DOCSLIB.ORG

Safety Audit Report Card Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safety Audit Report Card Summary SAFETY AUDIT REPORT CARD SUMMARY AUDIT DATE: October 10, 2013 AUDIT GROUP: Community members living in Dorset Park AUDIT AREA: Dorset Park, Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. Ward 40 – Scarborough - Agincourt Neighbourhood 119 – Wexford/Maryvale EXECUTIVE SUMMARY METRAC’s Safety Audit looks at how social and physical environments can make an area safe or unsafe. METRAC defines safety as ‘freedom from the threat, fear, and experience of all forms of violence, oppression, and discrimination.’ The Community Safety Audit was organized by the Dorset Park Community Hub, Tenants Involved Educated and Ready to Respond (TIERR) program. Two audits were conducted on October 10, 2013 at 1:30pm in the afternoon. One audit was carried out on Kennedy Rd. north of Ellesmere Rd. and the other audit was conducted in the area south-west of Kennedy Rd and Ellesmere Rd. The audit aimed to particularly address some of the traffic concerns raised by residents in the neighbourhood. Thirteen individuals participated in the two audits. Ward 40 has a higher population of people whose ages are: less than 5 (5.7%), 5-9 (5.1%), 15-19 (5.9%), 45-49 (8.2%), 65-69 (4.3%), 70-74 (4.1%), 75-79 (3.8%), 80-84 (3.1%), and 85+ (2.8%) compared to the City’s averages of 5.4%, 4.9%, 5.7%, 7.9%, 3.9%, 3.3%, 2.8%, 2.3%, and 2.1%, respectively.1 The Ward has a higher population of visible minorities (69.3%) compared with the City at 46.9%.2 The Ward has a higher population of people living in apartment buildings of 5 or more storeys (48.7%) compared to the City at 41%.3 The top safety priorities identified by participants were as follows: Street lighting on Delbert Dr. Right turn and pedestrian crossing at Dundalk Dr. and Ellesmere Rd. Electrical wires on Ellesmere Rd. Jay walking along Kennedy Rd. No signage near construction areas along Kennedy Rd. Lack of visibility between buildings due to lack of lighting 1 http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toronto/city_planning/wards/files/pdf/profile-ward40-2011.pdf 2 http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toronto/city_planning/wards/files/pdf/ward40_2006profiles.pdf 3 http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toronto/city_planning/wards/files/pdf/profile-ward40-2011.pdf Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 1 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 SAFETY PRIORITIES AREA PRIORITIES RECOMMENDATIONS Kennedy Rd 1. Street lighting on Delbert Dr. Contact City Councillor and Ellesmere There is not enough street about adding additional Rd. lighting on Delbert Dr. lighting on Delbert Dr. 2. Right turn and pedestrian Contact City Councillor and crossing at Dundalk Dr. and the City transportation Ellesmere Rd. department about adding Drivers do not see an additional stop or yield pedestrians while turning sign for drivers so they are right at Dundalk Dr. and aware of pedestrians. Ellesmere Rd. 3. Electrical wires on Ellesmere Contact 311 and City Rd. Councillor to clean up Electrical wires were on electrical wires. the ground on the south west side of Ellesmere between Kennedy Rd. and Wye Valley Rd. 4. Jay walking on Kennedy Rd. Contact City Councillor and Many people jay walk the City transportation across Kennedy Rd. department about possibility of adding crosswalks where most people are jay walking. 5. No signs near construction Contact construction areas along Kennedy Rd. company and City Construction areas along Councillor about the need Kennedy Rd do not have for more signage near enough signs for drivers construction sites. and pedestrians. 6. Lack of visibility between the Contact City Councillor and buildings due to lack of property managers of lighting buildings about installing Need more lighting between more consistent lighting buildings to increase between buildings. visibility. Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 2 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 WALKABOUT PHOTO SUMMARY Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 3 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 OVERVIEW OF SAFETY AUDIT RESULTS The information below is based on the results of the survey and comments made during the safety audit walkabout. Recommendations for action were both stated by participants and based on their concerns. A - Very Good B - Good C - Ok D - Substandard F– Poor GENERAL B- More than half of the participants (66.7%) stated they feel safe in the area, while 33.3% stated they IMPRESSIONS sometimes feel safe in the area. Half of the participants (50%) stated they felt safe in the area alone, while the other half (50%) stated they sometimes feel safe alone in the area. Many participants stated they feel safe leaving their home after dark, while some stated they do not feel safe. More than half of participants (55.6%) stated they sometimes avoid doing activities in the community because they feel unsafe. While 44.4% stated they do not avoid doing activities. Some participants stated they generally feel safe in the area, while one person stated they feel unsafe due to their “colour/race” and another person stated they do not feel safe because they usually go out with their children and they are the only adult. Some participants (44.4%) stated there are specific areas where they feel unsafe, while 11.1% stated there are areas where they sometimes feel unsafe. These areas included: Dim spaces on the road and sidewalk Areas where signs are not visible Glamorgan 6 parking lot, as there is a lot of people who smoke and gather in that area Bus stops on street and subway stops Antrim Crescent Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 4 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 A - Very Good B - Good C - Ok D - Substandard F– Poor SAFETY GRADE SAFETY CONCERNS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION CONTACT FEATURES LIGHTING C+ Some participants (37.5%) stated that Ensure lighting is consistent , and that all Contact property the lighting in the area is good, while lights are working and bright throughout manager to ensure all another 37.5% stated lighting is not the area including in the following areas: lights on property are good and 25% of participants were - Kennedy Rd between Ellesmere working, including unsure if the lighting is good. Rd and Brigstock Rd near buildings and - On Kennedy Rd the space plazas. A majority of participants (87.5%) between 2 buildings stated that there are broken lights or - On Dundalk, pathway between Ensure paths, signs areas that need more lighting. the back of the townhouses and entrances are - Areas between strip mall plazas well lit. More than half of the participants - Increased lighting on Delbert Dr. (62.5%) stated they know who to call as there are only 2 street lights Report lights that when lights are out/broken, while for the entire road need to be replaced 37.5% stated they did not. - Dundalk Dr. on public property at - In the walkway this website: More than half of participants (62.5%) - On the streets https://www.toronto stated they were unsure if lights are - More lighting in between traffic hydro.com/sites/elect blocked by trees and/or bushes, while light signs ricsystem/residential/ 25% stated they are blocked and customercare/pages/ 12.5% stated that lights are not Ensure that trees and bushes are not reportastreetlightout. blocked by trees and/or bushes. blocking lights, particularly on Wye aspx Valley Rd. and along walkways. Half of the participants (50%) stated Contact Councillor to that paths and sidewalks are well lit, Ensure all paths and sidewalks are well request more lighting while 37.5% stated they are not and lit. on Kennedy Rd., Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 5 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 12.5% were unsure. Ensure all signs are well lit in the area. Delbert Dr., walkways and near signs in Some participants (37.5%) stated signs area. and maps are not well lit, while another 37.5% stated they are, and 25% were unsure. SIGNS and B- Many participants stated there are Ensure that all signs are easy to see, read Contact Councillor MAPS enough signs identifying the area. and understand, written in clear and regarding the need large enough font, and in locations that for additional signs as More than half of participants (62.5%) are easy to see. noted. stated signs and maps are easy to see and find, while 25% stated they are