The Koch Agenda in Colorado: Giving to Academic Institutions to Help Assimilate Colorado’S Youth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Koch Agenda in Colorado: Giving to Academic Institutions to Help Assimilate Colorado’S Youth RR44OOHHECECKK++YYOO MMCCHHOOSSkUkUNNTTAAIINN HHIIGGHH David and Charles Koch are turning states into their own political playgrounds, using their billions to influence policy to suit their business and personal needs, and Colorado is one of the most prolific examples. Together with their network of dark money groups, the Koch brothers are fighting to impose policies that fit their agenda while hurting middle-class Colorado families. In 2014, the Kochs topped the list of the 50 wealthiest billionaires who own property in Aspen’s Pitkin County. Charles and David have used their wealth to push their agenda through their vast network in Colorado, influencing both state and federal matters. The Kochs even made Aspen and Vail locations for their private donor retreats, where they discussed the “threat” of unions, climate regulations, and financial regulations. Their brother, Bill Koch, followed their lead of buying local influence, and created a non-profit solely to persuade Pitkin County to approve new guardrails near his Aspen mansion. Koch Industries operates several businesses in Colorado, where they’ll do whatever is necessary to better their bottom line even if it harms the state or its people. Several Koch entities in Colorado clashed with the EPA for failing to register facilities, violating reporting requirements and for not complying with emission rules. While they claim to advocate against increased state spending, Koch Financial Corp had “more than $80 million in contracts” with Colorado since 1996, including purchase and lease agreements, and even road construction, which they subsequently botched. Americans For Prosperity (AFP) is the most entrenched Koch group in Colorado politics. AFP supported numerous extreme policies, such as the state’s divisive Taxpayer Bill of Rights, and killing the job-sustaining wind production tax credit. AFP- Colorado’s state director pledged in 2014 that AFP would “engage in policy fights at all levels of government” each and every year. AFP meddled in everything from Colorado’s U.S. Senate race down to school board election fights. In 2013, AFP targeted two Democratic state senators in recall elections which were sparked by their votes on gun safety following a mass shooting. AFP spent “significant money” to go after then Senate President John Morse’s “tax and spend polices,” and then Senator Angela Giron’s support for expanding the state’s renewable energy mandates. After the recall election, Morse and Giron’s extreme GOP replacements supported TABOR as well as the Kochs’ self-enriching energy and labor agenda. The LIBRE Initiative, the Kochs’ so called Hispanic outreach group, set up shop in the state, engaging Hispanics in Colorado on issues including school choice and immigration reform; but, to mask their true agenda. LIBRE also ingratiated itself into Colorado Hispanic communities by offering services like tax preparation help, scholarships and wellness check-ups. These public facing efforts hide their true agenda that harms the Latino community including opposing deportation protections, fighting against the minimum wage, and wanting to take away health care benefits. To make inroads into a similarly influential Colorado community, Concerned Veterans for America vowed to expand their Colorado efforts, where nearly 400,000 veterans call home. It was in Colorado that Concerned Veterans for America first proposed privatizing the VA. Another Koch-backed group, The American Legislative Council (ALEC), worked to influence a host of Colorado’s such as a fracking chemical disclosure bill and multiple federal lands transfer bills, all based on ALEC’s model legislation. Colorado has 8.3 million acres of public lands, along with 27 million acres of mineral estate. If the Kochs and ALEC are successful in their bid to take back this public land, they would be able to buy it from the state and use it for their business while spoiling it for everyone else. In 2002, “at least half” of Colorado’s state lawmakers were members of ALEC. During the 2014 U.S. Senate race between Colorado’s Democratic Senator Mark Udall and Republican Rep. Cory Gardner, the Koch network ran over 4,600 ads in the state. Eight Koch groups, including the LIBRE Initiative and Concerned Veterans for America, participated in “issue advocacy” during the election. Freedom Partners Action Fund spent $2.5 million in support of the eventual winner, Gardner. In 2014, Koch Industries and the Koch-funded American Future Fund contributed a combined $800,000 to the Republican Attorneys General Association, which bought $2.6 million worth of TV ads in support of Republican Colorado Attorney General Candidate Cynthia Coffman. The Kochs’ support for Coffman shows their hypocrisy on criminal justice reform— Coffman was against legalizing marijuana, a reform that two Koch-funded groups have pushed to improve criminal justice. Speaking of justice, brother Bill Koch allegedly kidnapped someone in Colorado (make sure to read to the end of the report). The Kochs treat Colorado as a personal, political, and business playground, but the games they play challenge the ability of Coloradans to govern their own state, put at risk the livelihoods of the state’s residents, and jeopardize the natural beauty that defines Colorado. Table of Contents Wealthy Koch Brothers Have Turned The Centennial State Into Their Political Playground .................................................................................................................................................. 1! David & Charles Koch Have Multimillion Dollar Homes In Aspen ........................................................... 