DOCSLIB.ORG

Mecsek – Dráva Waste Management Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mecsek – Dráva Waste Management Program MECSEK-DRÁVA WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJEKT - NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT – - ANNEX III OF THE APPLICATION FORM – - KEOP-1.1.1. Pécs, January 2008 Expected Environmental Impacts of Mecsek-Dráva Project –Summary Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND............................................................................. 6 2 REGULATION OF INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING IN THE EU AND IN HUNGARY........................................................................................................ 11 2.1. The permitting procedure in Hungary as carried out by the authorities................... 11 2.2. Short description of the planned activity.................................................................. 15 3 TECHNICAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSED .......................................................... 17 3.1 Project Alternatives.................................................................................................. 17 3.1.1 Zero Alternative................................................................................................ 17 4 COMPONENTS OF THE SELECTED SYSTEM - GENERAL DESCRIPTION.. 19 4.1. Waste Collection and Transportation System .......................................................... 19 4.1.1 Container parks................................................................................................ 21 4.1.2 Transfer Stations .............................................................................................. 21 4.2 Collection District.................................................................................................... 22 4.3 Pre-treatment and Disposal of Wastes ..................................................................... 25 4.3.1 Sorting facilities ............................................................................................... 25 4.3.2 Mechanical Preparation Plant......................................................................... 26 4.3.3 Composting....................................................................................................... 26 4.3.4 Landfill ............................................................................................................. 27 4.3.5 Energy Recovery .............................................................................................. 27 4.3.6 Disposal of Hazardous Waste Generated by the Population........................... 27 5 CURRENT STATUS OF THE ANALYSED REGION, FACTORS OF SENSITIVITY ........................................................................................................................ 28 5.1. Major Economic and Geographical Characteristics of the Region Affected by the Waste Management Program ............................................................................................... 28 5.2. Environmental Sensitivity, Threatened Values of the Region Affected by Waste Management......................................................................................................................... 33 5.1.1 Protected natural values .................................................................................. 34 5.1.2 Areas to be Emphasized from the Aspect of Water Base Protection................ 52 6 DESCRIPTION OF EACH WASTE TREATMENT PLANT AND FACILITIES 59 6.1 Regional Waste Treatment Centre in Pécs-Kökény................................................. 59 6.1.1 Facilities and Capacity of the Technology Intended to be Implemented ......... 60 6.1.2 Detailed Description of the Function Based Facilities and Technologies....... 61 6.1.2.1 Mechanical Biological Waste Treatment (MBT) Hall ............................ 61 6.1.2.2 MBT Center Technology ............................................................................. 62 6.1.2.3 Residual bio-waste composting.................................................................... 66 6.1.2.4 Composting Facility (on top of the recultivated area in Phase I)................. 67 6.1.2.5 Material recycling facility ............................................................................ 68 6.1.2.6 Waste Landfill.............................................................................................. 70 6.1.2.7 Technology of Landfilling ........................................................................... 72 6.2 Ancillary Facilities................................................................................................... 73 6.2.1 Gatehouse, Access Control System .................................................................. 73 Expected Environmental Impacts of Mecsek-Dráva Project –Summary 6.2.2 Parking Lots ..................................................................................................... 73 6.2.3 Social (Sanitary) Building................................................................................ 