DOCSLIB.ORG

Православие В Балтии, № 7 (16) Научно-Аналитический Журнал Rīga, LU Filozofijas Un Socioloģijas Institūts, 2018, 212 Lpp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Православие В Балтии, № 7 (16) Научно-Аналитический Журнал Rīga, LU Filozofijas Un Socioloģijas Institūts, 2018, 212 Lpp Научно-аналитический журнал Православие в Балтии № 7 (16) ISSN 2255–9035 Rīga 2018 УДК 281.9 (4)(051) П 685 Pravoslavije v Baltiji (Pareizticība Baltijā), Nr. 7 (16) Zinātniski analītisks žurnāls Rīga: LU Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts, 2018, 212 lpp. Православие в Балтии, № 7 (16) Научно-аналитический журнал Rīga, LU Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts, 2018, 212 lpp. Главный редактор: Гаврилин Александр Валентинович Редакционный совет: Назарова Евгения, канд. ист. наук (Россия) Шор Татьяна, Dr. phil. (Эстония) Пермяков Виталий, Dr. theol. (США) Миронович Антони, Dr. hab. hist. (Польша) Епископ Каракасский и Южно-Американский Иоанн (Берзиньш) (Аргентина) Круминя-Конькова Солвейга, Dr. phil. (Латвия) Протоиерей Александр Берташ, канд. богословия и искусствоведения (Германия, Россия) Богоявленская Светлана, Dr. hist. (Германия) Пазухина Надежда, Dr. art. (Латвия) Секретарь редакционного совета: Андрей Гусаченко(Латвия) Редактор-корректор: Житарева Марина Компьютерная верстка: Кулис Марис Publicēts saskaņā ar LU Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūta Zinātniskas Padomes 2017. gada 2. oktobra lēmumu. Izdevums sagatavots par Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskās attīstības projekta AAP 2018/39 (Y5-AZ200-ZF-N-905) līdzekļiem. Все присланные материалы проходят процедуру анонимного рецензирования и утверждения редакционным советом. Редакция не отвечает за точку зрения авторов статей, за опубликованные авторами материалы. Право на публикацию представленных авторами материалов принадлежит редакции. Представленные в редакцию материалы авторам не возвращаются. Переиздание материалов журнала возможно лишь с разрешения редакции. На обложке: Церковь во имя Рождества Богородицы в Рагуве (Литва). 1873–1875 гг. Фотография Витаса Лаукайтиса. 2017 г. Pravoslavie v Baltii (The Orthodoxy in the Baltics), Nr 7 (16) Scientific-analytical journal Riga, University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, 2018, 212 p. General Editor: Alexander Gavrilin, Dr. hist., Associate Professor (Latvia) Editorial Board: Evgeniya Nazarova, Dr. hist. (Russia) Tatiana Shor, Dr. phil. (Estonia) Permyakov Vitaly, Dr. theol. (U. S.A.) Antoni Mironowicz, Dr. hab. hist. (Poland) John (Berzins) Bishop of Caracass and South America (Argentina) Solveiga Krumina-Konkova, Dr. phil. (Latvia) Alexander Bertash, priest, Dr. art. (Germany, Russia) Svetlana Bogoyavlenskaya, Dr. hist. (Germany) Pazuhina Nadezhda, Dr. art. (Latvia) Editorial Board Secretary: Andrejs Gusachenko (Latvia) Literary editor: Marina Zhitareva Layout: Maris Kulis Pravoslavie v Baltii is a double-blind peer reviewed periodical with international editorial board. The aim of the magazine is to reflect the history of the church in the Baltic region in an objective manner. The publication does not have denominational restrictions, and it is not controlled by spiritual or secular censorship. It is published at least once a year in Russian and English. Published materials cannot be reproduced without permission from the editor or editorial board. © Latvijas Universitātes Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts, 2018 © Aleksandrs Gavriļins, 2018 © Rakstu autori ISSN 2255–9035 Содержание / Contents Предисловие / Introduction ................................................. 7 Научные статьи / Scientific articles Антони Миронович (Польша) Antoni Mironowicz (Poland) Георгий Конисский – епископ белорусский ................................... 11 Georgy Konissky the bishop of Belarus Paul W. Werth (USA) Empire, Religious Freedom, and the Legal Regulation of “Mixed” Marriages in Russia ..................................... 29 Михаил Шкаровский (Россия) Mikhail Shkarovsky (Russia) Эстонские православные приходы в Санкт-Петербургской епархии ............. 57 Estonian orthodox parishes in the eparchy of Saint Petersburg Андрей Гусаченко (Латвия) Andrejs Gusachenko (Latvia) История храма во имя иконы Божией Матери «Всех скорбящих Радосте» в Риге .......................................... 73 The history of the church in the name of the icon Mother of God “Joy of all who sorrow” in Riga Александр Гаврилин (Латвия) Alexander Gavrilin (Latvia) О каноническом статусе Православной Церкви в Эстонии и Латвии в начале 1920-х годов .................................... 101 Canonical status of the Latvian and Estonian Orthodox Churches in the beginning of the 1920’s Sebastian Rimestad (Germany) The Orthodox Church in Estonia and Latvia during Quasi-Totalitarianism .......... 