DOCSLIB.ORG

San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan Final Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan Final Environmental Impact Report San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan Final Environmental Impact Report March 2011 Prepared by: GAIA Consulting, Inc. with assistance from Prepared for: Grassetti Environmental California State Coastal Conservancy Consulting, URS Corpora- 1330 Broadway, tion, and H.T. Harvey & Suite 1300 Associates Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 286-1015 SCH # 2007112080 Fax: (510) 286-0470 VOLUME 1 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ____________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REVISED EIR ............................................ 2-1 2.1 Master Comment Responses ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Master Comment Response 1: Funding of WT Program Activities, Trailheads, Trailhead Maintenance, Signage, Law Enforcement, and Mitigation Measures ........... 2-1 2.1.2 Master Comment Response 2: Enforcement of Mitigation Measures ................ 2-2 2.1.3 Master Comment Response 3: Feasibility and Adequacy of Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.1.4 Master Comment Response 4: Proposed Additions or Changes to the List of Backbone Sites Included in the Water Trail Plan ....................................................... 2-9 2.1.5 Master Comment Response 5: Resources for and Coordination of Law Enforcement Activities ......................................................................................... 2-10 2.1.6 Master Comment Response 6: Complexity of Trailhead Designation Process and Related CEQA and Permit Requirements ............................................................... 2-12 2.1.7 Master Comment Response 7: CEQA Significance Thresholds ....................... 2-13 2.1.8 Master Comment Response 8: CEQA Analysis Issues ..................................... 2-14 2.2 Responses to Comments from Federal, State and Local Agencies .......................... 2-15 2.2.1 Responses to Comments from the United States Department of the Interior – United States Fish and Wildlife Service ............................................................ 2-15 2.2.2 Responses to Comments from the United States Department of the Interior – National Park Service ........................................................................................ 2-31 2.2.3 Responses to Comments from the State of California Department of Fish and Game .................................................................................................................. 2-33 2.2.4 Responses to Comments from the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development ............................................................................ 2-35 2.2.5 Responses to Comments from the County of Marin Department of Parks and Open Space ........................................................................................................ 2-34 2.2.6 Responses to Comments from the County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department ......................................................................................................... 2-36 2.2.7 Responses to Comments from the East Bay Regional Park District ................. 2-36 2.2.8 Responses to Comments from the Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region......................................................................................................... 2-39 2.2.9 Responses to Comments from the City of Hercules .......................................... 2-41 2.3 Response to Comments from Organizations ............................................................. 2-42 2.3.1 Responses to Comments from Bay Access, Inc. ................................................ 2-42 2.3.2 Responses to Comments from Friends of Corte Madera Creek ........................ 2-45 2.3.3 Responses to Comments from Marin Audubon Society .................................... 2-46 2.3.4 Responses to Comments from San Francisco Board Sailing Association ......... 2-51 2.3.5 Responses to Comments from Save the Bay ..................................................... 2-52 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL PLAN i COASTAL CONSERVANCY FINAL EIR MARCH 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.3.6 Responses to Comments from Shoreline Watch for San Jose ........................... 2-52 2.4 Responses to Comments from Individuals. ............................................................... 2-55 2.4.1 Responses to Written Comments from Norton Bell. ......................................... 2-55 2.4.2 Responses to Written Comments from Ted Choi – City Kayak ........................ 2-55 2.4.3 Responses to Written Comments from Arthur Feinstein (Consulting for Conservation) ..................................................................................................... 2-56 2.4.4 Responses to Written Comments from Beth Huning ......................................... 2-57 2.4.5 Responses to Written Comments from Paul Kamen. ......................................... 2-58 2.4.6 Responses to Verbal Comments from Paul Kamen. .......................................... 2-61 2.4.7 Responses to Verbal Comments from Jim McGrath ......................................... 2-62 2.4.8 Responses to Written Comments from Paul Nixon. .......................................... 