Crisis of Meanings in the Oceans: Experiences from Victoria, Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crisis of Meanings in the Oceans: Experiences from Victoria, Australia Between the devil and the deep blue sea – Negotiating ambiguous physical and social boundaries within the shark fishing industry of Bass Strait, Australia. Tanya J King Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies University of Melbourne ii This thesis addresses questions of identity and ontological legitimacy within the commercial shark fishing community of Bass Strait, Australia. I consider the implications of competing discourses for the integrity of fisher identity, environmental conservation and public narratives on environmental ‘crises’. I draw upon ethnographic material developed with commercial fishers and, to a lesser extent, fisheries ‘experts’, to explore ambiguities in understandings of individuality and perceptions of the marine environment. Informing this analysis are theories of practice, particularly notions of embodied relationships and knowledge, the role of ‘luck’ in enabling a particular expression of ‘individuality’, the ‘skipper effect’, a consideration of nation-state sanctioned and popular media representations of the environment, and the peculiarly Australian experience and representation of individuality, both as performance and as trope. These themes are considered against a backdrop of the physical and social activities involved in commercial fishing, and the 2001 nation-state-initiated introduction of an Individual Transferable Quota management system. A thematic link throughout the thesis is the role played by perceived boundaries in physical and social environments. I describe how commercial shark fishers and fisheries ‘experts’ encounter boundaries, and how they are strategically created, dissolved, enforced and ignored in the realisation of agency. The demarcations which are particularly salient in the range of contexts considered are those which bound the ‘individual’, and those which distinguish between human and non- human environments. While small-scale fishers explicitly venerate ‘individuality’, the productive reality demands a level of cooperation. Many Australian commercial shark fishers ‘pick partners’ in order to locate and track fish, while attempting to maintain enough secrecy so that shoals are not iii shared among so many boats as to be economically unviable. By strategically claiming individuality, fishers are tactfully and legitimately able to withdraw from particular partnerships, freeing them to invest in alternative relationships. Within a community of like-minded others, it is precisely the ambiguity of inter-personal boundaries that facilitates the agency of fishers, enabling them to variously privilege individuality or sociality as the productive context demands. The paradox between professed individuality and serial cooperation has been addressed in the Australian context through descriptions of ‘mateship’ as a trope for rendering ambiguity innocuous. In emic narratives on individual success, Australian and international small- scale fishers often refer to ‘luck’ rather than to collectively enabled performance. In etic depictions of individual fishing success also, most notably in the ‘skipper effect’ literature, anthropologists have referred to ‘luck’ in contexts where a consideration of collective activity might have yielded a more accurate explanation of individual success. While ‘individuality’ is a vital component of small-scale fisher identity, it necessarily operates as a component of sociality. Though fisheries ‘experts’ also negotiate ambiguous boundaries strategically, their interpretive licence is restricted by the rigidity of the parameters they encounter as agents of the nation-state: as civil- servants. The context of their experience is vastly different to that typically encountered by fishers. Centralised bureaucratic management systems rigidly define the ocean, commercial fishers and civil-servants according to criteria that tends to be generic, demonstrable, replicable and quantifiable. From a nation-state perspective, those features which are salient to the management of commercial fishing are different to those perceived by commercial fishers themselves. As nation-state authority