73 6.2.4 Covered Machinery Shed ................................................................................. 74 6.2.5 Biogas Treatment Facility................................................................................ 74 6.2.6 Weigh-bridge, Balance Housing ...................................................................... 74 6.2.7 New Swale System ............................................................................................ 74 6.2.8 Leakage water Purification Equipment............................................................ 75 6.2.9 Inner Roads Interconnecting the Facilities, Sidewalks, Public Utilities, Area Monitoring Systems.......................................................................................................... 75 6.2.10 Car Wash.......................................................................................................... 75 6.2.11 Fuel Filling Station .......................................................................................... 75 6.3 Waste Management Centre in Barcs ........................................................................ 76 6.3.1 Material recycling facility................................................................................ 77 6.3.2 Container park ................................................................................................. 78 6.3.3 Transfer Stations .............................................................................................. 79 6.3.4 The Description of the ancillary facilities at the Barcs Waste Treatment Centre 80 6.4 Waste Treatment Centre in Barcs............................................................................. 82 6.4.1 Detailed Description of the Function Based Facilities and Technologies....... 83 6.4.1.1 Mechanical Biological Waste Treatment (MBT) Hall................................. 83 6.4.1.2 Residual bio-waste composting.................................................................... 85 6.4.1.3 Stabilising Area............................................................................................ 85 6.4.2 Description of the ancillary facilities at the Barcs Waste Treatment Centre .. 86 6.5 Container parks........................................................................................................ 88 6.6 Transfer Stations...................................................................................................... 91 6.6.1 The Kaposszekcső Transfer Station.................................................................. 92 6.6.2 Szentlőrinc........................................................................................................ 93 6.6.3 Pécs .................................................................................................................. 94 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES ..................... 95 7.1 Soil ........................................................................................................................... 96 7.1.1 Impact of the Pécs-Kökény Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Soil ........... 96 7.1.2 Impact of the Barcs Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Soil....................... 98 7.1.3 Impact of the Marcali Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Soil ................... 99 7.1.4 Waste Transfer Stations ................................................................................. 100 7.1.5 Container Parks (CP)..................................................................................... 100 7.1.6 Waste Collection Islands................................................................................ 100 7.2 Surface and Underground Water............................................................................ 102 7.2.1 Impact of the Pécs-Kökény Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Surface and Underground Water ....................................................................................................... 102 7.2.1.1 Surface Waters ........................................................................................... 102 7.2.1.2 Underground Waters .................................................................................. 102 7.2.2 Impact of the Barcs Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Surface and Underground Waters...................................................................................................... 104 7.2.2.1 Surface Waters: .......................................................................................... 104 7.2.2.2 Underground Waters: ................................................................................. 105 7.2.3 Impact of the Marcali Regional Waste Treatment Centre on Surface and Underground Waters.....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • O Babarc Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Liptód Község