2-63 2.4.9 Responses to Verbal Comments from Paul Nixon ............................................ 2-63 2.4.10 Responses to Written Comments from Gail Raabe. .......................................... 2-63 2.4.11 Responses to Written Comments from Richard Santos. .................................... 2-64 2.4.12 Responses to Verbal Comments from Richard Skaff ........................................ 2-64 2.4.13 Responses to Verbal Comments from Casey Walker ........................................ 2-65 3. COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REVISED EIR 3.1 Comments from Federal, State and Local Agencies. Comments from the United States Department of the Interior – United States Fish and Wildlife Service Comments from the United States Department of the Interior – National Park Service Comments from the State of California Department of Fish and Game Comments from the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development Comments from the County of Marin Department of Parks and Open Space Comments from the County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department Comments from the East Bay Regional Park District Comments from the Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region Comments from the City of Hercules 3.2 Comments from Organizations. Comments from Bay Access, Inc. Comments from Friends of Corte Madera Creek Comments from Marin Audubon Society Comments from San Francisco Board Sailing Association Comments from Save the Bay Comments from Shoreline Watch for San Jose 3.3 Comments from Individuals. Written Comments from Norton Bell. Written Comments from Ted Choi – City Kayak Written Comments from Arthur Feinstein (Consulting for Conservation) Written Comments from Beth Huning Written Comments from Paul Kamen SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL PLAN ii COASTAL CONSERVANCY FINAL EIR MARCH 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Verbal Comments from Paul Kamen Verbal Comments from Jim McGrath Written Comments from Paul Nixon Verbal Comments from Paul Nixon Written Comments from Gail Raabe Written Comments from Richard Santos Verbal Comments from Richard Skaff Verbal Comments from Casey Walker 4. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................................... 4-1 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL PLAN iii COASTAL CONSERVANCY FINAL EIR MARCH 2011 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document, together with the San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan Draft Revised EIR (DREIR), constitutes the San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) in accordance with Section 15132 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This FEIR contains limited additional information that was not included in the DREIR. This additional information clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to the information contained in the DREIR. The recommended alternative from the DREIR remains Alternative 3, the Enhanced San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Plan (Enhanced Water Trail Plan), which was identified as the environmentally superior alternative. Following this introduction, Chapter 2 provides responses to the comments made on the DREIR during the public review period (August 3 – September 21, 2010, with one additional, accepted comment letter dated September 22), including comments made at the public hearing for the DREIR on August 24, 2010. Chapter 3 provides the comment letters and transcripts of the verbal comments received at the public meeting, and Chapter 4 contains the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Twenty-eight comment letters (including e-mails and transcripts of verbal comments) were received, some of which repeated concerns expressed in other letters. The most common areas of concern were on the adequacy or enforceability of mitigation measures, funding for mitigation measures and site improvements, the trailhead designation process, and aspects of the CEQA process. Responses to similar comments were grouped into eight master responses, which are presented
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marin Islands NWR Sport Fishing Plan
    Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 MARIN ISLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 3 SPORT FISHING PLAN 3 1. Introduction 3 2. Statement of Objectives 4 3. Description of the Fishing Program 5 A. Area to be Opened to Fishing 5 B. Species to be Taken, Fishing periods, Fishing Access 5 C. Fishing Permit Requirements 7 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State 7 E. Law Enforcement 7 F. Funding and Staffing Requirements 8 4. Conduct of the Fishing Program 8 A. Permit Application, Selection, and/or Registration Procedures (if applicable) 8 B. Refuge-Spec if ic Fishing Regulat ions 8 C. Relevant State Regulations 8 D. Other Refuge Rules and Regulations for Sport Fishing 8 5. Public Engagement 9 A. Outreach for Announcing and Publicizing the Fishing Program 9 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Fishing Program 9 C. How Anglers Will Be Informed of Relevant Rules and Regulations 9 6. Compatibility Determination 9 7. Literature Cited 9 List of Figures Figure 1. Proposed Sport Fishing Area Fishing…………………………………6 Marin Islands NWR Fishing Plan Page 2 MARIN ISLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SPORT FISHING PLAN 1. Introduction National Wildlife Refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), the purposes of an individual refuge, Service policy, and laws and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, and selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations and Fish and Wildlife Service Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Fill in San Francisco: a History of Change
