Environment and Culture: a Study of Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment and Culture: a Study of Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE: A STUDY OF PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN THE EASTERN HIGHLANDS OF ZIMBABWE By Seke Katsamudanga A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE MARCH 2007 To my Parents ABSTRACT There is always a symbiotic relationship between the physical environment and cultural behaviour of a society. The physical environment provides resources and options for subsistence, raw materials for economic development, landforms and landscapes that may later be imbued with iconic, associative, symbolic or religious values. Understanding the environmental conditions in particular cultural landscapes at particular periods may explain aspects of cultural behaviour of communities, especially settlement locations. This research is an investigation of the nature of the prehistoric culture-environment relationship in Zimunya, in the central part of the eastern highlands of Zimbabwe. The eastern highlands form a distinct physiographic region of Zimbabwe, and should have required or led to particular technological and cultural adaptations of the prehistoric communities that lived in it throughout the ages. The results of this investigation show that there are patterns in the distribution of the archaeological settlements in the research area. A statistical investigation of the sites indicates that some of them are associated with particular aspects of the physical environment. Stone Age settlement sites are found on the hills that dot the gently undulating plains and along river valleys of the research area. They are also in close proximity to quartz outcrops, the quartz of which was apparently exploited as raw material for tool manufacturing. Sites of the farming communities occur in various situations, although sites with pit structures are located on the northern slopes of the upland areas of the Vumba mountains. Although sociological factors could have been significant, the detected patterns appear to be the result of the influence of the physical attributes of the landscape such as topography, proximity to water sources and climatic conditions. Key words: climate, environment, Eastern Highlands, GIS, palaeo-climate, settlement patterns, spatial archaeology, statistical analysis, Zimunya TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ...........................................................................................................................v List of Plates............................................................................................................................vii List of Tables......................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................xvi CHAPTER 1 ...........................................................................................................................22 The archaeology of eastern Zimbabwe: Background and research problems ......................22 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................22 1.2 Research aims and objectives.....................................................................................24 1.3.0 The research area: physical geography ...................................................................29 1.3.1. Climate..............................................................................................................32 1.3.2. Geology and Soils ............................................................................................36 1.3.3. Drainage............................................................................................................39 1.3.4. Vegetation.........................................................................................................39 1.3.5. Fauna.................................................................................................................42 1.4 Previous archaeological research ...............................................................................44 1.5 Overview of the cultural sequence in eastern Zimbabwe..........................................48 1.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................63 CHAPTER 2 ...........................................................................................................................65 Theory and method of spatial archaeology ............................................................................65 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................65 2.2. Environment and culture: a review of global trends.................................................65 2.3 Spatial archaeology in Zimbabwe..............................................................................78 2.4 A general review of criticisms of spatial studies .......................................................83 2.5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................91 CHAPTER 3 ...........................................................................................................................93 Strategy and methods of data recovery and analytical techniques ........................................93 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................93 3.2 Methodological approaches: an overview .................................................................93 3.3 Archaeological settlement sites: Definitions .............................................................99 3.4.0 Desktop research....................................................................................................103 3.4.1 Archaeological sites ........................................................................................103 3.4.2 Significance of environmental variables selected ..........................................104 3.5 Archaeological Surveys............................................................................................106 3.5.1 Survey design ..................................................................................................106 3.5.2 Sampling techniques .......................................................................................108 3.5.3 Site documentation..........................................................................................112 3.5.4 Site cultural period ..........................................................................................112 3.5.5 Site type ...........................................................................................................114 3.5.6 Site ranking......................................................................................................114 3.6 Analytical techniques ...............................................................................................115 3.