    SZOCIÁLIS ÉS GYERMEKVÉDELMI Brado- Lily Brado- Kesz- Brado- Lily FŐIGAZGATÓSÁG Maszk man gél life tyű lin 1L 1L BARANYA MEGYEI KIRENDELTSÉG 1L 500ml 300ml O Babarc Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Liptód Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Versend Község Önkormányzata Kerekítve 100 200 0 0 4 0 0 Összesen 80 160 0 0 4 0 0 SZOCIÁLIS ÉS GYERMEKVÉDELMI Brado- Lily Brado- Kesz- Brado- Lily FŐIGAZGATÓSÁG Maszk man gél life tyű lin 1L 1L BARANYA MEGYEI KIRENDELTSÉG 1L 500ml 300ml O Baksa Község Önkormányzata 400 400 0 0 20 0 0 Adorjás Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Baranyahídvég Községi Önkormányzat 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Bogádmindszent Község Önkormányzata 152 232 0 0 7 0 9 Hegyszentmárton Község Önkormányzata 152 232 0 0 7 0 9 Kisszentmárton Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Ózdfalu Község Önkormányzata 76 116 0 0 3 0 0 Sámod Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Tengeri Község Önkormányzata Téseny Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Kerekítve 1000 1400 0 0 47 0 18 Összesen 980 1380 0 0 47 0 18 SZOCIÁLIS ÉS GYERMEKVÉDELMI Brado- Lily Brado- Kesz- Brado- Lily FŐIGAZGATÓSÁG Maszk man gél life tyű lin 1L 1L BARANYA MEGYEI KIRENDELTSÉG 1L 500ml 300ml O Beremendi Gyermekjóléti és Szociális Társulás 1778 1941 14 38 77 10 36 Kistapolca Község Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0 Kerekítve 1800 2000 14 38 79 10 36 Összesen 1818 2021 14 38 79 10 36 SZOCIÁLIS ÉS GYERMEKVÉDELMI Brado- Lily Brado- Kesz- Brado- Lily FŐIGAZGATÓSÁG Maszk man gél life tyű lin 1L 1L BARANYA MEGYEI KIRENDELTSÉG 1L 500ml 300ml O Bicsérd Községi Önkormányzata 40 80 0 0 2 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Natura 2000” Területek Vonatkozásában Feljegyzett Ügyintéző: Simon-Kis Ildikó Természetvédelmi Jogi Jelleg Törléséről
    Ügyiratszám: 32601/3/2021 Tárgy: hirdetményi közlés a „Natura 2000” területek vonatkozásában feljegyzett Ügyintéző: Simon-Kis Ildikó természetvédelmi jogi jelleg törléséről H I R D E T M É N Y A Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal Földhivatali Főosztálya az ingatlan-nyilvántartásról szóló 1997. évi CXLI. törvény (a továbbiakban: Inytv.) 52/A. § (4) bekezdésében és az általános közigazgatási rendtartásról szóló 2016. évi CL. törvény (a továbbiakban: Ákr.) 88. § (1) bekezdés c) pontjában foglaltakra figyelemmel a közlést hirdetmény útján teljesíti az alábbi ügyiratszámmal rendelkező határozatok vonatkozásában. Az ügy száma: 380040/2021, 380041/2021, 380042/2021, 380043/2021, 380044/2021, 380045/2021, 380046/2021, 380047/2021, 380048/2021, 380049/2021, 380050/2021, 380051/2021, 380052/2021, 380053/2021, 380054/2021, 380055/2021, 380056/2021, 380057/2021 Az ügy tárgya: természetvédelmi tartalmú jogi jelleg törlése Kifüggesztés, közzététel napja: 2021. február 8. Eljáró hatóság megnevezése: Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal Földhivatali Főosztály Ügyfelek neve és utolsó ismert lakcíme (székhelye): • Ábrahám János 7555 Csokonyavisonta, Széchenyi István utca 148. • Akayné Főr Erzsébet 7500 Nagyatád, Széchenyi tér 16. • Balaton Aliz 7400 Kaposvár, Szent László utca 21. • Balázs Zsuzsanna Ilona 7570 Barcs, Gárdonyi Géza utca 55/3. • Balogh Margit 2112 Veresegyház, Öreghegysor 35/1. • Baloghné Somi Klára 7090 Tamási, Mátyás Király utca 3. • Barláné Németh Erzsébet 1224 Budapest, Angeli utca 102/A. • Bátorfi László 7570 Barcs, Jókai Mór utca 1. 2.ajtó • Baturin-Bátorfi Annamária 2481 Velence, Panoráma út 95. • Battyányi Géza 7555 Csokonyavisonta, Xantus János utca 116. • Bogdán Ferenc 7513 Rinyaszentkirály, Fő utca 50. • Bokor Gyuláné 7555 Csokonyavisonta, Xantus János utca 113. • BOLHÓ KÖZSÉG ÖNKORMÁNYZATA 7586 Bolhó, Kossuth Lajos utca 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Problémaösszesítő
    küldés időpontja település nemzetiség ülés időpontja közmeghallgatás 2013. április 12. Abaliget cigány 2013.03.14 KÖZMEGHALLGATÁS HIÁNYZIK 2013. április 12. Abaliget cigány 2013.02.12 2013. április 9. Abaliget cigány 2013.01.28 2013. április 9. Abaliget cigány 2013.01.14 2013. június 27. Abaliget cigány 2013.05.27 2013. július 9. Abaliget cigány 2013.06.17 2013. július 23. Abaliget cigány 2013.07.05 2013.augusztus 27. Abaliget cigány 2013.08.07 2013. szeptember 17. Abaliget cigány 2013.08.22 2013. november 19. Abaliget cigány 2013.10.28 2013. április 12. Adorjás cigány 2013.02.14 KÖZMEGHALLGATÁS HIÁNYZIK kétszer elküldve, másodszor tévesen Baranyahídvég CKÖ néven 2013. április 4. Adorjás cigány 2013.02.14 2013. április 12. Adorjás cigány 2013.01.10 kétszer elküldve, másodszor tévesen Baranyahídvég CKÖ néven 2013. április 3. Adorjás cigány 2013.01.10 2013. július 23. Adorjás cigány 2013.06.28 2013. szeptember 10. Adorjás cigány 2013.08.05 2013. április 9. Ág cigány 2013.03.05 KÖZMEGHALLGATÁS HIÁNYZIK 2013. június 12. Ág cigány 2013.04.30 2013. szeptember 17. Ág cigány 2013.04.30 2013. október 1. Ág cigány 2013.09.12 2013. április 9. Almamellék cigány 2013.02.15 4 ÜLÉS ÉS KÖZMEGHALLGATÁS HIÁNYZIK 2013. július 23. Almamellék cigány 2013.05.10 2013. november 5. Almamellék cigány 2013.09.20 2013. április 9. Almamellék német 2013.02.15 KÖZMEGHALLGATÁS HIÁNYZIK 2013.július 26. Almamellék német 2013.07.01 2013.július 26. Almamellék német 2013.05.14 2013.július 26. Almamellék német 2013.06.18 2013. szeptember 27 Almamellék német 2013.08.30 2013. november 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalmár Ádám – Results of the Joint Operations