affords ontological legitimacy to bureaucratic decrees on ‘the iv marine environment’, fishers are increasingly compelled to defer to the authority of this tangible domain in their role as ‘citizen’. In the process, however, the ambiguity of various boundaries is compromised and the efficacy of fisher ‘individuality’ is attenuated. These groupings – commercial fishers and fisheries ‘experts’ – are not unproblematic. However, the domains of experience encountered by these two groups are different enough to occasion the development of significantly distinct categories of meaning. Adding complexity to the situation is the investment by all of these people in a more general cultural domain manifest in media representations of ‘the environment’. I explore some of the complexities and disruptions which emerge when commercial fishers and national fisheries regulators come together to discuss an ocean and a group of people which they experience – understand – in distinct ways. Towards the end of the thesis I draw together emergent themes such as individuality, agency, ambiguity, boundaries, experience and ontology, and consider these themes in relation to the ethnographic material My purpose is not to merely highlight these differences, but to consider the durability of particular ways of seeing the world, and to muse over what can happen when those with minority perspectives are compelled to adjust their behaviours, understandings and identities in response to boundaries and categories that do not correspond to their existing systems of meaning. v This is to certify that: (i) the thesis comprises only my original work towards the PhD except where indicated in the Preface, (ii) due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used, (iii) the thesis is less than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, citations, bibliographies and appendices. vi Even when we are able to go beyond the stereotypes, and acknowledge that essentially every sector of industry, government, science, policy, and management have contributed to the current states of fisheries, many genuinely hard problems remain to be resolved ….We need to abandon our stereotypes about others. We need to be honest but forgiving about the short-comings of every participant in the entire process. We need to know how we are imperfect, and what those imperfections imply. Then we need to get on with doing the most perfect job possible with imperfect people and imperfect processes. It’s a lot like the rest of life. – Jake Rice, Finlayson Revisited – What has changed since Fishing For Truth was published? (2001:9). vii Dedicated to the memory of Dylan and the Ripple III viii 1 Acknowledgements: An inevitably inadequate attempt to thank those who have made this thesis possible At the beginning of 2001, I moved to the fishing port of Port Albert, where l lived for a further two years. I spent a lot of time in other ports, mostly in the state of Victoria, particularly Port Welshpool and Lakes Entrance. However, the attendance at various management meetings also took me to the states of South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. My time was divided among talking with local fishermen, attending meetings between fishermen and various official bodies (particularly AFMA), both locally and interstate, going on fishing trips, and working as a waitress at the Pier Port Hotel in Port Welshpool. I also spent a week observing the operation of the shark sector of management at the offices of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, in Canberra. At the beginning of 2003, I returned to Melbourne to begin the arduous task of writing about my experiences, impressions, understandings and all of the things that people had told me. I moved into a house in Clifton Hill with two friends – Claire and Julian – who were also working on PhDs. I claimed an office in the School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies and eased back into the vibrant and supportive community of colleagues – staff and fellow students – at the University of Melbourne. 