113 Сергей Мянник (Эстония) Sergey Mannik (Estonia) Архиепископ Евсевий ..................................................... 131 Archibishop Evsevy Мемуары / Memoirs Анна Гарклава. Жизнь православного латышского прихода в г. Лимбажи в 1944–1964 гг. ...................................... 147 Anna Garklava. The life of the Latvian orthodox parish in Limbaži in 1944–1964 Публикация документов / Document publications Летопись Венденской градской Спасо-Преображенской церкви Лифляндской губернии за 1917–1941 гг. ...............................175 The chronicles of the orthodox church of Enlightment in Venden (Cēsis) in 1917–1941 Отчёт по Литовско-Виленской епархии за 1953 год ............................195 Report about the situation in the Orthodox Diocese of Lithuania in 1953 Анонс .................................................................... 211 Предисловие Как известно, самой крупной (много- от таких родителей, обязательно должны численной) Православной Церковью мира были креститься в православие, однако на является Русская Православная Церковь. протяжении XIX века и особенно в нача- Именно поэтому большинство трудов по ле ХХ века ситуация изменилась. Закон об истории Церкви, в том числе и наш жур- обязательном крещении детей, рождённых нал, издаются на русском языке. Вместе с в смешанных браках, в православие не от- тем языком межнаучного общения являет- меняют, однако уже не требуют его неу- ся английский язык. Именно поэтому мы коснительного соблюдения. решили в данном номере журнала опубли- Интереснейший материал удалось найти ковать два материала на английском языке. и обработать ведущему российскому специ- Надеемся, что это расширит читательскую алисту по истории Русской Православной аудиторию. Церкви в ХХ веке, профессору Михаилу В первом разделе седьмого номера жур- Витальевичу Шкаровскому. Его статья рас- нала «Православие в Балтии» опубли- сказывает о деятельности в конце XIX на- кованы восемь научных статей. В статье чале XX века в Санкт-Петербургской епар- одного из ведущих польских историков, хии эстонских православных приходов. профессора Антони Мироновича, анали- Единственным православным храмом в зируется отношение польского правитель- Риге, который был закрыт и стёрт с лица ства и правительства Российской империи земли в годы советского режима, была к православному населению на территории церковь во имя иконы Божией Матери, Речи Посполитой накануне первого раз- «Всех скорбящих Радосте». Интересен дела Польши, роль епископа Георгия Ко- и тот факт, что храм был снесён уже после нисского в защите прав православных на окончания «хрущёвских гонений». Исто- польских землях. Автор убедительно дока- рии этого храма и анализу мотивов его зывает, что российское правительство во- закрытия посвящена статья латвийского все не заботили права своих единоверцев, историка Андрея Гусаченко. а лишь сугубо государственные, политиче- Тематически связаны друг с другом ские интересы. статья латвийского историка Александра В статье профессора Университета в Гаврилина и статья германского исследо- Лас-Вегасе Пола Верта разбирается крайне вателя Себастиана Риместада. В первой актуальная для прибалтийских губерний статье анализируются попытки ЭАПЦ и в XIX веке проблема смешанных браков, ЛПЦ в начале 1920-х годов найти новый т.е. браков православных с иноверцами. канонический статус в условиях образова- По российским законам дети, рождённые ния независимых Эстонской и Латвийской Предисловие 7 республик. Автор доказывает, что вплоть до иерею Сергию Гарклавсу, то публикуемые 1923 года события развивались по общему в данном номере журнала воспоминания сценарию. В 1923 году ЭАПЦ перешла в касаются только послевоенного периода юрисдикцию Константинопольского Па- существования Преображенской церкви. триархата, ЛПЦ, благодаря твердой по- Кроме того, изменилась форма воспомина- зиции своего предстоятеля, архиепископа ний: если первый фрагмент Гарклава писа- Иоанна (Поммера), осталась в юрисдикции ла собственноручно, поэтому отчасти сум- Московского Патриархата в форме незави- бурно, то второй фрагмент – это результат симой автономной Церкви. бесед Андрея Гусаченко с А. П. Гарклавой, С. Риместад исследует существование в ходе которых автор отвечала на конкрет- ЭАПЦ и ЛПЦ в условиях авторитарно- ные вопросы. го режима в 1930-х годах, когда Церкви В третьем разделе журнала публикует- утрачивают свою самостоятельность и ся фрагмент летописи цесисской Спасо- церковные управления занимаются про- Преображенской церкви за 1917–1941 гг. пагандой и реализацией государственной В этом фрагменте наибольший интерес идеологии. представляют страницы, написанные на- Эстонский исследователь Сергей Мян- стоятелем церкви в 1930-х годах о. Иоаном ник продолжает серию статей, посвящён- (Янисом) Бриедисом, который попытался ных архиереям, служившим на эстонской на практике реорганизовать приходскую земле после Первой мировой войны. В жизнь в соответствии с распоряжениями этом журнале публикуется статья, посвя- церковного руководства и правительства щённая деятельности архиепископа Нарв- авторитарного государства. ского и Изборского в 1924–1929 гг. Евсевия Уникальный документ публикует
