Fabulous Firsts: Sardinia (January 1, 1851) (Much of This Article Comes from a “World of Stamps” Study of Sardinia by Geir Sør-Reime in Mekeel’S & STAMPS.)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fabulous Firsts: Sardinia (January 1, 1851) (Much of This Article Comes from a “World of Stamps” Study of Sardinia by Geir Sør-Reime in Mekeel’S & STAMPS.) Fabulous Firsts: Sardinia (January 1, 1851) (Much of this article comes from a “World of Stamps” study of Sardinia by Geir Sør-Reime in Mekeel’s & STAMPS.) Sardinia Sc. 1-3, above, and on Italy Sc. 587-89 for the 1951 Centenary of the first Sardinia issue The Kingdom of Sardinia (or rather the Kingdom of Sa- voy, Piedmont and Sardinia, as the official title was known) became the first Italian state to issue its own postage stamps, on January 1, 1851. The only part of Italy that was ahead of Sardinia was the Kingdom of Lombardy-Ve- netia, which was ruled directly as a part of the Austrian Empire. Distinct stamps for Lombardy-Venetia were first issued June 1, 1850. A rare cover with an 1851 First Issue 5 centesimi black vertical pair (Sc. 1) plus a 40c light rose (Sc. 4), all tied by mute small lozenge cancels, on a let- ter from Nice (16 MAG. 52, then under Sardinian rule) to Paris (19 MAI 52 back- stamp). This is an example of the 50c single weight letter rate to France. Issue 40 - April 4, 2014 - StampNewsOnline.net If you enjoy this article, and are not already a subscriber, for $12 a year you can enjoy 60+ pages a month. To subscribe, email [email protected] The Kingdom of Sardinia was to become the leading force in uniting Italy under one government, when in 1860, the King of Sardinia became king of Italy, although Rome was not united with the rest of Italy until 1870. As the Kingdom of Sardinia and then the Kingdom of Italy, at various times leading up to Unification, its stamps were used in other areas. Three covers with Sardinia issues used from other areas. Top, the 1855-63 5c light yellow green and 10c bistre Fourth Issues cancelled by a rare red Sardo-Italian “Lonato” of Lombardy boxed handstamp. The 1863 cover was sent from Lonato (22 DIC 63 c.d.s.)—the only known use of the “Lonato” boxed cancel on these two values. Center, an 1863 cover that bears a bisect of the 1862 20c used from the Papal States and tied by an Orvieto “29 Gen. 63” c.d.s. Bottom, an 1861 cover with the 1859 20c dark blue Fourth Issue tied by a rare boxed red Fanano cancel of Modena, sent to Siena via Mon- talcino (backstamp 6 Feb. 61). See also page 3. As is evident from its official title, the Kingdom of Sar- dinia comprised various areas. The royal house of Savoy originated in the French-speaking Savoy. This area was eventually transferred to France in 1860 along with the area around Nice. Until then, the small principality of Mo- Issue 40 - April 4, 2014 - StampNewsOnline.net This cover demonstrates the political geography of Sardinia. It is one of only three known covers showing a France 80c Napoleon, Sc. 20, cancelled by a Sardinian Chamonix cancel. By the Treaty of Turin, signed by Napoleon III of France and Victor Emmanuel II of Savoy and Sardinia on March 24, 1860, Chamonix, which is located at the foot of Mont Blanc, was annexed by France—the border defined in the treaty as being at the top of Mont Blanc, with Savoy, in which Chamonix is located, being on the French side. The July 26, 1860 Sardinian cancel is after that date of annexation. It was only briefly used, thus the rar- ity of this cover and its estimated value of more than $50,000. naco was totally surrounded by Sardinian territory, and now, Monaco is surrounded by French territory. The main area of Sardinia was Piedmont, the area sur- rounding the capital of Turin. And then came the island of Sardinia, which was acquired by the Duke of Savoy in 1720 as King. During the French occupation 1792-1814, the King of Sardinia resided on the island of Sardinia. After the fall of Napoleon, Piedmont was restored to the King- dom, and the former republic of Genoa was also united with Sardinia. The first postage-stamps of Sardinia were issued Janu- ary 1, 1851. The stamps featured a portrait of King Victor Emmanuel II. Unlike Tuscany, Sardinia at that time used a decimal currency, of 100 centesimi to the lira. The first series denominations were 5 centesimi (gray), 20c (blue), and 40c (rose). In common with all Sardinian stamps issued prior to unification, they were imperforate (see page 1. The Minister of Posts, Senator Pollone, started with the printers in France to have the stamps prepared. But they were designed and lithographed by Francisco