From: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (As "Issuer") 383 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10179 United States of America T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (As From: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (as "Issuer") 383 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10179 United States of America To: The Holders of Securities Copy: The Bank of New York Mellon (as "Principal Programme Agent") One Canada Square London E14 5AL United Kingdom The Bank of New York Mellon S.A./N.V., Luxembourg Branch (as "Paying Agent", "Transfer Agent" and "Registrar") Vertigo Building - Polaris 2-4 rue Eugène Ruppert L-2453 Luxembourg 23 June 2020 JPMorgan Chase & Co. EUR 100,000,000 30-Year Fixed Rate Notes (with Coupon Step-Up), due July 2044 (Restructured) (previously known as " EUR 100,000,000 30-Year Range Accrual Notes linked to the EUR/USD FX Rate, due July 2044") (the "Securities" or the "Notes") (Series: 2014-5634; ISIN: XS1061529779) Structured Products Programme for the issuance of Notes, Warrants and Certificates AMENDMENT NOTICE We refer to the Securities Note in respect of the Securities dated 23 November 2017 (the "Securities Note"). Any term used in this notice but not defined shall have the meaning as defined or specified in the Securities Note. Since the issuance of the Securities, it has been determined that the terms and conditions of the Securities as set forth in the Pricing Supplement in respect of the Securities dated 3 July 2014 shall be amended. We, with the consent of the sole Holder of 100 per cent. of the outstanding Securities, have made certain amendments as further described in the Letter to the Holders of the Securities dated 16 June 2020 (the "Amendments") to the terms and conditions of the Securities by way of the Amended and Restated Pricing Supplement dated 23 June 2020. The corresponding amendments to the introduction text on page 5 of the Securities Note and the "Contractual Terms" of the Securities on pages 6 to 20 of the Securities Note are reflected in the Amended and Restated Sections of the Securities Note dated the date hereof (as attached at the Schedule hereto), such that all double-underlined text will be inserted into, and all struck-out text will be deleted from, the relevant sections of the Securities Note. Such Amendments will be deemed to have been effective for all purposes with effect from the Issue Date of the Securities (being 7 July 2014), and shall be binding on all the Holders of the Securities. This notice shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, English Law. Yours faithfully J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. (as Issuer) By: 352543901/Ashurst (MJL/AMNG)/JR SCHEDULE AMENDED AND RESTATED SECTIONS OF THE SECURITIES NOTE Terms and Conditions of the Securities AMENDED AND RESTATED SECTIONS OF THE SECURITIES NOTE DATED _______________ 2020 (amending and restating the relevant sections of the Securities Note dated 23 November 2017) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SECURITIES The Terms and Conditions of the Securities shall comprise the General Conditions of the WarrantsNotes (as set out in the section entitled "General Conditions"), as completed and/or amended by the FX Linked Provisions (as set out in the section entitled "FX Linked Provisions"), and as completed and/or amended by the Contractual Terms immediately below. The FX Linked Provisions appearing on pages 113 to 118 are not applicable to the Securities and shall be disregarded. For the purposes of construing the General Conditions and the FX Linked Provisions, the Contractual Terms shall be deemed to be a "Pricing Supplement". The Securities shall be subject to an amended and restated agency agreement (as amended and/or supplemented and/or restated as at the date hereof, the "Programme Agency Agreement") dated 23 April 2020 between JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, J.P. Morgan Structured Products B.V., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., The Bank of New York Mellon and the other agents named therein, notwithstanding that the Securities themselves are governed by the General Conditions and that the General Conditions refer to a previous version of the Programme Agency Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, each Holder of the Securities is deemed to acknowledge and agree that the Securities shall not have the benefit of the deed of covenant dated 23 April 2020 (as amended and/or supplemented and/or restated as at the date hereof, the "Deed of Covenant") given by the Issuer in relation to securities cleared through Euroclear Bank SA/NV, Clearstream Banking, société anonyme, and the Deed of Covenant shall not apply in respect of such Securities (including following an Event of Default). Contractual Terms CONTRACTUAL TERMS PART A – ISSUE TERMS 1. Issuer: JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2. (i) Series Number: 2014-5634 (ii) Tranche Number: One 3. Specified Currency or Currencies: Euro, as defined in General Condition 30.1 ("EUR") 4. Notes, Warrants or Certificates: Notes 5. Aggregate Nominal Amount: (i) Series: EUR 100,000,000 (ii) Tranche: EUR 