Son E.E. Head of the JIHT RAS Division MIPT Physical Mechanics Department Chair

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Son E.E. Head of the JIHT RAS Division MIPT Physical Mechanics Department Chair XVIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RUSSIA-KOREA-CIS August 26 ~ 28, 2018, Moscow Holiday Inn Current and perspective International Experiments at ISS Son E.E. Head of the JIHT RAS Division MIPT Physical Mechanics Department Chair 28/08/18 1 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 2 28/08/18 4 Overview Russia ISS program • Internaonal Collaboraon at ISS (Roscosmos, NASA, ESA, JAXA, CAN) • Plasma Crystal (PK -1, PK -2, PK -3, PK -4) –Example of successive collaboraon Roscosmos-ESA-NASA • Bose-Einstein Condensa4on – compression • Rydberg MaOer experiments at ISS Collabora4on NASA – ROSCOSMOS in Fundamental Physics (BEC Cold Atom Lab): o 30 May -01 June 2017, Santa Barbara California o 2017 – Ground Tes4ng CAL equipment 28/08/18o 2018 – Experiments at ISSNASA ISS Workshop 2017 5 Field Started Prepare On board Finished All ISS Russia Program 1. Processes and materials in Space 1 23 4 1 29 2. Earth and Space Research 3 33 10 17 63 3. Man in Space 7 13 9 19 48 4. Space biology and biotechnology 9 14 16 16 55 5. Technologies of Space Exploraon 6 31 15 9 61 6. Educaon and Popularizaon 1 8 6 3 18 All 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 201727 119 60 65 2716 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 8 “Shear-Driven Film” experiment on ISS Physical concept Thin (10-100 microns) intensively evaporated liquid films driven by forced gas/vapor flow in narrow channels (100-1000 microns) provide Optical window very high heat transfer intensity (up to 100 kW/m^2K) and are a Evaporation promising approach to thermal management of advanced Gas semiconductor devices with high power dissipation, as well as for Microchip several others space applications: energy production, cooling of engines, life support systems and waste water treatment Liquid Heat Preliminary results of ESA Parabolic flights: Gravity effect on the shee-rdriven liquid film behavior In microgravity liquid films became less stable and more wavy FC-72, Reg=154, Rel=8.2, h0=0.16 mm 0.01go 1.0go Gas 1.8go Map of the flow regimes of FC-72 in a minichanel 0.01g 1.0go o with height 1.5 mm and width 30 mm, T=10ºC Cheverda, Glushchuk, Queeckers, Chikov, Kabov, Liquid rivulets moved by shear stress of gas flow at altered levels of gravity, Microgravity sci. technol., 2013 “Shear-Driven Film” experiment on ISS Concept European Space Agency High speed schlieren system, IR camera and Thermal Platform confocal sensor Interchangeable heat pipe cell Adiabatic zone Optical window Vapor The vapor VAPOR OPTICAL WINDOW generation Evaporator side Condenser side system Liquid film Prototype of the test cell Heater platform Cooler platform Thermal conditioning platform TWO-PHASE LOCAL HEATER FLOW OUTLET LIQUID INLET Preliminary design of the heating elements GAS INLET Q=const Q=const T=const Flow 0.3 mm 0.5 mm “Shear-Driven Film” experiment on ISS Expected results: - New types of instabilities and flow structures - To improve knowledge of physics of two-phase flows with phase change in microgravity 1.3 - Validation of 3D mathematical model for microgravity conditions 1.2 Gas Water and Nitrogen gas Horizontal channel HC=250 µm 1.1 0 H / 1 h 0.9 0g 0.8 1g 10g 20g Heang element Nonlinear effect 0.7 µ (T), σ (T) -4 0 4 8 12 x Gas-liquid interface position along the channel, Re=2, GAS-LIQUID INTERFACE 2 Reg=20, H0=59,58µm. 1x1 cm Kabova, Kuznetsov, Kabov, Gravity Effect on Evaporation and Interfacial Deformations in Nonisothermal Liquid Film Moved by a Gas Flow in a Microgap, Interfacial Phenomena and Heat Transfer, 2014 “Shear-Driven Film” experiment on ISS Gravity effect on the shee-rdriven liquid film behavior Experiments in Parabolic Flights Gravity level 2 1.6 Gas 0 1.2 g / g 0.8 0.4 0 33310 33320 33330 33340 33350 33360 33370 Time[c] Capillary length Gravity level Water, ls g m mm m/s2 0.0027 2.72 g0 