1 All sea creature images courtesy Dover Publications Inc. (2002). ix At the beginning of 2004, after a year of churning out ghastly drivel, which my ever-patient supervisors diligently read, I colluded with Simone Blair, a fellow maritime anthropologist, to make a break for it. Setting our sights inland we headed for central China. A landslide or two later, my love of the sea was reinvigorated and I returned to Melbourne with a story to tell. Edging toward the end of 2006, I have my story. Now I am confronted with the task of thanking those who have supported me through the last six years, who have shared their lives with me, shown me generosity, professionalism, patience, kindness, friendship, humour, resilience, perspective, well-deserved criticism and wisdom. To all of the fishermen and industry-based people I have met – I thank you for the enormous amounts of time and knowledge you so generously shared with me and the faith so many of you have in me. Though I take full responsibility for the shortcomings contained in this document, this amazing story is yours, and I feel priveledged to have been allowed to try to capture it in words: a futile goal, I know, but here is my best attempt. I hope that when you recognise yourself in
Recommended publications
  • Grimes County Bride Marriage Index 1846-1916
    BRIDE GROOM DATE MONTH YEAR BOOK PAGE ABEL, Amelia STRATTON, S. T. 15 Jan 1867 ABSHEUR, Emeline DOUTMAN, James 21 Apr 1870 ADAMS, Catherine STUCKEY, Robert 10 Apr 1866 ADAMS, R. C. STUCKEY, Robert 24 Jan 1864 ADKINS, Andrea LEE, Edward 25 Dec 1865 ADKINS, Cathrine RAILEY, William Warren 11 Feb 1869 ADKINS, Isabella WILLIS, James 11 Dec 1868 ADKINS, M. J. FRANKLIN, F. H. 24 Jan 1864 ADLEY, J. PARNELL, W. S. 15 Dec 1865 ALBERTSON, R. J. SMITH, S. V. 21 Aug 1869 ALBERTSON, Sarah GOODWIN, Jeff 23 Feb 1870 ALDERSON, Mary A. LASHLEY, George 15 Aug 1861 ALEXANDER, Mary ABRAM, Thomas 12 Jun 1870 ALLEN, Adline MOTON, Cesar 31 Dec 1870 ALLEN, Nelly J. WASHINGTON, George 18 Mar 1867 ALLEN, Rebecca WADE, William 5 Aug 1868 ALLEN, S. E. DELL, P. W. 21 Oct 1863 ALLEN, Sylvin KELLUM, Isaah 29 Dec 1870 ALSBROOK, Leah CARLEY, William 25 Nov 1866 ALSTON, An ANDERS, Joseph 9 Nov 1866 ANDERS, Mary BRIDGES, Taylor 26 Nov 1868 ANDERSON, Jemima LE ROY, Sam 28 Nov 1867 ANDERSON, Phillis LAWSON, Moses 11 May 1867 ANDREWS, Amanda ANDREWS, Sime 10 Mar 1871 ARIOLA, Viney TREADWELL, John J. 21 Feb 1867 ARMOUR, Mary Ann DAVIS, Alexander 5 Aug 1852 ARNOLD, Ann JOHNSON, Edgar 15 Apr 1869 ARNOLD, Mary E. (Mrs.) LUXTON, James M. 7 Oct 1868 ARRINGTON, Elizabeth JOHNSON, Elbert 31 Jul 1866 ARRINGTON, Martha ROACH, W. R. 5 Jan 1870 ARRIOLA, Mary STONE, William 9 Aug 1849 ASHFORD, J. J. E. DALLINS, R. P. 10 Nov 1858 ASHFORD, L. A. MITCHELL, J. M. 5 Jun 1865 ASHFORD, Lydia MORRISON, Horace 20 Jan 1866 ASHFORD, Millie WRIGHT, Randal 23 Jul 1870 ASHFORD, Susan GRISHAM, Thomas C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1964 Annual Report and Accounts
    REPORT AND ACCOUNTS I964 t c Directors F. J. TEMPEL, Chairman J. F. KNIGHT GEORGE COLE, Vice-Chairman ANDREW M. KNOX RUDOLF G. JURGENS, Vice-Chairman P. KUIN COLIN BAXTER D. J. MA" J. P. VAN DEN BERGH J. F. VAN MOORSEL A. F. H. BLAAUW F. J. PEDLER A. D. BONHAM CARTER R. H. SIDDONS A. W. J. CARON E. SMIT H. S. A. HARTOG A. H. SMITH M. M. VAN HENGEL J. P. STUBBS A. J. C. HOSKYNS-ABRAHALL S. G. SWEETMAN G. D. A. KLIJNSTRA E. G. WOODROOFE Advisory Directors J. M. HONIG K. P. VAN DER MANDELE A. E. J. NYSINGH J. E. DE QUAY PAUL RIJKENS JHR. J. A. G. SANDBERG Secretaries E. A. HOFMAN P. A. MACRORY Auditors PRICE WATERHOUSE & Co. COOPER BROTHERS & Co. This is a translation of the original Dutch report. c B B c s Contents Page SalientFigures ................................. 6 Report of the Directors ........................ 7-32 The Year in Brief.. ............................ 7 Sales to Third Parties, Profit and Capital Employed by Geographical Areas 1955 and 1964 (Chart) ..... 8 Return on Capital Employed and on Turnover 1955-1964 (Chart) ............................. 9 Summary of Combined Figures 1955-1964. ........ 10 The Background ............................... 11 European Integration ........................... 11 The Developing Countries ...................... 12 Taxation ..................................... 12 Analysis of Turnover ........................... 15 Margarine and Other Edible Fats ................ 16 Other Foods ................................... 17 Detergents .................................... 19 Toilet Preparations