100,000,000 6. Issue Price: 100 per cent. (100%) of the Aggregate Nominal Amount The Issue Price specified above may be more than the market value of the Securities as at the Issue Date, and the price, if any, at which the Dealer or any other person is willing to purchase the Securities in secondary market transactions is likely to be lower than the Issue Price. In particular, where permitted by applicable law, the Issue Price may take into account amounts with respect to commissions relating to the issue and sale of the Securities as well as amounts relating to the hedging of the Issuer's obligations under the Securities and secondary market prices may exclude such amounts If any commissions or fees relating to the issue and sale of the Securities have been paid or are payable by the Dealer to an intermediary, then such intermediary may be obliged to fully disclose to its clients the existence, nature and amount of any such commissions or fees (including, if applicable, by way of discount) as required in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to such intermediary, including Contractual Terms any legislation, regulation and/or rule implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive 2004/39/EC), or as otherwise may apply in any non-EEA jurisdictions Investors in the Securities intending to invest in Securities through an intermediary (including by way of introducing broker) should request details of any such commission or fee payment from such intermediary before making any purchase hereof (i) Specified Denomination: EUR 1,000,000 (ii) Trading in Units (Notes): Not Applicable (iii) Minimum trading size: The Securities may only be traded in a minimum initial amount of one Security (corresponding to a nominal amount of EUR 1,000,000) and, thereafter, in multiples of one Security (corresponding to a nominal amount of EUR 1,000,000) 7. Issue Date: 7 July 2014 8. Maturity Date: 7 July 2044 PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO NOTES PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTEREST (IF ANY) PAYABLE 9. Interest Commencement Date: For purposes of paragraph 10 (Fixed Rate Note Provisions) below, 7 July 2014 (the "Fixed Interest Commencement Date"), and, for purposes of paragraph 13 (Variable Linked Interest Provisions) below, 7 July 2024 (the "Variable Interest Commencement Date")In respect of: (a) each Interest Payment Date falling on or before 7 July 2024, the Issue Date; and (b) each Interest Payment Date falling after 7 July 2024, 7 July 2024 10. Fixed Rate Note Applicable (for the period from, and including, the Fixed Interest Provisions: Commencement date to, but excluding, the Variable Interest Contractual Terms Commencement Date) (i) Rate(s) of Interest: In respect of: (a) each Interest Payment Date falling on or before 7 July 2024, 4.35 per cent. (4.35%) per annum payable annually in arrear (; and (b) each Interest Payment Date falling after 7 July 2024, 5.40 per cent. (5.40%) per annum payable annually in arrear, in each case, subject as provided in (iii) below) (ii) Interest Payment Date(s): The Interest Payment Dates in respect of the Fixed Coupon Amounts shall be the 7th day of7 July ofin each calendar year commencing onfrom, and including, 7 July 2015 and ending onto, and including, 7 July 2024, (each a "Fixed Rate Interest Paymentthe Maturity Date" and together, the "Fixed Rate Interest Payment Dates") (iii) Fixed Coupon Amount(s): In respect of: (a) each Interest Payment Date falling on or before 7 July 2024, EUR 43,500 per EUR 1,000,000 in nominal amount (; and (b) each Interest Payment Date falling after 7 July 2024, EUR 54,000 per EUR 1,000,000 in nominal amount, and for the avoidance of doubt, the amount of interest payable on each Fixed Rate Interest Payment Date shall be the Fixed Coupon Amount) (iv) Broken Amount(s): Not Applicable (v) Day Count Fraction (General Actual/Actual (ICMA) Condition 4.1): (vi) Interest Determination Date(s): Not Applicable (vii) Other terms relating to the method Not Applicable of calculating interest for Fixed Rate Notes: Contractual Terms 11. Floating Rate Note Not Applicable (for the period from, and including, the Variable Provisions: Interest Commencement Date to, but excluding, the Maturity Date) 12. Zero Coupon Note Provisions: Not Applicable 13. Variable Linked Interest Provisions: Not Applicable 13. (i) Type of Interest: FX Linked Interest (ii) Provisions for determining Rate of As specified in Part C Interest or Interest Amount where calculated by reference to Share/Index/Commodity/FX Rate: (iii) Interest Determination Date(s): Not Applicable (iv) Interest Payment Dates: The Interest Payment Dates shall be each of (i) the 7th day of July of each calendar year commencing on, and including, 7 July 2025 and ending on, and including, 7 July 2043, and (ii) the Maturity Date (each a "Variable Interest Payment Date" and together, the "Variable Interest Payment Dates") (v) Provisions for determining Rate of As specified in paragraph 44 and Part C Interest or Interest Amount where below calculation by reference to Share/Index/ Commodity/FX Rate is impossible or impracticable or otherwise disrupted: (vi) Day Count Fraction: Actual/Actual (ICMA) 14.