Matraire in Turin, why is not clear. They are difficult to find and very expensive, the printing consisting of 30,000 5c; 100,000 20c; and only 20,000 of the 40c. Issue 40 - April 4, 2014 - StampNewsOnline.net 1853 20c embossed 1854 5c, Sc. 7 1855 5c, Sc. 10 on dull blue paper, Sc. 5 The three denominations were reissued in October 1853 embossed in albino on colored paper. This series proved unsatisfactory and in an attempt to improve the appear- ance of the stamps they were reprinted in April 1854 by a very complicated process. The frame was lithographed in color on white paper and on this the design was embossed as before in such a way that the king’s profile showed up on the white oval. The color of the frame varied con- siderably, prominent shades being recorded for all three denominations. Matraire next experimented with a combination of typography and embossing, with better results. In July 1855 the stamps were produced with the lettering typo- graphed in white with a colored frame, the profile alone being embossed as before. In 1858 10c and 8Oc values were introduced, and a 3 lira stamp added to the series in 1861. The color of the 40c stamp was changed from vermilion to scarlet in 1857. Similar stamps, with colored lettering on a white background, were issued by the Neapoli- tan Provinces, while similar stamps with Italy first issue, perforations appeared in 1862 and are Sc. 17 regarded as the first issue of Italy. The last stamps of Sardinia consisted of 1c and 2c stamps for use on newspapers. They were designed and printed by Matraire and released in January 1861. The numeral of value was embossed in the center, replacing Issue 40 - April 4, 2014 - StampNewsOnline.net the king’s profile. The frame was typo- graphed in black and the central medal- lion was still in colorless embossing. 1861, Newspaper issue, Sc. P1 The Cavallinis: First Stamps? Although most collectors disagree, some philatelists feel that Sardinia should be credited with having issued the first postage stamp more than 20 years before the 1840 British Penny Black. That claim is based on the Caval- linis, which were letter sheets printed with stamps of 15, 25, and 50 centesimi in 1819. These sheets showed a Horse- men, but were marked for the payment of fiscal rather than postal duty, thus ruling them out as postage stamps. Sardinia Cavallini 15c in round relief design of a boy on a horse. An 1820 Second Issue 50c Cavallini stamped letter sheet dry relief print on watermarked paper; and Italy Sc. 848, the 1961 Stamp Day issue. Issue 40 - April 4, 2014 - StampNewsOnline.net If you enjoyed this article, and are not already a subscriber, for $12 a year you can enjoy 60+ pages a month. To subscribe, email [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • When the Demos Shapes the Polis - the Use of Referendums in Settling Sovereignty Issues
    When the Demos Shapes the Polis - The Use of Referendums in Settling Sovereignty Issues. Gary Sussman, London School of Economics (LSE). Introduction This chapter is a survey of referendums dealing with questions of sovereignty. This unique category of referendum usage is characterized by the participation of the demos in determining the shape of the polis or the nature of its sovereignty. The very first recorded referendums, following the French Revolution, were sovereignty referendums. Though far from transparent and fair, these votes were strongly influenced by notions of self- determination and the idea that title to land could not be changed without the consent of those living on that land. Since then there have been over two hundred and forty sovereignty referendums. In the first part of this chapter I will briefly review referendum usage in general. This international analysis of 1094 referendums excludes the United States of America, where initiatives are extensively used by various states and Switzerland, which conducted 414 votes on the national level from 1866 to 1993. This comparative analysis of trends in referendum usage will provide both a sketch of the geographical distribution of use and a sense of use by issue. In the second section of this chapter I examine the history and origins of the sovereignty referendum and identify broad historical trends in its use. It will be demonstrated there have been several high tides in the use of sovereignty referendums and that these high tides are linked to high tides of nationalism, which have often followed the collapse of empires. Following this historical overview a basic typology of six sub-categories, describing sovereignty referendums will be suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great European Treaties of the Nineteenth Century