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Overviw of the Beaufort Inlet Cape Lookout Area of North
    by June 21, 1982 You can stand on Cape Point at Hatteras on a stormy day and watch two oceans come together in an awesome display of savage fury; for there at the Point the northbound Gulf Stream and the cold currents coming down from the Arctic run head- on into each other, tossing their spumy spray a hundred feet or better into the air and dropping sand and shells and sea life at the point of impact. Thus is formed the dreaded Diamond Shoals, its fang-like shifting sand bars pushing seaward to snare the unwary mariner. Seafaring men call it the Graveyard of the Atlantic. Actually, the Graveyard extends along the whole of the North Carolina coast, northward past Chicamacomico, Bodie Island, and Nags Head to Currituck Beach, and southward in gently curving arcs to the points of Cape Lookout and Cape Fear. The bareribbed skeletons of countless ships are buried there; some covered only by water, with a lone spar or funnel or rusting winch showing above the surface; others burrowed deep in the sands, their final resting place known only to the men who went down with them. From the days of the earliest New World explorations, mariners have known the Graveyard of the Atlantic, have held it in understandable awe, yet have persisted in risking their vessels and their lives in its treacherous waters. Actually, they had no choice in the matter, for a combination of currents, winds, geography, and economics have conspired to force many of them to sail along the North Carolina coast if they wanted to sail at all!¹ Thus begins David Stick’s Graveyard of the Atlantic (1952), a thoroughly researched, comprehensive, and finely-crafted history of shipwrecks along the entire coast of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Natural Values in Tasmania
    Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania JUNE 2016 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Acknowledgements Thanks to the support we received in particular from Clarissa Murphy who gave six months as a volunteer in the first phase of the sea level rise risk assessment work. We also had considerable technical input from a range of people on various aspects of the work, including Hans and Annie Wapstra, Richard Schahinger, Tim Rudman, John Church, and Anni McCuaig. We acknowledge the hard work over a number of years from the Sea Level Rise Impacts Working Group: Oberon Carter, Louise Gilfedder, Felicity Faulkner, Lynne Sparrow (DPIPWE), Eric Woehler (BirdLife Tasmania) and Chris Sharples (University of Tasmania). This report was compiled by Oberon Carter, Felicity Faulkner, Louise Gilfedder and Peter Voller from the Natural Values Conservation Branch. Citation DPIPWE (2016) Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania. Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-74380-009-6 Cover View to Mount Cameron West by Oberon Carter. Pied Oystercatcher by Mick Brown. The Pied Oystercatcher is considered to have a very high exposure to sea level rise under both a national assessment and Tasmanian assessment. Its preferred habitat is mudflats, sandbanks and sandy ocean beaches, all vulnerable to inundation and erosion. Round-leaved Pigface (Disphyma australe) in flower in saltmarsh at Lauderdale by Iona Mitchell. Three saltmarsh communities are associated with the coastal zone and are considered at risk from sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Island an Historical Overview
    Introduction. In June 1840 the Port Officer of Hobart Captain W. Moriarty wrote to the Governor of Van Diemen’s Land, Sir John Franklin suggesting that lighthouses should be erected in Bass Strait. On February 3rd. 1841 Sir John Franklin wrote to Sir George Gipps, Governor of New South Wales seeking his co-operation. Government House, Van Diemen’s Land. 3rd. February 1841 My Dear Sir George. ………………….This matter has occupied much of my attention since my arrival in the Colony, and recent ocurances in Bass Strait have given increased importance to the subject, within the four years of my residence here, two large barques have been entirely wrecked there, a third stranded a brig lost with all her crew, besides two or three colonial schooners, whose passengers and