Joan Beaumontandelizabeth Hopton
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thomas, Lord Stanley by Michael Iliffe
Thomas, Lord Stanley by Michael Iliffe Thomas Lord Stanley was the son of Thomas, 1st Baron Stanley. The 1st baron was a younger son of Cheshire gentry who had been elevated to the peerage. Thomas, his son, became the 2nd Baron Stanley at his father’s death in 1459, and in 1461 became Chief Justice of Cheshire. In 1472 he married Eleanor, the sister of Richard Neville (“the kingmaker”). They had four sons that we know of; George, Edward, Edmund and James. George was to become Lord Strange, James joined the Church, Edward and Edmund played no part in the politics of the time. Lord Stanley’s brother, William, later became Sir William Stanley. After the death of his wife, Eleanor, he married Margaret Beaufort in 1482, and became the step-father of Henry Tudor, son of Edmund Tudor, the Duke of Richmond, who died in 1458. Margaret was the daughter of John, 1st Duke of Somerset; she brought him great wealth, and a wife of breeding and accomplishment. Thomas and Margaret had no children together. During the personal rule of Henry VI, Lord Stanley became Controller of the Royal Household, and in times of crisis the court looked to him to provide troops in the North-West. Stanley’s greatest danger came in 1459, when Queen Margaret made a bid to recruit him directly in Cheshire, when the Yorkists were mobilising and sought assistance from the Stanleys. To add to his dilemma, his father died that year, leaving the 24 year old Thomas to weather the storm. At the Battle of Blore Heath that year, young Stanley played a game of brinkmanship and held his retinue and levies some miles from the encounter. -
TIES of the TUDORS the Influence of Margaret Beaufort and Her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership
TIES OF THE TUDORS The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership P.V. Smolders Student Number: 1607022 Research Master Thesis, August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. Liesbeth Geevers Leiden University, Institute for History Ties of the Tudors The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership. Pauline Vera Smolders Student number 1607022 Breestraat 7 / 2311 CG Leiden Tel: 06 50846696 E-mail: [email protected] Research Master Thesis: Europe, 1000-1800 August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. E.M. Geevers Second reader: Prof. Dr. R. Stein Leiden University, Institute for History Cover: Signature of Margaret Beaufort, taken from her first will, 1472. St John’s Archive D56.195, Cambridge University. 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 3 Introduction 4 1 Kinship Networks 11 1.1 The Beaufort Family 14 1.2 Marital Families 18 1.3 The Impact of Widowhood 26 1.4 Conclusion 30 2 Patronage Networks 32 2.1 Margaret’s Household 35 2.2 The Court 39 2.3 The Cambridge Network 45 2.4 Margaret’s Wills 51 2.5 Conclusion 58 3 The Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership 61 3.1 Margaret’s Reputation and the Role of Women 62 3.2 Mother and Son 68 3.3 Preserving Tudor Rulership 73 3.4 Conclusion 76 Conclusion 78 Bibliography 82 Appendixes 88 2 Abbreviations BL British Library CUL Cambridge University Library PRO Public Record Office RP Rotuli Parliamentorum SJC St John’s College Archives 3 Introduction A wife, mother of a king, landowner, and heiress, Margaret of Beaufort was nothing if not a versatile women that has interested historians for centuries. -
A New Wife for Edward, 3Rd Earl of Derby Em
WILLIAM ;,,it> A NEW WIFE FOR EDWARD, 3RD EARL OF DERBY EM. Zevin, M.A., M.Phil. For a long time there has been some uncertainty over the identity of the first wife of Edward Stanley, third earl of Derby. Probably the earliest extant biographical account of this earl is the Funeral Certificate prepared by the College of Arms following his death in 1572.' It states that, out of three wives, 'He marryed firste Dorothie, dowter to Thomas Howard Duke of Northfolk, and by her had yssue his sone and successour.' More than one of the sixteenth-century Howard dukes of Norfolk carried the name Thomas. Thomas Howard the elder, the second duke of Norfolk, died in 1524. He was succeeded by his eldest son, Thomas Howard the younger, who then became the third duke of Norfolk. As the earl of Derby's first marriage took place around 1530, it is possible that his bride could have been the daughter of either one of these men. The antiquarian histories of the Stanley family generally follow the Funeral Certificate and are also unspecific as to which duke of Norfolk was the father of Earl Edward's first wife.2 The standard peerages, however, indicate not only that Edward's wife was the daughter of the second duke of Norfolk, but also that her mother was the duke's second wife, Agnes.' If we then look up the entries on the dukes of Norfolk, we find that this identification of the bride's parents is backed up solely by Collins' Peerage.' Here, one Dorothy, the second daughter of the second duke of Norfolk by his second wife, is listed as having married the earl of Derby. -