6! Koch Brothers’ Private Donor Retreats In Colorado ................................................................................... 8! Koch Industries’ Operations In Colorado ............................................................................... 9! The Koch Agenda In Colorado: Giving To Academic Institutions To Help Assimilate Colorado’s Youth .................................................................................................................. 15! The Koch Agenda In Colorado: Americans For Prosperity .................................................. 16! AFP Was Founded By The Koch Brothers And Has Received Millions From Koch-Allied Dark Money Groups ......................................................................................................................................................... 17! Leadership ................................................................................................................................................... 17! AFP Announced It Was Expanding Its Grass-Roots Infrastructure In The Politically Important Centennial State ........................................................................................................................................... 19! 2013 Recall Election ................................................................................................................................... 20! AFP-Colorado Supported The State’s Flawed Taxpayer Bill Of Rights ................................................... 25! 2011 Colorado Springs Mayoral Race ......................................................................................................... 28! Education ................................................................................................................................................... 29! Energy/Environment ................................................................................................................................. 36! Americans For Prosperity Said That Federal Land Should Be Sold .......................................................... 43! Labor ........................................................................................................................................................... 44! Export-Import Bank ................................................................................................................................... 45! Health Care ................................................................................................................................................ 46! Other AFP-Colorado Lobbying .................................................................................................................. 47! The Koch Agenda In Colorado: American Legislative Exchange Council .......................... 47! ALEC Is Connected To The Kochs ........................................................................................................... 47! ALEC Has Influenced A “Host Of Colorado Laws” ................................................................................. 48! Public Lands ............................................................................................................................................... 49! Energy/Environment .................................................................................................................................. 51! Right To Work ............................................................................................................................................ 54! Education ................................................................................................................................................... 54! Taxpayer Bill Of Rights ............................................................................................................................. 54! Legal
Recommended publications
  • Key Factors to Adopt Paid Family Leave Policies in U.S. States
    KEY FACTORS TO ADOPT PAID FAMILY LEAVE POLICIES IN U.S. STATES Erin M. Abramsohn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Health in the Department of Health Policy and Management in the Gillings School of Global Public Health. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Pam Silberman Asheley Cockrell Skinner Gene Matthews Cathleen Walsh Judy Waxman © 2019 Erin M. Abramsohn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Erin M. Abramsohn: Key Factors to Adopt Paid Family Leave Policies in U.S. States (Under the direction of Pam Silberman) In 2019, The United States remains the only developed nation without a paid family leave policy. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) passed in 1993, grants eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year. However, due to eligibility limitations only 60 percent of U.S. workers qualify for FMLA benefits and only about half of those eligible utilize the program. Many also report shortening the length of unpaid leave they take due to financial constraints. As of December, 2018, only four U.S. states offered paid family leave (California, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and New York). Starting in 2020, Washington state and the District of Columbia will both begin offering paid family and medical leave benefits, and beginning in 2021 Massachusetts will also provide paid family leave benefits. Bills have been introduced (but not passed) in 23 additional states. This study examined the question of why two states (California and New York) were able to pass paid family leave policies, while two other states that made multiple legislative attempts (Colorado and Illinois) failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics (and Related Projects) Berlet, C. (2017). Hayek, Mises, and the Iron Rule of Unintended Consequences. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part IX: Te Divine Right of the ‘Free’ Market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Farrant, A., & McPhail, E. (2017). Hayek, Tatcher, and the Muddle of the Middle. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A Collaborative Biography Part IX the Divine Right of the Market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Filip, B. (2018a). Hayek on Limited Democracy, Dictatorships and the ‘Free’ Market: An Interview in Argentina, 1977. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIII: ‘Fascism’ and Liberalism in the (Austrian) Classical Tradition. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Filip, B. (2018b). Hayek and Popper on Piecemeal Engineering and Ordo- Liberalism. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIV: Orwell, Popper, Humboldt and Polanyi. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Friedman, M. F. (2017 [1991]). Say ‘No’ to Intolerance. In R. Leeson & C. Palm (Eds.), Milton Friedman on Freedom. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s) 2019 609 R. Leeson, Hayek: A Collaborative Biography, Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78069-6 610 Bibliography Glasner, D. (2018). Hayek, Gold, Defation and Nihilism. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIII: ‘Fascism’ and Liberalism in the (Austrian) Classical Tradition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Goldschmidt, N., & Hesse, J.-O. (2013). Eucken, Hayek, and the Road to Serfdom. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A Collaborative Biography Part I Infuences, from Mises to Bartley.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Brothers Exposed: 2014 Edition
    Presents: Koch Brothers Exposed: 2014 Edition A film by Robert Greenwald (56 min., USA, 2013) Language: English Publicity: Linsey Pecikonis Brave New Films Tel: 310-204-0448x225 E-mail: [email protected] High-resolution film stills may be downloaded at http://www.bravenewfilms.org/koch_presskit ABOUT THE FILM In early 2011, Robert Greenwald and the Brave New Films (BNF) staff questioned how to make ordinary Americans care about the activities of David and Charles Koch, billionaire brothers who were spending hundreds of millions of dollars to influence federal, state and local elections. The Koch brothers were not yet in the daily conversations of the average American, but that would change with the 2012 release of BNF’s investigative documentary Koch Brothers Exposed. Originally Greenwald envisioned Koch Brothers Exposed as a series of thirteen short investigative videos that shed light on the Koch political dealings and the negative impact their money has on a variety of aspects of American life. These mini-documentaries immediately went viral, and viewers made it clear to BNF that they wanted more comprehensive coverage of the Koch’s activities. The first edition of the hour-long Koch Brothers Exposed highlighted the Koch’s efforts to gut Social Security by spending more than $28 million to popularize the fiction that the federal program was on the brink of collapse. It also addressed the Koch’s attempts at re-segregating schools in North Carolina; their efforts at voter suppression by supporting misleading voter ID laws; and the disastrous impact of their environmental policies on oil and gas projects and on industrial toxic waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Charles Koch's Brain.Pdf
    “ Was I, perhaps, hallucinating? Or was I, in reality, nothing more than a con man, taking advantage of others?” —Robert LeFevre BY MARK known as “Rampart College”), School] is where I was first exposed which his backers wanted to turn in-depth to such thinkers as Mises AMES into the nation’s premier libertarian and Hayek.” indoctrination camp. Awkwardly for Koch, Freedom What makes Charles Koch tick? There are plenty of secondary School didn’t just teach radical Despite decades of building the sources placing Koch at LeFevre’s pro-property libertarianism, it also nation’s most impressive ideological Freedom School. Libertarian court published a series of Holocaust- and influence-peddling network, historian Brian Doherty—who has denial articles through its house from ideas-mills to think-tanks to spent most of his adult life on the magazine, Ramparts Journal. The policy-lobbying machines, the Koch Koch brothers’ payroll—described first of those articles was published brothers only really came to public LeFevre as “an anarchist figure in 1966, two years after Charles prominence in the past couple of who stole Charles Koch’s heart;” Koch joined Freedom School as years. Since then we’ve learned a Murray Rothbard, who co-founded executive, trustee and funder. lot about the billionaire siblings’ the Cato Institute with Charles “Evenifoneweretoaccept vast web of influence and power in Koch in 1977, wrote that Charles themostextremeand American politics and ideas. “had been converted as a youth to exaggeratedindictment Yet, for all that attention, there libertarianism by LeFevre.” ofHitlerandthenational are still big holes in our knowledge But perhaps the most credible socialistsfortheiractivities of the Kochs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns, Grass, and God's Wrath, Colorado's Budget, Politics, and Elections