    Results of the Joint Operations and trainings working group Danube Commission 15. February 2017. Budapest Ádám KALMÁR pol. Lt. Colonel Head of Division Baranya County Police Headquarters Objectives of the working group plan and organize 3 joint operations on the Danube during 2014 elaborate operation plans – (FOP with annexes and national SOP’s) work out and apply the uniform data exchange form for statistics synchronize the joint law enforcement operations in 10 countries run the Temporary Coordination Centre in Mohács, Hungary at the SEB contribute to the more exact analysis and evaluation of law enforcement risks in inland shipping with producing a joint Danube risk analysis material – the DARIF Risk Analyses Chart evaluate the operations completed and draw the conclusions, come to an arrangement with the partners about necessary changes summarize the results of joint operations, supply data to the law enforcement bodies of the participating countries make recommendations on the possibilities of similar joint operations and trainings in the future Page 33 Thematic meetings of the working group . Three thematic workshops were held during the project with 10-15 experts in the team of working group . Experts delegated from Each DARIF state, EU Agencies such as Europol, FRONTEX, Aquapol and the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) in Moldova and Ukraine . They had experiences in the areas of organising and synchronizing joint law enforcement operations and actions. Summary of the technical workshops: • Joint Operations (JO’s) should be multi-purpose operations • JO’s should focus on documents of seamen, illegal immigration, searching of ships but also to tackle against environmental pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • S. Transdanubia Action Plan, by Pécs-Baranya, HU
    Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism (CCT) in Europe Action Plan for South Transdanubia, Hungary ChamMap of partnerber of are Commercea / Partner info and Industry of Pécs- Baranya May 2021 Cultural and Creative Industries contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism in Europe _________________________ © Cult-CreaTE Project Partnership and Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya, Hungary This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-CreaTE Project Management and Coordination Unit and the respective partner: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-CreaTE Action Plan Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs- Baranya, Hungary The Cult-CreaTE Project Communications unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this action plan as a source, sent to e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya and in no way reflect the views of the Cult-CreaTE partnership, the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtectonic Measurements and Interpretation of the Mesozoic Formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary
    Central European Geology, Vol. 53/1, pp. 21–42 (2010) DOI: 10.1556/CEuGeol.53.2010.1.2 Microtectonic measurements and interpretation of the Mesozoic formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary Attila Petrik Department of Regional Geology Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest Within the framework of a National Research Fund project, different types of scientific investigations were carried out with the aim of a comprehensive paleogeographic reconstruction of the Tisza structural unit. As part of this project microtectonic measurements in the area of the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge were carried out. Several publications have already appeared concerning the structural development of the Mecsek–Villány area (Csontos and Bergerat 1988, 1993; Benkovics 1997; Csontos et al. 2002), but in these the Villány Hills and their surroundings played a secondary role compared to the Mecsek Mountains. The goal of the present study was to establish the limits of the structural phases and determine their relative and absolute ages. An important issue has been to clarify to what degree the suggested events of structural deformation could be integrated into regional geologic processes. The tectonic conditions of the area of interest were studied through description and analysis of structural elements of 12 investigated quarries within it. Calculated stress field data were also analyzed. Seven quarries in the Villány Hills, five in the Görcsöny–Máriakéménd area, the data of over 650 striae, 550 joints, various ductile deformation elements (folds, flexures) as well as stylolites, were recorded. Integrating these structural elements into the regional geologic processes was of significant importance. Introduction and geologic background The Tisza Unit (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Croatian Contribution to Plans for Revision of the Yugoslav- Hungarian Border in 1945-1946