Normal g -2 0.027 27.2 g0*10 PF -4 0.272 272.7 g0*10 ISS -6 2.72 2727.5 g0*10 Deep space FC-72, Reg=154, Rel=8.2, h0=0.16 mm σ Lsystem < lσ lσ = Bond number, L-characteristic length ρ g Thermal-physics and hydrodynamics of two-phase systems under microgravity is essentially thermal-physics and hydrodynamics of microsystems and microchannels 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 16 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 17 Space Experiment “Plasma Kristall”, EKoPlasma performed with JIHT RAS at the Space Stations since 1998: PK-4 2020 OS “Mir” PK-3Plus RF PK-3-Nefedov 2014 RF Combined DC/RF(i) plasma 2006 PK-2 RF(e) plasma 2000 ISS PK-1 1999 DC plasma 28/08/18 UV plasma 1998 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 18 Space setup PK-3-Plus is sufficiently elaborated apparatus y 2D z • High plasma parameters homogeneity due to electrodes design • Perfect observation conditions due to glass walls • High temperature homogeneity due to construction design 3D • 13.56 Mhz RF power driven large disk electrodes • Wide ground rings around the electrodes • Guard rings hold 3 dispensers each • The dispensers provide 14.91; 9.19; 6.81; 3.42; 2.55 µm melamine formaldehyde and 1.55 µm silica mono disperse particles V. E. Fortov and G. E. Morfill, eds., Complex and Dusty 28/08/18 NASA ISS WorkshopPlasmas: From2017 Laboratory to Space (CRC Press, Boca 19 Raton, FL, 2010). Development of 3D diagnostics for PK-3 data Example video from ISS Dust particles 3.42 µm, argon pressure 11 Pa, effective voltage 14.5 V Quadrant view camera: High Resolution Camera: horizontal: 1 Pixel ≡ 49.6 µm horizontal: 1 Pixel ≡ 11.3 µm vertical: 1 Pixel ≡ 45.05 µm vertical: 1 Pixel ≡ 10.3 µm Frame size: 720x576 pixels, video: 50 frames per second, scan speed: 0.6 mm/s Procedure of the scanning allows us to determine clearly a position of the single 28/08/18 dust particle in 3D-space NASA ISS Workshop 2017 20 Determination of 3D coordinates of dust particles Y Z X Visualization of 3D brightness matrix Sequence of images voxel size: 11.3 x 10.3 x 12 µm3 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 21 PK-4 is a new tool for studying hydrodynamic phenomena at the kinetic level PK-4 in Columbus Residential module 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 22 PK-4 experiment layout 1600 х 1200 Spectromentr 1600 х 1200 Dusty plasma manipulators: 44х17 mm RF1 • Laser • Ring electrode • Local heater • Gas flow • RF(i) discharges • DC 35 cm Vacuum pump Gas inlet 1. Gas pressure: 2 – 266 Pa 2. Gases: neon, argon, argon+20%O2 3. Particles: 1 – 12 mcm (5 diameters) 4. DC: 0,2 – 5 мА, including polarity switching regime 5. RF(i) power < 5 W 6. Gas flow: 0.1 – 12 sccm 28/08/18 7. Manipulation laser – 0 – 20 NASAW ISS Workshop 2017 23 Review of Scientific Instruments (2016), 87, 093505 PK-4 experiments at the ISS 2015 2016 2017 27 December 2014 1-5 June 2015 10-17 July 2016 12-17 February 2017 Installation PK-4 in PK-4 commissioning by 2nd experimental campaign 4th experimental campaign Columbus by Еlena Serova Gennady Padalka by Alexei Ovchinin by Oleg Novitzky and Аlex Samokutyaev 25-30 October 2015 9-14 October 2016 1st experimental campaign 3rd experimental campaign by Oleg Kononenko by Anatoly Ivanishin 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 24 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 25 Experimental setup for Efficient Excitation and Detection of Rydberg States in Down fluorescence diagnostic method. Ultracold Lithium-7 Atoms Without Rydberg atoms destruction. Head of lab. 1.2.3.3.JIHT RAS Dr. Boris B. Zelener * * t, min * * 1] Zelener B B, Saakyan S A, Sautenkov V A, Manykin E A, Zelener B V and Fortov V E 2015 JETP 148(6) 1086 * 2] Zelener B B, Saakyan S A, Sautenkov V A, Manykin E A, Zelener B V and Fortov V E 2016 JETP 149(4) 750 Our value 2015 [1] fluorescence Δν, GHz In our simulations we use Monte-Carlo and molecular dynamics methods [1-3]. Reduction of plasma recombination and creation of regular structure are demonstrated under strong interaction