Download William Jenyns' Ordinary, Pdf, 1341 KB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download William Jenyns' Ordinary, Pdf, 1341 KB William Jenyns’ Ordinary An ordinary of arms collated during the reign of Edward III Preliminary edition by Steen Clemmensen from (a) London, College of Arms Jenyn’s Ordinary (b) London, Society of Antiquaries Ms.664/9 roll 26 Foreword 2 Introduction 2 The manuscripts 3 Families with many items 5 Figure 7 William Jenyns’ Ordinary, with comments 8 References 172 Index of names 180 Ordinary of arms 187 © 2008, Steen Clemmensen, Farum, Denmark FOREWORD The various reasons, not least the several german armorials which were suddenly available, the present work on the William Jenyns Ordinary had to be suspended. As the german armorials turned out to demand more time than expected, I felt that my preliminary efforts on this english armorial should be made available, though much of the analysis is still incomplete. Dr. Paul A. Fox, who kindly made his transcription of the Society of Antiquaries manuscript available, is currently working on a series of articles on this armorial, the first of which appeared in 2008. His transcription and the notices in the DBA was the basis of the current draft, which was supplemented and revised by comparison with the manuscripts in College of Arms and the Society of Antiquaries. The the assistance and hospitality of the College of Arms, their archivist Mr. Robert Yorke, and the Society of Antiquaries is gratefully acknowledged. The date of this armorial is uncertain, and avaits further analysis, including an estimation of the extent to which older armorials supplemented contemporary observations. The reader ought not to be surprised of differences in details between Dr. Fox and the present author. They will certainly be resolved amicably as our analysis is completed. INTRODUCTION The armorial of 1611 items known as William Jenyns’ Ordinary (WJ, WJO), not to be confused with Thomas Jenyns’, belong to the small group of medieval ordinaries, emerging during the 1330’es. Though many armorials have smaller fragments, into which coats-of-arms appear to have been grouped according to their principal features, only four have been extensively organized to be used as a key for extracting information. And of the four, three have been shown to be interelated and largely dependent on the Ashmolean Roll (AS, ASM, c.1334, 489 items). The three are: Cooke’s Ordinary (CKO, 1334-1340, 646 items), Cotgrave’s Ordinary (CG, CGO, c.1340, 556 items), and Thomas Jenyns’ Roll, part I (TJ, QMJ, 1340-1440, 1259 items). The latter obviously include a majority of items that are independent of the Ashmolean, and more than one source must have been available to its editor. Apart from the common questions of organisation, dating and identification of the individual arms and bearers, we may add the questions whether the William Jenyns’ is also dependent on the Ashmolean and what other surces may have been used – or perhaps we might be so lucky as to find that this would be a primary collation of personal arms organized into an ordinary. The late Garter king-of-arms Sir Anthony Wagner made a cursory examination of the manuscripts (CEMRA 69) and proposed that both contents and execution of the primary manuscript were c.1380, i.e. late in the reign of Edward III (r.1326-1377) or during the minority of Richard II (r.1377-1399). The date proposed by Wagner appeared plausible, but it was soon evident that the date had to be pushed back to accommodate several key figures. So for a working hypothesis, most of the individuals were supposed to have been active around 1360, and the evaluation was made accordingly. The recurring term ‘not identified’ simply indicate that no contemporary written evidence have been found for an individual in the references consulted. Apart from the discussion in the following chapters and the comments on the individual items, the reader is left to draw his own conclusions from text and references as to whether the individual in question is likely to be contemporary (i.e. living around 1360), belong to an earlier armorial or might be a later insert. In 2 many families the eldest son was regularly given his father’s first name, which in connection with the approximate dating of the armorial and the individual entries mean that an item might as well be for an (unmentioned) father or eldest son of the person proposed in the comment. For reasons of time, effort and expense, the references consulted are mainly those available in print at the Royal Library in Copenhagen. This includes most standard works and the calendared official documents, but excludes local histories, some collections of seals and most genealogical studies, which are in practice only available in major english libraries. Only a