crew shared the same fate, not to mention the recent loss of the Clonmell steamer, the prevalence of strong winds, the uncertainty of either the set or force of the currents, the number of small rocks, islets and shoals, which though they appear on the chart, have but been imperfectly surveyed, combine to render Bass Strait under any circumstances an anxious passage for seamen to enter. The Legislative Council, Votes and Proceedings between 1841 – 42 had much correspondence on the viability of erecting lighthouses in Bass Strait including Deal Island. In 1846 construction of the lightstation began on Deal Island with the lighthouse completed in February 1848. The first keeper William Baudinet, his wife and seven children arriving on the island in March 1848. From 1816 to 1961 about 18 recorded shipwrecks have occurred in the vicinity of Deal Island, with the Bulli (1877) and the Karitane (1921) the most well known of these shipwrecks.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images Can Be Accessed in the Indiana Room
    Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images can be accessed in the Indiana Room. Call (812)949-3527 for more information. Groom Bride Marriage Date Image Aaron, Elza Antle, Marion 8/12/1928 026-048 Abbott, Charles Ruby, Hallie June 8/19/1935 030-580 Abbott, Elmer Beach, Hazel 12/9/1922 022-243 Abbott, Leonard H. Robinson, Berta 4/30/1926 024-324 Abel, Oscar C. Ringle, Alice M. 1/11/1930 027-067 Abell, Lawrence A. Childers, Velva 4/28/1930 027-154 Abell, Steve Blakeman, Mary Elizabeth 12/12/1928 026-207 Abernathy, Pete B. Scholl, Lorena 10/15/1926 024-533 Abram, Howard Henry Abram, Elizabeth F. 3/24/1934 029-414 Absher, Roy Elgin Turner, Georgia Lillian 4/17/1926 024-311 Ackerman, Emil Becht, Martha 10/18/1927 025-380 Acton, Dewey Baker, Mary Cathrine 3/17/1923 022-340 Adam, Herman Glen Harpe, Mary Allia 4/11/1936 031-273 Adam, Herman Glenn Hinton, Esther 8/13/1927 025-282 Adams, Adelbert Pope, Thelma 7/14/1927 025-255 Adams, Ancil Logan, Jr. Eiler, Lillian Mae 4/8/1933 028-570 Adams, Cecil A. Johnson, Mary E. 12/21/1923 022-706 Adams, Crozier E. Sparks, Sarah 4/1/1936 031-250 Adams, Earl Snook, Charlotte 1/5/1935 030-250 Adams, Harry Meyer, Lillian M. 10/21/1927 025-376 Adams, Herman Glen Smith, Hazel Irene 2/28/1925 023-502 Adams, James O. Hallet, Louise M. 4/3/1931 027-476 Adams, Lloyd Kirsch, Madge 6/7/1932 028-274 Adams, Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Ships and Ship-Building Days of Medford 1630-1873
    OLD SHIPS AND SHIP-BUILDING DAYS OF MEDFORD 1630-1873 By HALL GLEASON WEST MEDFORD, MASS. 1936 -oV Q. co U © O0 •old o 3 § =a « § S5 O T3». Sks? r '■ " ¥ 5 s<3 H " as< -,-S.s« «.,; H u « CxJ S Qm § -°^ fc. u§i G rt I Uh This book was reproduced by the Medford Co-operative Bank. January 1998 Officers Robert H. Surabian, President & CEO Ralph W. Dunham, Executive Vice President Henry T. Sampson, Jr., Senior Vice President Thomas Burke, Senior Vice President Deborah McNeill, Senior Vice President John O’Donnell, Vice President John Line, Vice President Annette Hunt, Vice President Sherry Ambrose, Assistant Vice President Pauline L. Sampson, Marketing & Compliance Officer Patricia lozza, Mortgage Servicing Officer Directors John J. McGlynn, Chairman of the Board Julie Bemardin John A. Hackett Richard M. Kazanjian Dennis Raimo Lorraine P. Silva Robert H. Surabian CONTENTS. Chapter Pagf. I. Early Ships 7 II. 1800-1812 . 10 III. War of 1812 19 IV. 1815-1850 25 V. The Pepper Trade 30 VI. The California Clipper Ship Era . 33 VII. Storms and Shipwrecks . 37 VIII. Development of the American Merchant Vessel 48 IX. Later Clipper Ships 52 X. Medford-Built Vessels . 55 Index 81 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Page Clipper Ship Thatcher Magoun Frontispiece Medford Ship-Builders 7 Yankee Privateer 12 Mary Pollock Subtitle from Kipling’s “Derelict *’ 13 Heave to 20 The Squall . 20 A Whaler 21 Little White Brig 21 Little Convoy 28 Head Seas 28 Ship Lucilla 28 Brig Magoun 29 Clipper Ship Ocean Express 32 Ship Paul Jones” 32 Clipper Ship “Phantom” 32 Bark Rebecca Goddard” 33 Clipper Ship Ringleader” 36 Ship Rubicon 36 Ship Bazaar 36 Ship Cashmere 37 Clipper Ship Herald of the Morning” 44 Bark Jones 44 Clipper Ship Sancho Panza 44 Clipper Ship “Shooting Star 45 Ship “Sunbeam” .