condition. Magnetic field can help dramatically reduce the rate of plasma recombination. Ideal gas condition Strong interaction condition 1. Butlitsky M.A., Zelener B.B., Zelener B.V. // Journal of Chemical Physics, 141, 2, 14, (2014) 2. Bobrov A.A., Bronin S.J., Zelener B.B., Zelener B.V., Manykin E.A., Khikhlukha D.R., Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 117, 1, 161 (2013) 3. Manykin E.A., Zelener B.B. and Zelener B.V. JETP Lett. 92, 630, 2010 28/08/18 NASA ISS Workshop 2017 28 Finished Projects Space NASA Modern Projects Transport Systems X-15 1950-1960 Space Shuttle Лётные испытания 1986-2011 Эксплуатация X-33 Venture Star 1995-2003 XS-1 (DARPA) ВКА X-37B (Boeing) ЛИ демонстратора ЛИ c 2018 г. ЛИ с 2010 г. Falcon-9 (SpaceX) X-20 Dyna-Soar X-38 ЛИ с 2012 г. Dream Chaser 1957-1963 1998-2001 (Sierra Nevada) Лётные испытания ЛИ демонстратора ЛИ с 2013 г. X-34 1996-2003 ЛИ демонстратора X-30 NASP 1986-1995 X-43A Hiper-X Наземная отработка 1996-2003 ЛИ демонстратора X-37 Future-X PathFinder 1998-2004 New Shepard WhiteKnightTwo + SpaceShipTwo, Lynx (XCOR Aerospace) ЛИ демонстратора (Blue Origin) ЛИ с 2017 г. ESA ЛИ с 2015 г. (Virgin Galactic) ЛИ с 2010 г.
Recommended publications
  • Aerospace America
    June 2016 Ambition: Europa NASA might find more than life in this moon’s ocean. It could find a new strategy for exploring other worlds. Page 22 Oklahoma’s Bridenstine on climate, term limits/8 20 years of Design/Build/Fly/30 Smart bombs for wildfires/38 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS • COVER-0616ƒ.indd 1 5/19/16 1:18 PM 2O16 13 –17 JUNE 2016 WASHINGTON, D.C. AIAA AVIATION 2016 is the only aviation Exclusive Premier Sponsor event that covers the entire integrated spectrum of aviation business and technology. Confirmed Speakers Charles F. Michimasa Maj. Gen. Mike Delaney John S. Richard A. Clarke Bolden Jr. Fujino Joe Engle Langford Vice President, Chairman & CEO, Administrator, President & CEO, United States Air Airplane Chairman and Good Harbor NASA Honda Aircraft Force (Ret.) Development, Chief Executive Security Risk Company The Boeing Officer, Aurora Management, LLC Company Flight Sciences Corporation REGISTER TODAY! AIAA-AVIATION.ORG 16-1132 June 2016 DEPARTMENTS Page 16 EDITOR’S NOTEBOOK 2 Congress’s dynamic aerospace duo IN BRIEF 4 3D-printed drone; status change at Ames? smart repair manuals; Page 34 subscale aircraft CONVERSATION 8 Change agent for aerospace CASE STUDY 12 Preventing more MH370s ENGINEERING NOTEBOOK 16 Making a money saver OUT OF THE PAST 46 Page 4 CAREER OPPORTUNITIES 48 FEATURES AMBITION: EUROPA 22 Jupiter’s moon Europa could have life in the ocean under its shell. NASA came up with a step-by-step plan to find out. Then, along came a congressman from Texas. by Debra Werner Page 38 DESIGNING A WINNER 30 AIAA’s Design/Build/Fly contest gives college students a chance to pit their engineering smarts against international competitors in a remote-controlled aircraft flyoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report on Different RLV Return Modes' Performances
    Formation flight for in-Air Launcher 1st stage Capturing demonstration Technical Report on different RLV return modes’ Performances Deliverable D2.1 EC project number 821953 Research and Innovation action Space Research Topic: SPACE-16-TEC-2018 – Access to space FALCon Formation flight for in-Air Launcher 1st stage Capturing demonstration Technical Report on different RLV return modes’ Performances Deliverable Reference Number: D2.1 Due date of deliverable: 30th November 2019 Actual submission date (draft): 15th December 2019 Actual submission date (final version): 19th October 2020 Start date of FALCon project: 1st of March 2019 Duration: 36 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: DLR Revision #: 2 Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) APPROVAL Title issue revision Technical Report on different RLV return modes’ 2 1 performances Author(s) date Sven Stappert 19.10.2020 Madalin Simioana 21.07.2020 Martin Sippel Approved by Date Sven Stappert 19.10.2020 Martin Sippel FALCon D2.1: RLV Return Mode Performances vers. 19-Oct-20 Page i Contents List of Tables iii List of Figures iii Nomenclature vi 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scope of the deliverable ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disrupting Launch Systems
