one which is cleaned, “ “ but the one which is not littered 4 ABOUT THE INITIATIVE goods and create economic opportunities for businesses and population. This initiative of “Urban” Foundation aims to Success stories of plastic waste promote cooperation in the field of management in both countries have been management of plastic waste among the included into this booklet. Dissemination of civil society organizations in Armenia and the booklet among interested public, private Turkey, waste management specialists, and governmental organizations of two responsible authorities, and business countries may contribute to the persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Vayots Dzor Marzma
    RA VAYOTS DZOR MARZMA RA VAYOTS DZOR MARZ Marz centre - Eghegnadzor town Territories -Vayk and Eghegnadzor Towns - Eghegnadzor, Jermuk and Vayk RA Vayots Dzor marz is situated in Southern part of the Republic. In the South borders with Nakhijevan, in the North it borders with RA Grgharkunik marz, in the East – RA Syunik marz and in the West – RA Ararat marz. Territory 2308 square km Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 7.8 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 41 Towns 3 Villages 52 Population number as of January 1, 2006 55.8 ths. persons including urban 19.4 ths. persons rural 36.4 ths. persons Share of urban population size 34.8% Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 1.7% Agricultural land 209262 ha including - arable land 16287 ha Vayots dzor is surrounded with high mountains, water-separately mountain ranges, that being original natural banks between its and neighbouring territories, turn that into a geographical single whole. Vayots dzor marz has varied fauna and flora. Natural forests comprise 6.7% or 13240.1 ha of territory. Voyots dzor surface is extraordinary variegated. Volcanic forces, earthquakes, waters of Arpa river and its tributaries raised numerous mountain ranges stretching by different directions with big and small tops, mysterious canyons, mountain passes, plateaus, concavities, fields, meadows and natural varied buildings, the most bright example of which is Jermuk wonderful waterfall (60 m). Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in Figures, 2002-2006 269 The Vayots dzor climate on the whole is continental with cold or moderate cold winters and hot or warm summers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Rural Livelihoods: a Report on Farming and Non-Farm Activities in Three Communities in Armenia
    NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE NRI Report No: 2727 Rural Non-Farm Economy Project Sustaining Rural Livelihoods: A Report On Farming And Non-Farm Activities In Three Communities In Armenia Dr. Hranush Kharatyan Edited by Babken Babajunian and Dr. Monica Janowski March 2003 This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Worldbank for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID or the Worldbank. World Bank Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. INTRODUCTION: STUDY OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY 5 1.1 Objectives of the Study 5 1.2 Organisation of the Report 5 1.3 Research Methodology 5 1.4 Selection of Sites 5 1.5 Research Methods 6 2. POVERTY AND LIVELIHOODS IN ARMENIA 8 2.1 Who are the Poor in Armenia? 8 2.2 What do the Rural Poor Rely Upon? 9 3. FARMING IN ARMENIA NOW: A SOCIAL SAFETY NET 13 3.1 Land distribution, access to land and equity 14 3.2 The importance of landholding 15 3.3 Difficulties in livestock keeping 16 3.4 Lack of resources for investment in increased productivity 17 3.5 Access to irrigation 18 3.6 Demographic changes 18 3.7 Limited access to markets 18 3.8 Refugees: a particularly vulnerable group 20 4. THE NON-FARM ECONOMY 21 4.1 The Non-Farm Economy in Soviet Armenia 21 4.2 The Non-Farm Economy in Post-Soviet Armenia 22 4.2.1 The difficult adjustment to the new political and economic environment 23 4.2.2 Emigration 23 4.2.3 The importance of access to social networks 23 4.2.4 Traditional norms: a source of social support but a disincentive to entrepreneurship 24 4.2.5 Remittances: essential to livelihoods but disincentives to self-sufficiency 25 4.2.6 Access to credit 25 4.2.7 Limited access to a local consumer market 25 4.3 The Nature of Non-Farm Activities in Armenian villages now 26 2 4.4 Who is Engaged in Non-Farm Activities? 29 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Hoc Public Report on Ensuring the Right of Access to Water And
    AD HOC PUBLIC REPORT ON ENSURING THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO WATER AND SANITATION IN PRESCHOOLS AND SCHOOLS YEREVAN 2019 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 8 WATER AND SANITATION ACCESS AS A HUMAN RIGHT ................................................................. 8 1.1 CONTENT AND PRINCIPLES OF RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO .............................................................. 9 WATER AND SANITATION ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2. CRITERIA FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT OF WATER AND SANITATION ............ 12 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 17 ENSURING WATER AND SANITATION RIGHT ................................................................................... 17 IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ........................................................................................................ 17 2.1 FIXATION OF RIGHT OF WATER AND SANITATION IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • “National Capacity Self Assessment for Global Environmental Management”