    JBRART Of 9AN DIEGO OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY EDITED BY SIR AUGUSTUS OAKES, CB. LATELY OF THE FOREIGN OFFICE AND R. B. MOWAT, M.A. FELLOW AND ASSISTANT TUTOR OF CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY SIR H. ERLE RICHARDS K. C.S.I., K.C., B.C.L., M.A. FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE AWD CHICHELE PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DIPLOMACY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ASSOCIATE OF THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, E.C. 4 LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW LEIPZIG NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE CAPETOWN BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS SHANGHAI HUMPHREY MILFORD PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY Impression of 1930 First edition, 1918 Printed in Great Britain INTRODUCTION IT is now generally accepted that the substantial basis on which International Law rests is the usage and practice of nations. And this makes it of the first importance that the facts from which that usage and practice are to be deduced should be correctly appre- ciated, and in particular that the great treaties which have regulated the status and territorial rights of nations should be studied from the point of view of history and international law. It is the object of this book to present materials for that study in an accessible form. The scope of the book is limited, and wisely limited, to treaties between the nations of Europe, and to treaties between those nations from 1815 onwards. To include all treaties affecting all nations would require volumes nor is it for the many ; necessary, purpose of obtaining a sufficient insight into the history and usage of European States on such matters as those to which these treaties relate, to go further back than the settlement which resulted from the Napoleonic wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Mont Blanc in British Literary Culture 1786 – 1826
    Mont Blanc in British Literary Culture 1786 – 1826 Carl Alexander McKeating Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds School of English May 2020 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Carl Alexander McKeating to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Carl Alexander McKeating in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Frank Parkinson, without whose scholarship in support of Yorkshire-born students I could not have undertaken this study. The Frank Parkinson Scholarship stipulates that parents of the scholar must also be Yorkshire-born. I cannot help thinking that what Parkinson had in mind was the type of social mobility embodied by the journey from my Bradford-born mother, Marie McKeating, who ‘passed the Eleven-Plus’ but was denied entry into a grammar school because she was ‘from a children’s home and likely a trouble- maker’, to her second child in whom she instilled a love of books, debate and analysis. The existence of this thesis is testament to both my mother’s and Frank Parkinson’s generosity and vision. Thank you to David Higgins and Jeremy Davies for their guidance and support. I give considerable thanks to Fiona Beckett and John Whale for their encouragement and expert interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþe L E V E N T H R E P O R T O N S U C C E S S I O N O F S T a T E S I N R E S P E C T O F M a T T E R
    Document:- A/CN.4/322 and Corr.1 & Add.1 & 2 Eleventh report on succession of States in respect of matters other than treaties, by Mr. Mohamed Bedjaoui, Special Rapporteur - draft articles on succession in respect of State archives, with commentaries Topic: Succession of States in respect of matters other than treaties Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1979, vol. II(1) Downloaded from the web site of the International Law Commission (http://www.un.org/law/ilc/index.htm) Copyright © United Nations SUCCESSION OF STATES IN RESPECT OF MATTERS OTHER THAN TREATIES [Agenda item 3] DOCUMENT A/CN.4/322 AND ADD.l AND 2* Eleventh report on succession of States in respect of matters other than treaties, by Mr. Mohammed Bedjaoui, Special Rapporteur Draft articles on succession in respect of State archives, with commentaries [Original: French] [18,29 and 31 May 1979] CONTENTS Page Abbreviation 68 Explanatory note: italics in quotations 68 Paragraphs Introduction 1_5 68 Chapter I. STATE ARCHIVES IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND IN THE SUCCESSION OF STATES 6-91 71 A. Definition of archives affected by the succession of States 6-24 71 1. Content of the concept of archives 8-19 72 2. Definition of archives in the light of State practice in the matter of succession of States 20-24 74 B. The role of archives in the modern world 25-39 75 1. The "paper war" 25-32 75 2. The age of information 33-39 77 C. The claim to archives and the protection of the national cultural heritage 40-56 78 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Horse Press Full Citation: Crook, D.S. D.J. Siddle, R.T. Jones, J.A. Dearing, G.C. Foster and R. Thompson. "Fores