    DISRUPTING LAUNCH SYSTEMS THE RISE OF SPACEX AND EUROPEAN ACCESS TO SPACE Thesis submitted to the International Space University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the M. Sc. Degree in Space Studies August 2017 Thesis author: Paul Wohrer Thesis supervisor: Prof. Jean-Jacques Favier International Space University 1 Abstract The rise of SpaceX as a major launch provider has been the most surprising evolution of the launch sector during the past decade. It forced incumbent industrial actors to adapt their business model to face this new competitor. European actors are particularly threatened today, since European Autonomous Access to Space highly depends on the competitive edge of the Ariane launcher family. This study argues that the framework of analysis which best describes the events leading to the current situation is the theory of disruptive innovation. The study uses this framework to analyse the reusability technology promoted by new actors of the launch industry. The study argues that, while concurring with most analysis that the price advantage of reused launchers remains questionable, the most important advantage of this technology is the convenience it could confer to launch systems customers. The study offers two recommendations to European actors willing to maintain European Autonomous Access to Space. The first one aims at allocating resources toward a commercial exploitation of the Vega small launch system, to disrupt the growing market of small satellites and strengthen ties with Italian partners in the launcher program. The second aims at increasing the perception of European launchers as strategic assets, to avoid their commoditization. The recommendation entails developing an autonomous European capacity to launch astronauts into space, which could strengthen the ties between France and Germany as well as lead to a rationalization of the geo-return principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Launchers Preparatory Programme”: the Reusability Option for Ariane Evolutions
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-971 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) LAUNCH VEHICLES SYSTEM STUDIES IN THE “FUTURE LAUNCHERS PREPARATORY PROGRAMME”: THE REUSABILITY OPTION FOR ARIANE EVOLUTIONS. Olivier Gogdet(1), Jamila Mansouri(2), Jerome Breteau(3) , Antoine Patureau De Mirand(4), (5) Eric Louaas (1) Ariane Group (AG), 66, route de Verneuil, 78130 Les Mureaux (France) Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency (ESA), 52, rue Jacques Hillairet, 75012 Paris (France) Email:[email protected] (3) European Space Agency (ESA), 52, rue Jacques Hillairet, 75012 Paris (France) Email:[email protected] (4) Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), 52, rue Jacques Hillairet, 75012 Paris Cedex (France) Email:[email protected] (5) Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), 52, rue Jacques Hillairet, 75012 Paris Cedex (France) Email:[email protected] ABSTRACT: The European launchers shall answer the evolutions of the payloads and their mission profiles. Ariane 6 and Vega-C programmes are the next step “short term” answers. But Beyond that, the Future Launchers Preparatory Programme (FLPP) managed By ESA, prepares the future launcher system architectures and the enaBling technologies through demonstrators. Concerning the future of Ariane, and in front of the increasing competition pressure, the system and technology activities in FLPP/NEO shall prepare the options that will ensure sustainaBle competitiveness. Part of these activities, the in-flight reusaBle vehicle demonstration aims to contriBute to the following targets: • Ariane Recurring Cost decrease with a target of -50% compared to Ariane 6 Baseline • ReusaBility to reduce investment in production means (CAPEX) • Acquisition of the reusaBility key competences not availaBle in Europe The reusaBility option, for the future liquid Boosters and/or lower stage, is under evaluation through Ariane Group studies currently ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Vehicle First Stage Reusability a Study to Compare Different Recovery Optionslaunch Vehicle for Am
