Ÿþm Icrosoft W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inkanyiso OFC 8.1 FM.Fm
21 The suppression of political opposition and the extent of violating civil liberties in the erstwhile Ciskei and Transkei bantustans, 1960-1989 Maxwell Z. Shamase 1 Department of History, University of Zululand [email protected] This paper aims at interrogating the nature of political suppression and the extent to which civil liberties were violated in the erstwhile Ciskei and Transkei. Whatever the South African government's reasons, publicly stated or hidden, for encouraging bantustan independence, by the time of Ciskei's independence ceremonies in December 1981 it was clear that the bantustans were also to be used as a more brutal instrument for suppressing opposition. Both Transkei and Ciskei used additional emergency-style laws to silence opposition in the run-up to both self- government and later independence. By the mid-1980s a clear pattern of brutal suppression of opposition had emerged in both bantustans, with South Africa frequently washing its hands of the situation on the grounds that these were 'independent' countries. Both bantustans borrowed repressive South African legislation initially and, in addition, backed this up with emergency-style regulations passed with South African assistance before independence (Proclamation 400 and 413 in Transkei which operated from 1960 until 1977, and Proclamation R252 in Ciskei which operated from 1977 until 1982). The emergency Proclamations 400, 413 and R252 appear to have been retained in the Transkei case and introduced in the Ciskei in order to suppress legal opposition at the time of attainment of self-government status. Police in the bantustans (initially SAP and later the Transkei and Ciskei Police) targeted political opponents rather than criminals, as the SAP did in South Africa. -
The Rise and Fall of the Ciskei Homeland and Bantustan Leadership, 1972–1994
Article The Rise and Fall of the Ciskei Homeland and Bantustan Leadership, 1972–1994 Fezile Cindi Independent Researcher, South Africa [email protected] Abstract In this article, I grapple with notions of celebration, commemoration, and leadership as narratives of memory, in the Ciskei Bantustan in particular. The aim of the article is to get readers to remember and reflect on our past, in order to understand the present. The article also focuses on the history of the Ciskei homeland, its leadership values, and role of traditional leaders, rural development, legislative imperatives, and the impact of the policy of separate development, as well as the coups, suppression, torture and killings that happened between 1972 and 1994. Keywords: Bantustan; Ciskei; homeland; leadership Introduction I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep, I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion. (Alexander the Great) In this article, I grapple with notions of celebration, commemoration, and leadership as narratives of memory, in the Ciskei Bantustan in particular. The aim of the article is to get readers to remember and reflect on our past in order to understand the present. The article also focuses on the history of the Ciskei homeland and its leadership values, and it touches on the role of traditional leaders, rural development, legislative imperatives, the policy of separate development, as well as the coups, torture, oppression, and killings that happened between 1972 and 1994. The Ciskei Bantustan in the Eastern Cape was formed to serve as an enclave for Xhosa- speaking people in South Africa, as part of the policy of racial segregation, following the constitution of the Republic of South Africa in May 1961. -
Committed to Unity
Committed to Unity: South Africa’s Adherence to Its 1994 Political Settlement Paul Graham IPS Paper 6 Abstract This paper reviews the commitment of the remaining power contenders and other political actors to the settlement which was reached between 1993 and 1996. Based on interviews with three key actors now in opposing political parties represented in the National Assembly, the paper makes the case for a continued commitment to, and consensus on, the ideals and principles of the 1996 Constitution. It provides evidence of schisms in the dominant power contender (the African National Congress) which have not led to a return in political violence post-settlement. The paper makes the point that, while some of this was the result of President Nelson Mandela’s presence, more must be ascribed to the constitutional arrangements and commitments of the primary political actors and the citizens of South Africa. © Berghof Foundation Operations GmbH – CINEP/PPP 2014. All rights reserved. About the Publication This paper is one of four case study reports on South Africa produced in the course of the collaborative research project ‘Avoiding Conflict Relapse through Inclusive Political Settlements