Study Guide - Linguistics 4 Unit 2: The Origins and Evolution of Language

I. History of the study: 1) 1866 - topic banned by the Linguistics Society of Paris 2) late 19th century – Jespersen’s summary of 5 theories (CEL pg. 291) 3) 1981 "Roots of Language" by Bickerton 4) 1990s - became hot topic in many different fields, including linguistics, evolutionary biology, paleontology, cognitive neuroscience, etc.

II. Dimensions of the Debate 1) Linguistics and Cognitive Science a) Nativism VS Empiricism b) Domain specificity VS General cognition 2) Evolutionary Biology a) Saltation VS Gradualism b) Possibility of Exaptation 3) Anthropology a) Out of Africa VS Multiregionalism 4) Evolution of Language - what's the driving force? a) Mental Representation VS Communication 5) Discontinuity Paradox/Problem a) Qualitative VS Quantitative

III. Hominid Evolution (handout) --> changes in anatomy, culture (tool use), etc.. 1) Ardipithecines: a) ramidus kadabba (oldest fossil found) - dated as 5.2 -5.8 MYA - size of chimp ~ 4ft tall - bipedal much of the time; also arboreal - not great hunters; mostly fibre diet b) Ardipithecus ramidus ramidus - dated as 4.4 MYA - probably bipedal 2) a) anamensis - dated as 4.07 ~ 4.17 MYA - sexually dimorphic (male being significantly larger) - clearly bipedal, but also arboreal b) Australopithecus afarensis - dated as 3-4 MYA - most famous specimen “” à ~3.2 MYA; 3’6 tall - sexually dimorphic - clearly bipedal with ape-like torso; curve arms and legs (arboreal) c) Australopithecus africanus - dated as 2.5 MYA - only found in South Africa - diet included meat (indicated from the different chemical makeup of - bones)probably the only ones that looked like modern d) Australopithecus robustus - dated as 1.5 – 2 MYA - known as the “Robust Australopithecines” - our “weird cousins” with strange heads e) Australopithecus boisei - dated as 1.7 – 1.8 MYA - with huge jaws (i.e. massive chewing) & distorted facial features - teeth rearrangement might have affected ficial features, which might have effected skulls’ shapes (important to vocal tract theory) f) Australopithecus garhi - dated as 2.9 MYA - descended from A. afarensis - less than 5 ft tall with ape-like braincase - long forearms and long legs (may still be climbing trees) - found near cut-in marked bones à possible 1st evidence of tool use (no tools found though) 3) a) - dated as 2.5 MYA - under 5 ft tall with larger brains than australopithecines - with primitive stone tools - named “habilis” à “handy man” b) - dated as 2 MYA (evolved from H. habilis) - including “” & “” (found in Indonesia and China) - 1st species to appear out of Africa (i.e. indication of migration) - ~ 5’6 tall with like body - no sign of arboreal abilities; indication of meat diet - marked increase of brain size (1/2 to 1/3 smaller than modern humans) - changes in thoracic vertebrae in late H. erectus à w/ breathing control c) (Europe) - discovered in Valley of Neander (Germany) - 2 studies showed no DNA overlap with modern humans - fossil of a 4 yr old (reading) in Portugal with hybrid characteristics of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens à evidence of intermarriage - large brains, with diff. hand, nasal, and ear anatomy - with human like hyoid bone and hypoglossal canal size - many stone tools; primarily carnivorous and cannibalistic - had clothings; ritual burials; took care of elderly - unclear about cognitive ability (lived in food-full environment)

IV. Genetically Based Theories 1) Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) a) nativism b) domain specificity c) human language vs. communication - qualitative differences 2) Chomskian linguists - nativism, domain specificity, saltation, out of Africa a) extreme view - denies empiricism b) moderate view (Pinker) - gradualism is plausible 3) Pinker's criteria for a trait to be selected for: (driven by communicative ability) a) heritable and show genetic variation b) intermediate stages of development c) each step enhances reproductive abilities of speakers d) sufficient evolutionary time 4) Evidence a) brain damage studies b) KE family

V. The Vocal Tract Theory 1) Differences between human's, hominids', & ' vocal tract 2) Philip Lieberman's theory a) communicative ability as driving force of evolution b) nativist to phonetic ability (focus); empirialist to grammar c) gradualism for human vocal tract 3) Evidence a) Anatomical abilities (not necessarily neural) i) All mammalian vocal tracts can produce alveolars: [t], [d], [s], [n] ii) vocal tracts can produce bilabials: [p], [b], [m] iii) human vocal tracts can produce quantal sounds: [a] [i] [u] [k] [g] [ ] 4) Problems a) reproductive advantages? b) 2 languages without quantal sounds c) softer diet drives change of skull & teeth VI. The Bioprogram Theory 1) Derek Bickerton a) nativism: - innately programmed; humans born with language template - children with corrupted input can fill in the gaps to create language b) protolanguage VS language - Protolanguage: no grammar but with symbolic references - Language: with both grammar and symbolic references 2) Evidence a) pidgins & creoles (handout with examples from Hawaiian creoles) b) Nicaraguan Sign language (from reading and in class videos)

VII. Gesture-based Theories (readings & slide show) 1) Story: language evolved from manual gestures, then to vocalizations 2) Satisfies Pinker’s criteria 3) à iconic & indexical only, cuz symbolic reference was tough writing systems à all found as iconic first, then became more arbiturary 4) Directionality à started as iconic and indexical, then became grammaticized (w/ intermediate stages): a) hearing adults suppressing speech (i.e. in favor of gestures) b) deaf children acquiring signs directing towards objects c) captive apes w/ manual gestures (the zoo gorillas: son having affair with girl à with the suppressed calls, while using gestures to direct her to different positions) d) food, sex, social relations all serve as driving force for having gestures in communication 5) Examples from readings: a) emotion expressed thru gestures (similarties between infants & chimps) b) deaf people throughout the world have invented sign languages (innate) c) ancestors w/ advantages of communicating silently (during hunting) d) primates w/ better cortical control over hand movements than vocalization e) as result of using hands for communication (adaptation) f) Iverson's observation of blind people’s use of gestures (nativism) 3) Gestures to vocalization: a) vocalization w/ advantages of talking at dark, freeing hands (gradual)