    Launch Vehicle First Stage Reusability Launch Vehicle First Stage Reusability a study to compare different Technische Universiteit Delft recovery options for a reusable launch vehicle M. D. Rozemeijer Launch Vehicle First Stage Reusability a study to compare different recovery options for a reusable launch vehicle by M. D. Rozemeijer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Tuesday December 1st, 2020 at 09:00. Student number: 4141733 Project duration: April 23, 2019 – December 1, 2020 Thesis committee: Ir. B. T. C. Zandbergen, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. A. Cervone, TU Delft Ir. M. C. Naeije, TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface This report concludes, and is the culmination of, my Master thesis to complete the master curriculum in the field of Aerospace Engineering. Besides this, it also, hopefully, answers part of the question on how to make access to space easier. I have been working in the field of entry descent and landing since the start of the Stratos III project in 2016. This is also the start of the ParSim tool, which is the base of my thesis tool. Back then it was only able to recover part of the Stratos III rocket. This tool expanded to encompass the demands for the other projects I have been working on within Delft Aerospace Rocket Engineering (DARE), which are Project Aether and the Supersonic Parachute Experiment Aboard Rexus (SPEAR) all within the Parachute Research Group. Besides the tool, working on these projects increased my knowledge of Entry, Descent and Landing tremendously.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper: Is It Worth It? the Economics of Reusable Space Transportation
    Presented at the 2016 International Training Symposium: www.iceaaonline.com/bristol2016 Is It Worth It? The Economics of Reusable Space Transportation ICEAA 2016 International Training Symposium Bristol, UK, October, 2016 Richard Webb KAR Enterprises Abstract Over the past several decades billions of dollars have been invested by governments and private companies in the pursuit of lower cost access to space through earth-to-orbit (ETO) space transportation systems. Much of that investment has been focused on the development and operation of various forms of reusable transportation systems. From the Space Shuttle to current efforts by private commercial companies, the overarching belief of those making such investments has been that reusing system elements will be cheaper than utilizing expendable systems that involve throwing away costly engines, avionics, and other hardware with each flight. However, the view that reusable systems are ultimately a “better” approach to providing ETO transportation is not held universally by major stakeholders within the space transportation industry. While the technical feasibility of at least some degree of reusability has been demonstrated, there continues to be a sometimes lively debate over the merits and drawbacks of reusable versus expendable systems from an economic perspective. In summary, is it worth it? Based on our many years of direct involvement with the business aspects of several expendable and reusable transportation systems, it appears to us that much of the discussion surrounding reusability is hindered by a failure to clearly define and understand the financial and other metrics by which the financial “goodness” of a reusable or expandable approach is measured. As stakeholders, the different users and suppliers of space transportation have a varied set of criteria for determining the relative economic viability of alternative strategies, including reusability.