not Ensure there are emergency signs easy to see and find. throughout buildings and parks in area. Many participants stated signs and Add the following signs: maps are easy to read and understand. - Signs to caution against jaywalking near heavy traffic More than half of participants (62.5%) areas stated there are no signs showing - More signs in construction zones where to go for help in emergencies, - Yield to pedestrians while some participants (25%) were - Exit door signs with brighter unsure if there are signs. lighting - Bigger signs for elderly Half of participants (50%) were unsure if emergency exits were easy to find in buildings, while 37.5% stated they are easy to find. Safety Audit Report Card – Kennedy Rd. and Ellesmere Rd. 6 Audit conducted on 10th of October 2013 TRAFFIC C+ More than half of participants (62.5%) Assess the need for more crosswalks and Contact stated area needs more crosswalks/ traffic lights in the following areas: transportation traffic lights, while 37.5% were unsure. - Along Kennedy Rd between services at the City to Many participants (62.5%) stated Progress Ave. and Ellesmere Rd. assess for more traffic in the area is not too fast, while - A flashing light between crosswalks, traffic 25% were unsure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Scarborough
    ~THE SCARf>OROUGH PuBLIC LIBF{\RY I BOARP THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH Map of Scarborough ,.; .; .,; ::. .,; .,; .,; "'""- :;, -< "" -< "" "" 'ti "" "" S.teele~ Ave. V IV Finch Avenue III Sileppail.d Ave. 11 D St. REFERENCE POINTS 1. Thomson Park Z. Bluffer's Park J 3. civic Centre 4. Kennedy Subway 5. Metro Zoo Ikml 6. Guild Inn 1 mile! Map of Scarborough courtesy of Rick Schofield, Heritage Scarborough THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Copyright© The City of Scarborough Public Library Board 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise for purposes of resale. Published by The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Grenville Printing 25 Scarsdale Rd. Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2R2 Raku ceramic Bicentennial Collector Plate and cover photo by Tom McMaken, 1996. Courtesy of The City of Scarborough. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Myrvold, Barbara The People of Scarborough: a history Includes index. ISBN 0-9683086-0-0 1. Scarborough (Ont.) - History. I. Fahey, Curtis, 1951- . II Scarborough Public Library Board. III. Title. FC3099.S33M97 1997 971.3'541 C97-932612-5 F1059.5.T686S35 1997 iv Greetings from the Mayor As Mayor of the City of Scarborough, and on behalf of Members of Council, I am pleased that The People of Scarborough: A History, has been produced. This book provides a chronological overview of the many diverse peoples and cultures that have contributed to the city's economic, cultural and social fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Services Funding Agencies
    TO Support Cluster Service Area Agency Name Allocation Amount Communities Being Served Emergency Food Community Kitchens Kingston Rd/Galloway, Orton Park, and West Scarborough East Scarborough Boys and Girls Club $ 327,600.00 Hill communities (Wards 23, 24, 25), plus extended service to Wards 20 and 22. Primarily east Toronto and Scarborough 5N2 Kitchen within the boundaries of DVP and Woodbine, East Toronto and Scarborough $ 99,600.00 Danforth, Finch and Port Union; also delivering to vulnerable populations Downtown East and West, Regent Park, Downtown; Scarborough; Etobicoke Kitchen 24 $ 96,000.00 Scarborough, North Etobicoke Hospitality Workers Training Centre Downtown; Scarborough $ 78,000.00 South East Toronto (HWTC, aka Hawthorn Kitchen) Toronto Drop-in Network ( 51 Various locations across the City, City-wide $ 140,564.00 agencies) concentration downtown City-wide FoodShare $ 150,000.00 Various NIAs, especially Tower Communities Downtown West, High Park, and Downtown Toronto Feed It Forward $ 72,000.00 Parkdale Across Toronto serving those with mental City-Wide Bikur Cholim $ 10,000.00 health conditions, & vulnerable seniors African (East and West, Caribbean) and Black communities in Black Creek Black Creek Community Health Humber Summit cluster area, Glenfield- North Etobicoke $ 60,000.00 Centre Jane Heights, Kingsview Village- The Westway, Beaumonde Heights, Mt. Olive- Silverstone-Jamestown Community Food Providers City-wide Daily Bread Food Bank $ 150,000.00 City-wide Second Harvest $ 150,000.00 City-wide Salvation Army $ 150,000.00