Tna Prob 11/95/237
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/95/237 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the last will and testament, dated 14 February 1598 and proved 24 April 1600, of Oxford’s half-sister, Katherine de Vere, who died on 17 January 1600, aged about 60. She married Edward Windsor (1532?-1575), 3rd Baron Windsor, sometime between 1553 and 1558. For his will, see TNA PROB 11/57/332. The testatrix’ husband, Edward Windsor, 3rd Baron Windsor, was the nephew of Roger Corbet, a ward of the 13th Earl of Oxford, and uncle of Sir Richard Newport, the owner of a copy of Hall’s Chronicle containing annotations thought to have been made by Shakespeare. The volume was Loan 61 in the British Library until 2007, was subsequently on loan to Lancaster University Library until 2010, and is now in the hands of a trustee, Lady Hesketh. According to the Wikipedia entry for Sir Richard Newport, the annotated Hall’s Chronicle is now at Eton College, Windsor. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Newport_(died_1570) Newport's copy of his chronicle, containing annotations sometimes attributed to William Shakespeare, is now in the Library at Eton College, Windsor. For the annotated Hall’s Chronicle, see also the will of Sir Richard Newport (d. 12 September 1570), TNA PROB 11/53/456; Keen, Alan and Roger Lubbock, The Annotator, (London: Putnam, 1954); and the Annotator page on this website: http://www.oxford-shakespeare.com/annotator.html For the will of Roger Corbet, see TNA PROB 11/27/408. -
The Other W.S., William Stanley, Sixth Earl of Derby
The Other W.S., William Stanley, Sixth Earl of Derby John Raithel n the following, I hope to provide a reasonable summary of the evidence I that I believe points to William Stan- ley, the sixth earl of Derby, as the author of the works generally attributed to Shake- speare. I do not intend, of course, to pre- sent all the material here, but do hope to give a reasonable history of the Derbyite conviction, and in so doing point to some of the sources, compilers, and interpreters of this information, and then bring it up to date with recent discoveries and publica- tions. Beginning with the referenced works, I believe the interested reader will find much to flesh-out the skeleton sketched here. There are good reasons for suspecting that the traditional assignation of the authorship of Shakespeare’s works is misplaced. These are based on statements made about the works at the time of their appearance, evidence concerning the traditional candidate, and inferences derived from the works themselves. There are also good reasons for suspecting the true author to be William Stanley, the sixth earl of Derby. Some of these, too, are based on statements made about the author of the works, and inferences derived from the works themselves. And some are based on evidence concerning William Stanley. None of the statements, evidence, or inferences is conclusive—for Stanley or anyone else—or there would be no controversy. The case for Derby is made by examining the available material and attempting to weight it appropriately, assigning, for example, less weight to inferences drawn from the plays by a Derbyite—where there must be a natural bias toward interpreting the evidence in support of Derby—and more weight to a contemporary’s comments about the author, or to modern research by a non-Derbyite scholar. -
Stanley Families.Pdf
FAMILY ENTER All DATA IN THIS ORDER: NAMES: WATSON, John Henry Vv GROUP DATES: 14 Apr 1794 PI ACES: Shoron. Windir, Vt ^ RECORD To indicate that a child is an ancestor of the family representative, place an "X" behind the number pertaining to th^child. 1 0) 10$ •ni" 2*9 SB o 112 2 C H- 5«1 s ^ >C® 22* c ">3:2 3 »2 ®- -=5 • a D n PJ 2Si o (A > a w s® c T 5> 2 S» m ®2 ^ « JO - 2 ? O D o e\ (A b *5- >N > Z > 2 I <s Z n E "" 0 '0 a h 'A s V ??g is Q N r* 5 N ^ c < N I 0 2 5 b Z a 5^ > - Z = V cn s h- is > , > c> I; 21 OC HCA in ZD PICA Pl> a az D (ri i: : :h > ' ' Z th 1 i > N I IL nv < $ s zl 0 m Z 2 lO 0\ u- FAMILY ENTER ALL DATA IN THIS^RDER: V, ^ ^NAMES: WATSON. John Henry GROUP DATES: 14 Apr 179^ y ^ ^ ^lACES: Shoron. Windsr, Vl ^ RECORD To indicate that a child it an ancestor of the family representative, place an "X" behind the number pertaining to that child. XO^ o» o n 5 i "n ■r\: >1 X ms " CH- >!l >c® a o (on -tm =1 o m PJ znl T® (A _ *ri > a w i® c 7 "(ri m 2 ®z O a - N 2 ? O 0 (A > 1 (A V. z ~ n i V n I X "N ei' > s N a ds <$> 2 Is r> 9D H. -