    [Show full text]
  • Intel International Science and Engineering Fair 2016 Program May 8 – 13, 2016 Phoenix, Arizona Intel International Science and Engineering Fair
    THINK BEYOND Intel International Science and Engineering Fair 2016 Program May 8 – 13, 2016 Phoenix, Arizona Intel International Science and Engineering Fair About the Intel ISEF The Intel International Science and Engineering Fair (Intel ISEF), a program of Society for Science & the Public, is the world’s largest international pre-college science competition. The Intel ISEF is the premier science competition in the world and provides a forum for more than 1,750 high school students from more than 75 countries, regions and territories to showcase their independent research annually. Each year, millions of students worldwide compete in local science fairs; winners go on to participate in Intel ISEF-affiliated regional, state and national fairs to earn the opportunity to attend the Intel ISEF. Uniting these top young scientific minds, the Intel ISEF provides the opportunity to finalists to display their talent on an international stage, while enabling them to submit their work for judging by doctoral-level scientists. The Intel ISEF provides awards of nearly $4 million in prizes and scholarships annually. Intel International Science and Engineering Fair 2016 Intel International Science and Engineering Fair 2016 Greetings ..........................................................................................................2 Title Sponsor ..................................................................................................6 Gordon E. Moore Award ..........................................................................7 About
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Small Launcher
    NLR-TP-2015-472 | November 2015 Innovative Small Launcher CUSTOMER: Netherlands Aerospace Centre NLR – Netherlands Aerospace Centre Netherlands Aerospace Centre The NLR is a leading international research centre for aerospace. Bolstered by its multidisciplinary expertise and unrivalled research facilities, NLR provides innovative and integral solutions for the complex challenges in the aerospace sector. The NLR’s activities span the full spectrum of Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDT & E). Given the NLR’s specialist knowledge and facilities, companies turn to the NLR for validation, verification, qualification, simulation and evaluation. The NLR thereby bridges the gap between research and practical applications, while working for both government and industry at home and abroad. The NLR stands for practical and innovative solutions, technical expertise and a long-term design vision. This allows the NLR’s cutting edge technology to find its way into successful aerospace programs of OEMs, including Airbus, Embraer and Pilatus. NLR contributes to (military) programs, such as ESA’s IXV re-entry vehicle, the F-35, the Apache helicopter, and European programs, including SESAR and Clean Sky 2. Founded in 1919, and employing some 650 people, the NLR achieved a turnover of 73 million euros in 2014, of which three-quarters derived from contract research, and the remaining from government funds. For more information visit: www.nlr.nl EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNCLASSIFIED Innovative Small Launcher Problem area REPORT NUMBER The market for small satellites is expected to increase substantially in NLR-TP-2015-472 the coming years, but there is little capacity to launch them affordably. No operational dedicated launcher for small satellites exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Performance Testing of Cubesat ADCS Case Study on Delfi-N3xt Van Kleef, A.J.P. , Oving, B.A. , Verberne, C.J. , Haemmerli
    Ground Performance Testing of CubeSat ADCS Case Study on Delfi-n3Xt Van Kleef, A.J.P. (1), Oving, B.A. (1), Verberne, C.J. (2), Haemmerli, B. (2), Kuhn, M. (3), Müller, I. (3), Petkov, I. (3) (1) Netherlands Aerospace Centre NLR Voorsterweg 31, Marknesse; +31 885114834, +31 885114233 [email protected], [email protected] (2) Nammo Raufoss AS Enggata 37, Raufoss; +47 61152970, +47 90737496 [email protected], [email protected] (3) German Aerospace Center DLR Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, Stuttgart; +49 71168628408, +49 7116862448, +49 71168628131 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Today’s market for small satellites is expanding, but there is little capacity for affordable launches. Launch costs of €50,000 per kg are required to compete with ride-shares. Cost reduction is essential, e.g. through reuse, low cost components, volume production, optimised manufacturing. Fourteen European companies and institutes are joining forces in a Horizon2020 programme called “SMall Innovative Launcher for Europe” (SMILE). The project aims at designing a launcher for satellites up to 50 kg and a European-based launch facility at Andøya, as well as demonstrating critical technologies on propulsion, avionics, and manufacturing of cost-effective solutions. For the propulsion, a trade-off between liquid and hybrid engines will be made to realise the objectives of the project, both in terms of performance and economic viability. Liquid propulsion offers reliability, high performance, throttling capability and easy re-ignition. LOX and kerosene propellants are considered, being low-cost, worldwide available, green, and storable.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Mosaic of #Plutotime Photos