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................116 CHAPTER 4 .........................................................................................................................118 Archaeological Surveys ........................................................................................................118 4.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................118 4.2 Sites Recorded ..........................................................................................................119 4.2.1 Stone Age sites ................................................................................................119 4.2.1.1 Stone artefacts ........................................................................................120 4.2.1.2 Rock paintings........................................................................................121 4.2.2 Farming Communities.....................................................................................126 4.2.2.1 Early Farming Communities .................................................................127 4.2.2.2 Later Farming Communities..................................................................128 4.2.2.3. Iron Working Sites................................................................................131 4.2.2.4 Pit Structures ..........................................................................................133 4.2.2.5 Grinding grooves and Tsoro Game Boards...........................................134 4.4.4.6 Tunnels ...................................................................................................136 4.3 Culture sequence and summary of survey results....................................................138 4.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................145 CHAPTER 5 .........................................................................................................................147 Culture History of Zimunya: Excavation data .....................................................................147 5.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................147
Recommended publications
  • A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 ICELAND as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 5 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 1 Property currently inscribed on the KINGDOM 4 1 the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miombo Ecoregion Areas of Biological Importance
    THE MIOMBO ECOREGION AREAS OF BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE J.R. Timberlake, F.P.D. Cotterill, P.J. Mundy, D.G. Broadley, B. Marshall, A.J. Gardiner & M. Fitzpatrick September 2001 (published 2018) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 21 THE MIOMBO ECOREGION: AREAS OF BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE J.R. Timberlake, F.P.D. Cotterill, P.J. Mundy, D.G. Broadley†, B. Marshall, A.J. Gardiner & M. Fitzpatrick September 2001 (revised February 2018) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 21 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Miombo Ecoregion: Areas of Biological Importance, page 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The maps were produced at the request of the Southern Africa Programme Office of the WorldWide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO) under their Miombo Ecoregion project, funding for which was provided by WWF US. Particular thanks are due to the Regional Representative, Harrison Kojwang, and to the Programme Officer, Fortune Shonhiwa, who ran the project. We also wish to thank Heather Whitham in the Biodiversity Foundation for Africa for administrative support. The GIS versions of the maps, originally drawn manually, were digitised at the University of Botswana's Harry Oppenheimer Okavango Research Centre in Maun, Botswana, with financial support from Conservation International through their Wilderness Programme. Particular thanks are due to Mike Murray-Hudson and Leo Braak for making this possible. Final GIS maps were designed, drawn and checked by Ed Lim (Eastbourne, UK). Each map was compiled by a BFA specialist, with the
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Community Forestry in Mozambique and Zimbabwe
    Cadastral Politics: the Making of Community Forestry in Mozambique and Zimbabwe1 by David McDermott Hughes Department of Human Ecology Rutgers University 55 Dudley Road New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA tel: +1-732-932-9153 ext. 361 fax: +1-732-932-6667 email: [email protected] Presented to the biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 31 May – 4 June 2000. 1 Institutional support and funding were provided by the Centre for Applied Social Sciences (Univ. of Zimbabwe), by the Direcção Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia (Mozambique), by the Centro de Informação e Educação para o Desenvolvimento (Mozambique, Italy), by the Committee on African Studies of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies (with Funds provided by the Rockefellor Foundation), by the MacArthur Foundation, and by the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation (Univ. of California). For advice on the manuscript, I thank Sharad Chari, Elizabeth Colson, Frank Hirtz, Louise Fortmann, Christine Hastorf, James McCarthy, Melanie Hughes McDermott, Donald Moore, Benjamin Orlove, and Janet Sturgeon. The paper also benefited from discussion following presentations to the Yale Univ. School of Forestry, Rutgers Univ. Department of Human Ecology, and Univ. of California, Berkeley Environmental Politics Working Group. Shared credit, however, does not alleviate me of full blame for mistakes herein. Parts of this article have already appeared in Hughes (1998) and Hughes (1999). High hopes have obscured thorny problems in community forestry. Also known as community based resource management, the policy (or policies) is fast becoming a blueprint for Southern Africa’s flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report
    MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo December 2001 (published 2011) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 WWF - SARPO MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT 2001 (revised August 2011) by Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe PREFACE The Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report was commissioned in 2001 by the Southern Africa Regional Programme Office of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO). It represented the culmination of an ecoregion reconnaissance process led by Bruce Byers (see Byers 2001a, 2001b), followed by an ecoregion-scale mapping process of taxa and areas of interest or importance for various ecological and bio-physical parameters. The report was then used as a basis for more detailed discussions during a series of national workshops held across the region in the early part of 2002. The main purpose of the reconnaissance and visioning process was to initially outline the bio-physical extent and properties of the so-called Miombo Ecoregion (in practice, a collection of smaller previously described ecoregions), to identify the main areas of potential conservation interest and to identify appropriate activities and areas for conservation action. The outline and some features of the Miombo Ecoregion (later termed the Miombo– Mopane Ecoregion by Conservation International, or the Miombo–Mopane Woodlands and Grasslands) are often mentioned (e.g. Burgess et al. 2004). However, apart from two booklets (WWF SARPO 2001, 2003), few details or justifications are publically available, although a modified outline can be found in Frost, Timberlake & Chidumayo (2002). Over the years numerous requests have been made to use and refer to the original document and maps, which had only very restricted distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk
    H @ R 2008 –2010 ICOMOS W ICOMOS HERITAGE O RLD RLD AT RISK R EP O RT 2008RT –2010 –2010 HER ICOMOS WORLD REPORT 2008–2010 I TAGE AT AT TAGE ON MONUMENTS AND SITES IN DANGER Ris K INTERNATIONAL COUNciL ON MONUMENTS AND SiTES CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL DES MONUMENTS ET DES SiTES CONSEJO INTERNAciONAL DE MONUMENTOS Y SiTIOS мЕждународный совЕт по вопросам памятников и достопримЕчатЕльных мЕст HERITAGE AT RISK Patrimoine en Péril / Patrimonio en Peligro ICOMOS WORLD REPORT 2008–2010 ON MONUMENTS AND SITES IN DANGER ICOMOS rapport mondial 2008–2010 sur des monuments et des sites en péril ICOMOS informe mundial 2008–2010 sobre monumentos y sitios en peligro edited by Christoph Machat, Michael Petzet and John Ziesemer Published by hendrik Bäßler verlag · berlin Heritage at Risk edited by ICOMOS PRESIDENT: Gustavo Araoz SECRETARY GENERAL: Bénédicte Selfslagh TREASURER GENERAL: Philippe La Hausse de Lalouvière VICE PRESIDENTS: Kristal Buckley, Alfredo Conti, Guo Zhan Andrew Hall, Wilfried Lipp OFFICE: International Secretariat of ICOMOS 49 –51 rue de la Fédération, 75015 Paris – France Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Cultural Affairs and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag EDITORIAL WORK: Christoph Machat, Michael Petzet, John Ziesemer The texts provided for this publication reflect the independent view of each committee and /or the different authors. Photo credits can be found in the captions, otherwise the pictures were provided by the various committees, authors or individual members of ICOMOS. Front and Back Covers: Cambodia, Temple of Preah Vihear (photo: Michael Petzet) Inside Front Cover: Pakistan, Upper Indus Valley, Buddha under the Tree of Enlightenment, Rock Art at Risk (photo: Harald Hauptmann) Inside Back Cover: Georgia, Tower house in Revaz Khojelani ( photo: Christoph Machat) © 2010 ICOMOS – published by hendrik Bäßler verlag · berlin ISBN 978-3-930388-65-3 CONTENTS Foreword by Francesco Bandarin, Assistant Director-General for Culture, UNESCO, Paris ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Zimbabwe Guided Safari
    Wild Zimbabwe Small Group Escorted Tour This 11 night/12 day escorted tour of Zimbabwe departs with a minimum of two people. Beginning in Harare, highlights include the Eastern Highlands, the Great Zimbabwe Ruins, Matobo and Hwange National Parks, and Victoria Falls. The tour is all-inclusive with no hidden extras. Day 1: Harare On arrival in Harare you will be met and transferred to Casa Kadiki Guest House (or Bronte Hotel, depending on availability) for 1 night including dinner and breakfast. Casa Kadiki Guesthouse This small, discreet owner-run guesthouse is set in a quiet suburb of Harare. 11 attractively decorated en-suite rooms lead onto verandas overlooking the gardens. All day tea and coffee making facilities are available and breakfast is a choice of continental and/or cooked. There is also a lovely swimming pool and a small bar. The facilities are good (modern TVs in the rooms and free wireless internet). Your Financial Protection All monies paid by you for the air holiday package shown [or flights if appropriate] are ATOL protected by the Civil Aviation Authority. Our ATOL number is ATOL 3145. For more information see our booking terms and conditions. Days 2 & 3: Eastern Highlands, Nyanga Depart Harare after breakfast for the beautiful Eastern Highlands. After 3-4 hours on the road, you'll arrive at Troutbeck Lodge in Nyanga, your home for the next two nights (full board). Troutbeck Inn You would be forgiven for thinking that you had arrived in the Scottish Highlands on your first visit to Troutbeck Inn. The colonial home, with its manicured gardens and small golf course, is evocative of a distant era of Zimbabwe's history.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapungubwe and the Origins of the Zimbabwe Culture Author(S): Thomas N