Tna Prob 11/27/408
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/27/408 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the will, dated 27 November 1538 and proved 1 February 1539, of Roger Corbet (1501/2 – 20 December 1538), ward of John de Vere (1442-1513), 13th Earl of Oxford, and uncle of Sir Richard Newport (d. 12 September 1570), the owner of a copy of Hall’s Chronicle containing annotations thought to have been made by Shakespeare. The volume was Loan 61 in the British Library until 2007, was subsequently on loan to Lancaster University Library until 2010, and is now in the hands of a trustee, Lady Hesketh. According to the Wikipedia entry for Sir Richard Newport, the annotated Hall’s Chronicle is now at Eton College, Windsor. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Newport_(died_1570) Newport's copy of his chronicle, containing annotations sometimes attributed to William Shakespeare, is now in the Library at Eton College, Windsor. For the annotated Hall’s Chronicle, see also the will of Sir Richard Newport (d. 12 September 1570), TNA PROB 11/53/456; Keen, Alan and Roger Lubbock, The Annotator, (London: Putnam, 1954); and the Annotator page on this website: http://www.oxford-shakespeare.com/annotator.html FAMILY BACKGROUND For the testator’s family background, see the pedigree of Corbet in Burke, John, A Genealogical and Heraldic History of the Commoners of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. III, (London: Henry Colburn, 1836), pp. 189-90 at: https://archive.org/stream/genealogicalhera03burk#page/188/mode/2up See also the pedigree of Corbet in Grazebrook, George, and John Paul Rylands, eds., The Visitation of Shropshire Taken in the Year 1623, Part I, (London: Harleian Society, 1889), Vol. -
MORETON CORBET Written Primarily by Barbara Coulton 1989
MORETON CORBET Written primarily by Barbara Coulton 1989 EARLY HISTORY There has been a settlement at Moreton at least since Saxon, even Roman times and it lies on the Roman road from Chester to Wroxeter. The Domesday Book (1086) records that Moreton was held by Thorold, from whom it was held by Hunning and his brother since before 1066. Another Saxon family, that of Thoret, came to have Moreton, under Robert fitz Turold. In the time of his descendant, Peter fitz Toret, the chapel at Moreton - a subsidiary of the church of St Mary at Shawbury (a Saxon foundation) - was granted, with St Mary's and its other chapels, to Haughmond Abbey, c. 1150. The north and south walls of the present church may date back to this time. Charters of Haughmond were attested by Peter fitz Toret and his sons, the second of whom, Bartholomew, inherited Moreton Toret, as it was then known. Witnesses to a charter of 1196 include Bartholomew de Morton and Richard Corbet of Wattlesborough, a small fortress in the chain guarding the frontier with Wales. He was a kinsman of the Corbets of Caus Castle, barons there from soon after the Norman conquest; Richard Corbet held Wattlesborough from his kinsman, owing him knight service each year, or when a campaign made it necessary. Richard Corbet married Bartholomew's daughter Joanna, heiress of Moreton, and their son, another RICHARD CORBET, inherited both Wattlesborough and Moreton. He married Petronilla, Lady of Booley and Edgbolton; their son ROBERT CORBET was of full age and in possession of his estates by 1255. -
Ancestors of Mary NOBLE Mary NOBLE John NOBLE Michael
Ancestors of Mary NOBLE Philip Le YONGE b: Abt 1295 in Ludlow, , Shropshire, England Geoffrey (Galfridus) YONGE m: Abt 1319 in Staffordshire, b: Abt 1320 in Worcester, , England Worcestershire, England Ranulph DE MESCHINES m: Abt 1344 in Worcestershire, b: Abt 1070 in Briquessart , , Livry, England France Cecilia IPSTONES d: Jan 1129 in Chester, , Cheshire, Thomas YONGE Urian DE ST. PIERRE John DE ST. PIERRE William DE ST. PIERRE Johans DE ST. PIERRE William DE ST. PIERRE England b: Abt 1345 in Charnes, , b: Abt 1300 b: Abt 1236 in Shocklach, , b: Abt 1211 in Chepstow, , b: Abt 1181 in Chepstow, , b: Abt 1143 in Chepstow, , b: Abt 1103 in Chepstow, , Flaald De DOL Cheshire, England Monmouth, Wales Monmouth, Wales Monmouth, Wales Monmouth, Wales Staffordshire, England John DE ST. PIERRE b: Abt 1005 in Dol, Ille-Et-Vilaine, St m: Abt 1374 in Worcestershire, b: Abt 1255 in Oulton, , Suffolk, Malo, Bretagne, France England Alan Fitzflaald Senescal Of England Lucia OF MERCIA d: Aft 1064 in Dol, Ille-Et-Vilaine, St Urian DE ST. PIERRE m: Abt 1259 in Dutton, , Cheshire, DOL d: Aft 1389 b: Abt 1070 in Licolnshire, England Malo, Bretagne, France b: 12 May 1278 in Shocklach, , England Idonea MALPAS b: 1025 in Dol, Ille-Et-Vilaine, St Cheshire, England b: Abt 1238 in Malpas, , Cheshire, David le CLERK Flaald Fitzalan Dapifer Of Malo, Bretagne, France m: Abt 1280 in Ross on Wye, , England DOL d: Aft 1080 Richard YONGE Margaret or Edith ST. Herefordshire, England b: Abt 1046 in Dol, Ille-Et-Vilaine, St Alan FITZFLAALD Mrs. -