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Crook, D.S. D.J. Siddle, R.T. Jones, J.A. Dearing, G.C. Foster and R. Thompson. "Forestry and Flooding in the Annecy Petit Lac Catchment, Haute-Savoie 1730–2000." Environment and History 8, no. 4 (November 2002): 403–28. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3135. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2002. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Forestry and Flooding in the Annecy Petit Lac Catchment, Haute-Savoie 1730–2000 D.S. CROOK*, D.J. SIDDLE, R.T. JONES, J.A. DEARING, G.C.FOSTER Department of Geography University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK R. THOMPSON Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Upland environments are particularly vulnerable to the stresses of climate change. The strength and persistence of such forces are not easy to measure and hence comparison of climate impacts with anthropogenic impacts has remained problematic. This paper attempts to demonstrate the nature of human impact on forest cover and flooding in the Annecy Petit Lac Catchment in pre-Alpine Haute Savoie, France, between 1730 and 2000. Local documentary sources and a pollen record provided a detailed history of forest cover and management, making it possible to plot changes in forest cover against local and regional precipitation records, and their individual and combined impacts on flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • ICRP Calendar
    The notions of International Relations (IR) in capital letters and international relations (ir) in lowercase letters have two different meanings. The first refers to a scholarly discipline while the second one means a set of contemporary events with historical importance, which influences global-politics. In order to make observations, formulate theories and describe patterns within the framework of ‘IR’, one needs to fully comprehend specific events related to ‘ir’. It is why the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy (ICRP) believes that a timeline on which all the significant events of international relations are identified might be beneficial for students, scholars or professors who deal with International Relations. In the following document all the momentous wars, treaties, pacts and other happenings are enlisted with a monthly division, which had considerable impact on world-politics. January 1800 | Nationalisation of the Dutch East Indies The Dutch East Indies was a Dutch colony that became modern Indonesia following World War II. It was formed 01 from the nationalised colonies of the Dutch East India Company, which came under the administration of the Dutch government in 1800. 1801 | Establishment of the United Kingdom On 1 January 1801, the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland united to form the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Most of Ireland left the union as the Irish Free State in 1922, leading to the remaining state being renamed as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1927. 1804 | Haiti independence declared The independence of Haiti was recognized by France on 17 April 1825.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.-The-Unification-Of-Italy.Pdf
    Magadh Mahila College Patna University, Patna HISTORY B.A. – I PAPER – IV RISE OF MODERN WEST Unit – 5 Topic: - Describe the Contribution of Cavour's in Unification of Italy By:- Dr. Amit Raj (Guest teacher) Department of History Magadh Mahila College Patna University, Patna Email : [email protected] Mob : 9472811500 THE UNIFICATION OF ITALY Nationalism and Liberalism in Italy received a death blow at the hands of the architects of the Congress of Vienna (1815) and the hopes and aspirations of the Italian patriots who desired to achieve unity and independence from the foreign yoke were dashed to the ground. Under the pretext of the principle of legitimacy, which governed the territorial readjustments after the fall of Napoleon I (1815), the