    South African Archaeological Society Mapungubwe and the Origins of the Zimbabwe Culture Author(s): Thomas N. Huffman Source: Goodwin Series, Vol. 8, African Naissance: The Limpopo Valley 1000 Years Ago (Dec., 2000), pp. 14-29 Published by: South African Archaeological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3858043 Accessed: 29-08-2017 14:34 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms South African Archaeological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Goodwin Series This content downloaded from 196.42.88.36 on Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:34:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 14 South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Series 8: 14-29, 2000 MAPUNGUBWE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE ZIMBABWE CULTURE* THOMAS N. HUFFMAN Department of Archaeology University ofthe Witwatersrand Private Bag 3 Wits 2050 E-mail: 107arcl(dlcosmos. wits. ac.za ABSTRACT Advances in the calibration of radiocarbon dates (Vogel et al 1993) in particular have resolved critical chronological Class distinction and sacred leadership characterised issues. The the Zimbabwe culture sequence can now be divided Zimbabwe culture, the most complex society in precolonial into three periods, each named after important capitals: southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Nature Spirits: the Political Ecology of Power and Progress in Rural Zimbabwe
    CONVERSATIONS WITH NATURE SPIRITS: THE POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF POWER AND PROGRESS IN RURAL ZIMBABWE Georgina McAllister1 & Zeddy Chikukwa2 Summary In this essay, we present a discussion between a community activist and a political ecologist who reconnected high in Zimbabwe’s remote Eastern Highlands, drawn together by Cyclone Idai, the most devastating to ever have hit Zimbabwe. The breath-taking backdrop to our discussion belies the hidden, but no-less dramatic, erosion of bio-cultural diversity, knowledge and social connection shaped by the colonial project since the end of the nineteenth century. This effectively paved the way for the persistence of coercive power relations into independence, and their tangible effects - land grabbing and livelihood loss, structured poverty and dependence, leaving people chronically exposed to disasters, political opportunism and conflicts. In this context, farming approaches that reconnect people to one another and their landscape are seeking to make meaning, restore collective agency, and heal the scars left by societies’ most destructive tendencies. Yet the coercive, and sometimes violent environments, where these approaches are being re-imagined are rarely conducive to connectivity and healing. Our discussion explores the spirits that inhabit the natural world, the mixed blessings of a crisis, and its capacity to create moments of reflection within which to re-imagine our world afresh. Introduction In picking our way through the complexities of this remote place, this first disembodied voice comes from a so-called ‘rational’ political ecology perspective to both narrate the context, and explore how power shapes our relationship with the environment and each other; while the second embodied voice – italicised - comes from a ‘more-than-human’ perspective that is embedded, and wholly invested, in a traditionalism that holds the tripartite relationships between people, ecology and spirit world as sacred.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 World Heritage
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 ICELAND 5 3 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H 25 E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authoritiess.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Study of the Zimbabwe Culture Capital of Khami, South-Western Zimbabwe
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE ZIMBABWE CULTURE CAPITAL OF KHAMI, SOUTH-WESTERN ZIMBABWE TAWANDA MUKWENDE University of Cape Town Supervisor: Associate Professor Shadreck Chirikure Co-Supervisor: Associate Professor Simon Hall Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology University of Cape Town 2016 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town ABSTRACT This study sought to understand the archaeology of the Zimbabwe Culture capital of Khami through synchronic and diachronic analyses of its material culture. The research employed a number of methodological approaches that included a review of historic documents, surveying and mapping, excavations, museum collection analysis, and artefact studies, in order to collect datasets from various sections of the site, including the walled and the non- walled areas. The main indication is that there is a great deal of similarity in material culture distribution across the whole site. An analysis of objects by stratigraphic sequence exposes continuity and change in local and imported objects. Dry stone-wall architectural data suggests that the site was constructed over a long period, with construction motivated by a number of expansionary factors. The study confirms that Khami began as a fully developed cultural unit, with no developmental trajectory recorded at Mapungubwe or Great Zimbabwe, where earlier ceramic units influenced later ones.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Horse Press
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Schmidt, Heike. "'Penetrating' Foreign Lands: Contestations Over African Landscapes. A Case Study from Eastern Zimbabwe." Environment and History 1, no. 3, Zimbabwe special issue (October 1995): 351–76. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/2861. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 1995. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. ‘Penetrating’ Foreign Lands: Contestations Over African Landscapes. A Case Study from Eastern Zimbabwe. HEIKE SCHMIDT Humboldt University at Berlin Philosophische Fakultät III Afrika-Institut Unter den Linden 6 D-10099 Berlin SUMMARY While it was happening, European expansion was often legitimised by evoking frontier images: pioneers setting off from the metropolis, penetrating wilderness in order to open access to resources, like minerals, living-space, and fertile lands. Central to the ideology of the frontier is the notion of ‘no-man’s land’. These ‘pioneers’, however, often had to face local inhabitants and their interpretations and uses of this land. Thus it will be argued that contestations over landscape were at the same time battles over the legitimation of European expansion, as well as over local perceptions of this process. Ideologically, contestations by Europeans and Africans become apparent in the sexualisation of landscape. This paper is based on the case study of a Valley in eastern Zimbabwe on the border with Mozambique, and more specifically of two tea estates which were established in the rainforest.
    [Show full text]