DOCSLIB.ORG

Palouse Prairie Plants Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palouse Prairie Plants Brochure WhatIdentify plants. can youUnderstand do to help?the ESA. 1 Jessica’s aster (Symphyotrichum jessicae) photos: gerry queener You may have a Palouse Landowners will not face rare plants Prairie remnant on restrictions of their activities 2 Palouse goldenweed (Pyrrocoma liatriformis) photo: gina glenne your land if: on their property under 3 Palouse thistle (Cirsium brevifolium) photo: trish heekin the • The area has never federal or state laws if any 4 Broadfruit mariposa (Calochortus nitidus) photo: gerry queener been cultivated. Palouse Prairie plants are, 5 Spalding’s catchfly (Silene spaldingii) • It is steep and rocky or should become listed close-up photo: steve wirt; full plant photo: janice hill alouse with native wildflowers under the Endangered 6 Douglas’ clover (Trifolium douglasii) photo: janice hill and bunchgrasses (some- Species Act (ESA). If a P rairie times near hawthorns landowner is receiving 7 Arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata) photos: gerry queener or ponderosa pines). federal funding for an common plants 8 Prairie smoke (Geum triflorum) photo: gerry queener • Your habitat patch activity, the federal agency 9 Douglas’ brodiaea (Triteleia grandiflora) Pa treasure has some of the plants will work with U.S. Fish photos: gerry queener shown in this pamphlet. and Wildlife Service to 10 Sticky purple geranium on your land determine possible effects (Geranium viscosissimum) Ask for help. to listed plants. photo: gerry queener Contact one of the 11 Upland larkspur (Delphinium nuttallianum) agencies listed in Learn more! photo: gerry queener this pamphlet. • Palouse Prairie Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) • A conservation Foundation: illustration: clay fletcher professional will www.palouse help you identify prairie.org plants and learn what can be done to protect • If you wish further For morelatah information soil and water about conservation conservation district and funding: your site. information about moscow, id - 208-882-4960 palouse conservation district • Conservation actions Palouse Prairie plants, pullman, wa - 509-332-4101 may include careful their habitats, and how palouse rock lake conservation district control of invasive plants to conserve them, please st. john, wa - 509-648-3680 idaho department of fish and game, clearwater region and planting of native contact a conservation lewiston, id - 208-799-5010 species on your land. planner at an agency washington department of fish and wildlife st. john, wa - 509-648-3680 • State, federal and listed in this pamphlet. usda agricultural service center local technical assistance, These agencies can farm service agency/natural resources conservation service colfax, wa - 509-397-4301 as well as funding, are provide helpful u.s. fish and wildlife service available to help you upper columbia river office, spokane, wa - 509-891-6839 resources for you. snake river office, boise, id - 208-378-5243 with your stewardship DAHO of Palouse Prairie rare I cover photo: trish heekin F I E S M a private landowner guide H plants and habitats. landscape photos: janice hill & GA PRINTED MARCH 2008 the Palouse Prairie a treasure on your land Private landowners in were replaced by agricul- Residential development and southeast Washington and tural crops because the soils invasion by weedy plants further Idaho’s Panhandle know offered great farming threaten these remnants, reduc- rare plants their rolling hills of deep potential. By 1900, over ing their size and making them fertile soils and colorful 90 percent of the Palouse less connected. This isolates grassland meadows are Prairie had been converted remaining rare wildflower plant called the “Palouse Prairie.” populations and their pollinators 3 to agriculture. Today, less 1 At one time, native bunch- than one percent of the from one another. grasses such as Idaho fescue, historic prairie plant system 6 bluebunch wheatgrass, exists, in small patches Landowners who have remnants prairie junegrass, Sandberg called “remnants” that with sensitive and rare plants on bluegrass and dozens of occur on ground that is too their property own a treasure! different wildflowers rocky and steep to cultivate. blanketed the landscape. Remnants show a high If you own a Palouse Prairie 4 5 2 Low-growing shrubs, degree of plant and insect remnant with some of these especially snowberry and diversity, and their soils are plants, and you are interested rose, were also common. complex and carbon-rich. in helping to conserve these common plants An important Native The remnants are vital to valuable resources, there are American food source, a variety of species, such ways you can become a steward. the camas bulb, bloomed as grassland nesting birds By choosing to conserve your purple-blue across the low, and pollinating insects. treasure, you may be eligible for seasonally wet meadows Palouse Prairie remnants funding and technical 8 10 and swales. These historic contribute to the overall assistance for the restoration, “Palouse Prairie” plant health of this unique place. management and protection 7 communities eventually of Palouse Prairie remnants. 