principle of nationality was brushed aside and the old rulers were restored to their respective thrones as far as possible. In pursuance of this principle, Italy was divided into the following states : the Kingdom of Two Sicilies; Papal States; Tuscany; Lucca; Parma; Modena; Lombardy and Venetia; Piedmont and Savoy. The last two were parts of the Kingdom of Sardini. Thus, instead of unifying Italy, as was ardently hoped for by the Italian patriots, it was reduced to a mere "geographical expression". The system of government in all these states was reactionary and the influence of Austria was supreme. Lombardy and Venetia were parts of the Austrian Empire, and in Tuscany, Lucca, Parma and Modena, Hapsburg princes ruled. Metternich's writ ran all over the peninsula and through the "Concert of Europe" he succeeded in suppressing all liberal movements in Italy in 1820 and 1831.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPER 3 Italy (1815–1871) and Germany (1815–1890) SECOND EDITION
    History for the IB Diploma PAPER 3 Italy (1815–1871) and Germany (1815–1890) SECOND EDITION Mike Wells Series editor: Allan Todd 1 Introduction 5 2 The unification of Ital� 1815-48 18 2.1 What was Italy like before 1815? 21 2.2 What im1�act did the French Revolution and Napoleon have on Italy? 26 2.3 What was the imeact of the Congress System. on Italy? 30 2.4 Why was there unrest in Italy between 1815 and 1848? 33 2.5 How strong was nationalism in Italy by 1848? 38 2.6 Why did the 1848 Revolutions fail and how imeortant were they? 41 3 The Risorgimento and the establishment of the Kingdom of Italy 1849-61 54 3.1 What were the immediate consequences of the 1848-49 Revolutions? 57 3.2 How did Cavour move Italy towards unification? 59 3.3 What was the role of foreign influences in bringing about Italian unification? 68 3.4 What was the importance of Garibaldi in moving Italy towards greater unification? 82 4 Italy, 1861-71 95 4.1 What were the problems facing Italy in the 1860s? 98 4.2 State building in the 1860s: a new Italy or an expanded Piedmont? 104 4.3 How united was the new Italian state? 115 5 Germany 1815-49 127 5.1 What was Germany like before 1815? 130 5.2 What was the irn.pact of the Congress System on Germany? 1.39 5.3 How strong was nationalism in the Vormarz period in Germany? 145 5.4 What was the significance of the ZolJverein? 151.
    [Show full text]
  • IB History Study Guide
    Notum sit universis et singulis, quorum interest aut quomodolibet interesse potest, potest, interesse quomodolibet aut interest quorum singulis, et universis sit Notum postquam a multis annis orta in Imperio Romano dissidia motusque civiles eo usque usque eo civiles motusque dissidia Romano Imperio in orta annis multis a postquam increverunt, ut non modo universam Germaniam, sed et aliquot finitima regna, regna, finitima aliquot et sed Germaniam, universam modo non ut increverunt, potissimum vero Galliam, ita involverint, ut diuturnum et acre exinde natum sit bellum, bellum, sit natum exinde acre et diuturnum ut involverint, ita Galliam, vero potissimum primo quidem inter serenissimum et potentissimum principem ac dominum, dominum dominum dominum, ac principem potentissimum et serenissimum inter quidem primo Ferdinandum II., electum Romanorum imperatorem, semper augustum, Germaniae, Germaniae, augustum, semper imperatorem, Romanorum electum II., Ferdinandum Hungariae, Bohemiae, Dalmatiae, Croatiae, Sclavoniae regem, archiducem Austriae, Austriae, archiducem regem, Sclavoniae Croatiae, Dalmatiae, Bohemiae, Hungariae, ducem Burgundiae, Brabantiae, Styriae, Carinthiae, Carniolae, marchionem Moraviae, Moraviae, marchionem Carniolae, Carinthiae, Styriae, Brabantiae, Burgundiae, ducem ducem Luxemburgiae, Superioris ac Inferioris Silesiae, Wurtembergae et Teckae, Teckae, et Wurtembergae Silesiae, Inferioris ac Superioris Luxemburgiae, ducem principem Sueviae, comitem Habsburgi, Tyrolis, Kyburgi et Goritiae, marchionem Sacri Sacri marchionem Goritiae,
    [Show full text]
  • ICRP Calendar