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition for Marriage Permission Or Dispensation
    Form M2 Revised 9/2009 DIOCESE OF SPOKANE PETITION FOR MARRIAGE PERMISSION OR DISPENSATION GROOM BRIDE Name Name Address Address City, State City, State Date of Birth Date of Birth RELIGION Catholic Catholic Parish: Parish: Place: Place: Baptized non-Catholic Baptized non-Catholic Denomination: Denomination: Unbaptized Unbaptized Scheduled date and place for marriage: The following dispensation and permissions may be granted by the pastor for marriages celebrated within the territory his parish. Otherwise, the petition is submitted to the Local Ordinary. A. Disparity of Cult (C. 1086, a Catholic and a non-baptized person). See reverse side. B. Mixed Religion (and, if necessary, disparity of cult, C. 1124). See reverse side. C. Natural obligations from a prior union (C. 1071 3°). Marriage is permitted only when the pastor or competent authority is sure that these obligations are being fulfilled. D. Permission to marry when conditions are attached to a declaration of nullity—granted only if these stipulations have been fulfilled. (Cf. C. 1684) By virtue of the faculties granted to pastors of the Diocese of Spokane, I hereby grant the above indicated permissions/dispensation. Pastor: Date: (This document is retained in the prenuptial file) See p. 2 of this form for dispensations and permissions reserved to the Local Ordinary (Diocesan bishop, Vicar General or their delegate). Page 1 of 2 Form M2 In cases of Mixed Religion (Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic) or Disparity of Cult, the Catholic party is to make the following promise in writing or orally: “I reaffirm my faith in Jesus Christ and, with God’s help, intend to continue living that faith in the Catholic Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Notes on the Canon Law on Solemnized Marriage
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 2 Number 2 Volume 2, April 1956, Number 2 Article 3 Historical Notes on the Canon Law on Solemnized Marriage William F. Cahill, B.A., J.C.D. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The nature and importance of the Catholic marriage ceremony is best understood in the light of historicalantecedents. With such a perspective, the canon law is not likely to seem arbitrary. HISTORICAL NOTES ON THE CANON LAW ON SOLEMNIZED MARRIAGE WILLIAM F. CAHILL, B.A., J.C.D.* T HE law of the Catholic Church requires, under pain of nullity, that the marriages of Catholics shall be celebrated in the presence of the parties, of an authorized priest and of two witnesses.1 That law is the product of an historical development. The present legislation con- sidered apart from its historical antecedents can be made to seem arbitrary. Indeed, if the historical background is misconceived, the 2 present law may be seen as tyrannical. This essay briefly states the correlation between the present canons and their antecedents in history. For clarity, historical notes are not put in one place, but follow each of the four headings under which the present Church discipline is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Chancery Training Day – Notes
    DIOCESE OF BRENTWOOD Chancery Training Day CHANCERY OFFICE Wednesday, 11th March 2020 Chancery Training Day Wednesday, 11th March 2020 Agenda: 1030: Coffee and Arrivals 1100: Welcome and Notices 1110: Preparing for Marriages I 1150: BREAK 1200: Preparing for Marriages II 1230: Parochial Registers and Archives 1300: Questions 1315: LUNCH 1400: Preparing for RCIA 1430: END Session One: Preparing for Marriages Paperwork basics: o The paperwork for marriage is to be done in the parish in which at least one of the parties resides. If the parties live separately they can choose to do the paperwork in either parish, not both (unless it is a one party application). Given that some (if not most) couples co-habit before marriage this means that independent of where the parties plan to marry, the paperwork needs to be done in the home parish. o Problems arise when those not regularly practicing don’t realise there is paperwork to be completed in the home parish and, if they are marrying outside the home parish/diocese, the cleric who is marrying them doesn’t mention anything. Perhaps parishes will consider a biennial announcement/notice to remind couples and families of this. o The Chancery Office will not process marriage papers sent in more than six months in advance of the wedding date. In the peak season it may not be possible to process papers sent in fewer than six to eight weeks before the wedding date. Please contact us in advance of sending in these papers. Please note that this does not mean that parishes shouldn’t start the paperwork more than six months before the wedding date.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CELEBRATION OP MARRIAGE in CANADA a Comparative Study