and State-building after Intra-State War’, running from February 2013 to February 2015. This project aims to examine the conditions for inclusive political settlements following protracted armed conflicts, with a specific focus on former armed power contenders turned state actors. It also aims to inform national and international practitioners and policy-makers on effective practices for enhancing participation, representation, and responsiveness in post-war state-building and governance. It is carried out in cooperation with the partner institutions CINEP/PPP (Colombia, Project Coordinators), Berghof Foundation (Germany, Project Research Coordinators), FLACSO (El Salvador), In Transformation Initiative (South Africa), Sudd Institute (South Sudan), Aceh Policy Institute (Aceh/Indonesia), and Friends for Peace (Nepal). -
South Africa: Historical Background Greg Moran
Third World Legal Studies Volume 14 The Governance of Internal Security Forces Article 8 in Sub-Saharan Africa 1-8-1997 Human Rights and the Structure of Internal Security Forces – South Africa: Historical Background Greg Moran Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls Recommended Citation Moran, Greg (1997) "Human Rights and the Structure of Internal Security Forces – South Africa: Historical Background," Third World Legal Studies: Vol. 14, Article 8. Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol14/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Third World Legal Studies by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNAL SECURITY FORCES SOUTH AFRICA: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND By Greg Moran* The apartheid policies that characterised most of the period of colonial rule, both formally (after 1948) and informally before, left an indelible mark on the consciousness of South Africans, (and on the map of the country prior to 1994). The policy of creating separate homelands for each of the black ethnic groupings and pushing these to independence to ensure the survival of white South Africa, lead to the creation of numerous police and armed forces. The records of all of these are severely blemished and their histories steeped in blood. At present, moves are afoot to incorporate all of these security forces into unified bodies: the South African National Defense Force (SANDF) and the South African Police Services (SAPS). -
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
VOLUME THREE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to Regional Profiles ........ 1 Appendix: National Chronology......................... 12 Chapter 2 REGIONAL PROFILE: Eastern Cape ..................................................... 34 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Eastern Cape........................................................... 150 Chapter 3 REGIONAL PROFILE: Natal and KwaZulu ........................................ 155 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in Natal, KwaZulu and the Orange Free State... 324 Chapter 4 REGIONAL PROFILE: Orange Free State.......................................... 329 Chapter 5 REGIONAL PROFILE: Western Cape.................................................... 390 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Western Cape ......................................................... 523 Chapter 6 REGIONAL PROFILE: Transvaal .............................................................. 528 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Transvaal ...................................................... -
Work in Progress, No. 79
Work in progress, No. 79 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org/. Page 1 of 54 Alternative title Work In Progress Author/Creator University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg) Contributor Pillay, Devan Publisher University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg) Date 1991-12 Resource type Journals (Periodicals) Language Afrikaans, English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa Coverage (temporal) 1991 Source Digital Imaging South Africa (DISA) Rights By kind permission of Hein Marais, Julian May, and the Southern Africa Report. Format extent 52 page(s) (length/size) -
ACTION ALERT November 1991