    [Show full text]
  • Community Hubs & Climate Change: a Feasibility Assessment
    Community Hubs & Climate Change A Feasibility Assessment December 2018 Acknowledgements Principal Authors This project is a collaboration between Enviromentum, Emmay Mah the Toronto Community Benefits Network and the Dusha Sritharan Toronto Environmental Alliance. Shannon Holness The community hubs that play a vital role in our Co-Authors neighbourhoods are the inspiration for this work. We Vince Schutt would like to thank the staff and residents from the Winnie Lin following hubs and organizations for taking time to Arunemathi Shanmugam share their insights, ideas and hopes: Bathurst-Finch Unison Hub, Bathurst-Finch Social Action Group, Report Design & Layout Dorset Park Community Hub, East Scarborough Rekha Sadasivan Storefront, Jane-Finch Hub, Malvern Family Resource Patrick Roycroft Centre, Mid-Scarborough Hub, North Etobicoke Resident Council, PARC, Rexdale Community Hub, and the Victoria Community Hub Graphic Park Hub. Alexander Miranda We would like to thank The Atmospheric Fund (TAF) for making this project possible. TAF invests in urban solutions in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) to reduce carbon emissions and air pollution. We share their vision for a climate-smart urban region that functions within its environmental means and is a leader among climate-friendly urban centres around the world. We would specifically like to thank Mary Pickering, Ian Klesmer, and Diana Yoon for their ongoing support and advice as part of this project. This feasibility assessment was funded by The Atmospheric Fund. Finally, we would like to thank our key advisors, Paul Antze and Rosemarie Powell, for sharing their expertise and knowledge to inform the scope of this project. We hope the stories of these hubs will inspire you as much as they have inspired us! 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 11 Special Policy Areas
    HWY 401 . CAMPBELL YORK MILLS WELLESLEY [email protected] BAYVIEW OLD YONGE HIGHLAND RIVER DON CARLTON YONGE PLYMBRIDGE SHERBOURNE GERRARD JARVIS PARLIAMENT GREENWOOD BROADVIEW JONES LOGAN CARLAW WOODFIELD PAPE LESLIE BAYVIEW DUNDAS S DONWOODS D O O DONW ELLESMERE YONGE QUEEN RICHMOND ADELAIDE 6 Hoggs Hollow: Don River - West Branch KING DVP EASTERN BAY FRONT TOWER WEST HIGHLAND CREEK DON RIVER WEST BRANCH ELLINGTON LAKE SHORE GARDINER EXPWY N VICTORIA PARK VICTORIA PHARMACY A BIRCHMOUNT WARDEN KENNEDY T MIDLAND BRIMLEY T QUEENS QUAY A COMMISSIONERS H N A M CHERRY HWY 401 LAWRENCE TORONTO INNER HARBOUR CREEK TAYLOR/MASSEY 7 Lower Don: Don River UNWIN TORONTO OUTER HARBOUR RANSTONE ELLESMERE CANADIAN BERTRAND DORSET PARK BRANCH BIRCHMOUNT KENNEDY MIDWEST WARDEN MIDLAND NANTUCKET ASHTONBEE BRIMLEY 8 Eglinton-Birchmount: Taylor/Massey Creek EGLINTON WOODFERN B E N D AL E BRANCH LAWRENCE SHEPPARD BIRCHMOUNT MIDLAND WARDWN KENNEDY BRIMLEY M c PRUDENTIAL MARKHAM BRANCH COWAN The City of Toronto strives to adhere to the accepted guidelines and standards for accessibility and usability. However, it is not always possible to do so with all documents. Should you experience any difficulty reviewing our documents, please email 9 Ellesmere-Midland: Highland Creek - Dorset Park Branch MARCOS HWY 401 TARA City Planning Division PROGRESS Special Policy Areas 10 401-Midland: Highland CreekELLESMERE - Bendale Branch D O R S E T P A R K IN T E RC EPT Decision by O.M.B. not yet determined OR Not to Scale Special Policy Areas MAP 11 2of2 Area Specific Maps June 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meadoway Multi-Use Trail Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Schedule C Environmental Study Report
