DOCSLIB.ORG

East Derwent Highway Upgrade Development Application Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East Derwent Highway Upgrade Development Application Report East Derwent Highway Upgrade Development Application Report August 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 STRATEGIC RATIONALE AND PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 5 OPTIONS ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. 6 LOCATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 SITE ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 SURROUNDS ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 TITLES .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 EXISTING ROAD AND ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................ 10 PROPOSAL .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 BRIDGE STRUCTURES.......................................................................................................................................... 19 PUBLIC TRANSPORT ........................................................................................................................................... 20 PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS ................................................................................................................................. 20 LOCAL ROADS AND PRIVATE ACCESSES ................................................................................................................... 21 STORMWATER .................................................................................................................................................. 21 SERVICE RELOCATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 22 LANDSCAPING .................................................................................................................................................. 23 LIGHTING ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 LAND ACQUISITION............................................................................................................................................ 23 GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 FLORA & FAUNA ............................................................................................................................................... 24 LAND CAPABILITY .............................................................................................................................................. 24 NATURAL HAZARDS ........................................................................................................................................... 24 HISTORIC HERITAGE ........................................................................................................................................... 24 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ....................................................................................................................................... 24 NOISE ............................................................................................................................................................ 24 CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 25 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................... 26 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................................................................ 27 PLANNING SCHEME .......................................................................................................................................... 29 ASSESSMENT OF AN APPLICATION FOR USE OR DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 29 PLANNING SCHEME OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................ 30 USE CATEGORISATION ........................................................................................................................................ 30 PART C ZONES ................................................................................................................................................. 30 PART D CODES ................................................................................................................................................. 43 PART F SPECIFIC AREA PLANS ............................................................................................................................... 70 TASMANIAN HERITAGE REGISTER ............................................................................................................... 71 STATE POLICIES ................................................................................................................................................ 71 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................................... 73 Introduction This report supports a development application by the Department of State Growth (State Growth) to the Clarence City Council (Council) for the East Derwent Highway Upgrade. The purpose of this highway upgrade is to improve the capacity and safety along the East Derwent Highway between Golf Links Road and Sugarloaf Road (a stretch of approximately 1.5 kilometres) by duplicating the existing single carriageway to provide a total of four lanes (two each way), and upgrading the Geilston Bay Road/Clinton Road intersection to include the installation of traffic signals. The project will: · make the highway wider to have four lanes of traffic – two lanes in each direction · build a new concrete raised central median and safety barrier to reduce the risk of crashes · install new traffic lights at the upgraded intersection at Clinton Road and Geilston Bay Road · build safer access off the highway to Araluen Street, Lindisfarne North Primary School and Geilston Bay Recreation Area · add an off-road shared path and on-road cycling lanes, and · improve the left-turn pocket at the Sugarloaf Road intersection. Section 6 of this report provides a detailed assessment of the proposal. The proposed upgrade requires development approval under the Clarence Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (the Scheme). Section 9 of this report provides a detailed assessment against the relevant provisions of the Scheme. This report is supported by the following appendices: · Appendix A: Council’s Application form · Appendix B: Certificates of Title · Appendix C: Drawings · Appendix D: Department of State Growth - Crown landowner consent · Appendix E: Department of Education - Crown landowner consent · Appendix F: Clarence Council - Council landowner consent · Appendix G: Natural Values Assessment (Jacobs, August 2020) · Appendix H: Noise Assessment (Jacobs, July 2020) · Appendix I: Ground Conditions Assessment (Jacobs, August 2019) · Appendix J: Hydraulics Impact Assessment (Jacobs, August 2020) · Appendix K: Traffic Assessment (Jacobs, August 2020) Background The East Derwent Upgrade from Golf Links Road to Sugarloaf Road is a component of the Tasmanian Government’s $117 million Southern Roads Package commitment in 2018. The objective of the Project is to improve traffic flow and address safety concerns in this section of the corridor. This will be achieved through duplication of the existing highway to provide two lanes in each direction, as well as intersection upgrades. The East Derwent Highway is classified as a “Category 3 Road” under the Tasmanian State Road Hierarchy and is a key link in Greater Hobart’s transport network between the Tasman Highway at Montagu Bay and the Midland Highway at Bridgewater, on Hobart’s eastern shore. The section of highway between the Tasman Highway interchange and Grasstree Hill Road carries a diverse mix of traffic including commercial vehicles, commuters, tourists and is predominantly dual carriageway in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Road Closures
    summary of road closures targa.com.au #TARGA | #TARGAhighcountry#TARGAtasmania | #TARGAtasmania2021 | #TARGAhighcountry2021 LEG ONE – monday 19th April MUNICIPALITY OF MEANDER VALLEY Stage Name: HIGH PLAINS Road closure time: 7:57 – 12:27 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Weetah Road Mitchells Road and East Parkham Road MUNICIPALITY OF LATROBE Stage Name: MORIARTY Road closure time: 8:27 – 12:57 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Valley Field Road Chaple Road and Oppenheims Road Oppenheims Road Valley Field Road and Hermitage Lane Hermitage Lane Oppenheims Road and Bonneys Road Bonneys Lane Hermitage Lane and Moriarty Road CITY OF DEVONPORT AND MUNICIPALITY OF KENTISH Stage Name: PALOONA Road closure time: 10:01 – 14:31 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Buster Road Melrose Road and Melrose Road Melrose Road Buster Road and Paloona Road Paloona Road Melrose Road and Paloona Dam Road Paloona Dam Road Paloona Road and Lake Paloona Road Lake Paloona Road Paloona Dam Road and Lower Barrington Road Stage Name: MT ROLAND Road closure time: 10:42 – 15:12 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Olivers Road Claude Road and Mersey Forest Road Mersey Forest Road Olivers Road and Liena Road MUNICIPALITY OF MEANDER VALLEY Stage Name: GOLDEN VALLEY Road closure time: 11:50 – 16:20 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Highland Lakes Road Golden Valley Road and Haulage Road MUNICIPALITY OF NORTHERN MIDLANDS Stage Name: POATINA Road closure time: 13:01 – 17:31 Roads Closed Between the following Roads Poatina Road Westons Road
    [Show full text]
  • Otago Lagoon and Coastal Reserves Activity Plan 2016
    Reserve Activity Plan _______________________________________________________ 2016 - 2020 OTAGO LAGOON AND COASTAL RESERV EEESSS ADVICE PREPARED BY TASFLORA FOR CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL MAY 2016 © Tasflora 2016. This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Commonwealth Copyright Act 1968 , no part (including the format, structure and style) may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without prior written permission from Tasflora. Reserve Activity Plan 2016-2020 Otago Lagoon and Coastal Reserves CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 5 2 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 5 3 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 5 4 SITE VALUES................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Native flora .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Native fauna .............................................................................................. 10 4.3 Cultural heritage ....................................................................................... 11 4.3.1 Aboriginal heritage ............................................................................... 11 4.3.2 Historic heritage ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Do Oma Ain H High Hwa Ay P Plann Ning G
    Tasmanian Government 2012 Submission to Nation Building 2 Program Domain Highway Planning (Part of Brooker Highway Upgrades submission to Infrastructure Australia) September 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Priority assigned by jurisdiction for NB2 Priority three under Innovation funding consideration Details of full scope of project, including Information on project objectives, strategic objectives, service requirements, project context and options analysis is discussed in status and project phase(s) seeking the Stage 1-6 template. funding. Note: It is expected that this will be largely addressed through the main IA submission. However, the Department requires cost estimates to be provided using the Best Practice Cost Estimation Standard and at both P50 and P90. Also to use both 4% and 7% for BCRs. Alignment with objectives of NB2 The Domain Highway Planning project is Note: This should include how a project submitted under the Innovation theme of aligns with the overarching objective of Nation Building 2, and also aligns with NB2, as well as how it aligns with the Connecting People and Moving Freight objective of each relevant NB2 subprogram. themes. The Domain Highway is a key urban freight and passenger connection in Greater Hobart. The Highway has two major high-volume interchanges with the Brooker Highway and Tasman Highway. The Domain Highway Interchange with the Brooker Highway is one of two key capacity bottlenecks on the Highway. This project will develop detailed design options at the Domain Highway Interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Mall - Temporary Partial Relocation Proposal Traffic Impact Assessment and Safety Analysis
    Department of State Growth Hobart Bus Mall - Temporary Partial Relocation Proposal Traffic Impact Assessment and Safety Analysis June 2017 This report: has been prepared by GHD for Department of State Growth and may only be used and relied on by Department of State Growth for the purpose agreed between GHD and the Department of State Growth as set out in GHD’s fee proposal dated 24 March 2017 for Contract No. 2220-2-69. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than Department of State Growth arising in connection with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this report on the basis of information provided by Department of State Growth and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Road Futures
    TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2019 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Funding Total Funding Total Funding Total from cost from cost from cost 2019 2019 2019 Greater Hobart Traffic Solution $72.1M $93.8M Includes: East Tamar Highway $6M $7M Northern Road Upgrades State and Federal $44.9M $54.2M State and Federal – Mowbray Connector Midland Highway 10 year plan Control of Macquarie and Davey streets Includes: West Tamar Highway $11.2M $12M Bass Highway – Deloraine to Latrobe Southern Outlet fifth lane Traffic Solution: Pedestrian crossing Campbell Town River Derwent ferry service Gravelly Beach Road to Rosevears Drive Tasman Highway at Myrtle Park Traffic incident response Atkinsons Road and Waldhorn Drive Dorset Roads Package and transport access points Overtaking opportunities between Exeter Bus priorities and active transport initiatives and Batman Highway junction Tomahawk to Gladstone Northern suburbs light rail Resealing and widening north of Batman Prossers Road Highway intersection to Lightwood Hills Road Underground bus transit centre Esk Main Road Left turn lane Motor Road/West Greater Hobart master plan Tamar Highway junction Airport to Evandale Road Improved Hadspen access Urban Congestion Fund State $24M State and Federal $84.7M $0.4m Federal $58.7M State $58M State Bridgewater Bridge $576M Midland Highway 10 year plan $325M Hobart Congestion Package (linked to Federal $236M Federal $111.4M projects in Greater Hobart Traffic Solution) Roads of Strategic Importance: Bass State $25.8M North West Road Upgrades State and Federal $35.7M $50.1M Tasman Highway Intelligent Transport Systems Highway (Wynyard to Marrawah), $606M Hobart to Sorell corridor, Birralee Federal $205M Bass Highway (West of Wynyard), including South East Traffic Solution State and Federal $25.9M $27M Main Road, Old Surry Road/Massey- Brittons Swamp, Wynyard to Smithton passing Greene Drive, Murchison Highway, lanes, access to Boat Harbour Primary School Tasman Highway near Tasmania Golf Club Lyell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Highway at Paradise Gorge Black Bridge To
    2001 (No. 2) _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS TASMAN HIGHWAY AT PARADISE GORGE BLACK BRIDGE TO ORFORD ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Mr Wing (Chairman) Mr Green Mr Harriss Mr Hidding Mr Kons 1 To His Excellency the Honourable Sir Guy Stephen Montague Green, Companion of the Order of Australia, Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY The Committee has investigated the following proposal: - TASMAN HIGHWAY AT PARADISE GORGE – BLACK BRIDGE TO ORFORD and now has the honour to present the Report to Your Excellency in accordance with the Public Works Committee Act 1914. 1. INTRODUCTION This reference sought the approval of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works for selective improvements to the Tasman Highway at Paradise Gorge – Black Bridge to Orford. 1.1 BACKGROUND The section of Tasman Highway through Paradise Gorge is noted for its spectacular setting. The road is located immediately adjacent to and south of the Prosser River and retained by substantial dry stone walls on the river side with the dolerite faces of the Gorge alongside and above the road, opposite the river. The Highway is also noted for its narrow, winding alignment through the Gorge due to these same topographic constraints. As the Tasman Highway has been progressively upgraded over the past 20 years or so, improvement works in the Gorge area have been put aside in preference to other projects due to the significant construction issues posed by the topography and the high costs of widening or realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • South Arm South Arm Highway Planning Planning
    Tasmanian Government 2012 Submission to Nation Building 2 Program South Arm Highway Planning September 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Priority assigned by jurisdiction for NB2 Priority six under Innovation funding consideration Details of full scope of project, including Information on project objectives, strategic objectives, service requirements, project context and options analysis is discussed in status and project phase(s) seeking the Stage 1-6 template. funding. Note: It is expected that this will be largely addressed through the main IA submission. However, the Department requires cost estimates to be provided using the Best Practice Cost Estimation Standard and at both P50 and P90 . Also to use both 4% and 7% for BCRs. Alignment with objectives of NB2 The South Arm Highway Planning project is submitted under the Innovation theme of Note: This should include how a project Nation Building 2, and also aligns with aligns with the overarching objective of Connecting People . NB2, as well as how it aligns with the objective of each relevant NB2 subprogram. The project focuses on investigating transport options to improve accessibility and connectivity in a high-growth residential area of Greater Hobart. Further details are contained under Goal Definition (Stage1-6 template). Alignment with broader Commonwealth The project aligns with the following Australian and state/territory policies and plans Government plans and policies: • Note: Specific plans/policies to be Infrastructure Australia’s theme for addressed (at a minimum) include the action ‘Transforming our Cities’. Commonwealth’s Infrastructure Investment • Infrastructure Australia June 2011 and Framework; the National Urban Policy; the June 2012 Report to COAG.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation Under the Roads and Jetties Act 1935
    TASMANIA __________ PROCLAMATION UNDER THE ROADS AND JETTIES ACT 1935 STATUTORY RULES 2018, No. 91 __________ I, the Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, by this my proclamation made under section 7 of the Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – (a) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 1 to this proclamation to be State highways for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (b) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 2 to this proclamation to be a single subsidiary road, classified as a main road, for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (c) amend the proclamation notified in the Gazette as Statutory Rules 1970, No.67 as follows: (i) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Brooker Highway and substituting the following item: Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No. 91 Brooker Highway From the intersection with the 11.48 Tasman Highway to the Midland Highway at, and (18.48 including, the intersection with kilometres) the Lyell Highway, Granton (ii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Southern Outlet Highway and substituting the following item: Southern Outlet From the intersection with the 5.95 Highway southern boundary of the Davey/Macquarie Couplet, (9.582 South Hobart to and including kilometres) the Kingston Interchange (iii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Tasman Highway and substituting the following item: 2 Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA RELEASE Saturday, 30 January 2021