Recommended publications
  • Seagram Building, First Floor Interior
    I.andmarks Preservation Commission october 3, 1989; Designation List 221 IP-1665 SEAGRAM BUIIDING, FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; 375 Park Avenue, Manhattan. Designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe with Philip Johnson; Kahn & Jacobs, associate architects. Built 1956-58. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1307, Lot 1. On May 17, 1988, the landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Seagram Building, first floor interior, consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; and the proposed designation of the related I.and.mark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Twenty witnesses, including a representative of the building's owner, spoke in favor of designation. No witnesses spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters in favor of designation. DFSCRIPI'ION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Seagram Building, erected in 1956-58, is the only building in New York City designed by architectural master Iudwig Mies van der Rohe. Constructed on Park Avenue at a time when it was changing from an exclusive residential thoroughfare to a prestigious business address, the Seagram Building embodies the quest of a successful corporation to establish further its public image through architectural patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Service Offering
    BUILDING ENVELOPE CONSULTANTS 40 WORTH STREET. #814 NEW YORK. NY 10013 SURFACEDG.COM 212.757.5659 ABOUT US...................................................................................1 Scope of Services.............................................................3 People..............................................................................5 NEW CONSTRUCTION Sample Projects.............................................................13 Services..........................................................................23 MONITORING & INSPECTION Services..........................................................................27 RESTORATION, LANDMARKS & HISTORIC PRESERVATION Sample Projects.............................................................29 Services..........................................................................43 ABOUT US SURFACE DESIGN GROUP provides comprehensive exterior envelope design and construction expertise to projects of all sizes across a wide range of market sectors. We are known for our hands-on approach and our ability to help realize the design intent within the budget and project schedule, while mitigating our client’s risk. Our services range from design-assist of complex specialty structures to historic facade restoration. Our mission is to provide a real world approach to facade consulting and are committed to developing personalized relationships with each and every one of our clients. The partners of our company collectively have over 150 years of experience. They have designed and
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Times, Thursday, January 17, 2019 Zm1
    C M Y K Axxx,2019-01-17,ZM,001,Bs-4C,E1 THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2019 ZM1 ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT THE REAL ESTATE BOARD OF NEW YORK Photo: Getty Images Getty Photo: This special advertising feature is sponsored by participating advertisers. The material was prepared by T Brand Studio and did not involve the news or editorial stas of The New York Times. ©2019 The New York Times C M Y K Axxx,2019-01-17,ZM,002,Bs-4C,E1 ZM2 THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2019 ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT NEW YORK CITY’S COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET Photo: Getty Images Getty Photo: As the New York real estate industry gathers for the Real Estate Board of New York’s (Rebny) 123nd Annual Banquet, the industry is enthusiastic about its success in 2018 and is looking forward to a strong 2019. This success — bolstered by job growth, as well as unemployment and crime rates at historic lows — is attracting the country’s leading entrepreneurs and technological innovators. Generating billions in annual tax revenue that funds vital city ser- vices, New York City’s real estate industry remains the engine behind the city’s economy. “As the Real Estate Board of New York celebrates its 123rd year, we are proud to report that Rebny is just as vibrant as the city itself,” said John H. Banks, president, Rebny. John H. Banks “Rebny’s outlook for the city’s future is an optimistic one,” he President, Rebny continued, “as our industry helps to guide the city forward with advocacy to advance sensible urban planning, responsible devel- opment and environmental sustainability to keep New York the greatest city in the world.” the Bronx,” said Banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources
    Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the potential of the proposed actions to impact urban design and visual resources. As defined in the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, urban design is the totality of components that may affect a pedestrian’s experience of public space. A visual resource can include views of the waterfront, public parks, landmark structures or districts, or otherwise distinct buildings, and natural resources. The following analysis considers a 400-foot study area around the proposed Vanderbilt Corridor which includes the One Vanderbilt site. The study area considers where the proposed actions would be most likely to influence land use patterns and the built environment (see Figures 7-1 and 7-2).1 This analysis also considers longer views to the One Vanderbilt site, including views along West 42nd Street, from Bryant Park, and from Gantry Plaza State Park in Long Island City, Queens. This analysis addresses the urban design and visual resources of the study area for existing conditions, the future without the proposed actions (the No-Action Condition), and the future with the proposed actions (With-Action Condition) for the 2021 Build year, when the proposed One Vanderbilt development is expected to be completed and occupied. Based on the CEQR Technical Manual, a preliminary assessment of urban design and visual resources is appropriate when there is the potential for a pedestrian to observe, from the street level, a physical alteration beyond that allowed by existing zoning. Examples include projects that permit the modification of yard, height, and setback requirements, and projects that result in an increase in built floor area beyond what would be allowed “as‐of‐right” or in the No-Action condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Building Industry
    OUTSTANDINGWBC Outstanding Women 2015 WOMEN IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY OUTSTANDING WOMEN IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY 2015 OUTSTANDING WOMEN IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY www.wbcnyc.org/outstandingwomen2015 OUTSTANDING1 CELEBRATING OUTSTANDING WOMEN 2015 The indelible signature of outstanding professionals in any industry is marked by distinction, excellence and superior performance. Outstanding Women are a special breed. They demonstrate passion, perseverance and tenacity to overcome challenges that others may consider too onerous or too risky to surmount. They do it every day, without fanfare or recognition. Women Builders Council is proud to recognize women who represent top professionals in their respective market sectors of real estate, construction, transportation and related professions. These women serve as outstanding role models and sterling examples of professionals who every day are making their mark in their own careers as well as impacting the lives of others. Many are young, others are more mature. Their distinguishing common denominator is the quality of professionalism that they deliver to their companies and organizations in the highly competitive and high risk business arena of construction. 2 Deborah Bradley President, Women Builders Council, Inc. Founder and President, Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc. BUILDING A NEW FAMILY OF WOMEN BUILDERS Congratulations to the Women Builders Council Outstanding Women of 2015! On behalf of the Board of Women Builders Council, it is my pleasure and privilege to extend my sincere congratulations to WBC’s 2015 Outstanding Women. Each of the women recognized by WBC this year is very special and represents the new face of the building industry. In their very own way, and with their own stories, each of these women has risen through the ranks of their companies and organizations to attain a special level of distinction among their colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan 20110208 Received
    FORM 2 CORPORATE SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER NOTICE Notice pursuant to s. 324 of Part XV of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) Form for use by a corporation giving notice of : (i) First acquiring an interest in 5% or more of the shares of a listed corporation (I.e. first becoming a substantial shareholder); (ii) Changes in the percentage level, or nature, of its interest or its short position in such shares; and (iii) Ceasing to have an interest of 5% in such shares (complete Boxes 1 to 19 and 27 only). This Form must be completed in accordance with the directions and instructions in the Notes to Form 2. 1. Name of listed corporation HSBC Holdings PLC 2. Stock code 5 4. Number of issued shares in class 3. Class of shares Ordinary Shares 17,706,158,819 5. Name of substantial shareholder 8. Business registration number JPMorgan Chase & Co. N/A 9. Place of incorporation Certificate of Incorporation No. United States 13-2624428 (Tax ID#) 6. Registered office 10. Contact person 270 Park Avenue, New York 10017, USA Xu XiuPing 11. Daytime tel. No. 12. e-mail address 6568821913 [email protected] 7. Principal place of business in Hong Kong 13. Exchange on which listed N/A New York Stock Exchange 14. Name of listed parent and exchange on which parent is listed N/A 16. Date when the substantial shareholder became aware 15. Date of relevant event of the relevant event/ interest in the shares (if later) 08 02 2011 09 02 2011 (day) (month) (year) (day) (month) (year) 17.