    [Show full text]
  • 1959 Annual Report
    REPORT & ACCOUNTS I959 U Nt I L E V E R REPORT & ACCOUNTS UNILEVER N.V. F. J. TEMPEL - CHAIRMAN SIDNEY J. VAN DEN BERGH -VICE-CHAIRMAN THE LORD HEYWORTH -VICE-CHAIRMAN COLIN BAXTER G. D. A. KLIJNSTRA J. P. VAN DEN BERGH J. F. KNIGHT A. F. H. BLAAUW ANDREW M. KNOX A. D. BONHAM CARTER D. J. MANN A. W. J. CARON J. F. VAN MOORSEL GEORGE COLE F. D. MORRELL J. A. CONNEL F. J. PEDLER HAROLD HARTOG R. H. SIDDONS M. M. VAN HENGEL A. H. SMITH RUDOLF G. JURGENS J. P. STUBBS E. G. WOODROOFE A H. M. HIRSCHFELD J. M. HONIG K. P. VAN DER MANDELE PAUL RIJKENS JHR. J. A. G. SANDBERG H. L. WOLTERSOM E. A. HOFMAN AU s PRICE WATERHOUSE & Co. COOPER BROTHERS & Co. This is a translation of the original Dutch refjort. AllJTgures relate to the J~.F'. and LLWTED Groups combined 1958 1959 F1. F1. 18,388,000,000 TURNOVER............ 19,O 16,000,000 976,000,000 TRADINGPROFIT .......... 1,207,000,000 490,000,000 TAXATIONFORTHEYEAR...... 594,000,000 32,000,000 EXCEPTIONALPROFITS ....... 43,000,000 503,000,000 CONSOLIDATEDNET PROFIT ..... 640,000,000 105,000,000 ORDINARYDIVIDENDS ........ 146,000,000 * 18 "3 "0 N.V.. ............ 20 "lo * 4s. 2.4d. LIMITED (PER E 1 OF CAPITAL) ... 4s. 6.5d." 360,000,000 PROFITRETAINED IN THE BUSINESS ... 454,000,000 5,598,000,000 CAPITALEMPLOYED ........ 6,140,000,000 429,000,000 EXPENDITUREON FIXED ASSETS (NET). 439,000,000 244,000,000 DEPRECIATION.......... 271,000,000 %. %. On increased capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20Pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2
    16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 1 The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2 Unilever House, London, c1930 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 03 In September 1929 an agreement was signed which created what The Economist described as "one of the biggest industrial amalgamations in European history". It provided for the merger in the following year of the Margarine Union and Lever Brothers Limited. The Margarine Union had been formed in 1927 by the Van den Bergh and Jurgens companies based in the Netherlands, and was later joined by a number of other Dutch and central European companies. Its main strength lay in Europe, especially Germany and the UK and its interests, whilst mostly in margarine and other edible fats, were also oil milling and animal feeds, retail companies and some soap production. Lever Brothers Limited was based in the UK but owned companies throughout the world, especially in Europe, the United States and the British Dominions. Its interests were in soap, toilet preparations, food (including some margarine), oil milling and animal feeds, plantations and African trading. One of the main reasons for the merger was competition for raw materials - animal and vegetable oils - used in both the manufacture of margarine and soap. However, the two businesses were very similar, so it made sense to merge as Unilever rather than continue to compete for the same raw materials and in the same markets. To understand how Unilever came into being you have to go back to the family companies that were instrumental in its formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Grocery Goliaths