few of the Victoria County History volumes have been consulted, due to weighing the time needed against the return expected, and that is also the case for most of the calendared series. Though a set of 3-letter standardized sigla, as proposed in Clemmensen OM, would be more appropriate for identifying the multitude of armorials and items mentioned here, most readers would already be accustomed to the sigla used for english armorials in most papers and in Papworth, Wagner’s CEMRA and the Dictionary of British Arms. Blazons significantly different from the item discussed are always marked with an asterisk (*), and has the first name of its legend noted, if present (or relevant). The spelling of names will appear erratic, as it must be when drawn from many references, and as with the dates, they have largely been left as encountered. The dates have, in general, not been checked for accuracy, but ought to be correct within a year, due to medieval practice of starting the year on the Annunciation (March 25th). THE MANUSCRIPTS The principal manuscript is Jenyns' Ordinary, held by the College of Arms in London, which is probably the original made by William jenyns, Lancaster Herald 1516-1527, who has his arms on fo. 26v and 42r. It was later owned by Sir Thomas Holland in 1562, William le Neve 'Clarenceux' 1635-1661, Peter le Neve 'Norroy 1712, and probably bought c.1885 by Henry F. Burke 'Garter' and presented to the College of Arms. It is made of vellum on 51 folio leaves (292 x 203 mm) with 16 arms per page (4x4) in rough artwork with legends very faded. The upper edge was cut on rebinding and the pagination is almost illegible. Fo.1rv with arms of the Holland family of Lincolnshire was added later. The second manuscript, London, Society of Antiquaries, Ms.664/9 roll 26 fo.1r-49r, is a Hatton- Dugdale facsimile, omitting ff.7-8 and has many unfinished and confounded legends, but otherwise excellent concordance with the principal manuscript. Illustrations are available in Bedingfeld H 55 (24v), Gwynn-Jones AH 87 (25r) and Fox CM (1r, 29v, 19r). The numeration is somewhat complicated as the 30 segments appear to have been designed with items 1-92 by row, 93-1611 by coloumn. The pages 4v-51v is presented as an ordinary of English arms. All items are here by column. The concordance (by row) between the manuscripts are: Items 1-44 CA / 33-76 SA, 45-76 / 1-32, 77-172 / 77-172, 173-236 / n.a. (1549-1611), and 237- 1611 / 173-1548. 3 Content by column in ms from Col.Arms (1) 1r Holand of lincs (2 b + 14s), = 1-16 = owner c.1560 (2) 1v saints & earls (16 banners), = 17-32 (3) 2r-4r kings , princes (10,9,9,16), = 33-92 = 2r electors, 2v+3r royal family, 3v+4r kings (4) 4v-14r lions, = 93-412 (5) 14v eagles, = 413-428 (6) 15r-16v pales & piles, = 429-483 (7) 16v escallops, = 484-492 (8) 17r-20v bars & fess, = 493-620 (9) 21r-22r saltires, = 621-668 (10) 22v garbs, = 669-684 (11) 23rv bougets, = 685-708 (12) 23v stars, = 709-716 (13) 24r-25r crescents, = 717-764 (14) 25v-26r roundels, = 765-784 (15) 26rv annulets, = 785-796 (16) 27rv bars & fess, = 797-844 (17) 28r-29r frets, = 845-892 (18) 29v maunches, = 893-908 (19) 30r-32v bars & fess, = 909-1004 (20) 33r-34v escutcheons = 1005-1054 (21) 34v fishes, = 1055-1068 (22) 35rv fusils, = 1069-1100 (23) 36r cinquefoils, = 1101-1116 (24) 36v-37r checky, = 1117-1148 (25) 37v-38r barry, = 1149-1168 (26) 38rv cinquefoils, = 1169-1196 (27) 39r maunches, = 1197-1200 (28) 39r-45r chevrons, = 1201-1401 (29) 45rv miscellaneous, = 1402-1420 (30) 46r-51v bends (largely unfinished); = 1421-1611 For Row-to-Column notation add X (below) to the by-row number to get the by-column nr. 03 6 9 -3 0 3 6 -6 -3 0 3 -9 -6 -3 0 4 FAMILIES WITH MANY ITEMS – a preliminary notice The Lucy families The 11 arms of the well known Lucy families [1057-1068] with many differences and first names ought to be easy, but they appear to be very select, repetitive and partly undocumented. Unfortunately, the pedigrees in the Genealogy Magazine N.S. 15:129-133 and in Essex Archaeol.Soc.Trans. N.S. vol 7 were not available, and identification is based on GEC and a few calendared documents. The treatment of the Lucy arms in Brault RAE 2:268-269 leaves the postulated changes of the field from gules to azure unexplained. Some fifty items from armorials temp. Edward I to Richard II and a few seals are available to support the identifications. There are three principal families, each with their own pattern of first names, and only connected through marriage. The Lucies of Charlecote with major holdings in Warwickshire and on the Wales-Gloucestershire march are probably present with William (d.c.1360) having Gules 3 lucies hauriant argent [1067] and the Gules a chevron engrailed argent between 3 lucies argent of John [1059] might well be for a cadet of this family.