Human Rights Campaign for South Africa ACTION ALERT November 1991 BANTUSTAN REPRESSION UNTOUCHED BY REFORMS The South African government created tustan of Bophuthatswana. As ANC 2. Please write orfax President Bush and the ten bantustans or so-called lawyer Mathew Phosa said: "If President your representatives in Congress. Say "homelands" as labor reserves where Bush is going to say there are no more that because the bantustan system denies Africans (86% of South Africa's popula political prisoners in South Africa, it citizenship and other basic human rights tion) would be confined to 13% of the means the United States recognizes to Africans, you urge them to reimpose least valuable land. Four of the bantu Bophuthatswana as an independent state." sanctions on South Africa and to issue stans have received so-called "inde strong statements of protest to the de The continued existence of the bantustans pendence," while the government con Klerk government. is highly dangerous. For instance, Gatsha siders the others to be "self-governing." No country in the world except South Buthelezi, the ruler of the kwaZulu ban President George Bush tustan, has used his position as a power Africa has officially recognized the ban The White House tustans as independent states. base to bolster his Inkatha Freedom Washington, DC 20500-0001 Party. Attacks by Inkatha against the Tel. (202) 456-1111 The bantustans, by dividing Africans ANC and other opponents have killed Fax (202) 456-2461 along ethnic lines, made it harder for ac thousands since the mid-1980s. tivists to oppose apartheid, and enabled Senator _ the government to exploit the labor of Some of the most serious human rights US Senate Africans without paying for health care, violations have occurred in the Ciskei Washington, DC 20510 education, and other social services. -
Africa Watch Overview
AFRICA WATCH OVERVIEW The year 1990 was as dramatic as the previous one. The work done by Africa Watch in its first year created a considerable demand, both inside and outside Africa, for us to expand our activities to accommodate these developments. The year was marked by a popular movement for democracy and human rights which spread nearly as rapidly as the movement the previous year in Eastern Europe. As in Eastern Europe, the electronic media played an important part in spreading news and consciousness of human rights issues -- particularly the international radio stations such as the British Broadcasting Corporation, Radio France International and Voice of America. (Africa Watch gave regular interviews to these and other radio stations throughout the year.) The democracy movement spread most rapidly in Francophone West Africa. Benin moved toward a multiparty system with a new reform-minded Prime Minister after years of "Marxism-Leninism." The right-wing Ivory Coast also embraced multipartyism after widespread popular protests, as did Gabon. Even an entrenched one-party dictator such as Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire felt the need to pay lip service to the multiparty creed. These transitions were fraught with problems. Harassment of opposition parties continued and there were allegations of fraud in the elections in both Gabon and the Ivory Coast in late 1990. Zambia, like the Ivory Coast, was forced to accede to the demand for multiparty politics after widespread popular demonstrations. The ruling party in Zimbabwe decisively voted against moving to a one-party state after public debate had revealed the extent of popular opposition to such a change. -
Security Council Distr
UNITED NATIONS S Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1994/717 16 June 1994 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE QUESTION OF SOUTH AFRICA I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 14 April 1994, I submitted a report to the Security Council on the situation in South Africa and the work of the United Nations Observer Mission (UNOMSA) in that country (S/1994/435). The present report, also submitted pursuant to Security Council resolutions 772 (1992) and 894 (1994) of 17 August 1992 and 14 January 1994, respectively, will be, happily, my last on the question of South Africa, as regards the work of UNOMSA, and the transitional process in that country. II. THE TRANSITIONAL PROCESS IN SOUTH AFRICA 2. For obvious reasons, my report will focus, this time, on the electoral mandate of UNOMSA and on the breathtaking developments that took place in South Africa during the month of April 1994, culminating in the holding of elections from 26 to 29 April 1994, the proclamation of the official results on 5 May 1994 and the memorable inauguration of the new President of the Republic of South Africa, Mr. Nelson Rolihlala Mandela, on 10 May 1994. 3. In my previous report I spoke of the mixed feelings of hope and fear shared by South Africans of all backgrounds and foreign observers alike as the date of the election neared: hopes arising from the determination of the main political players to see the process through to its logical conclusion, a substantially free and fair election, and fears because violence continued at an ever- increasing level and some significant political forces still refused to join the peace and reconciliation process and participate in the election. -
No. 559, September 183, 1992
