The End of Angkor?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The End of Angkor? The Modification and Re-use of Angkor Wat David Brotherson 2011 A thesis submitted as partial requirement for the fulfilment of a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in the Department of Archaeology at the University of Sydney, Australia. For my parents Abstract Angkor Wat, the largest religious monument in the world, was built in the mid 12th century AD and has been continuously occupied ever since. Angkor Wat was the jewel in the crown of Greater Angkor, the capital of the Khmer Empire. Over 800 years have passed since its construction and during this long period the context of Angkor Wat and Greater Angkor has changed significantly. Once the capital of the Khmer Empire, in the 15th and 16th centuries as the apparatus of the state moved to the Southeast, Greater Angkor came to be on the periphery of the Khmer world. In a similar manner, as Khmer society changed, the originally Vaisnavite temple Angkor Wat came to be hallowed by Theravada Buddhist monks. Throughout these political and social changes Angkor Wat itself has changed – the temple features modifications which postdate the original construction phase. The fourth enclosure wall is one such component which has undergone several modifications. The wall, which clearly demonstrates more than one construction phase, is covered in several thousand postholes. The postholes, which are located along the upper part of the inside face and on top of the wall, have never been studied before. This thesis seeks to answer two questions: 1) What was the purpose of the postholes?, and 2) When were the postholes made? To answer these questions the postholes were surveyed. The results of a detailed survey show that the distribution of and relationship between the postholes is consistent over a considerable distance. The relationship between the postholes and the construction phases of the wall establishes a relative chronology. The nature of the modifications to the wall and the location of the postholes indicate that they were supports for the framework of a defensive platform and palisade. The absolute date of these defensive works is as yet unknown, however the likely historical context suggests they were installed sometime between the late 16th century and the early 17th century AD. i Statement of Authorship The research described in this thesis, except where referenced, is the original work of the author and was a discrete project supervised by Prof. Roland Fletcher. This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis presented by me for another degree or diploma. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. David Brotherson 2011 ii Acknowledgements – Many thanks... Being a latecomer to the study of Archaeology (and the Arts in general) there are many factors which have led me to the accomplishment of this thesis, and credit must be given where it is due. First of all I would like to thank Professor Roland Fletcher. Unaware of how I wanted to pursue my Honours thesis I am indebted to Professor Fletcher for offering me this task in the first place. Initially, the process of surveying the enclosure wall of Angkor Wat seemed nothing short of a Herculian labour but what had originally seemed so daunting evolved into a truly enjoyable experience. Roland’s wealth of experience and near limitless enthusiasm for this project has made a world of difference. Furthermore, the resources of the Greater Angkor Project which were left at my disposal were instrumental in making this dissertation what it has come to be. Special thanks I owe to Dr Mitch Hendrickson took me along the long, bumpy road to Preah Khan of Kompong Svay and showed me the ropes in the field, as well as providing much sought after advice during the research process. Equally I am indebted to Dr Christophe Pottier, whose decades of experience and encyclopaedic knowledge of all things Angkorian is a force with which to be reckoned. Likewise I owe my thanks to Dr Damian Evans, Dr Georgie Lloyd and Dr Dougald O’Reilly, all of whom made my stay and studies in Cambodia that much more productive and enjoyable. Special thanks to Dr Martin Polkinghorne who liaised and organised additional field surveys around Angkor while I was in absentia. I also extend gratitude to Gabrielle Ewington, Luke Benbow and Till Sonnemann for much thought provoking discussion, especially Gabrielle for her knowledge of Middle Period matters and Till for opening the discussion on the issue of cannon warfare. Thanks also to Dr Martin King for his technical assistance and to Dr Andrew Wilson for making my experience with ArcGIS a marginally less frustrating ordeal1. A special mention goes to Dr Wayne Johnson, who aside from being a most informative and “off the beaten path” tour guide around Siem Reap, introduced me to the wonders of Angkor, wonders of which I confess to being ignorant until I took his class on European colonialism in 2nd year (2006). My fieldwork at Angkor Wat would not have been possible without the hard work, competence and bilingual talents of Kasper Hanus, Suy Pov and Han Chenda. Likewise my experiences in Cambodia would have been lacking if it were not for the friendship and experience of Dr Phon Kaseka, Chan Sovichetra and So Malay. In addition, this year would have been significantly duller without the friendship and group therapy to be found in the Honours class social club (past and present). Thanks also to all my friends from the various contexts of my life – you guys made the whole process bearable by listening to me carry on about postholes. Finally, I need to thank my family. For my Mum, Dad, and brother Gavin I have the utmost love and respect. Thank you for having the patience to see me through this long and winding journey. All good things to those who wait, right? PS - It would be rude of me if I didn’t thank that ancient, inquisitive, anonymous ancestor of ours who took the time to find just the right combination of water, hops, malt and yeast – and then proceeded to let it sit for a couple of weeks. That seminal body of research made the writing up of this project all the more amicable. Whoever you are – I salute you! 1 Seriously though, thank you Andrew. iii Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements – Many thanks... ....................................................................................... iii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. x 1. Angkor Wat – A Monumental Puzzle ................................................................................ 1 The Problem – The Postholes ................................................................................................. 5 Misconceptions ....................................................................................................................... 7 Change and Continuity ........................................................................................................... 7 Walls = Defence Mechanisms? ............................................................................................... 8 Thesis Outline ....................................................................................................................... 10 2. Angkor Wat in Context .................................................................................................... 11 The Khmer State ................................................................................................................... 11 Ancestry ............................................................................................................................ 11 Foundation ........................................................................................................................ 15 The Formation and Layout of the Capital - Greater Angkor ............................................. 15 State Structure and Operations ........................................................................................ 17 Labour and Resources ................................................................................................... 18 Temple Construction ..................................................................................................... 18 Angkorian Religions ...................................................................................................... 19 Angkor Wat .......................................................................................................................... 21 The Later History of Angkor ................................................................................................. 22 Conclusions........................................................................................................................... 24 3. Boundaries: Function and Form ...................................................................................... 25 The Global Perspective – The Boundary’s Function............................................................. 25 Separation and Ordering of Space ...................................................................................