    538 THE CELEBRATION OP MARRIAGE IN CANADA A Comparative Study of Civil and Canon Law outside of the Province of Quebec by Leo G. iiinz, O.S.t. St. Peter's Abbey, Muenater, bask. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law of the Catholic University of Ottawa in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Canon Law • -N " . • ^ °« THF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OP OTTAWA -0:;?/g Ottawa, Ontario TtU •^ '\ 1953 B»tlOTH*QU<:S * %*,y of O** UMI Number: DC53897 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform DC53897 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI48106-1346 DEDICATED TO THE PIONEER MONKS OF ST. PETER'S ABBEY ON THE OCCASION OF THE GOLDEN JUBILEE OF FOUNDATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages FOREWORD Viii ABBREVIATIONS xii Chapter 1. PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION 1 Article 1. The law ;-T0vernin»: the celebration of marriage 1 Article 2. Provincial powers ever marriage 3 Article 3. Invalidating force of statutory requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud and Error in the Canon Law of Marriage
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 1 Number 2 Volume 1, April 1955, Number 2 Article 2 Fraud and Error in the Canon Law of Marriage William F. Cahill, B.A., J.C.D. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religion Law Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This is the first of two articles designed to enable the common law lawyer to distinguish civil annulments for fraud from Roman Catholic declarations of nullity on grounds of defective consent. FRAUD AND ERROR IN THE CANON LAW OF MARRIAGE WILLIAM F. CAHILL, B.A., J.C.D.* A READER OF THE CATHOLIC LAWYER has asked for a statement of the Canon Law on fraudulent marriage. The direct answer is that there is no Canon Law on the subject because fraud, as such, makes marriage neither void nor even voidable in the law of the Catholic Church.' It is understandable that lawyers who are familiar with civil annul- ments - particularly as they are granted in New York State - might well misunderstand the grounds upon which the Catholic Church grants declarations of nullity. It is possible, for instance, that a marriage which has been annulled on grounds of fraud by a civil court might also be declared null and void from its inception by an ecclesiastical court on the grounds that error had vitiated the consent of one of the parties at the time of the marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispensation-Form.Pdf
    THE OFFICE FOR CANONICAL AFFAIRS CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF HONOLULU ST. STEPHEN DIOCESAN CENTER 6301 PALI HIGHWAY, KĀNE'OHE, HAWAI'I 96744-5224 [808] 203-6766 WWW.CATHOLICHAWAII.ORG/CIC Petition for Marriage Dispensation and Permission Groom: ____________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________ City: ________________________________________ State/Zip (or Country): ___________________ Religion: Latin (Roman) Catholic Other (specify): ____________________________ Bride: ____________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________ City: ________________________________________ State/Zip (or Country): ___________________ Religion: Latin (Roman) Catholic Other (specify): ____________________________ Date of marriage (or validation): _______________________________________ Name of priest/deacon (print): ____________________________________________________ Name of parish: ______________________________________________ Address of parish: ____________________________________________________________________ Mixed Marriage Permission or Disparity of Cult Dispensation Check one: Dispensation from disparity of cult Mixed marriage permission (with disparity of cult granted as a precaution) Reason for mixed marriage permission or disparity of cult dispensation – check all that apply: Spiritual good of the parties Danger of mere civil union Validation of a civil marriage Hope of conversion of non-Catholic Promise of the Catholic (to
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 1 PRENUPTIAL INQUIRY in Accord with the Directives of The