    [Show full text]
  • SEAGRAM BUILDING, INCWDING the PIAZA, 375 Park Avenue, Manhattan
    I.andrnarks Preservation Corrnnission October 3, 1989; resignation List 221 IP-1664 SEAGRAM BUILDING, INCWDING THE PIAZA, 375 Park Avenue, Manhattan. resigned by I.udwig Mies van der Rohe with Philip Johnson; Kahn & Jacobs, associate architects. Built 1956-58. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1307, Lot 1. On May 17, 1988, the I.andrnarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a I.andrnark of the Seagram Building including the plaza, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1) . The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the pro­ visions of law. 'IWenty-one witnesses, including a representative of the building's owner, spoke in favor of designation. No witnesses spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters in favor of designation. DFSCRIPI'ION AND ANALYSIS Surrnna:ry The Seagram Building, erected in 1956-58, is the only building in New York City designed by architectural master I.udwig Mies van der Rohe. carefully related to the tranquil granite and :marble plaza on its Park Avenue site, the elegant curtain wall of bronze and tinted glass enfolds the first fully modular modern office tower. Constructed at a time when Park Avenue was changing from an exclusive residential thoroughfare to a prestigious business address, the Seagram Building embodies the quest of a successful corporation to establish further its public image through architectural patronage. The president of Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Samuel Bronfman, with the aid of his daughter Phyllis I.arnbert, carefully selected Mies, assisted by Philip Johnson, to design an office building later regarded by many, including Mies himself, as his crowning work and the apotheosis of International Style towers.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Avenue Braces for 2M Sf of Empty Office Space Citibank, Major League Baseball Plan to Move in Next Few Years
    Park Avenue braces for 2M sf of empty office space Citibank, Major League Baseball plan to move in next few years August 22, 2016 http://therealdeal.com/2016/08/22/park-avenue-braces-for-2m-sf-of-empty-office-space/ From left: 277 Park Avenue, 270 Park Avenue, 299 Park Avenue and 425 Park Avenue It may get a whole lot easier to find office space on Park Avenue pretty soon, as a series of upcoming departures is set to leave landlords with roughly 2 million square feet to fill. The vacancies — courtesy of tenants like Citibank, Major League Baseball and others — could impact 10 percent of the office submarket, which stretches from East 45th to East 59th streets, Crain’s reported. In addition to Citibank and MLB, other major tenants are weighing their options, including investment firm BlackRock, which could leave its 700,000 square foot digs at 345 Park and 40 East 52nd Avenue and move to Hudson Yards or the World Trade Center when its lease expires in 2023. JPMorgan Chase, meanwhile, is planning to leave its 300,000­square­foot digs at 277 Park in order to consolidate at 270 Park and 383 Madison Avenue.”What you’re seeing is a migration to newer product,” said CBRE’s Mary Ann Tighe. “The age of these buildings is catching up to them.” According to data from Cushman & Wakefield, Park Avenue offices have an average age of 55.6 years, and many have lower ceilings and structural columns. Meanwhile, many finance companies — which currently occupy roughly 70 percent of Park Avenue’s 22 million square feet of space — are weighing smaller spaces in light of shrinking profits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 2Nd Quarter
    Northeast U.S.—2Q 2001 Volume 64 Regional Review The National Real Estate Index extends its deepest sympathies and condolences to the victims of the World Trade Center, his QUARTERLY focuses on ten markets in the Pentagon and Pennsylvania tragedies and their families and Northeast along the Atlantic seaboard. Raleigh- friends. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the rescue Durham and Charlotte led the region in population T workers, medical personnel and other professionals and citizens growth with respective gains of 38.9% and 29% between who have come to the aid of those affected by the situation. 