Recommended publications
  • An Historical and Architectural Description of the Priory Church Of
    I The Author of this work is compelled, with much reluctance, to submit the following statement to the notice of his Subscribers—The work has been undertaken without any view of personal profit; and the amount of the subscriptions being intended only to cover the expense of publication, was at first fixed as low as possible, as will clearly appear from a comparison of the work with any other of a similar kind. In order more fully to illustrate the subject, the Plates have been increased from twelve, as was at first stipulated, to their present number,-and from this, and other causes, the expense of the work has much exceeded his previous calculations. To cover the additional charges, the prices of 6*. 6d. for Small Paper, and 13,. for Large Paper Copies would be requisite,-and, as the number of copies subscribed for, if taken at the original prices of 5s, and 10s. 6d , would subject him to considerable loss, he can only submit the case to the liberality of his Subscribers. » — — ; AN HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIORY CHURCH OF BRIDLINGTON, IN THE EAST RIDING O? THE COUNTY OF YORK. BY THE REV. MARMADUKE PRICKETT, M.A. OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. Prisca Ecclesiae nostra? fabrica et politeia absque Monasteriologia manca est. Marsham : Pref: in Dugd. Reliquiae san£ splendidae, qua3 quicunque intueatur et admiretur et aimul eomroisereatur. Camden. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED FOR T. STEVENSON; AND SOLD BY C. J. G. AND F. RIVINGTON, LONDON AND FORTH, AND FURBY, BRIDLINGTON. 1831, CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY W. METCALFE, ST. MARY'S STREET.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Painted and Described
    Yorkshire Painted And Described Gordon Home Project Gutenberg's Yorkshire Painted And Described, by Gordon Home This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Yorkshire Painted And Described Author: Gordon Home Release Date: August 13, 2004 [EBook #9973] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK YORKSHIRE PAINTED AND DESCRIBED *** Produced by Ted Garvin, Michael Lockey and PG Distributed Proofreaders. Illustrated HTML file produced by David Widger YORKSHIRE PAINTED AND DESCRIBED BY GORDON HOME Contents CHAPTER I ACROSS THE MOORS FROM PICKERING TO WHITBY CHAPTER II ALONG THE ESK VALLEY CHAPTER III THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO REDCAR CHAPTER IV THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER V Livros Grátis http://www.livrosgratis.com.br Milhares de livros grátis para download. SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER VI WHITBY CHAPTER VII THE CLEVELAND HILLS CHAPTER VIII GUISBOROUGH AND THE SKELTON VALLEY CHAPTER IX FROM PICKERING TO RIEVAULX ABBEY CHAPTER X DESCRIBES THE DALE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE CHAPTER XI RICHMOND CHAPTER XII SWALEDALE CHAPTER XIII WENSLEYDALE CHAPTER XIV RIPON AND FOUNTAINS ABBEY CHAPTER XV KNARESBOROUGH AND HARROGATE CHAPTER XVI WHARFEDALE CHAPTER XVII SKIPTON, MALHAM AND GORDALE CHAPTER XVIII SETTLE AND THE INGLETON FELLS CHAPTER XIX CONCERNING THE WOLDS CHAPTER XX FROM FILEY TO SPURN HEAD CHAPTER XXI BEVERLEY CHAPTER XXII ALONG THE HUMBER CHAPTER XXIII THE DERWENT AND THE HOWARDIAN HILLS CHAPTER XXIV A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF YORK CHAPTER XXV THE MANUFACTURING DISTRICT INDEX List of Illustrations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Décret Du 17 Février 2014