    HOW FOOD MONOPOLIES IMPACT CONSUMERS About Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch works to ensure the food, water and fish we consume is safe, accessible and sustainable. So we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of where their food comes from, keep clean, affordable, public tap water flowing freely to our homes, protect the environmental quality of oceans, force government to do its job protecting citizens, and educate about the importance of keeping shared resources under public control. Food & Water Watch California Office 1616 P St. NW, Ste. 300 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 1100 Washington, DC 20036 Oakland, CA 94612 tel: (202) 683-2500 tel: (510) 922-0720 fax: (202) 683-2501 fax: (510) 922-0723 [email protected] [email protected] foodandwaterwatch.org Copyright © December 2013 by Food & Water Watch. All rights reserved. This report can be viewed or downloaded at foodandwaterwatch.org. HOW FOOD MONOPOLIES IMPACT CONSUMERS Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . 3 Supersizing the Supermarket . 3 The Rise of Monolithic Food Manufacturers. 4 Intense consolidation throughout the supermarket . 7 Consumer choice limited. 7 Storewide domination by a few firms . 8 Supermarket Strategies to Manipulate Shoppers . 9 Sensory manipulation . .10 Product placement . .10 Slotting fees and category captains . .11 Advertising and promotions . .11 Conclusion and Recommendations. .12 Appendix A: Market Share of 100 Grocery Items . .13 Appendix B: Top Food Conglomerates’ Widespread Presence in the Grocery Store . .27 Methodology . .29 Endnotes. .30 Executive Summary Safeway.4 Walmart alone sold nearly a third (28.8 5 Groceries are big business, with Americans spending percent) of all groceries in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • (Surname in Parentheses) = Bride's Maiden Name * = Colored LI = Date
    LAST FIRST Current AGE POB LAST FIRST Current AGE POB Date of NAME NAME Residence NAME NAME Residence Marriage BRIDE BRIDE GROOM GROOM Aaron Mildred Irvington, NJ 26 PA Calabrese Edward Newark, NJ 25 NJ 20 May 1940 Elizabeth Abel Catherine Triangle, VA 18 VA Allen James Triangle, VA 23 VA 16 Dec 1939 Virginia Monroe Abel Dorothy Quantico, VA 18 VA Gass Edward Quantico, VA 28 MA 2 Sep 1939 Louise Abrams Miriam Ventnor City, 21 NJ Fertick Albert Philadelphia, 22 PA 29 Jul 1940 Frances NJ Abraham PA Abramson Sylvia Flushing, LI, 34 NY Tush Joseph Flushing, LI, 32 NY 23 Feb 1940 NY Sanford NY Accardi Anna Queens Village, 26 NY DiMaria Frank Brooklyn, NY 36 ITA 10 Oct 1940 (Aloi) NY Acha Myrtle Pontiac, MI 24 MI Ferguson John Nesbit Detroit, MI 35 PA 8 Apr 1939 Violet Rita Achter Sylvia Philadelphia, 21 NY Cohen Albert Philadelphia, 24 PA 29 Jul 1940 Beatrice PA PA Acker Edna Mae Philadelphia, 22 PA Tranausky Edward Philadelphia, 23 PA 11 May 1940 PA Martin PA Ackoff Anne Nancy Philadelphia, 22 PA Wallen Albert David Philadelphia, 35 PA 30 Jul 1940 PA PA Acty Sarah Washington, 21 VA Jones Bernard Glendale, MD 23 MD *5 Jul 1940 Elizabeth DC Summerfield POB = Place of Birth (Surname in parentheses) = Bride’s Maiden Name * = Colored LI = Date License Issued LAST FIRST Current AGE POB LAST FIRST Current AGE POB Date of NAME NAME Residence NAME NAME Residence Marriage BRIDE BRIDE GROOM GROOM Adair Mildred Jacksonville, 24 LA Hanlon Jack Harrisville, PA 24 PA 6 Jul 1939 FL Adair Margaret Washington, 42 DC Lane Franklin Washington, 44 CA 14 Oct 1939
    [Show full text]