    The notions of International Relations (IR) in capital letters and international relations (ir) in lowercase letters have two different meanings. The first refers to a scholarly discipline while the second one means a set of contemporary events with historical importance, which influences global-politics. In order to make observations, formulate theories and describe patterns within the framework of ‘IR’, one needs to fully comprehend specific events related to ‘ir’. It is why the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy (ICRP) believes that a timeline on which all the significant events of international relations are identified might be beneficial for students, scholars or professors who deal with International Relations. In the following document all the momentous wars, treaties, pacts and other happenings are enlisted with a monthly division, which had considerable impact on world-politics. January 1745 | Treaty of Warsaw The Treaty of Warsaw was a military pact among Great Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony. This 08 alliance supported Maria Theresa during the War of the Austrian Succession. It was also an anti-France alliance. 1792 | Treaty of Jassy The Treaty of Jassy was a peace agreement between the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire after the 09 Russo-Turkish War. According to this agreement Russia received important territories and became dominant power at the area of the Black Sea. 1732 | Treaty of Ahmet Pasha The Treaty of Ahmet Pasha was a peace agreement between the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Persia. The 10 Ottomans and Persians fought between 1723 and 1730 both part was exhausted at the end of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Reunification
    ITALY AND UNIFICATION 1789 - 1896 ‘The Risorgimento’ 1789 – 1870 ‘Liberal Italy’ 1861 - 1896 Italy 1789 - 1896 • The French Revolution (1789) & Napoleonic Italy (1796 – 1814/15) • Congress of Vienna (1815) • 1820-21 Revolutions • 1831 Revolutions • Development of Nationalist ideas in 1830s-40s • 1848-49 Revolutions • Rise of Piedmont in 1850s – Cavour & Victor Emmanuel II • Napoleon III (1849 – 1870) • The War of 1859 • Garibaldi in 1860 & the Unification of Italy (1861) • Bismarck (1866-70) • Italy (1861-96) - United or Divided? Problems & Successes • Unification or Piedmontisation? What made it difficult to unify Italy? The geography of the place: mountain ranges; rivers; islands; etc. Past history of fragmentation and warfare. Widely varying languages and dialects. Differing customs, laws and traditions. Interests of foreign powers especially France, Austria and Spain. “Italy is only a geographical expression.” Metternich, 1847 A long, narrow The Papacy did not mainland, divided by favour the idea of a mountains and rivers, single power being encircled by an dominant in the archipelago of islands. peninsula which could rival its authority. Political disunity in the Italian peninsula since Many small Italian the fall of the Western states had enjoyed Roman Empire centuries of economic c. AD 476. prosperity & cultural flourishing. A crucible for imperial & dynastic rivalry. Linguistic disunity. Localism dominated Local political Italian politics – structures varied: loyalty to local absolute monarchy; governments. oligarchic republic. Italy before 1796 The French Revolution 1789 - 1799 Napoleon Bonaparte (1769 – 1821) • 1789 - The French Revolution overturned the power of the monarchy in one of Europe’s leading states & threatened to undermine the continent’s traditional political structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53574-6 440 INDEX
    INDEX A Anglomania, 375, 380 Abreu, Felix Joseph de, 225, 227 Anglophobia, 374–375, 380, Acadia, 139 382–383, 399 Accarias de Sérionne, Jacques, 36, Anjou, Duc d’, see under Philip V, 212, 234, 245, 263 King of Spain See also Choiseul Anna Ioannovna, Russian Act of Settlement (1701), 326 Empress, 192 Adams, John, 212 Anne, Queen of Great Adelman, Jeremy, 403 Britain, 129–130, 132–133, 138, Adriatic, 360, 365–366 152–153, 173 Affry, Louis Auguste, Comte d’, 208 See also Treaty of Asiento; Treaty of Africa, North, 33, 337 Barcelona Agras, Francesco, 361 Annual ship (navío de permiso), and Alberoni, Giulio, 177, 179–181 British contraband, 25–26, 154, Alcabala (alcavala) sales tax, 162 156–158, 160–161 Alekseev, Ivan Ivanovic, 191 See also Treaty of Utrecht, Spain- Alembert, Jean-Baptiste Le Rond Great Britain, commerce d’, 231 (1713); Treaty of Madrid, Almansa, Battle of (1707), 152 Spain-Britain (1750) Amelot de Chaillou, Jean-Jacques, 250 Antilles, 165, 409 America, trade, North, 181 Anti-Machiavel, and Prussian Spanish (see under Spain) reform, 282, 296–301, 303–304 See also United States See also Frederick II; Voltaire Ammon, Christoph Heinrich von, 311 Antin, Antoine François de Pardaillan Amor de Soria, Juan, 165 de Gondrin, Marquis d’, 251 Amsterdam, 186, 188, 203, 210, 213, Antwerp, 198, 319, 364 311, 319, 341, 366 Aosta, duchy of, 321 © The Author(s) 2017 439 A. Alimento, K. Stapelbroek (eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53574-6 440 INDEX Arcot, 271, 285 French-Austrian
    [Show full text]