    Guns, Grass, and God’s Wrath, Colorado’s Budget, Politics, and Elections Michael J. Berry University of Colorado, Denver I. Introduction At the 2014 Democratic Party Assembly, incumbent Governor John Hickenlooper lamented that no “other state in the union . has been through as much as Colorado has in the past couple of years.” His statement was an implicit reference to a number of recent tragedies in the state. Among the most prominent were the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting, the callous murder of Department of Corrections director Tom Clements in his home in early 2013, and the most dev- astating forest fires and floods to ever hit the state in June and September 2013. Hickenlooper’s statement on the uniqueness of the state, however, could just as easily apply to the state’s politi- cal realm. Colorado received considerable notoriety from the commencement of recreational marijuana sales on January 1, 2014. In a carefully staged photo opportunity, Iraq war veteran, Sean Azzariti, made the first legal recreational marijuana purchase as the state embarked on a grand social ex- periment. The prior year witnessed the first recall elections in state history resulting in the re- moval of two Democratic legislators from office including Senate President John Morse. An ad- ditional state senator facing a strong recall effort resigned under pressure. These highly charged campaigns to remove legislators were in response to the enactment of several controversial gun control laws. The legalization of recreational marijuana and the fight over gun control grabbed the lion’s share of headlines in the state over the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Slick Spin Cycle
    A f c o u ^ ° ) V y j U f* - i p ffljBg o the National Associa- tion of Manufacturers, Koch Indus- tries is among 700 companies and trade groups that make up the AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COALITION, which opposes the EPA's regulations. Run by NAM, the coalition includes Ford, General Motors, and Exxon, and reportedly boasts a $2 million war chest. O IL S L I C K How to choke off clean air with independent expenditures. AQSC’s spokesman C. BOYDEN GRAY David H. Koch, 56, Wichita, Kan. Party: R and Libertarian. (#87) was Bush's W hite House counsel, When the Environmental Protection Agency announced is chair of Citizens for a Sound last November it would update Clean Air Act standards Economy, and is a lawyer at the to ban dust particle emissions that reportedly cause r law firm Wilmer, Cutler & Picker­ 40,000 p Tiatur - deaths annually big industries sharpened ing, where his clients include their knives. (Final EPA regulations are due by July.) Oil Geneva Steel. companies, automakers, and the nation’s largest manufac­ turers claim it will cost them billions to comply. Among them is David Koch, chairman of Koch Industries, whose oil subsidiary is being sued by the government for Clean Water Act violations, for a reported $55 million. Although Koch gave $339,000 to federal campaigns in 1995-96, it’s only one way he sought influence. He also gives through a .7:; - tangled v. eb of think tanks, PR agencies, and trade associa­ I health study linking a tions, all of which want Congress to gut the Clean Air Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros
    Checks and Balances Project Documents: Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros. $192 Million to 72 Groups Associated with Opposition to Clean Energy Solutions and Climate Change Denial from 1997-2013 $108 Million to At Least 19 Groups to Fight State Renewable Energy Policies 2011-2013 (Over 18 months, Checks and Balances Project conducted the first in-depth investigation into Koch Industries, Inc. AND what we call the Koch Advocacy Network. Over 350 low-profile regulatory disclosures and more than 8,000 legal disclosure forms drawn from over 60 public agencies, databases and courts were examined. Research was completed prior to the 2016 election.) In August 2015 President Obama singled out the “massive lobbying efforts backed by fossil fuel interests, or conservative think tanks, or the Koch brothers pushing for new laws to roll back renewable energy standards or prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding.” The President described these anti-clean energy efforts as “rent seeking and trying to protect old ways of doing business and standing in the way of the future.”1 Charles Koch responded that, “We are not trying to prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding” and warned against “subsidizing uneconomical forms of energy — whether you call them ‘green,’ ‘renewable’ or whatever.” He continued, “And there is a big debate on whether you have a real disease or something that’s not that serious. I recognize there is a big debate about that. But whatever it is, the cure is to do things in the marketplace, and to let individuals and companies innovate, to come up with alternatives that will deal with whatever the problem may be in an economical way so we don’t squander resources on uneconomic approaches.” 2 The defense outlined by Charles mirrors the strategy of the network he oversees.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Talks a Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21St Century Plutocrats
    Graduate School Master of Science in Global Studies Major: Political Science Course: SIMV07 Term: Spring 2017 Supervisor: Alexander von Hagen-Jamar Money Talks A Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21st Century Plutocrats Author: Pauliina Parviainen Abstract Plutocracy is a subject that has not traditionally attracted the interest of scholars in the disciplines of International Relations and Political Science. This is unfortunate, as the number and importance of affluent private individuals in global affairs has steadily increased in recent decades. Since most existing academic research on contemporary plutocrats focuses on philanthropists and other ‘benefactors’, this research examines what drives the behaviour of the so-called ‘malefactors’ – in this case, enormously wealthy citizens from the Persian Gulf who fund Islamist extremism and the Koch brothers who fight against climate change mitigation efforts and U.S. government regulations. The research is guided by a realist constructivist hypothesis according to which plutocrats use their material assets to advance ideological causes that in the long run further increase their economic wealth. Qualitative content analysis was performed on select texts that dealt with these actors’ presumable and stated motives. The analysis of the Koch brothers suggested that the logic behind their political adventures closely followed this hypothesis. However, the case of Gulf plutocrats only partially confirmed the hypothesis, as ideological and identity-related reasons prevailed over material considerations in these actors’ motives. Keywords: First Image, Koch, Plutocrat, Realist Constructivism, Terrorism Financing Words: 19 952 Contents: 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research problem and research question 2 1.2 Structure of the thesis 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Koch Interest in Criminal Justice Reform: 97 Indictments for Environmental Violations Prosecution Against Koch Industries