    SDMS DOCID# 1137835 BAY FILL IN SAN FRANCISCO: A HISTORY OF CHANGE A thesis submitted to the faculty of California State University, San Francisco in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Gerald Robert Dow Department of Geography July 1973 Permission is granted for the material in this thesis to be reproduced in part or whole for the purpose of education and/or research. It may not be edited, altered, or otherwise modified, except with the express permission of the author. - ii - - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Maps . vi INTRODUCTION . .1 CHAPTER I: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF SAN FRANCISCO’S TIDELANDS . .4 Definition of Tidelands . .5 Evolution of Tideland Ownership . .5 Federal Land . .5 State Land . .6 City Land . .6 Sale of State Owned Tidelands . .9 Tideland Grants to Railroads . 12 Settlement of Water Lot Claims . 13 San Francisco Loses Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 14 San Francisco Regains Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 15 The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and the Port of San Francisco . 18 CHAPTER II: YERBA BUENA COVE . 22 Introduction . 22 Yerba Buena, the Beginning of San Francisco . 22 Yerba Buena Cove in 1846 . 26 San Francisco’s First Waterfront . 26 Filling of Yerba Buena Cove Begins . 29 The Board of State Harbor Commissioners and the First Seawall . 33 The New Seawall . 37 The Northward Expansion of San Francisco’s Waterfront . 40 North Beach . 41 Fisherman’s Wharf . 43 Aquatic Park . 45 - iii - Pier 45 . 47 Fort Mason . 48 South Beach . 49 The Southward Extension of the Great Seawall .
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Cunneen Collection of South End Rowing Club Photographs, 1880-2003
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8w957k3 Online items available A guide to the Patrick Cunneen collection of South End Rowing Club photographs, 1880-2003 Processed by: Amy Croft and M. Crawford, 2012. San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 [email protected] URL: http://www.nps.gov/safr 2016 A guide to the Patrick Cunneen P07-004 (SAFR 23145) 1 collection of South End Rowing Club photographs, 1880-2003 A Guide to the Patrick Cunneen collection of South End Rowing Club photographs P07-004 San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, National Park Service 2016, National Park Service Title: Patrick Cunneen collection of South End Rowing Club photographs Date: 1880-2003 Date (bulk): 1930-1970 Identifier/Call Number: P07-004 (SAFR 23145) Creator: Cunneen, Patrick Physical Description: 484 items. Some items available online. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Abstract: The Patrick Cunneen collection of South End Rowing Club photographs, 1880-2003, (P07-004, SAFR 23145) is comprised mainly of club members rowing, swimming, running, and socializing at their boathouse in San Francisco and in other locations in the San Francisco Bay Area. The collection has been processed to the item level. Physical Location: San Francisco Maritime NHP, Historic Documents Department Language(s): In English. Access This collection is open for use unless otherwise noted. Publication and Use Rights Some material may be copyrighted or restricted. It is the researcher's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other case restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is twofold: to provide general information for anyone interested in the California islands and to serve as a field guide for visitors to the islands. The book covers both general history and nat- ural history, from the geological origins of the islands through their aboriginal inhabitants and their marine and terrestrial biotas. Detailed coverage of the flora and fauna of one island alone would completely fill a book of this size; hence only the most common, most readily observed, and most interesting species are included. The names used for the plants and animals discussed in this book are the most up-to-date ones available, based on the scientific literature and the most recently published guidebooks. Common names are always subject to local variations, and they change constantly. Where two names are in common use, they are both mentioned the first time the organism is discussed. Ironically, in recent years scientific names have changed more recently than common names, and the reader concerned about a possible discrepancy in nomenclature should consult the scientific literature. If a significant nomenclatural change has escaped our notice, we apologize. For plants, our primary reference has been The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, edited by James C. Hickman, including the latest lists of errata. Variation from the nomenclature in that volume is due to more recent interpretations, as explained in the text. Certain abbreviations used throughout the text may not be immedi- ately familiar to the general reader; they are as follows: sp., species (sin- gular); spp., species (plural); n.