1990 and 2000. Job growth in nine of these markets sur- passed the 0.3% national average between the second quar- ters of 2000 and 2001. Washington, DC had the highest job gain (3.1%) and the lowest unemployment rate (2.8%). Central New Jersey’s proximity to New York contributed to Philadelphia, on the other hand, saw virtually no jobs added a 6.8% annual increase in rents for CBD office space. during the year. Baltimore and Northern New Jersey had the Boston also saw a significant rental gain at 5.7%. Boston highest unemployment rates at 4.8% each. topped the list for suburban office value gains (9.1%) fol- lowed by Northern New Jersey (6%). Conversely, Downtown Manhattan reaped the highest appreciation in CBD Philadelphia saw its suburban office space depreciate 4.4%. office values with a 13% uptake between June 2000 and June As for the industrial sector, no northeastern market regis- 2001. Sadly, this market was dealt a traumatic blow, in terms tered a price gain at or above the annual 4% benchmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Evaluation
    REQUEST FOR EVALUATION Address: 445 PARK AVENUE Location: Block 1311 Lot 1 Name: 445 Park Avenue Architect: Kahn & Jacobs Constructed: 1946-1947 Summary: The first post-war office building on Park Avenue – and the first fully air-conditioned commercial structure in New York City – 445 Park Avenue set the stage for future development along Park Avenue. The prominent architecture firm Kahn & Jacobs, architects of the Landmarked Municipal Asphalt Plant (1941-44), designed this building. The rectilinear glass and limestone structure, with its dark granite base, is composed of four setbacks, adhering to the 1916 zoning law. Continuous ribbon windows and limestone spandrel panels give the building a sleekness in stark contrast to its contemporary buildings. Lever Brothers Company, Schweppes, Ford Motor Company, Monsanto Chemical Company, and Universal Pictures Corporation all leased space in the structure in the 1940s. 1 REQUEST FOR EVALUATION Address: 450 PARK AVENUE Location: Block 1292 Lot 37 Name: former Franklin National Bank Building Architect: Emery Roth & Sons Constructed: 1968-1972 Summary: This 33-story skyscraper has been called “the handsomest black skyscraper in the city.” 450 Park Avenue served as the headquarters of the Franklin National Bank from 1972-74, and its sleek black façade and dark glass set it apart from other structures on Park Avenue, especially those designed by Emery Roth & Sons in the previous decades. The building has a smooth façade treatment composed of “black granite” (likely gabbro or diabase) and graceful elliptical window segments of gray-tinted glass. Following the 1961 zoning resolution, the architects designed a privately owned public space on the west side of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan C. Hernandez, PE, SECB
    Jonathan C. Hernandez, PE, SECB EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Manila, Philippines Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 1982 LICENSES Registered Professional Civil Engineer in New York, California, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada, Texas, Washington, Virginia, Ohio and the Philippines. PROFESSIONAL Past-President, Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY); Member, ASSOCIATIONS SEER Committee Certified in the Practice of Structural Engineering, Structural Engineering Certification Board (SECB) Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Member, American Concrete Institute (ACI) Member, The Architectural League of New York Member, CoreNet Global Member, Vertical Construction Business Practice Committee of American Council of Engineering Companies New York Metro Region (ACEC-NY) Member, 2018 Code Revision Managing Committee of New York City Department of Buildings (representing SEAoNY) Member, SEER Committee of National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (representing SEAoNY); Past Member of Board of Directors 2015-2017 Member, Healthcare Committee of New York Building Congress EXPERIENCE GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK May 2000 to Present PARTNER Staten Island University Hospital Central Utility Plant - Staten Island, NY GMS is working with Northwell Health to design a new 12,000 sf Central Utility Plant building with new chillers, boilers, pumps, switchgear, cooling towers and generators. The new building will be built on piles. 12 West 48th Street – New York, NY GMS is providing structural engineering services for this new 24,000 sf, 4 to 5 story building plus cellar retail building with three solid walls and a detailed curtainwall at storefront. Tom Ford, 680 Madison Avenue – New York, NY GMS is providing structural engineering services for the renovation of this retail space on upper Madison Avenue in NYC.
    [Show full text]