    The Meadoway Multi-Use Trail Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Schedule C Environmental Study Report Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority in partnership with the City of Toronto December 12, 2019 This page is intentionally left blank THE MEADOWAY MULTI-USE TRAIL MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – SCHEDULE C Environmental Study Report Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority in partnership with the City of Toronto (co-proponent) December 12, 2019 101 Exchange Avenue Vaughan ON L4K 5R6 Disclaimer: The data used to create maps in this report were compiled from a variety sources and dates. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) takes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the data and retains the right to make changes and corrections at any time without notice. For further information about the data on maps in this report, please contact the TRCA Information GIS Department 416.661.6600. Data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry is copyright, Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Other data provided or used is copyright by their respective owners. This page is intentionally left blank Acknowledgements Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and City of Toronto gratefully acknowledge the efforts and contributions of the following people participating in the planning and design phases of The Meadoway Multi-use Trail Class Environmental Assessment: Celene Mariano Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Corey Wells Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Child & Family Inequities Score
    CHILD & FAMILY INEQUITIES SCORE Technical Report The Child & Family Inequities Score provides a neighbourhood-level measure of the socio-economic challenges that children and families experience. The Child & Family Inequities Score is a tool to help explain the variation in socio-economic status across the City of Toronto neighbourhoods. It will help service providers to understand the context of the neighbourhoods and communities that they serve. It will also help policy makers and researchers understand spatial inequities in child and family outcomes. While other composite measures of socio-economic status in the City exist, the Child & Family Inequities Score is unique because it uses indicators that are specific to families with children under the age of 12. The Child & Family Inequities Score is a summary measure derived from indicators which describe inequities experienced by the child and family population in each of Toronto’s 140 neighbourhoods. The Child & Family Inequities Score is comprised of 5 indicators: • Low Income Measure: Percent of families with an after-tax family income that falls below the Low Income Measure. • Parental Unemployment: Percent of families with at least one unemployed parent / caregiver. • Low Parental Education: Percent of families with at least one parent / caregiver that does not have a high school diploma. • No Knowledge of Official Language: Percent of families with no parents who have knowledge of either official language (English or French). 1 • Core Housing Need: Percent of families in core housing need . This report provides technical details on how the Child & Family Inequities Score was created and describes how the resulting score should be interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Neighbourhoods: a Call to Action
    strong neighbourhoods A Call to Action... A Report of the Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . 3 Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force . 4 Strong Neighbourhoods - A Call to Action 1. Our Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal . 5 2. Strong Neighbourhoods Matter . 9 3. Investment to Strengthen Neighbourhoods . 15 4. Identifying Neighbourhoods for Investment . 18 5. Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy . 27 6. Moving Forward . 35 References . 38 Appendix 1: Toronto Neighbourhoods Map . 40 Appendix 2: List of Background Research Papers Commissioned by the Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force . 