9 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 CREATING A WILDLIFE FRIENDLY YARD ......................................................................2 With Plant Variety Comes Wildlife Diversity...............................................................2 Existing Yards....................................................................................................2 Native Plants ......................................................................................................3 Why Choose Organic Fertilizers?......................................................................3 Butterfly Gardens...............................................................................................3 Fall Flower Garden Maintenance.......................................................................3 Water Availability..............................................................................................4 Bird Feeders...................................................................................................................4 Provide Grit to Assist with Digestion ................................................................5 Unwelcome Visitors at Your Feeders? ..............................................................5 Attracting Hummingbirds ..................................................................................5 Cleaning Bird Feeders........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon
    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah
    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report
    Appendix L US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report L. US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 WILDLIFE SPECIALIST REPORT.......................................................................................... 1 3 I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 4 II. PROJECT HISTORY .................................................................................................... 1 5 III. PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................. 2 6 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................ 2 7 V. ANALYSIS AREA ........................................................................................................ 4 8 VI. THREATENED, ENDANGERED, PROPOSED AND CANDIDATE SPECIES ....... 7 9 VII. USFS SENSITIVE SPECIES ON THE ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST ................. 14 10 A. Greater sage-grouse ................................................................................................ 29 11 B. Amphibians ............................................................................................................. 32 12 C. Birds ........................................................................................................................ 33 13 D. Fish .......................................................................................................................... 36 14 E. Plants ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Howell's Triteleia
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Howell’s Triteleia Triteleia howellii in Canada ENDANGERED 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION DES ENDANGERED WILDLIFE ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: Please note: Persons wishing to cite data in the report should refer to the report (and cite the author(s)); persons wishing to cite the COSEWIC status will refer to the assessment (and cite COSEWIC). A production note will be provided if additional information on the status report history is required. COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and status report on Howell’s triteleia Triteleia howellii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 16 pp. Douglas, G.W., and J.L. Penny. 2003. COSEWIC status report on Howell’s triteleia Triteleia howellii in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on Howell’s triteleia Triteleia howellii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-16 pp. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Rapport du COSEPAC sur la situation du tritéléia de la Howell (Triteleia howellii) au Canada Cover illustration: Howell’s triteleia — Line drawing from J. Pojar 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • (Largeflower Triteleia): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Triteleia grandiflora Lindley (largeflower triteleia): A Technical Conservation Assessment © 2003 Ben Legler Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project January 29, 2007 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2007, January 29). Triteleia grandiflora Lindley (largeflower triteleia): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/triteleiagrandiflora.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and the help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the References section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Colorado Natural Heritage Program for their generosity in making their files and records available. I also appreciate access to the files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, USDA Forest Service Region 2. The data provided by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database and by James Cosgrove and Lesley Kennes with the Natural History Collections Section, Royal BC Museum were invaluable in the preparation of the assessment. Documents and information provided by Michael Piep with the Intermountain Herbarium, Leslie Stewart and Cara Gildar of the San Juan National Forest, Jim Ozenberger of the Bridger-Teton National Forest and Peggy Lyon with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program are also gratefully acknowledged. The information provided by Dr. Ronald Hartman and B. Ernie Nelson with the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, Teresa Prendusi with the Region 4 USDA Forest Service, Klara Varga with the Grand Teton National Park, Jennifer Whipple with Yellowstone National Park, Dave Dyer with the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit E: Botanical and Wildlife Resources