    THE KOCHS’ CRIMINAL JUSTICE PUMP-FAKE Origins Of Koch Interest In Criminal Justice Reform: 97 Indictments For Environmental Violations Prosecution Against Koch Industries THE KOCHS’ “COME TO JESUS” MOMENT ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM WAS PROSECUTION… AGAINST THEM Koch’s “Come To Jesus” Moment On Criminal Justice Reform Involved Their Employees Being Indicted For Violating The Clean Air Act. According to Yahoo News, “The Kochs’ ‘come to Jesus’ moment on criminal justice reform came back in the 1990s, when a handful of their employees at a Corpus Christi, Texas, refinery were indicted for violating the Clean Air Act and other crimes. The charges against the employees were eventually dropped in 2001, but Koch, as a corporate entity, settled with the federal government, pleading guilty to one count of the original 97 and paying millions of dollars in fines. While the Kochs’ critics see this incident as an example of a company rightly being punished for polluting the environment, for Charles Koch and other company officials, it was a wake-up call that the government was over-criminalizing legitimate conduct and over-prosecuting its citizens. Mark Holden, Koch Industries’ top lawyer, said he worried that such scrutiny from the government would have an insidious effect on the company’s culture.” [Yahoo News, 11/12/14] Charles Koch: Koch Industries’ Indictment On 97 Felonies Led To Conclusion That Criminal Justice System Needs Reform. According to the Wichita Eagle, “Of all the contentious history between Koch Industries and the U.S. government, the Corpus Christi, Texas, case from 1995 is the one that Charles Koch remembers most vividly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corrosive Effect of Recall Elections on State Legislative Politics Zachary J
    86.1 SIEGEL_FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 11/14/2014 11:01 AM RECALL ME MAYBE? THE CORROSIVE EFFECT OF RECALL ELECTIONS ON STATE LEGISLATIVE POLITICS ZACHARY J. SIEGEL* For the first time in Colorado’s 137-year history, voters in two districts recalled their state senators from office in September 2013. Although the event prompted significant debate over the controversial gun legislation that sparked the grassroots efforts to trigger the recall elections, discussion generally overlooked the implications of using political recall altogether—implications that concern the very foundation of American democracy: the role of the legislator. This Comment aims to fill that gap, examining politically motivated recalls in the context of state legislatures. Using the recent Colorado examples as a case study, this Comment argues that increased use of the tactic will shake the foundation of state legislative politics. By forcing legislators to consider the chance that they might be recalled after voting on any controversial issue, the tactic upsets the delicate balance between a legislator’s ideal dual-role as a delegate and trustee, thereby distorting legislative decision- making. Additionally, increased use of political recall threatens to create a literal manifestation of the “permanent campaign,” and disproportionately advantage special interest and national groups in state politics. Seeking to address the problems associated with the increased use of this dangerous tactic, this Comment presents three policy recommendations. Two of the recommendations are aimed at preventing politically * J.D. Candidate, 2015, University of Colorado Law School; Executive Editor, University of Colorado Law Review. I would like to thank Carey DeGenaro, Elizabeth Sullivan, Cayla Crisp, Andrew Gomez, Cassady Adams, Alex Haynes, Shannon Kerr, Vanya Akraboff, and Vikrama Chandrashekar for their thoughtful edits.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]
  • Billionaires Tea Party
    1 THE BILLIONAIRES’ TEA PARTY How Corporate America is Faking a Grassroots Revolution [transcript] Barack Obama: This is our moment. This is our time. To reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth that where we are many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope; and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and those who tell us we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes we can. Man on Stage: They’re listening to us. They are taking us seriously, and the message is: It’s our county, and they can have it when they pry it from our cold dead fingers. They work for me! NARRATOR: Where did it all go wrong for Barack Obama and the democrats? After sweeping to power with a promise of hope and change, a citizens uprising called the tea party movement emerged. Their message was “no” to big government spending, “no” to healthcare and climate change legislation, and “no” to Obama himself. Woman: Obama is a communist. He says that he doesn't believe in the constitution. NARRATOR: Then, two years into Obama’s presidency, tea party endorsed candidates emerged to sweep the republicans to victory in the House of Representatives. Male News Reader: 32% of the candidates that were elected last night across this country are affiliated with the Tea Party movement. Rand Paul: There's a Tea Party tidal wave, and we're sending a message to 'em. Female Reporter: And they see it as a repudiation of the President and his policies.
    [Show full text]