WfJRIlERS 'AllfilAR/) No. 559 ~X.523 18 September 1992 South Africa: The Fraud of Neo-Ap-artheid De Klerk's Banluslan· Massacre For the second time in three months, a bloody massacre has brutally exposed the myth that the racist apartheid state No "Power-Sharing" Illusions-For Workers Revolution! is being transformed into a "democratic" South Africa. On September 7, the army of the Ciskei bantustan unleashed a pro longed machine-gun fusillade into a protest march of 50,000 African National Congress supporters, killing at least 28, and wounding scores of others. Ciskei's military regime headed by the despot Brigadier Oupa Gqozo is a creature of Pretoria, and blame for this heinous crime lies squarely at the feet of Presi dent EW. De Klerk. Like the Inkatha strongman Buthelezi, Gqozo is one of apartheid's dogs of war. South African officials make up most of his cabinet and head the intelligence service. The commander of the "Ciskei Defence Force" which mowed down the ANC protesters is on loan from the South African army. Troops of the "South Afri can Defence Force" lined the route of march up to the "border" of the "inde pendent homeland," where they watched the Ciskei forces mow down the fleeing demonstrators. Many of those killed were still on the South African side of what one writer called the "imaginary line, delineating the imaginary border to an imaginary country." The parched Ciskei is a dumping ground for apartheid: more than a quarter arinovichl P of the people were forcibly relocated ANC marchers carry wounded comrade after apartheid "homelands" troops opened fire on unarmed demonstrators. -
ACTION ALERT September 1992
South Africa Human Rights Campaign ACTION ALERT September 1992 PROTEST THE CISKEI MASSACRE On September 7, without any warning, Independent eyewitness accounts 1. Establish a full, public judicial soldiers of the Ciskei Defence Force confrrm that the attack was unprovoked. inquiry into the massacre. (CDF) fired on a large crowd of demon The demonstrators were unarmed and strators, killing 24 and injuring 195. acting peacefully. The fact that the 2. Bring those responsible for the killing The demonstrators were taking part in Ciskei troops had been issued live to justice. a march, sponsored by the African ammunition supports the conclusion 3. Compensate the families of the National Congress, the Congress.of that the demonstrators were deliberately victims. South African Trade Unions, and the trapped and massacred. South African Communist Party, to 4. Ban the use of live ammunition protest the continued existence of the Blaming the victim against nonviolent demonstrators. "homelands" and the oppressive regime The news media and Western govern 5. Protect residents of the Ciskei who of Brigadier Oupa Gqozo, the military ments have increasingly blamed the participated in the march from the ruler of the Ciskei bantustan. ANC for the massacre, maintaining that reprisals now being taken by the Ciskei ANC leaders should have known that The Ciskei, possibly the most repressive Defence Force. of the "homelands" created under apart Oupa Gqozo would turn his army on the heid, has effectively banned the ANC demonstrators, and therefore should 6. Require the "homelands" to alIow from organizing meetings, and has have cancelIed the march. peaceful, democratic expression of repressed political opposition. -
South Africa
132 Hide and Seek: Taking Account of Small Arms in Southern Africa C O Y U 6 D N U T RY S T SOUTH AFRICA Chandré Gould, Centre for Conflict Resolution Guy Lamb, Centre for Conflict Resolution Gregory Mthembu-Salter, Independent Researcher Steven Nakana, Centre for Conflict Resolution Dennis Rubel, Independent Researcher Introduction Researchers in many southern African countries involved in this study found it difficult, and in most cases impossible, to obtain accurate statistical data about the number of legal small arms in their countries, particularly those belonging to the state. South Africa was an exception as extensive official data is available. South Africa has the highest number of legally owned civilian firearms in the region. In mid-1996 nearly 2 million South African citizens legally owned 3 503 573 firearms. In 2004 there were 3 737 676 firearms licenced to individuals and institutions in the country. With so many civilian owners and a strong pro-gun lobby, it is to the credit of both the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the parliamentary sub- committee on Safety and Security that South Africa began implementing all provisions of its new firearms control legislation during 2004. This legislation introduced more stringent controls over civilian small arms than the Arms and Ammunition Act (No. 75 of 1969 and its subsequent amendments), which it replaced. The new law, known as the Firearms 134 Hide and Seek: Taking Account of Small Arms in Southern Africa Country Study: South Africa 135 Control Act (No. 60 of 2000) was drafted with South Africa’s international For an assessment of the size of the South African National Defence Force and regional commitments to small arms control in mind.