    21 février 2014 JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Texte 13 sur 111 Décrets, arrêtés, circulaires TEXTES GÉNÉRAUX MINISTÈRE DE L’INTÉRIEUR Décret no 2014-160 du 17 février 2014 portant délimitation des cantons dans le département du Calvados NOR : INTA1326779D Le Premier ministre, Sur le rapport du ministre de l’intérieur, Vu le code général des collectivités territoriales, notamment son article L. 3113-2 ; Vu le code électoral, notamment son article L. 191-1 ; Vu le décret no 2012-1479 du 27 décembre 2012 authentifiant les chiffres des populations de métropole, des départements d’outre-mer de la Guadeloupe, de la Guyane, de la Martinique et de La Réunion, de Saint- Barthélemy, de Saint-Martin et de Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon, ensemble le I de l’article 71 du décret no 2013-938 du 18 octobre 2013 portant application de la loi no 2013-403 du 17 mai 2013 relative à l’élection des conseillers départementaux, des conseillers municipaux et des conseillers communautaires, et modifiant le calendrier électoral ; Vu la délibération du conseil général du Calvados en date du 18 octobre 2013 ; Vu les autres pièces du dossier ; Le Conseil d’Etat (section de l’intérieur) entendu, Décrète : Art. 1er.−Le département du Calvados comprend vingt-cinq cantons : – canton no 1 (Aunay-sur-Odon) ; – canton no 2 (Bayeux) ; – canton no 3 (Bretteville-l’Orgueilleuse) ; – canton no 4 (Cabourg) ; – canton no 5 (Caen-1) ; – canton no 6 (Caen-2) ; – canton no 7 (Caen-3) ; – canton no 8 (Caen-4) ; – canton no 9 (Caen-5) ; – canton no 10 (Condé-sur-Noireau) ; – canton no 11 (Courseulles-sur-Mer) ; – canton no 12 (Evrecy) ; – canton no 13 (Falaise) ; – canton no 14 (Hérouville-Saint-Clair) ; – canton no 15 (Honfleur-Deauville) ; – canton no 16 (Ifs) ; – canton no 17 (Lisieux) ; – canton no 18 (Livarot) ; – canton no 19 (Mézidon-Canon) ; – canton no 20 (Ouistreham) ; – canton no 21 (Pont-l’Evêque) ; – canton no 22 (Thury-Harcourt) ; – canton no 23 (Trévières) ; – canton no 24 (Troarn) ; .
    [Show full text]
  • Chaucer's Official Life
    CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE JAMES ROOT HULBERT CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE Table of Contents CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE..............................................................................................................................1 JAMES ROOT HULBERT............................................................................................................................2 NOTE.............................................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................4 THE ESQUIRES OF THE KING'S HOUSEHOLD...................................................................................................7 THEIR FAMILIES........................................................................................................................................8 APPOINTMENT.........................................................................................................................................12 CLASSIFICATION.....................................................................................................................................13 SERVICES...................................................................................................................................................16 REWARDS..................................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Acqueville Bucéels Culey-Le-Patry Grainville-Sur-Odon Agy Cabourg
    Communes du ressort du tribunal d'instance de CAEN* Acqueville Bucéels Culey-le-Patry Grainville-sur-Odon Agy Cabourg Cussy Grandcamp-Maisy Amayé-sur-Orne Caen Cuverville Graye-sur-Mer Amayé-sur-Seulles Cagny Damblainville Grentheville Amfreville Cahagnolles Démouville Grimbosq Angoville Cairon Deux-Jumeaux Guéron Anisy Cambes-en-Plaine Donnay Hermanville-sur-Mer Arganchy Campigny Douvres-la-Délivrande Hérouville-Saint-Clair Argences Canchy Ducy-Sainte-Marguerite Hérouvillette Arromanches-les-Bains Canteloup Ellon Hom (Le) Asnelles Carcagny Émiéville Hottot-les-Bagues Asnières-en-Bessin Cardonville Englesqueville-la-Percée Hubert-Folie Aubigny Carpiquet Épaney Ifs