    [Show full text]
  • San Pablo Bay and Marin Islands National Wildlife Refuges - Refuges in the North Bay by Bryan Winton
    San Pablo Bay NWR Tideline Newsletter Archives San Pablo Bay and Marin Islands National Wildlife Refuges - Refuges in the North Bay by Bryan Winton Editor’s Note: In March 2003, the National Wildlife Refuge System will be celebrating its 100th anniversary. This system is the world’s most unique network of lands and waters set aside specifically for the conservation of fish, wildlife and plants. President Theodore Roosevelt established the first refuge, 3- acre Pelican Island Bird Reservation in Florida’s Indian River Lagoon, in 1903. Roosevelt went on to create 55 more refuges before he left office in 1909; today the refuge system encompasses more than 535 units spread over 94 million acres. Leading up to 2003, the Tideline will feature each national wildlife refuge in the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex. This complex is made up of seven Refuges (soon to be eight) located throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and headquartered at Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge in Fremont. We hope these articles will enhance your appreciation of the uniqueness of each refuge and the diversity of habitats and wildlife in the San Francisco Bay Area. San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge Tucked away in the northern reaches of the San Francisco Bay estuary lies a body of water and land unique to the San Francisco Bay Area. Every winter, thousands of canvasbacks - one of North America’s largest and fastest flying ducks, will descend into San Pablo Bay and the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge. This refuge not only boasts the largest wintering population of canvasbacks on the west coast, it protects the largest remaining contiguous patch of pickleweed-dominated tidal marsh found in the northern San Francisco Bay - habitat critical to Aerial view of San Pablo Bay NWR the survival of the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern California Distance Running Annual
    1970 NORTHERN C a lifo rn ia distance RUNNING ANNUAL WEST VALLEY TRACK CLUB PUBLICATIONS $2. 00 1970 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTANCE RUNNING ANNUAL A WEST VALLEY TRACK CLUB PUBLICATION EDITOR: JACK LEYDIG 603 SO. ELDORADO ST. SAN MATEO, CALIF. 94402 RICH DELGADO: TOP PA-AAU LONG DISTANCE RUNNER FOR 1970. l CONTENTS PHOTO CREDITS......................... 3 PREFACE.............................. 5 1970 PA-AAU CROSS COUNTRY TEAM.......... 6 HIGHLIGHTS............................. ll WINNERS OF 1970 PA-AAU RACES............ 21 1970 MARATHON LIST.................... 22 THE SENIORS........................... 25 14 AND UNDER.......................... 35 WOMEN................................ 38 CLUBS................................. 44 THE RUNNER'S HELPER..................... 47 A CROSS SECTION....................... 52 HIGH SCHOOL........................... 59 COLLEGIATE............................ 63 CONCLUSION............................ 67 1971 LONG DISTANCE SCHEDULE..............68 PA-AAU CLUB DIRECTORY.................. 71 OTHER IMPORTANT ADDRESSES.............. 74 NOTES................................ 75 ADVERTISEMENTS FOR RUNNING EQUIPMENT 77 PHOTO CREDITS I wish to thank all those individuals who contributed photos for the Annual. Some of those you sent, of course, were not used. We tried to use the best quality photos of those we received, although in some cases we had to make do with what we had. Below is a list of photo credits for each picture in this book. In some cases we didn't know who took the shot, but instead listed the individual
    [Show full text]
  • CALENDAR ITEM Howe AUTHORIZE the PURCHASE with KAPILOFF
    CALENDAR ITEM A 9 61 03127190 '~ 3 W 24425 AD 117 Howe AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE WITH KAPILOFF LANO BANK TRUST FUNDS A PARCEL OF LANO KNOWN AS THE MARIN ISLANDS IN SAN RAFAEL BAY, CITY OF SAN RAFAEL. MARIN COUNTY APPLICANT: State Lands Commission as trustee 9f the Kapiloff Land Bank Fund Staff of the California Coastal Conservancy, Marin Open ~pace District, Fish and Wildlife Service and the Stjte Lands Commission have been considering the purchase of tid~lands apd two islands known as the Marin Islands, located in San Rafael Bay, City of San Rafael, Marin County. These agencies will contribute one-half of the purchase price. It is proposed