    UDK: 327(497.1:439)’’1945/1946’’ 32(497.5)’’1945/1946’’ Izvorni znanstveni članak Received: September 7, 2012 Accepted: September 28, 2012 THE CROATIAN CONTRIBUTION TO PLANS FOR REVISION OF THE YUGOSLAV- HUNGARIAN BORDER IN 1945-1946 Petar BAGARIĆ∗ Th e Border Commission attached to the Presidency of the Government of the Federal State of Croatia prepared plans to revise the Yugoslav- Hungarian border during the period from the end of the Second World War to the Paris Peace Conference. Th is work introduces the Commission’s staff and presents its operating methods and the results of its work, as well as its rela- tions with federal institutions in Belgrade. Key words: Federal state of Croatia, Democratic Federal Yugoslavia, Hun- gary, Baja Triangle, Border Commission, alteration of borders. Introduction At the end of the Second World War in Europe, preparations commenced for a peace conference that would determine the peace conditions for the defeated states. Th e status of the defeated states was infl uenced by various factors: the time of their transfer to the Allied side, their armed contribution to the Allied victory or the number and strength of the victorious states which had territorial demands against their territories. Th e Democratic Federal, or Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia came out of the war as a victor and as the legal successor to the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Th is meant that it could place before Hungary the matter of Hungarian occupation of territories such as Prekomurje, Međimurje, Baranja and Bačka during the Second World War and seek material and territorial compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Bike Project, and Entitled for Funding in the IPA Hungary-Croatia Cross-Border Cooperation Program
    Hungary-Croatia IPA Cross-border Co-operation Programme 2007-2013 PROJECT PARTNER: HUNGARY-CROATIA IPA CROSS-BORDER PÉCS URBAN CO-OPERATION PROGRAM 2007-2013 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Cross -border Bike Project BICYCLE TOURISM HUHR/1101/1.2.2/1004 Development of Pécs- Osijek-Antunovac- Ivanovac biking route 1 Contents 1.Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. The description of the project ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Aims .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Expected results, the position of the project in the International Bicycle Network ................... 8 3. Bicycle tourism .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1. Bicycle and tourism worldwide .................................................................................................. 11 3.2. Bicycle tourism along the borders .............................................................................................. 15 3.3. Cycling and tourism within the framework of the IPA projects ................................................. 17 3.4. Bicycle and tourism in Baranya and Pécs .................................................................................. 19 3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable D1.12
    Deliverable D1.12 Final report on quality control and data homogenization measures applied per country, including QC protocols and measures to determine the achieved increase in data quality Contract number: OJEU 2010/S 110-166082 Deliverable: D1.12 Author: Tamás Szentimrey et al. Date: 5-06-2012 Version: final CARPATCLIM Date Version Page Report 02/10/2012 final 2 List of authors per country Hungarian Meteorological Service: Tamás Szentimrey, Mónika Lakatos, Zita Bihari, Tamás Kovács Szent Istvan University (Hungary): Sándor Szalai Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics (Austria): Ingeborg Auer, Johann Hiebl Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia: Janja Milković Czech Hydrometeorological Institute: Petr Štěpánek, Pavel Zahradníček, Radim Tolasz Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (Poland): Piotr Kilar, Robert Pyrc, Danuta Limanowka Ministry for Environment National Research and Development Institute for Environmental Protection (Romania): Sorin Cheval, Monica Matei Slovak Hydrometeorological Service: Peter Kajaba, Gabriela Ivanakova, Oliver Bochnicek, Pavol Nejedlik, Pavel Štastný Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia: Dragan Mihic, Predrag Petrovic, Tatjana Savic Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute: Oleg Skrynyk, Yurii Nabyvanets, Natalia Gnatiuk CARPATCLIM Date Version Page Report 02/10/2012 final 3 INTRODUCTION The homogenization, the data quality control and the data completion were implemented by common software on national level. According to the service contract and the accepted deliverables D1.7, D1.8, D1.11 the common method was MASH (Multiple Analysis of Series for Homogenization; Szentimrey, 1999, 2008, 2011). Between the neighbouring countries there was an exchange of the near border station data series in order to cross-border harmonization. 1. THE SOFTWARE MASHV3.03 The MASH software, which was developed for homogenization of monthly and daily data series, includes also quality control and missing data completion units for the daily as well as the monthly data.