The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648
The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Worton, Jonathan Citation Worton, J. (2015). The royalist and parliamentarian war effort in Shropshire during the first and second English civil wars, 1642-1648. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Download date 24/09/2021 00:57:51 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/612966 The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of The University of Chester For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jonathan Worton June 2015 ABSTRACT The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Jonathan Worton Addressing the military organisation of both Royalists and Parliamentarians, the subject of this thesis is an examination of war effort during the mid-seventeenth century English Civil Wars by taking the example of Shropshire. The county was contested during the First Civil War of 1642-6 and also saw armed conflict on a smaller scale during the Second Civil War of 1648. This detailed study provides a comprehensive bipartisan analysis of military endeavour, in terms of organisation and of the engagements fought. Drawing on numerous primary sources, it explores: leadership and administration; recruitment and the armed forces; military finance; supply and logistics; and the nature and conduct of the fighting. -
Webb, Nigel (2004)
Webb, Nigel (2004) Settlement and integration in Scotland 1124-1214: local society and the development of aristocratic communities: with special reference to the Anglo-French settlement of the South East. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3535/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Settlement and Integration in Scotland 1124-1214. Local Society and the Development of Aristocratic Communities: With Special Reference to the Anglo-French Settlement of the South East. Nigel Webb Ph.D. Department of Medieval History The University of Glasgow December 2004 Acknowledgements lowe my biggest debt of gratitude to my supervisors Professor David Bates and Dr. Dauvit Broun for their support and unfailing belief, patience and enthusiasm over the years. I am also indebted to my friend Anthony Vick for his invaluable help in charter Latin during the early years of my work. I also owe an enormous debt of gratitude to my wife's parents William and Shelagh Cowan not only for their support, but also for their patient proof reading of this thesis. -
STANWARDINE HALL Stanwardine-In-The-Wood, Shropshire
'. ,.., .... ~r . , :.. - .C"~ . ... .' STANWARDINE HALL Stanwardine-in-the-Wood, Shropshire ',- HISTORIC BUILDING REpORT GARRy MILLER :'ARCHITECIURAL HISTORIAN " . ~.' '. ~. ..' . ~ ..: . 4", Stsnwsrdine HaJJ:Historic Building Report -2 Contents 1: Rationale Page 3 2: Historical background Page 8 3: Plan and construction Page 15 4: Exterior Survey Page 21 '"-" 5: Interior Survey Page 29 6: Roof- Structure and Attic Page 42 7: The Evolution of Stanwardine Hall Page 45 8: The Farm Buildings Page 50 Appendices Page 56 Plates Stanwardine HaD:Historic Building Report -4 1.1 Introduction STANW.AR.DINE Hall is the ancient manor house of Stanwardine-in-the-Wood, near Ellesmere, Shropshire: a large gentry residence built and rebuilt over a lengthy period from the mid-16mto the early 17m century. Its builders at this time were a new branch of the Corbet family whose principal seat was Moreton Corbet Castle near Shawbury. To celebrate the founding of this line - or perhaps to gloss over its newness - the mansion was conceived on a grand scale. However, the building we see txxlay is only a fraction of what once stood there and what remains of it - and indeed what doesn't - has experienced a particularly complex history. Its first 150 years are punctuated by restless change and adaptation. The hall was initially built in timber-frame. Then in the early 17m century, it was rebuilt in brick and stone with a number of additions. After a quieter interlude, it experienced a considerable trauma in the first decade or so of the IS· century when approximately a third of the structure, in the form of a wing, was pulled down.