    MEDIA RELEASE Saturday, 30 January 2021 RACT member survey reveals Tassie’s worst roads RACT members are calling for major investments into Tasmania’s worst roads. RACT’s Chief Member Experience Officer, Stacey Pennicott, said 200,000 members were invited to have their say on Tasmania’s roads. “We asked our 200,000 members to tell us what roads weren’t up to scratch and the results were clear,” Ms Pennicott said. “The Tasman Highway is by far Tasmania’s worst road, according to our members with nearly 40 per cent of those responding saying it needs urgent upgrades. “The Tasman Highway runs for 410 kilometres between Launceston and Hobart, covering the north- east, east coast and Hobart’s eastern shore. As visitor numbers begin to pick up and as the population served by the Tasman continues to grow, this Highway is going to become more and more important. Unfortunately, it has not received anywhere near the investment required to keep up with demand. Ms Pennicott said that the Midland Highway was rated Tasmania’s second worst road, with a third of RACT members surveyed saying more needs to be done. “We have seen significant upgrades on the Midland Highway in recent years and the State and Federal Governments deserve credit for that. However, there is still a lot of work to be done to bring the full length of the Highway up to scratch. “Hobart’s Southern Outlet was ranked as Tasmania’s third worst road due to persistent problems with delays. We encourage the Government to get on with its plans to improve access by developing park and ride facilities in Kingston to take the pressure off and help avoid the daily bottlenecks at peak times.
    [Show full text]
  • Bypass Means New Approach for Golfers
    VOL 12 NO 5 AUGUST 2010 Volcanic Drive extended 300 metres for access Bypass means new approach for golfers Catnip Cattery owners Narelle and Lionel Brown are delighted with their state award in the Telstra Tasmanian GOLFERS at the Tea Tree business awards. Golf Club are taking a new approach to the clubhouse as Golf Club Road has been Purrfect awards closed to make way for the new bypass. Access to the golf club is now via Volcanic Drive outcome for which has been extended 300 Golfers can metres to become the new now access the Tea Tree permanent road to the golf Golf Club Catnip Cattery club. from the Brighton Bypass Project Volcanic (northern section) commu- OLD Beach business Cat- growth. Drive nity relations officer Karyn extension. nip Cattery was recently Other winners in the Kennedy said work was pro- named as one of six win- 2010 Telstra Tasmanian Busi- gressing well. ners in the 18th Testra Tas- ness Awards were: “With heavy machinery manian Business Awards • InSPArations Day Spa and trucks in the area, along and the owners couldn’t be of Spreyton – MYOB small with deep cuttings in the more delighted. business award. road, safety is incredibly Narelle and Lionel • Maintenance Systems important,” she said. Brown were recently named Solutions of Shearwater – “Parents and grandpar- winners in the business Panasonic Australia medium ents with young children are owner micro-business business award. asked to talk about these awards category. • Insight4 of Hobart – safety risks with their chil- Mr Brown said Catnip AMP innovation award. dren. enter the site.” traders are finding it a little struction continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Congestion in Greater Hobart
    Congestion in Greater Hobart Summary report July 2011 Department of Infrastructure, 1 Energy and Resources CONTENTS 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 What influences congestion ............................................................................................. 3 3 Measuring congestion ...................................................................................................... 3 4 Community responses to congestion ............................................................................... 4 4.1 Major infrastructure responses ................................................................................. 4 4.2 One way streets ........................................................................................................ 5 5 DIER’s approach to managing congestion ...................................................................... 5 5.1 What is DIER doing? ................................................................................................ 5 2 1 SUMMARY • The Department of Infrastructure Energy and Resources (DIER) has developed a report on congestion in Greater Hobart which outlines the influences of congestion and the approach DIER is undertaking to manage congestion. • DIER recognises that there is community concern regarding congestion on key urban roads in Greater Hobart and that appropriate measures need to be put in place to manage traffic growth and delays. • DIER’s strategic planning
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Bypass
    2009 (No. 10) 2009 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Brighton Bypass ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Green Mrs Napier By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 00000 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................3 SCOPE OF WORKS....................................................................................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ....................................................... 14 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION...................................................................................... 24 SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ..........................................................................................................25 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS...........................................................................26 PROJECT COSTS .........................................................................................................................28 EVIDENCE .....................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]