Audrieu Cartigny-l'Épinay Épinay-sur-Odon Isigny-sur-Mer Aure sur Mer Castillon Épron Janville Aurseulles Caumont-sur-Aure Eraines Jort Authie Cauvicourt Ernes Juaye-Mondaye Avenay Cauville Escoville Juvigny-sur-Seulles Balleroy-sur-Drôme Cesny-aux-Vignes Espins La Bazoque Banneville-la-Campagne Cesny-Bois-Halbout Esquay-Notre-Dame La Caine Banville Chouain Esquay-sur-Seulles La Cambe Barbery Cintheaux Esson La Folie Barbeville Clécy Estrées-la-Campagne La Hoguette Baron-sur-Odon Cléville Éterville La Pommeraye Barou-en-Auge Colleville-Montgomery Étréham La Villette Basly Colleville-sur-Mer Évrecy Laize-Clinchamps Bavent Colombelles Falaise Landes-sur-Ajon Bayeux Colombières Feuguerolles-Bully Langrune-sur-Mer Bazenville Colombiers-sur-Seulles Fleury-sur-Orne Le Bô Beaumais Colomby-Anguerny Fontaine-Étoupefour Le Breuil-en-Bessin Bellengreville Combray Fontaine-Henry Le Bû-sur-Rouvres
    [Show full text]
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399
    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 Edited by David M. Smith 2020 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Alexander Neville 1374-1388 Register of Thomas Arundel 1388-1396 Sede Vacante Register 1397 Register of Robert Waldby 1397 Sede Vacante Register 1398 Register of Richard Scrope 1398-1405 YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1374-1399 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2020 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1374-1399 vii Editorial notes xiv Abbreviations xvi York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 1 Index of Ordinands 169 Index of Religious 249 Index of Titles 259 Index of Places 275 INTRODUCTION This fifth volume of medieval clerical ordinations at York covers the years 1374 to 1399, spanning the archiepiscopates of Alexander Neville, Thomas Arundel, Robert Waldby and the earlier years of Richard Scrope, and also including sede vacante ordinations lists for 1397 and 1398, each of which latter survive in duplicate copies. There have, not unexpectedly, been considerable archival losses too, as some later vacancy inventories at York make clear: the Durham sede vacante register of Alexander Neville (1381) and accompanying visitation records; the York sede vacante register after Neville’s own translation in 1388; the register of Thomas Arundel (only the register of his vicars-general survives today), and the register of Robert Waldby (likewise only his vicar-general’s register is now extant) have all long disappeared.1 Some of these would also have included records of ordinations, now missing from the chronological sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • GIPE-001848-Contents.Pdf
    Dhananjayarao Gadgil Library III~III~~ mlll~~ I~IIIIIIII~IIIU GlPE-PUNE-OO 1848 CONSTITUTION AL HISTORY OF ENGLAND STUBBS 1Lonbon HENRY FROWDE OXFORD tTNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE AMEN CORNEl!. THE CONSTITUTIONAL mSTORY OF ENGLAND IN ITS ORIGIN AND DEtrLOP~'r BY WILLIAM STUBBS, D.D., BON. LL.D. BISHOP OF CHESTER VOL. III THIRD EDITIOlY @d.orlt AT Tag CLARENDON PRESS J( Deco LXXXIV [ A II rig"'" reserved. ] V'S;LM3 r~ 7. 3 /fyfS CONTENTS. CHAPTER XVIII. LANCASTER AND YORK. 299. Character of the period, p. 3. 300. Plan of the chapter, p. 5. 301. The Revolution of 1399, p. 6. 302. Formal recognition of the new Dynasty, p. 10. 303. Parliament of 1399, p. 15. 304. Conspiracy of the Earls, p. 26. 805. Beginning af difficulties, p. 37. 306. Parliament of 1401, p. 29. 807. Financial and poli­ tical difficulties, p. 35. 308. Parliament of 1402, 'p. 37. 309. Rebellion of Hotspur, p. 39. 310. Parliament of 14°40 P.42. 311. The Unlearned Parliament, P.47. 312. Rebellion of Northum­ berland, p. 49. 813. The Long Parliament of 1406, p. 54. 314. Parties fonned at Court, p. 59. 315. Parliament at Gloucester, 14°7, p. 61. 816. Arundel's administration, p. 63. 317. Parlia­ mont of 1410, p. 65. 318. Administration of Thomae Beaufort, p. 67. 319. Parliament of 14II, p. 68. 820. Death of Henry IV, p. 71. 821. Character of H'!I'l'Y. V, p. 74. 322. Change of ministers, p. 78. 823. Parliament of 1413, p. 79. 324. Sir John Oldcastle, p. 80. 325.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wives of Henry the Eighth and the Parts They Played in History;