    E5.0 BOTANICAL AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES This section on the terrestrial resources (plants and wildlife) associated with the Klamath Hydroelectric Project (Project) contains the following elements: • A description of the existing botanical and wildlife resources in the study area (see Figure E5.1-1) • A discussion of agency consultation related to terrestrial resources • Summaries of the studies conducted by PacifiCorp on wildlife and vegetation • A summary of proposed enhancement measures • A discussion of continuing impacts E5.1 HISTORICAL TERRESTRIAL RESOURCES The terrestrial resources in the Project vicinity historically have been affected by humans for a long period of time. Much of the information on Native American use of the Klamath River Canyon comes from the archaeological investigations conducted by Gleason (2001). Native Americans have been part of the Klamath River ecosystem for at least the last 7,500 years (Gleason, 2001). The Upland Takelma, Shasta, Klamath, and Modoc tribes all used various portions of the study area; the Yurok Tribe historically used the lands along the Lower Klamath River. Before settlement by Europeans, Native Americans affected terrestrial resources through clearing vegetation for villages; harvesting plants and animals for food, medicine, and other uses; and using fire to manage vegetation. The most intensive uses occurred close to the river. Apparently, many of the flat terraces in the canyon were used at one time or another as village- sized settlements. The existing Topsy Grade Road is near the site of a Native American trail. Beginning in about 1870, homesteaders established ranches in the Klamath River Canyon. Apparently, the canyon was mostly unoccupied by any Native American tribes after this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants
    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Plant Families and Common Wildflowers of the Wenatchee Watershed
    Introduction of Plant Families and Common Wildflowers of the Wenatchee Watershed Illustration used with permission by the author/publisher, Thomas J. Elpel’s Wildflowers-and-weeds http://www.wildflowers-and-weeds.com/Plant_Families/Patterns_in_Plants.htm Other sources: A Botanical Primer by Joe Arnett and Plants of Southern Interior British Columbia and the Inland Northwest by Parish, Coupe, and Lloyd Photos and text by Susan Ballinger Mustard Family, Brassicaceae (formerly Cruciferae) Radial Key Words: 4 petals and 6 stamens--4 tall and 2 short. symmetry Mustard Family Brassicaceae Radial Phoenicaulis cheiranthoides dagger-pod symmetry Family ID Traits: • 4 sepals • 4 petals – arranged like either “X” or “H” • 4 tall stamens, 2 short stamens • Seeds pods arranged like a spiral staircase – a raceme – • Pods split open from both sides- with a clear membrane in the middle Habitat: rocky, thin soils (lithosols) in shrub-steppe. 4 tall stamens, 2 short Perennial. Early spring bloomer Mustard Family Brassicaceae Radial Erysimum aspernum Cascade wallflower symmetry Habitat: dry, rocky soils in shrub-steppe. Family ID Traits: Plant biennial. Spring bloomer. • 4 sepals • 4 petals – arranged like either “X” or “H” • 4 tall stamens, 2 short stamens • Seeds pods arranged like a spiral staircase – a raceme – • Pods split open from both sides- with a clear membrane in the middle Liliaceae Lily Family Key Words: Flowers with parts in threes. Sepals and petals usually identical. Radial symmetry Liliaceae LILY Family Yellow bells Fritillaria pudica Liliaceae family has flower parts in 3s, parallel veins in leaves, usually petals & stamens look the same, 6 stamens, 3—parted stigma Stem: erect, unbranched.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanizing Flora of Portland, Oregon, 1806-2008
    URBANIZING FLORA OF PORTLAND, OREGON, 1806-2008 John A. Christy, Angela Kimpo, Vernon Marttala, Philip K. Gaddis, Nancy L. Christy Occasional Paper 3 of the Native Plant Society of Oregon 2009 Recommended citation: Christy, J.A., A. Kimpo, V. Marttala, P.K. Gaddis & N.L. Christy. 2009. Urbanizing flora of Portland, Oregon, 1806-2008. Native Plant Society of Oregon Occasional Paper 3: 1-319. © Native Plant Society of Oregon and John A. Christy Second printing with corrections and additions, December 2009 ISSN: 1523-8520 Design and layout: John A. Christy and Diane Bland. Printing by Lazerquick. Dedication This Occasional Paper is dedicated to the memory of Scott D. Sundberg, whose vision and perseverance in launching the Oregon Flora Project made our job immensely easier to complete. It is also dedicated to Martin W. Gorman, who compiled the first list of Portland's flora in 1916 and who inspired us to do it again 90 years later. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge all the botanists, past and present, who have collected in the Portland-Vancouver area and provided us the foundation for our study. We salute them and thank them for their efforts. We extend heartfelt thanks to the many people who helped make this project possible. Rhoda Love and the board of directors of the Native Plant Society of Oregon (NPSO) exhibited infinite patience over the 5-year life of this project. Rhoda Love (NPSO) secured the funds needed to print this Occasional Paper. Katy Weil (Metro) and Deborah Lev (City of Portland) obtained funding for a draft printing for their agencies in June 2009.
    [Show full text]