    “NATIONAL CAPACITY SELF ASSESSMENT FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT” UNDP/GEF/ARM/02/G31/A/1G/99 YEREVAN 2004 The current report has been prepared under UNDP/GEF “National Capacity Self- Assessment for Global Environmental Management” project, executed by the Ministry of Nature Protection and implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) under financial assistance of Global Environment Facility (GEF). The project is aimed at assessment of capacity needs for fulfilment of commitments of Armenia under the United Nations Conventions on Biological Diversity, Climate Change and to Combat Desertification. The ultimate goal of the project is to develop a National Action Plan for capacity building in the cross-cutting areas which can ensure the synergistic effect. Project Coordinator - Diana Harutyunyan Project Assistant - Gayane Simonyan Editor – Mikhail Vermishev Consultants – Simon Papyan, First Deputy Minister of Nature Protection, Aram Gabrielyan UNFCCC Focal Point, Tatyana Danielyan UNCBD Focal Point, Ashot Vardevanyan UNCCD Focal Point The project expresses its special gratitude to Aram Ter-Zakaryan and Georgi Arzumanyan, project National Directors, and Anahit Simonyan, UNDP Environment and Energy Portfolio Manager, for support and professional advice in guiding NCSA process. Project also acknowledges substantive contribution of all organizations and individuals in preparation of the current study. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. Commitments Towards Convention Objectives and Implementation Issues in Armenia ...... 13 1.2. Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16191 Implementation Status & Results Armenia Social Investment Fund III (P094225) Operation Name: Social Investment Fund III (P094225) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 12 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 07-Oct-2014 Country: Armenia Approval FY: 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Armenia Social Investment Fund Key Dates Board Approval Date 26-Oct-2006 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-May-2009 Last Archived ISR Date 09-Feb-2014 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 20-Dec-2006 Revised Closing Date 31-Mar-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 06-May-2010 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objective of the Project is to support the Government's policy to raise the living standards of the poor and vulnerable groups through: (i) improving the quality and access, and increasing the coverage of community infrastructure and services in poor communities, and for the most vulnerable groups in response to critical needs; (ii) promoting complementary institutional capacity building at the community and municipal level so as to improve the quality and sustainability of community investments and service delivery, increase accountability, and enhance greater stakeholder empowerment at the local level; and (iii) creation of employment associatedwith the provision of community infrastructure and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment
    Final Draft ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment By Arusyak Ghukasyan and Astghine Pasoyan Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF BOXES .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................6 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................8 2 EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF ARMENIA’S DISTRICT HEAT SUPPLY SECTOR.....................................................................................................................................................................8 3 HEAT SUPPLY POLICY REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS .............................11 3.1 ARMENIA’S URBAN HEATING STRATEGY ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and Deportation of Azerbaijanis
    GENOCIDE AND DEPORTATION OF AZERBAIJANIS C O N T E N T S General information........................................................................................................................... 3 Resettlement of Armenians to Azerbaijani lands and its grave consequences ................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Iran ........................................................................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Turkey ................................................................................... 8 Massacre and deportation of Azerbaijanis at the beginning of the 20th century .......................... 10 The massacres of 1905-1906. ..................................................................................................... 10 General information ................................................................................................................... 10 Genocide of Moslem Turks through 1905-1906 in Karabagh ...................................................... 13 Genocide of 1918-1920 ............................................................................................................... 15 Genocide over Azerbaijani nation in March of 1918 ................................................................... 15 Massacres in Baku. March 1918................................................................................................. 20 Massacres in Erivan Province (1918-1920) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Armenian Social Investment Fund Procurement Plan for the Third Additional Financing 11-Sep-12 Expected Status (1 Expected Contract No Estimated price in Post/prior Bid active, 5- Level of Completeness Contract ID Description Type Method Invitation signing Contract price Contractor Ranking . AMD review Opening complet damege status Date date Public Disclosure Authorized Date ed) Overhaul of Vanand second school Complete 1 AR-029 building with placement of kindergarten, W NCB 107,994,056 post 23.05.12 22.06.12 Aug-12 AMD 100,916,460 1 "Baghramyanshin" OJSC 40-60% 2 phase 2 Marz of Armavir Installation of the heating system, completion of renovation of the Cultural Complete 2 AR-030 W Shopping 27,640,796 prior 20.08.12 03.09.12 Sep-12 20-40% - House in the village of Voskehat., marz phase 2 of Armavir Completion of construction of the 3 AT-070 kindergarten's second building and W NCB 129,374,620 post 12.04.12 12.05.12 Jul-12 AMD 118,703,686 1 "Araratshin" LLC 0-20% - Complete Public Disclosure Authorized warm passage in Ayntap, Marz of Ararat Reinforcement, overhaul of the music Complete 4 GQ-050 W NCB 129,846,221 post 28.07.12 29.08.12 Sep-12 20-40% 3 school in Martuni, Marz of Gegharqunik Construction of the daily run-off pond 5 GQ-052 and external water-pipe in Artsvanist, W NCB 57,716,442 post 01.09.12 02.10.12 Oct-12 20-40% - Complete Marz of Gegharqunik Overhaul of two buildings and the warm passages of the kindergarten in the Complete 6 GQ-053 village of Geghamavan, installation of W NCB 104,423,483 post 24.09.12 24.10.12 Nov-12 20-40%
    [Show full text]