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARY _„ IE .' / PRINTED IN U.S.A. Cornell University Library DA 333.A2H92 1905a The wives of Henry the Eighth and the pa 3 1924 014 590 115 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924014590115 THE WIVES OF HENRY THE EIGHTH HENRY Fill. From a portrait fy JoST Van Cleef in the Royal Collection at Hampton Court Palace The Wives OF Henry the Eighth AND THE PARTS THEY PLAYED IN HISTORY BY MARTIN HUME AUTHOR OF "the COURTSHIPS OF QUEEN ELIZABETH ' " " THE LOVE AFFAIRS OF MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS " Thete are stars indeed. And sometimes falling enes.'" — Shakespeare URIS NEW YORK BRENTANO'S PUBLISHERS , 1 " lift Co ^ PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN PREFACE Either by chance or by the peculiar working of our constitution, the Queen Consorts of England have as a rule been nationally important only in proportion to the influence exerted by the pohtical tendencies which prompted their respective marri- ages. England has had no Catharine or Marie de Medici, no Elizabeth Farnese, no Catharine of Russia, no Caroline of Naples, no Maria Luisa of Spain, who, either through the minority of their sons or the weakness of their husbands, dominated the countries of their adoption ; the Consorts of English Kings having been, in the great majority of cases, simply domestic helpmates of their husbands and children, with comparatively small pohtical power or ambi- tion for themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheriffs of Shropshire," Has Entered at Considerable Length Into the History of the Ancient Family of Thynne, Otherwise Botfield, Or Botevyle
    468 THE FAMILY OF 'l'HYNNE, OTHERWISE BO'l'FIELD. THE Rev. J. B. Blakeway, in his account of "The Sheriffs of Shropshire," has entered at considerable length into the history of the ancient family of Thynne, otherwise Botfield, or Botevyle. He has correctly discarded the idea, originating with Matthew Paris, that the first recorded ancestor of this family, Geoffrey Botevile, was a native of Poictou, and that he settled on lands in Stretton, in the county of Salop, given him by the Earl of Arundel,' .and which lands were afterwards called by his name of Botevile: the fact being that the family, instead of giving their name to the place, derived their surname there• from; and the various members thereof are, upon all the ancient Court Rolls of the manor of Stretton, described as Bottefeld of Bottefeld, although in later years the branch of the family which continued to reside there adopted the orthography of Botevyle, by which name the place itself is now usually known. Mr. Blakeway himself has, however, fallen into several errors in the detail of the family; and his admission that Sir Ralph de Theyne, knight, who was examined in the great plea of arms, Lovel v. Morley, in 1395, might have belonged to this house was certainly made without any sufficient reason : for the name of Thynne was unknown in this distinguished Shrop• shire family until after the division of the family estates in the manor of Stretton in 1439, when Thomas Bottefeld settled his copyhold lands at Bottefeld upon his younger son John Botte• feld, the ancestor of the line thereafter resident on that estate, and his eldest son William Bottefeld adopted for his residence the mansion or inn a at Stretton, to which the freehold lands of the family, with various detached copyholds, were attached, and thus formed a separate estate and residence for himself and his descendants.
    [Show full text]