that the Commission contribute $500,000 toward this -~mount from the Kapiloff Land Bank Fund. Private funding_ will be raised to cover the remaining half of the purchase price. The subject parcel is approximately 339 acres: 32'6 acres are tideland lots located in the bed of San Rafael Bay. The tideland portion of the subjact property is presently unfilled and in a natural condition, and as such, ·remain an integral part of the overall San Francisco Bay estuarine ecosystem., The West Marin Island is 2.90 acres of open space used primarily for nesting purposes by a variety of waterfowl. This island is, uegetated with native grasses and small trees. Due to its isolated location and terrain, the island is a productive rookery For a variety oF water fowl visiting the Bay area. The island has been identified by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service as having the largest heron rookery in San Franci~co Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wildlife Refuge System
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System o 60 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 65 o o 145 145 o 150 155 o 160 165 170 175 E 180 70 175 W 170 165 160 155 150 140 135 130 70 125 120 115 Barrow A E A R C T I S C C O C E A N H R T 30 o U F O Midway Atoll NWR E A U K B e C m iti ar Teshekpuk PACIFIC ISLANDS H H Lake Prudhoe Bay a M w a ai I k ian s 0 200 400 MILES Is a land l 1 s NW S A R E Marianas Trench MNM (Island Unit) 0 300 600 KILOMETERS ) t A i n U R TROPIC OF CANCER o c SCALE 1:29,000,000 i Papahanaumokuakea MNM R n o o 65 a U c Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 7 S and 20 N, Colville l o o Alaska Maritime V S ( central meridian 174 30' E Honolulu Arctic M H S N A 55 W M A o o I 20 h I I c Noatak n A e r T See inset map of s a Hawaii below R n a i A r RC a TIC C M IR C / LE R K R Guam NWR o t Kobuk e W z NORTHERN MARIANA e A in N b p Wake Atoll NWR and l u e u a c r ISLANDS r i e s o k P F Pacific Remote Islands MNM (UNITED STATES) a f t S R o i o M u c a r r n a Selawik A d r Yukon Flats t i Yukon a S ti n m a N i r Johnston Atoll NWR and Alaska Maritime e a Kanuti M A Pacific Remote Islands MNM Mariana Trench NWR / Marianas Trench MNM (Trench Unit) n g E r i R C B e 10 o N M R A O oyukuk R S K H A Koyukuk L L C I S L I Fairbanks A Nome N F Kingman Reef NWR and FED D I ERA S A Nowitna TED Pacific Remote Islands MNM l Tanana STA C Palmyra Atoll NWR and a TES sk A OF a MI A Pacific Remote Islands MNM Innoko D CRO M NE P St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tide Rising Spring 2021 Volume II, Issue 3
    Tide Rising Spring 2021 Volume II, Issue 3 Publisher & Editor: San Francisco Bay Wildlife Society (SFBWS). SFBWS is a not-for-profit Friends Group for the San Francisco Bay NWR Complex, working along with many Refuge volunteers to keep our public lands sustainable for you and wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Endangered & Threatened Species In this issue: Refuge Spotlight: • Learn what our Friends group can do to advocate for the endangered • ENDANGERED SPECIES: Business as Usual in a Pandemic? and threatened species on our Refuge Complex. Find ideas and read an • ENDANGERED SPECIES: Clade X? interview with CORFA President: Coalition of Refuge Friends & Advocates. • See how the Veterans Affairs (VA) Alameda Point staff and volunteers Corners pivoted during the pandemic supporting the least tern, an endangered • SFBWS President Column species on our Refuge. Not quite business as usual. • Volunteers • Discover whether a new species has been found on the Antioch Dunes • Don Edwards Volunteers NWR? Learn more about the evening primrose, Clade X. • North Bay Refuge Volunteers • Volunteers in FY2020: they are the lifeblood of the Refuge Complex. Last • Photography Corner year and a pandemic didn’t stop our USFWS volunteers. • Take a look at the photographs galore this issue! People of Note • Interview with Joan Patterson, Enjoy the San Francisco Bay Wildlife Society SPRING Newsletter! long time Refuge advocate San Francisco Bay Wildlife Society SFBWS Info Editors: Ceal Craig, PhD; Renee Fitzsimons. • Donor Recognition Contributors: Ceal Craig, Mary Deschene, Renee Fitzsimons (SFBWS). • Membership Information Louis Terrezas (USFWS), Meg Marriott (USFWS), Paul Mueller (USFWS), Susan Euing (USFWS), Earth Day 2021 Info Photographers: Ambarish Goswami, Ceal Craig, Cindy Roessler, Joanne Ong, Louis Terrazas, Say Zhee Lim, S.