    OFFICE OF THE TRIBUNAL Diocese of Duluth • 2830 East Fourth Street • Duluth, Minnesota 55812-1501 Tel: (218) 724-9111 • Fax: (218) 724-2221 • www.dioceseduluth.org PRENUPTIAL INQUIRY In accord with the directives of the Bishops of the Province of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, the Diocese of Duluth asks that all couples complete a 6-month period of marriage preparation. This Questionnaire must be filled out at the beginning of the marriage preparation process in order to ensure that both parties to the marriage are free to marry before other preparation is conducted. GROOM Proof of Baptism is required. The Baptismal Certificate (with notations) of a Catholic must be issued within the last six months. Full Legal Name ________________________________________________ Phone _____________________________ Street Address ____________________________________________ City, State________________________________ E -mail Address Length of residence at above address _____________________ Current Religion________________________________ Present Parish ____________________________________________ City, State________________________________ Date of Birth ____________________ City, State of Birth __________________________________________________ Date of Baptism _________________ Place of Baptism ____________________________________________________ (Parish/Church) (City, State) Father’s name: __________________________________________________ Religion:___________________________ Mother’ s maiden name:____________________________________________ Religion:___________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Annulment in Church and State
    DePaul Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 Spring-Summer 1956 Article 2 Annulment in Church and State Albert A. Vail Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Albert A. Vail, Annulment in Church and State, 5 DePaul L. Rev. 216 (1956) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol5/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANNULMENT IN CHURCH1 AND STATE2 ALBERT A. VAIL SA RESULT of the position which a lawyer occupies in his com- munity and of the very nature of the practice of law, nearly every legal practitioner from time to time is consulted about marriage problems. Perhaps in no other type of problem, upon which we attorneys are consulted, do we have such a good opportunity to act as social physicians as in the case of marital problems which are presented to us. Many of the persons who present their marriage difficulties to the lawyer are Catholics. Regardless of the religious tenets of the attorney, he will recognize the fact that his Catholic client is bound by two systems of law, the civil and the ecclesiastical. Knowing this he will be conscious of the fact that if he is to reach a solution to the problem, a solution which will be truly beneficial to his client, it must needs be a solution which is in conformity with both systems of law to which his client is subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, and CONTINUING EDUCATION
    Scroll down for Presione aquí por \Ç à{x fÑ|Ü|à Éy XÇ xÄ XáÑ•Ü|àâ wx VtÇt VtÇö Guidelines for Pastoral Guías Pastorales Para el Outreach to Matrimonio Cristiano: Christian Marriage: Formación, Preparación, Formation, Preparation, Celebración y Educación Celebration, and Continuing Continua Education In the Spirit of Cana Guidelines for Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, AND CONTINUING EDUCATION www.marriageandfamilyministries.org | 312.534.8351 © 2005 Marriage and Family Ministries Office, Archdiocese of Chicago Revised 2015 The following people were instrumental in the development of this document. They served as the Revision Committee who created the general framework of the document. We thank them for their dedication to this project: Rafael and Olga Anglada Father Jim Heneghan Bishop Tom Paprocki Valentín Araya–Mesén Father Tom Hickey Elsie P. Radtke Tim and Connie Bultema Father Patrick Lagges Father George Rassas Father John Cusick Mike and Pam Lilly Alicia Rivera Maria Garcia Bishop Jerome Listecki Deacon Larry and Fran Spohr John Green Andrew Lyke Kevin and Crystal Sullivan Frank Hannigan Father Bill McNulty Joanna Stroncek Particular thanks go to Martha Burke Tressler for her work on “Marriage After the Death of a Spouse” and “Prayers of the Faithful,” Sister Joan McGuire, Rita George, and Father John Kartje for their help with the “Ecumenical Marriages” and “Interfaith Marriages” sections; Nora O’Callahan for her guidance on the “Previous Abortion” section; Richard C. Sparks, C.S.P., Ph.D., for his input in the “Special Circumstances” section that deals with health concerns; Christine Zambricki–Flaherty for her work on the “Cross–Cultural Issues” section; and Father Richard Saudis for his final review and valuable input to the document.