41 The Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force wishes to acknowledge with gratitude the financial support of the Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario. Foreword The Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force is pleased to release its report – We call on all governments to respond quickly to our proposed Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods – A Call to Action. This report is the culmination Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy. We urge them to implement the key compo- of a year’s work that focused on an issue which is vital to the future health nents of the strategy: an intergovernmental agreement to ensure coordinated and prosperity of our city – namely, how to restore the strength of our investment; a commitment for new targeted resources and mechanisms to city’s neighbourhoods. support local resident leadership and participation. Our Task Force was comprised of civic leaders from the private, labour, Strong neighbourhoods mean safer streets, engaged, active residents, and voluntary, and public sectors in the City of Toronto. Together, we recognize ultimately, a more prosperous economy. This benefits everyone in Toronto. The the importance of strong neighbourhoods to Toronto’s standing as a world- responsibility to strengthen Toronto neighbourhoods does not rest exclusively class city, and together, we are committed to mobilizing the attention and with governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Data by Neighbourhood
    Toronto Data by Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Name Median Income Rate per 100,000 people The Beaches 100365 60.28 St.Andrew-Windfields 98420 61.76 Mount Pleasant East 93566 83.46 Greenwood-Coxwell 70574 97.11 East End-Danforth 69026 102.90 Banbury-Don Mills 77547 108.32 Rosedale-Moore Park 106740 109.93 Willowdale East 61920 111.04 Lambton Baby Point 84414 112.71 South Riverdale 76172 114.79 Lawrence Park North 144963 116.38 Newtonbrook East 93566 118.03 Yonge-Eglinton 80896 118.47 Leaside-Bennington 126930 118.85 Steeles 66179 121.84 Danforth-East York 81253 122.24 Danforth 72597 124.15 Bayview Village 67355 126.19 Lansing-Westgate 80384 129.92 Woodbine Corridor 65829 135.56 Milliken 65861 139.24 North Riverdale 89063 142.67 Lawrence Park South 151885 151.53 Pleasant View 70189 151.73 Humewood-Cedarvale 61440 153.15 L'Amoreaux 59445 154.57 Runnymede-Bloor West Village 112128 158.89 Niagara 79441 160.36 Markland Wood 86965 161.08 Bay Street Corridor 48737 166.69 Yonge-St.Clair 80136 167.62 Blake-Jones 64483 168.24 Parkwoods-Donalda 65126 169.52 Princess-Rosethorn 139039 171.93 Bridle Path-Sunnybrook-York Mills 215798 172.67 Playter Estates-Danforth 73216 179.40 Stonegate-Queensway 85138 183.63 Old East York 77824 184.12 Toronto Data by Neighbourhood Palmerston-Little Italy 71168 188.05 High Park-Swansea 82753 188.09 Dovercourt-Wallace Emerson- Junction 64331 191.13 Don Valley Village 63997 192.23 High Park North 68116 194.03 Kingsway South 151552 194.15 Little Portugal 66542 199.24 Agincourt South-Malvern West 61992 206.25 Casa Loma 93022
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Aurora Sheppard's Bush Conservation Area Ringwood Preston Lake Sheldon Creek Schomberg Heights Violet Hill Kettleby White Rose Bethesda Distribution of Fish Sheldon ¤£50 Snowball Simeon Lake Mill Hill Nottawasaga River Loretto Bruce Creek Species at Risk Keenansville Beeton Creek Cherry Haynes Lake Bruce's Mill Conservation Area Mono Hills Elder Keenansville Creek The Pinnacles Pottageville St. George Lake Athlone Tottenham Pottageville Airfield Wilcox Lake Toronto and Region Colgan Schomberg Gormley Tottenham Pond Holland River Happy Valley Quaker Almira Nottawa Hill Piper Hill Tottenham Conservation Area Berczy Creek Conservation Authority Lloydtown Relessey Dunns Hill Rich Hill Recreation Island Eversley Oak Ridges Heise Hill Cashel (Map 1 of 3) McCarston's Lake Mary Lake Bond Lake Mono Cliffs Provincial Park Achill East Humber River Rouge River Hockley Philips Lake 404 Cedarville Kelly Lake Hackett Lake Heritage Park ¤£ Victoria Square Gulley Hill Linton Thompson Lake Mono Centre Black Horse Holland River King City Cachet Clearview Heights Hall Lake New Scotland Thompson Lake Bell's Lake Strange Kinghorn Palgrave Station Kennifick Lake Connor Mount Wolfe Elgin Mills Berczy Creek Ballycroy Nobleton Airfield Laskay Lucille Toogood Pond Headford Hammertown Unionville Woodside Bailey Creek Gibson Lake Buttonville Humber River Hockley Valley Provincial Nature Reserve Park Holly Park German Mills Creek Palgrave Don River West Branch Buttonville Airport Glen Cross Beaver Creek Palgrave Conservation Area Don River East Branch Richmond