    [Show full text]
  • By April Thygeson
    Color Page “The Voice of the Waterfront” April 2012 Vol.13, No.4 Opening Day on the Bay American Spirit at Annual Bash 40,000 Miles of Water World Racers to Stop in Oakland A Very Clean Marina Initiative Takes on Raw Sewage Complete Ferry Schedules for all SF Lines Color Page TASTING ROOM OPEN DAILY FROM 11AM TO 6PM TASTE, TOUR RELAX Just a short ferry ride across San Francisco Bay lies the original urban winery, Rosenblum Cellars. Alameda is our urban island with no pretension. Our tasting room is a true gem, with a rustic urban charm that attracts fans from around the world to enjoy the unique, relaxed atmosphere. TWO FOR ONE TASTING with this ad. $10 value www.rosenblumcellars.com 2900 Main St. Suite 1100 Alameda, CA 1-877-GR8-ZINS Please enjoy our wines responsibly. © 2011 Rosenblum Cel Alameda, CA www.DrinkiQ.com 2 April 2012 www.baycrossings.com columns features 05 WHO’S AT THE HELM? 12 OPENING DAY Captain Chuck Elles Catch the Spirit at 95th by Matt Larson Annual Celebration by April Thygeson 11 08 BAYKEEPER Clean Boat Repair Tips 14 GREEN PAGES guides by Deb Self Clean Marina Initiative Puts Brakes on Sewage WATERFRONT ACTIVITIES 22 Our recreational resource guide 09 SAILING ADVENTURES by Bill Picture The Marin Islands 24 WETA FERRY SCHEDULES by Captain Ray news Be on time for last call AROUND THE BAY 20 CULTURAL CURRENTS 04 511 Transit Info App 26 To see, be, do, know Destination: L.A. Debuts for Smartphones by Paul Duclos by Craig Noble ON OUR COVER 06 WATERFRONT NEWS Foreign Trade Drives April 2012 Volume 13, Number 4 Growth at Bay Ports Bobby Winston, Proprietor by Patrick Burnson Joyce Aldana, President Joel Williams, Publisher Patrick Runkle, Editor Around-the-World Racers ADVERTISING & MARKETING 10 Joel Williams, Advertising & Marketing Director to Make Stop in Oakland GRAPHICS & PRODUCTION Francisco Arreola, Designer / Web Producer AMERICA’S CUP ART DIRECTION 16 Francisco Arreola; Patrick Runkle; Joel Williams Final Agreement with S.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tideline Winter04 Color
    Winter 2004-2005 Volume 24, Number 4 In the Trenches with Invasive Spartina Coastal Conservancy Program says Alameda County Flood Control Districtʼs Launches Bay-wide Assault Saul Ferdan. “At least now thereʼs a little less probability that the areas we cleared this year on Hearty Marsh Invader will be completely reinfested by seed from a By Peggy Olofson neighborʼs untreated marsh.” Beleaguered marsh managers and con- Origin of the invasion cerned environmentalists found reason for Four species of non-native Spartina were Map of 2004 Spartina renewed optimism, and even some celebration, introduced to the San Francisco Estuary in the Treatment Sites this fall. After years of disheartening delays and Continued on page 2 ISP chart frustration, a coordinated regional attack on non-native Spartina, an invasive cordgrass that has established in the San Francisco Bay, finally got underway. On September 2, 2004 with the signing of the last environmental authorizations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project (ISP), a program of the State Coastal Conservancy, launched an attack on 450 acres of tenacious weeds present in the Bay. “If we had done this work two years ago,” laments ISP Field Operations Manager Erik Grijalva, “weʼd have knocked out most of the non-native Spartina population in the Bay!” As it is, Grijalva and the ISP partners are well aware that they have a tough battle ahead of them for the next several years. Although 450 acres may seem like a monumental battlefield, it is only 23% of what is actually out there.
    [Show full text]