    [Show full text]
  • NULLITY of MARRIAGE
    NULLITY of MARRIAGE New Edition--Revised and Enlarged F. J. Sheed SHEED AND WARD--NEW YORK Copyright SHEED & WARD, INC., 1959 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER 59-10656 NIHIL OBSTAT: JOHN R. READY CENSOR LIBRORUM MAY 22,1959 IMPRIMATUR: +ROBERT F. JOYCE BISHOP OF BURLINGTON MAY 28,1959 TO THE LAW SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY THIS SMALL TOKEN OF GREAT GRATITUDE Preface to the Second Edition This is not a book on marriage; but only on those cases where marriage appears to be but is not. It is directly concerned with the law of the Catholic Church, but in the first edition I introduced comparisons with the law of England. I have been asked to introduce comparisons with American Law as well, because its historic connection with Church Law is considerably less than England's. As each of the fifty States has its own marriage law, and it would have been impossible to study them all, I chose that of New York. New York's Marriage Law was not taught in the Sydney University Law School in my day, as any American who chances on this book will guess. But its rules, like those of England, are stated here only in their general form, exceptions or modifications not being mentioned where they would not affect the principle. The subject of the book is Church Law. The object of the comparison is not to make civil law and Church law look as much alike as possible, in the hope that the great mass of similarity may lead to an indulgent overlooking of the points on which the Church differs; but to show her laws more clearly by noting how two other codes treat the same problems.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Canonical Form Of
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Canon Law © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Benone Farcas Washington, D.C. 2010 The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. Benone Farcas, J.C.D. Director: John Beal, J.C.D. Book IV of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, title VII, chapter V and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, title XVI, chapter VII, article VI govern the canonical form of marriage. In many ways the provisions of the two codes are similar; in some instances, however, they differ. Both the similarities and the differences have pastoral consequences, especially in cases of mixed marriages or in territories where a hierarchical organization of various Oriental Catholic churches sui iuris does not exist. The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the canonical form of marriage by comparing the Latin and Oriental canonical legislations and analyzing the pastoral consequences that arise when laws concerning canonical form of marriage are applied in specific areas, especially in light of recent political and social changes in Eastern Europe. This comparative study of the canonical form of the marriage in the Latin and in the Catholic Oriental law, especially within the Byzantine rite, begins with an historical overview of the issue in both the Latin and the Byzantine traditions focused on specific documents and circumstances that had a significant impact on the evolution of canonical form.
    [Show full text]
  • Prek – 12 Religion Course of Study Diocese of Toledo 2018
    PreK – 12 Religion Course of Study --- Diocese of Toledo --- 2018 PreK – 12 Religion Course of Study Diocese of Toledo 2018 Page 1 of 260 PreK – 12 Religion Course of Study --- Diocese of Toledo --- 2018 Page 2 of 260 PreK – 12 Religion Course of Study --- Diocese of Toledo --- 2018 TABLEU OF CONTENTS PreKU – 8 Course of Study U Introduction .......................................................................................................................7 PreK – 8 Content Structure: Scripture and Pillars of Catechism ..............................9 PreK – 8 Subjects by Grade Chart ...............................................................................11 Grade Pre-K ....................................................................................................................13 Grade K ............................................................................................................................20 Grade 1 ............................................................................................................................29 Grade 2 ............................................................................................................................43 Grade 3 ............................................................................................................................58 Grade 4 ............................................................................................................................72 Grade 5 ............................................................................................................................85
    [Show full text]