    [Show full text]
  • (# of Nias Per Table) Scarborough Village, Woburn, Kingston
    TORONTO STRONG NEIGHBOURHOOD TEAM Manager: John P. Smith, Phone: 416.206.1554, Email: [email protected] NEIGHBOURHOOD IMPROVEMENT AREAS PLANNING TABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CELL EMAIL OFFICERS (*Includes SDFA Hub) (# of NIAs per Table) Scarborough Village, Woburn, Kingston Galloway/Orton Park (West Hill), Mornelle Court South East Scarborough NIA Planning Table (4) Sherry Phillips 416-892-3119 [email protected] (Morningside) Taylor Massey/Oakridge Taylor Massey/Oakridge NAP (2) Janvere Lyder 647-216-2152 [email protected] Downsview Rodding Downsview Roding NAP (1) Eglinton East / Kennedy Park/Birchmount Eglinton Kennedy Eglinton Progressive Engagement East (Ionview) Collaborative (3) Nathan Stern 416-206-1552 [email protected] Victoria Village, Thorncliffe Park, Flemingdon Park Don Valley NIAs (3) Weston, Mount Dennis, Beechborough Greenbrook, York South Weston NIA Partners (4) Keelesdale Eglinton Melody Brown 416-894-3819 [email protected] Rockcliffe Smythe Rockcliffe Smythe NAP (1) Rustic Rustic NAP (1) Weston Pelham Park Weston Pelham Park NAP (1) Tonya Hopkinson 416-320-8636 [email protected] Kingsview Village-The Westway Kingsview Village The Westway NAP (1) Humbermede, Elms-Old Rexdale, Thistletown- Beaumoud Heights, Mount Olive-Silverstone- Rexdale NAP (5) Wayne Robinson 416-206-1553 [email protected] Jamestown, Humber Summit Parkdale Community Economic Development Project South Parkdale (1) Rebecca Bassey 416-895-9230 [email protected] Regent Park Social Development Plan Stakeholders Table (1) Black Creek/Jane Glenfield Heights Jane Finch TSNS Task Force (2) York University Heights York University Heights NAP (1) Rosemary Bell 416-889-1285 [email protected] Emerging Neighbourhoods: Dorset Park, Malvern, Steeles, L’Amoreaux, Westminster Branson, Yorkdale Glen Park/Englemount Lawrence, Humber Heights-Westmount Melodie Anderson Community Hub Keele Street Hub* 416-392-2981 [email protected] Coordinator.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Immigration Partnership South Scarborough
    LOCAL IMMIGRATION PARTNERSHIP (LIP) SOUTH SCARBOROUGH D orset P ark • K ing ston‐ G alloway/O rton P ark • S carboroug h V illag e Recommendations for a Local Settlement Strategy Final Report January 2011 Funded by Local Immigration Partnership South Scarborough Local Immigration Partnership South Scarborough A participatory, community and strengths‐based approach to better serve newcomers to Canada Lead Agency: Catholic Crosscultural Services LIP South Scarborough serves the following three City of Toronto neighbourhoods: Dorset Park Kingston‐Galloway/Orton Park Scarborough Village The LIP South Scarborough Team Irmtraud Hutfless, LIP Program Manager Anna Kim, LIP Program Worker for Dorset Park Yumna Nabi, LIP Program Worker for Kingston‐Galloway/Orton Park Lakshmi Rajan, LIP Program Worker for Scarborough Village We gratefully acknowledge funding support from Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Recommendations for a Local Settlement Strategy 2 Local Immigration Partnership South Scarborough ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document reflects the outcome of an intensive and exciting process that included the contributions and commitment of many individuals and organizations who shared their knowledge and enthusiasm for developing a collaborative vision for newcomers in the City of Toronto neighbourhoods of Dorset Park, Kingston Galloway/Orton Park and Scarborough Village. First and foremost, our sincere gratitude goes to all newcomers who have shared their stories, experiences, opinions and voices, and who engaged with us in the process of developing ideas and recommendations for enhancing newcomers’ settlement and integration experience in our neighbourhoods. Much appreciation goes out to our Newcomer Ambassadors, whon have bee a cornerstone to the success of this project. They have been instrumental not only in engaging the authentic voices of newcomers throughout our strategic planning process, but have also worked with us in the strategic planning groups to develop useful recommendations for our Local Settlement Strategy.
    [Show full text]