    December 2015 2015 NASA mosaic of #PlutoTime photos A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS At this time of year, we count our blessings and give back to the people and organizations that have helped us grow in our profession. Please join the AIAA Foundation Board of Trustees and many AIAA members who have already donated to the AIAA Foundation. Your support is critical to our work of offering educational programs, conferences, scholarships and design competitions. Share your legacy and support and inspire tomorrow’s aerospace leaders by giving to the AIAA Foundation. www.aiaafoundation.org #AdvancingAerospace AIAA strongly believes in the importance of our educational programs and will match individual and corporate donations up to $1 million dollars (of unrestricted funds). The AIAA Foundation is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization recognized under section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. All donations are tax deductible. December 2015 EDITOR’S NOTEBOOK 2 OUT OF THE PAST 72 CAREER OPPORTUNITIES 74 THE YEAR IN REVIEW The most important developments as described by AIAA’s Technical and Program Committees Adaptive Structures 6 Microgravity and Space Processes 61 Aeroacoustics 14 Missile Systems 62 Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems 26 Multidisciplinary Design Optimization 7 Aerodynamic Measurement Technology 15 Non-Deterministic Approaches 8 Aerospace Power Systems 50 Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion 56 Aircraft Design 27 Plasmadynamics and Lasers 23 Aircraft Operations 28 Pressure
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Comparison of Reusable First Stage Return Options
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-438 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) A Systematic Comparison of Reusable First Stage Return Options Sven Stappert*, Jascha Wilken*, Leonid Bussler*, Martin Sippel* *German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Space Systems, Robert-Hooke-Straße 7, 28359 Bremen [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The recent success of the emerging private space companies SpaceX and Blue Origin in landing, recovering and relaunching first stages have demonstrated the possibility of building reliable reusable launchers with low launch costs. Due to this risen interest in reusability, the project AKIRA was initiated by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in 2017. This multidisciplinary project focuses on identifying and investigating key technologies for possible future reusable launch vehicles. Within this paper the focus is set on the comparison of different return options including vertical takeoff, vertical landing and vertical takeoff, horizontal landing on a technological and economic level. Abbreviations AoA Angle of Attack ASDS Autonomous Spaceport Droneship DRL Downrange Landing EC Economical Condition ELV Expendable Launch Vehicle FB Flyback GLOM Gross Lift-Off Mass IAC In-Air Capturing Isp Specific Impulse LFBB Liquid Fly-Back Booster LZ-1 Landing Zone 1 MECO Main Engine Cut-Off RLV Reusable Launch Vehicle RoRo Roll On, Roll Off (Ship) RTLS Return to Launch Site STS Space Transportation System TOSCA Trajectory Optimization and Simulation of Conventional and Advanced Spacecraft TRL Technology Readiness Level VTHL Vertical Takeoff, Horizontal Landing VTVL Vertical Takeoff, Vertical Landing 1. Introduction While reusability in space transportation can have a strong impact on the costs and thus competitiveness of space launchers, the historic Space Shuttle has also shown that this impact does not necessarily have to be positive if the refurbishment costs cannot be kept low.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Reusable Space Transportation ICEAA 2016 International Training Symposium Bristol, UK, October, 2016 Richard Webb KAR Enterprises Abstract
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160013370 2019-08-29T17:24:41+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NASA Technical Reports Server Is It Worth It? The Economics of Reusable Space Transportation ICEAA 2016 International Training Symposium Bristol, UK, October, 2016 Richard Webb KAR Enterprises Abstract Over the past several decades billions of dollars have been invested by governments and private companies in the pursuit of lower cost access to space through earth-to-orbit (ETO) space transportation systems. Much of that investment has been focused on the development and operation of various forms of reusable transportation systems. From the Space Shuttle to current efforts by private commercial companies, the overarching belief of those making such investments has been that reusing system elements will be cheaper than utilizing expendable systems that involve throwing away costly engines, avionics, and other hardware with each flight. However, the view that reusable systems are ultimately a “better” approach to providing ETO transportation is not held universally by major stakeholders within the space transportation industry. While the technical feasibility of at least some degree of reusability has been demonstrated, there continues to be a sometimes lively debate over the merits and drawbacks of reusable versus expendable systems from an economic perspective. In summary, is it worth it? Based on our many years of direct involvement with the business aspects of several expendable and reusable transportation systems, it appears to us that much of the discussion surrounding reusability is hindered by a failure to clearly define and understand the financial and other metrics by which the financial “goodness” of a reusable or expandable approach is measured.
    [Show full text]