    [Show full text]
  • SO/TO/01569-59/2020. Tárgy: HHE-Fánimajor Gyűjtőállomás És a Ügyintéző: Gombos Eszter Berzence-Csurgó Fogadóállomás Közötti Dr
    Ügyiratszám: SO/TO/01569-59/2020. Tárgy: HHE-Fánimajor gyűjtőállomás és a Ügyintéző: Gombos Eszter Berzence-Csurgó fogadóállomás közötti dr. Márki Mirella mezőbeni kőolajvezeték létesítése a MOL Telefonszám: 82/795-975 Nyrt. Csurgó szivattyúállomási kapcsolat biztosításának előzetes vizsgálati eljárása KÜJ: 100 447 444 KTJ: 102 860 112 HATÁROZAT A MAGYAR HORIZONT ENERGIA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (1026 Budapest, Pasaréti út 46., a továbbiakban: Környezethasználó) meghatalmazása alapján az Eco-Green Környezetvédelmi és Innovációs Kft. (4400 Nyíregyháza, Mártírok tere 9., a továbbiakban: Tervező) által benyújtott kérelem és előzetes vizsgálati dokumentáció alapján lefolytatott előzetes vizsgálat lezárásaként megállapítom, hogy a HHE-Fánimajor gyűjtőállomás és a Berzence-Csurgó fogadóállomás közötti mezőbeni kőolajvezeték létesítésével a MOL Nyrt. Csurgó szivattyúállomási kapcsolat biztosításával kapcsolatban környezetvédelmi engedélyezést kizáró ok nem merült fel, a tervezett tevékenységnek jelentős környezeti hatása nincs, ezért környezeti hatásvizsgálati eljárás lefolytatása nem szükséges. A tevékenység megkezdéséhez természetvédelmi engedély, végleges erdő igénybevételt engedélyező határozat, termőföld más célú hasznosításra vonatkozó engedély és az illetékes bányafelügyelet engedélyének megszerzése szükséges. I. A közreműködő szakhatóság állásfoglalása A Baranya Megyei Katasztrófavédelmi Igazgatóság a 35200/3194-1/2020. ált. számú vízügyi és vízvédelmi szakhatósági állásfoglalását az alábbiak szerint adta meg: „Az előzetes vizsgálati
    [Show full text]
  • A PÉCS Oltalom Alatt Álló Eredetmegjelölés Termékleírása
    A PÉCS oltalom alatt álló eredetmegjelölés termékleírása 1. változat, amely a 2016. július 31-ét megelőzően szüretelt szőlőből készült borászati termékekre alkalmazandó Tartalomjegyzék I. NÉV ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. A BOROK LEÍRÁSA .............................................................................................................................. 3 III. KÜLÖNÖS BORÁSZATI ELJÁRÁSOK ................................................................................................ 4 IV. KÖRÜLHATÁROLT TERÜLET ............................................................................................................. 5 V. MAXIMÁLIS HOZAM .......................................................................................................................... 6 VI. ENGEDÉLYEZETT SZŐLŐFAJTÁK ...................................................................................................... 7 VII. KAPCSOLAT A FÖLDRAJZI TERÜLETTEL ........................................................................................ 8 VIII. TOVÁBBI FELTÉTELEK .................................................................................................................... 12 IX. ELLENŐRZÉS ..................................................................................................................................... 15 X. A HEGYKÖZSÉGI FELADATOK ELLÁTÁSÁNAK RENDJE ..............................................................
    [Show full text]